ML20205L279
ML20205L279 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oyster Creek, Three Mile Island, 05000000 |
Issue date: | 10/20/1988 |
From: | Sullivan J GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
References | |
FRN-53FR31880, FRN-61FR26852, RULE-PR-150 53FR31880-00023, 53FR31880-23, AC57-1-074, AC57-1-72, AC57-1-73, AC57-1-74, C300-88-0469, C300-88-469, NUDOCS 8811020030 | |
Download: ML20205L279 (1) | |
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20210B8491999-07-21021 July 1999
[Table view]Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w),for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2 to Reduce Amount of Insurance for Unit to $50 Million for Onsite Property Damage Coverage ML20206D4141999-04-20020 April 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2 Re Enclosure of Cable & Equipment & Associated non-safety Related Circuits of One Redundant Train in Fire Barrier Having 1-hour Rating ML20206T7211999-02-11011 February 1999 Memorandum & Order (CLI-99-02).* Denies C George Request for Intervention & Dismisses Subpart M License Transfer Proceeding.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990211 ML20198A5111998-12-11011 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rulemaking Details Collaborative Efforts in That Rule Interjects Change ML20154G2941998-09-17017 September 1998 Transcript of 980917 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re License Transfer of TMI-1 from Gpu Nuclear,Inc to Amergen. Pp 1-41 ML20199J0121997-11-20020 November 1997 Comment on Pr 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommisioning Nuclear Power Reactors.Three Mile Island Alert Invokes Comments of P Bradford,Former NRC Member ML20148R7581997-06-30030 June 1997 Comment on NRC Proposed Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems. Licensee References Proposed Generic Communication, Control Rod Insertion, & Ltrs & 961022 from B&W Owners Group DD-97-14, Director'S Decision DD-97-14 Re Petitioner Request That NRC Direct Licensee to Shut Down Plant During Upcoming Planned Transfer of Fuel from Wet to Dry Storage.Petition Dismissed as Premature for Listed Reason1997-06-16016 June 1997 Director'S Decision DD-97-14 Re Petitioner Request That NRC Direct Licensee to Shut Down Plant During Upcoming Planned Transfer of Fuel from Wet to Dry Storage.Petition Dismissed as Premature for Listed Reason ML20136F3061997-03-12012 March 1997 Order.* Informs That Time within Which Commission May Take Sua Sponte Review of Memorandum & Order LBP-97-01 Extended to 970326.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 970312 ML20134K5631997-01-31031 January 1997 Memorandum & order,LBP-97-01 (Ruling on Summary of Disposition Motion).* Gpun 961115 Motion for Summary Disposition Granted.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 970131 ML20133E3601997-01-0303 January 1997 Memorandum (Oral Argument on Dispositive Motion).* Advises Parties That Board Will Not Hold Oral Argument Re Gpun Motion.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 970103 ML20133E3641996-12-20020 December 1996 Licensee Reply to Petitioner Opposition to Motion for Summary Disposition.* Petitioner Response Raises No Legal Restrictions to Changing Ts.Petitioner Contention Should Be Dismissed & Licensee Motion Granted.W/Certificate of Svc ML20132F7711996-12-16016 December 1996 Affidavit of RB Eaton in Support of NRC Staff Response in Support of Licensee Motion for Summary Disposition ML20135F5211996-12-0606 December 1996 Affidavit of H Walker in Support of NRC Staff Response in Support of Licensee Motion for Summary Disposition.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20135F4681996-12-0606 December 1996 NRC Staff Response in Support of Licensee Motion for Summary Disposition.* Confirms That Intervenors Contentions Do Not Raise Any Issue of Law or Fact & Licensee Entitled to Summary Deposition as Matter of Law ML20135F4411996-12-0606 December 1996 Petitioner Opposition to Gpun Motion for Summary Disposition.* Petitioners Argue That Gpun Seeks Amend to Permit Onsite Storage of Irradiated Fuel,Not Offsite Shipment.Motion Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20134L5851996-11-15015 November 1996 Affidavit of Jc Fornicola.* Supports Licensee Motion for Summary Disposition in Proceeding ML20134L5791996-11-15015 November 1996 Licensee Statement of Matls Facts as to Which No Genuine Dispute.* Submits Listed Concise Statement of Matl Facts ML20134L5671996-11-15015 November 1996 Licensee Motion for Summary Disposition.* Petitioner Contention Should Be Dismissed ML20134L5361996-11-14014 November 1996 Notice of Hearing (Application to Approve TS Change).