ML13003A031

Report No. MPR-3815, Rev. 3, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page C-334 Through Page C-399

ML13003A031
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	11/16/2012
From:	Schlaseman C S MPR Associates
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Exelon Generation Co
References
RS-12-173 MPR-3815, Rev 3
Download: ML13003A031 (66)

Text

Sheet 1 of 2 Statuso N.U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0quip. Class12+., t;. ,'J Location:

Bldg. eg- Foor El. 01Itz 7,Room, Aea Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the' Seismic Walkdown of an itom of e quipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questinýs may'be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NP(of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the an chorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?j'~ v~c~ 'g~cod C 69 ýJt4 OL~L 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?.

YelrJN U[3 N/Afl UF" N/A[" UiJ N/AE]4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the. concrete near the anchors? ." NQ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO] NEI U NIA)ýY,<N0 UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4 C-3 >.Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrm'nnndPnr.P Nn R=-19'-171 C-334 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 5"-03.2-!fE'1 quip. Class 1 (j o) r , -s Equipment Description 4 -P'- P ja: Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets fre. from impact by nearby equipment or structures?: UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and asonry block walls not likely to collapse ontothe eq ipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y~pa0 UQ N/AD YaNr U0 N/AQ Yg[- U0 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJN"I UDI adversely affect the safety functiosof equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: A4 A-Date: -7 )S/ -Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Tnrrm..RnnndPnrn-Nn* RR-19-17.C-335 z o*(A 0 cn 0:5 N)m 3o CD cj, Equipment ID: TS-20224-02 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrP.qnnndP.nrP Nn* RR-19-17.C-337 Table C-2. Unit 0 Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs)Anchor Component Description Configuration Ux-YY ID Confirmed?

00B061 Pump Structure MCC E224-P-A N U0-13 00C29B Emergency Protection Relay Board Y UO-6 0AC097 Diesel Generator OAG12 Control Panel Y U0-2*0AG012 El Standby Diesel Generator Y U0-2*0AP060 El D/G Fuel Oil Transfer Pump , N UO-2 0AP163 Emergency Service Water Booster Pump N U0-1*A OAT040 El Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Day Tank Y U0-2*0AT096 El Diesel Generator Lube Oil Storage N U0-2*Tank 0AV030 Control Room Emerg Vent Supply Fan A Y U0-8*0AV036 Battery Room Exhaust Fan A Y UO-1 0 0AV064 D/G Building Vent Supply Fan Y U0-9 0BK032 Emergency Cooling Tower Fan B Y UO-3 0BP057 Emergency Service Water Pump B Y U3-3*0BV030 Control Room Emergency Ventilation Y U0-8 Supply Fan B 0BV035 Emergency Switchgear Ventilation Y U0-10*Exhaust Fan B 0BV036 Battery Room Exhaust Fan B Y U0-10*0DE377 E4 Diesel Generator Lube Oil Cooler Y UO-11 0DG012 E4 Standby Diesel Generator Y U0-11*ODPO60 E4 D/G Fuel Oil Transfer Pump N U0-11*ODT40 E4 Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Day Tank Y U0-11*0DV064 D/G Building Vent Supply Fan Y UO-12 0HT95 E4 Diesel Generator Starting Air Y U0-11*Reservoir AO-33-0241 D ESW Outlet Block Valve from Diesel N UO-l1*Generator E4 Coolers MO-0 ESW Return to Discharge Pond N/A UO-1 0498 MO-48-0501A ESW A Inlet to ECT Reservoir N/A UO-4 PO-0-40F-Master for El EDG Building Vent Supply N U0-9*00272-01 Fan Outside Air Damper PO-0-40F-Master for El EDG Building Vent Supply N U0-9*00272-02 Fan Return Air Damper TCV-0-52E-DIG Jacket Coolant 3-Way Thermostatic N/A U0-2*7239A Control Valve TS-0607D E4 D/G Jacket Coolant Temperature N/A U0-1 1 Sensor I Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Correspondence No.: RS-12-173 C-338 Status:N NU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. t -2q -P- A Equip. Class- (0o) 1 C-c.Equipment Description ( &41 nj) r.,,

nto~r -,-i (iaJ-e Location:

Bldg. fP', Floortl. ',.. Room,,Area J1.. Hes/fv,,F rl,-.-, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NIK of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

