ML15072A447: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Hon, Andrew To: Grzeck, Lee (Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com);
{{#Wiki_filter:Hon, Andrew To:                               Grzeck, Lee (Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com); Murray, William R. (Bill) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com)
Murray, William R. (Bill) energy.com) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com)
Cc:                               Helton, Shana; Johnson, Don; Hoffman, Raymond
Cc: Helton, Shana; Johnson, Don; Hoffman, Raymond  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Accepted for Review of License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme, TAC Nos MF5766 and MF5767 ADAMSAccessionNumber:
Accepted for Review of License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme, TAC Nos MF5766 and MF5767 ADAMSAccessionNumber:             ML15072A447 William R. Gideon Vice President Brunswick Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461
William R. Gideon Vice President Brunswick Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461  


==Dear Mr. Gideon:==
==Dear Mr. Gideon:==
ML15072A447 By letter dated January 30, 2014 (ADAMS NO ML15044A198), Duke Energy, the licensee, submitted the subject license amendment request for Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit 1 and 2. The purpose of this mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.
 
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
By letter dated January 30, 2014 (ADAMS NO ML15044A198), Duke Energy, the licensee, submitted the subject license amendment request for Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
If you have any questions, please contact me. (ADAMS Accession No. ML15072A447)
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Andy Hon, PE Project Manager (Watts Bar Nuclear Unit-1) Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-8480 OWFN08E5 Mail Stop 08G-9a andrew. hon@nrc.gov 1}}
If you have any questions, please contact me.
(ADAMS Accession No. ML15072A447)
Andy Hon, PE Project Manager (Watts Bar Nuclear Unit-1)
Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-8480 OWFN08E5 Mail Stop 08G-9a andrew. hon@nrc.gov 1}}

Revision as of 15:16, 31 October 2019

E-mail Re. Accepted for Review of License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme (TAC Nos. MF5766 and MF5767)
ML15072A447
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/13/2015
From: Andrew Hon
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Grzeck L, Murray W
Duke Energy Progress
Andy Hon
References
TAC MF5766, TAC MF5767
Download: ML15072A447 (1)
v • d • e


Text

Hon, Andrew To: Grzeck, Lee (Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com); Murray, William R. (Bill) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com)

Cc: Helton, Shana; Johnson, Don; Hoffman, Raymond

Subject:

Accepted for Review of License Amendment Request to Adopt Emergency Action Level Scheme, TAC Nos MF5766 and MF5767 ADAMSAccessionNumber: ML15072A447 William R. Gideon Vice President Brunswick Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461

Dear Mr. Gideon:

By letter dated January 30, 2014 (ADAMS NO ML15044A198), Duke Energy, the licensee, submitted the subject license amendment request for Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Unit 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

(ADAMS Accession No. ML15072A447)

Andy Hon, PE Project Manager (Watts Bar Nuclear Unit-1)

Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-8480 OWFN08E5 Mail Stop 08G-9a andrew. hon@nrc.gov 1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15072A447&oldid=2036103"