ML15177A033
ML15177A033 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Susquehanna |
Issue date: | 04/28/2015 |
From: | D'Angelo D R, Hickey F J, Miller D W Susquehanna |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
Shared Package | |
ML15177A023 | List: |
References | |
PLA-7322 | |
Download: ML15177A033 (91) | |
Text
Attahiment I to PLA=7322 Raioactive Effluent Rees 1Reporft for SSES UJnfts I ~an 2 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT REPORT PERIOD: 01/01/14 -12I31/14 Prepared by: Francis J. Health Physicist Reviewed by: Daniel W. Miller Chemistry Support Supervisor Approved by: PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Blvd.Berwick, Pennsylvania 18603 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. Introduction, Summary and Supplemental Information 1-1 2. Effluent and Waste Disposal Data 2-1 3. Meteorological Data and Dispersion Estimates 3-1 4. Dose Measurements and Assessments 4-1 5. Changes to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), 5-1 Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) and the Solid Radioactive Waste Process Control Program 6. Miscellaneous Technical Requirements Manual (TRM), FSAR, 6-1 40CFR190 and NEI Groundwater Protection Initiative Reporting 7. Corrections to Previous Radioactive Effluent Release Reports 7-1 8. Effluent from Systems Classified as Insignificant Effluent Pathways 8-1 Appendix A ODCM/TRM LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-2 Table 2-3 Table 2-4 Table 2-5 Table 2-6 Table 2-7 Table 2-8 Table 2-9 Table 2-10 Table 2-11 Table 2-12 Table 2-13 Technical Requirement Limits Airborne Effluent -Summation of All Releases Airborne Effluent -Radionuclides Released Waterborne Effluent -Summation of All Releases Waterborne Effluent -Radionuclides Released Estimated Total Errors Associated with Effluents Measurements Waste Disposition' Contaminated Waste Oil -Class A Fuel Blending for Co-Generation Condensate Demineralizer/Radwaste Demineralizer Class A HIC (Pyrolysis)
Processed DAW -Class A HIC (Compacted)
Processed DAW -Class A HIC (Non-Processed)
Liquid Radwaste Filter Media -Class A HIC (Pyrolysis)
Processed DAW -Class A Strong Tight Container (Compacted)
Processed DAW -Class A Strong Tight Container (Compacted)
PAGE 1-10 2-4 2-5 2-8 2-9 2-12 2-15 2-16 2-17 2-18 2-19 2-20 2-21 2-22 LIST OF TABLES (cont.)PAGE Table 3-1 Meteorological Data Recovery for 2014 3-3 3-4 Table 3-2 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Speed and Wind Direction 10m versus Delta Temperature 60-1 Om for the.Period of January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 Table 3-3 Table 3-4 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Speed and Wind Direction 60m versus Delta Temperature 60-1 Cm for the Period of January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 2014 SSES Annual Relative Concentrations No Decay, Undepleted X/Q (sec/m 3)Table 3-5 2014 SSES Annual Relative Concentrations 2.26-Day Decay, Undepleted X/Q (sec/m 3)Table 3-6 2014 SSES Annual Relative Concentrations 8-Day Decay, Depleted X/Q (sec/m 3)3-12 3-20 3-21 3-22 3-23 3-24 4-2 Table 3-7 2014 SSES Annual Relative Deposition (D/Q meters-2)Table 3-8 2014 Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates for RETDAS Input at Selected Locations Table 4-1 Site-Specific Parameters Used for RETDAS Calculations (Danville Receiver) for 2014 Table 4-2 Table 4-3 Summary of Maximum Individual Doses to Members of the Public Data Period: 1/1/14 to 12/31/14 Calculated Collective Doses to Members of the Public Within the Riverlands/Energy Information Center Complex Data Period: 1/1/14 to 12/31/14 4-5 4-6 Table 4-4 Summary of Maximum Individual Doses from Airborne Effluent 4-6 Table 6-1 NEI Ground Water Protection Initiative Reporting 6-4 Table 8-1 Annual Release from Systems Classified as 8-3 Insignificant Effluent Pathways LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Figure 1-2 Figure 2-1 Figure 2-2 Figure 3-1 Figure 3-2 Figure 3-3 Figure 4-1 Figure 6-1 Airborne Effluent Release Points Waterborne Effluent Pathway Susquehanna River Monthly Average Flow Rates Data Period: 2014 Monthly Liquid Radwaste Discharge Totals 2014 Annual Wind Rose IOM Level -Primary Tower 2014 Annual Wind Rose 60M Level -Primary Tower Pasquil Stability Class Prevalences Data Period: 2014 -Airborne-Dose Calculation Locations SSES Tritium Effluent Releases PAGE 1-6 1-7 2-10 2-11 3-26 3-27 3-28 4-7 6-5 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION,
SUMMARY
AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1-1 INTRODUCTION The submittal of the 2014 Radioactive Effluent Release Report is in accordance with PPL Susquehanna, LLC Tech Spec. 5.6.3. The enclosed information is consistent with the objectives outlined in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) and Process Control Program (PCP). The 2014 Radioactive Effluent Release Report is in conformance with 1OCFR50.36a and 10CFR50, Appendix I, Section IV.B.1.PPL Susquehanna, LLC is located in Salem Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania.
It is on the west bank of the Susquehanna River, 8 km northeast of Berwick. The station consists of two boiling water reactor generating units. Each unit has completed an Extended Power Uprate process which has increased licensed thermal power from 3489 MWt (megawatt thermal) to 3952 MWt. Unit-1 completed the power uprate in 2010 and Unit 2 completed the power uprate in 2011. The reactor and generating units were supplied by General Electric, while the Bechtel Corporation served as architect-engineer and constructor.
Construction of the Station began in the early 1970s. Fuel load began in Unit 1 in July of 1982. Initial criticality was achieved in the Unit I reactor on September 10, 1982.The reactor reached 100% power for the first time on February 4, 1983. Commercial operation of Unit I was declared on June 8, 1983. Initial criticality of Unit 2 occurred on May 8, 1984. Unit 2 was declared commercial on February 12, 1985.Airborne effluents are released from the Station via five rooftop Vents on the reactor building (see Figure 1-1). Continuous sampling for particulates and iodines is performed at each vent as well as continuous monitoring for noble gases. A program of periodic sampling and analysis for tritium and noble gases along with periodic analysis of particulate and iodine samples is conducted as specified in the plant Technical Requirements.
All waterborne effluents are released in batch mode and are sampled and analyzed prior to release. Waterborne effluents from the site are released into the cooling tower blowdown line for dilution prior to release to the Susquehanna River (see Figure 1-2). Blowdown line flow rates are at least 5,000 gpm during periods of liquid radwaste release. The diluted effluent is introduced to the river by way of a perforated diffuser pipe placed on the river bed. The diffuser serves to mix the station discharge with the main flow of the river.This report presents a summary of the quantities of radioactive materials which were released from the Station during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. In addition, this report serves as a medium for notifying the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff of changes to the ODCM, PCP and documentation of any exceptions to the effluent monitoring program which must be reported per Technical Requirements.
Airborne and waterborne radioactive effluent releases to the environment during the report period were sampled and analyzed in accordance with the Technical 1-2 Requirements.
All radioactive effluent releases were within the concentration and release limits specified in the Technical Requirements.
Calculations and terms utilized in this report are those outlined in the ODCM.Section 1 contains supplemental information pertaining to effluents from the Susquehanna plant. Included are regulatory limits (Table 1-1), sampling and analysis methods, characterization of the number and duration of batch and abnormal releases and a brief summary of the applicable year's effluents.
Section 2 contains effluent and waste disposal data for the report period. Table 2-1 contains a summation of all airborne releases, grouped into the radipnuclide categories of gases, particulates, iodines, and tritium. Average release rates are presented and compared to the applicable limits. Table 2-2 presents the activity totals of specific radionuclides in airborne effluents.
Waterborne effluents are summarized in Table 2-3. Average diluted concentrations are presented and compared to the applicable limits. Table 2-4 presents the release quantities of specific radionuclides in waterborne effluents over the report period.Figures 2-1 and 2-2 present the Susquehanna River Monthly Average Flow Rates for 2014 and the Monthly Liquid Radwaste Discharge Totals for 2014, respectively.
Table 2-5 contains estimates of the errors associated with the measurements involved in quantifying effluents.
Sampling errors, counting errors, and errors associated with S determining effluent flow rates and volumes all contribute to the total error of effluent measurements.
Error estimates are presented for each category of radionuclide detected in airborne and waterborne effluents and solid wastes during the report period (Error Analysis of the Radioactive Effluent Sampling and Analysis Program at the SSES, Hydro Nuclear Services; 1985).Tables 2-7 through 2-14 present a characterization of the solid radioactive waste shipped offsite during the report period. An estimate of major nuclide composition is presented for each waste type. Also included are the volumes and curie contents associated with each type of solid waste. The number of waste shipments from the site transported directly for burial or disposal are listed in Table 2-6.Section 3 presents meteorological data for 2014, including data recovery, joint frequency distribution of wind speed and direction, stability class distribution, and atmospheric dispersion estimates for selected locations.
Section 4 of this report contains an assessment of the calculated doses attributed to the reported radiological effluents for the calendar year. The Radioactive Effluent Tracking and Dose Assessment Software (RETDAS) computer code was used for calculation of doses from waterborne effluents.
Site-specific parameters used in the calculations for the Danville receiver are shown in Table 4-1. The RETDAS code was also used for calculation of doses from airborne effluents.
The calculated doses and direct radiation estimates can be used to estimate the doses to maximally exposed members of the 1-3 public. Table 4-2 summarizes maximum calculated doses to members of the public from airborne and waterborne effluents.
Table 4-3 presents calculated collective doses to members of the public within the Riverlands/Energy Information Center Complex.Table 4-4 summarizes the calculated doses for residences and other occupied areas within the site boundary and the nearest dairy. Additionally, Section 4 includes a description of the methodology used in the calculation and resultant dose impact of Carbon-14 released from the station.Section 5 of this report documents changes to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Technical Requirements Manual and the Solid Radioactive Waste Process Control Program.Section 6 presents a listing of cases (if any) in which airborne or waterborne effluent monitoring instrumentation was declared inoperable and was not restored to operability within the time period specified in Technical Requirements 3.11.1.4, 3.11.1.5 and 3.11.2.6 Action Statements.
In addition, this section presents issues (if any) with the collection of milk or fresh leafy vegetables per Technical Requirement 3.11.4.1 and changes due to the land use census per Technical Requirement 3.11.4.2.
Section 6 also includes reporting associated with the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Groundwater Protection Initiative.
Section 7 contains corrections (if any) to previous Radioactive Effluent Release Reports.Section 8 contains information on effluent and offsite dose from the systems classified as insignificant effluent pathways.1-4
SUMMARY
During 2014 there were two hundred eight (208) liquid batch releases resulting in a total release volume of approximately two million six hundred seventy thousand (2,670,000) gallons. The total number of liquid batch releases and total volume released in 2014 was lower than the corresponding values for 2013 (210 releases resulting in 3,000,000 gallons released in 2013). The predominant radionuclide released in liquid effluents during 2014 was tritium. Approximately eighty three (83) curies of tritium were released in liquid effluents in 2014, compared to eight one (81) curies released in 2013.When compared with all radionuclides released in liquid effluents in 2014, Co-60 was the main contributor to the resultant offsite dose. Consistent with previous years, the offsite dose from liquid releases in 2014 was less than one percent (1%) of the annual limits for both organ and whole body dose.In 2010, an industry initiative (supported by EPRI and NEI) was established to evaluate and report Carbon-14 (C-14) in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report. The initiative is rooted in Regulatory Guide 1.21, Revision 2, "Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactive Material in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents and Solid Waste", in that the NRC has recommended that U.S. nuclear power plants evaluate whether C-14 is a "principal radionuclide", and if so, report the amount of C-14 released.