,2,Is'the anchoragfreobn, t" "".gefree'of ben rokeif,missing or loose hardware?"4. ... ... ... .YZ NO UO N/AO]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosiQn that is more than mild surface YAjNI'I Ur N/AF oxid ation?/' d Or~ v t fl%('cqta e 1 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YJ..N[I" UE" N/AE]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] NE] UE] N/AgXj (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.(C-3>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrm.nnndrinrý-p Nn *R, 17.C-339 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. t 2.Z q -Equip. Class'2 (0 1 ) MCc C Equipment Description (KS0o6) £nduy (f+ov, C.t",) " r Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Ah la :'8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? 0- 4 f1C,,j/ <i, .-*t, ' "q p.oi: ;43'9NQ Y FEPN UCI N/A-UDI N/AQ UE" N/AD1 YANO UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked fMy and. found no other seismic condi'hons thatcould NC"N U-I adversely affect the safety, functions of the equipment?

IT$Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Evaluated by: Date: Dae Y24/i< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn* R.q-19-17.

C-340 D ;o~CD W~ 0 0:3 m OU C)0 0 0 C)

-.0* 0 c~.0 0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:3 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 00C29B Equip. Class'2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Emergenc Protection Relay Board Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 , Room, Area T2-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

%Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?een A'eda/ t- Aetne / 1 -" 6 o,1c(cL/t AID rCAel YX NEI YM N[:1 Ul N/ALL YP NEI Ui] N/Al]Y/M NI] Ul] N/A[].5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y14 NI] Ul] N/A-.(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

,- So -I-k11 Skc/, -6 3,4v0, a' Vwy bl .6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free.of YIP NI] Ul]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Crnr.nnndrnrp Nn ' R!.-19-17.1 C-343 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 00C29B Equip. Class1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Emergena Protection Relay Board Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

...8.- Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?.NE UD N/AD YJ] NE UD N/AD YO NO ULI N/AD YP NUCI E ..Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you. looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI U .I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

"-Ao I),e.,4ee11Wo'9 foC OlsýEvaluated by: Date: gArIl 0 21pb-z-C, il4~LL~~<C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrmnnndPnr.A Nn

• RR-19-171 C-344

1. ~4 / $,-0o 0 (3 ,J o 03 m 30 CD C)0 0 N)to ca

-~0* 0 C: m 3 CD 0 0 N)co w Sheet 1 of 2 Status-N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0AC097 Equip. Class" 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Diesel Generator OAG12 Control Panel Location:

Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 127 Room, Area D/G-3 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y4 NO YOJ NE U- N/ADl Y" NO UD N/AEl YEJ NO UO- N/A[l Yj NOI UI- N/AD Y, .N- O.12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.-K C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrmnnndi1nrAp Nn -RR-19-171 C-347 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0AC097 Equip. Class'2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Diesel Generator OAG12 Control Panel Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is' equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI UD N/AE YKg NE UD N/AD YK NE UQ N/AO Yj] NEI UI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ypa NE UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 6Le Cr- ck r e MOto Evaluated by: Date: ?,a-/,ia-.

1 /2-5-42-it f Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3'nrr..qnnnHPnr.P N

• RR-12-17R C-348

-U 0~CD3 C. 0 0 CD m-o CD (D 0 0 co Sheet I of 2 Status:OY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OAGO12 Equip. Class'2 (17) Engine Generators Equipment Description El Standby Diesel Generator Location:

Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 127 Room, Area D/G-3 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings..

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y( NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YR9 NEI UE] N/AFI 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN N[] U-' N/A]l oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YOg NEI UD] N/AC]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YP(N; U!] N/AC](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y$ NEI U!]potentially adverse seismic conditions?5Ol e-U -I (rzev ) ? Jes 1'N " ,A641,r 6 ,//S .bo/P3 e 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<.C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 C-350 rlnrrA.nnndPn.cP Nn -RR-19-171 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. OAGO12 Equip. Class 1 2 (17) Engine Generators Equipment Description El Standby Diesel Generator Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y;8 NEI UI N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

4 ee,',r t0,1'es or e r J4nr" 4/od/A.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yo~ NI UI N/AI YJW NI UI N/AI.Y NEI UL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NI] UI]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 5 e(5's,/( nesl/,ýiA h&L-e eýee' pt ee/~ 4 MeiL~M?~', 1,F-W ,-?<l b /-4 lr,~/t>-~.

'~' 4~'Evaluated by: l Date: # )-V1//C-44 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rlnrrnnndnPnr..

