PLA-7312, Annual Environmental Operating Report (Non-Radiological)
| ML15112A812 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 04/22/2015 |
| From: | Franke J Susquehanna |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| PLA-7312 | |
| Download: ML15112A812 (23) | |
Text
APR 2! 2015 Jon A. Franke Site Vice President U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Boulevard Berwick, PA 18603 Tel. 570.542.2904 Fax 570.542.1504 jfranke@pplweb.com SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL)
PLA-7312 Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388 The Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES) Annual Environmental Operating Report (Non-Radiological) is hereby submitted for the calendar year 2014 in accordance with the SSES Environmental Protection Plan (EPP).
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Jeffery Grisewood, Manager-Nuclear Regulatory Affairs at (570) 542-1330.
This letter contaiJ?.s no new regulatory commitments. ) 2014 Annual Environmental Operating Report (Non-Radiological)
Copy: NRC Region I Ms. C. Copeyon, U. S. Dept. of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Mr. J. E. Greives, NRC Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. J. A. Whited, NRC Project Manager Mr. L. J. Winker, PA DEP/BRP TM to PLA-7312 2014 Annual Environmental Operating Report (Non-Radiological)
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Units 1 & 2 Environmental Operating Report (N onradiological)
-~~~~~ 2014 Annual Qport
2014 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NONRADIOLOGICAL)
PPL Susquehanna, LLC Berwick, PA April 2015
A~JIT\\ij\\lBA ~-=*
[E:U\\BV~~())NM~ u\\lifi~~t (f) Uj)ElRAu~~G lRE~O~l'
((~J 0 ~
~~[))
~ © llJrJ G ~ CCAtp gcr]*u &TI.
Prepared by:
Jerrold L. McCormick Sr. Environmental Scientist Approved by:
Robert J. Ff annsen Plant General Manager - Nuclear Date:
Date:
- ' */, I,,
.: /
j"i.l /.::.*
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Units 1 & 2 2014 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON RADIOLOGICAL)
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-14 & NPF-22 Docket Nos. 50-387 & 50-388 Prepared by Chemistry-Environmental Services PPL Susquehanna, LLC Berwick, PA April2015
FOREWORD PPL's Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES) is a nuclear electrical generating facility with two boiling-water reactors and generators located just west of the Susquehanna River, approximately 5 miles northeast of Berwick, in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. The station was constructed in the 1970's, with Unit 1 beginning commercial operation on June 8, 1983, and Unit 2 beginning commercial operation on February 12, 1985. Units 1 and 2 each generate a net 1,350 megawatts (MWe), for a total station output of 2,700 MWe.
In total PPL Susquehanna, LLC presently owns 2,347 acres of land on both sides of the Susquehanna River. Generally, this land is characterized by open deciduous woodlands interspersed with grasslands and orchards.
On the west side of the river, 1,605 (1670 minus 65 acre Gould Island) acres of land is jointly owned between PPL Susquehanna, LLC (90%) and Allegheny Electric Cooperative (1 0%). The land uses on the west side of the river include generation &
associated maintenance facilities, laydown areas, parking lots, roads, a nature preserve (the Susquehanna Riverlands), and agricultural leases to local farmers.
To the north of the Station along the river, PPL Susquehanna, LLC owns 100% of the 65-acre Gould Island. On the east side of the river, and across the river from the Station, PPL Susquehanna, LLC is the 100% owner of 677 acres that are maintained as undeveloped land, natural recreational areas, wildlife areas, and leases to local farmers.
This report discusses environmental commitments and impacts from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. In summary it documents that environmental commitments were met and that there was no significant adverse environmental impact from station operation.
