W3F1-2007-0044, Startup Test Activity Reduction (STAR) Summary Report from 14th Refueling Outage

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Startup Test Activity Reduction (STAR) Summary Report from 14th Refueling Outage
ML073460343
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/10/2007
From: Murillo R
Entergy Nuclear South
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
W3F1-2007-0044, WCAP-16011-P-A, Rev 0
Download: ML073460343 (19)
v • d • e


Text

Entergy Nuclear South Entergy Operations, Inc.

17265 River Road Killona, LA 70057-3093 Tel 504-739-6715 Fax 504-739-6698 rmurill@entergy.com Robert J. Murillo Licensing Manager Waterford 3 W3F1-2007-0044 December 10, 2007 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

Subject:

Startup Test Activity Reduction (STAR) Summary Report Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3)

Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38

REFERENCE:

WCAP-16011-P-A, Revision 0, "Startup Test Activity Reduction Program," February 2005

Dear Sir or Madam:

Waterford 3 resumed operation on December 27, 2006, from the fourteenth refueling outage (RF14). During the startup from that outage, Entergy Operations applied the methodology presented in the Westinghouse Owner's Group. (WOG) Startup Test Activity Reduction (STAR) program (Reference above). This program changes the reload startup testing to reduce testing operations and testing time while achieving the following objectives: (1) ensure that the core can be operated as designed, and (2) employ normal operating practices in the startup evolution. In this context, the use of the reactivity computer is not considered. to be a normal operating practice.

As part of their approval, the NRC added three conditions and limitations to the topical report in their safety evaluation (SE). These conditions and limitations are:

1. The STAR program is applicable only to the participating plants as defined in Table 3-1 of the topical report.
2. Should any of the STAR test results fall outside of the test criteria, either ascertain that the safety analysis and STAR applicability requirements are satisfied, or discontinue use of the STAR program for that fuel cycle.

W3F1-2007-0044 Page 2

3. Each licensee using STAR is required to submit a summary report following the first application of STAR to its plant, whether successful or not. The report should (a) identify the core design method used, (b) compare the measured and calculated values and the differences between these values to the corresponding core design method uncertainties and (c) show compliance with the STAR applicability requirements. If the application of STAR is unsuccessful, identify the reasons why the STAR application failed.

The purpose of this letter is to document Waterford 3's (W3's) compliance to these conditions and limitations.

Table 3-1 of the above Reference lists W3 as a participating plant. Therefore, the STAR Program is applicable to the W3 Cycle 15 reload core.

All of the requirements to implement STAR for RF14 were met. STAR was implemented successfully during this outage. The measured test results for all the required STAR tests in Table 3-3 of the above reference were within the test criteria.

The summary report required by the third condition of the aforementioned SE is attached.

Portions of the report are of a proprietary nature to Westinghouse. The non-proprietary version is included as Attachment 1 of this letter. A proprietary version is enclosed as Attachment 3 to the cover letter. Proprietary information is enclosed in brackets.

Superscripts 'a' and 'c' refer to Affidavit paragraphs. The Affidavit for withholding information is included in Attachment 2 to this letter. Based on the Affidavit, Entergy requests that the information which is proprietary to Westinghouse be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390.

W3 implemented the STAR program in accordance with Attachment A, "Implementation of the STAR program" of Attachment A to Appendix G of the referenced topical.

This letter does not contain any NRC commitments. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Greg Scott at (504)-739-6703.

Sincerely, RJM/GCS/dpg Attachment(s):

1. Startup Test Activity Reduction (STAR) Summary Report for RF14 [Non-Proprietary]
2. Affidavit Pursuant 10 CFR 2.390
3. Startup Test Activity Reduction (STAR) Summary Report for RF14 [Proprietary]

W3F1-2007-0044 Page 3 cc: Mr. Elmo E. Collins, Jr.

Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit 3 P.O. Box 822 Killona, LA 70066-0751 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. N. Kalyanam Mail Stop O-07D1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway ATTN: J. Smith P.O. Box 651 Jackson, MS 39205 Winston & Strawn ATTN: N.S. Reynolds 1,700 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3817 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP ATTN: T.C. Poindexter 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004

Attachment I to W3F1-2007-0044 Startup Test Activity Reduction (STAR)

Summary Report for RF14

[Non-Proprietary]

to W3F1-2007-0044 NON-PROPRIETARY Page 1 of 13

SUMMARY

REPORT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STAR PROGRAM AT W3 DURING RF14 Core Design Method The Waterford 3 (W3) Cycle 15 reload core used Westinghouse's ANC/PARAGON as the design method.

This method has been reviewed and approved by the NRC (References 1 through 4).

Comparison of Measured to Calculated Values Application of the Startup Test Activity Reduction (STAR) program for Cycle 15 allowed the elimination of Control Element Assembly (CEA) worth measurements from the low power physics testing program and allowed for alternate moderator temperature coefficient (MTC) surveillance. The elimination of this measurement and the use of the alternate surveillance are acceptable per the STAR program since the STAR Applicability Requirements have been satisfie~d and documented.

Tables 1, 3, and 4 provide the results from the Cycle 15 STAR program tests. All STAR Program test criteria were met. Therefore, the STAR Program was successfully implemented for the W3 Cycle 15 reload core.

Where applicable, Table 1 also provides a comparison of the difference between the measured and calculated values, and the core design method uncertainties. As illustrated, the differences were all within the core design method uncertainties.

