ML061010182

E-mail from T. Jones of Entergy to Various, Regarding Radionuclides Testing

ML061010182
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	10/21/2005
From:	Jones T Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Eddy P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, State of NY, Dept of Public Service
References
FOIA/PA-2006-0019
Download: ML061010182 (2)

Text

From: "Jones, T. R." <tjones2 ©entergy.com>

To: "'pauleddycdps.state.ny.us"' <pauLeddy@ dps.state.ny.us>

Date: 10/21/05 3:32PM

Subject:

RE: Radionuclides Testing Only tri:ium has been detected in the wells--gamma specs showed nothing MW-1i1 had 200,000 pCi/I and the other five on the unit 3 side had trace levels ranging from 470--il 00 pCi/I--MvW-i 11 is much closer to unit 1 and unit 2 SFPs Unit 2 SFP pool tritium levels range from 20 million pCi/A to 60 million depending how soon after an outage when the pool gets mixed with the primary system Unit 1 SFP is about 400,000 pCi/i tritium Peters pis confirm HTO numbers from the SFPs axelson

---

Original Message-----

From: Jones, T. R.

Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 11:50 AM To: Axolson, William L; Lavera, Ron; Peters, James Cc: Rutkoske, Michael; Mayer, Don; Conroy, Pat; Janicki, John

Subject:

FW: Radionuclides Testing

---

Original Message----

From: paul eddy@dps.state.ny.us [1]

Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:58 AM To: Jones, T. R.

Cc: Janicki, John; asaOi @health.state.ny.us; Jrw~nrc.gov

Subject:

Radionuclides Testing TR, Could you please have someone from Entergy answer the following questions:

Other than tritium, have there been any other radionuclides identified in any of the test wells at IPEC?

How does the composition of the test well water compare to the Unit 2 spent fuel pool leak, and the UJnit 1 spent fuel pool leak?

Paul Eddy 51 8-4E 6-2895 Ltager' 3

---

Original Message-----

From: pauLeddy@ dps.state.ny.us dps.state.ny.us

Sent: F:riday, October21, 2005 10:58 AM To: Jones, T. R.

Cc: Ja!-icki, John; asaO1 @health.state.ny.us; jrw~nrc.gov

Subject:

Radionuclides Testing TR, Could you please have someone from Entergy answer the following questions:

information in this record was deleNedW 1 Inaccordance witM the Freedom of Infomatilon Ad. emptions SO FO1A- ( *4C Iq

Other ihan tritium, have there been any other radionuclides identified in any of the test wells at IPEC? How does the composition of the test well water compare to the Unit 2 spent fuel pool leak, and the Unit 1 spent fuel pool leak?

Paul Eddy 6,KL 518-4E 6-2895 CpagerC ae CC: "'James Noggle'" <JDN~nrc.gov>