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Foreword Table of Contents 1.0 OBJECTIVE 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 2.1 Aquatic Issues 2.2 Terrestriallssues 2.2.1 Studies Previously Completed 2.2.2 Sound Level Survey 2.2.3 Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors 2.3 Cultural Resources Issues 3.0 CONSISTENCY REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Plant Design and Operation 3.2 Reporting Related to NPDES Permits and State Certifications 3.3 Changes Required for Compliance with other Environmental Regulations 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events 4.2 Environmental Monitoring 4.2.1 General Monitoring 4.2.2 Maintenance of Transmission Lirie Corridors ii PAGE NO.
ii 1-1 2-1 2-1 2-2 2-2 2-2 2-2 2-3 3-1 3-1 3-2 3-2 4-1 4-1 4-1 4-1 4-1
SECTION PAGE NO.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 5-1 5.1 Review and Audit 5.2 Records Retention 5.3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan 5.4 Plant Reporting Requirements 5.4.1 Routine Reports 5.4.2 Nonroutine Reports 6.0 ATTACHMENTS Table 2.1-1 American Shad Impingement Monitoring (2014)
Figure 5.1-1 Auditing Organization Chart (2014) iii 5-1 5-1 5-2 5-2 5-2 5-2 6-1 6-2 6-3
1.0 OBJECTIVE The Licensee has developed procedures and guidelines to ensure that operation of Susquehanna SES does not adversely affect the environment in the vicinity of the station. Also, these procedures allocate responsibilities and define interfaces necessary to monitor environmental impacts. They include coordination of U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements with other federal, state, and local requirements for environmental protection.
The objective of this 2014 Annual Environmental Operating Report (Nonradiological) is to provide a summary of both environmental programs and procedures. This report is required by the Final Environmental Statement (FES) for the operation of the Susquehanna SES, Unit 1 and 2, NUREG-0564 June 1981, and Appendix 8-Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) to Operating Licenses No. NPF-14 and No. NPF-22. The 2014 report is the 33r Annual Environmental Operating Report (Nonradiological) submitted to meet EPP requirements.
The Licensee submitted an Environmental Report-Operating License Stage for Susquehanna SES to the NRC in May 1978. This report reviewed the results of the preoperational environmental programs and described the preoperational and proposed operational environmental monitoring programs. The NRC and other agencies reviewed this report and made recommendations for operational environmental monitoring programs which were listed in the FES.
1-1
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 2.1 Aquatic Issues The aquatic monitoring program for operation of the Susquehanna SES is divided into two parts. Part 1 includes effluent monitoring required by a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PaDEP).
Monthly discharge monitoring reports are submitted to the PaDEP as part of the permitting requirements. The station's operational NPDES permit No. PA-0047325 was reissued on September 1, 2011, and currently expires on August 31, 2016. Part 2 of the aquatic monitoring program deals with programs listed in the FES or recommended by the PaDEP or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
The PaDEP is responsible for regulating the water quality permit for the Susquehanna SES. The NPDES permit deals with discharge parameters for the Susquehanna SES Sewage Treatment Plant, Cooling Tower blowdown, and miscellaneous low volume waste discharges. The Cooling Tower blowdown also includes in-plant process streams which discharge to the Susquehanna River. Various low volume waste sumps discharge to the station's stormwater system, which flows into Lake Took-A-While, and eventually into the Susquehanna River. A copy of the permit renewal application was provided to the NRC in 2010. (PLA-6606, March 26, 2010)
American Shad Joshua Tryninewski, fisheries biologist with the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PAFBC), notified Ecology Ill personnel on 2 June, 2014, that 308,800 American shad (A/osa sapidissima) fry were stocked in the Susquehanna River at Tunkhannock, PA. The stocking occurred at the Tunkhannock Park Boat Access, approximately 50 miles upriver from the Susquehanna SES. As a result, the wash-water from the trash bars and traveling screens was sampled at the intake building to determine if any shad migrating downriver were impinged.
Fish sampling containers (wooden-framed boxes sided with wire mesh) were located at the ends of each of the wash-water canals from the trash bars and traveling screens. The sampling containers were deployed from 7 August through 30 September. No American shad were collected during this period or during any previous sampling year. However, 122 fish of 10 other species were collected {Table 2.1-1). Most of these fish were juvenile channel catfish or smallmouth bass. Additionally, 173 Allegheny crayfish (Orconectes obscurus) were also collected, along with two yellow 2-1
lampmussels (Lampsi/is cariosa) and one hellgrammite (Coryda/us cornutus).