* Informs of 961107 Finding That Proposed TS Change Involves No Significant Hazards Consideration & License Amend Issued.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 961114 ML20129K2681996-11-0808 November 1996 Order (Corrections to LBP-96-23).* Changes Listed.W/ Certificate of Svc.Served on 961108 ML20129J5881996-10-25025 October 1996 Memorandum & Order (Ruling on Intervention Petition).* NRC Denies Citizens Awareness Network & Oyster Creek Nuclear Watch Request & Petition to Intervene Seeking to Challenge Proposed TS Change.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 961025 ML20117N8161996-09-0909 September 1996 Petition Status Rept to GP Bollwerk,P Lam & C Kelber Re Gpun .* Petitioners Cannot Accept as Acceptable Settlement in Lieu of Decision by ASLB Re 960807 Prehearing.W/Certificate of Svc ML20116N6321996-08-15015 August 1996 Petitioners Communication to GP Bollwerk,P Lam & C Kelber Re Settlement W/Gpun.* Petitioners Request Board Decision on Standing & Merit of Contention.W/Certificate of Svc ML20129A9551996-08-0707 August 1996 Applicant Exhibit A-1,consisting of Figure 1 Re Cask Drop Protection Sys Top Plate ML20129A9601996-08-0707 August 1996 Applicant Exhibit A-2,consisting of Figure 2 Re Cask Drop Protection Sys (Showing Steel Guide Cylinder & Dashpot) ML20129A9771996-08-0707 August 1996 Applicant Exhibit A-3,consisting of Drawing 2118-1013 ML20129A9821996-08-0707 August 1996 Applicant Exhibit A-4,consisting of Diagram ML20129A9881996-08-0707 August 1996 Applicant Exhibit A-5,consisting of Diagram ML20129B0091996-08-0707 August 1996 Intervenor Exhibit I-NIRS-1,consisting of Comments Before ASLB Prehearing Conference on Behalf of Petitioners Nirs, Ocnw & Can.Sumitted by Petitioner ML20116G7101996-07-29029 July 1996 Gpun Answer to Supplemental Petition of Nuclear Info & Resource Svc,Oyster Creek Nuclear Watch & Citizens Awareness Network.* Gpun Opposes Petition.W/Certificate of Svc ML20116A9211996-07-18018 July 1996 Supplemental Petition of Nuclear Info & Resources Svc,Oyster Creek Nuclear Watch & Citizens Awareness Network.* Petitioners Assert That NUREG-0612 Can Be Relied on to Support Allegations.W/Certificate of Svc ML20116A9101996-07-18018 July 1996 Petitioners Reply to NRC Staff & Gpun Answer Opposing Request for Hearing & Petition for Intervention of Nuclear Info & Resource Svc,Oyster Creek Nuclear Watch & Citizens Awareness Network.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20115B9891996-07-0202 July 1996 Motion for Leave to Reply.* Petitioners Can Be Prepared to Submit Reply by 960712.W/Certificate of Svc ML20115B9581996-06-28028 June 1996 Notice of Appearance for Plant.* Informs W Decamp Will Enter Appearance in Proceeding Re License Amend for Movement of Heavy Loads.W/Certificate of Svc ML20113D3121996-06-28028 June 1996 Notice of Appearance for Nuclear Info & Resource Svc.* Notifies That P Gunter Will Appear on Behalf of Members of Nuclear Info & Resource Svc Including Member W Decamp. W/Certificate of Svc ML20114E6431996-06-21021 June 1996 Gpun Answer Opposing Request for Hearing & Petition for Intervention of Nuclear Info & Resource Svc,Oyster Creek Nuclear Watch & Citizens Awareness Network.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 960624 ML20113D1611996-06-10010 June 1996 Notice of Appearance for Citizen Awareness Network.* Informs That Katz Will Appear on Behalf of Members of Citizens Awareness Network Including Streeter ML20112J9541996-06-0707 June 1996 Affidavit.* Affidavit of M Szczech Re Request by Gpu to Continue Active Operation of Facility While Heavy Load Fuel Rods Are Being Removed,On Health,Safety & Properties of Residents of Ocean Township ML20112J8151996-06-0606 June 1996 Nirs,Oyster Creek Nuclear Watch & Citizens Awareness Network Request for Hearing & Petition to Intervene on Gpu Nuclear License Amend Request for Plant.* ML20112J9861996-06-0505 June 1996 Affidavit.* Affidavit of J Burnett Re License Amend for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Movement of Heavy Loads ML20112J9771996-06-0505 June 1996 Affidavit.* Affidavit of SR Schmidt Re License Amend for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Movement of Heavy Loads ML20112J8651996-06-0505 June 1996 Affidavit.* Affidavit of D Katz Re Effects of Experimental Transfer of Fuel at Plant While Reactor Operational Into Dry Cask Storage ML20112J8441996-06-0505 June 1996 Affidavit.