ML14324A964: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML14324A964 | | number = ML14324A964 | ||
| issue date = 12/09/2014 | | issue date = 12/09/2014 | ||
| title = | | title = Acceptance Review of Proposed Changes to Quality Assurance Topical Report | ||
| author name = Miller G | | author name = Miller G | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | ||
| addressee name = Olivier J | | addressee name = Olivier J | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = 05000269, 05000270, 05000287, 05000369, 05000370, 05000413, 05000414 | | docket = 05000269, 05000270, 05000287, 05000369, 05000370, 05000413, 05000414 | ||
| license number = DPR-038, DPR-047, DPR-055, NPF-009, NPF-017, NPF-035, NPF-052 | | license number = DPR-038, DPR-047, DPR-055, NPF-009, NPF-017, NPF-035, NPF-052 | ||
| contact person = Miller G | | contact person = Miller G | ||
| case reference number = TAC MF5055, TAC MF5056, TAC MF5057, TAC MF5058, TAC MF5059, TAC MF5060, TAC MF5061 | | case reference number = TAC MF5055, TAC MF5056, TAC MF5057, TAC MF5058, TAC MF5059, TAC MF5060, TAC MF5061 | ||
| document type = Acceptance Review Letter | | document type = Acceptance Review Letter | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
| project = TAC: | | project = TAC:MF5055, TAC:MF5056, TAC:MF5057, TAC:MF5058, TAC:MF5059, TAC:MF5060, TAC:MF5061 | ||
| stage = Acceptance Review | | stage = Acceptance Review | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Ms. Julie Olivier Fleet Licensing Manager Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Mail Stop EC2ZF , 526 South Church St. Charlotte, NG 28202 | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 December 9, 2014 Ms. Julie Olivier Fleet Licensing Manager Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Mail Stop EC2ZF , | ||
526 South Church St. | |||
Charlotte, NG 28202 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; AND OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2; AND 3 -ACCEPTANCE REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO QUALITY ASSURANCE TOPICAL REPORT (TAC NOS. MF5055, MF5056, MF505.7, MF5058, MF5059, MF5060 AND MF5061) | CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; AND OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2; AND 3 -ACCEPTANCE REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO QUALITY ASSURANCE TOPICAL REPORT (TAC NOS. MF5055, MF5056, MF505.7, MF5058, MF5059, MF5060 AND MF5061) | ||
==Dear Ms. Olivier:== | ==Dear Ms. Olivier:== | ||
By letter dated October 23, 2014, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke, the licensee), submitted a request for NRC approval of a change to the Duke Quality Assurance Topical Report for Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; and Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. The proposed change would allow Duke to use the latest available Nuclear Information and Records Management Association (NIRMA) record standards. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed the information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the LAR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of the public health and safety and the environment. The NRC staff intends to complete its review of the requested change July, 2015. | |||
J. Olivier | By letter dated October 23, 2014, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke, the licensee), submitted a request for NRC approval of a change to the Duke Quality Assurance Topical Report for Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; and Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. The proposed change would allow Duke to use the latest available Nuclear Information and Records Management Association (NIRMA) record standards. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
}} | The NRC staff has reviewed the information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the LAR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of the public health and safety and the environment. The NRC staff intends to complete its review of the requested change July, 2015. | ||
J. Olivier If you have any questions, please call me at 301-415-2481. | |||
sG.frl<<\ | |||
G. Edward Miller, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-413, 50-414, 50-369, 50-370, 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287 cc: Distribution via Listserv | |||
ML14324A964 * *via e-mail OFFICE NRR/LPL2-1/PM NRR/LPL2-1/LA NRO/DCIP/QVIB/BC NRR/LPL2-1/BC NAME GEMiller SFigueroa KKavanaugh* RPascarelli DATE 12/09/14 11/25/14 11/18/14 12/09/14}} | |||
Latest revision as of 19:16, 31 October 2019
| ML14324A964 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee, Mcguire, Catawba, McGuire  |
| Issue date: | 12/09/2014 |
| From: | Geoffrey Miller Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Olivier J Duke Energy Carolinas |
| Miller G | |
| References | |
| TAC MF5055, TAC MF5056, TAC MF5057, TAC MF5058, TAC MF5059, TAC MF5060, TAC MF5061 | |
| Download: ML14324A964 (3) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 December 9, 2014 Ms. Julie Olivier Fleet Licensing Manager Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Mail Stop EC2ZF ,
526 South Church St.
Charlotte, NG 28202
SUBJECT:
CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; AND OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2; AND 3 -ACCEPTANCE REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO QUALITY ASSURANCE TOPICAL REPORT (TAC NOS. MF5055, MF5056, MF505.7, MF5058, MF5059, MF5060 AND MF5061)
Dear Ms. Olivier:
By letter dated October 23, 2014, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke, the licensee), submitted a request for NRC approval of a change to the Duke Quality Assurance Topical Report for Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; and Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. The proposed change would allow Duke to use the latest available Nuclear Information and Records Management Association (NIRMA) record standards. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed the information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the LAR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of the public health and safety and the environment. The NRC staff intends to complete its review of the requested change July, 2015.
J. Olivier If you have any questions, please call me at 301-415-2481.
sG.frl<<\
G. Edward Miller, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-413, 50-414, 50-369, 50-370, 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287 cc: Distribution via Listserv
ML14324A964 * *via e-mail OFFICE NRR/LPL2-1/PM NRR/LPL2-1/LA NRO/DCIP/QVIB/BC NRR/LPL2-1/BC NAME GEMiller SFigueroa KKavanaugh* RPascarelli DATE 12/09/14 11/25/14 11/18/14 12/09/14