The C-14 reported as released from the Susquehanna station in 2014 is calculated based on samples taken from each units Offgas system in October 2012, specifically the Offgas post-treatment sample stream. Approximately 42 Curies of C-14 were released in gaseous effluents in 2014. See section 4 for additional details on C-14 released in airborne effluents.
Historically, tritium has been the predominant radionuclide (both in curies and resultant offsite dose) released in gaseous effluents from the Susquehanna station.Approximately twenty six (26) curies of tritium were released in gaseous effluents in 2014 compared to one (1) curie in 2013. The resultant maximum offsite organ dose due to gaseous effluents from Unit-I for 2014 was 1.55E-1 mrem, which is 1.03% of the per unit annual limit of fifteen (15) mrem. The resultant maximum offsite organ dose due to gaseous effluents from Unit-2 for 2014 was 6.26E-2 mrem, which is 0.42 % of the per unit annual limit of fifteen (15) mrem. The maximum offsite dose from gaseous effluents in 2014 is greater than the maximum offsite dose from gaseous effluents in 2013 primarily due to the slight increase in airborne effluent tritium.1-5 FIGURE 1-1 AIRBORNE EFFLUENT RELEASE POINTS C-j UNIT I Ui REACTORRETR BUILDING ULD EXHAUSTEHAS VENT VN UNIT 2 REACTOR BUILDING EX14AUST VENT i h 1-6 FIGURE 1-2 WATERBORNE EFFLUENT PATHWAY FROM EVAPORATOR HEATING STEAM CONDENSATE RETURN TANK FROM PHASE SEPARATORS (DECANT)FROM RHR SYSTEM (SUPPRESSION POOL TRANSFERS)
-RADWASTE BUILDING DRAINS REACTOR WELL SEAL LEAK DRAIN REACTOR BUILDING DRAINS I 44 4 DRYWELL DRAINS I I LIQUID EFFLUENT RELEASE FLOWPATH I f TURBINE BUILDING DRAINS I t RADWASTE BUILDING DRAINS I (M-161, M-162, M-163 AND M-164)RECYCLE-s LIQUID RADWASTE LIQUID R'AOWASTE COLLECTION AND SURGE TANKS OT-302A THRU F OT-304A THRII DIUDLQUDLQ I WASTEMIN N RESITAS LRADWASTE SAMPLE TANKS LIQUID RADWASTE O-0A&B031OT-303A THRU F COLLECTION TANK PUMPS 0P-301A,B WASTE MIXING FUEL POOL CLEANUP SWMS SWMS)LIQUID RADWASTE~SAMPLE TANK PUMPS 0P-522A, B C CONDENSATE STORAGE TANKS OT-522A & B S RADWASTE BUILDING FUEL POOL CLEANUP SAMPLE STATION SYSTEM CHEMICAL DECOr RWCU CHEMICAL DECdN. CHEMICAL DECON LAS & DEC(AUX. BOILER BLOWDOWNS CHEMICAL DRAIN TANK[CEMICAL WASTE TANK ET-314 CHEMICAL WASTE TANK P(2) CONDENSATE DEMIN RESIN REGEN. TANKS SCHEMICAL WASTE NEUTRALIZING TANKS 1T-130A, B 2T-130A, CHEMICAL WASTE NEUTRALIZING TANK PUMPS 1P-130A, B AND 2P-130A, B.-----------
WSTE DISTILLATE
EVAPORATORS SAMPLE TANK ,B (1) OT-321 EVAPORATOR CNCENTRAT
=STORAGE TANK DSILT OT-322 SAMPLE TANK PUMPS , P-327A, B CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK DISCHARGE PUMP OP-328 PERSONNEL DECONTAMINATION (DETERGENTS)
FLOOR DECON (SOL CASK CLEANING DRAINSýREGULATED SHOP DRAINS LAUNDRY DRAINS (3) :::::::]LAUN DRY DRAIN LAUNDRY DRAIN LAUNDRY DRAIN TANKS FILTERS SAMPLE TANKS OT-31 I IA, B LAUN RY DRAIN OF-313Al-A3 OT-312 TAN PUMPS OF31381-B3 LAUNDRY DRAIN Op- 18A, B SAMPLE TANK PUMPS I 2 n z 0: 0 z 0 0 0 0 I%-(I) RADWASTE EVAPORATORS ARE NOT USED (2) COND DEMIN RESINS CURRENTLY NOT REGENERATED (3) CONTAMINATED CLOTHING CURRENTLY NOT LAUNDERED ONSITE H SUSQUEHANNA RIVER 1-7 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
- 1. Regulatory Limits Technical Requirements 3.11.1 and 3.11.2 outline requirements for release of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents, respectively.
Concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid effluents and resulting dose are limited in unrestricted areas. Dose and dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents are limited in areas at or beyond the site boundary.
Technical Requirement limits are listed inTable 1-1.2. Maximum Permissible Concentrations in Waterborne Effluents The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to unrestricted areas is limited to 10 times the concentrations specified in 10 CFR Part 20 Appendix B Table 2, Column 2, for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases.For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration is limited to 2.OE-04 pCi/ml total activity (TRO 3.11.1.1).
- 3. Average Energy of Fission and Activation Gas The Calculation of Noble Gas Effluent Average Energies E-Bar Beta and Gamma for 2014 resulted in an Annual E-Bar Beta value of 4.41 E-1 MeV and E-Bar Gamma value of 1.20E+0 MeV.4. Measurements and Approximations of Total Radioactivity Analyses of specific radionuclides in effluent samples are used to evaluate the radioactive composition and concentration of effluents.
- 5. Methods of Quantifying Effluents a. Fission and Activation Gases: Gas samples are routinely collected monthly and analyzed with a high resolution (HPGE) detector system which incorporates a data reduction program to determine radionuclide composition in terms of specific activity.
Data from the continuous vent monitors are used to determine the average concentration of noble gases. The high resolution (HPGE) isotopic scan is used to convert the continuous vent monitor activity to actual activity based on the determined nuclide mixture. The vent and sample flow rates are continuously monitored and the average flow rates for each vent are used to calculate the total activity released in a given time period. When the continuous monitors are out of service, manual grab samples are taken from each vent once every eight hours (once every four 1-8 hours for the standby gas treatment vent when standby gas treatment system is in service).b. lodines: Iodine is continuously collected on charcoal or silver zeolite cartridges via an isokinetic sampling assembly in each vent. Filters are normally exchanged once per week and analyzed on a high resolution (HPGE) system. The daily average flow rates for the vents and sample pumps are averaged for the duration of the sampling period and a ratio of vent flow rate to sample flow rate is determined.
The ratio is used to determine the total activity of each isotope released during the time period in question.
When the continuous samplers are out of service, iodine is continuously collected from alternate sampling ports available on the sample lines or directly from the affected rooftop vent(s).c. Particulates:
Particulates are continuously collected via an isokinetic sampling assembly in each vent. Filters are normally exchanged once per week and analyzed on a high resolution (HPGE) system. Flow rate corrections are performed as for iodines. When the continuous samplers are out of service, particulates are continuously collected from alternate sampling ports available on the sample lines or directly from the affected rooftop vent(s).d. Tritium: Airborne tritium is collected monthly via bubbler sampler. The sample is collected for one hour at a flow rate of approximately 1000 cc/min.Tritium activity in the bubbler sample is determined by liquid scintillation counting.
The liquid sample tritium' concentration is then converted to air concentration by volume proportion.
- e. Waterborne Effluents:
Each tank of liquid radwaste is sampled and analyzed for principal gamma emitters prior to release. Each sample tank is recirculated for a sufficient amount of time prior to sampling to ensure that a representative sample is obtained.
Samples are analyzed on a high resolution (HPGE) system and release permits are generated based on the values obtained from the isotopic analysis and the most recent values for tritium, gross alpha, iron-55, and strontium-89 and -90. An aliquot based on release volume is saved and added to monthly and quarterly composite containers.
The monthly tritium analysis is done in-house.
A monthly composite is sent to a vendor laboratory for gross alpha analysis.
A quarterly composite is sent to a vendor laboratory for iron-55, strontium-89 and-90 analyses.The concentration of each radionuclide in each batch is multiplied by the volume of the batch to determine the total quantity of each nuclide released in each batch. The isotopic totals for each batch are summed to determine the total source term for the report period.1-9 TABLE 1-1 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT LIMITS A. NOBLE GASES: 1. 500 mrem/year
-TOTAL BODY3000 mrem/year
-SKIN instantaneous dose rate limit at and beyond the site boundary (TRO 3.11.2.1.1)
- 2. 5 mrad -AIR GAMMA10 mrad -AIR BETA-quarterly air dose limits per reactor unit at and beyond the site boundary (TRO 3.11.2.2a)
- 3. 10 mrad- AIR GAMMA20 mrad -AIR BETA annual air dose limits per reactor unit at and beyond the site boundary (TRO 3.11.2.2.b)
B. AIRBORNE 1-131, 1-133, TRITIUM, PARTICULATES WITH HALF-LIVES
> 8 DAYS: 1. <1500 mrem/year
-ORGAN (inhalation pathways only)instantaneous dose rate limit at and beyond the site boundary (TRO 3.11.2.1.II.A)
- 2. <7.5 mrem- ORGAN-quarterly dose limit per reactor unit at and beyond the site boundary (TRO 3.11.2.3.a)
- 3. 1l5 mrem -ORGAN-annual dose limit per reactor unit at and beyond the site boundary (TRO 3.11.2.3.b) 1-10 C. LIQUID EFFLUENTS:
- 1. <1.5 mrem -TOTAL BODY<5.0 mrem -ORGAN-quarterly dose limits per unit (TRO 3.11.1.2.a)
- 2. <3.0 mrem -TOTAL BODY<10.0 mrem -ORGAN-annual dose limits per unit (TRO 3.11.1.2.b)
D. AIRBORNE EFFLUENT:
BASES FOR PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT VALUES IN TABLE 2-1 Fission and Activation Gases Derived release rate limits based on the Technical Requirement (TRO 3.11.2.1.1.A and B) limits of 500 mrem/yr to the total body and 3000 mrem/yr to the skin were calculated (PPL calculation EC-ENVR-1041 Rev. 7)from the expected mix of noble gas radionuclides presented in Attachment A of ODCM-QA-003, Effluent Monitor Setpoints.
The lower limit of 2.OOE+06 pCi/min (3.33E+04 pCi/sec) based on total body dose rate is used.Iodine-131 A derived release rate limit for 1-131 based on the Technical Requirement (TRO 3.11.2.1.Il.A) limit of 1500 mrem/yr from 1-131, 1-133, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days was calculated (PPL calculation EC-ENVR-1041 Rev. 7) based on the ratio of the expected annual release quantities of 1-131 and 1-133 provided in Attachment E of ODCM-QA-004, Airborne Effluent Dose Calculations.
The limit is 1.36E+02 pCi/min I-131 (2.27E+00 pCi/sec).Particulates A derived release rate limit for particulate activity other than iodines based on the Technical Requirement (TRO 3.11.2.1 .Il.A) limit of 1500 mrem/yr from I-131, 1-133, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days was calculated (PPL calculation EC-ENVR-1041 Rev. 7) based on the expected annual release quanities of particulate radionuclides provided in Attachment E of ODCM-QA-004, Airborne Effluent Dose Calculations.
The limit is 3.83E+03 pCi/min (6.38E+01 pCi/sec).1-11 Tritium A derived release rate was calculated based on the 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 1, Effluent Concentration Limit for tritium (1.OE-07 pCi/cc) to unrestricted areas. A relative concentration of 4.1 E-05 sec/m 3 was assumed (PPL calculation EC-ENVR-1040).