* Affidavit of W Decamp Re License Amend for Movement of Heavy Loads Over Fuel Pool ML20087B3151995-06-28028 June 1995 Comment on Proposed Generic Communication Re Testing of safety-related Logic Ciruits.Five Areas of Concern,Including Tracking of Contact testing,non-technical Specs Required Sys & Define Sys to Be Reviewed,Listed for Review ML20084H9251995-06-0202 June 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Change in State Cooperative Agreements Program Concerning NRC Intention to Reduce Scope of Work.Believes That NRC Should Maintain Environ Monitoring Program & Find Other Ways to Reduce Duplicative Svcs ML20078H0431995-02-0101 February 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Lowpower Operations for Nuclear Reactors ML20078A0281995-01-12012 January 1995 Comment Requesting Extension to Comment Period on Proposed Amend by Util to Change TS to Allow Use of Addl 45 Existing Existing Spent Fuel Storage Locations in Spent Fuel Pool ML20077E8231994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule ML20071L2561994-07-12012 July 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Random Drug Testing for Employees Working at NPP 1999-07-21 Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR MONTHYEARML20198A5111998-12-11011 December 1998
[Table view]Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rulemaking Details Collaborative Efforts in That Rule Interjects Change ML20199J0121997-11-20020 November 1997 Comment on Pr 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommisioning Nuclear Power Reactors.Three Mile Island Alert Invokes Comments of P Bradford,Former NRC Member ML20148R7581997-06-30030 June 1997 Comment on NRC Proposed Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems. Licensee References Proposed Generic Communication, Control Rod Insertion, & Ltrs & 961022 from B&W Owners Group ML20087B3151995-06-28028 June 1995 Comment on Proposed Generic Communication Re Testing of safety-related Logic Ciruits.Five Areas of Concern,Including Tracking of Contact testing,non-technical Specs Required Sys & Define Sys to Be Reviewed,Listed for Review ML20084H9251995-06-0202 June 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Change in State Cooperative Agreements Program Concerning NRC Intention to Reduce Scope of Work.Believes That NRC Should Maintain Environ Monitoring Program & Find Other Ways to Reduce Duplicative Svcs ML20078H0431995-02-0101 February 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Lowpower Operations for Nuclear Reactors ML20078A0281995-01-12012 January 1995 Comment Requesting Extension to Comment Period on Proposed Amend by Util to Change TS to Allow Use of Addl 45 Existing Existing Spent Fuel Storage Locations in Spent Fuel Pool ML20077E8231994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule ML20071L2561994-07-12012 July 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Random Drug Testing for Employees Working at NPP ML20096A0841992-04-29029 April 1992 Comment Supporting BWROG Comments on Draft NUREG-1449, Shutdown & Low Power Operation at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants in Us ML20079E2181991-09-30030 September 1991 Submits Comments on NRC Proposed Resolution of Generic Issue 23, Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Failure. Informs That Util Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20066J3031991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Supporting SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept ML20059P0531990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal ML20055F4411990-06-28028 June 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR ML20011E4861990-02-0707 February 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements1989-09-20020 September 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements ML20245G0721989-08-0303 August 1989 Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants ML20248B6201989-08-0202 August 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. NRC Should Permit Use of Potential Tax Refund as Source of Decommissioning Funds ML20248B6381989-07-25025 July 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170, Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. Suggests That Scope of Proposed Rule Be Broadened to Include All Forms of Dry Storage Modules ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement1989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement ML20246K4221989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Industry on-going Improvement Efforts Should Be Given Opportunity to Resolve Issues ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 8906261989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626 ML20246K4801989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20246D8811989-06-30030 June 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20245D2481989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors ML20246Q2971989-05-15015 May 