STAR Applicability Requirements Table 3-4, "STAR Program Applicability Requirements" of Reference 5, lists the applicability requirements for the use of the STAR program. The STAR applicability requirements provide compensatory measures that ensure the core can be operated as designed when used in conjunction with the STAR Program Tests outlined in Table 3-3 of the topical. The STAR applicability requirements involve the following areas:

" Core Design

" Fabrication

  • Refueling
  • Startup Testing
  • CEA Lifetime Conformance with the STAR applicability requirements is documented in accordance with plant processes and procedures. The information below is formatted to match Table 3-4 of Reference 5.

to W3F1-2007-0044 NON-PROPRIETARY Page 2 of 13

  • Core Design Requirement 1 W3 Cycle 15 used Westinghouse's ANC/PARAGON as the Design Method. Through benchmarking, the ANC/PARAGON [ Pa, - were confirmed to be applicable to the Zirconium Diboride (ZrB2)

IFBA fuel used for the set of parameters listed under Core Design Requirement 1. The [

Pa, c for ANC/PARAGON was also established. Therefore based on this, STAR Core Design Applicability Requirement 1 is met for Cycle 15.

Requirement 2 This requirement involves the [

a, c The W3 Physics Assessment Checklist (PAC) methodology used for Cycle 15 defines the methods used to calculate physics parameters including the application of biases and uncertainties input to downstream analysis. The PAC methodology for select PAC parameters was implemented for Cycle 15 using the Automated Procedure (AP) for confirming the PAC assessment checklist. Included was the application of biases and uncertainties described above. Also, included in the PAC assessment was confirmation that the latest biases and uncertainties were applied to all applicable parameters.

Therefore, the [

Pa, c the ones identified for Requirement 1 since the PAC assessment verified that limits for specific physics parameters are not violated.

Therefore, STAR Core Design Applicability Requirement 2 is met for Cycle 15.

Requirement 3 This requirement is to [

Pa, c Based on review of the benchmarking information that went into the core design uncertainties, acceptance criteria were developed for each of the above parameters based on the STAR topical. Described below are the Cycle 15 values and the corresponding acceptance criteria based on the benchmarking.

[

I a,c to W3F1-2007-0044 NON-PROPRIETARY Page 3 of 13 r, I

a, c Therefore, STAR Core Design Applicability Requirement 3 is met for Cycle 15.

Requirement 4 The confirmation that the Cycle 15 core design is [

.a, c The STAR topical provides [

Pa c The Alternate Core Design Method used is the CASMO/SIMULATE code. Both core design methods were used to calculate the [

a, c These evaluations were performed for both Cycle 15 where no CEA worth measurements or MTC surveillance would be performed and for Cycle 14 where CEA worth measurements and MTC surveillance were performed. The CASMO/SIMULATE code was benchmarked in accordance with the Core Design Applicability Requirement 3.

Table 2 provides the results from the two codes. The results are consistent between the two codes and are within 42% of the [ I.a, c The differences are therefore within the acceptance criterion of one-half (50%) of the [ ,ac Therefore, STAR Core Design Applicability Requirement 4 is met for Cycle 15.

Based upon the discussion above, the requirements for the Core Design area, listed in Table 3-4 of Reference 5 have been met for Cycle 15.

to W3F1-2007-0044 NON-PROPRIETARY Page 4 of 13 Fabrication Requirement 1 A review of the Product Certification certificates shows the fresh Cycle 15 fuel assemblies were built to a particular fuel assembly drawing and Bill of Materials. The Bill of Materials shows that the assemblies were built from an engineering procedure for a particular pattern.

The fuel assembly drawing describes the orientation of the upper end fittings and serial numbers.

A review of these documents taken together shows that the fresh Batch Y fuel assemblies for W3 Cycle 15 were manufactured in accordance with the core design assumptions.

Reload Assemblies were previously verified in a similar manner as described above and remain valid for Cycle 15.

Therefore, STAR Fabrication Applicability Requirement 1 is met for Cycle 15.

Requirement 2 For this requirement the licensee shall [

c ca No new CEAs were manufactured for use in Cycle 15. Therefore, STAR Fabrication Applicability Requirement 2 is not applicable to Cycle 15.

Based upon the discussions above, the requirements for the Fabrication area listed in Table 3-4 of Reference 5 has been met for Cycle 15.

Refueling Requirement 1 The first refueling requirement requires [

Ia, C W3 procedures require the core loading to be verified immediately following fuel movement. Core verification was performed by visually inspecting the as-loaded core. Two fuel handling engineers independently evaluated the serial number of each fuel assembly to Pa, c were in accordance with the Cycle 15 core design. Additionally, verification was performed that checked a full length CEA location did contain one CEA. A recording of this evolution was also independently confirmed by the Reactor Engineering Superintendent and Quality Assurance personnel.

Waterford 3 does not use any neutron sources; therefore, the [ cadoes not C

need to be verified.

to W3F1-2007-0044 NON-PROPRIETARY Page 5 of 13 Through the above steps, the Cycle 15 core was verified to be loaded as designed. Therefore, STAR Refueling Applicability 1 is met for Cycle 15.

Requirement 2 W3 procedures require documentation of the [ cca, of each extension shaft both before and after it is coupled. These attachments also require a second person verification of these steps.

The procedures also require that the Refueling Team Supervision has confirmed that CEA coupling was verified using [ ]aC Waterford procedures also require that CEA Drop Times be measured prior to initial criticality at the beginning of each fuel cycle. Comparison of the measured drop time characteristics with previous cycles demonstrated similar behavior and provided assurance that the CEAs were coupled to the extension shafts.

Therefore, STAR Refueling Applicability Requirement 2 is met for Cycle 15.

W3 procedures were completed successfully during RF14 and verified; therefore the requirements of Table 3-4 of Reference 5 for the Refueling area were met.

Startup Testing

[

ca c does not meet the acceptance criteria, then proceed with low power physics testing using the traditional techniques. This includes the Isothermal Temperature Coefficient (ITC) test, CEA worth measurement and the MTC surveillance test being performed.

As shown in Table 1, [  ;]a, c therefore, these tests were not performed.

Based on the above-the requirements for Startup Testing listed in Table 3-4 of Reference 5 are met.