It is possible that the location of the River Intake building deters migrating juvenile shad from approaching the intake. PAFBC personnel reported that juvenile shad avoid slow currents when migrating downriver. The intake structure is located on the west river bank in relatively slow current; therefore, the position of the intake could be a determining factor in not having observed American shad in any samples to date.
Biofouling Mollusk Monitoring The biofouling mollusk monitoring program continued at the Susquehanna SES in 2014. The focus of this monitoring is to survey the Susquehanna River and the ESSW Spray Pond for the presence of live Asian Clams and Zebra Mussels. This work is generally done by a combination of scuba diving, wading, and examination of removed structures so that substrates in the river and the pond can be inspected.
Asian clams are now abundant in the Susquehanna River near the Susquehanna SES, but no zebra mussels have yet been observed in the river in the immediate vicinity of the plant. There have been reports of a few zebra mussels observed in areas along the river, including an island a couple of miles below the plant, but none of these observations yet suggest an established adult population.
Unlike previous years, none of the ESSW pump house screens were removed this year for cleaning; therefore, these substrates were not inspeCted for zebra mussels. A scuba inspection for biofoulers present in the ESSW Spray Pond was done on 14 July 2014 by Ecology Ill divers; however, no living biofoulers were observed.
Since the scuba inspection did not detect the presence of biofoulers, the station did not conduct a biocide treatment of the Spray Pond in 2014.
2.2 Terrestrial Issues 2.2.1 Studies Previously Completed Terrestrial environmental studies including Cooling Tower bird impaction were completed prior to 1989.
2-2
2.2.2 Sound Level Survey Sound level surveys were conducted during pre-operation and operational periods and are completed. There were no noise complaints received during 2014.
2.2.3 Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors Transmission line corridor vegetation maintenance and inspection records are maintained by PPL-EU Vegetation Management and are available upon request. There were no adverse environmental impacts to transmission corridors reported in 2014. Records will be maintained for five years.
2.3 Cultural Resources Issues Environmental Protection Plan actions required to satisfy Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations Part 800, relating to archeological sites, were completed in 1987. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), in accordance with 36 CFR 800.6 (a)(1), approved the NRC's determination of "no adverse effect" for archeological sites SES-3 (36LU15), SES-6 (36LU16), SES-8 (36LU49), and SES-11 (36LU51) located on the Licensee's property (NRC letter dated October 28, 1987, to ACHP).
As part of the determination-of-effect process, the Licensee committed to and is taking appropriate measures to mitigate impacts from plant maintenance and operation to sites 36LU15, 36LU16, 36LU49, 36LU51, and 36LU43. There was no impact to these sites from plant maintenance and operation in 2014. Furthermore, station activities did not impact any previously unknown cultural resources in 2014.
2-3
3.0 3.1 CONSISTENCY REQUIREMENTS Plant Design and Operation In accordance with the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP), the Licensee shall prepare and record an environmental evaluation of proposed changes in plant design, operation, or performance of any test or experiment which may significantly affect the environment. Before initiating such activities, the Licensee shall provide a written evaluation and obtain prior approval from the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. Criteria for the need to perform an environmental evaluation include: (1) a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated by the NRC or Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, (2) a significant change in effluent or power level, or (3) a matter not previously evaluated which may have a significant adverse environmental impact.
The EPP requires that if an activity meets any of the criteria to perform an environmental evaluation, the NRC will be notified. If the change, test, or experiment does not meet any of these criteria, the Licensee will document the evaluation and allow the activity to occur.
During operation of the Susquehanna SES in 2014, there were proposed activities that the Licensee reviewed as part of the Unreviewed Environmental Question program. None of these activities were determined to involve an Unreviewed Environmental Question or require prior NRC notification. The activities reviewed were:
- 1.
Construction of Flex Building
- 2.
Buried Pipe Inspection program Excavations I Inspections
- 3.
Tree Removals to Support Stormwater Maintenance
- 4.
2014 Paving Projects
- 5.
River lntak.e Structure Gate
- 6.
500 kV Yard Perimeter Fence Replacement Project
- 7.
Fire Protection System Modification
- 8.
Flex Building Utility Tie-ins
- 9.
West Bldg. Parking Lot Repairs
- 10.
