PLA-5459, 2001 Annual Environmental Operating Report (Non-Radiological)

2001 Annual Environmental Operating Report (Non-Radiological)

ML021330109
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	04/29/2002
From:	Byram R Susquehanna
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
PLA-5459
Download: ML021330109 (24)

Text

Robert G. Byram PPL Susquehanna, LLC Senior Vice President and Two North Ninth Street I.bi b.

Chief Nuclear Officer Allentown, PA 18101-1179 "*?,,.,U--

Tel. 610.774.7502 Fax 610.774.6092 rgbyram@pplweb.com PPI .::,-'

4, TM APR 2 9 2002 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Mail Station OP 1-17 Washington, D. C. 20555 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL) Docket Nos. 50-387 PLA-5459 and 50-388 The Susquehanna SES Annual Environmental Operating Report (Non-radiological) is hereby submitted for the calendar year 2001 in accordance with the Environmental Protection Plan.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Robert D. Kichline at (610) 774-7705.

Sincerely, Copy: NRC Region I Mr. S. L. Hansell, NRC Sr. Resident Inspector - SSES Mr. T. G. Colbum, NRC Sr. Project Manager

Document Control Desk PLA-5459 APR 2 9 2002 bcc: M. B. Detamore GENA93 w/attach.

t!

R. L. Doty GENA93 R. D. Kichline GENA61 It R. D. Pagodin GENA63 it B. E. Rhoads NUCSA1 if H. L. Riley GENA12 C. H. Saxton NUCSB2 ti W. F. Tabor NUCSA3 ft T. G. Wales GENA63 it H. D. Woodeshick SSO R. L. Anderson NUCSB3 w/o attach.

1t T. G. Bannon GENA12 it ft J. S. Fields GENA93 T. L. Harpster GENA61 ft L. I. Ratzell GENTW8 ft B. L. Shriver NUCSB3 I,

R. E. Smith NUCSB2 A. J. Wrape GENA62 NRA Files GENA61 w/attach.

Nuclear Records GENA62 w/attach.

Attn: P. Brown Mr. D. J. Allard w/attach.

Bureau of Radiation Protection Department of Environmental Protection P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17120

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Units I & 2 2001 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NONRADIOL OGICAL) pp, I*3lU .-

PPL Susquehanna, LLC Berwick, PA April 2002

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Units I & 2 2001 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NONRADIOL OGICAL)

Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-14 & NPF-22 Docket Nos. 50-387 & 50-388 prepared by Environmental Services Operations Technology PPL Susquehanna, LLC Berwick, PA April 2002

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NONRADIOLOGICAL) 2001 Date: 3/4o/az Prepared by:

J lore S. Fields S ior Environmental Scientist-Nuclear Date: 4(z &

Reviewed by:

urvisoH. Saxto Supervisor-Services & Programs Approved by:

2A~i&~-Date:

Michael B. Detamore Supervisor - Environmental Services - Nuclear

FOREWORD The Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (Susquehanna SES) consists of two boiling water reactors, each with a net electrical generating capacity of 1,1100 megawatts for Unit 1 and 1,120 Unit 2. The site consists of approximately 3,300 acres, of which 1,700 acres are located in Salem Township, Luzeme County, Pennsylvania, approximately five miles northeast of Berwick, Pennsylvania. An additional 1,600 acres of recreational land on the east side of the Susquehanna River are located in Conyngham and Hollenback Townships. Under terms of an agreement finalized in January 1978, 90% of the Susquehanna SES is owned by PPL Susquehanna, LLC (Licensee) and 10% by the Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.

This report discusses environmental commitments and impacts from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001.

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO.