The limit is 1.46E+05 pCi/min (2.44E+03 pCi/sec).Radionuclide Fractional Summation The sum of the percentages of applicable limits for particulates, iodine and tritium must be less than 100%.E. WATERBORNE EFFLUENT:
BASES FOR PERCENT OF APPLICABLE LIMIT VALUES IN TABLE 2-3 Fission and Activation Products Concentrations of fission and activation products in liquid effluent from radwaste effluent are determined for each batch prior to release. Each isotope concentration is compared to ten times the 1 0CFR20 Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 Effluent Concentration Values (TRO 3.11.1.1).
Tritium Liquid effluent quarterly tritium concentrations are compared to ten times the 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2, Effluent Concentration value of 1.0E-03 pCi/ml to unrestricted areas.Dissolved and Entrained Gases Liquid effluent concentrations for dissolved and entrained gases are compared to the limiting value for total noble gas activity of 2.OE-04 pCi/ml (TRO 3.11.1.1).
Radionuclide Fractional Summation The sum of the percentages of applicable limits for fission and activation products, tritium and dissolved and entrained gases must be less than 100%.1-12 SECTION 2 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL DATA 2-1 Airborne Effluents Summaries of the radionuclide total curie activities and average release rates are included in Tables 2-1 and 2-2. Total for Period values in Table 2-2 may not equal the sum of the Curies listed for each radionuclide due to unit rounding of the individual isotopes.
Carbon-14 (C-14) activity released is not included in Tables 2-1 or 2-2. See Section 4 for additional details on the calculation of C-14 released in 2014 from the Susquehanna station. If a radionuclide was not detected, zero activity was used for that isotope in dose calculations and the activity is listed as "<MDC" (less than the minimum detectable concentration) in Tables 2-1 and 2-2. <MDC indicates that no activity was positively detected in any sample when samples were analyzed with techniques which achieved the required Lower Limits of Detection (LLD) as specified in the Technical Requirement (TRO) Table 3.11.2.1-1, Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Sampling and Analysis Program. In all cases, the measurement laboratory MDCs were at or below the LLD levels required by Technical Requirements.
The following are typical measurement laboratory MDCs.Typical MDCs Radionuclide MDC (yCi/cc)Kr-87 4.3 E-08 Kr-88 4.6 E-08 Xe-1 33 3.0 E-08 Xe-133m 1.1 E-07 Xe-135 1.5 E-08 Xe-135rn 8.0 E-08 Xe-138 1.5 E-07 Mn-54 2.9 E-13 Fe-59 2.8 E-13 Co-58 1.8 E-13 Co-60 3.8 E-13 Zn-65 1.0 E-13 Mo-99 1.0 E-12 Cs-134 2.4 E-13 Cs-1 37 1.1 E-13 Ce-141 1.0 E-13 Ce-144 5.0 E-13 1-131 4.4 E-14 Sr-89 1.1 E-13 Sr-90 1.3 E-14 H-3 1.5 E-08 Gross Alpha 2.3 E-14 2-2 Batch Releases 1. Number of Batch Releases:
0 2. Total Time Period for Batch Release: NA 3. Maximum Time Period for a Batch Release: NA 4. Average Time Period for a Batch Release: NA 5. Minimum Time Period for a Batch Release: NA Abnormal Releases 1. Number of Releases 0 2. Total Activity Released NA 2-3 TABLE 2-1 AIRBORNE EFFLUENT -SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES First Second Third Fourth Unit I Quarter I Quarter Quarter Quarter A. Fission and Activation Gas Total Release Ci <MDC <MDC 2.44E+00 5.66E+00 Average Release Rate for Period pCi/sec 0 0 3.07E-01 7.12E-01 Percent of Applicable Limit (3.33E+04
% 0 0 9.21 E-04 2.14E-03 pCi/sec)B. lodines Total 1-131 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Average Release Rate for Period pCi/sec 0 0 0 0 Percent of Applicable Limit (2.27E+00
% 0 0 0 0 pCi/sec)C. Particulate Particulate with Half-Life
>8 Days Ci <MDC 1.13E-04 <MDC 7.99E-06 Average Release Rate for Period pCi/sec 0 1.43E-05 0 1.01 E-06 Percent of Applicable Limit (6.38E+01
% 0 2.25E-05 0 1.58E-06 pCi/sec)Gross Alpha Radioactivity Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC" <MDC D. Tritium Total Release Ci 5.77E+00 4.36E+00 9.01E+00 6.65E+00 Average Release Rate for Period pCi/sec 7.42E-01 5.54E-01 1.13E+00 8.36E-01 Percent of Applicable Limit (2.44E+03
% 3.04E-02 *2.27E-02 4.65E-02 3.43E-02 pCi/sec)E. Radionuclide Fractional Summation Sum of Percent of Applicable Limit [ 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.03 During Period for B, C and D (Limit =100%)2-4 TABLE 2-2 AIRBORNE EFFLUENT -RADIONUCLIDES RELEASED Releases in Continuous Mode First Second Third Fourth Nuclides Released Unit Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter A. Fission and Activation Gases N-13 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Ar-41 Ci <MDC <MDC 2.19E+00 5.06E+00 Kr-85 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Kr-85m Ci <MDC <MDC 1.01E-01 2.36E-01 Kr-87 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Kr-88 Ci <MDC <MDC 5.80E-02 1.18E-01 Kr-89 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Xe-i 33 Ci <MDC <MDC 8.37E-02 2.37E-01 Xe-I 35 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Xe-135m Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Xe-i 37 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Xe-1 38 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Total for Period Ci 0 0 2.44E+00 5.66E+00 B. lodines 1-131 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC 1-133 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC 1-135 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Total for Period Ci 0 0 0 0 C. Particulate Cr-51 Ci <MDC 3.79E-05 <MDC <MDC Mn-54 Ci <MDC 5.78E-06 <MDC 7.99E-06 Fe-59 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Co-57 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Co-58 Ci <MDC 3.64E-06 <MDC <MDC Co-60 Ci <MDC 6.55E-05 <MDC <MDC Zn-65 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Sr-89 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Sr-90 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Cs-1 34 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Cs-1 37 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Ce-141 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Ce-144 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Nb-95 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Ba-La-140 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Total for Period Ci 0 1.13E-04 0 7.99E-06 2-5 Waterborne Effluents Summaries of the radionuclide total curie activities, average diluted concentrations, and percent of applicable Technical Requirement limits are included in Tables 2-3 and 2-4.Total for Period values in Table 2-4 may not equal the sum of the Curies listed for each radionuclide due to unit rounding of the individual isotopes.Batch Releases*Qtr. I Qtr. 2 Qtr. 3 Qtr. 4 1. Number of Batch Releases 2. Total Time Period for Batch Releases 3. Maximum Time Period for a Batch Release 4. Average Time Period for a Batch Release 5. Minimum Time Period for a Batch Release 6. Average Cooling Tower Blowdown Flow Rate During Periods of Release 7. Susquehanna River Flow Rate 46 *9.02E+03 3.04E+02 59 9.18E+03 2.95E+02 43 6.58E+03 2.81 E+02 60 8.83E+03 2.96E+02 Annual 208 3.36E+04 3.04E+02 1.62E+02 2.00E+01 1.96E+02 1.56E+02 1.53E+02 1.47E+02 2.00E+01 3.60E+01 3.50E+01 3.50E+01 1.12E+04 1.17E+04 1.31E+04 1.15E+04 1.18E+04 7.02E+06 1.21E+07 2.61E+06 4.52E+06 6.53E+06*Units of time and flow are expressed in minutes and gallons respectively.
per minute (gpm), If a radionuclide was not detected, zero activity was used for that isotope in dose calculations and the activity is listed as "<MDC" (less than the miniumum detectable concentration) in Tables 2-3 and 2-4. <MDC indicates that no activity was positively detected in any sample when samples were analyzed with techniques which achieved the required Lower Limits of Detection (LLD) as specified in the Technical Requirement 3.11.1.1-1, Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program. In all cases, the measurement laboratory MDCs were at or below the LLD levels required by Technical Requirements.
The following are typical measurement laboratory MDCs.Radionuclide Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Mo-99 1-131 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ce-141 Ce-1 44 Sr-89 Sr-90 Fe-55 H-3 Gross Alpha MDC (pCi/mI)4.5 E-08 5.0 E-08 4.0 E-08 5.4 E-08 4.9 E-08 1.7 E-07 2.0 E-08 2.2 E-08 2.6 E-08 3.2 E-08 1.3 E-07 4.4 E-08 1.6 E-08 8.2 E-07 3.6 E-06 3.7 E-09 2-6 Abnormal Releases 1. Number of releases 0 0 0 0 2. Volume Released (Gallons)
N/A N/A N/A N/A 3. Total Activity Released (Ci) N/A N/A N/A N/A 2-7 TABLE 2-3 WATERBORNE EFFLUENT -SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Third Fourth First tm Second Third rlm Irfiar Fourth r'%"orfnr A M-I A A-f-+;- D A +Ilni+w. Ii *l 01lm /'- II. l I I MI UIIItLO I , %.LOI t I .LL.I(; I wLI.I Lfl SLL, L l 1. Total Release (excluding:
