ML18079A831: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF NUCLErlR REGULriTORY Before the Atomic Safetv and Licensing Board In tl:e i:.1a t ter o £ PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GriS CO.MP.'LNY, et al. (Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1) Docket 50-272 (Proposed Issuance of to Facility Operating License No. DPR-70)
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF NUCLErlR REGULriTORY Before the Atomic Safetv and Licensing Board In tl:e i:.1a t ter o £ PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GriS CO.MP.'LNY, et al. (Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1) Docket 50-272 (Proposed Issuance of to Facility Operating License No. DPR-70)
Is J..NSWER TO II I :*10TIC:-1 FOR RECONSIDERZ:..TION OF DISMISSAL OF  
Is J..NSWER TO II I :*10TIC:-1 FOR RECONSIDERZ:..TION OF DISMISSAL OF
[CONTENTION]
[CONTENTION]
NO. S:2VEN" On June 25, 1979, the Public Advocate of New Jersey, representing Mr. and Mrs. rilfred C. Coleman, Jr. in the captioned proceeding, moved for reconsideraticn of of the Colemans' Contention 7 by this Safety and ___!_/ Licensing Board ("Board") . As grounds for reconsideraticn, the Public Advocate cites a decision of the c. S. Court of Appeals for the District of Col u.i-;illia Circuit, :*linnesota  
NO. S:2VEN" On June 25, 1979, the Public Advocate of New Jersey, representing Mr. and Mrs. rilfred C. Coleman, Jr. in the captioned proceeding, moved for reconsideraticn of of the Colemans' Contention 7 by this Safety and ___!_/ Licensing Board ("Board") . As grounds for reconsideraticn, the Public Advocate cites a decision of the c. S. Court of Appeals for the District of Col u.i-;illia Circuit, :*linnesota
: v. ,. --c *,*o -, Q. -_', 2 o'° 9 , ;:::. " 78-2032, (D.C. Cir. May 23, 2.979). discussed below, Licensee, Public Service Electric and Gas Company, et -i opposes ::-.otio:::.
: v. ,. --c *,*o -, Q. -_', 2 o'° 9 , ;:::. " 78-2032, (D.C. Cir. May 23, 2.979). discussed below, Licensee, Public Service Electric and Gas Company, et -i opposes ::-.otio:::.
reconsideration.
reconsideration.
Line 26: Line 26:
0ist=ict o=
0ist=ict o=
Circuit has remanded the two cases pendi::g before it to the Kuclear ?.eg'.J.la tory C:Jrrtl:lis s i.o:::: (
Circuit has remanded the two cases pendi::g before it to the Kuclear ?.eg'.J.la tory C:Jrrtl:lis s i.o:::: (
or "Corrl:rnis s icr. n) fer further ac-=ion regarding a __l 1 I The Board's l978 hearing Conference denied the ?reposed Contentio:::  
or "Corrl:rnis s icr. n) fer further ac-=ion regarding a __l 1 I The Board's l978 hearing Conference denied the ?reposed Contentio:::
: 7.
: 7.
