ML16341E037: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301Simulator Scenario Quality Ghecklist Form ES-301-4Facility:
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301                                      Simulator Scenario Quality Ghecklist                                   Form ES-301-4 Facility: O     c Co-C             Date of Exam:lulC         Scenario Numbers:   I I z l3 t¿4 I f      Operating Test No.
O c Co-C Date of Exam:lulC Scenario Numbers:
lnitials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a    b*     c#
I I z l3 t¿4 If Operating Test No.QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES lnitialsab*c#1The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service,but it does not cue the operators into expected events.1/5rs2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.3Ks3. Each event description consists of. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
1    The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.                                                       1/     5r s
. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew. the expected operator actions (by shift position) o the event termination point (if applicable) 5,fPe4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics 6/P-.n5Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain completeevaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
: 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.                                                                       3K s
ó('L/.a6lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
: 3. Each event description consists of
Operators have sufficient time to cany out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given.nlnulû.f7. The simulator modeling is not altered.5KPl8. The scenarios have been validated.
      .     the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d),
      .     the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event
any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
      .     the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
,,faFd9. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
      .     the expected operator actions (by shift position) o     the event termination point (if applicable)                                                                     5,f Pe
All otherscenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301,áúZn10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit theform along with the simulator scenarios).
: 4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics                                                         6/ P-.n 'L/
561 1. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors.  
5    Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.                                                           ó(     .a 6    lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
(Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
Operators have sufficient time to cany out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given.                                                                                                 nln ulû .f
tffrd\12. ach applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
: 7. The simulator modeling is not altered.                                                                                 5K Pl
5{l,s13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew positionó(sTarget Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)Actual Attributes
: 8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional a
: 1. Malfunctions after EOP entry ('l-2)3 tU I/uZt(R-2. Abnormal events (2-4)q t, vt,4 q(R,3. Major transients (1-2)1 ttt t ttl I3l.c<4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)I ttll tLtL5f?r't5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actons (0-2)t ll I lol 6KP-n6. EOP based Critical tasks (2-3)'L tzt z t7t L*).r:. The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.# lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chiefexaminer concurrence required.
fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.                                                           ,,f      Fd
NOTEtarLL V*ry bq9r;c &#xbf;rStTE \tAurtt on/ . l*fS 'ffia"}}
: 9. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301,                                                 &#xe1;&#xfa; Zn
: 10. All   individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).                                                                             56 1 1. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)                               tf frd\
: 12. ach applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).                                                       5{ l,s
: 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate   to support licensing decisions for each crew position                           &#xf3;( s Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)                     Actual Attributes
: 1.         Malfunctions after EOP entry ('l-2)                                                 3 tU   I/uZ                  t( R-
: 2.         Abnormal events (2-4)                                                               q   t, vt,4   q           (     R,
: 3.         Major transients (1-2)                                                               1 ttt t ttl   I            3l    .c<
: 4.         EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)                                     I ttll     tLtL            5f      ?r't
: 5.         EOP contingencies requiring substantive actons (0-2)                               t ll I lol 6                K      P-n
: 6.         EOP based Critical tasks (2-3)                                                     'L tzt z t7t L                 *)     .r:
NOTE            . The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
                # lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
tarLL Vry        bq9r;c &#xbf;rStTE \tAurtt on/                 . l*fS 'ffia"}}

Latest revision as of 11:37, 30 October 2019

DC Cook 2016 ES-301-4 Scenario Quality Checklist
ML16341E037
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 12/02/2016
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
Indiana Michigan Power Co, American Electric Power
Shared Package
ML15274A375 List:
References
Download: ML16341E037 (1)
v • d • e


Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Ghecklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: O c Co-C Date of Exam:lulC Scenario Numbers: I I z l3 t¿4 I f Operating Test No.

lnitials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c#

1 The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 1/ 5r s

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. 3K s
3. Each event description consists of

. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event

. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

. the expected operator actions (by shift position) o the event termination point (if applicable) 5,f Pe

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics 6/ P-.n 'L/

5 Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ó( .a 6 lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to cany out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given. nln ulû .f

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. 5K Pl
8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional a

fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. ,,f Fd

9. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301, áú Zn
10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). 56 1 1. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) tf frd\
12. ach applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). 5{ l,s
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position ó( s Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes
1. Malfunctions after EOP entry ('l-2) 3 tU I/uZ t( R-
2. Abnormal events (2-4) q t, vt,4 q ( R,
3. Major transients (1-2) 1 ttt t ttl I 3l .c<
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) I ttll tLtL 5f ?r't
5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actons (0-2) t ll I lol 6 K P-n
6. EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 'L tzt z t7t L *) .r:

NOTE . The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

  1. lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

tarLL Vry bq9r;c ¿rStTE \tAurtt on/ . l*fS 'ffia"

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16341E037&oldid=2014769"