ML22285A253

NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Farley Proposed Inservice Inspection Alternative FNP-ISI-ALT-05-05, Version 1.0

ML22285A253
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	10/12/2022
From:	John Lamb Plant Licensing Branch II
To:	Sparkman W Southern Nuclear Operating Co
References
Download: ML22285A253 (3)

Text

From: John Lamb Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 4:26 PM To: Sparkman, Wesley A.

Cc: Chamberlain, Amy Christine; Pournaras, DeLisa S.

Subject:

Acceptance Review - Farley Proposed Inservice Inspection Alternative FNP-ISI-ALT-05-05, Version 1.0 Importance: High

Wes, By letter dated September 30, 2022, Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC, the licensee) an inservice inspection (ISI) alternative request for Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant (Farley),

Units 1 and 2. SNC is requesting an ISI alternative to the examination requirements of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)Section XI, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-B, Item Nos. C2.21 and C2.22. The proposed alternative by SNC is to increase the inspection interval for these Item Nos. for the replacement SGs to 20 years (from the current ASME Code,Section XI 10-year requirement).

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this alternative request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z)(1) and 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 250 hours0.00289 days <br />0.0694 hours <br />4.133598e-4 weeks <br />9.5125e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review on October 12, 2023. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

John G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Hearing Identifier: NRR_DRMA Email Number: 1806 Mail Envelope Properties (MN2PR09MB5084786887F01A14FB02D570FA229)

Subject:

Acceptance Review - Farley Proposed Inservice Inspection Alternative FNP-ISI-ALT-05-05, Version 1.0 Sent Date: 10/12/2022 4:26:22 PM Received Date: 10/12/2022 4:26:00 PM From: John Lamb Created By: John.Lamb@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Chamberlain, Amy Christine" <ACCHAMBE@southernco.com>

Tracking Status: None "Pournaras, DeLisa S." <DSPOURNA@SOUTHERNCO.COM>

Tracking Status: None "Sparkman, Wesley A." <WASPARKM@southernco.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: MN2PR09MB5084.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3437 10/12/2022 4:26:00 PM Options Priority: High Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: