Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Issue dateTitleTopic
ML20207E0052 March 1999Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation EnclMissed surveillance
Fire Protection Program
ML20236H93830 June 1998Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation EnclSafe Shutdown
Half scram
Foreign Material Exclusion
U-602875, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Rule for Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors21 November 1997Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Rule for Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20198P3004 November 1997Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & ViewgraphsSafe Shutdown
Temporary Modification
U-602719, Comment Supporting Proposed Communication;Gl 97-XX, Assurance of Sufficient Net Positive Suction Head for ECCS & Containment Heat Removal Pumps20 March 1997Comment Supporting Proposed Communication;Gl 97-XX, Assurance of Sufficient Net Positive Suction Head for ECCS & Containment Heat Removal Pumps
ML20136F28411 March 1997Memorandum & Order (Terminating Proceeding).* Grants Southwestern Electric Cooperative 970311 Motion to Terminate Proceeding & Dismisses 970228 Petition for Leave to Intervene.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 970311
ML20136F3287 March 1997Establishment of Atomic Safety & Licensing Board.* Board Being Established in Following Proceeding to Rule on Petitions for Leave to Intervene And/Or Requests for Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 970307
ML20136F35628 February 1997Petition for Leave to Intervene of Southwestern Electric Cooperative,Inc.* Requests That Commission Grant Petition for Leave to Intervene & Grant Other Relief as Commission Deems Appropriate.W/Certificate of Svc
U-602603, Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors21 June 1996Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors
U-602559, Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Unauthorized Use of Licensed Radioactive Matl.Proposes Changes to Wording of Pr27 February 1996Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Unauthorized Use of Licensed Radioactive Matl.Proposes Changes to Wording of Pr
U-602408, Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Plant Shutdown & Low Power Operations.Requests Addl Period for Public Comment Be Made Available1 February 1995Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Plant Shutdown & Low Power Operations.Requests Addl Period for Public Comment Be Made Available
ML20071N48621 July 1994Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Changing 10CFR50 & 73 for Frequency W/Which Licensee Conduct Independent Reviews & Audits of Safeguards Contingency Plan & Security Program from Every 12 Months to Every 24 Months
ML20059C23517 December 1993Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication
ML20056G33527 August 1993Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process
U-601930, Comment Opposing Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys - 10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting30 January 1992Comment Opposing Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys - 10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting
ML20070E46726 February 1991Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-73-9 Re Upgrading Design Basis Threat for Radiological Sabotage of Nuclear Reactors.Recommends That NRC Deny Petition to Increase Design Basis Threat for Security
JSP-860-90, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty30 October 1990Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty
ML20043F9946 June 1990Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55, Coordinating Revs of FSAR W/Refueling Cycles.Approval of Rulemaking Change Would Provide for More Logical & Timely Basis for Incorporating Plant Procedure Changes in Future
ML20011E4867 February 1990Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209
ML20248D28328 September 1989Notice of Appearance.* Advises That Author Will Enter Appearance in Proceeding on Behalf of Nrc.W/Certificate of Svc
ML20247Q26626 September 1989Establishment of Aslb.* Board Will Comprise of Mb Margulies, Chairman & Oh Paris & Fj Shon,Members.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 890926
ML20247R48122 September 1989Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Providing Comments on Ocre Petition Requesting NRC to Reopen ATWS Rulemaking Proceeding.No Basis Found for Ocre Petition Since Stability Considered During ATWS Rulemaking
B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements20 September 1989Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements
ML20248C87513 September 1989Response to Order Modifying Licenses & Order to Show Cause Why Licenses Should Not Be Revoked.* Requests Hearing on Issues,Including Funds for Equipment.Supporting Info EnclSafe Shutdown
Incorporated by reference
Exemption Request
ML20247F1146 September 1989Petition for Rulemaking 50-53 Reopening ATWS Rulemaking Proceeding in Light of Power Oscillations Occurring at Facility Following Dual Recirculation Pump Trip on 880309. Listed Encl Repts Should Be Made Part of RecordAnticipated operational occurrence
Power change
ML20246C71418 August 1989Order to Show Cause Why CPs CPEP-1 & CPEP-2 Should Not Be Revoked & Requiring Licensee to Notify Commission at Least 30 Days Before Taking Possession of Any Classified Equipment
ML20245G0723 August 1989Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants
ML20248B6202 August 1989Comments on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. NRC Should Permit Use of Potential Tax Refund as Source of Decommissioning Funds
ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement7 July 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement
ML20246K4805 July 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components
ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 8906265 July 1989Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626
ML20246D88130 June 1989Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components
ML20245D24816 June 1989Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors
ML20246Q29715 May 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20245J01914 April 1989Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20244B32410 April 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20247A2974 April 1989Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20246M27720 March 1989Decision.* Affirms Board Decision LBP-89-05 Granting CP & OL to Licensee.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890321
ML20246N9478 March 1989Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9 Re Selection Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power PlantsProbabilistic Risk Assessment
B13113, Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel8 March 1989Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of DieselProbabilistic Risk Assessment
ML20236B4648 March 1989Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide FlexibilityProbabilistic Risk Assessment
ML20235T35827 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Endorses Comments Filed by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group.Rule Fails to Provide Basis for Determining Effective Maint ProgramBackfit
B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague27 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too VagueBackfit
JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants27 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power PlantsSystematic Assessment of Licensee Performance
Exemption Request
Backfit
ML20235V85427 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Committed to Goal of Achieving Improved Reliability & Safety Through Better MaintBackfit
ML20235T18624 February 1989Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, Extension of NRC Authority to BOP Portion of Plant & Misapplication of Adequate Protection Std of Backfit RuleBackfit
ML20235T73923 February 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants
ML20235N85314 February 1989Comment Supporting Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemptions Below Regulatory Concern.Policy Development for Criteria for Release of Radioactive Matl Needed for Development of Consistent Waste Mgt Practices
ML20235L5926 February 1989Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Chapter 1 Re Proposed Policy Statement Exemptions from Regulatory Control.Extreme Care Will Be Needed in Establishing State Role Both in Developing Rule & in Subsequent Implementation
ML20247R40931 December 1988Transcript of Commission 881221 Press Conference in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-31