New Pavement at Base of Security Tower 4
- 11.
Paving in South Gatehouse Egress Lane
- 12.
Installation of Temporary Security Cameras
- 13.
Excavation & Repair of Septic System Leaks 3-1
3.2 Reporting Related to NPDES Permits and State Certifications On 12/17/14 the station discovered leaks from a portion of buried septic line located offsite on PPL property, running between the PPL Susquehanna Environmental Lab and the station's Sewage Treatment Plant. As required by the station's NPDES Permit, PaDEP was immediately notified. Additionally, a 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> ENS notification to the NRC was made, and the station provided written notifications to the PaDEP (PLE-25589, PLE-25607) and to the NRC (PLA-7277). These leaks were repaired. NOTE: This event did not release any sewage into a waterway; therefore, a Significant Environmental Event Evaluation was not required.
There were no other significant noncompliances or special reporting requirements associated with implementation of NPDES Permit No.
PA0047325.
The Susquehanna SES has an NPDES permit; therefore, state certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act is not required.
3.3 Changes Required for Compliance with Other Environmental Regulations PERMIT NO.
Air; GP-11 General Plan Approval for one 1,093 bhp Diesel Generator to support Supplemental Decay Heat GP-11-40-004 Removal Air; GP-11 General Plan Approval for six temporary
- diesel fired gen sets: (4) 316 bhp gen sets, (1) 165 bhp gen set, and (1) 36 bhp gen set.
GP-11-40-006 These gen sets were intended to provide temporary power for a contingency Sequester Area.
Township and County Permits were issued during the year to support the construction of the station's new Flex Building.
3-2
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events During 2014 there were two operating occurrences reviewed as part of the Significant Environmental Event evaluation program. Both Significant Environmental Event reviews were initiated to document evaluations prior to and following the removal of trees I branches located on SSES property that were determined to pose a safety risk to station personnel between April 1st and November 15th.
In the first case, a qualified biologist determined that trees in question qualified as Indiana bat habitat; therefore, the station contacted the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to obtain authorization prior to removing the trees.
In the second case, a qualified biologist determined that the fallen branch in question did not qualify as Indiana bat habitat; therefore, USFWS authorization was not required to remove the branch in question.
In both cases a qualified biologist inspected the impacted areas after the tree and branch removals and determined that the removals were completed without negatively impacting an Indiana bat; therefore, there were no significant or adverse environmental effects related to station operation and there were no EPP noncompliances.
4.2 Environmental Monitoring 4.2.1 General Monitoring With the exception of ongoing aquatic monitoring required for compliance with the NPDES permit, all monitoring of station operational impacts on aquatic and terrestrial biota listed in the FES and Appendix B of the operating license have been completed.
4.2.2 Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors In 2014, PPL EU Vegetation Management maintained transmission line vegetation maintenance and inspection records.
4-1
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Review and Audit The Licensee has established procedures for an independent group to review and audit compliance with the EPP. Audits of EPP compliance are conducted by Quality Assurance. The Manager-Quality Assurance is responsible for verifying compliance with the EPP. The Site VP -
Susquehanna is responsible for environmental monitoring and for providing any related support concerning licensing. The Manager-Plant Chemistry I Environmental is responsible for day-to-day environmental monitoring.
The Auditing Organization Chart (Fig. 5.1-1) lists the groups utilized in reviewing and auditing of the Susquehanna SES environmental programs as well as those responsible for managing these programs. PPL's Senior Director of Environmental Management is available to provide auditing support as necessary.
An audit of compliance with the EPP program was conducted during 2014 as part of a regularly scheduled Chemistry Program Audit. There were no findings or non compliances identified as a result of this effort. The program was determined to be effective and well implemented.
5.2 Records Retention Records and logs relative to environmental aspects of plant operation and audit activities are retained in the Nuclear Records System. This system provides for review and inspection of environmental documents, which are available to the NRC upon request.
All records concerning modifications of plant structures, systems, and components which are determined to potentially affect the continued protection of the environment are retained for the life of the plant. All other records, data, and logs relating to the environmental programs and monitoring are retained for at least five years or, where applicable, in accordance with the requirements of other agencies. Transmission line corridor vegetation maintenance records are maintained by PPL Electrical Utilities per section 2.2.3 of this report.