Foreword Table of Contents ii 1.0 OBJECTIVE 1-1 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 2-1 2.1 Aquatic Issues 2-1 2.2 Terrestrial Issues 2-3 2.2.1 Studies Previously Completed 2-3 2.2.2 Sound Level Survey 2-3 2.2.3 Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors 2-3 2.3 Cultural Resources Issues 2-3 3.0 CONSISTENCY REQUIREMENTS 3-1 3.1 Plant Design and Operation 3-1 3.2 Reporting Related to NPDES Permits and State Certifications 3-2 3.3 Changes Required for Compliance with other Environmental 3-2 Regulations 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 4-1 4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events 4-1 4.2 Environmental Monitoring 4-3 4.2.1 General Monitoring 4-3 4.2.2 Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors 4-3 ii

L .- II SECTION PAGE NO.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 5-1 5.1 Review and Audit 5-1 5.2 Records Retention 5-1 5.3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan 5-1 5.4 Plant Reporting Requirements 5-2 5.4.1 Routine Reports 5-2 5.4.2 Nonroutine Reports 5-2 6.0 ATTACHMENTS 6-1 Exhibit I American Shad Impingement Letter Table 2.1-1 2001 Shad Impingement Monitoring Program Figure 5.1-1 Auditing Organization Chart iii

1.0 OBJECTIVE The Licensee has developed procedures and-guidelines to ensure that operation of Susquehanna SES does not adversely affect the environment in the vicinity of the station. 'Also, these pro6ed8ures allocate responsibilities and interfaces necessary to monitor environmental impacts. They include coordination of U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements and consistency with other federal, state, and local requirements for environmental protection.

The objective of this 2001 Annual Environmental operating Report (Nonradiological) is to provide a summary of both environmental programs and procedures as required in the Final Environmental Statement (FES) related to the operation of the Susquehanna SES, Unit 1 and 2, NUREG-0564, June 1981, and Appendix B - Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) to Operating Licenses, No. NPF-14 and No. NPF-22. The 2001 report is the 20th Annual Environmental Operating Report (Nonradiological) submitted to meet EPP requirements.

The Licensee submitted an Environmental Report-Operating License Stage for Susquehanna SES to the NRC in May 1978. This report reviewed the results of the preoperational environmental programs and.described the preoperational and proposed operational environmental monitoring programs. The NRC and other agencies reviewed this report and made recommendations for operational environmental monitoring programs which were ilisted in the FES.

1-1

2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 2.1 Aquatic Issues The aquatic monitoring program for operation of the Susquehanna SES is divided into two parts. Part 1 includes effluent monitoring required by a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PaDEP).

Monthly discharge monitoring reports are submitted to the PaDEP as part of the permitting requirements. The station's operational NPDES permit No. PA-0047325 was reissued on July 7, 2000, and is to expire on July 6, 2005.

The PaDEP is responsible for regulating the water quality permit for the Susquehanna SES. The NPDES permit deals with discharge parameters for the Susquehanna SES Sewage Treatment Plant, Cooling Tower blowdown, and miscellaneous low volume waste discharges. The Cooling Tower blowdown also includes in-plant process streams which discharge to the Susquehanna River. Various low volume waste sumps discharge to the storm sewers which flow into Lake Took-a-while, and eventually into the Susquehanna River. NPDES permit limits were included in the 2000 Annual Report.

Part 2 of the aquatic monitoring program deals with programs listed in the FES or recommended by the PaDEP or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

American Shad The Susquehanna Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee continued to administer programs to restore American Shad (Alosa sapadissima)to the Susquehanna River in 2001. The restoration program is a continuing commitment to return shad and other migratory fishes to historic spawning and nursery waters above the four major dams in the Susquehanna River.

This spring was characterized by relatively low river flows and a record number of 193,574 American shad were captured at the Conowingo Dam (Ref. 2.1-1). Lifts at Holtwood and Safe Harbor also passed record numbers of shad and from 3 May through 8 June, 16,200 shad migrated upriver through the fourth fishway at York Haven which was well over a three-fold increase at York Haven compared to 2000.

The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) continued to operate the shad culture facility along the Juniata River at the Van Dyke Research Station, at Thompsontown, Pennsylvania. Throughout May, 2-1

sI 21.13 million (M) shad eggs were delivered to the hatchery from the Delaware River (6.35 M) and the Hudson River (3.92 M), Conowingo Dam (5.81 M), and US Fish and Wildlife Service - Lamar (5.05 M). These eggs yielded 6.525 M fry, 80% of which were stocked in the Susquehanna River. The stocking nearest the Susquehanna SES was a release of 677,000 fry about 50 miles upriver near Tunkhannock, Pennsylvania, in mid-June.