  • CEA Lifetime Table 3-4 of Reference 5 requires [

,ac None of the W3 CEAs exceeded any established limits, as discussed below.

to W3F1-2007-0044 NON-PROPRIETARY Page 6 of 13 A full batch of CEAs operated in the W3 core from Cycle 1 through Cycle 9 and were replaced during RF9, accumulating a total residence time of 11.10 EFPY. No lifetime issues were detected with any of the CEAs, and all of these CEAs fully performed their design function during this timeframe. The current batch of CEAs in the core has operated successfully from Cycle 10 through Cycle 14.

Assuming a limiting cycle length of 485 EFPD for Cycle 15, the total EFPY for CEAs at the end of Cycle 15 is 8.65 EFPY. A multiplier was added to Cycles 12 and greater to account for power uprate (ensuring that the fluxes are being compared appropriately to pre-power uprate powers/fluxes). Thus, the CEA exposure in the reactor core at the end of Cycle 15 will be significantly less than the W3 operating experience of 11.10 EFPY, for which there is confidence in the assumed behavior of the CEA materials.

Based on CEALL code results, Irradiation Assisted Stress Corrosion Cracking (IASCC) inspection thresholds are not exceeded and no CEALL code limits are exceeded.

W3 repositions the All Rods Out position of all CEAs in the core approximately every 90 days to minimize CEA wear with the CEA guide tube. In addition, W3 shuffles Group 6 and Group P to reduce fluence.

Uncertainties are conservatively applied in the CEA lifetime determination.

Based on both operational experience and calculated fluences of the W3 CEAs, there is confidence in the assumed behavior of the CEA materials throughout Cycle 15 operations.

Based on the above discussions, [

Pa, c The lifetime of the CEAs used in the W3 Cycle 15 core fully meets the applicability requirements listed in Table 3-4 of Reference 5.

Conclusions The above discussions demonstrate that the NRC's conditions and limitations listed in Reference 5 have been successfully met for the startup of W3 following RF14.

References 1 WCAP-1 1596-P-A, "Qualification of the PHOENIX-P / ANC Nuclear Design System for Pressurized Water Reactor Cores", June 1988 2 WCAP-1 0965-P-A, "ANC: A Westinghouse Advanced Nodal Computer Code", September 1986 3 WCAP-1 0965-P-A, Addendum 1, "ANC: A Westinghouse Advanced Nodal Computer Code:

Enhancements to ANC Rod Power Recovery", April 1989 4 WCAP-1 6045-P-A, "Qualification of the Two-Dimensional Transport Code PARAGON", August 2004 5 WCAP-1 6011-P-A, "Startup Test Activity Reduction Program", Revision 0, February 2005 to W3F1-2007-0044 NON-PROPRIETARY Page 7 of 13 Table 1 W3 Cycle 15 STAR Program Test Results TEST1 POWER MEASURED CALCULATED DIFFERENCE TEST CRITERIA UNCERTAINTY VALUE VALUE Maximum Individual CEA Drop Time Shutdown drop time is 2.90 NA NA IndividualNA seconds NA<*3.2 seconds2 CEA Drop Times were measured and all CEAs inserted at or below 2.90 seconds.

CEA Drop Time Comparison of the drop time characteristics Max Difference CEAaDristics Shutdown with previous cycles demonstrated the N/A NA similar behavior and provided assurance that the CEAs were coupled to the extension shafts.

[ [

CBC HZP 1602 ppm 1544 ppm 436 pcm or 58 ppm ]a~c Ja'c MTC Alternate HZP 2.756 E-4Ak/k/°F -2.0 E-4Ak/k/°F NA 0.5 E-4 Ak/k/OF > x N/A Surveillance > -3.9 E-4 Ak/k/°F Power of each Power in each Max difference from operable detector Incore Flux

-25% operable detector NA symmetric group within +/- 10% of the NA Symmetry location average = 3.4% average power in its symmetric group3 1 Table 3-3 of the STAR topical report (Reference 1) provides descriptions of the tests.

2Technical Specification limit 3 Detector 21, 20, and 36 were in asymmetrically loaded locations and meet vendor power predictions.

to W3F1-2007-0044 NON-PROPRIETARY Page 8 of 13 Table 1 W3 Cycle 15 STAR Program Test Results (Continued)

TEST1 MEASURED CALCULATED DIFFERENCE TEST CRITERIA UNCERTAINTY VALUE VALUE RMS Errors <5%, F) =4.94 ARPD within-< 15% %difference Incore Power (RPD <0.9), Fr = 3.44 %

Distribution 68% See Table 3 ARPD within - 10% difference (RPD -- 0.9), = 5.25%

Fxy, Fr, Fz, Fq difference within +/-10%

ITC -100% -1.1152 E-4Ak/k/°F - 0.894 E-4Ak/k/°F 0.221 E-4Ak/k/°F + 0.5 E-4Ak/k/°F [ ]ac

< 0.0 E-4Ak/k/°F 2 MTC Surveillance HFP -0.996 E-4Ak/k/°F NA NA and within COLR NA limits RMS Errors < 5%, Fxy= 4.94 ARPD within < 15% %difference (RPD < 0.9), Fr = 3.44 %

Incore Power HFP. See Table 4 ARPD within < 10% difference (RPD > 0.9), Fq = 5.25 %

Fxy, Fr, Fz Fq difference within +/-10%

ACBC HZP-HFP HFP 555.5 ppm 548 ppm 7.5 ppm +/- 50 ppm NA 1Table 3-3 of the STAR topical report (Reference 1) provides descriptions of the tests.

