ML17289B167: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 02/12/1993 | | issue date = 02/12/1993 | ||
| title = LER 88-031-01:on 880902,determined That Due to Single Failure CR HVAC Sys Could Operate in Recirculation Mode. Caused by Lack of Communication Between Ae Design Groups.Cr HVAC Recirculation Mode of Operation analyzed.W/930212 Ltr | | title = LER 88-031-01:on 880902,determined That Due to Single Failure CR HVAC Sys Could Operate in Recirculation Mode. Caused by Lack of Communication Between Ae Design Groups.Cr HVAC Recirculation Mode of Operation analyzed.W/930212 Ltr | ||
| author name = | | author name = Baker J, Fies C | ||
| author affiliation = WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM | | author affiliation = WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:DOCUIVIENT SYSTEM ACCELERATE REGULARLY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIO DISTRIBUTION YSTEM (RIDS) | ||
NO DOCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2 Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION FIESPC.L.Washington Public Power Supply System BAKER,J.W. | ACCESSION NBR:9302220096 DOC.DATE: 93/02/12 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2 Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION FIESPC.L. Washington Public Power Supply System BAKER,J.W. Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION | ||
Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
LER 88-031-01:on 880902,determined that due to single failure CR HVAC sys could operate in recirculation mode.Caused by lack of communication between AE design groups.CR HVAC recirculation mode of operation analyzed.W/930212 ltr.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED:LTR j ENCL | LER 88-031-01:on 880902,determined that due to single failure CR HVAC sys could operate in recirculation mode. D Caused by lack of communication between AE design groups.CR HVAC recirculation mode of operation analyzed.W/930212 ltr. | ||
PLEASE HELP VS TO REDUCE WASTEI CONTACT THE DOCVMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.504-2065)TO | DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED:LTR j ENCL TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc. | ||
NOTES: | |||
j SIZE: C RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL D PD5 LA 1 1 PD5 PD 1 1 CLIFFORDPJ 1 1 D INTERNAL: ACNW 2 2 ACRS 2 2 AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1 1 AEOD/ROAB/DSP 2 2 NRR/DET/EMEB 7E 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LHFB10 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OEAB 1 1 NRR/DREP/PRPBll 2 2 NRR/DST/SELB 8D 1 1 NRR/DST/SICB8H3 1 1 D SPLB8D1 1 1 NRR/DST/SRXB 8E 1 1 EG FIL 02 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 RGN5 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: EGGG BRYCE,J.H 2 2 L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC MURPHYPG.A 1 1 NSIC POOREPW 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 D | |||
D D | |||
NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS: | |||
S PLEASE HELP VS TO REDUCE WASTEI CONTACT THE DOCVMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATEYOVR NAME FROM DISTRIBVTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOV DONT NEEDl FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 31 ENCL 31 | |||
vi WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968 ~ 3000 George Washington Way ~ Richland, Washington 99352 February 12, 1993 G02-93-032 Docket No. 50-397 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
NUCLEAR PLANT WNP-2, OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT NO.88-031-01 Transmitted herewith is Licensee Event Report No.88-031-01 for the WNP-2 Plant.This revised report is submitted in response to the requirements of 10CFR50.73. | NUCLEAR PLANT WNP-2, OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT NO. 88-031-01 Transmitted herewith is Licensee Event Report No. 88-031-01 for the WNP-2 Plant. This revised report is submitted in response to the requirements of 10CFR50.73. It provides an update of the corrective actions and an evaluation of the safety significance that was not available for the original report. | ||
It provides an update of the corrective actions and an evaluation of the safety significance that was not available for the original report.Sincerely, J.W.Baker WNP-2 Plant Manager (Mail Drop 927M)JWB/CLF/my | Sincerely, J. W. Baker WNP-2 Plant Manager (Mail Drop 927M) | ||
( | JWB/CLF/my Enclosure 1901.24 CC: Mr. J. B. Martin, NRC - Region V Mr. R. Barr, NRC Resident Inspector (Mail Drop 901A, 2 Copies) | ||
INPO Records Center - Atlanta, GA Mr. D. L. Williams, BPA (Mail Drop 399) 9302220096 930212 PDR ADOCK 05000397 S PDR | |||
This unanalyzed condition was found while performing an engineering evaluation of the safety significance of the event reported in LER 88-005-00. | |||
During a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA)the normal fresh air intake for the Control Room HVAC is isolated and two remote air intake lines are opened.Each remote air intake line has two isolation valves and one valve is powered from Division 1 and the other from Division 2.A single failure (not a loss of power failure)in a power division could cause a valve in each remote air intake line to isolate.With the loss of all fresh air input the Control Room HVAC would continue to operate but in the recirculation mode.In the recirculation mode the Control Room would not remain pressurized with respect to surrounding areas, and operating post LOCA in this mode was not an analyzed condition. | LICENSEE EV T REPORT (LER) | ||
Immediate corrective actions were: The motor operators for the four (two per line)remote air intake isolation valves were replaced with manual operators. | ACILITY NAME (I) DOCKET HUMB R ( ) PAGE (3) | ||
Two of the four.radiation purge line isolation valves motor operators were electrically disconnected. | Washin ton Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 0 5 0 0 0 3 9 7 I DF 7 TITLE (4) | ||
Both isolation valves in the remote intake lines were locked open to assure that a single failure could not result in recirculation mode operation. | SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROOM HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZEDOPERATION MODE DUE TO DESIGN EVENT DATE (5) LER NUMBER 6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8) | ||
