ML061010182: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/21/2005
| issue date = 10/21/2005
| title = E-mail from T. Jones of Entergy to Various, Regarding Radionuclides Testing
| title = E-mail from T. Jones of Entergy to Various, Regarding Radionuclides Testing
| author name = Jones T R
| author name = Jones T
| author affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
| author affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
| addressee name = Eddy P
| addressee name = Eddy P
Line 28: Line 28:
==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FW: Radionuclides Testing-----Original Message----
FW: Radionuclides Testing-----Original Message----
From: paul eddy@dps.state.ny.us  
From: paul eddy@dps.state.ny.us
[mailto:pauLeddy@dps.state.ny.us]
[mailto:pauLeddy@dps.state.ny.us]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:58 AM To: Jones, T. R.Cc: Janicki, John; asaOi @health.state.ny.us; Jrw~nrc.gov
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:58 AM To: Jones, T. R.Cc: Janicki, John; asaOi @health.state.ny.us; Jrw~nrc.gov
Line 36: Line 36:
Other than tritium, have there been any other radionuclides identified in any of the test wells at IPEC?How does the composition of the test well water compare to the Unit 2 spent fuel pool leak, and the UJnit 1 spent fuel pool leak?Paul Eddy 51 8-4E 6-2895 Ltager' 3-----Original Message-----
Other than tritium, have there been any other radionuclides identified in any of the test wells at IPEC?How does the composition of the test well water compare to the Unit 2 spent fuel pool leak, and the UJnit 1 spent fuel pool leak?Paul Eddy 51 8-4E 6-2895 Ltager' 3-----Original Message-----
From: pauLeddy@
From: pauLeddy@
dps.state.ny.us  
dps.state.ny.us
[mailto:paul-eddy@
[mailto:paul-eddy@
dps.state.ny.us]
dps.state.ny.us]

Revision as of 20:16, 13 July 2019

E-mail from T. Jones of Entergy to Various, Regarding Radionuclides Testing
ML061010182
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/21/2005
From: Jones T
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To: Eddy P
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, State of NY, Dept of Public Service
References
FOIA/PA-2006-0019
Download: ML061010182 (2)


Text

From: "Jones, T. R." <tjones2 © entergy.com>

To: "'pauleddyc dps.state.ny.us"'

<pauLeddy@

dps.state.ny.us>

Date: 10/21/05 3:32PM

Subject:

RE: Radionuclides Testing Only tri:ium has been detected in the wells--gamma specs showed nothing MW-1i1 had 200,000 pCi/I and the other five on the unit 3 side had trace levels ranging from 470--il 00 pCi/I--MvW-i 11 is much closer to unit 1 and unit 2 SFPs Unit 2 S FP pool tritium levels range from 20 million pCi/A to 60 million depending how soon after an outage when the pool gets mixed with the primary system Unit 1 S FP is about 400,000 pCi/i tritium Peters pis confirm HTO numbers from the SFPs axelson-----Original Message-----

From: Jones, T. R.Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 11:50 AM To: Axolson, William L; Lavera, Ron; Peters, James Cc: Rutkoske, Michael; Mayer, Don; Conroy, Pat; Janicki, John

Subject:

FW: Radionuclides Testing-----Original Message----

From: paul eddy@dps.state.ny.us

[1]

Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:58 AM To: Jones, T. R.Cc: Janicki, John; asaOi @health.state.ny.us; Jrw~nrc.gov

Subject:

Radionuclides Testing TR, Could you please have someone from Entergy answer the following questions:

Other than tritium, have there been any other radionuclides identified in any of the test wells at IPEC?How does the composition of the test well water compare to the Unit 2 spent fuel pool leak, and the UJnit 1 spent fuel pool leak?Paul Eddy 51 8-4E 6-2895 Ltager' 3-----Original Message-----

From: pauLeddy@

dps.state.ny.us

[mailto:paul-eddy@

dps.state.ny.us]

Sent: F:riday, October21, 2005 10:58 AM To: Jones, T. R.Cc: Ja!-icki, John; asaO1 @health.state.ny.us; jrw~nrc.gov

Subject:

Radionuclides Testing TR, Could you please have someone from Entergy answer the following questions:

information in this record was deleNedW 1 In accordance witM the Freedom of Infomatilon Ad. emptions SO FO1A- ( *4C Iq Other ihan tritium, have there been any other radionuclides identified in any of the test wells at IPEC? How does the composition of the test well water compare to the Unit 2 spent fuel pool leak, and the Unit 1 spent fuel pool leak?Paul Eddy 6,KL 518-4E 6-2895 CpagerC ae CC: "'James Noggle'" <JDN~nrc.gov>