2Technical Specification limit 3 Detector 21, 20, and 36 were in asymmetrically loaded locations and meet vendor power predictions.

to W3F1 -2007-0044 NON-PROPRIETARY Page 9 of 13 Table 2

-I -f I

-I I I i i -i i

+ I I -1 I I I I I la, c I

W3F1-2007-0044 Page 10 of 13 Table 3 - 68% Power get68.o GGGGGGGGGG EEEEEEEEEE TTTrrTTTTTTT AAAA RRRRRRRRRPPPPPPPPP G0GGGGGGG0 EEEEEEEELE TTAArTTTTT AAAA RRRRRRRRRR PPPPPFPPPP GGG EEE TT" AAA AAA RRR RRRPPP PP GGG GGGGGEEEEEE -TT AAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRR PPPPPPPPPP GGG GGGGGEEEEEE TTT AAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRPPPPPPPPP GGG GGG LEE TTT AAA AAA RRRRRR PPP GGGGGGGGGG EEEEEEEEEE T AAA AAA RRR RRR PPP GGGGGGGGGG EEEEEEEEEE MTT AAA AAA RRR RRR PPP (FPA)

A PROGRAM TO EXTRACT DATAFROMCECORSUMM'ARY FILES FORCOMPARISON OF AXIAL ANDRADIAL POWERDISTRIBUTIONS.

GETRNP01 - GETARP FOR NT REVISION 1 MEASURED DATAEXTRACTED FROM:w2780ka.sOl PREDICTED DATAEXTRACTED FROM:c15p68 RELATIVE RADIALPOWER DISTRIBUTION COMPARISON

...-........ --------+-------------+-----+

PREDICTED ; .271; .521; .467; .327; (MEAS.-PREDICTED)

MEASURED ; .279; .535; .471; ,.330;  % DIFFERENCE ----- X 100.0

% DIFFER  ; 2.86; 2.66; .90; .94; PREDICTED

.+..+ 4- --- +-----------------------+

.304; .513; .668; 1.009; 1.076; 1.012; .680; .518; .307;

.294; .503; .635; 1.003; 1.081; 1.001; .639; .508; .295;

-3.39; -1.87; -4.97; -. 62; .49; -1.23; -6.03; -1.91; -3.87;

+- + +-+-+

---------- +-----+

.406; .996; 1.154; 1.197; 1.219; 1.201; 1.223; 1.205; 1.159; .997; .402;
.411; .973; 1.132; 1.180; 1.215; 1.192; 1.221; 1.195; 1.146; .983; .408; 1.21; -2.29; -1.88; -1.40; -. 32; -. 75; -. 20; -. 84; -1.14; -1.42; 1.61;

4------+-...+--..+..-4-- . +

.402; 1.OSO; 1.183; 1.182; 1.244; 1.175; 1.266; 1.178; 1.252; 1.185; 1.184; 1.050; .406;

.375; 1.022; 1.155; 1.162; 1.219; 1.173; 1.282; 1.180; 1.250; 1.178; 1.173; 1.024; .335;

-6.65; -2.64; -2.39; -1.65; -2.02; -. 15; 1.27; .19; -. 14; -. 57; -. 94; -2.52;-12.58;

+-. ... ÷....÷ ... +.... ... +.... ... ÷.... .... +.... +-----

.... +.... ------.

....------------------ +

.307; .997; 1.184; 1.155; 1.261; 1.229; 1.259; 1.158; 1.262; 1.233; 1.263; 1.155; 1.183; .996; .304;

.322; .979; 1.165; 1.136; 1.260; 1.219; 1.273; 1.167; 1.285; 1.243; 1.281; 1.152; 1.174; .979; .317; 5.05; -1.78; -1.60; -1.65; -. 04; -. 78; 1.13; .75; 1.83; .83; 1.41; -. 24; -. 80; -1.75; 4.26;

-......+...... ...... + .......... +.....+....+....+ --......... --4.4+4.+....-

+...............+.--- +

.518; 1.159; 1.185; 1.263; 1.140; 1.176; 1.146; 1.156; 1.146; 1.176; 1.140; 1.261; 1.182; 1.154; .513;

.523; 1.149; 1.171; 1.265; 1.129; 1.178; 1.144; 1.166; 1.155; 1.201; 1.149; 1.286; 1.184; 1.162; .526;

.88; -. 89; -1.18; .18; -. 97; .19; -. 20; .86; .78; 2.09; .76; 1.98; .19; .71; 2.53;

÷...... - +-... 4 +---4

--.... --...--... +....+.... 4- ... 4--------

.... +....+ ... ...-------- .---.... +

.680; 1.205; 1.252; 1.233; 1.176; 1.064; 1.124; 1.046; 1.123; 1.064; 1.176; 1.229; 1.244; 1.197; .668;

+------ ; .672; 1.202; 1.242; 1.223; 1.188; 1.055; 1.140; 1.045; 1.152; 1.076; 1.208; 1.241; 1.250; 1.214; .673; -------

.327; -1.12; -. 27; -. 81; -. 85; 1.04; -. 89; 1.44; -. 07; 2.54; 1.10; 2.71; .98; .49; 1.41; .81; .271;

  • .308+-----------......----.....- +...-----------.--.. --...-- - - - ..-- - - +-- ...-- - - - -- -..--...--..--...---

--- - -.. +- .261;

-5.87; 1.012; 1.223; 1.178; 1.262; 1.146; 1.123; 1.159; 1.026; 1.159; 1.124; 1.146; 1.259; 1.175; 1.219; 1.009; -3.72;

; .995; 1.218; 1.166; 1.266; 1.146; 1.132; 1.169; 1.016; 1.177; 1.151; 1.159; 1.272; 1.178; 1.235; 1.011; ------+

.467; -1.68; -. 44; -. 99; .31; .03; 1.80; .86; -. 97; 1.59; 2.41; 1.14; 1.00; .22; 1.29; .19; .521;

.463+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------+- +- + .528;

-. 76; 1 076; 1.201; 1.266; 1.158; 1.156; 1.046; 1.026; .879; 1.026; 1.046; 1.156; 1.158; 1.266; 1.201; 1.076; 1.39;