Adult shad probably did not spawn near the Susquehanna SES in 2001 because their upriver migration was. blocked by the Sunbury Fabri-dam, which was inflated earlier than normal in mid-May because of low river flows. However, juvenile shad from the fry stocked at Tunkhannock in mid-June were expected to pass by the Susquehanna SES Intake in August-September.

The Susquehanna SES intake screens were monitored daily for impinged juvenile American shad from 11 September through 16 October 2001, at the request of Mr. Richard St. Pierre, Susquehanna River Coordinator for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (see Exhibit 1). Although no shad were taken, 18 other fish of 4 species were captured (Table 2.1-1). Monitoring is scheduled to begin in August of 2002 now that scaffolding and related safety features have been installed at the intake wash structure adjacent to the Susquehanna SES river water intake.

Biofouling Mollusk Monitorinq The biofouling mollusks monitoring program was continued at the Susquehanna SES in 2001. The monitoring program currently involves a biweekly schedule of artificial substrate sampling in the river near the Susquehanna SES from May through November. Artificial substrates are also maintained in side-stream samplers located in the Intake Structure and on the plant site. In addition, periodic inspections of natural substrates were performed in the Susquehanna River near Susquehanna SES and in the Emergency Service Water Spray Pond. Finally, natural river substrates are examined at locations 40 miles above and below the power plant during the fall.

In past years, Zebra mussels (Dreissennapolymorpha) were found in samples near Johnson City, New York, about 150 miles upriver. To date, no Zebra mussels have been observed in the vicinity of Susquehanna SES.

The same, however, cannot be said for Asiatic clams (Corbicula fluminea). Previous to 2001, Asiatic clams had been present 40 miles downriver at Northumberland, Pennsylvania. This fall, live clams were observed for the first time in the North Branch, near Bloomsburg, 2-2

approximately 18 miles downriver from Susquehanna SES. Additionally, a live clam was collected from the Susquehanna SES's Unit 1 B High Pressure Coolant Injection System Room cooler in December. Additional monitoring and evaluation of control strategies have been initiated.

2.2 Terrestrial Issues 2.2.1 Studies Previously Completed Terrestrial environmental studies completed prior to 1989 included Cooling Tower bird impaction and -sound level surveys.

2.2.2 Sound Level Survey An increase in station power generation of 5% was completed during spring 1995. A power uprate sound level-survey was conducted in June 1995.

2.2.3 Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors Transmission line corridor vegetation maintenance and inspection records are maintained by the Asset Management Group of PPL Electric Utilities and are available Upon request. There were no adverse environmental impacts to transmission corridors reported in 2001. Records will be maintained for five years.

2.3 Cultural Resources Issues.

Environmental Protection Plan actions required to satisfy Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations Part 800, relating to archeological sites, were completed in 1987. The Advisory Council on Historic. Preservation (ACHP), in accordance with.36 CFR 800.6 (a)(1), approved the NRC's determination of "no adverse effect" for archeological- sites SES-3, SES-6, SES-8, and.SES-1 I located on the Licensee's property, (NRC letter dated October 28, 1987, to ACHP).."

As part of the determination of effect process, the Licensee committed to and is taking appropriate measures to mitigate impacts from plant maintenance and operation to sites SES-3, SES-6, SES-8 and SES-1 1.

There was.,no impact to-these sites from plant maintenance and operation in 2001.

2-3

REFERENCES 2.1-1 Restoration of American Shad to the Susquehanna River, Annual Progress Report-2001, Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish Restoration Committee, February 2002.

2-4

3.0 CONSISTENCY REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Plant Design and Operation In accordance with the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP), the Licensee shall prepare and record an environmental evaluation of proposed changes in plant design, operation, or performance of any test or experiment which may significantly affect the environment. Before initiating such activities, the Licensee shall provide a written evaluation and obtain prior approval from the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. Criteria for the need to perform an environmental evaluation include: (1) a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated by the NRC or Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, (2) a significant change in effluent or power level, or (3) a matter not previously evaluated which may have a significant adverse environmental impact.

The EPP requires that if an activity meets any of the criteria to perform an environmental evaluation, the NRC will be notified. If the change, test, or experiment does not meet any of these criteria, the Licensee will document the evaluation and allow the activity to occur.