Tritium, Ent.Gases, Alpha) Ci 2.33E-03 6.40E-03 4.74E-03 7.13E-03 2. Average Diluted Concentration During Period Ci/ml 6.10E-09 1.57E-08 1.46E-08 1.85E-08 3. Sum of Average Diluted Cn/Ln Ratio During Period Unitless 1.08E-04 4.18E-04 4.07E-04 2.75E-04 4. Percent of Applicable Limit (Ratio < 1.0) 1 % 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.03 B. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 2.79E+01 1.95E+01 1.38E+01 2.15E+01 2. Average Diluted Concentration During Period pCi/ml 7.29E-05 4.79E-05 4.24E-05 5.56E-05 3. Percent of Applicable Limit (1.OE-2 pCi/ml) % 0.73 0.48 0.42 0.56 C. Dissolved and Entrained Gases 1. Total Release Ci 1.07E-06 1.51 E-05 4.24E-06 3.67E-06j 2. Average Diluted Concentration pCi/mI 2.80E-12 .3.71E-11 1.30E-11 9.52E-12 During Period 3. Percent of Applicable Limit (2.OE-4 pCi/ml) % 1.40E-06 1.85E-05 6.50E-06 4.76E-06 D. Radionuclide Fractional Summation 1. Sum of Percent of Applicable Limit During I (Period for A, B and C (Limit = 100%) % 0.74 0.52 0.46 0.59 E. Gross Alpha Radioactivity I1. Total Release Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC F. Volume of Water Released (Prior to Dilution)G. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Period of Release H. Volume of Dilution Water Used Over Entire Period[ Gallons 7.33E+05 7.26E+05 5.18E+05 6.98E+05 Liters 2.77E+06 2.75E+06 I 1.96E+06 2.64E+06 Gallons 1.00E+08 1.07E+08 8.55E+07 1.01E+08 Liters 3.80E+08 4.05E+08 3.24E+08 3.83E+08 Gallons j 1.29E+09 1.59E+09 1.54E+09 1.72E+09 Liters 4.88E+09 6.03E+09 5.85E+09 6.50E+09 2-8 TABLE 2-4 WATERBORNE EFFLUENT -RADIONUCLIDES RELEASED Releases in Batch Mode Nuclides Unit First Second Third Fourth Released Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter A. Fission and Activation Products Ba-142 Ci <MDC 5.98E-05 <MDC <MDC Cr-51 Ci 7.70E-04 2.50E-04 1.37E-04 2.91 E-03 Mn-54 Ci 2.48E-04 9.58E-04 6.91 E-04 3.92E-04 Fe-55 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Co-58 Ci .1.26E-04 1.16E-04 4.75E-06 6.41E-04 Fe-59 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC 3.74E-06 Co-60 Ci 1.19E-03 4.96E-03 3.90E-03 2.88E-03 Zn-65 Ci <MDC 4.08E-05 <MDC 2.59E-04 Sr-89 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Sr-90 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Nb-95 Ci <MDC 3.34E-07 <MDC <MDC Mo-99 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC 1.04E-05 Nb-97 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Tc-99m Ci <MDC 5.08E-07 1.06E-05 4.30E-05 Te-134 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Cs-i 37 Ci <MDC 5.23E-06 <MDC <MDC Sb-124 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC 8.13E-07 Ta-182 Ci <MDC 1.07E-05 <MDC <MDC U-235 Ci <MDC <MDC 9.58E-08 <MDC Total for Period Ci 2.33E-03 6.40E-03 4.74E-03 7.13E-03 B. Tritium Total for Period Ci [ 2.79E+01 1.95E+O1 1.38E+01 2.15E+01 C. Dissolved and Entrained Gases Ar-41 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Kr-85 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Kr-85m Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Kr-87 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Kr-88 Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Xe-131m Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Xe-I 33m Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Xe-133 Ci <MDC 1.51E-05 <MDC <MDC Xe-1 35m Ci <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC Xe-135 Ci 1.07E-06 <MDC 4.24E-06 3.67E-06 Total for Period Ci 1.07E-06 1.51 E-05 4.24E-06 3.67E-06 2-9 Figure 2-1 Susquehanna River Monthly Average Flow Rates Data Period: 2014 0 0 EL 0)I 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0.5 I I I I I 0 0 2.0 0.0 2-10 S Figure 2-2 Monthly Liquid Radwaste Discharge Totals 600 500 400 E 0 0)200 100 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec-.--2014 2-11 0 TABLE 2-5 ESTIMATED TOTAL ERRORS ASSOCIATED WITH EFFLUENTS MEASUREMENTS ESTIMATED MEASUREMENT TOTAL ERROR 1. Airborne Effluents a. Fission and Activation Gases 15.9%b. 1-131 13.3%c. Particulates (incl. Gross Alpha) 15.8%d. Tritium 13.6%2. Waterborne Effluents a. Fission and Activation Products 5.0%b. Tritium 3.3%c. Dissolved and Entrained Gases 8.4%d. Gross Alpha Activity 6.0%e. Volume of Waste Released 5.0%(Prior to Dilution)f. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Period 15.0%ESTIMATED MAXIMUM MEASUREMENT ERROR 3. Solid Wastes a. Contaminated Waste Oil -Class A Fuel Blending +/-25%for Co-Generation
- b. Condensate Demineralizer
/ Radwaste Demineralizer
+/-25%Class A HIC (Pyrolysis)
+/-25%d. Processed DAW -Class A HIC (Non-Processed)
+/-25%e. Liquid Radwaste Filter Media -Class A HIC (Pyrolysis)
+/-25%f. Processed DAW -Class A Strong Tight Container
+25%(Compacted)
- g. Processed DAW -Class A Strong Tight Container
+/-25%(Compacted) 2-12 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION RADIOACTIVE WASTE REPORT RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE DATA PERIOD: PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: JANUARY 1, 2014- DECEMBER 31,2014 K ImBoEýy [ URCHISON HE-ALT. PHYSICIST F' J FF GRISWOLD RADIOLOGICAL OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR 2-13 REPORT NOTES 0 1. All activities reported in Milli-Curies (mCi) unless otherwise noted.2. Reported activities, as indicated with the (<) sign, are comprised in whole or part of MDL values.3. Estimated maximum measurement error is +/-25%.2-14 TABLE 2-6 WASTE DISPOSITION Data Period: January 1, 2014 -December 31, 2014 A. SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFF-SITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation Destination NONE B. IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation NONE Destination 2-15 Table 2-7 Waste Release Detail Report Year: 2014
Reference:
14-021 Class: A Volume Reduction Vendor: Yes Source: Contaminated Waste Oil Container:
None Process: Fuel Blending for Co-Generation QA Done: Yes By: effluents 0 Nuclides Activity (mCi)C-14 < 6.930E-04 CO-60 2.030E+00 CS-137 1.310E-03 FE-55 2.950E+00 H-3 7.040E+00 1-129 < 4.070E-03 MN-54 1.300E-02 NI-63 1.530E-01 TC-99 < 3.490E-03 Total Activity (Ci) 0.012 Container Volume 650.000 ft 3% of Total 0.01%16.64 %0.01%24.19 %57.72 %0.03%0.11%1.25 %0.03 %100.00 %18.406 m 3 S 2-16 S Table 2-8 Annual Waste Release Summary Report Year:
Reference:
Class: Source: Container:
Process: QA Done: 2014 BEAD RESIN A Volume Reduction Vendor: Yes Condensate Demineralizer
/ Radwaste Demineralizer HIC (High Integrity Container)
Pyrolysis Yes By: effluents Nuclides AG-!IOM AM-241 C-14 CE-144 CM-242 CO-57 CO-58 CO-60 CR-51 CS-137 FE-55 FE-59 H-3 1-129 1-131 LA-140 MN- 54 NB-95 NI-59 NI-63 PU-241 SB-124 SB-125 SR-89 SR-90 TA-182 TC-99 ZN- 65 ZR-95 Total Activity (Ci)Container Volume Activity (mCi)1.580E+00 0.OOOE+00 3.640E+02 1.430E-03 0.OOOE+00 2. 980E-01 1. 360E+02 4. 080E+03 2 .260E+01 9 .070E+00 1 .480E+03 4. 500E+00 3. 150E+02 5 .390E-01 1.060E+00 3 .510E-04 6.320E+02 6.440E+00 3.000E-01 1.900E+02 0.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+00 1.970E+00 8.010E-03 4.050E-01 8.810E+00 3.700E+00 1.610E+02 7.860E+00 7.427 716.700 ft 3% of Total 0.02 %0.00 %4.90 %0.00 %0.00 %0.00 %1.83 %54.93 %0.30 %0.12 %19.93 %0.06 %4.24 -0.01%0.01%0.00 %8.51%0.09 %0.00 %2.56 %0.00 %0.00 %0.03 %0.00 %0.01%0.12 %0.05 %2.17 %0.11 %100.00 %20.295 m 3 2-17 Table 2-9 Annual Waste Release Summary Report 2014 DAW CFS FILTERS A Volume Reduction Vendor: Yes Processed DAW HIC (High Integrity Container)
Compacted Yes By: effluents Year:
Reference:
Class: Source: Container:
Process: QA Done: Nuclides C-14 CO-58 CO-60 CS-137 FE-55 H-3 1-129 MN-54 NI-63 TC-99 ZN-65 Total Activity (Ci)Container Volume Activity (mCi)3.630E-02 2.330E+00 6.710E+02 1.460E-01 1.930E+03 2.180E+00 2.370E-02 6.480E+01 2.890E+01 1.230E-01 1.950E+01 2.719 17.300 ft 3% of Total 0.00%0.09 24.68 %0.01%70.98 %0.08%0.00%2.38%1.06%0.00%0.72%100.00 %*0.490 m 3 2-18 Table 2-10 Annual Waste Release Summary Report Year: 2014
Reference:
Class: Source: Container:
Process: QA Done: DAW-MEMPHIS-ASBESTOS A Volume Reduction Vendor: Yes Processed DAW HIC (High Integrity Container)
Non-Processed Yes By: effluents Nuclides CO-58 CO-60 CS-137 FE-55 MN-54 NB-95 NI-63 ZN-65 Total Activity (Ci)Container Volume Activity (mCi)1.460E+00 1.990E+01 9.050E-02 1.520E+01 1.420E+00 1.450E+00 5.190E-01 7.600E-01 0.041 35.930 ft 3% of Total 3.58 %48.77 %0.22 %37.25 %3.48 %3.55 %1.27 %1.86 %100.00 %1.017 m 3 2-19 Table 2-11 Annual Waste Release Summary Report 2014 ERWIN -LRW FM A Volume Reduction Vendor: Yes Liquid Radwaste Filter Media HIC (High Integrity Container)
Pyrolysis Yes By: effluents 0 Year:
Reference:
Class: Source: Container:
Process: QA Done: Nuclides C-14 CO-58 CO-60 CR-51 CS-137 FE-55 FE-59 H-3 1-129 MN-54 NB-95 NI-63 SB-124 SR-90 TA-182 TC-99 ZN-65 ZR-95 Total Activity (Ci)Container Volume Activity (mCi)4.420E-02 3.050E+00 1.690E+03 4.950E-03 5.590E-01 1.050E+03 1.880E-02 1.490E+01 1.750E-02 1.550E+02 5.120E-03 3.640E+01 2.430E-02 3.890E-02 1.500E+00 9.200E-02 4.300E+01 8.430E-02 2.995 17.300 ft 3% of Total 0.00%0.10%56.43 %0.00%0.02%35.06 %0.00 %0.50 %0.00 %5.18 %0.00 %1.22 %0.00 %0.00 %0.05 %0.00 %1.44 %0.00 %100.00 %0.490 m 3 2-20 Table 2-12 Annual Waste Release Summary Report Year:
Reference:
Class: Source: Container:
Process: QA Done: Nuclides 2014 MEMPHIS/ERWIN DAW A Volume Reduction Vendor: Yes Processed DAW Strong Tight Container Compacted Yes By: effluents AG-IIOM AM-241 C-14 CE-144 CM-242 CO-57 CO-58 CO-60 CR-5l CS-137 FE-55 FE-59 H-3 1-129 1-131 LA- 140 MN-54 NB-95 NI-59 NI-63 PU-241 SB-124 SB-125 SR-89 SR-90 TA-182 TC-99 ZN-65 ZR-95 Total Activity (Ci)Container Volume Activity (mCi)6.440E-06 4.020E-06 4.300E-02 1.840E-05 3.050E-06 3.840E-03 2. 040E+02 2. 860E+03 1. 770E-03 1 .290E+01 2 .180E+03 1. 930E-04 1. 150E+01 1. 080E-02 1. 930E-05 0 OOOE+00 2. 030E+02 2. 010E+02 3. 640E-03 7 .470E+01 5. 040E-04 3 .450E-06 2 .430E-02 1. 350E-04 9. 690E-04 2. 020E-04 6. 810E-02 1. 080E+02 5. 610E-04 5.855 5456.000 ft 3% of Total 0.00 %0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.48 %48.84 %0.00 %0.22 %37.23 %0.00 %0.20 %0.00 %0.00 %0.00 %3.47 %3.43 %0.00 %1.28 %0.00 %0.00 %0.00 %0.00 %0.00 %0.00 %0.00 %1.84 %0.00 %100.00 %-154.500 m 3 2-21 Table 2-13 Annual Waste Release Summary Report Year: 2014
Reference:
SPMF 2014 Class: A Volume Reduction Vendor: Yes Source: Processed DAW Container:
Strong Tight Container Process: Compacted QA Done: Yes By: effluents Nuclides CO-58 CO-60 CS-137 FE-55 H-3 MN-54 NB-95 NI-63 ZN-65 Total Activity (Ci)Container Volume Activity (mCi)1. 460E+02 2. 040E+03 9. 280E+00 1. 560E+03 7 .450E+00 1. 450E+02 1. 440E+02 5. 330E+01 7. 730E+01 4.182 2268.000 ft 3% of Total 3.49 %48.78 %0.22%37.30 %0.18%3.47%3.44%1.27%1.85%100.00 %64.224 m 3 2-22 SECTION 3 METEOROLOGICAL DATA AND DISPERSION ESTIMATES 3-1 METEOROLOGY AND DISPERSION DATA Meteorological data have been collected at the PPL Susquehanna, LLC site since the early 1970s. At the present time, the meteorological system is based on a 300-foot high tower located approximately 1,000 feet to the southeast of the plant. Wind sensors are mounted at the 10m and 60m elevations on this tower. Vertical temperature differential is measured with redundant sensor pairs between the 10m and 60m levels. Sigma theta (the standard deviation of horizontal wind direction) is calculated from wind direction at both levels. Dew point and ambient temperature sensors are present at the 10m level. Precipitation is measured at ground level.A back-up meteorological tower was erected in 1982. It is a 10m tower providing alternate measurements of wind speed, wind direction, and sigma theta. A 10m downriver meteorological tower is also available.
