ML17300B147: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:DOCKET 0 05000528 05000529 05000530  
{{#Wiki_filter:'ii          REGUL    RY INFORMATION  DISTRIBUTI    ~
SYSTEM (RIDB)
ACCESSION NOR: 8712280138          DOC. DATE: 87/12/22    NO AR IZED: NO          DOCKET 0 STN-50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Stations Unit ii Arizona Pub STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Btationi Unit 2i Arizona Pub
                                                                          'ACIL:
li li 05000528 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Stations Unit 3i Arizona Publi 05000530 AUTH. NAME            AUTHOR AFFILIATION VAN BRUNTi E. E.      Arizona Nuclear Poeer Pro Ject (formerly Arizona Public Serv RECIP. NAME            RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Application for amends to Licenses NPF-41.NPF-51 5 NPF-74 revising Tech Spec Section 6.9.1.4 to require repts to be submitted'ithin first calendar quarter of each gr.Fee paid.DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR)ENCL SIZE: TITLE: OR Submittal:
Application for amends to Licenses NPF-41. NPF-51 5 NPF-74 revising Tech Spec Section 6. 9. 1. 4 to require repts to be submitted'ithin first calendar quarter of each gr. Fee paid.
General Distribution
DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D         COPIES RECEIVED: LTR   ) ENCL     SIZE:
'ii REGUL RY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI
TITLE:     OR Submittal: General Distribution NOTES:   Standardized   plant.                                                   05000528 Standardized   plant.                                                   05000529 Standardized   plant.                                                   05000530 RECIPIENT         COP I EB        RECIPIENT          COPIES ID CODE/NAME      LTTR ENCL      ID CODE/NAME       LTTR ENCL PD5 LA                 1      0  PD5 PD                5        5 LICITRA> E             1      1  DAVIS'                1        1 INTERNAL: ACRB                       6      6  ARM/DAF/LFMB          1        0 NRR/DEST/ADB           1      1  NRR/DEBT/CEB          1        1 NRR/DEBT/MTB          1       1   NRR/DEBT/RSB          1        1 NRR/DOEA/TSH          1      1  NRR/PMAS/ILRB         1       1 OGC/HDB1              1       0                   01              1 REB/DE/EIB                    1 EXTERNAL: LPDR                      1       1   NRC PDR                1       1 NBIC                  1       1 NOTES:
~SYSTEM (RIDB)ACCESSION NOR: 8712280138 DOC.DATE: 87/12/22 NO AR IZED: NO'ACIL: STN-50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Stations Unit ii Arizona Pub li STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Btationi Unit 2i Arizona Pub li STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Stations Unit 3i Arizona Publi AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION VAN BRUNTi E.E.Arizona Nuclear Poeer Pro Ject (formerly Arizona Public Serv RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)NOTES: Standardized plant.Standardized plant.Standardized plant.05000528 05000529 05000530 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 LA LICITRA>E INTERNAL: ACRB NRR/DEST/ADB NRR/DEBT/MTB NRR/DOEA/TSH OGC/HDB1 REB/DE/EIB EXTERNAL: LPDR NBIC COP I EB LTTR ENCL 1 0 1 1 6 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 PD DAVIS'ARM/DAF/LFMB NRR/DEBT/CEB NRR/DEBT/RSB NRR/PMAS/ILRB 01 NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 5 5 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTES: TOTAL NUMBER OF COP IEB REQUIRED: LTTR 28 ENCL 25  
TOTAL NUMBER OF COP IEB REQUIRED: LTTR         28   ENCL     25
~g/I 0 Arizona Nucfear Power Project P.O.BOX 52034~PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85072-2034 Docket Nos.STN 50-528/529/530 161-00712-EEVB/PGN December 22, 1987 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 ATTN: Document Control Desk


==Dear Sirs:==
  ~ g
/I
 
0 Arizona Nucfear Power Project P.O. BOX 52034 ~  PHOENIX, ARIZONA85072-2034 161-00712-EEVB/PGN December 22, 1987 Docket Nos. STN  50-528/529/530 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 ATTN: Document    Control Desk
 