Nn

• RR-19-171 C-351

-p Wo0 id m 30 CD K -0 z o 20 3 C. 0 (0 cn m-a CD C)G) x: C*r~OCD 0 3.m 30 CD C) .0 z ou 0~ 3.0:3 z m.0 C*0 2 CD 5 0 0 0 N,

-0 36 co 0 D 3'3:0 Er)m.0 C 2 CD-I.0 0 0 M Sheet 1 of 2 Status:Q N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OAP060 Equip. Class" 2 (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description El DIG Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Location:

Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 12 Area D/G-3 Building I -Manufacturer, Model, Etc.. (optional'but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE] M Yp]NEIh UDE N/Afl Y[O NE UE" NJAE 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? NEI UIE- N/AE]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NE UE N/Ap]YqNE UE 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Cnrrqnnnr1Pnr..

Nn* RfR-19-171 C-357 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. OAP060 Equip. Class 1 2 (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description El DIG Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

4/o -4§4 "Výd 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Thd elv titer orb Ktviy fUcs ew.ete'9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y4 ND UD N/AD YZND UD N/AD Y9 ND UD N/AD YPND UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could. YN NND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added. as necessary) 0 A*ol Evaluated by: 1~L#ErI Date: _!_7 _ _)_1_.'11 2)1 I2,<C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 C'.nrrP.nnndPnr.A Nn R.M-19-171 C-358 S-0-~ 0 0 3 m*-CD0-a 0 0 Sheet I of 2 Status' N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0AP163 Equip. Class 1 2 (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Emergency Service Water Booster Pump A Location:

Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. i 21wh yezRooni, Area DIG-]Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the-results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NoNE UI N/AO YN ND UI3 N/AL Ypa ND UL N/AU YE ND UD N/AI9 YO NO UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrr.nnnr1P.nrP-Nn R;-1-17.C-360 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. OAP 163 Equip. Class 1 2 (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Emergency Service Water Booster Pump A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YD NDI UD N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YW NDI UD] N/AD]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

LiAthed ls ave tfee fl ecxb reiiyt 4^4dm a 1-o YAe- eiel UII /Al f~~Abb~~~/b ea/ d~~' 5-e./S'ix'c -et'en14 N~to ceZýU ust~t or £-s-n1~4 d 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? PI1 NDI UD N/ADI 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?~NEIUD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YK NDI UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: /7 /-/& 9= Ab-.ji / 2 S'ýJ/ 2-<C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 CnrrP-qnnndrnr.P Nn

• RR-19-171 C-361

-0 a)z *0* 0'a'3 -m-3 CD 2z co

-.0 03-~ 0-0 0 r'3 m-o C-5.2 CD 5 0-u C)C..,

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -O4A-4O SAA 0/26-- Equip. Class 1 2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description El Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Day Tank Location:

Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 127 Room, Area D/G-3 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification-required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YR NEINiO UU N/AU YK NEI UL] N/AD Y!( NE UD N/AU 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN NEI UD N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for, which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

j3mi /, 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y)NU 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<( C-3 >, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrPnnndPnr.

Nn* RR-19-171 C-364 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. OAT40 Equip. Class 1 2-(21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description El Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Day Tank Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

/11 0 L-45 :r ce,7 1,7--5 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YP NEI UE- N/AO YVJ NEI ULI N/AO Y% NEl UE- N/AO YK NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:~Ar~I.Date: ~/&z:0 / 41,).-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn

• RR-19-173 C-365 X CD!.0 co)m'-o 3 C C 0-I Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0AT096 Equip. Class'2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Horizontal)

Equipment Description El Diesel Generator Lube Oil Storage Tank Location:

Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 127 Room, Area D/G-3 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YO NM Y; NEI UE1 N/AE YKI NEI UE N/AE Yp NEI UE N/AE3 YEI NEI UE N/AsW% NEI UE-5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

... .L .:.." ../= z,, I '-'., 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.>" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 flnrrP.nnnr;pnr-.a Nn RR-19-171 C-367 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0AT096 Equip. Class'2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Horizontal)

Equipment Description El Diesel Generator Lube Oil Storage Tank Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YX[ NO UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIM No UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? " Y4 ND UD N/AD Y NEI UD.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y20 ND UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: __________--

I47 VI2-< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrP..qnnndr1nr.