This tower measures wind speed, wind direction, sigma theta, temperature and dew point.Meteorological data are transmitted to the plant Control Room, Technical Support Center, Emergency Operations Facility for emergency response availability, and ABSG Consulting, Inc. ABSG Consulting, Inc., located in Rockville, Maryland, provides meteorological consulting services to PPL Susquehanna, LLC.Regulatory Guide 1.23 (Safety Guide 23) requires at least 90% data recovery for meteorological instrumentation.
During 2014, all meteorological instrumentation met the 90% data recovery requirement.
Table 3-1 lists the percent valid data recovery values for the parameters monitored as part of the PPL Susquehanna Meteorological Monitoring Program.Dispersion modeling for effluents from normal operation is done using the MIDAS system XDCALC program, a straight-line Gaussian plume model designed to estimate average relative concentration.
The model was developed in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.111. For periods when the wind speed is calm, the actual wind direction that last occurred is used.XDCALC and the XQINTR program that interpolates X/Q values to exact locations both use terrain correction factors to account for the temporal and spatial variations in the airflow in the region. A straight-line trajectory model assumes that a constant mean wind transports and diffuses effluents in the direction of airflow at the release point within the entire region of interest.
The terrain correction factors were taken from FSAR Table 2.3-128.Tables 3-2 and 3-3 provide the joint frequency distribution of wind speed and direction (as a function of delta temperature) at the 10 and 60 meter elevations of the primary meteorological tower. Table 3-4 lists no decay, undepleted X/Q values at various distances from the site. Table 3-5 lists 2.26 day decay, undepleted X/Q values at various distances from the site. Table 3-6 lists 8-day decay, depleted X/Q values at various distances from the site and Table 3-7 is a listing of D/Q (relative deposition) values at various distances from the site.3-2 TABLE 3-1 METEOROLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY FOR 2014 Parameter Percent Valid Data Recovery Wind Speed 1Oim -Primary (1) 99.8 Wind Speed 60m -Primary 99.8 Wind Speed I0m -Backup (2) 99.9 Wind Speed 10m -Downriver (3) 99.9 Wind Direction 1Cm -Primary 99.8 Wind Direction 60m -Primary 99.8 Wind Direction 10m -Backup 100.0 Wind Direction 10m -Downriver 100.0 Temperature 10m -Primary 99.6 Dew Point 10m -Primary 100.0 Delta Temperature 60m -Primary 99.4 Sigma Theta 1Cm -Primary 99.8 Sigma Theta 60m -Primary 99.8 Sigma Theta 10m -Backup 100.0 Sigma Theta 10m -Downriver 100.0 Precipitation
-Primary 99.6 COMPOSITE PARAMETERS Wind Speed and Direction 1Cm, Delta 99.4 Temperature 60-1 Cm Wind Speed and Direction 60m, Delta 99.4 Temperature 60-1 Cm (1) SSES "Primary" meteorological tower (2) SSES "Backup" meteorological tower (3) SSES "Downriver" meteorological tower 3-3 TABLE 3-2 SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 10m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 Joint Frequency Distribution Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: 10_SPD Stability Class A Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
10_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Extremely Unstable Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25> 25 Total 0 0 6 9 5 6 5 2 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 7 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7 10 5 6 7 4 8 15 20 5 0 0 0 0 0 Total 39 16 28 6 0 0 89 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 6 0 54 89 8760 3-4 TABLE 3-2 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 10m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: Stability Class B Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
10_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Moderately Unstable 10_SPD Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Total 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25 > 25 Total 0 2 4 3 1 4 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 5 0 0 0 7 4 6 9 31 7 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 14 4 2 7 13 6 14 17 48 10 5 0 0 5 20 42 87 8 0 0 157 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 6 0 54 157 8760 3-5 TABLE 3-2 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 10m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: Stability Class C Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
10_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Slightly Unstable 10_SPD Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25 > 25 Total 0 0 6 7 5 4 3 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 23 4 4 7 8 9 16 30 50 11 2 3 2 3 17 6 2 0 0 0 6 5 13 5 63 33 5 2 3 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 9 13 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 28 31 11 9 11 17 14 36 37 123 58 7 5 6 23 Total 30 198 172 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period 38 1 0 439 Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 6 0 54 439 8760 3-6 TABLE 3-2 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 10m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: 10_SPD Stability Class D Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
10_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Neutral Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25> 25 Total 26 65 122 125 126 99 89 77 93 71 48 23 11 5 9 10 181 187 161 63 51 56 101 92 172 214 285 118 71 64 90 132 168 67 25 4 3 18 18 33 59 47 178 122 78 68 137 177 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 26 73 31 4 26 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 382 319 308 192 180 173 208 203 325 333 538 342 192 141 262 345 Total 999 2038 1202 196 8 0 4443 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 6 0 54 4443 8760 3-7 TABLE 3-2 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 10m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: Stability Class E Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
10_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Slightly Stable 10_SPD Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25 > 25 Total 21 68 175 299 219 141 101 119 127 57 24 17 7 4 5 5 41 74 51 15 3 11 11 37 102 169 104 19 11 8 17 21 1 3 1 0 0 0 5 15 20 18 22 10 3 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 145 227 314 222 152 118 171 250 246 150 48 21 14 25 28 Total 1389 694 105 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period 6 0 0 2194 Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 6 0 54 2194 8760 3-8 TABLE 3-2 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 10m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31,2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: Stability Class F Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
10_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Moderately Stable 10 SPD Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 6 24 143 392 141 56 33 34 30 7 2 1 0 0 1 3 873 4 8 6 12 1 2 1 2 1 9 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0> 25 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 32 150 404 142 58 34 36 31 16 5 4 0 0 2 3 Total 52 2 0 0 0 927 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 6 0 54 927 8760 3-9 TABLE 3-2 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 10m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: 10_SPD Stability Class G Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
10_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Extremely Stable Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Total 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25 > 25 Total 0 12 76 252 63 15 8 8 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 440 1 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 78 257 63 15 8 8 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 451 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 6 0 54 451 8760 0 3-10 TABLE 3-2 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 10m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Summary of All Stability Classes Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
10_WD Lapse: DT60-10A 10 SPD Delta Temperature Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25> 25 Total 56 171 532 1087 560 325 239 242 259 142 78 42 18 9 15 18 233 292 249 101 60 79 127 141 300 437 454 153 84 75 110 156 189 82 34 4 3 18 38 58 101 86 309 173 91 72 143 195 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 3 42 92 31 4 27 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 483 546 815 1192 623 422 405 442 669 668 884 467 225 160 295 404 Total 3790 3051 1596 254 9 0 8700 Calm Hours not Included above for Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 6 0 54 8700 8760 3-11 TABLE 3-3 SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 60m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: 60_SPD Stability Class A Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
60_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Extremely Unstable Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25 > 25 Total N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Total 1 4 10 5 2 0 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 4 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 12 5 2 0 5 3 6 17 24 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 21 9 25 4 0 89 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 5 0 56 89 8760 3-12 TABLE 3-3 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 60m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: Stability Class B Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
60_WD Lapse: DT60-1 0A Delta Temperature Moderately Unstable 60_SPD Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Total 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25 >25 Total 0 0 5 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 6 1 0 1 3 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 4 7 0 3 7 22 4 2 0 0 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 3 2 5 5 20 5 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 9 14 3 1 6 13 2 12 19 51 11 4 0 2 3 14 23 59 53 7 1 157 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 5 0 56 157 8760 3-13 TABLE 3-3 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 60m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: Stability Class C Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
60_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Slightly Unstable 60_SPD Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25 > 25 Total 0 2 8 3 2 0 1 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 16 12 3 4 5 1 3 3 11 17 1 0 1 1 1 16 21 2 0 1 4 8 8 10 19 82 19 8 3 1 8 4 4 0 0 0 0 2 1 8 3 29 28 1 0 8 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 2 14 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 44 22 6 7 9 12 13 32 35 130 63 9 4 12 16 Total 23 84 210 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period 95 25 2 439 Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 5 0 56 439 8760 3-14 TABLE 3-3 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 60m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: 60_SPD Stability Class D Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