==Dear Sirs:==


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)Units 1, 2 and 3 Technical Specification Amendment-Section 6.9.1.4 File: 87-F-005-419.05; 87-A-056-026 Attached please find proposed changes to the PVNGS Units 1, 2 and 3 Technical Specifications.
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station             (PVNGS)
The proposed change is to the due date requirement for the annual reports required by T.S.6.9.1.4.Enclosed with the amendment request package, are the following:
Units 1, 2 and 3 Technical Specification Amendment-Section 6.9.1.4 File: 87-F-005-419.05;       87-A-056-026 Attached please find proposed changes               to the     PVNGS   Units 1, 2 and 3 Technical Specifications. The proposed change is to the                 due date requirement     for the annual reports required by T.S. 6.9.1.4.
A.B.C.D.E.F.G.Description of the Technical Specification Amendment Request.Purpose of the Technical Specification.
Enclosed with the amendment request package,               are the following:
Need for the Technical Specification Amendment.
A. Description of the Technical Specification Amendment Request.
Basis for Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination.
B. Purpose of the Technical Specification.
Safety Evaluation for the Amendment Request.Environmental Impact Consideration Determination.
C. Need for the Technical Specification Amendment.
Marked-up Technical Specification Change Pages.Once issued, the Technical Specification amendment will be implemented within thirty days of the effective date.By copy of this letter, we are also forwarding the proposed changes to the appropriate state agency.In accordance with the requirements of 10CFR170.12(c),, the license amendment application fee of$150.00 is being forwarded to the USNRC License Fee Management Coordinator.
D. Basis for Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination.
.-----im 87~~sae 8712~8aiocH, 0500059R pgR AD.P P 00'  
E. Safety Evaluation for the Amendment Request.
~a'~~1 I,'I 8 tl'k<-.I i USNRC Document Control Desk Page 2 161-00712-EEVB/PGN December 22, 1987 If you have any questions, please call A.C.Rogers at (602)371-4087.Very trul yours, E.E.Van Brunt, Jr.Executive Vice President Project Director EEVB/PGN/ls Attachments CC: (all w/a)0.M.De Michele A.C.Gehr G.W.Knighton E.A.Licitra J.B.Martin J.R.Ball C.E.Tedford R.M.Diggs (w/WFD$150.00)  
F. Environmental Impact Consideration Determination.
G. Marked-up Technical Specification Change Pages.
Once issued,   the Technical Specification             amendment       will be implemented   within thirty   days of the effective date.
By copy   of this letter,     we     are also       forwarding the proposed       changes   to the appropriate state agency.
In accordance with the requirements of 10CFR170.12(c),, the license                         amendment application fee of $ 150.00 is being forwarded to the USNRC License Fee                     Management Coordinator.
                          .--   -- -im 87~~sae 8712~8aiocH, 0500059R pgR     AD             . P P
00'
 
                ~a'
                    ~~
1 tl I, 'I 8
  'k
          <-.I i
 
USNRC   Document Control Desk                     161-00712-EEVB/PGN Page 2                                            December 22, 1987 If you have   any questions,   please call A. C. Rogers at (602) 371-4087.
Very trul yours, E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
Executive Vice President Project Director EEVB/PGN/ls Attachments CC:   0. M. De  Michele      (all w/a)
A. C. Gehr G. W. Knighton E. A. Licitra J. B. Martin J. R. Ball C. E. Tedford R. M. Diggs     (w/WFD $ 150.00)
 
~~
~~
ATTACHMENT A.DESCRIPTION OF THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT RE VEST Technical Specification (T.S.)6.9.1.4 currently requires that the annual~, r'eports described in T.S.6.9.1.5be submitted prior to March 1 of each year.The proposed change would modify this to require the reports to be submitted within the first calendar quarter of each year.BE PURPOSE OF THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION C.The purpose of this Technical Specification is to delineate the due date ,,the annual reports described in T.S.6.9.1.5.NEED FOR THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT for This Technical Specification amendment is necessary to make the T.S.requirements consistent with the requirements of 10CFR20.407 and eliminate the potential for reports to be sent in late due to an inconsistency in the reporting requirements.
ATTACHMENT A. DESCRIPTION OF THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT RE VEST Technical Specification (T.S.) 6.9.1.4 currently requires that the annual
D.BASIS FOR PROPOSED NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION 1.The Commission has provided standards for determining whether a significant hazards consideration exists as stated in 10CFR50.92.
  ~, r'eports described in T.S. 6.9.1.5 be submitted prior to March 1 of each year.
A proposed amendment to an operating license for a facility involves no significant hazards consideration if operation of the facility in accordance with a proposed amendment would not: (1)involve a significant increase in the probability or'onsequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2)create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3)involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.A discussion of these standards as they relate to the'amendment request follows: Standard 1--Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
The proposed change would modify this to require the reports to be submitted within the first calendar quarter of each year.
The proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated since the change is administrative in nature, making the reporting requirements in the Technical Specifications consistent with the reporting requirements in 10CFR20.407.
BE   PURPOSE OF THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION The purpose of this Technical Specification           is to delineate the   due date         for
This does not affect any accident analyses, therefore, the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated will'ot be increased.  
    ,,the annual reports described in T.S. 6.9.1.5.
C. NEED FOR THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT This Technical Specification amendment is necessary to make the                       T.S.
requirements consistent with the requirements of 10CFR20.407 and eliminate the potential for reports to be sent in late due to an inconsistency in the reporting requirements.
D. BASIS FOR PROPOSED NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION
: 1. The   Commission     has   provided     standards   for determining whether a significant hazards       consideration exists as stated in 10CFR50.92.                   A proposed amendment to an operating license for a facility involves no significant hazards consideration           if   operation of the facility in not: (1) involve a significant accordance  with  a  proposed  amendment    would increase in   the   probability   or 'onsequences     of an accident previously evaluated; or (2)     create   the possibility   of a   new or different kind of accident from any       accident   previously     evaluated;   or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
A discussion of these standards as         they relate to the   'amendment   request follows:
Standard   1--Involve a significant increase in the probability                         or consequences   of an accident previously evaluated.
The proposed   change does     not   involve a significant increase in the probability   or consequences     of an accident previously evaluated since the change is administrative in nature, making the reporting requirements                     in the Technical Specifications consistent with the reporting             requirements in 10CFR20.407. This does not affect any accident analyses, therefore, the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated             will'ot be increased.
 