Nn

• RR-19-17.C-368

-w:3 ooa*0 m 3o CD E5 C)0)

Sh t1of2 Status6 N U Seismic Walkdown Clieckit- (SWC)Equipment ID No. n&Al/ 0"30 Equip. Class 1 2 Location:

Bldg. Floor El. I:(. Roon, AA fl-ca'Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This chedlist may~be used tp document the results of the Seismic WaikdownOf an item of equipment on th SWEL. The spa~ce below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for doctimenting other comments." .. "rage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y ,ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? , Y Q-'i UO N/AD-'reelo' .-/.3. Is the anchorage free ofor osion that is more than mild surface ur- N/AI oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YP-I 0rU' N/AD Y ND* UI N/AD'Y;NO U-' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrýnnnrPnr.P.

Nn" R.R-19-17.

C-370 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3 Equip. Class'a (40) f Equipment Description "V43d , ._v-. .,i ..1 // lv f Interaction Effects 7. Are sort targets free. frtn impact by nearby equipment or structures?.

r -(YIfNO UQ N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM N[] U[] N/AQ-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto te equipment?

9. Do attache lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? " Y;Nr-I UQ N/Ar 46,: tased oji thfe above, s&ismki interaction evaluations, is equipinent free.of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?-YKN[3 U[3 I,-. *l. ..~* >1 *~*4~: Other Advere Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y4..NO" UOI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date:/(I L Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 No" R.9-1 .9-I C-371

-p;a ooa 5" z p -U 0 c m CD 0.0 CD urn~ 3* 0 0 c m m C.CD 0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0AV036 Equip. Class 1 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description Batter Room Exhaust Fan A Location:

Bldg. Radwaste Floor El. 165 Room, Area R/W-32 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yý9NEI N NEI ULJ N/Al YNO(E UO N/AOl NO UO N/Anl Y NOE UJ N/AOl Y9NEI UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 )I Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrmnnnH1nr.A.

Nn

• RR-19-17.1 C-374 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0AV036 Equip. Class 1 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description Battery Room Exhaust Fan A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

AfNearAy QYlcJuS Ojeju/cfey 5VfpfxQ Ae TWO;6 ANKUdWO uJrn. rTO jotrf.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction eyaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NEI Ufl N/AQ YtKN- UO N/AD Y(N5 UEI N/AD YK NE Ufl Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y"'NEI UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comet (Aprges ad P as1 ne0es sa Comments (dditional pages may be added as necessary) t/IA Evaluated by: w Evlute b:Date: 0./___o __WI~O/~j~ 1 K C-4 A>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn* RR-19-171 C-375 CD:5. 0* 0'IEA -ulo CCD 00

-a)~(~),~~* 0~, -u (D-1 ~0 C r'J m-o C-5.2 CD~6*5 0 0 CA)C)

-w z o 0 3A* 0 m 3 CD C)0 0 C,)

3 0a 0)c.3 D 03 ,~-0 L ci, c m 3a CD 0)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0AV064 Equip. Class 1 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description DIG Building Vent Supply Fan Location:

Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 151 Room, Area DIG Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

/UMOAqW OLOWtQR ivAi k3 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YR(NO YIA'NO U' N/AU Y[D/ND UL N/AU YEif NEI Ue N/All]Y[fNO UO N/AO YB'NE UED 1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrP-nnnP~nr.P.

Nn* RR-19-173 C-380 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0AV064 Equip. Class" 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description DIG Building Vent Supply Fan Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

jJ0 5Or-T TAROL7,TS' Yd'NL UEJ N/AOl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[LI" NEI ULI N/AL!and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

00JO VO 1, C6MF0N&A16T-1'3

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEND UO N/Ab YENO ULI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE( N[D UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

ViA Evaluated by:~AK9~4J Date: L. L2t SYW?/2612 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rlnrrP.qnnndr.nr.P.

Nn

• RR-19-17.C-381 a- R)z-0-. 0 m 0 CD

-0,;o, l-.0 z 0 0 3.0 0%m-o 3 C 0 0r CN Sheet I of 2 Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0BK032 Equip. Class 1 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description Emergenc Cooling Tower Fan B Location:

Bldg. Emergenc Floor El. 195 Room, Area ECT-6 Cooling Towers Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YVQ NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YR NEI ULI N/AL!3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YIE NEI U'] N/AEl oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEi NE! UV- N/A['5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YI/NNE1 U!] N/AL!(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorae configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y4 NEI ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

a~r LO-Cccj-tj j'kS'4te-

+h 0 (c U w ,- W.Je,-12 Enter the equipment:class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 (TnrrPnnnrPnrP.