The Control Room Emergency Filtration System was started and the Control Room HVAC System is operating in the pressurization mode. | MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL EV I SION MONTH DAY YEAR FACILITY NAMES 00 CKET HUMBERS(S) | ||
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR ER)TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAME (1) | NUMBER UMBER 5 0 0 9 0 2 8 8 8 8 0 3 1 0 I 0 2 I 2 9 3 050 PERATING HIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 5: (Check one or more of the following) (11) | ||
A letter was sent to Burns&Roe Inc.providing notification of a potential 10CFR Part 21 condition. | ODE (9) 4 ONER LEVEL 20.402(b) 20.405(C) 50.73(a)(2)(iv) 77.71(b) | ||
PI n Con i ion Power Level-0%Plant Mode-4 (Cold Shutdown)Event De ri ti n On September 2, 1988, a Design Engineer determined that, due to single failures, the Control Room Heating and Ventilation (HVAC)System could operate during emergency conditions in the recirculation mode, which is an unanalyzed condition. | (10) 20.405(a)(1)(i) 50.36(c)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v) 73.73(c) 0 0 0 20.405(a)(1)(ii) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vii) THER (Specify in Abstract 20.405(a)(1)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) clew and in Text, NRC 20.405(a)(1)(iv) X 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) orm 366A) 0.405(a)(1)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(x) | ||
This unanalyzed condition was discovered while performing an engineering evaluation committed to in LER 88-005-00 to evaluate the potential effects of minor Control Room HVAC system changes on system bypass flow.The following brief description of the Control Room HVAC System (before modification) for normal operation and emergency operation during a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA)is presented to aid in understanding the event and the changes made to the system.Figure 1 is a partial diagram of the Control Room HVAC System prior to the event.The Control Room HVAC System consists of two redundant systems for both normal and emergency operation. | LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12) | ||
During normal operation, 1000 cfm of fresh air from the normal roof intake Radwaste Building is mixed with 20,000 cfm of recirculated air (through fan 51A or 51B).Seven hundred and fifty (750)cfm is exhausted from the control room through fan 51 and the remaining 250 cfm pressurizes the control room and is exfiltrated. | NAME TELEPHOHE NUMBER REA CODE C. L. Fies, Licensing Engineer 5 0 9 7 7 - 4 1 4 7 COMPLETE OHE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IH THIS REPORT (13) | ||
Also during normal operation, the remote air intake isolation valves (51A and B and 52A and B)are closed and the radiation monitor purge line valves (51D and E and 52D and E)are open with radiation monitor purge line fans 53A and B operating. | CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MAHUFACTURER EPORTABLE CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE 0 HPRDS TO NPRDS 2;l, REPORT EXPECTED (14) .'UPPLEMENTAL EXPEC'TED SUBMISSION MONTH DAY YEAR ATE (15) | ||
During a LOCA when any of the following trip levels are reached 1)High drywell pressure ("F" signal), 2)Low low reactor water level ("A" signal)or 3)Reactor building ventilation exhaust high radiation ("Z" signal)the following actions occur: a)The normal roof intake Radwaste Building is isolated by closing valves 51C and 52C. | YES (If es c iete EXPECTED SUBMISSIOH DATE) NO TAACT OOI On September 2, 1988, a Design Engineer determined that due to a single failure the Control Room Heating and Ventilation (HVAC) System could operate in the recirculation mode during emergency conditions. This unanalyzed condition was found while performing an engineering evaluation of the safety significance of the event reported in LER 88-005-00. | ||
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR LER)TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAME (1) | During a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) the normal fresh air intake for the Control Room HVAC is isolated and two remote air intake lines are opened. Each remote air intake line has two isolation valves and one valve is powered from Division 1 and the other from Division 2. A single failure (not a loss of power failure) in a power division could cause a valve in each remote air intake line to isolate. With the loss of all fresh air input the Control Room HVAC would continue to operate but in the recirculation mode. In the recirculation mode the Control Room would not remain pressurized with respect to surrounding areas, and operating post LOCA in this mode was not an analyzed condition. | ||
c)The remote air intake isolation valves (51A, 51B, 52A, and 52B)open and the radiation monitor purge line isolation valves (51D, 51E, 52D and 52E)close.The remote air intake isolation valves and the radiation monitor purge line isolation valves are interlocked so when an intake line is opened the associated purge line is isolated.d)The control room emergency filtration system is automatically started and draws 1000 cfm of fresh air through the remote air intakes.This additional air, when added to the recirculated air, pressurizes the control room.The event described in LER 88-005 was for leakage around the emergency filters in excess of the technical specification allowable limit.During the engineering evaluation committed to in LER 88-005 to determine the effect of the excess leakage on control room habitability, a design engineer determined that postulated single failures could cause some combination of remote air intake line isolation valves to fail to open or to reisolate and;thus, isolate both remote air intake lines.If this condition existed during LOCA conditions, the Control Room HVAC would be running in a recirculation mode only since the normal roof intake is also isolated.In the recirculation mode the 20,000 cfm would continue to be drawn from the control room and recirculated back to the control room;however, without the fresh air input the control room would not be pressurized. | Immediate corrective actions were: The motor operators for the four (two per line) remote air intake isolation valves were replaced with manual operators. Two of the four. radiation purge line isolation valves motor operators were electrically disconnected. Both isolation valves in the remote intake lines were locked open to assure that a single failure could not result in recirculation mode operation. The Control Room Emergency Filtration System was started and the Control Room HVAC System is operating in the pressurization mode. | ||