60_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Neutral Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25 > 25 Total 19 57 69 53 39 35 43 53 38 46 32 15 3 4 4 6 89 135 98 63 54 45 63 58 49 147 205 76 53 22 40 47 178 141 42 21 30 38 80 26 98 81 235 163 107 90 179 192 51 53 4 4 9 9 23 20 50 61 99 155 84 38 84 80 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 0 8 7 21 79 10 3 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 337 388 213 141 132 129 213 157 244 342 593 498 257 157 313 328 Total 516 1244 1701 824 145 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 12 4442 5 0 56 4442 8760 3-15 TABLE 3-3 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 60m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: Stability Class E Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
60_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Slightly Stable 60_SPD Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25 >25 Total 30 81 90 64 51 32 40 44 45 28 30 12 6 6 3 5 89 194 84 25 34 27 32 37 53 88 94 32 29 9 19 11 37 48 15 0 6 10 16 24 61 130 136 62 10 7 25 7 0 3 1 0 0 1 12 17 33 28 33 36 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 156 326 190 89 91 70 102 111 196 284 294 144 36 24 47 23 Total 567 847 594 167 16 3 2194 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 5 0 56 2194 8760 3-16 TABLE 3-3 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 60m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: 60_SPD Stability Class F Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
60_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Moderately Stable Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25 > 25 Total 19 83 79 51 32 28 15 23 24 18 11 3 3 0 4 4 97 175 47 11 4 9 7 8 20 38 25 3 3 1 3 10 5 8 2 0 1 0 4 1 2 12 16 9 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 267 128 62 37 37 26 33 46 69 52 18 6 1 8 16 Total 397 461 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period 63 5 1 0 927 Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 5 0 56 927 8760 3-17 TABLE 3-3 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 60m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: 60_SPD Stability Class G Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
60_WD Lapse: DT60-10A Delta Temperature Extremely Stable Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25 > 25 Total 13 24 35 20 15 5 14 6 7 7 1 1 1 1 1 2 65 109 20 5 4 2 1 10 19 15 14 2 1 0 0 4 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 80 140 55 25 19 7 15 16 26 31 19 6 2 1 3 6 Total 153 271 26 1 0 0 451 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 5 0 56 451 8760 0 3-18 TABLE 3-3 (Continued)
SSES JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF WIND SPEED AND WIND DIRECTION 60m VERSUS DELTA TEMPERATURE 60-10m FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014 (Continued)
Joint Frequency Distribution Hours at Each Wind Speed and Direction Summary of All Stability Classes Period of Record =Elevation:
Speed: Total Period 1/1/2014 00:00 -12/31/2014 23:00 Direction:
60_WD Lapse: DT60-10A 60 SPD Delta Temperature Wind Speed (mph)Wind Direction N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 1-4 4-8 8-13 13-19 19-25 > 25 Total 82 251 296 198 142 101 115 129 121 103 77 32 13 11 12 17 348 634 269 108 100 89 107 117 147 310 362 115 76 33 63 73 241 228 64 21 38 56 117 59 174 260 499 260 127 100 208 210 57 66 5 4 9 10 41 41 98 102 198 228 88 40 94 89 0 3 0 0 0 2 6 0 18 20 26 99 10 3 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 1 11 0 0 0 0 728 1182 634 331 289 258 386 346 562 797 1163 745 314 187 385 392 Total 1700 2951 2662 1170 198 Calm Hours not Included above for: Variable Direction Hours for: Invalid Hours for: Valid Hours for this Stability Class for: Total Hours for Period Total Period Total Period Total Period Total Period 18 8699 5 0 56 8699 8760 3-19 TABLE 3-4 2014 SSES Annual Relative Concentrations
-No Decay, Undepleted X/Q (sec/m 3)Miles Direction 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 From N 4.14E-06 7.77E-07 3.20E-07 1.67E-07 1.06E-07 3.86E-08 1.03E-08 4.90E-09 3.05E-09 2.13E-09 NNE 6.70E-06 1.33E-06 5.91E-07 3.17E-07 2.04E-07 7.53E-08 2.05E-08 1.01E-08 6.36E-09 4.53E-09 NE 1.64E-05 3.08E-06 1.41E-06 7.97E-07 5.27E-07 2.07E-07 6.25E-08 3.14E-08 2.02E-08 1.46E-08 ENE 3.78E-05 7.17E-06 3.49E-06 2.05E-06 1.36E-06 5.35E-07 1.54E-07 7.47E-08 4.84E-08 3.54E-08 E 1.81E-05 3.35E-06 1.46E-06 8.18E-07 5.44E-07 2.20E-07 6.86E-08 3.45E-08 2.22E-08 1.62E-08 ESE 1.08E-05 2.14E-06 9.58E-07 5.29E-07 3.49E-07 1.40E-07 3.81E-08 1.66E-08 1.06E-08 7.66E-09 SE 9.38E-06 1.85E-06 8.39E-07 4.69E-07 3.09E-07 1.25E-07 3.07E-08 1.12E-08 7.15E-09 5.11E-09 SSE 9.17E-06 1.80E-06 7.93E-07 4.43E-07 2.97E-07 1.27E-07 3.31E-08 1.18E-08 7.49E-09 5.36E-09 S 7.41E-06 1.56E-06 7.51E-07 4.31E-07 2.94E-07 1.34E-07 3.65E-08 1.24E-08 7.86E-09 5.59E-09 SSW 7.28E-06 1.46E-06 6.61E-07 3.70E-07 2.44E-07 9.99E-08 2.55E-08 9.56E-09 6.01E-09 4.26E-09 SW 5.87E-06 1.17E-06 5.44E-07 3.07E-07 2.04E-07 8.74E-08 2.18E-08 7.17E-09 4.46E-09 3.12E-09 WSW 3.13E-06 6.03E-07 2.79E-07 1.63E-07 1.11E-07 5.18E-08 1.59E-08 5.89E-09 2.99E-09 1.62E-09 W 1.33E-06 2.52E-07 1.08E-07 5.85E-08 3.81E-08 1.54E-08 4.06E-09 1.61E-09 9.89E-10 6.80E-10 WNW 1.14E-06 2.07E-07 8.22E-08 4.27E-08 2.71E-08 9.82E-09 2.60E-09 1.21E-09 7.38E-10 5.05E-10 NW 2.12E-06 3.92E-07 1.56E-07 7.92E-08 5.01E-08 1.79E-08 4.66E-09 2.18E-09 1.34E-09 9.19E-10 NNW 2.74E-06 5.08E-07 2.13E-07 1.13E-07 7.OSE-08 2.41E-08 5.87E-09 2.75E-09 1.69E-09 1.16E-09~0 TABLE 3-5 2014 SSES Annual Relative Concentrations
-2.26-Day Decay, Undepleted XIQ (seClM3)Miles Direction 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 From N 4.13E-06 7.73E-07 3.17E-07 1.65E-07 1.05E-07 3.77E-08 9.77E-09 4.49E-09 2.69E-09 1.81E-09 NNE 6.69E-06 1.32E-06 5.85E-07 3.12E-07 2.01E-07 7.30E-08 1.93E-08 9.03E-09 5.47E-09 3.73E-09 NE 1.63E-05 3.06E-06 1.39E-06 7.82E-07 5.14E-07 1.99E-07 5.75E-08 2.73E-08 1.66E-08 1.14E-08 ENE 3.77E-05 7.10E-06 3.44E-06 2.01E-06 1.33E-06 5.12E-07 1.41E-07 6.46E-08 3.95E-08 2.73E-08 E 1.80E-05 3.32E-06 1.44E706 7.98E-07 5.28E-07 2.09E-07 6.20E-08 2.91E-08 1.75E-08 1.19E-08 ESE 1.08E-05 2.12E-06 9.42E-07 5.17E-07 3.39E-07 1.33E-07 3.45E-08 1.41E-08 8.43E-09 5.68E-09 SE 9.36E-06 1.84E-06 8.27E-07 4.59E-07 3.01E-07 1.19E-07 2.80E-08 9.67E-09 5.79E-09 3.90E-09 SSE 9.15E-06 1.78E-06 7.83E-07 4.35E-07 2.90E-07 1.22E-07 3.04E-08 1.02E-08 6.17E-09 4.18E-09 S 7.39E-06 1.55E-06 7.43E-07 4.25E-07 2.88E-07 1.30E-07 3.42E-08 1.11E-08 6.75E-09 4.60E-09 SSW 7.27E-06 1.45E-06 6.55E-07 3.66E-07 2.40E-07 9.73E-08 2.42E-08 8.76E-09 5.32E-09 3.64E-09 SW 5.86E-06 1.16E-06 5.40E-07 3.04E-07 2.01E-07 8.56E-08 2.09E-08 6.68E-09 4.04E-09 2.75E-09 WSW 3.12E-06 6.01E-07 2.77E-07 1.62E-07 1.10E-07 5.08E-08 1.53E-08 5.49E-09 2.71E-09 1.43E-09 W 1.33E-06 2.51E-07 1.07E-07 5.79E-08 3.76E-08 1.51E-08 3.90E-09 1.51E-09 9.OOE-10 6.03E-10 WNW 1.14E-06 2.06E-07 8.16E-08 4.23E-08 2.67E-08 9.62E-09 2.49E-09 1.13E-09 6.69E-10 4.45E-10 NW 2.11E-06 3.90E-07 1.55E-07 7.84E-08 4.95E-08 1.75E-08 4.46E-09 2.03E-09 1.21E-09 8.09E-10 NNW 2.73E-06 5.07E-07 2.12E-07 1.12E-07 6.97E-08 2.37E-08 5.65E-09 2.58E-09 1.54E-09 1.03E-09 3-21 TABLE 3-6 2014 SSES Annual Relative Concentrations Day Decay, Depleted X/Q (sec/m3)Miles Direction 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 From N 3.78E-06 6.58E-07 2.59E-07 1.30E-07 7.98E-08 2.69E-08 6.35E-09 2.64E-09 1.47E-09 9.34E-10 NNE 6.12E-06 1.12E-06 4.78E-07 2.46E-07 1.53E-07 5.24E-08 1.26E-08 5.39E-09 3.05E-09 1.97E-09 NE 1.50E-05 2.61E-06 1.14E-06 6.17E-07 3.94E-07 1.44E-07 3.82E-08 1.67E-08 9.56E-09 6.27E-09 ENE 3.45E-05 6.06E-06 2.82E-06 1.58E-06 1.02E-06 3.71E-07 9.43E-08 3.96E-08 2.29E-08 1.51E-08 E 1.65E-05 2.84E-06 1.18E-06 6.31E-07 4.06E-07 1.52E-07 4.18E-08 1.82E-08 1.04E-08 6.81E-09 ESE 9.91E-06 1.81E-06 7.73E-07 4.09E-07 2.61E-07 9.65E-08 2.32E-08 8.77E-09 4.99E-09 3.23E-09 SE 8.57E-06 1.57E-06 6.77E-07 3.63E-07 2.31E-07 8.63E-08 1.87E-08 5.95E-09 3.37E-09 2.18E-09 SSE 8.38E-06 1.52E-06 6.41E-07 3.43E-07 2.22E-07 8.81E-08 2.02E-08 6.25E-09 3.55E-09 2.30E-09 S 6.77E-06 1.32E-06 6.07E-07 3.34E-07 2.20E-07 9.34E-08 2.24E-08 6.66E-09 3.77E-09 2.43E-09 SSW 6.65E-06 1.23E-06 5.34E-07 2.87E-07 1.83E-07 6.95E-08 1.57E-08 5.15E-09 2.91E-09 1.87E-09 SW 5.36E-06 9.88E-07 4.40E-07 2.38E-07 1.53E-07 6.09E-08 1.35E-08 3.88E-09 2.17E-09 1.38E-09 WSW 2.86E-06 5.11E-07 2.26E-07 1.27E-07 8.33E-08 3.61E-08 9.85E-09 3.19E-09 1.45E-09 7.17E-10 W 1.21E-06 2.13E-07 8.71E-08 4.53E-08 2.86E-08 1.07E-08 2.51E-09 8.75E-10 4.82E-10 3.02E-10 WNW 1.04E-06 1.75E-07 6.65E-08 3.31E-08 2.03E-08 6.85E-09 1.61E-09 6.55E-10 3.59E-10 2.24E-10 NW 1.93E-06 3.32E-07 1.26E-07 6.14E-08 3.76E-08 1.25E-08 2.88E-09 1.18E-09 6.50E-10 4.07E-10 NNW 2.50E-06 4.31E-07 1.72E-07 8.74E-08 5.29E-08 1.68E-08 3.64E-09 1.49E-09 8.23E-10 5.16E-10 3-22 9 0 TABLE 3-7 2014 SSES Annual Relative Concentrations
-DIQ (m-2)Miles Direction 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 From N 2.80E-08 4.12E-09 1.69E-09 8.01E-10 4.74E-10 1.50E-10 3.59E-11 1.32E-11 7.06E-12 4.43E-12 NNE 2.95E-08 4.56E-09 1.98E-09 9.41E-10 5.54E-10 1.73E-10 4.03E-11 1.48E-11 7.91E-12 4.97E-12 NE 4.11E-08 6.20E-09 2.65E-09 1.28E-09 7.61E-10 2.45E-10 6.01E-11 2.21E-11 1.18E-11 7.42E-12 ENE 6.40E-08 9.94E-09 4.43E-09 2.17E-09 1.28E-09 4.05E-10 9.23E-11 3.24E-11 1.73E-11 1.08E-11 E 3.24E-08 4.74E-09 1.93E-09 9.22E-10 5.50E-10 1.81E-10 4.59E-11 1.69E-11 9.03E-12 5.67E-12 ESE 2.53E-08 3.83E-09 1.63E-09 7.88E-10 4.71E-10 1.56E-10 3.55E-11 1.15E-11 6.11E-12 3.84E-12 SE 2.90E-08 4.41E-09 1.93E-09 9.52E-10 5.71E-10 1.93E-10 4.02E-11 1.10E-11 5.87E-12 3.69E-12 SSE 3.OOE-08 4.48E-09 1.91E-09 9.43E-10 5.75E-10 2.06E-10 4.51E-11 1.20E-11 6.40E-12 4.02E-12 S 3.25E-08 5.21E-09 2.45E-09 1.26E-09 7.84E-10 3.03E-10 7.08E-11 1.82E-11 9.69E-12 6.09E-12 SSW 3.90E-08 5.97E-09 2.68E-09 1.35E-09 8.20E-10 2.86E-10 6.35E-11 1.81E-11 9.68E-12 6.08E-12 SW 4.64E-08 7.37E-09 3.47E-09 1.80E-09 1.11E-09 4.17E-10 9.42E-11 2.40E-11 1.28E-11 8.05E-12 WSW 2.80E-08 4.32E-09 2.02E-09 1.08E-09 6.87E-10 2.83E-10 7.97E-11 2.30E-11 1.01E-11 4.95E-12 W 1.13E-08 1.70E-09 7.34E-10 3.66E-10 2.23E-10 7.99E-11 1.95E-11 6.11E-12 3.26E-12 2.05E-12 WNW 8.99E-09 1.30E-09 5.22E-10 2.50E-10 1.48E-10 4.81E-11 1.19E-11 4.37E-12 2.33E-12 1.47E-12 NW 1.78E-08 2.60E-09 1.04E-09 4.85E-10 2.87E-10 9.10E-11 2.18E-11 8.04E-12 4.29E-12 2.69E-12 NNW 2.44E-08 3.63E-09 1.53E-09 7.41E-10 4.34E-10 1.32E-10 2.98E-11 1.10E-11 5.85E-12 3.68E-12 3-23 TABLE 3-8 2014 ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION ESTIMATES FOR RETDAS INPUT AT SELECTED LOCATIONS X/Q DEC+AFFECTED (1) (2) (3) (4)SECTOR LOCATION MILES XIQ X/Q DEC DEP DEPOSITION 11/SW Maximum (X/Q) Site 0.61 1.21 E-05 1.20E-05 1.09E-05 2.92E-08 Boundary 9/S Closest (X/Q) Site Boundary 0.38 6.28E-06 6.27E-06 5.85E-06 4.51 E-08 12/WSW Maximum (X/Q) Residence 1.3 8.89E-06 8.82E-06 7.60E-06 1.27E-08 16 / NNW Maximum (D/Q) Residence 0.6 6.99E-06 6.96E-06 6.30E-06 2.19E-08 7 / SE Maximum (D/Q) Garden 0.6 1.60E-06 1.59E-06 1.44E-06 1.29E-08 12/WSW Maximum (D/Q) Dairy 1.7 6.01 E-06 5.95E-06 5.03E-06 8.16E-09 15 / NW Maximum (D/Q) Meat 0.9 3.91E-06 3.93E-06 3.45E-06 1.06E-08 Producer 3/NE Riverlands
/ EIC 0.7 3.58E-06 3.57E-06 3.19E-06 2.64E-08 12 / WSW Tower's Club 0.5 3.77E-05 3.76E-05 3.44E-05 6.39E-08 NEAREST RESIDENCE WITHIN A 5-MILE RADIUS BY SECTOR SECTOR AFFECTED X/Q DEC NUMBER SECTOR NAME MILES X/Q X/Q DEC +DEP DEPOSITION 1 N H. Burd 1.3 1.91 E-06 1.90E-06 1.63E-06 6.62E-09 2 NNE E. Ashbridge III I 2.63E-06 2.62E-06 2.29E-06 1.1 9E-08 3 NE W. Tuggle 0.9 2.47E-06 2.46E-06 2.17E-06 1.74E-08 4 ENE R. Ditkosky/T.