~~
~~
Standard 2--Create the possibility or a new or different.
Standard 2--Create the possibility or a new or     different. kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
The proposed change   will not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated since the change is administrative in nature, making the reporting requirements in the Technical Specifications consistent with the reporting requirements in 10CFR20.407. This does not affect any accident analyses, therefore, the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated will not be created.
The proposed change will not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated since the change is administrative in nature, making the reporting requirements in the Technical Specifications consistent with the reporting requirements in 10CFR20.407.
Standard 3--Involve a   significant reduction in   a margin of safety.
This does not affect any accident analyses, therefore, the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated will not be created.Standard 3--Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.'2 1 The proposed change will not involve a reduction in a margin of safety since the change is administrative in nature, making the reporting requirements in the Technical Specifications consistent with the reporting requirements in 10CFR20.407.
The proposed change   will not involve a reduction in a margin of safety since the change is administrative in nature, making the reporting requirements in the Technical         Specifications consistent with the reporting requirements in 10CFR20.407. This in no way affects any LCOs or surveillance requirements -in the Technical Specifications, thereby maintaining the margin of safety they provide.
This in no way affects any LCOs or surveillance requirements-in the Technical Specifications, thereby maintaining the margin of safety they provide.The proposed change matches the guidance concerning the application of'he standards for determining'hether or not a significant hazards consideration exists (51FR7751) by the example: (i)A purely administrative change to Technical Specifications:
  '2    The proposed change     matches the guidance   concerning the application of 1
for example, a change to achieve consistency throughout the Technical Specifications, correction of an error, or a change in nomenclature.
        'he   standards   for determining'hether or not         a significant hazards consideration exists (51FR7751) by the example:
E.SAFETY EVALUATION FOR THE AMENDMENT RE VEST The proposed change will not increase the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR, nor will it increase the probability or consequences of a malfunction of equipment important to safety.The change is administrative in nature and does not affect any equipment important to safety or any FSAR accident analyses.Therefore, the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR or malfunction of equipment important to safety are not increased.
(i) A purely administrative change to Technical Specifications: for example, a change   to achieve consistency throughout the Technical Specifications, correction of an error, or a change in nomenclature.
The possibility of an accident or malfunction of a different type than previously evaluated in the FSAR will not be created.This change modifies the due date for certain reports required by the T.S.'nd has no impact on any accident analyses contained in the FSAR.Therefore, the possibility of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety or a different type will not be created.
E. SAFETY EVALUATION FOR THE AMENDMENT RE VEST The proposed change   will   not increase the probability or consequences of an accident previously     evaluated   in the FSAR, nor will       it increase   the probability or consequences of a   malfunction of equipment important   to safety.
1~
The change   is administrative in nature and does not affect any equipment important to safety or any FSAR accident analyses. Therefore, the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR or malfunction of equipment important to safety are not increased.
The proposed change will not involve a reduction in a margin of safety since the change is administrative in nature, making the reporting requirements in the Technical Specifications consistent with the reporting requirements in 10CFR20.407.
The possibility of an accident or malfunction of a different type than previously evaluated in the FSAR will not be created. This change modifies the due date for certain reports required by the T.S.'nd has no impact on any accident analyses contained in the FSAR. Therefore, the possibility of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety or a different type will not be created.
This in no way affects any LCOs or surveillance requirements in the Technical Specifications, thereby maintaining the margin of safety they provide.F.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION The proposed change request does not involve an unreviewed environmental question because operation of PVNGS Units 1, 2 and 3, in accordance with this change, would not: 2.Result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the Final Environmental Statement (FES)as modified by the staff's testimony to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, Supplements to the FES, Environmental Impact appraisals, or in any decisions of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board;or Result in a significant change in effluents or power levels;or 3.Result in matters not previously reviewed in the licensing basis for PVNGS which may have a significant environmental impact.MARKED-UP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE PAGES Administrative Controls: 6-17  
 