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20245J0191989-04-14014 April 1989 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20244B3241989-04-10010 April 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20247A2971989-04-0404 April 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants B13113, Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel1989-03-0808 March 1989 Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel ML20236B4641989-03-0808 March 1989 Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide Flexibility ML20246N9471989-03-0808 March 1989 Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9 Re Selection Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague ML20235T3581989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Endorses Comments Filed by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group.Rule Fails to Provide Basis for Determining Effective Maint Program ML20235V8541989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Committed to Goal of Achieving Improved Reliability & Safety Through Better Maint ML20235T1861989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, Extension of NRC Authority to BOP Portion of Plant & Misapplication of Adequate Protection Std of Backfit Rule ML20235T7391989-02-23023 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants ML20235N8531989-02-14014 February 1989 Comment Supporting Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemptions Below Regulatory Concern.Policy Development for Criteria for Release of Radioactive Matl Needed for Development of Consistent Waste Mgt Practices ML20235L5921989-02-0606 February 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Chapter 1 Re Proposed Policy Statement Exemptions from Regulatory Control.Extreme Care Will Be Needed in Establishing State Role Both in Developing Rule & in Subsequent Implementation ML20206M5321988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program ML20195H0331988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug Testing.Util Strongly Favors 180- Day Period for Implementation of Rule & 360-day Implementation Period for Random Drug Testing ML20206M7751988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Random Drug Testing JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20195H0111988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re NRC Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug Testing ML20205Q1501988-10-28028 October 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Safety Sys Functional Insps & Configuration Mgt Programs Support Renewal Basis as Opposed to Relicensing Process ML20205Q2061988-10-28028 October 1988 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM 50-52 Re Exemption of Financial Qualifications of Applicants from Review of OL Applications.Petition Presents No Compelling Reason to Amend Current Rules ML20205Q6661988-10-27027 October 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Endorses NUMARC Nuplex Working Group Comments,Including Use of Licensing Basis at Facility When Renewal Application Submitted ML20205P9691988-10-26026 October 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear License Renewal. Supports Contents of NUREG-1317 & Endorses NUMARC Comments on Rulemaking & Position Paper by NUMARC Nuplex Working Group ML20195E6501988-10-24024 October 1988 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM 50-52 Re NRC Reinstatement of Financial Qualifications of Util as Consideration in Operating Licensing Hearings for Electric Utils 1998-12-11 |
Text
. .
' f[q'.
GPU Nuclean Corporation
.J
' ggy =
'88 TT 24 R2:04 One Upper Pond Road Pa*s ppany, New Jersey 07054 201 316 7000 TELEX 136-482 Wnters Direct D.at Number; grs g . . - , ,
y0CKE 1e4 i .. - ".'11 Oclo$eY20,1988 C300-88-0469 Secretary of the Commission DOCKEi NU,7SER p U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission PROP 0bt0 RULE y A_LO -
Washington. 0.C. 20555 (63EM ai 6-te Attn: Docketing and Service Branch
Dear Sir:
Subject:
Proposed Rule, "Reasserting NRC's Authority for Approving Onsite Low-Level Waste Disposal in Agreement States" (10 CFR 150)
The Commission reauested comments on the subject proposed rule as noticed in 53 FR 31880, 8/22/86. GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPUN) supports the proposed revision to 10 CFR 150.15(a) as appropriate and prudent. Currently, GPUN facilities are not located in Agreement Ststes (NJ and PA). However, this may change in the future.
Very t' yours,
, /j . .'
J. L. Sulliv Jr.
Director, Licensing & Regulatory Affairs JLS/PC/pa(7570f) cc: CARIRS f
??kEOh330001024 150 53pp3ABDO PDR GPU N#ea' Corpcraton is a sutsdary cf Genera! Pub c Ut tes Corpceaton y hd 3