ML15260A344: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Qu:.:.:.a:.:.:.l:.....itc.!,.y
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201                                                                                                                   . :.....s...::..t_____...:::f:::::~o=r=m=-=E=S=-2 Examination Outline Qu:.:.:a.:.:.:l:. . . itc.!,.y_C:.....h:.....e:... c:..k.:.:.li                                             =0=1=-=2 Facility :                                                 Date of Examination :
_C:.....h:.....e:.....c:.....
Initials Item                                                     Task Description a          b*         c#
k.:.:.li:.....s...::..t _____ =E=S=-2=0=1=-=2 Fac ili ty: Date of Examination
: 1.     a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
: Initials Item T as k Description b* c# a 1. a. Verify that th e outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordan ce with ES-401. w R b. Assess whether the outline w a s systemat i cally and randomly p repar e d in accord anc e with I Section D.1 of ES-4 01 a nd wh eth er all K I A c ategories are appropr i atel y sampled. T T c. Assess whether the o ut line over-emphas i ze s any systems , evolutions , or generic topics. E N d. A ssess whether the j us t ifi c ations for deselected or rejected KIA statements are approp r iate. 2. s I M u L A T 0 R 3. w I T 4. G E N E R A L a. Using Form E S-301-5, verify tha t the proposed s c en ario sets cover the required nu mber o f normal ev o lutions , instrument and component fa ilu res , technical specifications , and major !_ransients
w R       b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accord ance with I           Section D.1 of ES-401 and wh eth er all KIA categories are appropriately sampled .
_____ _ b. Asse s s whether ther e are eno ugh s c enario sets (and s pares) to test the projected number and mi x of applicants in accordance with the e x pected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity , and ensure that each applicant can be tested using (},.. at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated l from the applicants
T T       c . Assess whether the outline over-emphas izes any systems, evolutions , or generic topics .
' audit test (s}, and that scenarios will not be repeated o n subseque nt d a ys. I c. To the extent possible , a ssess whether the outline(s) c onform(s) witl1 the qualitative er I t'A A-1 , and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. vu 1 --------+---+-a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is w ith in th e lim it s speci fi ed on the fo r m (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants
E N       d. A ssess whether the j ustifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
' audit test(s) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate p;ith, low-power, e mergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. b. Verify that the admi ni strative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: j (1) the tas k s are distributed among the topics as specified on the fo rm tV k-_ "'fn. (2) at leas t o ne task is new or significantly m o dified T ...... .,,. l (3) no mor e than one task is re peated from the last two_NRC l i cen s in g exami nat i ons_______ . c. Determi n e if there are enough di ffe rent outlines to test t he projected number and mix Q/ l. / o f and ensl!_fe items § __ re_d_u_p_li c_a_t_e_d_o_n_s_u_b_s_e __ q_u_e_nt_d_a_y_s_.
: 2.     a. Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failu res , technical specifications, s            and major !_ransients _____ _
__ ,_u_* ._.,'-'7' a. As sess w he t her plant-specific prior it ies (inc l udi ng PRA a nd IPE insights) are covered ll/ in the approp r i at e e x am sec ti ons. T CA}''? b. Asse ss wh eth er t h e 10 CF R 55.41/43 and 55.4 5 s ampling is a p p ropriat e. i L i ' ";-t ,-_ (0<oept '&deg;'
I M      b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number u            and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L            without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using                                                   (},..     ~
p!_lorit l;;;I ''-"' 2 ,; __ J .'l' I .i..;__ d. Check fo r duplication and overlap amon_g exam sections. . 9' e. Check the en tire exam for balance o f coverage. __
A            at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated                                                     l                 ~~1..
wh e th er t h e e xa m fits the ap p ro p r i at e j ob (R O or S RO). ___
T            from the applicants ' audit test(s}, and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days .                                                                       I 0
* a. Author b. Fa cilit y R e view e r(*) c NRC C h i e f Exa miner(#) d. NR C Supervisor Note: # Indep e ndent NRC reviewer initial items i n Col u mn "c"; chi ef examiner conc u rrenc e req uir ed.
R
* fo r NRC--prep are d ex aminat i o n outl ines !!==========================='}}
: c. To the extent possible , assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) witl1 the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D.
er        I
                                                                                                                                                                        ~- vu   t'AA-11,
                                                                                                                            --------+---+-
: 3.      a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -2 :
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w                  distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I            (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T            (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) j (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate p;ith, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form .
: b. Verify that the admi nistrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 - 1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the fo rm                                                               tV           k-_ "'fn.
(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified                                                                                T                   .......,,. l (3) no more than one task is re peated from the last two_NRC licen sing exami nations__                                    _ ____                                      .
: c. Determine if there are enough diffe rent outlines to test the projected number and mix                                                   Q/ l .               ~      /
of applica_'.l~S and ensl!_fe tha~ items &sect;_re                                      e_nt_d_a_y_s_.---------+-r--1-~ ,_u_
_ d_u_p_lic_a_t_e_d_o_n_s_u_b_s_e__q_u_                                                                __         * ~_.'?"'
_*"._.,
                                                                                                                                                                                              '-'
7 '
: 4.      a. Assess w hether plant-specific priorities (includi ng PRA and IPE insights) are covered                                                     ll/       ~
in the appropriate exam secti ons.                                                                                                       T               CA}''?
G E      b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.                                                               i L i <..f~              '       ";-t N
E      , -_ Eo."~~,;;;;;;;;;:;.""'' (0<oept '&deg;' pl.ot-,pe~fio p!_loritl;;;I '"'~' ''-"' 2,; __ J.' l' I.i..;__ ~
R      d . Check for duplication and overlap amon_g exam sections.                                                                     .             9'       ~-~-+--u A
L      e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage .                                                                             ~4'_J._w--_+""'"'--,'--ll n----~-f_._ _Ass~ss whether the exa m fits the appropriate job le~el (RO or SRO) .                                                           ___       *            ' , J~"
: a. Author b . Facility Reviewer(*)
c   NRC Chief Examiner(#)
d . NRC Supervisor Note :                   # Indepe ndent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner conc urrence req uired .
                            * ~ot a e_plica~ le fo r NRC--prepared examination outlines
!!==========================='}}