:r-Jth<ll*J 1 0 f-J UI :-s '0 1-*'* r11 I*'* CDOCl>UI Ill r1* I*-* rl* UI l/l :.<:; I**'-rl* 1-'-Ill Ill 1*11 rt* r1* 0 :J* (I) r: w ;J ::J rt* I-' Ill 0* ;Y (D :J w Fl r1* 0 (D :1 UI :J 0 rt* rr th '0 IU r1* 0 rt* m 1*1i :J* I-' ;J OJ rll r1* 0 ::J *1* 1 h rl* CD fli r1* rt 0 r1* :J' 1*11 (IJ w (D tJ Ii 11* [II Ill () ')' '"j 0 io 0, Ii I-' W OJ IJ* Ill ;J CJJ ::1 Ill fll (/) 0* :J ::.S CL UI CD 1-'* CD Cll D* ll' t;* l-1* I--* :J (lJ IJ* 11* Ill m :-r CJ, ": l*h (IJ l*J* ([J Ii en n rn 0 CJ 0 f.: r I ! t* r1* n () !U () : 1 :i I h I I vJ '-. -.., ... ' p, I H I H o. . 111 rt* Iv n n :::i* Ii 0 fll () 1-* f-J n m I-' CD 8 ro m ru :::i 0* lQ I-'* Ill ro !.J p_,,n Ul tJ' f-J Ii I-'* 11* I*'* 0 :.Y ClJ <D ID t*h ::.s Ul 0 Ill ru o rt r:: [11 I*-* ;::.i r** CD p, (1, I-'* H ;:i n. r1* ru :.1 **:i ,._J. rl* 0 Ul CJi rt* ni Ill f-J m u1 r1* o Pi rt* Ul I l 1.J. r: fl, (]J ro r1* 0 ::1* Ii f\J rr (II 11* I-'* 1u ::J I*' .... r1* rt* ::I" :.i* 0 (J) Ill ([) r 1* !.J .. I-'* !JI 'CJ l*i 0 (l w Cl> 0-* I-'* *&#xa3;1 1-** Ul f(" 0 tJ-!J l/l rt* () rt fD n, ru A .... I-'* p, <D :::i () (D u* ru c: rr IJ* I-' rt* :*y (]) () 0 E1 (Jl (ll I-'* 0 :-J H 1D Ill r:: 1-* (D fll ::i !:J () CL <D Ill = lu1 ?i1 "-. f-J I] 0 :.J.. *-j (D *Q I 'D n* r.. m tJ" ...... 8 I-'* () ::.J 1-:: () fl* I-' ro 0 Ill () Ill rt* <: (D [II en 111 rt* CD ti 0 Ul rt ct* .... 0 0 Ii :-J Ill l[l er lll 0 0 'd ::.s ([) Ii :J ti I-'* rl* rt* I-'" l*h (II I-'* r.: n () I-'* ;s fll I-' ct .. (D I-'* Ill (J) r:: <D 0 Iii er ::r fD n () :::i Ill CD I *o fll ti rt I-'* (D Ul :_J" CD Ii (D I*'* :-:i rt* () 'O (l> Ul ru ::i rt* 0 1-h rt :.) .. ID n 0 I-'* Ill Ill I-*'* 0 :::i tJ' IA I-'* :..3 !:j ro p, ,_ .. fJJ rr (j) I_,  
:r-Jth<ll*J 1 0 f-J UI :-s '0 1-*'* r11 I*'* CDOCl>UI Ill r1* I*-* rl* UI l/l :.<:; I**'-rl* 1-'-Ill Ill 1*11 rt* r1* 0 :J* (I) r: w ;J ::J rt* I-' Ill 0* ;Y (D :J w Fl r1* 0 (D :1 UI :J 0 rt* rr th '0 IU r1* 0 rt* m 1*1i :J* I-' ;J OJ rll r1* 0 ::J *1* 1 h rl* CD fli r1* rt 0 r1* :J' 1*11 (IJ w (D tJ Ii 11* [II Ill () ')' '"j 0 io 0, Ii I-' W OJ IJ* Ill ;J CJJ ::1 Ill fll (/) 0* :J ::.S CL UI CD 1-'* CD Cll D* ll' t;* l-1* I--* :J (lJ IJ* 11* Ill m :-r CJ, ": l*h (IJ l*J* ([J Ii en n rn 0 CJ 0 f.: r I ! t* r1* n () !U () : 1 :i I h I I vJ '-. -.., ... ' p, I H I H o. . 111 rt* Iv n n :::i* Ii 0 fll () 1-* f-J n m I-' CD 8 ro m ru :::i 0* lQ I-'* Ill ro !.J p_,,n Ul tJ' f-J Ii I-'* 11* I*'* 0 :.Y ClJ <D ID t*h ::.s Ul 0 Ill ru o rt r:: [11 I*-* ;::.i r** CD p, (1, I-'* H ;:i n. r1* ru :.1 **:i ,._J. rl* 0 Ul CJi rt* ni Ill f-J m u1 r1* o Pi rt* Ul I l 1.J. r: fl, (]J ro r1* 0 ::1* Ii f\J rr (II 11* I-'* 1u ::J I*' .... r1* rt* ::I" :.i* 0 (J) Ill ([) r 1* !.J .. I-'* !JI 'CJ l*i 0 (l w Cl> 0-* I-'* *&#xa3;1 1-** Ul f(" 0 tJ-!J l/l rt* () rt fD n, ru A .... I-'* p, <D :::i () (D u* ru c: rr IJ* I-' rt* :*y (]) () 0 E1 (Jl (ll I-'* 0 :-J H 1D Ill r:: 1-* (D fll ::i !:J () CL <D Ill = lu1 ?i1 "-. f-J I] 0 :.J.. *-j (D *Q I 'D n* r.. m tJ" ...... 8 I-'* () ::.J 1-:: () fl* I-' ro 0 Ill () Ill rt* <: (D [II en 111 rt* CD ti 0 Ul rt ct* .... 0 0 Ii :-J Ill l[l er lll 0 0 'd ::.s ([) Ii :J ti I-'* rl* rt* I-'" l*h (II I-'* r.: n () I-'* ;s fll I-' ct .. (D I-'* Ill (J) r:: <D 0 Iii er ::r fD n () :::i Ill CD I *o fll ti rt I-'* (D Ul :_J" CD Ii (D I*'* :-:i rt* () 'O (l> Ul ru ::i rt* 0 1-h rt :.) .. ID n 0 I-'* Ill Ill I-*'* 0 :::i tJ' IA I-'* :..3 !:j ro p, ,_ .. fJJ rr (j) I_,  