Davis 2.1 3.63E-07 3.61 E-07 2.98E-07 2.62E-09 5 E L. Kozlowski 1.4 2.80E-07 2.79E-07 2.38E-07 1.91E-09 6 ESE R. Panetta 0.5 1.14E-06 1.14E-06 1.04E-06 8.97E-09 7 SE J. Futoma 0.5 2.11E-06 2.11E-06 1.93E-06 1.77E-08 8 SSE M. Naunczek 0.6 2.07E-06 2.06E-06 1.87E-06 1.78E-08 9 S S. Slusser 1 1.44E-06 1.44E-06 1.25E-06 8.36E-09 10 SSW S. Molnar 0.9 2.81 E-06 2.80E-06 2.47E-06 1.09E-08 11 SW F. Michael 1.5 3.08E-06 3.06E-06 2.61 E-06 6.21E-09 12 WSW F. Michael 1.3 8.89E-06 8.82E-06 7.60E-06 1.27E-08 13 W F. Hummel 1.2 4.72E-06 4.68E-06 4.05E-06 7.01E-09 14 WNW J. Confer 1.1 3.35E-06 3.37E-06 2.92E-06 6.53E-09 15 NW C. McGraw, Jr. 0.8 5.40E-06 5.37E-06 4.77E-06 1.13E-08 16 NNW G. John 0.6 6.99E-06 6.96E-06 6.30E-06 2.19E-08 NEAREST GARDEN WITHIN A 5-MILE RADIUS BY SECTOR SECTOR AFFECTED NAME MILES X/Q X/Q DEC X/Q DEC DEPOSITION NUMBER SECTOR +DEP I N B. J. Wojcik 3.2 4.98E-07 4.92E-07 3.90E-07 1.50E-09 2 NNE R. Chapin 2.3 7.48E-07 7.42E-07 6.10E-07 3.05E-09 3 NE M. Welch 2.7 4.77E-07 4.74E-07 3.82E-07 2.98E-09 4 ENE G. Dennis 2.4 2.97E-07 2.95E-07 2.41 E-07 2.15E-09 5 E J. Brown 4.3 4.07E-08 4.11E-08 3.11E-08 2.44E-10 6 ESE B. Hoffman 3.1 5.41 E-08 5.36E-08 4.26E-08 3.26E-10 7 SE T. Scholl 0.6 1.60E-06 1.59E-06 1.44E-06 1.29E-08 8 SSE H. Roinick 2.9 1.61E-07 1.60E-07 1.28E-07 1.11E-09 9 S R. Houck 3.1 2.09E-07 2.11E-07 1.66E-07 1.05E-09 10 SSW S. Bodnar 1.3 1.63E-06 1.64E-06 1.40E-06 5.82E-09 11 SW R. Broody 1.9 2.14E-06 2.12E-06 1.77E-06 4.19E-09 12 WSW F. Michael 1.3 8.89E-06 8.82E-06 7.60E-06 1.27E-08 13 W R. White 2.0 2.07E-06 2.10E-06 1.73E-06 2.86E-09 14 WNW P. Moskaluk 1.3 2.64E-06 2.61 E-06 2.25E-06 4.90E-09 15 NW T. Dawson 0.9 3.91 E-06 3.93E-06 3.45E-06 1.06E-08 16 NNW P. Culver 4 3.58E-07 3.50E-07 2.72E-07 7.24E-10 3-24 TABLE 3-8 (Continued)
NEAREST ANIMAL RAISED FOR MEAT CONSUMPTION WITHIN A 5-MILE RADIUS BY SECTOR SECTOR AFFECTED NAME MILES XIQ XIQ DEC X/Q DEPOSITION NUMBER SECTOR DEC+DEP 2 NNE R. Chapin 2.3 7.42E-07 7.48E-07 6.10E-07 3.05E-09 4 ENE G. Dennis 2.4 2.95E-07 2.97E-07 2.41 E-07 2.14E-09 5 E J. Bloss 4.5 3.81E-08 3.76E-08 2.85E-08 2.23E-10 10 SSW K. Davis 14 2.33E-08 2.20E-08 1.45E-08 4.65E-1I 12 WSW T. & M. Berger 1.7 6.01 E-06 5.95E-06 5.03E-06 8.16E-09 15 NW T. Dawson 0.9 3.91E-06 3.93E-06 3.45E-06 1.06E-08 ALL DAIRY LOCATIONS SECTOR AFFECTED NAME MILES X/Q X/Q DEC XJQ DEPOSITION NUMBER SECTOR DEC+DEP 5 E J. Bloss 4.5 3.81 E-08 3.76E-08 2.85E-08 2.23E-10 10 SSW K. Davis 14 2.33E-08 2.20E-08 1.45E-08 4.65E-1 1 12 WSW T. & M. Berger 1.7 6.01E-06 5.95E-06 5.03E-06 8.16E-09 13 W J. & N. Dent 5 4.50E-07 4.35E-07 3.31 E-07 4.37E-10 I X/Q RELATIVE CONCENTRATION (SEC/M)2 X/Q DEC DECAYED AND UNDEPLETED, HALF-LIFE 2.26 DAYS 3 X/Q DEC+DEP DECAYED AND DEPLETED, HALF-LIFE 8 DAYS (SEC/M )4 DEPOSITION RELATIVE DEPOSITION RATE (I/M)3-25 FIGURE 3-1 2014 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 10M LEVEL -PRIMARY TOWER 0 Run Date: 1/22/2015 2:40:12 PM WIND ROSE (WINDS FROM)N 0.23% PERCENT CALMS (NOT INCLUDED IN PLOT)Start Date: 11112014 00:00 End Date: 12/3112014 23:00 Sensors Selected -1Q.SPD 10..WD Legend AWIND SPEED LESS THAN .5 MPH* WIND SPEED LESS THAN 7.5 MPH A WIND SPEED LESS THAN 125 MPH WIND SPEED GREATER THAN 125MPH This wind rose displays the frequency of hourly average wind direction from a given sector. In 2014, the predominant wind direction occurred 13.7 % of the time from the ENE sector. The average wind speed was 5.1 mph and the average wind speed for the predominant sector (ENE) was 2.6 mph. The sector with the highest average wind speed was SW (8.9 mph).3-26 FIGURE 3-2 2014 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 60M LEVEL -PRIMARY TOWER Run Date: 1/22/2015 2:40:43 PM WIND ROSE CWINDS FROM)N'1'0.27% PERCENT CALMS (NOT INCLUDED IN PLOT)Start Date: 111/2014 00:00 End Date: 1213112014 23:00-Sensors Selected ....60..SPD Legend a WIND SPEED LESS THAN a5 MPH A WIND SPEED LESS THAN 7.5 MPH o VWND SPEED LESS THAN 12.5MPH WIND SPEED GREATER THAN 125MPH This wind rose displays the frequency of hourly average wind direction from a given sector. In 2014, the predominant wind direction occurred 13.6 % of the time from the NNE sector. The average wind speed was 7.9 mph and the average wind speed for the predominant sector (NNE) was 6.1 mph. The sector with the highest average wind speed was WSW (12.4 mph.).3-27 FIGURE 3-3 PASQUIL STABILITY CLASS PREVALENCES DATA Period: 2014 Joint Frequency Distributions at 10 Meters Wind Speed and Direction 1OM vs. Delta Temperature 60-1OM (Based on 8,760 Valid Hours)G 5.18% A 1.02% B 1.80%G \ I C 5.05%f MA 1B3 MC ED ME OF NlG 3-28 SECTION 4 DOSE MEASUREMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS 4-1 Radiological Impact on Man Sampling and analysis of airborne and waterborne effluents were performed in accordance with the frequencies, types of analysis, and Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) outlined in the PPL Susquehanna, LLC Technical Requirements Manual.Radioactive material was detected in some of the airborne and waterborne effluent samples analyzed.
Dose calculations using measured and calculated effluent activity levels, meteorological data from the current reporting period and average river flow dilution factors resulted in estimated doses to individuals at levels below 10 CFR 20 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix I limits. Direct radiation resulting from plant operation (reported in the 2014 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report) contributed a maximum of 7.31 E-1 mrem (measured at location 9S2 and based on an occupancy time by a member of the public of 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br /> per quarter) at the Protected Area Boundary south of the plant. Based on airborne effluent sample data, the maximum organ (including thyroid)/total body dose is 2.17E-1 mrem (CHILD, LUNG Table 4-4). The maximum organ/total body dose from all liquid effluent is 3.94E-3 mrem (ADULT, GILLI Table 4-2). Conservatively adding the maximum organ/total body dose from liquid and gaseous effluent and the maximum total body dose determined from direct radiation results in a dose of 9.52E-1 mrem, which is 3.8% of the 40CFR1 90 limit of 25 mrem to total body/organ (except thyroid) and 1.3% of the 40CFR1 90 limit of 75 mrem to the thyroid.Doses to a maximally exposed member of the public from waterborne effluents are calculated for fish ingestion and shoreline exposure at the plant outfall, and drinking W water ingestion at Danville, PA. Site specific parameters used in the calculations for the Danville receiver, specific for actual average blowdown and river level for the entire year are shown in Table 4-1.TABLE 4-1 SITE-SPECIFIC PARAMETERS USED FOR RETDAS CALCULATIONS (DANVILLE RECEIVER)FOR 2014 PARAMETER ENTIRE YEAR Cooling Tower Bfowdown (CFS) 26.1 Average Net River Level (ft.) 6.8 Dilution Factor at Danville0l) 413.2 Transit time to Danville (hr.)(') 24.7 (1)From ODCM-QA-005, Att. E 0 4-2 Summaries of maximum individual doses resulting from airborne and waterborne radioactive effluent releases from each unit are given in Table 4-2. Meteorological data from Section 3 were used to calculate the dose from airborne effluents.