In a neutral pressure condition the inleakage to the control room would increase and this condition is not analyzed.Imm iateAci n The planned Plant Startup was delayed until the following actions were completed. | |||
1)The motor operators were removed and manual operators were installed on the remote air intake isolation valves (51A and B and 52A and B).The valve operators were changed to manual so the isolation valves on the remote intake lines could be opened without an FAZ signal present;thereby, assuring that a single failure could not cause operation in the recirculation mode.With the remote air intake lines open, the control room emergency filtration system is started, fan 51 is deenergized, and the associated damper is closed.This put the Control Room HVAC system in the pressurization mode of operation which satisfied the action statement of Technical Specification 3.3.7.1.The current Plant configuration has both remote intakes open during normal operation. | LICENSEE EVENT REPOR ER) | ||
Figure 2 shows the post event Control Room HVAC configuration. | TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (8) AGE (3) ear umber ev. No. | ||
2)Two of the radiation purge line isolation valve electro-pneumatic operator motors (52D and 51E)were electrically disconnected which causes the valves to open.This was done so that only one manual action is required to isolate a remote path and cause the associated purge path to open or vice versa.3)The 750 cfm control room exhaust fan (51)was deenergized. | Washington Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 8 3 1 1 2 OF 7 TiTLE (4) | ||
4)Specific directions for Plant Operators to execute to maintain design bases in the event of a LOCA were provided in (approved) deviated Plant procedures. | SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROON HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZED OPERATION NODE DUE TO DESIGN Ab tract nt'd The cause of this event was the Plant Architect/Engineer (AE) did not provide a Control Room HVAC System design which protected the system against all possible single failures. The root cause of this event is a lack of communication between AE design groups. | ||
Each new operations crew was provided training by Operation Managers. | Further corrective actions were taken: The Control Room HVAC recirculation mode of operation was analyzed. Technical Specification Amendment No. 74 was received allowing Control Room HVAC operation with the revised configuration. A letter was sent to Burns & Roe Inc. providing notification of a potential 10CFR Part 21 condition. | ||
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR LER)TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAHE (I) | PI n Con i ion Power Level - 0% | ||
There were no structures, systems, or components inoperable prior to this event which contributed to the event.The cause of this event was the failure of the Plant Architect/Engineer (Burns&Roe Inc.)to provide a system design for which a single failure could not isolate both remote air intakes and cause the Control Room HVAC System to operate in the recirculation mode, or to analyze the recirculation mode of operation. | Plant Mode - 4 (Cold Shutdown) | ||
The root cause of this event is a lack of communication between the Architect/Engineer design groups.B.Further Corrective Action 1)The Control Room HVAC recirculation mode of operation was analyzed.The results are summarized under safety significance below.2)Technical Specification Amendment 74 was received allowing operation of the Control Room HVAC system in the revised configuration. | Event De ri ti n On September 2, 1988, a Design Engineer determined that, due to single failures, the Control Room Heating and Ventilation (HVAC) System could operate during emergency conditions in the recirculation mode, which is an unanalyzed condition. This unanalyzed condition was discovered while performing an engineering evaluation committed to in LER 88-005-00 to evaluate the potential effects of minor Control Room HVAC system changes on system bypass flow. | ||
3)A letter was sent to Burns&Roe Inc., providing notification of a potential 10CFR Part 21 condition. | The following brief description of the Control Room HVAC System (before modification) for normal operation and emergency operation during a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) is presented to aid in understanding the event and the changes made to the system. Figure 1 is a partial diagram of the Control Room HVAC System prior to the event. The Control Room HVAC System consists of two redundant systems for both normal and emergency operation. During normal operation, 1000 cfm of fresh air from the normal roof intake Radwaste Building is mixed with 20,000 cfm of recirculated air (through fan 51A or 51B). Seven hundred and fifty (750) cfm is exhausted from the control room through fan 51 and the remaining 250 cfm pressurizes the control room and is exfiltrated. Also during normal operation, the remote air intake isolation valves (51A and B and 52A and B) are closed and the radiation monitor purge line valves (51D and E and 52D and E) are open with radiation monitor purge line fans 53A and B operating. During a LOCA when any of the following trip levels are reached 1) High drywell pressure | ||
~Sf ii lit~i The safety significance of operation in the recirculation mode has been evaluated. | ("F" signal), 2) Low low reactor water level ("A" signal) or 3) Reactor building ventilation exhaust high radiation ("Z" signal) the following actions occur: | ||