~y~\W 4 t IC 1 1}}
1 ~
The proposed change will not involve a reduction in a margin of safety since the change is administrative in nature, making the reporting requirements in the Technical Specifications consistent with the reporting requirements in 10CFR20.407. This in no way affects any LCOs or surveillance requirements in the Technical Specifications, thereby maintaining the margin of safety they provide.
F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION The proposed   change request does not involve an unreviewed environmental question because operation of PVNGS Units 1, 2 and 3, in accordance with this change, would not:
Result in a significant increase in any adverse       environmental impact previously evaluated in the Final Environmental       Statement (FES) as modified by the staff's testimony to the Atomic       Safety and Licensing Board, Supplements to the FES, Environmental Impact appraisals, or in any decisions of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; or
: 2. Result in a significant change in effluents or power levels; or
: 3. Result in matters not previously reviewed in the licensing basis       for PVNGS which may have a significant environmental impact.
MARKED-UP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE PAGES Administrative Controls: 6-17
 
        ~
y W 4
            ~ \
t IC 1
1}}

Revision as of 11:25, 29 October 2019

Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-41,NPF-51 & NPF-74 Revising Tech Spec Section 6.9.1.4 to Require Repts to Be Submitted within First Calendar Quarter of Each Yr.Fee Paid
ML17300B147
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 12/22/1987
From: Van Brunt E
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
Shared Package
ML17300B148 List:
References
161-00712-EEVB, 161-712-EEVB, TAC-66917, TAC-66918, TAC-66919, NUDOCS 8712280138
Download: ML17300B147 (12)


Text

'ii REGUL RY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI ~

SYSTEM (RIDB)

ACCESSION NOR: 8712280138 DOC. DATE: 87/12/22 NO AR IZED: NO DOCKET 0 STN-50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Stations Unit ii Arizona Pub STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Btationi Unit 2i Arizona Pub

'ACIL:

li li 05000528 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Stations Unit 3i Arizona Publi 05000530 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION VAN BRUNTi E. E. Arizona Nuclear Poeer Pro Ject (formerly Arizona Public Serv RECIP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Application for amends to Licenses NPF-41. NPF-51 5 NPF-74 revising Tech Spec Section 6. 9. 1. 4 to require repts to be submitted'ithin first calendar quarter of each gr. Fee paid.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ) ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: OR Submittal: General Distribution NOTES: Standardized plant. 05000528 Standardized plant. 05000529 Standardized plant. 05000530 RECIPIENT COP I EB RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD5 LA 1 0 PD5 PD 5 5 LICITRA> E 1 1 DAVIS' 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRB 6 6 ARM/DAF/LFMB 1 0 NRR/DEST/ADB 1 1 NRR/DEBT/CEB 1 1 NRR/DEBT/MTB 1 1 NRR/DEBT/RSB 1 1 NRR/DOEA/TSH 1 1 NRR/PMAS/ILRB 1 1 OGC/HDB1 1 0 01 1 REB/DE/EIB 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NBIC 1 1 NOTES:

TOTAL NUMBER OF COP IEB REQUIRED: LTTR 28 ENCL 25

~ g

/I

0 Arizona Nucfear Power Project P.O. BOX 52034 ~ PHOENIX, ARIZONA85072-2034 161-00712-EEVB/PGN December 22, 1987 Docket Nos. STN 50-528/529/530 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 ATTN: Document Control Desk

Dear Sirs:

Subject:

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)

Units 1, 2 and 3 Technical Specification Amendment-Section 6.9.1.4 File: 87-F-005-419.05; 87-A-056-026 Attached please find proposed changes to the PVNGS Units 1, 2 and 3 Technical Specifications. The proposed change is to the due date requirement for the annual reports required by T.S. 6.9.1.4.

Enclosed with the amendment request package, are the following:

A. Description of the Technical Specification Amendment Request.

B. Purpose of the Technical Specification.

C. Need for the Technical Specification Amendment.

D. Basis for Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination.

E. Safety Evaluation for the Amendment Request.

F. Environmental Impact Consideration Determination.

G. Marked-up Technical Specification Change Pages.

Once issued, the Technical Specification amendment will be implemented within thirty days of the effective date.