During operation of the Susquehanna SES in 2001, there were three proposed activities that the Licensee reviewed as part of the unreviewed environmental question program. None of these three activities was determined to be an unreviewed environmental question or required NRC notification. These activities were:

1. There was a planned adjustment of Circulating Water System (CWS) pump seals to minimize river water leaks into the Circulating Water Pump House sump. This was needed to decrease the potential for exceeding the NPDES permit monthly average Total Suspended Solids (TSS) limit of 30 mg/I based on the first monthly sample. Repairs were made to stop the pump seals from leaking.

Additional samples were collected and the final monthly average was less than 30 mg/I, TSS limit. Therefore, there were no noncompliances or reporting requirements.

2. A request to place stones (riprap) on 1,200 feet of Lake Took-a while shoreline was evaluated. PPL received a GP-3 Bank Rehabilitation permit from the PaDEP and US Army Corps of Engineers (COE). The purpose of this activity was to minimize shoreline erosion.

3. There was a planned Neutralization Basin discharge containing some foam and a minimal amount of oil and grease to the station's 3-1

U1 II Sewage Treatment Plant for treatment, after consultation with the PaDEP. One liter of Betz Foamtrol 355 was used"t minimize foam coming from soap used by operators in an office sink in the Circulating Water Pump House.

3.2 Reporting Related to NPDES Permits and State Certifications There were no NPDES permit noncompliant sampling events in 2001.

Pennsylvania is an NPDES Permitting Agreement State with the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, therefore, state certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act is not required.

3.3 Changes Required for Compliance with Other Environmental Regulations Three air quality control permits were renewed. Also, a joint permit was obtained from the PaDEP and COE to place riprap along the shoreline of Lake Took-a-while. They were:

PERMIT NO.

Air Blasting Operation 40-399-024 "E" Emergency Diesel Generator 40-306-004 "A-D" Emergency Diesel Generators 40-306-005 GP-3 Bank Rehabiiitation GPO34001404/WL4001404 3-2

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events During' 2001,..10 operating occurrences were reviewed as part of the significant environmental event evaluation program. There were no signifi, nt oradverse environmental .effects cauýsed by these occurrences.

Ther& were no EPP noncompliances.

The 10 operating occurrences areas follows:

1.. .A Cooling Tower discharge sample for Free AvailablelChlorine (FAC) was not taken after Unit 1 biocide treatment prior to opening blowdown. A sample collected in the Circulating Water System

'after biocide injection was _<0.05 mg/I IFACa This result indicated that FAC was less than detectable in the system, and, therefore, less than detectable in the blowdown. No NPDES permit limits were exceeded.

2. A 12-volt vehicle battery dropped and broke on the Dry Fuel Storage concrete pad spilling approximately one gallon of sulfuric acid. This spill was contained and cleaned up on the concrete and none -reached soil surrounding the pad. The !quantity spilled was well below the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) reportable quantity (RQ) of 65 gallons.

3. Less than one gallon of sodium hypochlorite leaked from a cracked fitting on to the floor in the Well Water Pump House. The spill was cleaned up without discharging into the environment. The amount spilled was well below the CERCLA RQ of 79 gallons.

4. There was an overflow of clarified water from the Reactivator to the Clarifier Holdup sump. This sump was then discharged to the Neutralization Basin, NPDES Outfall 371. There was a concern that Outfall 371 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) limits of 30 mg/I monthly average and/or 100 mg/I maximum could be exceeded. This was not the case; the TSS monthly average and maximum were well below permit limits, and no noncompliance or special reporting other than the monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) was required.

5. River water leaked from the Unit 1 Cooling Tower valve pit into the environment. Water discharged through site drains to the Peach Stand Pond, NPDES Outfall 075. Miscellaneous leaks of river 4-1

water were described in the NPDES permit no. PA 0047325 application (December 6, 1999). There were no station or regulatory reporting requirements for this event.

6. Hydraulic oil teaked from a crarie being used near a spare auxiliary transformer. Less than five galkons of oil spilled on to the macadam in the vicinity of the transformers. The spill was contained and cleaned up prior to entering storm drains and no RQ requirements were exceeded.