Revision as of 07:34, 31 October 2019

2015 Duane Arnold Energy Center Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2
ML15260A344
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/20/2015
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
NextEra Energy Duane Arnold
Zoia, C D
Shared Package
ML15118A361 List:
References
Download: ML15260A344 (1)


Text

ES-201 . :.....s...::..t_____...:::f:::::~o=r=m=-=E=S=-2 Examination Outline Qu:.:.:a.:.:.:l:. . . itc.!,.y_C:.....h:.....e:... c:..k.:.:.li =0=1=-=2 Facility : Date of Examination :

Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

w R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accord ance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and wh eth er all KIA categories are appropriately sampled .

T T c . Assess whether the outline over-emphas izes any systems, evolutions , or generic topics .

E N d. A ssess whether the j ustifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

2. a. Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failu res , technical specifications, s and major !_ransients _____ _

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using (},.. ~

A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated l ~~1..

T from the applicants ' audit test(s}, and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days . I 0

R

c. To the extent possible , assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) witl1 the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D.

er I

~- vu t'AA-11,


+---+-

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -2 :

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) j (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate p;ith, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form .

b. Verify that the admi nistrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 - 1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the fo rm tV k-_ "'fn.

(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified T .......,,. l (3) no more than one task is re peated from the last two_NRC licen sing exami nations__ _ ____ .

c. Determine if there are enough diffe rent outlines to test the projected number and mix Q/ l . ~ /

of applica_'.l~S and ensl!_fe tha~ items §_re e_nt_d_a_y_s_.---------+-r--1-~ ,_u_

_ d_u_p_lic_a_t_e_d_o_n_s_u_b_s_e__q_u_ __ * ~_.'?"'

_*"._.,

'-'

7 '

4. a. Assess w hether plant-specific priorities (includi ng PRA and IPE insights) are covered ll/ ~

in the appropriate exam secti ons. T CA}?

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. i L i <..f~ ' ";-t N

E , -_ Eo."~~,;;;;;;;;;:;."" (0<oept '°' pl.ot-,pe~fio p!_loritl;;;I '"'~' -"' 2,; __ J.' l' I.i..;__ ~

R d . Check for duplication and overlap amon_g exam sections. . 9' ~-~-+--u A

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage . ~4'_J._w--_+""'"'--,'--ll n----~-f_._ _Ass~ss whether the exa m fits the appropriate job le~el (RO or SRO) . ___ * ' , J~"

a. Author b . Facility Reviewer(*)

c NRC Chief Examiner(#)

d . NRC Supervisor Note : # Indepe ndent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner conc urrence req uired .

  • ~ot a e_plica~ le fo r NRC--prepared examination outlines

!!==========================='