By copy of this letter, we are also forwarding the proposed changes to the appropriate state agency.

In accordance with the requirements of 10CFR170.12(c),, the license amendment application fee of $ 150.00 is being forwarded to the USNRC License Fee Management Coordinator.

.-- -- -im 87~~sae 8712~8aiocH, 0500059R pgR AD . P P

00'

~a'

~~

1 tl I, 'I 8

'k

<-.I i

USNRC Document Control Desk 161-00712-EEVB/PGN Page 2 December 22, 1987 If you have any questions, please call A. C. Rogers at (602) 371-4087.

Very trul yours, E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.

Executive Vice President Project Director EEVB/PGN/ls Attachments CC: 0. M. De Michele (all w/a)

A. C. Gehr G. W. Knighton E. A. Licitra J. B. Martin J. R. Ball C. E. Tedford R. M. Diggs (w/WFD $ 150.00)

~~

ATTACHMENT A. DESCRIPTION OF THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT RE VEST Technical Specification (T.S.) 6.9.1.4 currently requires that the annual

~, r'eports described in T.S. 6.9.1.5 be submitted prior to March 1 of each year.

The proposed change would modify this to require the reports to be submitted within the first calendar quarter of each year.

BE PURPOSE OF THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION The purpose of this Technical Specification is to delineate the due date for

,,the annual reports described in T.S. 6.9.1.5.

C. NEED FOR THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT This Technical Specification amendment is necessary to make the T.S.

requirements consistent with the requirements of 10CFR20.407 and eliminate the potential for reports to be sent in late due to an inconsistency in the reporting requirements.

D. BASIS FOR PROPOSED NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION

1. The Commission has provided standards for determining whether a significant hazards consideration exists as stated in 10CFR50.92. A proposed amendment to an operating license for a facility involves no significant hazards consideration if operation of the facility in not: (1) involve a significant accordance with a proposed amendment would increase in the probability or 'onsequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

A discussion of these standards as they relate to the 'amendment request follows:

Standard 1--Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.

The proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated since the change is administrative in nature, making the reporting requirements in the Technical Specifications consistent with the reporting requirements in 10CFR20.407. This does not affect any accident analyses, therefore, the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated will'ot be increased.

~~

Standard 2--Create the possibility or a new or different. kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.

The proposed change will not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated since the change is administrative in nature, making the reporting requirements in the Technical Specifications consistent with the reporting requirements in 10CFR20.407. This does not affect any accident analyses, therefore, the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated will not be created.

Standard 3--Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

The proposed change will not involve a reduction in a margin of safety since the change is administrative in nature, making the reporting requirements in the Technical Specifications consistent with the reporting requirements in 10CFR20.407. This in no way affects any LCOs or surveillance requirements -in the Technical Specifications, thereby maintaining the margin of safety they provide.

'2 The proposed change matches the guidance concerning the application of 1

'he standards for determining'hether or not a significant hazards consideration exists (51FR7751) by the example:

(i) A purely administrative change to Technical Specifications: for example, a change to achieve consistency throughout the Technical Specifications, correction of an error, or a change in nomenclature.

E. SAFETY EVALUATION FOR THE AMENDMENT RE VEST The proposed change will not increase the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR, nor will it increase the probability or consequences of a malfunction of equipment important to safety.

The change is administrative in nature and does not affect any equipment important to safety or any FSAR accident analyses. Therefore, the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR or malfunction of equipment important to safety are not increased.

The possibility of an accident or malfunction of a different type than previously evaluated in the FSAR will not be created. This change modifies the due date for certain reports required by the T.S.'nd has no impact on any accident analyses contained in the FSAR. Therefore, the possibility of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety or a different type will not be created.

1 ~

The proposed change will not involve a reduction in a margin of safety since the change is administrative in nature, making the reporting requirements in the Technical Specifications consistent with the reporting requirements in 10CFR20.407. This in no way affects any LCOs or surveillance requirements in the Technical Specifications, thereby maintaining the margin of safety they provide.

F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION The proposed change request does not involve an unreviewed environmental question because operation of PVNGS Units 1, 2 and 3, in accordance with this change, would not:

Result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the Final Environmental Statement (FES) as modified by the staff's testimony to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, Supplements to the FES, Environmental Impact appraisals, or in any decisions of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; or

2. Result in a significant change in effluents or power levels; or
3. Result in matters not previously reviewed in the licensing basis for PVNGS which may have a significant environmental impact.

MARKED-UP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE PAGES Administrative Controls: 6-17

~

y W 4

~ \

t IC 1

1