= pi () :;,:: ro .. "' 'd I-' 0 1-i Ill rl* I I-'* ''"" 0 ..........  
= pi () :;,:: ro .. "' 'd I-' 0 1-i Ill rl* I I-'* ''"" 0 ..........
:::i rl* ::.i* ..... Ul 1Q r:: CD UI rr I-'* 0 ::.s 1---' <D t*h r1* rt* 0 0 1*11 H n* f-'* (I) Pl 1--' Ul 0 n* CD 0 :.:i p, I-' () I-'* 0 CD () ::i I-'* Ul Ii 1-'* () !.J r:: ,q I-'* rr o* 0 (/) Pl l*i 8 0 ... Pl Ul :::i p, ;:: fll ::i* rt CD m n* I ::i* w CD '-...Ii !:J 0 0 t*j Ii :.:i* 0 n* Ill r1* l_J* rr CD *< rt* 1u i';" CD IJl ::1 r1" fll IJ* !:1 i.-:: iJ I-' ([l I er ro 0 () s ti I-'* (/) (J) o ::J !J' Pl (J) ;:.I 0 rt* I-'* :.:i Ul rr r:: () rt* ([l p. r1* <D <: fll : I*'* 0 r::: Ul fll r1* 0 ::Cl .... n Ill rt rl* CD 1-i CD fll () rt 0 1-i Ul I-'* ct* CD Pl Ul llJ r::: ty 1--' I-'* n I-'* Ul Ii CD Pl Ul 0 Pl b" I-' CD ru (I) (J) 1-i fll I ::J NO '-... CD b' CD (I) n* () 1-i (0 n. :1 0 rt* rt* !.J .. CD Ii II> l*h r:: (]) f-J Ul rt 0 ti ru *Q (Jl tr ro N  consider any aspect of the remanded question on its own initiati?e.
:::i rl* ::.i* ..... Ul 1Q r:: CD UI rr I-'* 0 ::.s 1---' <D t*h r1* rt* 0 0 1*11 H n* f-'* (I) Pl 1--' Ul 0 n* CD 0 :.:i p, I-' () I-'* 0 CD () ::i I-'* Ul Ii 1-'* () !.J r:: ,q I-'* rr o* 0 (/) Pl l*i 8 0 ... Pl Ul :::i p, ;:: fll ::i* rt CD m n* I ::i* w CD '-...Ii !:J 0 0 t*j Ii :.:i* 0 n* Ill r1* l_J* rr CD *< rt* 1u i';" CD IJl ::1 r1" fll IJ* !:1 i.-:: iJ I-' ([l I er ro 0 () s ti I-'* (/) (J) o ::J !J' Pl (J) ;:.I 0 rt* I-'* :.:i Ul rr r:: () rt* ([l p. r1* <D <: fll : I*'* 0 r::: Ul fll r1* 0 ::Cl .... n Ill rt rl* CD 1-i CD fll () rt 0 1-i Ul I-'* ct* CD Pl Ul llJ r::: ty 1--' I-'* n I-'* Ul Ii CD Pl Ul 0 Pl b" I-' CD ru (I) (J) 1-i fll I ::J NO '-... CD b' CD (I) n* () 1-i (0 n. :1 0 rt* rt* !.J .. CD Ii II> l*h r:: (]) f-J Ul rt 0 ti ru *Q (Jl tr ro N  consider any aspect of the remanded question on its own initiati?e.
Because of the remand's generic nature, it very welJ. be that the Cor:i.Inission decides net to ha'1e this illatter considered in individual adjudicatory proceedings instead, elects to have i .:.. -'-considered in an ongoing or new generic proceeding.
Because of the remand's generic nature, it very welJ. be that the Cor:i.Inission decides net to ha'1e this illatter considered in individual adjudicatory proceedings instead, elects to have i .:.. -'-considered in an ongoing or new generic proceeding.
Line 35: Line 35:
In such an event, no further consideration this 3oard be necessary.
In such an event, no further consideration this 3oard be necessary.
_]_/ \'iith regard to the ":nani&#xa3;est injustice" alleged ':Jy the Public Advocate, such assertions are at l:lest. In any event, anv claim of injury and request redress must be directed to t:"1e Co.mnission, net to this Licensing 3oar*:::.
_]_/ \'iith regard to the ":nani&#xa3;est injustice" alleged ':Jy the Public Advocate, such assertions are at l:lest. In any event, anv claim of injury and request redress must be directed to t:"1e Co.mnission, net to this Licensing 3oar*:::.
