ML101960310: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/12/2010
| issue date = 04/12/2010
| title = RB-2010-04-Final Rejected KAs
| title = RB-2010-04-Final Rejected KAs
| author name = Garchow S M
| author name = Garchow S
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/OB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/OB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Rev 1 ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier / Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejection 1/1 295027 EK3.02 River Bend design does not include containment spray mode. Reselect 295027 EK3.01 1/2 295034 G.2.1.9 The RO would not pe rform this functio
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-401                   Record of Rejected K/As                             Form ES-401-4 Tier /     Randomly                          Reason for Rejection Group   Selected K/A 1/1   295027 EK3.02 River Bend design does not include containment spray mode.
: n. Reselected 295034 G.2.4.46 2/1 211000 G.2.4.3 No credible tie for this generic KA exists for the system. Reselected 211000 G.2.4.6 2/1 261000 K3.03 River Bend design includes a Mark III containment as opposed to a Mark I or II containment. Reselected 261000 K3.02 2/1 400000 K5.01 This KA had an importance rating of <2.5. Based on review of the Plant Safety Analysis operation of this system is not of high significance. Reselected 400000 A2.02. (There were no other K5 statements to select from). 2/2 239003 K2.01 This KA had an importance rating of <2.5. Based on review of the Plant Safety Analysis operation of this system is not of high significance. Reselected 239003 G.2.2.
Reselect 295027 EK3.01 1/2   295034 G.2.1.9 The RO would not perform this function. Reselected 295034 G.2.4.46 2/1   211000 G.2.4.3 No credible tie for this generic KA exists for the system. Reselected 211000 G.2.4.6 2/1   261000 K3.03   River Bend design includes a Mark III containment as opposed to a Mark I or II containment. Reselected 261000 K3.02 2/1   400000 K5.01   This KA had an importance rating of <2.5. Based on review of the Plant Safety Analysis operation of this system is not of high significance. Reselected 400000 A2.02. (There were no other K5 statements to select from).
: 22. (There were no other K2 statements to select from). 2/2 290003 K2 There were no K2 item with an Importance Rating of >2.5. Based on review of the Plant Safety Analysis operation of this system is not of high significance. Reselected 290003 K3.03 3/2 G.2.2.19 Importance Rating <2.5. There is no site specific priority associated with this generic KA for the RO position. Reselected G.2.2.42 2/2 234000 K3.03 Rejected due to inability to write a discriminatory RO level question for this KA. Reselected 288000 K3.05 Rev 0 ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier / Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejection 1/2 295002 AA2.03 Importance rating <2.5. Based on review of Plant Safety Analysis this event is not of high significance. Re-selected 295002 AA2.01 2/1 261000 G.2.4.20 No credible tie for this generic KA exists for the system. Re-selected 261000 G.2.2.25 2/1 400000 G.2.2.39 No credible tie for this generic KA exists for the system. Re-selected 400000 G2.2.44 2/2 290002 G.2.4.35 No credible tie for this generic KA exists for the system. Re-selected 290002 G.2.4.23}}
2/2   239003 K2.01   This KA had an importance rating of <2.5. Based on review of the Plant Safety Analysis operation of this system is not of high significance. Reselected 239003 G.2.2.22. (There were no other K2 statements to select from).
2/2   290003 K2     There were no K2 item with an Importance Rating of >2.5. Based on review of the Plant Safety Analysis operation of this system is not of high significance. Reselected 290003 K3.03 3/2   G.2.2.19       Importance Rating <2.5. There is no site specific priority associated with this generic KA for the RO position. Reselected G.2.2.42 2/2   234000 K3.03   Rejected due to inability to write a discriminatory RO level question for this KA. Reselected 288000 K3.05 Rev 1
 
ES-401                   Record of Rejected K/As                             Form ES-401-4 Tier /     Randomly                            Reason for Rejection Group   Selected K/A 1/2   295002 AA2.03   Importance rating <2.5. Based on review of Plant Safety Analysis this event is not of high significance. Re-selected 295002 AA2.01 2/1   261000 G.2.4.20 No credible tie for this generic KA exists for the system. Re-selected 261000 G.2.2.25 2/1   400000 G.2.2.39 No credible tie for this generic KA exists for the system. Re-selected 400000 G2.2.44 2/2   290002 G.2.4.35 No credible tie for this generic KA exists for the system. Re-selected 290002 G.2.4.23 Rev 0}}

Latest revision as of 17:07, 13 November 2019

RB-2010-04-Final Rejected KAs
ML101960310
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/12/2010
From: Garchow S
Operations Branch IV
To:
Entergy Operations
References
50-458/10-04
Download: ML101960310 (2)
v • d • e


Text

ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected K/A 1/1 295027 EK3.02 River Bend design does not include containment spray mode.

Reselect 295027 EK3.01 1/2 295034 G.2.1.9 The RO would not perform this function. Reselected 295034 G.2.4.46 2/1 211000 G.2.4.3 No credible tie for this generic KA exists for the system. Reselected 211000 G.2.4.6 2/1 261000 K3.03 River Bend design includes a Mark III containment as opposed to a Mark I or II containment. Reselected 261000 K3.02 2/1 400000 K5.01 This KA had an importance rating of <2.5. Based on review of the Plant Safety Analysis operation of this system is not of high significance. Reselected 400000 A2.02. (There were no other K5 statements to select from).

2/2 239003 K2.01 This KA had an importance rating of <2.5. Based on review of the Plant Safety Analysis operation of this system is not of high significance. Reselected 239003 G.2.2.22. (There were no other K2 statements to select from).

2/2 290003 K2 There were no K2 item with an Importance Rating of >2.5. Based on review of the Plant Safety Analysis operation of this system is not of high significance. Reselected 290003 K3.03 3/2 G.2.2.19 Importance Rating <2.5. There is no site specific priority associated with this generic KA for the RO position. Reselected G.2.2.42 2/2 234000 K3.03 Rejected due to inability to write a discriminatory RO level question for this KA. Reselected 288000 K3.05 Rev 1

ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected K/A 1/2 295002 AA2.03 Importance rating <2.5. Based on review of Plant Safety Analysis this event is not of high significance. Re-selected 295002 AA2.01 2/1 261000 G.2.4.20 No credible tie for this generic KA exists for the system. Re-selected 261000 G.2.2.25 2/1 400000 G.2.2.39 No credible tie for this generic KA exists for the system. Re-selected 400000 G2.2.44 2/2 290002 G.2.4.35 No credible tie for this generic KA exists for the system. Re-selected 290002 G.2.4.23 Rev 0

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML101960310&oldid=2130791"