The results are documented in Technical Memorandum TM-1158, Revision 4.The calculation assumed Control Room inleakage in the range of 350 to 450 cubic feet per minute.The calculated whole body gamma dose and skin beta dose were within limits.However, the calculated thyroid dose was approximately 100 Rem which exceeds the Standard Review Plan 6.4 limit of 30 Rem.It is therefore concluded that this event has safety significance as a single failure during LOCA conditions could have resulted in Licensing Basis Document (LBD)limits being exceeded.imil r Ev n None LICENSEE EVENT REPOR ER)TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAME (1) | a) The normal roof intake Radwaste Building is isolated by closing valves 51C and 52C. | ||
Control Room Emergency Filtration System Fan 51A or 51B 750 cfm Control Room Exhaust Fan (51)Radiation Purge Live Exhaust Fans (53A and B) | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR LER) | |||
TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAME (1) OOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (B) AGE (3) ear umber ev. No. | |||
Washington Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 0 5 0 0 0 3 9 7 I | |||
8 031 01 3 F 7 1TLE (4) | |||
SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROOM HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZED OPERATION MODE, DUE TO DESIGN b) The 750 cfm control room exhaust fan (51) deenergizes. | |||
c) The remote air intake isolation valves (51A, 51B, 52A, and 52B) open and the radiation monitor purge line isolation valves (51D, 51E, 52D and 52E) close. The remote air intake isolation valves and the radiation monitor purge line isolation valves are interlocked so when an intake line is opened the associated purge line is isolated. | |||
d) The control room emergency filtration system is automatically started and draws 1000 cfm of fresh air through the remote air intakes. This additional air, when added to the recirculated air, pressurizes the control room. | |||
The event described in LER 88-005 was for leakage around the emergency filters in excess of the technical specification allowable limit. During the engineering evaluation committed to in LER 88-005 to determine the effect of the excess leakage on control room habitability, a design engineer determined that postulated single failures could cause some combination of remote air intake line isolation valves to fail to open or to reisolate and; thus, isolate both remote air intake lines. If this condition existed during LOCA conditions, the Control Room HVAC would be running in a recirculation mode only since the normal roof intake is also isolated. In the recirculation mode the 20,000 cfm would continue to be drawn from the control room and recirculated back to the control room; however, without the fresh air input the control room would not be pressurized. In a neutral pressure condition the inleakage to the control room would increase and this condition is not analyzed. | |||
Imm iateAci n The planned Plant Startup was delayed until the following actions were completed. 1) The motor operators were removed and manual operators were installed on the remote air intake isolation valves (51A and B and 52A and B). The valve operators were changed to manual so the isolation valves on the remote intake lines could be opened without an FAZ signal present; thereby, assuring that a single failure could not cause operation in the recirculation mode. With the remote air intake lines open, the control room emergency filtration system is started, fan 51 is deenergized, and the associated damper is closed. This put the Control Room HVAC system in the pressurization mode of operation which satisfied the action statement of Technical Specification 3.3.7.1. The current Plant configuration has both remote intakes open during normal operation. Figure 2 shows the post event Control Room HVAC configuration. 2) Two of the radiation purge line isolation valve electro-pneumatic operator motors (52D and 51E) were electrically disconnected which causes the valves to open. This was done so that only one manual action is required to isolate a remote path and cause the associated purge path to open or vice versa. 3) The 750 cfm control room exhaust fan (51) was deenergized. 4) Specific directions for Plant Operators to execute to maintain design bases in the event of a LOCA were provided in (approved) deviated Plant procedures. Each new operations crew was provided training by Operation Managers. | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR LER) | |||
TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAHE (I) 00CKET NUHBER (2) LER NUHBER (8) AGE (3) | |||
Year umber ev. No. | |||
Washington Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 0 3 9 7 0 5 0 0 8 031 01 4 F 7 TITLE (4) | |||
SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROOM HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZED OPERATION MODE DUE TO DESIGN Further Evaluati n and orrective Action A. Further Evaluation This event was reported per 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(i) on September 2, 1988 at 1702 hours. The event is also reported per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A). | |||
There were no structures, systems, or components inoperable prior to this event which contributed to the event. | |||
The cause of this event was the failure of the Plant Architect/Engineer (Burns & Roe Inc.) to provide a system design for which a single failure could not isolate both remote air intakes and cause the Control Room HVAC System to operate in the recirculation mode, or to analyze the recirculation mode of operation. The root cause of this event is a lack of communication between the Architect/Engineer design groups. | |||
B. Further Corrective Action | |||
: 1) The Control Room HVAC recirculation mode of operation was analyzed. The results are summarized under safety significance below. | |||
: 2) Technical Specification Amendment 74 was received allowing operation of the Control Room HVAC system in the revised configuration. | |||
: 3) A letter was sent to Burns & Roe Inc., providing notification of a potential 10CFR Part 21 condition. | |||