To it is quite intervenors will be required to ?Ursue this =atter through 6/ present proceeding.  
To it is quite intervenors will be required to ?Ursue this =atter through 6/ present proceeding.
: v.
: v.
slio op. at ll, """:::;;.
slio op. at ll, """:::;;.
_S_e_-=_-_a_l_s_o_
_S_e_-=_-_a_l_s_o_
Yankee Power Ccrp. v. G.S. 519, n.13 (1978); Cnion of Concerned ?.2d 1069 (D.C. Cir. 1974);  
Yankee Power Ccrp. v. G.S. 519, n.13 (1978); Cnion of Concerned ?.2d 1069 (D.C. Cir. 1974);
: v.
: v.
363 946 (D.C.C. 1973). _]_/ Cols!:',a::1s'  
363 946 (D.C.C. 1973). _]_/ Cols!:',a::1s'
:::irie::  
:::irie::  
..:;. Under these circumstances, the for reconsidera-tion should be denied. July 6, 1979 Respectfully submitted, CONNER, MOORE & CORBER Mark J.
..:;. Under these circumstances, the for reconsidera-tion should be denied. July 6, 1979 Respectfully submitted, CONNER, MOORE & CORBER Mark J.
Counsel for Licensee UNITED STATES OF 1:-iUCLEAR REGUL.;:,_TORY Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the ;;.1atter of PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC fil-iD GAS CO.MPA:::.iY, et al. (Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1) Docket 50-272 (Proposed Issuance 0&#xa3; Amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-70) I hereby certi&#xa3;y that copies of 1 s Ans* .. ;er to 'Intervenors Colemans' Motion for Reconsideration of Dismissal of Colema::is'  
Counsel for Licensee UNITED STATES OF 1:-iUCLEAR REGUL.;:,_TORY Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the ;;.1atter of PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC fil-iD GAS CO.MPA:::.iY, et al. (Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1) Docket 50-272 (Proposed Issuance 0&#xa3; Amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-70) I hereby certi&#xa3;y that copies of 1 s Ans* .. ;er to 'Intervenors Colemans' Motion for Reconsideration of Dismissal of Colema::is'
[Contention]
[Contention]
Seven 11 and 11 Licensee 1 s to by In tervenors, Coleman, to Compel Suppleru.e!'lta tio::i of .?-.nswers to Interrogatories by Licensee, 11 both dated July 6, 1979, in the captioned matter, have been served upon the lowing by deposit in the United States mail this 6th dav of Jllly, 1979: Gary L. Milhollin, Esq. Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 1815 Jefferson Street Madison, Wisconsin 53711 Frederick J. Shon Member, Atomic Safety Licensing 3oard Panel C.S.
Seven 11 and 11 Licensee 1 s to by In tervenors, Coleman, to Compel Suppleru.e!'lta tio::i of .?-.nswers to Interrogatories by Licensee, 11 both dated July 6, 1979, in the captioned matter, have been served upon the lowing by deposit in the United States mail this 6th dav of Jllly, 1979: Gary L. Milhollin, Esq. Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 1815 Jefferson Street Madison, Wisconsin 53711 Frederick J. Shon Member, Atomic Safety Licensing 3oard Panel C.S.