+------ ; 1:060; 1.183; 1.268; 1.150; 1.176; 1.056; 1.052; .933; 1.070; 1.066; 1.190; 1.166; 1.285; 1.199; 1.077; -------

.521; -1.49; -1.51; .19; -. 65; 1.72; .95; 2.52; 6.17; 4.33; 1.94; 2.97; .72; 1.53; -. 17; .12; .467;

.519 ---------------------------------- +-------------------------------------------------------------------- --+ .470;

-. 42; 1.009; 1.219; 1.175; 1.259; 1.146; 1.124; 1.159; 1.026; 1.159; 1.123; 1.146; 1.262; 1.178; 1.223; 1.012; .70; 271'---- .990; 1.209; 1.163; 1.256; 1.147; 1.151; 1.191; 1.069; 1.199; 1.146; 1.164; 1.280; 1,182; 1.239; 1.010; ------+

.271; -1.84; -. 82; -1.01; -. 23; .09; 2.41; 2.75; 4.22; 3.45; 2.09; 1.54; 1.46; .36; 1.33; -. 15; .327;

.249+ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +---------+ .314;

-7.98; .668; 1.197; 1.244; 1.229; 1.176; 1.064; 1.123; 1.046; 1.124; 1.064; 1.176; 1.233; 1.252; 1.205; .680; -4.12;

. .661; 1.198; 1.240; 1.225; 1.198; 1.076; 1.161; 1.066; 1.161; 1.072; 1.206; 1.242; 1.253; 1.212; .679; ------ +

-1.09; .09; -. 34; -. 31; 1.89; 1.15; 3.36; 1.95; 3.32; .79; 2.55; .72; .07; .58; -. 15;

÷ ... -...-- .... +- -... ----------------

...- +....+....

4-...-4-..4---..-------.+- ... .... +....+ ... - -+

.513; 1.154; 1.182; 1.261; 1.140; 1.176; 1.146; 1.156; 1.146; 1.176; 1.140; 1.263; 1.185; 1.159; .518;

.520; 1.155; 1.175; 1.273; 1.139; 1.193; 1.154; 1.172; 1.158; 1.192; 1.142; 1.267; 1.172; 1.146; .523; 1.32; .13; -. 56; .95; -. 08; 1.43; .67; 1.42; 1.01; 1.35; .20; .33; -1.08; -1.15; .99;

÷.. .-4-. ..- 4-4-----.... -+....-+....4 -....- -..- ÷....--....- 4....-.....-- .... .... .... ..--- - .+-.. .+

  • .304; .996; 1.183; 1.155; 1.263; 1.233; 1.262; 1.158; 1.259; 1.229; 1.261; 1.155; 1.184; .997; .307;
  • .317; .986; 1.175; 1.146; 1.271; 1.227; 1.275; 1.160; 1.278; 1.230; 1.269; 1.139; 1.167; .979; .320; 4.32; -1.01; -. 66; -. 80; .60; -. 45; 1.04; .19; 1.49; .12; .60; -1.41; -1.42; -1.78; 4.23; S....+ .. .. 4- ÷ .... +4 ....- +.... 4 - +....-

4 -+....- +....

- - 4 ....- . -... 4 ....- 4 ....---------

- 4 - 4 +...-

.406; 1.050; 1.184; 1.185; 1.252; 1.178; 1.266; 1.175; 1.244; 1.182; 1.183; 1.050; .402;

.383; 1.037; 1.186; 1.173; 1.224; 1.167; 1.280; 1.172; 1.227; 1.166; 1.165; 1.026; .378;

-5.60; -1.20; .14; -1.05; -2.25; -. 92; 1.11; -. 23; -1.40; -1.36; -1.54; -2.24; -5.96;

- ------. ------. 4 ------.

- --.--.....------ + --..........--.

-...- +-. .+..- . .+..-4--

.402; .997; 1.159; 1.205; 1.223; 1.201; 1.219; 1.197; 1.154; .996; .406;

.408; .986; 1.143; 1.187; 1.214; 1.185; 1.213; 1.180; 1.132; .973; .408; 1.49; -1.08; -1.36; -1.45; -. 71; -1.31; -. 51; -1.40; -1.93; -2.35; .55;

+-------------------------------------------------

.307; .518; .680; 1.012; 1.076; 1.009; .668; .513; .304;

.296; .510; .648; 1.OOS; 1.088; 1.002; .630; .499; .285;

-3.64; -1.63; -4.70; -. 71; 1.08; -. 69; -5.64; -2.65; -6.27;

...... +..-.. +................ +............-----+- - - 4-4..

+...

.327; .467; .S21; .271;

.334; .474; .533; .277; 2.00; 1.54; 2.31; 2.10;

÷------..-4----------+------.

