ML111110513: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Spring City, Tennessee 37381-2000
{{#Wiki_filter:Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Spring City, Tennessee 37381-2000 April 21, 2011 10 CFR 50.34 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-391
 
April 21, 2011  
 
10 CFR 50.34 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001  
 
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2   NRC Docket No. 50-391  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT (WBN) UNIT 2 - WITHDRAWAL OF A PREVIOUS COMMITMENT  
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT (WBN) UNIT 2 - WITHDRAWAL OF A PREVIOUS COMMITMENT


==Reference:==
==Reference:==
TVA letter dated June 28, 2010, "Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) Unit 2 - Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding Licensee's Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related to Section 4.2.2, 'Reactor Vessel Internal Components' (TAC No. ME2731)"
TVA letter dated June 28, 2010, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) Unit 2 -
The purpose of this letter is to withdraw a previous commitment made in the referenced letter. In that letter, TVA committed to replace prior to Unit 2 operation the current Unit 2 clevis insert bolts to a design which uses X-750 alloy with a high temperature heat (HTH) treatment, rolled threads, and a larger radius on the undercut of the cap screw head. Upon further evaluation, TVA has determined that this replacement is unwarranted at this time.
Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related to Section 4.2.2, Reactor Vessel Internal Components (TAC No. ME2731)
The justification for this withdrawal stems from the fact that the bolting failure phenomenon has only known to have occurred at one unit in the industry. The phenomenon appears to be time based, and the breakage only occurs after many operating cycles. In discussions with personnel at the affected plant, TVA has learned that the cause is not yet known and that any change might be at best neutral to solving the problem. TVA has also confirmed via these discussions that bolting at the affected plant's other unit does not have the same issue. In addition, WBN Unit 1 has operated with the same type bolting since 1995 with no failure of these bolts.  
The purpose of this letter is to withdraw a previous commitment made in the referenced letter.
In that letter, TVA committed to replace prior to Unit 2 operation the current Unit 2 clevis insert bolts to a design which uses X-750 alloy with a high temperature heat (HTH) treatment, rolled threads, and a larger radius on the undercut of the cap screw head. Upon further evaluation, TVA has determined that this replacement is unwarranted at this time.
The justification for this withdrawal stems from the fact that the bolting failure phenomenon has only known to have occurred at one unit in the industry. The phenomenon appears to be time based, and the breakage only occurs after many operating cycles. In discussions with personnel at the affected plant, TVA has learned that the cause is not yet known and that any change might be at best neutral to solving the problem. TVA has also confirmed via these discussions that bolting at the affected plants other unit does not have the same issue. In addition, WBN Unit 1 has operated with the same type bolting since 1995 with no failure of these bolts.
The initial NRC RAI cited the Staff Requirements Memorandum dated July 25, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML093370274) directing TVA to look for opportunities to resolve issues where the unirradiated state of WBN Unit Bar 2 makes the issue easier to resolve. At this time, the root cause of the subject issue has not been determined, an industry resolution has not been established, the problem appears to be restricted to a single unit at another utility, and WBN


The initial NRC RAI cited the Staff Requirements Memorandum dated July 25, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML093370274) directing TVA to look for opportunities to resolve issues where the unirradiated state of WBN Unit Bar 2 makes the issue easier to resolve. At this time, the root cause of the subject issue has not been determined, an industry resolution has not been established, the problem appears to be restricted to a single unit at another utility, and WBN U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 April 21, 2011 Unit 1 has operated with the X-750 bolting approximately sixteen years with no failure of these bolts.Even though WBN Unit 2 is not yet irradiated, TVA has decided to withdraw the previous commitment to replace the X-750 alloy insert bolts since replacement is not a definite solution for a near term problem.If you should have any questions, please call Bill Crouch at (423)365-2004.Respectfully, David Stinson Watts Bar Unit 2 Vice President cc: U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 NRC Resident Inspector Unit 2 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 1260 Nuclear Plant Road Spring City, Tennessee 37381}}
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 April 21, 2011 Unit 1 has operated with the X-750 bolting approximately sixteen years with no failure of these bolts. Even though WBN Unit 2 is not yet irradiated, TVA has decided to withdraw the previous commitment to replace the X-750 alloy insert bolts since replacement is not a definite solution for a near term problem.
If you should have any questions, please call Bill Crouch at (423) 365-2004.
Respectfully, David Stinson Watts Bar Unit 2 Vice President cc:   U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 NRC Resident Inspector Unit 2 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 1260 Nuclear Plant Road Spring City, Tennessee 37381}}

Latest revision as of 00:41, 13 November 2019

Withdrawal of a Previous Comment
ML111110513
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 04/21/2011
From: Stinson D
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TAC ME2731
Download: ML111110513 (2)
v • d • e


Text

Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Spring City, Tennessee 37381-2000 April 21, 2011 10 CFR 50.34 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-391

Subject:

WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT (WBN) UNIT 2 - WITHDRAWAL OF A PREVIOUS COMMITMENT

Reference:

TVA letter dated June 28, 2010, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) Unit 2 -

Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding Licensees Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment Related to Section 4.2.2, Reactor Vessel Internal Components (TAC No. ME2731)

The purpose of this letter is to withdraw a previous commitment made in the referenced letter.

In that letter, TVA committed to replace prior to Unit 2 operation the current Unit 2 clevis insert bolts to a design which uses X-750 alloy with a high temperature heat (HTH) treatment, rolled threads, and a larger radius on the undercut of the cap screw head. Upon further evaluation, TVA has determined that this replacement is unwarranted at this time.

The justification for this withdrawal stems from the fact that the bolting failure phenomenon has only known to have occurred at one unit in the industry. The phenomenon appears to be time based, and the breakage only occurs after many operating cycles. In discussions with personnel at the affected plant, TVA has learned that the cause is not yet known and that any change might be at best neutral to solving the problem. TVA has also confirmed via these discussions that bolting at the affected plants other unit does not have the same issue. In addition, WBN Unit 1 has operated with the same type bolting since 1995 with no failure of these bolts.

The initial NRC RAI cited the Staff Requirements Memorandum dated July 25, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML093370274) directing TVA to look for opportunities to resolve issues where the unirradiated state of WBN Unit Bar 2 makes the issue easier to resolve. At this time, the root cause of the subject issue has not been determined, an industry resolution has not been established, the problem appears to be restricted to a single unit at another utility, and WBN

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 April 21, 2011 Unit 1 has operated with the X-750 bolting approximately sixteen years with no failure of these bolts. Even though WBN Unit 2 is not yet irradiated, TVA has decided to withdraw the previous commitment to replace the X-750 alloy insert bolts since replacement is not a definite solution for a near term problem.

If you should have any questions, please call Bill Crouch at (423) 365-2004.

Respectfully, David Stinson Watts Bar Unit 2 Vice President cc: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 NRC Resident Inspector Unit 2 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 1260 Nuclear Plant Road Spring City, Tennessee 37381

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML111110513&oldid=2118729"