Revision as of 19:20, 25 April 2019

Request Submitted by Util for Denial of Intervenors Coleman 790625 Request for Reconsideration of Dismissal of Coleman Contention 7.NRC Must Remand Matter to Aslb. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML18079A831
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 07/06/1979
From: WETTERHAHN M J
CONNER, MOORE & CORBER
To:
Shared Package
ML18079A830 List:
References
NUDOCS 7908220144
Download: ML18079A831 (6)
v • d • e


Text

UNITED STATES OF NUCLErlR REGULriTORY Before the Atomic Safetv and Licensing Board In tl:e i:.1a t ter o £ PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GriS CO.MP.'LNY, et al. (Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1) Docket 50-272 (Proposed Issuance of to Facility Operating License No. DPR-70)

Is J..NSWER TO II I :*10TIC:-1 FOR RECONSIDERZ:..TION OF DISMISSAL OF

[CONTENTION]

NO. S:2VEN" On June 25, 1979, the Public Advocate of New Jersey, representing Mr. and Mrs. rilfred C. Coleman, Jr. in the captioned proceeding, moved for reconsideraticn of of the Colemans' Contention 7 by this Safety and ___!_/ Licensing Board ("Board") . As grounds for reconsideraticn, the Public Advocate cites a decision of the c. S. Court of Appeals for the District of Col u.i-;illia Circuit, :*linnesota

v. ,. --c *,*o -, Q. -_', 2 o'° 9 , ;:::. " 78-2032, (D.C. Cir. May 23, 2.979). discussed below, Licensee, Public Service Electric and Gas Company, et -i opposes ::-.otio:::.

reconsideration.

It is undisputed th2t Court c=

0ist=ict o=

Circuit has remanded the two cases pendi::g before it to the Kuclear ?.eg'.J.la tory C:Jrrtl:lis s i.o:::: (

or "Corrl:rnis s icr. n) fer further ac-=ion regarding a __l 1 I The Board's l978 hearing Conference denied the ?reposed Contentio:::