W3F1-2007-0044 Page 11 of 13 Table 3 - 68% Power Distribution (cont) get68. o RELATIVE AXIAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPARISON NODE PREDICTED MEAS.  % DIFFERENCE 1 .5140 .5290 2.9132 2 .6340 .6139 -3.1659 3 .7370 .6906 -6.2994 4 .7840 .7585 -3.2582 5 .8260 .8174 -1.0372 6 .8590 .8677 1.0084 7 .8850 .9096 2.7768 8 .9060 .9438 4.1754 9 .9240 .9713 5.1149 10 .9390 .9928 5.7328 11 .9510 1.0096 6.1571 12 .9630 1.0224 6.1731 13 .9740 1.0325 '6.0040 14 .9840 1.0405 5.7432 15 .9940 1.0473 5.3603 16 1.0030 1.0534 5.0206 17 1.0120 1.0591 4.6586 18 1.0210 1.0649 4.2982 19 1.0290 1.0707 4.0491 20 1.0370 1.0764 3.8039 21 1.0450 1.0821 3.5505 22 1.0530 1.0874 3.2709 23 1.0620 1.0923 2.8495 24 1.0700 1.0964 2.4644 25 1.0810 1.0996 1.7228 26 1.0930 1.1020 .8189 27 1.1060 1.1034 -. 2384 28 1.1150 1.1040 -. 9906 29 1.1220 1.1039 -1.6135 30 1.1270 1.1034 -2.0927 31 1.1310 1.1028 -2.4966 32 1.1340 1.1022 -2.8057 33 1.1350 1.1019 -2.9191 34 1.1360 1.1019 -2.9996 35 1.1360 1.1023 -2.9643 36 1.1350 1.1029 -2.8291 37 1.1320 1.1033 -2.5397 38 1.1290 1.1029 -2.3161 39 1.1240 1.1009 -2.0512 40 1.1180 1.0966 -1.9136 41 1.1090 1.0888 -1.8239 42 1.0970 1.0763 -1.8889 43 1.0820 1.0579 -2.2257 44 1.0620 1.0325 -2.7781 45 1.0360 .9989 -3.5802 46 1.0030 .9562 -4.6659 47 .9590 .9036 -5.7733 48 .9030 .8407 -6.8948 49 .8380 .7674 -8.4284 50 .7170 .6837 -4.6417 51 .5800 .5903 1.7837 PEAKING PARAMETER COMPARISON PARAMETER MEAS. PREDICTED % DIFFERENCE FXY 1.4729 1.3990 5.2857 %

FR 1.3932 1.3820 .8135 %

FZ 1.1040 1.1350 -2.7352 %

FQ 1.5528 1.5630 -. 6519 %

CALCULATED RMS VALUES RADIAL = 1.6602 AXIAL = 3.7177 MEASURED ASI = -. 0274 PREDICTED ASI = -. 0570 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA REPORT MEASURED FXY WAS WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 10.000 % OF THE PREDICTED VALUE.

MEASURED FR WAS WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 10.000 % OF THE PREDICTED VALUE.

MEASURED FZ WAS WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 10.000 % OF THE PREDICTED VALUE.

MEASURED FQ WAS WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 10.000 % OF THE PREDICTED VALUE.

RMS ERROR ON AXIAL DISTRIBUTION WAS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 5.000 %.

RMS ERROR ON RADIAL DISTRIBUTION WAS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 5.000 %.

ALL PREDICTED RADIAL POWERS LESS THAN 0.9 WERE WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 15.000 % OF MEASURED.

ALL PREDICTED RADIAL POWERS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 0.9 WERE WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 10.000 % OF MEASURED.

      • ALL ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA WERE MET ***

Attachment 1 W3F1-2007-0044 Page 12 of 13 Table 4 - 100% Power Distribution GETIOO.OUT GGGGGGGGGG EEEEEEEEEE TTTTTTTTTTT AAAA RRRRRRRRR PPPPPPPPP GGGGGGGGGG EEEEEEEEEE T-TTTTTTTT AAAAAA RRRRRRRRRR PPPPPPPPPP GGG EEE TTT AAA AAA RRR RRR PPP PPP GGG GGGGG EEEEEE TTT AAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRR PPPPPPPPPP GGG GGGGG EEEEEE TTT AAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRR PPPPPPPPP GGG GGG EEE TTT AAA AAA RRR RRR PPP GGGGGGGGGG EEEEEEEEEE TTT AAA AAA RRR RRR PPP GGGGGGGGGG EEEEEEEEEE TTT AAA AAA RRR RRR PPP (FPA)

A PROGRAM TO EXTRACT DATA FROM CECOR

SUMMARY

FILES FOR COMPARISON OF AXIAL AND RADIAL POWER DISTRIBUTIONS.

GETRNP01 - GETARP FOR NT REVISION 1 MEASURED DATA EXTRACTED FROM: W278405.S02 PREDICTED DATA EXTRACTED FROM: C15P100 RELATIVE RADIAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPARISON

"------------ ------------------ ++---+--

PREDICTED .279; .530; .476; .335; (MEAS.-PREDICTED)

MEASURED .278;. .531; .468; .329;  % DIFFERENCE =........--------- X 100.0

% DIFFER -. 45; .14; -1.75; -1.84; PREDICTED

+ +-+-+

.-------------- -----------------------------------.------- +--- -+

.311; .520; .675; 1.011; 1.076; 1.014; .687; .525; .314;

.297; .503; .637; 1.001; 1.073; .998; .641; .508; .298;

-4.52; -3.31; -5.63; -1.03; -. 28; -1.55; -6.77; -3.31; -5.10;

...... ...... ...... ...... + -...... + -...... +...- .. + ......- +......- + ...... ......

.412; .997; 1.149; 1.191; 1.212; 1.193; 1.216; 1.198; 1.154; .998; .409;

.408; .967; 1.128; 1.179; 1.216; 1.187; 1.221; 1.194; 1.143; .981; .406;

-1.06; -3.01; -1.81; -. 97; .31; -. 51; .40; -. 36; -. 92; -1.75; -. 66;

-...... +..-...+......- +-......+......-+....-..+......-+......-+......-+...-.+..-.+..-.+..-.+

.409; 1.049; 1.177; 1.174; 1.235; 1.169; 1.259; 1.172; 1.242; 1.176; 1.177; 1.049; .412;

.379; 1.017; 1.144; 1.153; 1.210; 1.170; 1.285; 1.176; 1.239; 1.171; 1.172; 1.020; .355;

-7.30; -3.08; -2.83; -1.78; -2.04; .05; 2.03; .32; -. 26; -. 44; -. 46; -2.77;-13.81;

+ +-++ -...- + -- + -- + -- +- ------. + ---- - +-+-+- + -- -+ - +

.314; .998; 1.177; 1.149; 1.254; 1.223; 1.254; 1,156; 1.256; 1.226; 1.255; 1.149; 1.177; .997; .311;

.320; .974; 1.162; 1.129; 1.261; 1.217; 1.280; 1.170; 1.290; 1.239; 1.280; 1.146; 1.170; .970; .313;

