Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Issue date | Title | Topic | |
---|---|---|---|
ML20207E005 | 2 March 1999 | Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl | Missed surveillance Fire Protection Program |
ML20236H938 | 30 June 1998 | Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl | Safe Shutdown Half scram Foreign Material Exclusion |
U-602875, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Rule for Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors | 21 November 1997 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Rule for Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors | |
ML20198P300 | 4 November 1997 | Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs | Safe Shutdown Temporary Modification |
U-602719, Comment Supporting Proposed Communication;Gl 97-XX, Assurance of Sufficient Net Positive Suction Head for ECCS & Containment Heat Removal Pumps | 20 March 1997 | Comment Supporting Proposed Communication;Gl 97-XX, Assurance of Sufficient Net Positive Suction Head for ECCS & Containment Heat Removal Pumps | |
ML20136F284 | 11 March 1997 | Memorandum & Order (Terminating Proceeding).* Grants Southwestern Electric Cooperative 970311 Motion to Terminate Proceeding & Dismisses 970228 Petition for Leave to Intervene.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 970311 | |
ML20136F328 | 7 March 1997 | Establishment of Atomic Safety & Licensing Board.* Board Being Established in Following Proceeding to Rule on Petitions for Leave to Intervene And/Or Requests for Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 970307 | |
ML20136F356 | 28 February 1997 | Petition for Leave to Intervene of Southwestern Electric Cooperative,Inc.* Requests That Commission Grant Petition for Leave to Intervene & Grant Other Relief as Commission Deems Appropriate.W/Certificate of Svc | |
U-602603, Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors | 21 June 1996 | Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors | |
U-602559, Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Unauthorized Use of Licensed Radioactive Matl.Proposes Changes to Wording of Pr | 27 February 1996 | Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Unauthorized Use of Licensed Radioactive Matl.Proposes Changes to Wording of Pr | |
U-602408, Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Plant Shutdown & Low Power Operations.Requests Addl Period for Public Comment Be Made Available | 1 February 1995 | Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Plant Shutdown & Low Power Operations.Requests Addl Period for Public Comment Be Made Available | |
ML20071N486 | 21 July 1994 | Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Changing 10CFR50 & 73 for Frequency W/Which Licensee Conduct Independent Reviews & Audits of Safeguards Contingency Plan & Security Program from Every 12 Months to Every 24 Months | |
ML20059C235 | 17 December 1993 | Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication | |
ML20056G335 | 27 August 1993 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process | |
U-601930, Comment Opposing Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys - 10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting | 30 January 1992 | Comment Opposing Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys - 10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting | |
ML20070E467 | 26 February 1991 | Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-73-9 Re Upgrading Design Basis Threat for Radiological Sabotage of Nuclear Reactors.Recommends That NRC Deny Petition to Increase Design Basis Threat for Security | |
JSP-860-90, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty | 30 October 1990 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty | |
ML20043F994 | 6 June 1990 | Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55, Coordinating Revs of FSAR W/Refueling Cycles.Approval of Rulemaking Change Would Provide for More Logical & Timely Basis for Incorporating Plant Procedure Changes in Future | |
ML20011E486 | 7 February 1990 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 | |
ML20248D283 | 28 September 1989 | Notice of Appearance.* Advises That Author Will Enter Appearance in Proceeding on Behalf of Nrc.W/Certificate of Svc | |
ML20247Q266 | 26 September 1989 | Establishment of Aslb.* Board Will Comprise of Mb Margulies, Chairman & Oh Paris & Fj Shon,Members.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 890926 | |
ML20247R481 | 22 September 1989 | Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Providing Comments on Ocre Petition Requesting NRC to Reopen ATWS Rulemaking Proceeding.No Basis Found for Ocre Petition Since Stability Considered During ATWS Rulemaking | |
B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements | 20 September 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements | |
ML20248C875 | 13 September 1989 | Response to Order Modifying Licenses & Order to Show Cause Why Licenses Should Not Be Revoked.* Requests Hearing on Issues,Including Funds for Equipment.Supporting Info Encl | Safe Shutdown Incorporated by reference Exemption Request |
ML20247F114 | 6 September 1989 | Petition for Rulemaking 50-53 Reopening ATWS Rulemaking Proceeding in Light of Power Oscillations Occurring at Facility Following Dual Recirculation Pump Trip on 880309. Listed Encl Repts Should Be Made Part of Record | Anticipated operational occurrence Power change |
ML20246C714 | 18 August 1989 | Order to Show Cause Why CPs CPEP-1 & CPEP-2 Should Not Be Revoked & Requiring Licensee to Notify Commission at Least 30 Days Before Taking Possession of Any Classified Equipment | |
ML20245G072 | 3 August 1989 | Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants | |
ML20248B620 | 2 August 1989 | Comments on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. NRC Should Permit Use of Potential Tax Refund as Source of Decommissioning Funds | |
ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement | 7 July 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement | |
ML20246K480 | 5 July 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components | |
ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626 | 5 July 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626 | |
ML20246D881 | 30 June 1989 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components | |
ML20245D248 | 16 June 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors | |
ML20246Q297 | 15 May 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20245J019 | 14 April 1989 | Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20244B324 | 10 April 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20247A297 | 4 April 1989 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20246M277 | 20 March 1989 | Decision.* Affirms Board Decision LBP-89-05 Granting CP & OL to Licensee.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890321 | |
ML20246N947 | 8 March 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9 Re Selection Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants | Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
B13113, Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel | 8 March 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel | Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
ML20236B464 | 8 March 1989 | Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide Flexibility | Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
ML20235T358 | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Endorses Comments Filed by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group.Rule Fails to Provide Basis for Determining Effective Maint Program | Backfit |
B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague | Backfit |
JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Exemption Request Backfit |
ML20235V854 | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Committed to Goal of Achieving Improved Reliability & Safety Through Better Maint | Backfit |
ML20235T186 | 24 February 1989 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, Extension of NRC Authority to BOP Portion of Plant & Misapplication of Adequate Protection Std of Backfit Rule | Backfit |
ML20235T739 | 23 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants | |
ML20235N853 | 14 February 1989 | Comment Supporting Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemptions Below Regulatory Concern.Policy Development for Criteria for Release of Radioactive Matl Needed for Development of Consistent Waste Mgt Practices | |
ML20235L592 | 6 February 1989 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Chapter 1 Re Proposed Policy Statement Exemptions from Regulatory Control.Extreme Care Will Be Needed in Establishing State Role Both in Developing Rule & in Subsequent Implementation | |
ML20247R409 | 31 December 1988 | Transcript of Commission 881221 Press Conference in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-31 |