~Sf ii lit~i The safety significance of operation in the recirculation mode has been evaluated. The results are documented in Technical Memorandum TM-1158, Revision 4. The calculation assumed Control Room inleakage in the range of 350 to 450 cubic feet per minute. The calculated whole body gamma dose and skin beta dose were within limits. However, the calculated thyroid dose was approximately 100 Rem which exceeds the Standard Review Plan 6.4 limit of 30 Rem. It is therefore concluded that this event has safety significance as a single failure during LOCA conditions could have resulted in Licensing Basis Document (LBD) limits being exceeded. | |||
imil r Ev n None | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR ER) | |||
TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAME (1) OOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (8) AGE (3) ear '(umber ev. No. | |||
Washington Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 0 0 0 3 9 0 5 7 8 031 01 5 OF 7 ITLE (4) | |||
SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROOM HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZED OPERATION MODE DUE TO DESIGN E~f Tex R f ren f* | |||
m~mm~nen | |||
/~Lcm Control Room Heating and Ventilation VH (HVAC) System Normal Fresh Air Intake (Normal Roof Intake VH Radwaste Building) | |||
Remote Air Intake Line, (East or West) VH Remote Air Intake Isolation Valves (51A and VH ISV B and 52A and B) | |||
Remote Air Intake Isolation Valve Motor 84 Operator (Electro-Pneumatic Motor Operator) | |||
Radiation Purge Line Isolation Valves (51D ISV and E and 52D and E) | |||
Radiation Purge Line Isolation Valve Motor VH 84 Operator (Electro-Pneumatic Motor Operators) | |||
Control Room Emergency Filtration System FAN Fan 51A or 51B 750 cfm Control Room Exhaust Fan (51) VH FAN Radiation Purge Live Exhaust Fans (53A VH FAN and B) | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR ER) | |||
TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY HAHE (I) OOCKET HUHBER (2) LER HUHBER (8) AGE (3) ear umber ev. Ho. | |||
Washington Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 0 3 9 0 5 0 0 7 8 031 1 6 F 7 ITLE (4) | |||
SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROON HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZED OPERATION NODE DUE TO DESIGN VALVES CLOSC NORHAI ROOF ON HIGH-HJQI INTAKC RADIATION ALARM RADVASTE I VALVES I <TYPICAL> BLDG ', I vhLvcs I RCHOTE OPEN OW I OPQ< OJJ I RLHOTE INTAKC FAX 0 FAX OITAKC I I 01 EHO 5IC DIV I lz I I <EASTI CLOSC OM fAX I L Rc gna>>>> RC J r-" M 0 | |||
SIKE 52C DIV ll IV RC 11 | |||
~ 5 IA 5ZA Dlv I 5<A-I DIV ll 50B-I 52B 5IB + | |||
DIV I DIV Il I FGDIV II DJV II I I Dlv I I | |||
EHER6 CHER G I FILTER FILTER RR TYPICAL AH I I II TYPICAL I I 5IA-I IB "I II I I FAN 50A I DIV I V II FAM 50B II I I DIV DIV II II I I II II | |||
.r" L I I | |||
'~JI FAN 51A FAN 5IB I Dlv I Dlv 11 I I I I I I CONTROL ROON 0 | |||
EHO 5ID FO DIV I EHO 52DFO Dlv 11 154 CTH | |||
~ FO Dlv EHO Il FO EHO DIV'I FAH 53A'AH II DIV I DIV 53B 954 CFH EXHAUST DEEHERGIXE ON fAX FC>> fAIL CLOSED PURGE CKJJAUST FAH 51 FO>> FAlL OPOI NC>> JCRHAl.LY CLOSED NO>> NORMALLY OPEN LO>> LOCKED OPEN FAX>> HJQI DRYVELL PRESSUREJ LOV REACTOR LC>> LOCKED CLOSED VCSSEL VATER LEVELJ REACTOR BUILDIHG Q>> ANNNCJATOR 14 VOITJLATION EKHAUST HIGH RADIATIOK lI'AOIQKGToN Pvouo PoYKA RE>> RAD ELEMENT RR>> RAD RECORDER 43 SUPPLY SYSTEM'IEtulGL EHO>>ELECTRO HYDRAILIC VATHlJJGTOH 993524968 OPERATOR TJTLC HAN>>HAJIUAL OPERATOR IJJFORHATION DRAVJNG DNLY SEPT 22. 1888 ORIGINAL VNP 2 I'ARTJAL CONTROL ROON VENTILATION SYS Figure 1 Pre-Event Control Room HVAC | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR ER) | |||
TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAHE (1) OOCKET NUHBER (2) LER NUHBER (8) AGE (3) ear umber ev. No. | |||
Washington Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 3 9 0 5 0 0 0 7 8 3 I I 7 F 7 ITLE (4) | |||
SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROOM HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZED OPERATION NODE DUE TO DESIGN IRIRttnL Ruof It t IAKC RADVASTC RKHOTE RQIOTE tto ItNAKC et | |||
~FC Pf 51C Qtto DIV I It t TAKE e2 WEST> (EAST) cLosc ott rnz QRE ttAH Hntt HO tIAH HAtl rc | |||
~ Etto 52C DIV II IV II l Dlv I DIV Il ste-t H DIV 11 ) DIV I FHKRG EIIERG FILTER FILTER RR T YPI CAI. | |||
TYPICAL rnu 5th 5th-I 31 D-I rnN sic DIV I DIV I ) V It DIV II FAN 5IA TAN 51D DIV I DIV II DKTERN'D cottTRUL Relet DE'TERN'D El lO slo ro Score FO523 51 FO DIV I DIV II DIV II DIV I LEKIQl ~TSO CFH EXHAUST FLOV Itl LOIC rntt 53n F'nN 53B DELIIERGIZE OH FAZ | |||
~ Ito FLOV IH LlttE DIV I DIV II" FC>> FAIL CLOSED FO>> I'AIL OPEN PURGE CXIIAUST rnw sl IIC>> ttORHALLY CLOSED NO>> IIORHALLY OPEN LO>> LOCKED OPEN f'AZ IIIQI DRYMELL PRESSUREI LOV REACTOR LC>> LOCKED CLOSED VCSSEL VAILR LEVELt REACTOR DUILoltlo A, ~ ntotuttctntoR to vEHTILATIotl ExttnusT IIIQI RADIATIUIL xtotoxotott rootle ronn RE RAD ELKHEHl'R>> | |||
RAD RECORDER Et to>>ELECTRO IITDRAULIC b3 svpvu'vsYFw RIEIILAIIILMASIIIIIGION 99352-0968 OPERATOR 1ICLC Hntt>>HAIIUAL OPERA'TOR IttreettnttOH DRnvlHG QILY SEPt 27. 19oo pRoposKD vtlp 2 pnRtlnL cotttRUL Roott vEttllLATIUtlsts Figure 2 Post-Event Control Room HVAC}} |
Latest revision as of 13:51, 29 October 2019
ML17289B167 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Columbia ![]() |
Issue date: | 02/12/1993 |
From: | John Baker, Fies C WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
GO2-93-032, GO2-93-32, LER-88-031, LER-88-31, NUDOCS 9302220096 | |
Download: ML17289B167 (9) | |
Text
DOCUIVIENT SYSTEM ACCELERATE REGULARLY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIO DISTRIBUTION YSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9302220096 DOC.DATE: 93/02/12 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2 Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION FIESPC.L. Washington Public Power Supply System BAKER,J.W. Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
SUBJECT:
LER 88-031-01:on 880902,determined that due to single failure CR HVAC sys could operate in recirculation mode. D Caused by lack of communication between AE design groups.CR HVAC recirculation mode of operation analyzed.W/930212 ltr.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED:LTR j ENCL TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc.