Nn -RR-19-17T C-384 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0BK032 Equip. Class 1 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description Emergency Cooling Tower Fan B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

ýs L-coc+eA odveý vrboo4of Ec.T. TILC,w tcorot, n~o ot-V.-Pl.Us a&. f7,L,, -e- A.V 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YM NEI U[D N/Al YNE UD N/AD Yý NO UJ N/AU YJqNO UB Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y']L NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:.Date: Y/2-/Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn *RR-1 9-17.A C-385 u 10* 0 C,)z ou 0a -W c 0.m-o 3 m C 2 C)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0BP057 Equip. Class 1 2 (06) Vertical Pumps Equipment Description Emergenc Service Water Pump B .A,', 4lqa/j'&qr-Location:

Bldg. Pump Structure Floor El. 112 Room, Area P/H-' g (Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorai~1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YkrNEI YX NOi UE- N/AEl Y NEI UI] N/AE'YV NEI UE] N/AU]YKNEI UEI N/A[]UDI 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

C-33>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrP.mnnnr1Pnr.P Nn

• RR-19-171 C-387 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0BP057 Equip. Class 1 2 (06) Vertical Pumps Equipment Description Emerggency Service Water Pump B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines.have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YXNEI UDI N/AQ W- NE UEr N/AQ YNEI UO N/AO: Y)< NE UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ND1 ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipent , d c ->14eeA-,-*vti*-

4 04A c6rej'Ak'?

6L~ v~Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)5C,,_ -OI ,. W/ T1.._b T,.,, DW /, Evaluated by: Evaluated by: Date: Date:r< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrPnnndPnrA.

Nn *- P-'19-17.C-388 CA 0 m.0 C-5.(D 5 0 w-o 0 (7'-.1 X~C=rw-.0 3 CD3 Z C)0 r rm 30 CD C)cn*4 Sheet 1 of 2 StatusD. N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OBV030 Equip. Class" 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description Control Room Emergeny Ventilation Supply Fan B Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. f5IC&16 Room, Area"-&-.

F-Qi /9007_.t Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YJ NEI Yg ND UD N/AD Y-P ND UD N/AD Y/29 NDI UV N/AD YPO NDI UD N/AD Ila 1- 7 7 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yo NEIUE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 ), Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn

• R.-19-17.1 C-391 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. OBV030 Equip. Class" 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description Control Room Emergenc Ventilation Supply Fan B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

gIo 0 F- lwrý&/5 YP NO UE] N/AD--8. Are-overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yf N' U['D N/AD. .and masonry block walls not likely to collaps onto the equipment?

7?" /o~ec~d(

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y)@ ND UQ N/Afl Y,~EU Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI UOI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y'-4k F&41roV.4--/,s k or Fec -eed/Ve- AV--. ,oA ev , 4 10 u/4v (#1 " Date: L/LS/ -__________________________

/0 g 'i-/Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 (.nrrPqnndnlnr.P.

Nn

• R.-19-173 C-392 coa 0 g R;o-m> ~3 0 C 0 c Z .m.0 C)CA.C=5 00 0

-0w-~0 z *0 z 0 Cl m 3 m~0 C 0 0 0 B)CA)* C/)3 m.0 CD 5 00 C0 I;Ko0 0 (D-0 ci, m-0 C.-D CD C~)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0BV035 Equip. Class" 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description Emergency Switchgear Ventilation Exhaust Fan B Location:

Bldg. Radwaste Floor El. 165 Room, Area R/W-32 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y& NIEI YXNLI UIl] N/AE YX NEI U[] N/Al 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

P-T-C1si bi4 62 ?0 -E -q7A--d, '.6, 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y9f Nil U- N/All]Y9NEI U[:]1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

SC-3 >, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrPqnnndPnrP-Nn

• RR-19-17.1 C-397 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 0BV035 Equip. Class1 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description Emergency Switchgear Ventilation Exhaust Fan B Interaction Effects.7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

A/0 8.: Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

• sve'r l W c o, 4 a4 QVwrhE'G(J b~+ oil vell 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y)/N[] UO N/AO YX NO Ur1 N/AO Y'NI- UEJ N/AO Y)4NEI U ..Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could [] U !3 adversely affe t the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al/A Evaluated by: nAdci2C#~44IL Date: (0 o/W1 / .~V3wt7 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 flnrrPqnnndPnrP Nn " RR-19-17.C-398

-.0'CD>* 0 cn-4 m-o C.5-2 CD B 0 w 0 01