Letter Sequence Acceptance Review |
|---|
TAC:MF5317, Administratively Control Containment Penetrations, Add Note to LCO 3.9.5 Allowing Shutdown Cooling Loops Removal from Operation, Modify Section 3.8 Mode Restriction Notes, Reduce Plant Trips Due to Spurious Signals to the Nis During Physics Testing, Add Met Vs. Perform to Specification 1.4, Frequency, Determination of Cumulative and Projected Dose Contributions in Recp, Containment Structural Integrity, Provide Separate Condition Entry for Each PORV and Block Valve, Nis Power Range Channel Daily SR TS Change to Address LOW Power Decalibration (Withdrawn, Closed) TAC:MF5318, Administratively Control Containment Penetrations, Add Note to LCO 3.9.5 Allowing Shutdown Cooling Loops Removal from Operation, Modify Section 3.8 Mode Restriction Notes, Reduce Plant Trips Due to Spurious Signals to the Nis During Physics Testing, Add Met Vs. Perform to Specification 1.4, Frequency, Determination of Cumulative and Projected Dose Contributions in Recp, Containment Structural Integrity, Provide Separate Condition Entry for Each PORV and Block Valve, Nis Power Range Channel Daily SR TS Change to Address LOW Power Decalibration (Withdrawn, Closed) |
|
MONTHYEARML14335A6232014-11-24024 November 2014
Units 1 and 2 - Request for Technical Specification Amendment Adoption of Previously NRC-Approved Generic Technical Specification Changes and Other Changes
Project stage: Request
ML14343A7812015-01-0808 January 2015
Acceptance Review
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML15195A4682015-08-14014 August 2015
Request for Additional Information
Project stage: RAI
ML16097A6022016-04-0808 April 2016
Audit of Supporting Design, Licensing and Other Documents Related to License Amendment Requests to Support Adoption of Technical Specification Task Force Traveler 312
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML16138A6512016-06-0202 June 2016
Audit of Supporting Design, Licensing & Other Documents Related to License Amendment Requests to Support the Adoption of Technical Specification Task Force Traveler 312
Project stage: Other
ML16287A3412016-10-20020 October 2016
Withdrawal of TSTF-312 Amendment Request
Project stage: Withdrawal
2015-08-14
[Table View] |
|
|---|
Category:Acceptance Review Letter
MONTHYEARML24276A1132024-10-0202 October 2024
Acceptance Review - License Amendment Request to Revise TS SR 3.4.14.3 and Correct Administrative Oversight
ML24205A2142024-07-23023 July 2024
Acceptance Review - License Amendment Request to Change TS 3.6.5, Containment Air Temperature
ML24178A3762024-07-0101 July 2024
Nonacceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.6.5, Containment Air Temperature, Using Risk-Informed Process for Evaluations
ML21095A0872021-04-19019 April 2021
Non-Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement 3.3.5.2 Allowable Values
ML16224A1432016-08-23023 August 2016
Acceptance Review Regarding Reactor Vessel Threads in Flange Examination
ML16204A0422016-07-26026 July 2016
Acceptance Letter, Unacceptable, with Opportunity to Supplement
ML15259A3292015-10-0101 October 2015
Acceptance Review
ML15141A0562015-06-0404 June 2015
Acceptance Review
ML15117A4762015-04-30030 April 2015
Acceptance Review Regarding License Amendment to Adopt TSTF-432-A, Rev. 1
ML14343A7812015-01-0808 January 2015
Acceptance Review
ML14288A4472014-11-0404 November 2014
Acceptance Review Regarding Proposed Inservice Inspection Alternative (FNP-ISI-ALT-17, Version 1)
ML14265A2272014-10-24024 October 2014
Acceptance Review Regarding License Amendment to Revise Surveillance Requirement 3.3.2 and Technical Specification 5.6.5
ML13022A1582013-01-24024 January 2013
Acceptance Review Concerning Voluntary Fire Protection Risk Initiative Request (TAC Nos. ME9741 and ME9742) (N-1-2-1893)
ML12297A2632012-11-0707 November 2012
Acceptance Review
ML12257A0982012-09-25025 September 2012
Acceptance Review - Unacceptable with Opportunity to Supplement (TAC ME9293 & ME9294)
ML12011A0682011-11-23023 November 2011
NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review of Farley IST Program - Relief Request Proposed Alternative RR-P-3, Version 2 (ME7512 and ME7513)
ML1102501572011-01-25025 January 2011
Acceptance of Farley Relief Request Dated January 5, 2011
ML1001205962010-01-12012 January 2010
Email on Acceptance Review for Farley Relief Request
2024-07-23
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 8, 2015 Mr. C. R. Pierce Regulatory Affairs Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
P. 0. Box 1295 I Bin - 038 Birmingham, AL 35201-1295
SUBJECT:
JOSEPH M. FARLEY, UNITS 1 AND 2- ACCEPTANCE REVIEW (TAC NOS. MF5317 AND MF5318)
Dear Mr. Pierce:
By letter dated November 24, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Package Accession No. ML14335A689), the Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.,
submitted a request to revise the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 and Unit 2, Technical Specifications to adopt various previously approved Technical Specifications Task Force Travelers and two changes not associated with Travelers. A list of the requested changes was
- included in Enclosure 1 of the application.
The purpose of this correspondence is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
- Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review ofthis request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (1 0 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required.
This section stipulates that the sut;>mittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to continue its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. . Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review* are identified in "requests for additional information" despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate
C. R. Pierce If you have any questions, please contact me on (301) 415-1009.
Sincerely, Shawn.Williams, Senior Project Manager Plantlicensing Branch 11-1
- Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos.: 50-348 and 50-364 cc: Distribution via Listserv
.ML14343A781 OFFICE NRR/LPLII-1/PM NRR/LPLII-1/LA NRR/LPLII-1/BC NRR/LPLII-1/PM NAME SWilliams SFigueroa RPascarelli (GEMiller for) SWilliams DATE 12/11/14 12/11/14 01/07/15 01/08/15