NOTES:
j SIZE: C RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL D PD5 LA 1 1 PD5 PD 1 1 CLIFFORDPJ 1 1 D INTERNAL: ACNW 2 2 ACRS 2 2 AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1 1 AEOD/ROAB/DSP 2 2 NRR/DET/EMEB 7E 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LHFB10 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OEAB 1 1 NRR/DREP/PRPBll 2 2 NRR/DST/SELB 8D 1 1 NRR/DST/SICB8H3 1 1 D SPLB8D1 1 1 NRR/DST/SRXB 8E 1 1 EG FIL 02 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 RGN5 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: EGGG BRYCE,J.H 2 2 L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC MURPHYPG.A 1 1 NSIC POOREPW 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 D
D D
NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
S PLEASE HELP VS TO REDUCE WASTEI CONTACT THE DOCVMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATEYOVR NAME FROM DISTRIBVTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOV DONT NEEDl FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 31 ENCL 31
vi WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968 ~ 3000 George Washington Way ~ Richland, Washington 99352 February 12, 1993 G02-93-032 Docket No. 50-397 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
SUBJECT:
NUCLEAR PLANT WNP-2, OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT NO. 88-031-01 Transmitted herewith is Licensee Event Report No. 88-031-01 for the WNP-2 Plant. This revised report is submitted in response to the requirements of 10CFR50.73. It provides an update of the corrective actions and an evaluation of the safety significance that was not available for the original report.
Sincerely, J. W. Baker WNP-2 Plant Manager (Mail Drop 927M)
JWB/CLF/my Enclosure 1901.24 CC: Mr. J. B. Martin, NRC - Region V Mr. R. Barr, NRC Resident Inspector (Mail Drop 901A, 2 Copies)
INPO Records Center - Atlanta, GA Mr. D. L. Williams, BPA (Mail Drop 399) 9302220096 930212 PDR ADOCK 05000397 S PDR
LICENSEE EV T REPORT (LER)
ACILITY NAME (I) DOCKET HUMB R ( ) PAGE (3)
Washin ton Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 0 5 0 0 0 3 9 7 I DF 7 TITLE (4)
SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROOM HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZEDOPERATION MODE DUE TO DESIGN EVENT DATE (5) LER NUMBER 6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)
MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL EV I SION MONTH DAY YEAR FACILITY NAMES 00 CKET HUMBERS(S)
NUMBER UMBER 5 0 0 9 0 2 8 8 8 8 0 3 1 0 I 0 2 I 2 9 3 050 PERATING HIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 5: (Check one or more of the following) (11)
ODE (9) 4 ONER LEVEL 20.402(b) 20.405(C) 50.73(a)(2)(iv) 77.71(b)
(10) 20.405(a)(1)(i) 50.36(c)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v) 73.73(c) 0 0 0 20.405(a)(1)(ii) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vii) THER (Specify in Abstract 20.405(a)(1)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) clew and in Text, NRC 20.405(a)(1)(iv) X 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) orm 366A) 0.405(a)(1)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(x)
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
NAME TELEPHOHE NUMBER REA CODE C. L. Fies, Licensing Engineer 5 0 9 7 7 - 4 1 4 7 COMPLETE OHE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IH THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MAHUFACTURER EPORTABLE CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE 0 HPRDS TO NPRDS 2;l, REPORT EXPECTED (14) .'UPPLEMENTAL EXPEC'TED SUBMISSION MONTH DAY YEAR ATE (15)
YES (If es c iete EXPECTED SUBMISSIOH DATE) NO TAACT OOI On September 2, 1988, a Design Engineer determined that due to a single failure the Control Room Heating and Ventilation (HVAC) System could operate in the recirculation mode during emergency conditions. This unanalyzed condition was found while performing an engineering evaluation of the safety significance of the event reported in LER 88-005-00.
During a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) the normal fresh air intake for the Control Room HVAC is isolated and two remote air intake lines are opened. Each remote air intake line has two isolation valves and one valve is powered from Division 1 and the other from Division 2. A single failure (not a loss of power failure) in a power division could cause a valve in each remote air intake line to isolate. With the loss of all fresh air input the Control Room HVAC would continue to operate but in the recirculation mode. In the recirculation mode the Control Room would not remain pressurized with respect to surrounding areas, and operating post LOCA in this mode was not an analyzed condition.
Immediate corrective actions were: The motor operators for the four (two per line) remote air intake isolation valves were replaced with manual operators. Two of the four. radiation purge line isolation valves motor operators were electrically disconnected. Both isolation valves in the remote intake lines were locked open to assure that a single failure could not result in recirculation mode operation. The Control Room Emergency Filtration System was started and the Control Room HVAC System is operating in the pressurization mode.
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR ER)
TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (8) AGE (3) ear umber ev. No.
Washington Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 8 3 1 1 2 OF 7 TiTLE (4)
SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROON HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZED OPERATION NODE DUE TO DESIGN Ab tract nt'd The cause of this event was the Plant Architect/Engineer (AE) did not provide a Control Room HVAC System design which protected the system against all possible single failures. The root cause of this event is a lack of communication between AE design groups.
Further corrective actions were taken: The Control Room HVAC recirculation mode of operation was analyzed. Technical Specification Amendment No. 74 was received allowing Control Room HVAC operation with the revised configuration. A letter was sent to Burns & Roe Inc. providing notification of a potential 10CFR Part 21 condition.
PI n Con i ion Power Level - 0%
Plant Mode - 4 (Cold Shutdown)
Event De ri ti n On September 2, 1988, a Design Engineer determined that, due to single failures, the Control Room Heating and Ventilation (HVAC) System could operate during emergency conditions in the recirculation mode, which is an unanalyzed condition. This unanalyzed condition was discovered while performing an engineering evaluation committed to in LER 88-005-00 to evaluate the potential effects of minor Control Room HVAC system changes on system bypass flow.