7. Failure of the 'D' emergency diesel generator underground storage tank (USf) high level alarm occurred during transfer of fuel oil from the 'E' LIST. During this process less than 20 ga]loris of fuel spilled.

The spill was cleaned up from the pit surrounding the 'D' diesel generator UST. None of the fuel oil reached a waterway. Three drums of gravel and oil were collected for disposal offsite. This incident was not reportable.

8. Two to four ounces of sulfuric acid leaked from a flange on a portable acid tank during injection to the Unit 1 Cooling Tower basin. The flange was tightened and the acid injection was secured avoiding any additional leaks. The amount released did not exceed any RQ requirements.

9. An oil sheen appeared at a stormwater outlet near the North Gate House parking lot. The sheen was attributed to parking lot runoff from rains after an extended dry period and not from a spill.

Absorbent pads were placed on the stormwater outlet to absorb the sheen. A review of station procedures and spill regulations indicated that this was not a reportable event.

10. Maintenance activities identified an Asiatic clam (Corbicula fluminea) in the Unit 1 B High Pressure Coolant Injection System room cooler. The clam did not affect station operation or increase impact to the environment. Additional evaluation and monitoring of Emergency Service Water and other systems as appropriate are being undertaken to determine extent of clams at the station and necessary treatment.

4-2

4.2 Environmental Monitoring 4.2.1 General Monitoring With the exception of aquatic monitoring discussed in Section 2.1 of this report,ý .all other monitoring of station operational impacts on

.:ýaquatic and.terrestriaLtbiota.listed intheFES and Appendix B of the operating license has been% completed.ý 4.2.2 Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors In 2001, the Asset Management group of'PPL Electric Utilities maintained- transmission line vegetation maintenance and inspection records.

4-3

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Review and Audit The Licensee has established procedures for an independent group to review and audit compliance with the EPP. Audits of EPP compliance are conducted by Nuclear Assurance. The General Manager-Nuclear Assurance with support, as needed, from the Manager-Environmental Management Division is responsible for verifying compliance with the EPP. The Manager-Nuclear Technology is responsible for off-site environmental monitoring and for providing any related support concerning licensing. The Supervisor - Operations Technology manages day-to-day offsite monitoring through the Environmental Services group.

The General Manager - SSES is responsible for on-site environmental matters. The Auditing Chart (Fig. 5.1-1) lists the groups utilized in environmental reviewing and auditing of the Susquehanna SES environmental monitoring programs as well as those responsible for managing these programs.

There are periodic audits of the EPP program. An audit of the EPP (NAS/SRC Audit 2001-001) was conducted in 2001. There were no findings or recommendations reported.

5.2 Records Retention Records and logs relative to environmental aspects of plant operation and audit activities are retained in the Nuclear Records System. This system provides for a convenient review and inspection of environmental documents which are available to the NRC upon request.

All records concerning modifications of plant structures, systems and components which are determined to potentially affect the continued protection of the environment, are retained for the life of the plant. All other records, data, and logs relating to the environmental programs and monitoring are retained for at least five years or, where applicable, in accordance with the requirements of other agencies.

5.3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan No changes were made to the EPP during 2001.

5-1

II 5.4 Plant Reportinq Requirements 5.4.1 Routine Reports This Annual Environmental Operating Report (Nonradiological) was prepared to meet routine reporting requirements of the EPP for 2001. It provides summaries and analyses of environmental protection activities required in Subsection 4.2 of the EPP for the reporting period.

5.4.2 Nonroutine Reports There were no Unusual or Important Environmental Events as identified in the Environmental Protection Plan that required reporting in 2001.

5-2 A

6.0 ATTACHMENTS Exhibit I American Shad Impingement Letter Table 2.1-1 Shad Impingement Monitoring Program Figure 5.1-1 Auditing Organization Chart 6-1

F EXHIBIT 1 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Susquehanna River Coordinator 1721 North Front Street, Room 105 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17102 RECEIVED July 5,2001

. JUL 0 2001 MEMORANDUM I. I ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES TO: Jerome Fields, PP&L, Allentown, PA FROM: Dick St. Pierre, Susquehanna River Coordinator, USFWS, Harrisburg, PA

SUBJECT:

Juvenile Shad Monitoring at Susquehanna SES Conowingo Dam In spring 2001 the adult American shad return to the Susquehanna River passing through the East lift was a record 193,574 fish. Holtwood and Safe Harbor lifts also passed record 8 and passed numbers of shad. York Haven's fishway operated every day from May 3 through June 16,200 shad upstream.

a several With unusually low river flows this spring, the inflatable dam at Sunbury was erected over below the Sunbury Dam using day period in mid-May. Wedid collect several dozen American shad anglers catching and electrofishing in May and June and, as was the case last year, we heard of Commission stocked releasing shad below the dam at Sunbury. The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat their Van Dyke 677,000 larval shad into the North Branch Susquehanna at Tunkhannock from hatchery in mid-June.

between York Haven and Because of the fabridam inflation schedule and the travel time and distance passed the Sunbury dam Sunbury it is unlikely that very many adult shad (i.e. spawners) successfully at Tunkhannock survived site in spring 2001. However, we learned last year that shad larvae stocked collection and grew well, comprising over 14% of all hatchery juvenile recoveries at downstream Holtwood forebay in late sites. These fish appeared at York Haven forebay in mid- to late October, in late November and early October through November, and at Peach Bottom and Conowingo system, shad stocked in the December. Relative to total numbers of larvae stocked throughout the North Branch survived better than at all other locations.

cooling water intake All hatchery produced shad stocked at Tunkhannock are expected to pass the Therefore, I request site at Susquehanna SES during August-September at a size of about 3-4 inches.

shad, at least on that you initiate screen-wash sampling and record keeping for juvenile American a weekly basis during that two month period.

Please call if you have any questions or concerns.

cc: Ted JacoDbsn

TABLE 2.1-1 PROGRAM 2001 SHAD IMPINGEMENT MONITORING Crayfish Other Shad Fish Leaves and debris 11Sep 1330 0 0o 1341 channel catfish, h rock bas"s 0 Leaves and debris 12Sep

--- 0 Leaves and debris 13Sep 1350 0 0 1 Leaves and debris 14 Sep 1415 0 1 rock bass 0 Leaves and debris 15 S 153 0 0 1 Leaves and debris 16 Sep 725 -0 2 channel catfish

-- 3 Leaves and debris 0 1 channel catfish ---' Leaves and debris--

Leaves and debris 17 Sep 18Se e 1430 1444-0" 00 "10-channel catfish -'------

- "1 channel catfish 1 Leaves and debrs 20Sp 1300 0 " Leaves and debris 1S 1400 0 0 1 'Leaves and debris 22Sep-1300-0-00 0 " Leaves and debris 24Sep 0745 0 0 Q Leaves and debris 20S 133an 0 0 Leaves and debris 26 Sep 1400 0 0 1 channel catfish, bluegill 0 Leaves and debris 27 1 0 03 bluegill, smailmouth bass Leaves and debris 2Sep 0 0 Leaves and debris 2 Sep F1 33 0 Leaves and debrs 0 1400

• oSe 301 rock bass - - Leaves and debris Ot 19Sep 1345 1330 00 . 0 Leaves and debris 0 Leaves and debris 3Oct 1300 0 0 Leaves and debris 4-Oct 1400 0 0 rock bass --- 0 Leaves and debris Leaves debi 6"5Oct Oc 1415 150 0 1 bluegill

"---' 0 Leaves and debi 70Oc 101"--' 0 "0 S* * " ---- '-- Leaves and. debd-"*

0 Leaves and debris 10 acti 0800 0 0 0-- Leaves~and debris' F

11 O--- 090"-' 0 1 rock bass ct !_ -L1 Leaves and debris 0 1_La.ea..deri 13 Oct 1300 0 0 "Leavesand debris 14 O-ct- 1400 .0 0

- 'o-- Leaves and debris 15 Oct 134---5 0 0 0- Leaves and ebi 16 Oct 1345 10 1i0 9

"TALTC7 chtann~elcatfishh, 55 rock bass,1

• smallmouth bass, 5 blue.._

FIGURE 5.1-1 AUDITING CHART (2001)

I Sr. Vice President &

Chief Nuclear Officer esident General Manager Manager lear Nuclear Assurance --------- Environmental erations Management General Manager Nuclear Engineering