ML11334A151: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:31 PM To: Mozafari, Brenda
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                       Poehler, Jeffrey Sent:                       Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:31 PM To:                         Mozafari, Brenda


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FW: Summary of Conference CallBrenda, I am resending to correct some minor errors.  
FW: Summary of Conference Call Brenda, I am resending to correct some minor errors.
 
Jeff From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 3:46 PM To: Mozafari, Brenda
Jeff  
 
From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 3:46 PM To: Mozafari, Brenda  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Summary of Conference Call On the call were:
Summary of Conference Call On the call were:
Rich Rogalski - PEC Ted Huminski - PEC  
Rich Rogalski - PEC Ted Huminski - PEC Jeff Poehler - NRR/DE Brenda Mozafari - NRR/DORL Question:       Is licensees proposed schedule for Capsule U consistent with draft EPRI Report on Coordinated Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program?
 
Answer:          Yes EPRI recommended withdrawal in year 2020 at 38.36 EFPY and a fluence of 8.11 x 1019 n/cm . HBSEP is withdrawing at 38 EFPY and 7.84 x 1019 n/cm2.
Jeff Poehler - NRR/DE Brenda Mozafari - NRR/DORL Question:         Is licensee's proposed schedule for Capsule U consistent with draft EPRI Report on Coordinated Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program?  
2 Question:        What is the difference between the two slightly different neutron fluence values in the submittal of 7.79 x 1019 n/cm2 and 7.84 x 1019 n/cm2?
Answer:          7.79 x 1019 n/cm2 is the RV inner surface peak fluence at 66 EFPY and 7.84 x 1019 n/cm2 is the Capsule U fluence at 38 EFPY. The slight difference in values results because of the rounding of the EFPY to an even number (for the capsule withdrawal EFPY).
Question:        Are there any plans to reposition the two reserve capsules to higher flux locations?
Answer:          Yes, Note 3 to the table for the proposed schedule on page 3 states that Capsules Y and W will be repositioned after 40 years to accelerated flux positions to provide additional support for license extension.
The Reference to Note 2 next to Capsule Y and W should be to Note 3.
Question:        Is HBRSEP participating in an integrated surveillance program since they use Indian Point surveillance data as well as HBRSEP surveillance data in their credibility analysis for the surveillance weld metal in the Capsule X report?
Answer:          No, not an integrated surveillance program.
Thanks again for setting up the call, Jeffrey C. Poehler 1


Answer:          Yes EPRI recommended withdrawal in year 2020 at 38.36 EFPY and a fluence of 8.11 x 10 19 n/cm 2. HBSEP is withdrawing at 38 EFPY and 7.84 x 10 19 n/cm 2.
Sr. Materials Engineer NRR/DE/EVIB (301) 415-8353 2
Question:        What is the difference between the two slightly different neutron fluence values in the submittal of 7.79  x 10 19 n/cm 2 and  7.84 x 10 19 n/cm 2?
Answer:          7.79  x 10 19 n/cm 2 is the RV inner surface peak fluence at 66 EFPY and 7.84 x 10 19 n/cm 2 is the Capsule U fluence at 38 EFPY. The slight difference in values results because of the rounding of the EFPY to an even number (for the capsule withdrawal EFPY).


Question:        Are there any plans to reposition the two reserve capsules to higher flux locations?
Hearing Identifier:   NRR_PMDA Email Number:         213 Mail Envelope Properties     (Jeffrey.Poehler@nrc.gov20111130133100)
Answer:          Yes, Note 3 to the table for the proposed schedule on page 3 states that Capsules Y and W will be repositioned after 40 years to accelerated flux positions to provide additional support for license extension.
The Reference to Note 2 next to Capsule Y and W should be to Note 3.
 
Question:        Is HBRSEP participating in an integrated surveillance program since they use Indian Point surveillance data as well as HBRSEP surveillance data in their credibility analysis for the surveillance weld metal in the Capsule X report?
 
Answer:          No, not an integrated surveillance program.
 
Thanks again for setting up the call,  Jeffrey C. Poehler 2Sr. Materials Engineer NRR/DE/EVIB (301) 415-8353 Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 213   Mail Envelope Properties   (Jeffrey.Poehler@nrc.gov20111130133100)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FW: Summary of Conference Call Sent Date:   11/30/2011 1:31:06 PM Received Date: 11/30/2011 1:31:00 PM From:   Poehler, Jeffrey Created By:   Jeffrey.Poehler@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Mozafari, Brenda" <Brenda.Mozafari@nrc.gov>
FW: Summary of Conference Call Sent Date:             11/30/2011 1:31:06 PM Received Date:         11/30/2011 1:31:00 PM From:                 Poehler, Jeffrey Created By:           Jeffrey.Poehler@nrc.gov Recipients:
Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   2009     11/30/2011 1:31:00 PM
"Mozafari, Brenda" <Brenda.Mozafari@nrc.gov>
 
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Files                           Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                         2009                   11/30/2011 1:31:00 PM Options Priority:                       Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 11:18, 12 November 2019

FW: Summary of Conference Call
ML11334A151
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/2011
From: Jeffrey Poehler
Division of Engineering
To: Mozafari B
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
References
Download: ML11334A151 (3)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:31 PM To: Mozafari, Brenda

Subject:

FW: Summary of Conference Call Brenda, I am resending to correct some minor errors.

Jeff From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 3:46 PM To: Mozafari, Brenda

Subject:

Summary of Conference Call On the call were:

Rich Rogalski - PEC Ted Huminski - PEC Jeff Poehler - NRR/DE Brenda Mozafari - NRR/DORL Question: Is licensees proposed schedule for Capsule U consistent with draft EPRI Report on Coordinated Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program?

Answer: Yes EPRI recommended withdrawal in year 2020 at 38.36 EFPY and a fluence of 8.11 x 1019 n/cm . HBSEP is withdrawing at 38 EFPY and 7.84 x 1019 n/cm2.

2 Question: What is the difference between the two slightly different neutron fluence values in the submittal of 7.79 x 1019 n/cm2 and 7.84 x 1019 n/cm2?

Answer: 7.79 x 1019 n/cm2 is the RV inner surface peak fluence at 66 EFPY and 7.84 x 1019 n/cm2 is the Capsule U fluence at 38 EFPY. The slight difference in values results because of the rounding of the EFPY to an even number (for the capsule withdrawal EFPY).

Question: Are there any plans to reposition the two reserve capsules to higher flux locations?

Answer: Yes, Note 3 to the table for the proposed schedule on page 3 states that Capsules Y and W will be repositioned after 40 years to accelerated flux positions to provide additional support for license extension.

The Reference to Note 2 next to Capsule Y and W should be to Note 3.

Question: Is HBRSEP participating in an integrated surveillance program since they use Indian Point surveillance data as well as HBRSEP surveillance data in their credibility analysis for the surveillance weld metal in the Capsule X report?

Answer: No, not an integrated surveillance program.

Thanks again for setting up the call, Jeffrey C. Poehler 1

Sr. Materials Engineer NRR/DE/EVIB (301) 415-8353 2

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 213 Mail Envelope Properties (Jeffrey.Poehler@nrc.gov20111130133100)

Subject:

FW: Summary of Conference Call Sent Date: 11/30/2011 1:31:06 PM Received Date: 11/30/2011 1:31:00 PM From: Poehler, Jeffrey Created By: Jeffrey.Poehler@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Mozafari, Brenda" <Brenda.Mozafari@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2009 11/30/2011 1:31:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML11334A151&oldid=2109395"