The following brief description of the Control Room HVAC System (before modification) for normal operation and emergency operation during a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) is presented to aid in understanding the event and the changes made to the system. Figure 1 is a partial diagram of the Control Room HVAC System prior to the event. The Control Room HVAC System consists of two redundant systems for both normal and emergency operation. During normal operation, 1000 cfm of fresh air from the normal roof intake Radwaste Building is mixed with 20,000 cfm of recirculated air (through fan 51A or 51B). Seven hundred and fifty (750) cfm is exhausted from the control room through fan 51 and the remaining 250 cfm pressurizes the control room and is exfiltrated. Also during normal operation, the remote air intake isolation valves (51A and B and 52A and B) are closed and the radiation monitor purge line valves (51D and E and 52D and E) are open with radiation monitor purge line fans 53A and B operating. During a LOCA when any of the following trip levels are reached 1) High drywell pressure
("F" signal), 2) Low low reactor water level ("A" signal) or 3) Reactor building ventilation exhaust high radiation ("Z" signal) the following actions occur:
a) The normal roof intake Radwaste Building is isolated by closing valves 51C and 52C.
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAME (1) OOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (B) AGE (3) ear umber ev. No.
Washington Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 0 5 0 0 0 3 9 7 I
8 031 01 3 F 7 1TLE (4)
SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROOM HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZED OPERATION MODE, DUE TO DESIGN b) The 750 cfm control room exhaust fan (51) deenergizes.
c) The remote air intake isolation valves (51A, 51B, 52A, and 52B) open and the radiation monitor purge line isolation valves (51D, 51E, 52D and 52E) close. The remote air intake isolation valves and the radiation monitor purge line isolation valves are interlocked so when an intake line is opened the associated purge line is isolated.
d) The control room emergency filtration system is automatically started and draws 1000 cfm of fresh air through the remote air intakes. This additional air, when added to the recirculated air, pressurizes the control room.
The event described in LER 88-005 was for leakage around the emergency filters in excess of the technical specification allowable limit. During the engineering evaluation committed to in LER 88-005 to determine the effect of the excess leakage on control room habitability, a design engineer determined that postulated single failures could cause some combination of remote air intake line isolation valves to fail to open or to reisolate and; thus, isolate both remote air intake lines. If this condition existed during LOCA conditions, the Control Room HVAC would be running in a recirculation mode only since the normal roof intake is also isolated. In the recirculation mode the 20,000 cfm would continue to be drawn from the control room and recirculated back to the control room; however, without the fresh air input the control room would not be pressurized. In a neutral pressure condition the inleakage to the control room would increase and this condition is not analyzed.
Imm iateAci n The planned Plant Startup was delayed until the following actions were completed. 1) The motor operators were removed and manual operators were installed on the remote air intake isolation valves (51A and B and 52A and B). The valve operators were changed to manual so the isolation valves on the remote intake lines could be opened without an FAZ signal present; thereby, assuring that a single failure could not cause operation in the recirculation mode. With the remote air intake lines open, the control room emergency filtration system is started, fan 51 is deenergized, and the associated damper is closed. This put the Control Room HVAC system in the pressurization mode of operation which satisfied the action statement of Technical Specification 3.3.7.1. The current Plant configuration has both remote intakes open during normal operation. Figure 2 shows the post event Control Room HVAC configuration. 2) Two of the radiation purge line isolation valve electro-pneumatic operator motors (52D and 51E) were electrically disconnected which causes the valves to open. This was done so that only one manual action is required to isolate a remote path and cause the associated purge path to open or vice versa. 3) The 750 cfm control room exhaust fan (51) was deenergized. 4) Specific directions for Plant Operators to execute to maintain design bases in the event of a LOCA were provided in (approved) deviated Plant procedures. Each new operations crew was provided training by Operation Managers.
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAHE (I) 00CKET NUHBER (2) LER NUHBER (8) AGE (3)
Year umber ev. No.
Washington Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 0 3 9 7 0 5 0 0 8 031 01 4 F 7 TITLE (4)
SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROOM HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZED OPERATION MODE DUE TO DESIGN Further Evaluati n and orrective Action A. Further Evaluation This event was reported per 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(i) on September 2, 1988 at 1702 hours0.0197 days <br />0.473 hours <br />0.00281 weeks <br />6.47611e-4 months <br />. The event is also reported per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A).
There were no structures, systems, or components inoperable prior to this event which contributed to the event.
The cause of this event was the failure of the Plant Architect/Engineer (Burns & Roe Inc.) to provide a system design for which a single failure could not isolate both remote air intakes and cause the Control Room HVAC System to operate in the recirculation mode, or to analyze the recirculation mode of operation. The root cause of this event is a lack of communication between the Architect/Engineer design groups.
B. Further Corrective Action
- 1) The Control Room HVAC recirculation mode of operation was analyzed. The results are summarized under safety significance below.
- 2) Technical Specification Amendment 74 was received allowing operation of the Control Room HVAC system in the revised configuration.
- 3) A letter was sent to Burns & Roe Inc., providing notification of a potential 10CFR Part 21 condition.
~Sf ii lit~i The safety significance of operation in the recirculation mode has been evaluated. The results are documented in Technical Memorandum TM-1158, Revision 4. The calculation assumed Control Room inleakage in the range of 350 to 450 cubic feet per minute. The calculated whole body gamma dose and skin beta dose were within limits. However, the calculated thyroid dose was approximately 100 Rem which exceeds the Standard Review Plan 6.4 limit of 30 Rem. It is therefore concluded that this event has safety significance as a single failure during LOCA conditions could have resulted in Licensing Basis Document (LBD) limits being exceeded.
imil r Ev n None
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR ER)
TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAME (1) OOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (8) AGE (3) ear '(umber ev. No.
