ML100670047: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 03/08/2010
| issue date = 03/08/2010
| title = Acceptance of 02/26/10 Application for Review
| title = Acceptance of 02/26/10 Application for Review
| author name = Martin R E
| author name = Martin R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| addressee name = Ajluni M J, McKinney B D
| addressee name = Ajluni M, Mckinney B
| addressee affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| docket = 05000364
| docket = 05000364
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Martin, Robert To: "Ajluni, Mark J."; "McKinney, B. Doug";
{{#Wiki_filter:From:             Martin, Robert To:               "Ajluni, Mark J."; "McKinney, B. Doug";
cc: Boyle, Patrick; Cotton, Karen; Marcus, Barry;  
cc:               Boyle, Patrick; Cotton, Karen; Marcus, Barry;


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance of February 26, 2010 Application for review Date: Monday, March 08, 2010 7:30:00 AM By letter dated February 26, 2010, (ML100600593, TAC No. ME3445), SNC submitted a request to revise the Technical Specifications (TS), Appendix A  
Acceptance of February 26, 2010 Application for review Date:             Monday, March 08, 2010 7:30:00 AM By letter dated February 26, 2010, (ML100600593, TAC No. ME3445), SNC submitted a request to revise the Technical Specifications (TS), Appendix A to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-8 for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 2. The change would allow postponement, for one fuel cycle, of a modification to delete the reactor trip system Function 11, reactor coolant pump breaker position trip.
 
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this application.
to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-8 for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear  
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the SNCs request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Plant, Unit 2. The change would allow postponement, for one fuel cycle, of  
Bob Martin, Project Manager LPL 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No: 50-364}}
 
a modification to delete the reactor trip system Function 11, reactor coolant  
 
pump breaker position trip.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear  
 
Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this application.
 
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient  
 
technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete  
 
its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to  
 
identify whether the application has any readily apparent information  
 
insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the  
 
licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does  
 
provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to  
 
proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent  
 
assessment regarding the acceptability of the SNCs request in terms of  
 
regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and  
 
the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete  
 
its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Bob Martin, Project Manager LPL 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No: 50-364}}

Latest revision as of 22:09, 13 November 2019

Acceptance of 02/26/10 Application for Review
ML100670047
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 03/08/2010
From: Martin R
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Ajluni M, Mckinney B
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
martin, r e, NRR/DORL, 301-415-1493
References
TAC ME3445
Download: ML100670047 (1)
v • d • e


Text

From: Martin, Robert To: "Ajluni, Mark J."; "McKinney, B. Doug";

cc: Boyle, Patrick; Cotton, Karen; Marcus, Barry;

Subject:

Acceptance of February 26, 2010 Application for review Date: Monday, March 08, 2010 7:30:00 AM By letter dated February 26, 2010, (ML100600593, TAC No. ME3445), SNC submitted a request to revise the Technical Specifications (TS), Appendix A to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-8 for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 2. The change would allow postponement, for one fuel cycle, of a modification to delete the reactor trip system Function 11, reactor coolant pump breaker position trip.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this application.

The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the SNCs request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Bob Martin, Project Manager LPL 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No: 50-364

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML100670047&oldid=2136263"