1.88; -2.36; -1.26; -1.74; .53; -. 45; 2.05; 1.19; 2.74; 1.07; 2.03; -. 26; -. 63; -2.67; .80;

...... +......-+..-....+......-+......-+....- -... +....-..+.....-.+.....-.+.....-.+.....-.+...-.+..-.+..-.+

.525; 1.154; 1.176; 1.255; 1.137; 1.176; 1.147; 1.159; 1.147; 1.176; 1.137; 1.254; 1.174; 1.149; .520;

.519; 1.140; 1.163; 1.265; 1.130; 1.189; 1.152; 1.181; 1.162; 1.208; 1.147; 1.281; 1.172; 1.148; .S20;

-1.22; -1.24; -1.12; .81; -. 57; 1.13; .47; 1.92; 1.30; 2.70; .87; 2.15; -. 13; -. 05; .01;

+-......+..-....+.....-.+.....-.+............-+-.....+..-+..-.+..-.+-- .... +...-...+......- +..........-..

.687; 1.198; 1.242; 1.226; 1.176; 1.069; 1.131; 1.055; 1.131; 1.069; 1.176; 1.223; 1.235; 1.191; .675;

+......  ; .671; 1.198; 1.235; 1.221; 1.199; 1.065; 1.158; 1.059; 1.167; 1.083; 1.215; 1.235; 1.239; 1,206; .671;, .... +

.335; -2.26; .01; -. 58; -. 40; 1.96; -. 35; 2.34; .34; 3.20; 1.32; 3.32; 1.00; .32; 1.28; -. 65; .279;

. 314+---------+------ +-......-+-----+-+--+--+-+-+--+ - - - -- ---- +--- ---- + .268

-6.16; 1.014; 1.216; 1.172; 1.256; 1.147; 1.131; 1.170; 1.040; 1.170; 1.131; 1.147; 1.254; 1.169; 1.212; 1.011; -4.10

.997; 1.214; 1.162; 1.273; 1.156; 1.153; 1.184; 1.038; 1.190; 1.168; 1.165; 1.274; 1.170; 1.228; 1.011 ...... +

.4-76; -1.63; -. 16; -. 81; 1.33; .75; 1.98; 1.17; -. 23; 1.74; 3.27; 1.55; 1.61; .09; 1.31; -. 03; .530;

.465-+-. --------------- +-......-+-......+..-.-+..-- .+..-.+..-.+..-.-+..-.-+..- .+--+----+-....----+----- + .528;

-2.38; 1.076; 1.193; 1.259; 1.156; 1.159; 1.055; 1.040; .899; 1.040; 1.055; 1.159; 1.156; 1.259; 1.193; 1.076; -. 36;

 ; 1.063; 1.179; 1.271; 1.154; 1.190; 1.067; 1.060; .941; 1.078; 1.076; 1.202; 1.167; 1.285; 1.191; 1.077; +

.530; -1.20; -1.19; .97; -. 20; 2.65; 1.17; 1.91; 4.68; 3.61; 1.99; 3.70; .91; 2.03; -A16; .10; .476;

.520+---------------------------------------- ---------..- -- ------------ + .+ -. + -. +-. .+.-.+- -- +-.---... .+ .470;

-1.84; 1.011; 1.212; 1.169; 1.254; 1.147; 1.131; 1.170; 1.040; 1.170; 1.131; 1.147; 1.256; 1.172; 1.216; 1.014; -1.27;

+ 279..; .993; 1.206; 1.159; 1.262; 1.155; 1.170; 1.200; 1.078; 1.208; 1.166; 1.171; 1.285; 1.175; 1.231; 1.010; +

.279; -1.75; -. 47; -. 83; .66; .73; 3.45; 2.60; 3.68; 3.29; 3.14; 2.08; 2.28; .25; 1.27; -. 43; .335;

.256+-...... +.......----------------------------------------- ----......- ....--- ....--- ....----- +-.---- +------ + .319;

-8.25; .675; 1.191; 1.235; 1.223; 1.176; 1.069; 1.131; 1.055; 1.131; 1.069; 1.176; 1.226; 1.242; 1.198; .687; 4.83;

....... .660; 1.195; 1.233; 1.223; 1.208; 1.08S; 1.174; 1.075; 1.175; 1.081; 1.214; 1.238; 1.243; 1.205; .676; +

-2.18; .37; -. 15; .04; 2.71; 1.47; 3.84; 1.87; 3.89; 1.11; 3.27; .95; .05; .58; -1.60;

+-......+...-. +......-+......-+......-+......-+......-+........................-----......-+-......+..-...

.520; 1.149; 1.174; 1.254; 1.137; 1.176; 1.147; 1.159; 1.147; 1.176; 1.137; 1.255; 1.176; 1.154; .525;

.516; 1.148; 1.168; 1.273; 1.140; 1.202; 1.160; 1.186; 1.164; 1.201; 1.142; 1.265; 1.161; 1.134; .518;

-. 70; -. 08;. -. 51; 1.53; .24; 2.19; 1.12; 2.29; 1.45; 2.14; .41; .78; -1.25; -1.76; -1.39;

+-....+.- -+.- . + .....-. + ..... +..... +..... .... .... -

.... - -..... -...--+.....+.....--------- +...- .. +

.311; .997; 1.177; 1.149; 1.255; 1.226; 1.256; 1.156; 1.254; 1.223; 1.254; 1.149; 1.177; .998; .314;
.315; .982; 1.173; 1.140; 1.271; 1.224; 1.279; 1.161; 1.281; 1.226; 1.266; 1.130; 1.162; .972; .317;
1.30; -1.50; -. 32; -. 82; 1.24; -. 14; 1.86; .40; 2.18; .25; .98; -1.69; -1.31; -2.60; .85;

+- ...... +. ..-. + .....-. + ... .. .... . .... . .... .... - -. -.... -----...... . .... .. ... .. ... ... ..--++- ...... +