Washington Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 0 0 0 3 9 0 5 7 8 031 01 5 OF 7 ITLE (4)
SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROOM HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZED OPERATION MODE DUE TO DESIGN E~f Tex R f ren f*
m~mm~nen
/~Lcm Control Room Heating and Ventilation VH (HVAC) System Normal Fresh Air Intake (Normal Roof Intake VH Radwaste Building)
Remote Air Intake Line, (East or West) VH Remote Air Intake Isolation Valves (51A and VH ISV B and 52A and B)
Remote Air Intake Isolation Valve Motor 84 Operator (Electro-Pneumatic Motor Operator)
Radiation Purge Line Isolation Valves (51D ISV and E and 52D and E)
Radiation Purge Line Isolation Valve Motor VH 84 Operator (Electro-Pneumatic Motor Operators)
Control Room Emergency Filtration System FAN Fan 51A or 51B 750 cfm Control Room Exhaust Fan (51) VH FAN Radiation Purge Live Exhaust Fans (53A VH FAN and B)
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR ER)
TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY HAHE (I) OOCKET HUHBER (2) LER HUHBER (8) AGE (3) ear umber ev. Ho.
Washington Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 0 3 9 0 5 0 0 7 8 031 1 6 F 7 ITLE (4)
SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROON HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZED OPERATION NODE DUE TO DESIGN VALVES CLOSC NORHAI ROOF ON HIGH-HJQI INTAKC RADIATION ALARM RADVASTE I VALVES I <TYPICAL> BLDG ', I vhLvcs I RCHOTE OPEN OW I OPQ< OJJ I RLHOTE INTAKC FAX 0 FAX OITAKC I I 01 EHO 5IC DIV I lz I I <EASTI CLOSC OM fAX I L Rc gna>>>> RC J r-" M 0
SIKE 52C DIV ll IV RC 11
~ 5 IA 5ZA Dlv I 5<A-I DIV ll 50B-I 52B 5IB +
DIV I DIV Il I FGDIV II DJV II I I Dlv I I
EHER6 CHER G I FILTER FILTER RR TYPICAL AH I I II TYPICAL I I 5IA-I IB "I II I I FAN 50A I DIV I V II FAM 50B II I I DIV DIV II II I I II II
.r" L I I
'~JI FAN 51A FAN 5IB I Dlv I Dlv 11 I I I I I I CONTROL ROON 0
EHO 5ID FO DIV I EHO 52DFO Dlv 11 154 CTH
~ FO Dlv EHO Il FO EHO DIV'I FAH 53A'AH II DIV I DIV 53B 954 CFH EXHAUST DEEHERGIXE ON fAX FC>> fAIL CLOSED PURGE CKJJAUST FAH 51 FO>> FAlL OPOI NC>> JCRHAl.LY CLOSED NO>> NORMALLY OPEN LO>> LOCKED OPEN FAX>> HJQI DRYVELL PRESSUREJ LOV REACTOR LC>> LOCKED CLOSED VCSSEL VATER LEVELJ REACTOR BUILDIHG Q>> ANNNCJATOR 14 VOITJLATION EKHAUST HIGH RADIATIOK lI'AOIQKGToN Pvouo PoYKA RE>> RAD ELEMENT RR>> RAD RECORDER 43 SUPPLY SYSTEM'IEtulGL EHO>>ELECTRO HYDRAILIC VATHlJJGTOH 993524968 OPERATOR TJTLC HAN>>HAJIUAL OPERATOR IJJFORHATION DRAVJNG DNLY SEPT 22. 1888 ORIGINAL VNP 2 I'ARTJAL CONTROL ROON VENTILATION SYS Figure 1 Pre-Event Control Room HVAC
LICENSEE EVENT REPOR ER)
TEXT CONTINUATION AGILITY NAHE (1) OOCKET NUHBER (2) LER NUHBER (8) AGE (3) ear umber ev. No.
Washington Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 3 9 0 5 0 0 0 7 8 3 I I 7 F 7 ITLE (4)
SINGLE FAILURE COULD CAUSE CONTROL ROOM HVAC TO OPERATE IN AN UNANALYZED OPERATION NODE DUE TO DESIGN IRIRttnL Ruof It t IAKC RADVASTC RKHOTE RQIOTE tto ItNAKC et
~FC Pf 51C Qtto DIV I It t TAKE e2 WEST> (EAST) cLosc ott rnz QRE ttAH Hntt HO tIAH HAtl rc
~ Etto 52C DIV II IV II l Dlv I DIV Il ste-t H DIV 11 ) DIV I FHKRG EIIERG FILTER FILTER RR T YPI CAI.
TYPICAL rnu 5th 5th-I 31 D-I rnN sic DIV I DIV I ) V It DIV II FAN 5IA TAN 51D DIV I DIV II DKTERN'D cottTRUL Relet DE'TERN'D El lO slo ro Score FO523 51 FO DIV I DIV II DIV II DIV I LEKIQl ~TSO CFH EXHAUST FLOV Itl LOIC rntt 53n F'nN 53B DELIIERGIZE OH FAZ
~ Ito FLOV IH LlttE DIV I DIV II" FC>> FAIL CLOSED FO>> I'AIL OPEN PURGE CXIIAUST rnw sl IIC>> ttORHALLY CLOSED NO>> IIORHALLY OPEN LO>> LOCKED OPEN f'AZ IIIQI DRYMELL PRESSUREI LOV REACTOR LC>> LOCKED CLOSED VCSSEL VAILR LEVELt REACTOR DUILoltlo A, ~ ntotuttctntoR to vEHTILATIotl ExttnusT IIIQI RADIATIUIL xtotoxotott rootle ronn RE RAD ELKHEHl'R>>
RAD RECORDER Et to>>ELECTRO IITDRAULIC b3 svpvu'vsYFw RIEIILAIIILMASIIIIIGION 99352-0968 OPERATOR 1ICLC Hntt>>HAIIUAL OPERA'TOR IttreettnttOH DRnvlHG QILY SEPt 27. 19oo pRoposKD vtlp 2 pnRtlnL cotttRUL Roott vEttllLATIUtlsts Figure 2 Post-Event Control Room HVAC