Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Issue dateTitleTopic
ML20216G0324 March 1998Comment Re Draft RG DG-1071, Std Format & Content for Post- Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept. Recommends That Draft RG Be Revised to Accommodate Situations Similar to That Described for Unit 1
ML20113C66324 June 1996Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20115H7064 June 1996Submits Addl Info to Support Petition for Rulemaking PRM-72-3 Re Amend to SAR
ML20083N39726 April 1995Comment Supporting Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves
ML20081B3811 March 1995Comment Supporting Proposed Suppl 5 to GL 88-20, IPEEE for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities
ML20045D81214 June 1993Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 54 Re FSAR Update Submittals.
ML20126F27221 December 1992Comment Endorsing Positions & Comments of NUMARC & BWROG Re Draft GL, Augmented Inservice Insp Requirments for Mark I & Mark II Steel Containments,Refueling Cavities & Associated Drainage Sys
ML20011E4867 February 1990Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209
B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements20 September 1989Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements
ML20245G0723 August 1989Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants
ML20248B6202 August 1989Comments on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. NRC Should Permit Use of Potential Tax Refund as Source of Decommissioning Funds
ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement7 July 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement
ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 8906265 July 1989Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626
ML20246K4805 July 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components
ML20246D88130 June 1989Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components
ML20245D24816 June 1989Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors
ML20246Q29715 May 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20245J01914 April 1989Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20244B32410 April 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20247A2974 April 1989Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
B13113, Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel8 March 1989Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of DieselProbabilistic Risk Assessment
ML20236B4648 March 1989Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide FlexibilityProbabilistic Risk Assessment
ML20246N9478 March 1989Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9 Re Selection Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power PlantsProbabilistic Risk Assessment
JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants27 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power PlantsSystematic Assessment of Licensee Performance
Exemption Request
Backfit
B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague27 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too VagueBackfit
ML20235T35827 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Endorses Comments Filed by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group.Rule Fails to Provide Basis for Determining Effective Maint ProgramBackfit
ML20235V85427 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Committed to Goal of Achieving Improved Reliability & Safety Through Better MaintBackfit
ML20235T18624 February 1989Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, Extension of NRC Authority to BOP Portion of Plant & Misapplication of Adequate Protection Std of Backfit RuleBackfit
ML20235T73923 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants
ML20235N85314 February 1989Comment Supporting Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemptions Below Regulatory Concern.Policy Development for Criteria for Release of Radioactive Matl Needed for Development of Consistent Waste Mgt Practices
ML20235L5926 February 1989Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Chapter 1 Re Proposed Policy Statement Exemptions from Regulatory Control.Extreme Care Will Be Needed in Establishing State Role Both in Developing Rule & in Subsequent Implementation
ML20206M53221 November 1988Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty ProgramFitness for Duty
Backfit
ML20195H03321 November 1988Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug Testing.Util Strongly Favors 180- Day Period for Implementation of Rule & 360-day Implementation Period for Random Drug TestingFitness for Duty
JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments18 November 1988Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI CommentsFitness for Duty
ML20195H01118 November 1988Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re NRC Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug TestingFitness for Duty
ML20205Q15028 October 1988Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Safety Sys Functional Insps & Configuration Mgt Programs Support Renewal Basis as Opposed to Relicensing ProcessBackfit
ML20205Q20628 October 1988Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM 50-52 Re Exemption of Financial Qualifications of Applicants from Review of OL Applications.Petition Presents No Compelling Reason to Amend Current Rules
ML20205Q66627 October 1988Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Endorses NUMARC Nuplex Working Group Comments,Including Use of Licensing Basis at Facility When Renewal Application SubmittedProbabilistic Risk Assessment
Backfit
ML20205P96926 October 1988Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear License Renewal. Supports Contents of NUREG-1317 & Endorses NUMARC Comments on Rulemaking & Position Paper by NUMARC Nuplex Working Group
ML20195E65024 October 1988Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM 50-52 Re NRC Reinstatement of Financial Qualifications of Util as Consideration in Operating Licensing Hearings for Electric Utils
ML20205L27920 October 1988Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR150 Re Reasserting NRC Authority for Approving Onsite Low Level Waste Disposal in Agreement States
ML20205L79320 October 1988Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Onsite Incineration of Radwaste Oil
ML20205A7696 October 1988Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM 50-52 Re Potential Shutdown of Facility.Petition Should Receive Fair Hearing & Admit Use of Poor Judgment in Issuing Final Rule on 840812
ML20205N9846 October 1988Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-52 Re Necessity for Financial Stability of Utils Involved in Nuclear Power
ML20155E8933 October 1988Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i) Re Amending Implementation Schedule for Stabilization & Decontamination Priority & Trusteeship Provisions of Property Insurance Regulations.Nrc Initiated Exemptions Expected Before 881004Exemption Request
ML20154R64925 September 1988Requests Extension of Comment Period on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Reactor Licensing
ML20155A6593 September 1988Comment Supporting Petition to Rescind Paragraphs (X)(Y) of Section 10CFR50.54 Re Cases of Hazardous Practices Including Util Authorizing Senior Operator to Turn Off Safety Sys in Emergency Before Sys Has Finished Job
ML20154S3382 September 1988Comment on NUREG-1217 & NUREG-1218 Re Proposed Resolution of USI 1-47, Safety Implications of Control SysEarthquake
Backfit
ML20153F96817 August 1988Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Flexibility During Natl Crisis.Deferral of Issuance of Final Rule Until Proper Implementation Guidance Formulated Encouraged
ML20151L96226 July 1988Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re Revs of Fee Schedules.Requests That Commissioners Reexamine NRC Current Budgetary Processes in Order to Provide Greater Assurance of Reasonable Correlation Between Svcs & Costs
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/Special:Ask/-5B-5BCategory:PUBLIC-20COMMENTS-20ON-20PROPOSED-20RULES-20-26-20PETITIONS-20FOR-5D-5D-20-5B-5BSite::Peach-20Bottom-7C-7CLimerick-7C-7C05000000-5D-5D/-3FIssue-20date/-3FTitle/-3FTopic/mainlabel%3D/order%3D-20descending/sort%3D-20Issue-20date/offset%3D0/format%3Dtable/searchlabel%3D-5BTable-20view-5D"