.412; 1.049; 1.177; 1.176; 1.242; 1.172; 1.259; 1.169; 1.235; 1.174; 1.177; 1.049; .409;

.387; 1.033; 1.176; 1.164; 1.215; 1.161; 1.277; 1.166; 1.215; 1.154; 1.151; 1.019; .381;

-6.04; -1.55; -. 07; -1.06; -2.18; -. 90; 1.41; -. 29; -1.62; -1.68; -2.18; -2.90; -6.89;

+ ... - ...- - ... -...- ... +-

+.-- + ..... .... ..... + .....----..-- +..... ..... +..-- +.-....+

.409; .998; 1.154; 1.198; 1.216; 1.193; 1.212; 1.191; 1.149; .997; .412;

.405; .981; 1.139; 1.186; 1.213; 1.178; 1.211; 1.177; 1.126; .96S; .404;

-. 93; -1.71; -1.27; -1.00; -. 21; -1.27; -. 08; -1.15; -2.03; -3.24; -1.89;

+-....+.- ... +.- .-..... +.....-.+......- +-......+-......+.........----+- ...... +

.314; .525; .687; 1.014; 1.076; 1.011; .675; .520; .311;

.300; .509; .649; 1.002; 1.079; .999; .632; .498; .288;

-4.54; -3.08; -5.52; -1.20; .27; -1.20; -6.40; -4.20; -7.37;

+--------+--------+------+-......-+.-...-+..-.+..--- +..-.-+-.-.+

.335; .476; .530; .279;

.332; .470; .529; .276;

-. 88; -1.16; -. 25; -1.25;

+-------.+------+-....+..-..+

W3F1-2007-0044 Page 13 of 13 Table 4 - 100% Power Distribution (cont)

GET10O.OUT RELATIVE AXIAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPARISON NODE PREDICTED MEAS.  % DIFFERENCE 1 .5830 .5447 -6.5653 2 .7150 .6333 -11.4301 3 .8290 .7131 -13.9858 4 .8780 .7836 -10.7554 5 .9210 .8446 -8.2922 6 .9S40 .8964 -6.0391 7 .9790 .9393 -4.0575 8 .9990 .9740 1.0014 -2.5041 9 1.0140 -1.2443 10 1.0260 1.0225 -. 3420 11 1.0360 1.0384 .2305 12 1.0440 1.0502 .5909 13 1.0510 1.0589 .7495 14 1.0570 1.0655 .7999 15 1.0620 1.0707 .8198 16 1.0670 1.0753 .7750 17 1.0710 1.0796 .8031 18 1.0740 1.0840 .9296 19 1.0780 1.0885 .9767 20 1.0800 1.0932 1.2229 21 1.0830 1.0979 1.3739 22 1.0850 1.1023 1.5978 23 1.0870 1.1063 1.7782 24 1.0890 1.1096 1.8935 25 1.0930 1.1120 1.7392 26 1.0980 1.1134 1.3988 27 1.1030 1.1136 .9623 28 1.1050 1.1128 .7066 29 1.1040 1.1111 .6392 30 1.1030 1.108S .5021 31 1.1000 1. 05S .4976 32 1.0960 1.1021 .5558 33 1.0910 1.0986 .6955 34 1.0850 1.0951 .9299 35 1.0790 1.0916 1.1691 36 1.0710 1.0880 1.5913 37 1.06.30 1.0841 1.9840 38 1.0540 1.0793 2 .4000 39 1.0430 1.0730 2.8785 40 1.0320 1.0645 3.1463 41 1.0180 1.0527 3.4084 42 1.0020 1.0367 3.4601 43 .9830 1.0153 3.2859 44 .9600 .9875 2.8662 45 .9330 .9523 2.0695 46 .8990 .9088 1. 0914 47 .8570 .8563 -. 0759 48 .8040 .7945 -1.1820 49 .7460 .7231 -3.0676 So .6440 .6424 -. 2503 51 .5280 .5528 4.7026 PEAKING PARAMETER COMPARISON PARAMETER MEAS. PREDICTED  % DIFFERENCE FXY 1.4646 1.3900 5.3644 %

FR 1.3845 1.3710 .9844 %

FZ 1.1136 1.1030 .9623 %

FQ 1.5624 1.5090 3.5380  %

CALCULATED RMS VALUES RADIAL = 1.9221 AXIAL = 3.2723 MEASURED ASI = -. 0052 PREDICTED ASI = .0089 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA REPORT MEASURED FXY WAS WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 10.000 % OF THE PREDICTED VALUE.

MEASURED FR WAS WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 10.000  % OF THE PREDICTED VALUE.

MEASURED FZ WAS WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 10.000  % OF THE PREDICTED VALUE.

MEASURED FQ WAS WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 10.000 % OF THE PREDICTED VALUE.

  • RMS ERROR ON AXIAL DISTRIBUTION WAS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 5.000 %.

RMS ERROR ON RADIAL DISTRIBUTION WAS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 5.000 %.

  • ALL PREDICTED RADIAL POWERS LESS THAN 0.9 WERE WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 15.000  % OF MEASURED.

ALL PREDICTED RADIAL POWERS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 0.9 WERE WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 10.000 % OF MEASURED.

      • ALL ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA WERE MET '**

Attachment 2 W3FI-2007-0044 Affidavit Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390 to W3F1-2007-0044 Page 1 of 1 AFFIDAVIT FOR WITHHOLDING PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(4) of 2.390 the following is furnished for consideration by the commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure should be withheld.

(ii) The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public, etc.

(a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process ( or-component, structure, tool, method, etc) where prevention of its use by any Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.

(b)

(c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality or licensing a similar product.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=W3F1-2007-0044,_Startup_Test_Activity_Reduction_(STAR)_Summary_Report_from_14th_Refueling_Outage&oldid=2572609"