5-1
5.3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan No changes were made to the EPP during 2014.
5.4 Plant Reporting Requirements 5.4.1 Routine Reports This Annual Environmental Operating Report (Nonradiological) was prepared to meet routine reporting requirements of the EPP for 2014. It provides summaries and analyses of environmental protection activities required in Subsection 4.2 of the EPP for the reporting period.
5.4.2 Nonroutine Reports As identified previously under Section 3.2, the discovery of leaks from the station's buried septic line located offsite on PPL property required a non-routine immediate phone notification to PaDEP, a 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> ENS notification to the NRC, and formal written notifications to PaDEP (PLE-25589, PLE-25607) and to the NRC (PLA-7277).
Otherwise, there were no Unusual or Important Environmental Events as defined by the Environmental Protection Plan that required reporting in 2014.
5-2
6.0 ATTACHMENTS Table2.1-1 America Shad Impingement Monitoring (2014)
Figure 5.1-1 Auditing Organization Chart (2014) 6-1
TABLE 2.1-1 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 2014 AMERICAN SHAD IMPINGEMENT PROGRAM 7 August-30 September 2014
~ ;)-.--~
.. ~~:-:-:-~-: -::-~u.::T~4T~~:':ry--:.*~r;~~-~-
- e;;.,,..~_:........ ~~rr~~~-:;.:- ~:: :~ ""'t:.:f".~-.. * ";r,:r-.~ -
I" ~~ ~
- -~.. ::..:..~
... ;o.:~t ~';'.~*
~.. ~--::;-~*... -.. *;~~
~- ~\\~P;.,.*.J. r.1.~.::; :' *: ".,. ::~.,.:* **:*,,~ _l.(.::f,;.t~.:: *. ~".:PJ"\\.. ?..~ :'i, ~q;,"=::!~-~!.::;~t~~ - ~~- !A2.l.! ~-,.. ;.;;;. ~.0 :l~'\\,1.*.. **,.
. :***.. ;~
..::..-...;.:.:..""'-'-.0......*~~
.. ""'"'~-'"'*"-*-'-'* **-=**.:.-.-"---~- =-::.;.;." _~~...........;;;.._~----*--., "'-T...;....__....,_~ ---~
1 2014 I Shad I Fish Crayfish j Other 1
Comments 7 Aug I 1630 Baskets installed. Operational status uncertain.
I 8Aug J1620 Water flow restored.
I I 9 Aug
~1700 0
0 I
1 l
10 Aug 1245 0
0 0
I Debris
~1 AuQT 1145 0
I 1 smallmouth bass I
0 I Debris 112 Aug
' 1115 I 0
1 channel catfish I
0 I
Basket lost in I
traveling screen 11 3 Aug I Baskets not checked.
!1 4Aug~OOO l 0
l O---- --.,---O-__l-,------*
11 5 Aug_j Baskets out of service -for maintenance.
1 16 Aug J
L ____
--11 I
Debris l
I I
J1400
--.-----~-
J 17 Aug Baskets replaced.
18 Aug 0900 I
0 1 channel catfish 3
I Debris 1 smallmouth bass I
1 spotfin shiner I
1 margined madtom I 1
19 Aug 11730 0
12 channel catfish 1
I Heavy debris 2 smallmouth bass l 2o Aug 11700 I 0
11 smallmouth bass I 1
I Heavy debris I
I 1 spotfin shiner 21 Aug 1630 0
11 channel catfish I
4
! Debris 22Aug J1430 I
0 0
I 2
Heavy debris 23Aug 11000 I 0
1 channel catfish 3
Heavy debris J24 Aug J1700 I 0
0 I
3 Heavy debris 125 Aug 11730 I 0
3 channel catfish I
2 I
Heavy debris 126Aug 171 3 smallmouth bass I
0 u common carp 1
2 Heavy debris 3 channel catfish yellow b
900 2 smallmouth bass lampmussels I
0 12 smallmouth bass I
1 1 hellgrammite Heavy debris I
1 bluegill I
I 28Aug
/ 1930
~-0 1 smallmouth bass 2
Heavy debris 29Aug
/ 1000 011 bluegill I
2 Heavy debris 30Aug 1030 0
1 channel catfish 4
Heavy debris 1 smallmouth bass 31 Aug 0800 0
2 channel catfish 6
Heavy debris 1 smallmouth bass 6-2
TABLE 2.1.1 (cont.)