7.
r-Jth<ll*J 1 0 f-J UI :-s '0 1-*'* r11 I*'* CDOCl>UI Ill r1* I*-* rl* UI l/l :.<:; I**'-rl* 1-'-Ill Ill 1*11 rt* r1* 0 :J* (I) r: w ;J ::J rt* I-' Ill 0* ;Y (D :J w Fl r1* 0 (D :1 UI :J 0 rt* rr th '0 IU r1* 0 rt* m 1*1i :J* I-' ;J OJ rll r1* 0 ::J *1* 1 h rl* CD fli r1* rt 0 r1* :J' 1*11 (IJ w (D tJ Ii 11* [II Ill () ')' '"j 0 io 0, Ii I-' W OJ IJ* Ill ;J CJJ ::1 Ill fll (/) 0* :J ::.S CL UI CD 1-'* CD Cll D* ll' t;* l-1* I--* :J (lJ IJ* 11* Ill m :-r CJ, ": l*h (IJ l*J* ([J Ii en n rn 0 CJ 0 f.: r I ! t* r1* n () !U () : 1 :i I h I I vJ '-. -.., ... ' p, I H I H o. . 111 rt* Iv n n :::i* Ii 0 fll () 1-* f-J n m I-' CD 8 ro m ru :::i 0* lQ I-'* Ill ro !.J p_,,n Ul tJ' f-J Ii I-'* 11* I*'* 0 :.Y ClJ <D ID t*h ::.s Ul 0 Ill ru o rt r:: [11 I*-* ;::.i r** CD p, (1, I-'* H ;:i n. r1* ru :.1 **:i ,._J. rl* 0 Ul CJi rt* ni Ill f-J m u1 r1* o Pi rt* Ul I l 1.J. r: fl, (]J ro r1* 0 ::1* Ii f\J rr (II 11* I-'* 1u ::J I*' .... r1* rt* ::I" :.i* 0 (J) Ill ([) r 1* !.J .. I-'* !JI 'CJ l*i 0 (l w Cl> 0-* I-'* *£1 1-** Ul f(" 0 tJ-!J l/l rt* () rt fD n, ru A .... I-'* p, <D :::i () (D u* ru c: rr IJ* I-' rt* :*y (]) () 0 E1 (Jl (ll I-'* 0 :-J H 1D Ill r:: 1-* (D fll ::i !:J () CL <D Ill = lu1 ?i1 "-. f-J I] 0 :.J.. *-j (D *Q I 'D n* r.. m tJ" ...... 8 I-'* () ::.J 1-:: () fl* I-' ro 0 Ill () Ill rt* <: (D [II en 111 rt* CD ti 0 Ul rt ct* .... 0 0 Ii :-J Ill l[l er lll 0 0 'd ::.s ([) Ii :J ti I-'* rl* rt* I-'" l*h (II I-'* r.: n () I-'* ;s fll I-' ct .. (D I-'* Ill (J) r:: <D 0 Iii er ::r fD n () :::i Ill CD I *o fll ti rt I-'* (D Ul :_J" CD Ii (D I*'* :-:i rt* () 'O (l> Ul ru ::i rt* 0 1-h rt :.) .. ID n 0 I-'* Ill Ill I-*'* 0 :::i tJ' IA I-'* :..3 !:j ro p, ,_ .. fJJ rr (j) I_,

= pi () :;,:: ro .. "' 'd I-' 0 1-i Ill rl* I I-'* "" 0 ..........

i rl* ::.i* ..... Ul 1Q r:: CD UI rr I-'* 0 ::.s 1---' <D t*h r1* rt* 0 0 1*11 H n* f-'* (I) Pl 1--' Ul 0 n* CD 0 :.:i p, I-' () I-'* 0 CD () ::i I-'* Ul Ii 1-'* () !.J r:: ,q I-'* rr o* 0 (/) Pl l*i 8 0 ... Pl Ul :::i p, ;:: fll ::i* rt CD m n* I ::i* w CD '-...Ii !:J 0 0 t*j Ii :.:i* 0 n* Ill r1* l_J* rr CD *< rt* 1u i';" CD IJl ::1 r1" fll IJ* !:1 i.-:: iJ I-' ([l I er ro 0 () s ti I-'* (/) (J) o ::J !J' Pl (J) ;:.I 0 rt* I-'* :.:i Ul rr r:: () rt* ([l p. r1* <D <: fll : I*'* 0 r::: Ul fll r1* 0 ::Cl .... n Ill rt rl* CD 1-i CD fll () rt 0 1-i Ul I-'* ct* CD Pl Ul llJ r::: ty 1--' I-'* n I-'* Ul Ii CD Pl Ul 0 Pl b" I-' CD ru (I) (J) 1-i fll I ::J NO '-... CD b' CD (I) n* () 1-i (0 n. :1 0 rt* rt* !.J .. CD Ii II> l*h r:: (]) f-J Ul rt 0 ti ru *Q (Jl tr ro N consider any aspect of the remanded question on its own initiati?e.