L'-1~S_e_p __ ~1~1~0-0--r---0--~-2--ch_a_n_n_e_lc_a_~~is_h ____ l ___ 1_o __ ~,---~~avydeb-ri~s-----~
1 smallmouth bass 1-2--,-S_ep ___ -+-! _08_3_0 __ +-l ___ o ___ --;1 3 channel ca~ish I
6 I
eavy debris 3 Sep I 1 030 I 0
I 1 channel ca~ish I
5 I
Heavy debris 1 4 Sep
! 1930 0
4 channel catfish 9
Heavy debris I
2 smallmouth bass 1 spottail shiner I
I 1 030 0
4 channel catfish I
9 I
I Heavy debris 2 smallmouth bass 1-----*-ll _____
.+-
1 _____
,,.... 1 walleye
_j'------+----------+--------------1 6 Sep 1 030 0
15 channel ca~ish I
8 I
I Heavy debris I
1 margined madtom I j
5 Sep 7 Sep 1 8 Sep 11 030 i 0
i 1 channel catfish i
6 J
Heavy debris
~~ 16 Sep 1
1 1800 I 0
13 channel catfish 6
I I Debris 1 smallmouth bass I
11 bluegill I
t
~
i! 0845 0
! 3 channel ca~ish 3
1 Debris
- I 11 smallmouth bass I
1 spottail shiner
+-------+---------~-----------------
1 18 Sep 11930 I'
0 1 channel catfish 7
J I Debris I
1 smallmouth bass I
i I
! 1 shiner spp.
119 Sep I 1930 j
0 I 1 smallmouth bass I
3
~
I Debris 120 Sep 11 050 -~
0 I 1 channel catfish 1
1 4
f,.-=D=-e*-=-b-r.,-is __________ 1
'---~----~~-1_ bl_u_eg_il_l ___
l_ ________ ~-----~
6-2
TABLE 2.1.1 (cont.)
Date Time Items Found on Trash Bar/Traveling Screen 2014 Shad Fish 21 Sep 1645 0
1 channel catfish 1 bluegill 22 Sep 1100 0
0 23 Sep 1015 0
0 24 Sep 1000 0
1 channel catfish 25 Sep 1000 0
3 channel catfish 26 Sep 1000 0
0 27 Sep 1100 0
1 channel catfish 28 Sep 1630 0
2 rock bass 1 bluegill 29 Sep 1000 0
1 rock bass 30 Sep 1730 0
1 smallmouth bass 1 rock bass 30 Sep Baskets removed.
TOTALS 0
122 fish -10 species 69 channel catfish 30 smallmouth bass 6 bluegill 4 rock bass 3 spotfin shiner 3 spottail shiner 3 margined madtom 1 pumpkinseed 1 common carp 1 walleye 1 shiner spp.
- All crayfish collected were Orconectes obscurus.
6-2 Crayfish Other 3
1 3
3 1
1 3
5 3
1 173*
3 2 yellow lampmussels 1 hellgrammite Comments Heavy debris Heavy debris Heavy debris causing water overflow Heavy debris causing water overflow Heavy debris causing water overflow Heavy debris causing water overflow Heavy debris causing water overflow Heavy debris causing water overflow Heavy debris causing water overflow Heavy debris causing water overflow
FIGURE 5.1-1 AUDITING ORGANIZATION CHART (2014) l Manager-Sr. Vice-President &
Chief Nuclear Officer Sr. Director-Env.
1---------1 --------------
Mgmt (Auditing Quality Assurance Support as needed)
Site VP-Susquehanna Plant General Manager-Nuclear Nuclear GM-Operations Manager-Plant Chemistry I Environmental Chemistry Environmental Services 6-2