Because of the remand's generic nature, it very welJ. be that the Cor:i.Inission decides net to ha'1e this illatter considered in individual adjudicatory proceedings instead, elects to have i .:.. -'-considered in an ongoing or new generic proceeding.

The c. c.:..rcui t 6/ clearly leaves such an alternative open to the Commission.

In such an event, no further consideration this 3oard be necessary.

_]_/ \'iith regard to the ":nani£est injustice" alleged ':Jy the Public Advocate, such assertions are at l:lest. In any event, anv claim of injury and request redress must be directed to t:"1e Co.mnission, net to this Licensing 3oar*:::.

To it is quite intervenors will be required to ?Ursue this =atter through 6/ present proceeding.

v.

slio op. at ll, """:::;;.

_S_e_-=_-_a_l_s_o_

Yankee Power Ccrp. v. G.S. 519, n.13 (1978); Cnion of Concerned ?.2d 1069 (D.C. Cir. 1974);

v.

363 946 (D.C.C. 1973). _]_/ Cols!:',a::1s'

irie::

..:;. Under these circumstances, the for reconsidera-tion should be denied. July 6, 1979 Respectfully submitted, CONNER, MOORE & CORBER Mark J.

Counsel for Licensee UNITED STATES OF 1:-iUCLEAR REGUL.;:,_TORY Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the ;;.1atter of PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC fil-iD GAS CO.MPA:::.iY, et al. (Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1) Docket 50-272 (Proposed Issuance 0£ Amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-70) I hereby certi£y that copies of 1 s Ans* .. ;er to 'Intervenors Colemans' Motion for Reconsideration of Dismissal of Colema::is'

[Contention]

Seven 11 and 11 Licensee 1 s to by In tervenors, Coleman, to Compel Suppleru.e!'lta tio::i of .?-.nswers to Interrogatories by Licensee, 11 both dated July 6, 1979, in the captioned matter, have been served upon the lowing by deposit in the United States mail this 6th dav of Jllly, 1979: Gary L. Milhollin, Esq. Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 1815 Jefferson Street Madison, Wisconsin 53711 Frederick J. Shon Member, Atomic Safety Licensing 3oard Panel C.S.

Com.mission Washingtcn, D.C. 20555 Dr. James c.

III Z..ls:nbe.:-, Atomic S2.::ety and Board ?a:::el 313 Woodhaven Road Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel C.S. Nuclear Co::i..-nission D. c. 20555 Chairman, Atomic Safety Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Barry Smith, 2sq. Office of Legal Directer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

\*lashi:::gtcn, D. C. Deputy General Depa!:"t.uent of and :?ublic Saf et.y Environraental Protection Section 36 West State Street Trenton, 08625 Richard ?ryling, Jr., Esq. Assistant General Solicitor Public Service Electric & Gas Company 80 Park ?lace Newark, N. J. 07101 Keith Onsdorf=, Esq. Assistant Deputy Public Advocate Department of the Public Advocate Division of Public Interest Advocacy Post Office Box 141 Trenton, N. J. 08601 Sandra T.

Esq. Departnent of the Public _;.dvocate 520 East State Street Trenton, N. J.. 08625 Mr. Alfred C. Coleman, Jr. Mrs. Eleanor G. Coleman 35 11:{11 Drive Pennsville, Jersey 08070 Carl Valore, Jr., Esq. Valore, McAllister, Aron & Wes tr:1ore lar:d Plaza P. O. Box l/5 Northfield, N. CS225 Office of t2e Docketing and Service Section U.S.

Cormniss ion Washington, Q. C. 20555 June D.

Esq. Deputy Attorney General Tatnall Building, P. O. 3ox 1401 Dover, Delaware 19901

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18079A831&oldid=1506710"