The Radioactive Effluent Release Report includes an assessment of the radiation dose from radioactive effluents to members of the public within the site boundary.Within the Site Boundary there are several areas frequented by members of the public. There are no significant exposure pathways from waterborne effluents in these areas. Doses from airborne effluent are calculated for members of the public for the following locations:
Riverlands Energy Information Center, the Towers Club, and residence with the maximum X/Q value; the garden, dairy and meat producing farm with the maximum D/Q value; and the site boundary with the maximum X/Q value. Summaries of the calculated maximum doses within the site boundary and selected locations beyond the site boundary resulting from airborne effluents are presented in Table 4-4. The above referenced locations are shown on Figure 4-1.In the area comprising the Riverlands recreation area, which surrounds the Energy Information Center, three pathways of radiation exposure can be identified:
plume, ground, and inhalation.
There are no significant exposure pathways from waterborne effluents in this area. There are approximately 100,000 visitors to the Riverlands/Energy Information Center complex each year. For dose calculations, it is assumed the visitor stays in the area for one hour. The calculated dose rate and collective dose for visitors to the Riverlands/Energy Information Center during 2014 are shown on Table 4-3.Use of the RETDAS code yields calculated doses for the Riverlands area for the report period. These doses assume an occupancy factor of 100% for a member of the public during 2014. These calculated dose values are shown on Table 4-4.In Regulatory Guide 1.21, Revision 2, "Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactive Material in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents and Solid Waste", the NRC has recommended that U.S. nuclear power plants evaluate whether Carbon-14 (C-14) is a "principal radionuclide", and if so, report the amount of C-14 released.Radioactive effluent releases of C-14 have not increased but the decline in releases of other radionuclides has resulted in C-14 possibly becoming more prominent, specifically in airborne effluents.
This regulatory guidance has led to an industry initiative to evaluate and report C-14 in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report.Information for C-14 dose impact is included as supplemental information in this report. Reportable values for dose impact do not include C-14 contribution.
C-14, with a half-life of 5730 years, is a naturally occurring isotope of carbon produced by cosmic ray interactions in the atmosphere.
Nuclear weapons testing in the 1950s and 1960s significantly increased the amount of C-14 in the atmosphere.
C-14 is also produced in commercial nuclear reactors, but the amounts produced are much less than those produced naturally or from weapons testing.4-3 In December 2010 the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) published Report 1021106, "Estimation of Carbon-14 in Nuclear Power Plant Gaseous Effluents", which provides conservative technical guidance to support the calculation of C-14 released in radioactive effluents.
In a BWR the majority of C-14 is generated in the reactor core by neutron activation of reactor coolant, specifically 1 7 0(n,a) 14C. Thus C-14 generation is directly proportional to reactor power. As documented in the EPRI report (for a BWR), approximately 99% of the C-14 produced in the reactor core is discharged as gaseous effluent (primarily as C02) through the offgas system. The remaining 1 % is released in the form of solid radwaste.
There is minimal (<1%) C-14 released in the liquid effluent pathway.In October of 2012 PPL Susquehanna, in conjunction with an offsite lab, performed sampling and analysis for airborne effluent C-14 released from the station via each units offgas system.Since both Susquehanna units are essentially identical in reactor design, a single value for the C-14 release rate (in the C02 form from the offgas system sample results) is used in the calculation of C-14 released from each unit. The release rate value is corrected to 100% power then scaled to the fraction of full power year for each unit. The fraction of a full power year is calculated as the Effective Full Power Days for the year in question divided by 365 to get the fraction of effective vs full year operation.
Based on the above outlined methodology, approximately 42 Curies of C-14 were released in gaseous effluents in 2014.The airborne effluent pathway with the highest offsite dose potential (for C-14 releases) is the vegetation ingestion pathway. The maximum expected annual dose from C-14 released from Susquehanna Unit-I (3.63E-1 mrem) and Unit-2 (3.89E-1 mrem) has been calculated based on methodology in Regulatory Guide 1.109 and includes site specific parameters (e.g., nearest garden with highest X/Q value, producing both broad leaf and non-broad leaf vegetation).
The maximum organ dose from airborne effluent C-14 released from the Susquehanna station in 2014 is well below the IOCFR50, Appendix I, ALARA design objective (i.e., 15 mrem/yr per unit). The annual dose to the maximally exposed individual from all gaseous releases of C-14 (calculated by the above referenced methodology) is 7.52E-1 mrem to the critical organ (bone) and 1.50E-1 mrem to the total body.Conservatively adding the maximum dose (calculated based on liquid and gaseous effluent sample results combined with direct radiation results) referenced on page 4-2 to the maximum dose due to the calculated release of C-14 (7.52E-1 mrem, CHILD, BONE) bounds the dose that any member of the public receives from station operations to 1.70 mrem, which is 6.8% of the 40CFRI 90 limit of 25 mrem to total body/organ (except thyroid) and 2.3% of the 40CFR1 90 limit of 75 mrem to the thyroid.4-4 TABLE 4-2
SUMMARY
OF MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL DOSES TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC (4)DATA PERIOD: 111114 TO 12/31/14 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM LIMIT AGE APPLICABLE DOSE PERCENT (MREM/UNIT EFFLUENT GROUP ORGAN (MREM/MRAD)
LOCATION OF LIMIT MRAD)(2)DIST AFFECTED (MILES) SECTOR 1 Liquid() Teen Total Body 1.31E-03 (3) 0.04 3 1 Liquid(')
Adult GILLI 1.97E-03 (3) 0.02 10 1 Noble Gas N/A Air Dose 1.88E-02 0.5 WSW 0.2 10 (Gamma-MRAD)1 Noble Gas N/A Air Dose 6.81E-03 0.5 WSW 0.03 20 (Beta-MRAD) 1 Airborne Child Liver 1.55E-01 0.5 WSW 1.03 15 Iodine, Tritium and Particulates 2 Liquid(')
Teen Total Body 1.31E-03 (3) 0.04 3 Liquid(')
Adult GiLLI 1.97E-03 (3) 0.02 10 2 Noble Gas N/A Air Dose 6.57E-02 0.5 WSW 0:66 10 (Gamma-MRAD)2 Noble Gas N/A Air Dose 2.35E-02 0.5 WSW 0.12 20 (Beta-MRAD) 2 Airborne Child Liver 6.26E-02 0.5 WSW 0.42 15 Iodine, Tritium and Particulates (1)Estimated dose is based on a site total activity release equally divided between Unit 1 and Unit 2.(2)10 CFR 50, Appendix I limits are in terms of mrad or mrem/reactor-year for airborne and waterborne effluent from each unit.(3)Doses from liquid effluent are estimated from fish ingestion and shoreline exposure at the site outfall and from the drinking water pathway at Danville, PA.(4)Dose due to calculated release of C-14 not included.0 4-5 TABLE 4-3 CALCULATED COLLECTIVE DOSES TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE RIVERLANDS/ENERGY INFORMATION CENTER COMPLEX DATA PERIOD: 1/1114 TO 12/31/14 COLLECTIVE APPLICABLE DOSE RATE(1) DOStE(2,)1 EFFLUENT AGE GROUP ORGAN '(MREMiHR) (PERSON-REM)
Noble Gas N/A Total Body 9.16E-07 9.16E-05 Noble Gas N/A Skin 3.28E-07 3.28E-05 Iodine, Tritium and Child GI-LLI 2.48E-06 2.48E-04 Particulates (3)(1)Estimated dose and dose rate is based on annual site total activity release.(2)Collective dose is based on 100,000 person-hours.
(3) Dose due to calculated release of C-14 not included.
4 TABLE 4-4
SUMMARY
OF MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL DOSES FROM AIRBORNE EFFLUENT MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MAXIMUM TOTAL BODY ORGAN THYROID DOSE DOSE DOSE LOCATION PATHWAY (MREM) (MREM) (MREM)1. Maximum site boundary X/Q Total (All) 7.OOE-02 (CHILD) 7.01 E-02 (CHILD, LUNG) 6.99E-02 (CHILD)2. Maximum D/Q Garden Total (All) 9.70E-03 (CHILD) 9.73E-03 (CHILD,GI-LLI) 9.66E-03 (CHILD)3. Maximum D/Q Dairy +Total (All) 3.45E-02 (CHILD) 3.45E-02 (CHILD, LUNG) 3.44E-02 (CHILD)4. Tower's Club Total (All) 2.17E-01 (CHILD) 2.17E-01 (CHILD, LUNG) 2.17E-01 (CHILD)5. Riverland/EIC Total (All) 2.16E-02 (CHILD) 2.17E-02 (CHILD,GI-LLI) 2.15E-02 (CHILD)6. Maximum XIQ Residence Total (All) 5.10E-02 (CHILD) 5.11E-02 (CHILD, LUNG) 5.10E-02 (CHILD)7. Maximum D/Q Meat Total (All) 2.27E-02 (CHILD) 2.27E-02 (CHILD,GI-LLI).
2.27E-02 (CHILD)Note: The doses shown above are based on 100% occupancy at the indicated locations.
They are based on a composite of all pathways resulting in a total dose to the maximally exposed individual due to airborne effluents from both Unit-1 and Unit-2 operations.
Dose due to calculated release of C-14 not included.4-6 FIGURE 4-1 AIRBORNE-DOSE CALCULATION LOCATIONS 9' 16-NNWSS40N
'S 4 12- IsvN " ..I E Indicates airborne-dose calculation location per Table 4-4 4-7 SECTION 5 CHANGES TO THE OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM), TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL (TRM)AND THE SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM 5-1 CHANGES TO THE OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL The PPL Susquehanna, LLC ODCM consists of nine (9) individual procedures.
There were no changes to any of the ODCM procedures in 2014.5-2 CHANGES TO THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL Section 3.11 and 3.6.1 of the Unit-1 and Unit-2 Technical Requirements Manual (TRM)by reference are part of the ODCM. The following limits and requirements are contained in Section 3.11: liquid and gaseous effluent dose limits, liquid and gaseous effluent treatment system operability criteria (based on effluent dose), liquid and gaseous effluent treatment system operability criteria and the conduct of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. Section 3.6.1 contains requirements for venting or purging of primary containment.
There were no changes to TRM Sections 3.6.1 or 3.11 during 2014.5-3 PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM CHANGES The following changes were made to the Process Control Program and implementing procedures during 2014. None of the changes reduce the overall conformance of the solidified waste product to existing criteria for solid wastes. All changes were reviewed and approved by PORC (as necessary) as documented on the attached summary of procedure changes. The following procedures were changed: WM-RP-012 WM-RP-009 SC-068-002 HANDLING AND USE OF STEEL LINERS AND HIGH INTEGRITY CONTAINERS COMBUSTIBLE GAS CHECK AND CLOSURE OF PROCESSING LINERS AND HIGH INTEGRITY CONTAINERS SOLID RADWASTE SAMPLE TEST SOLIDIFICATION EVALUATION FOR INCONTAINER SOLIDIFICATION NDAP-QA-0646 continues to fully implement the requirements and intent of the following:
- 1. Section 11.4 and 13.5 of the FSAR 2. Section 3.7.4 of the Technical Requirements Manual 3. 3. 10 CFR 20, 10 CFR 61, 10 CFR 71,49 CFR 100-177, and 40 CFR 261 Compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements listed above continues to be met as the result of these changes to the program. These changes to the Process Control Program will not reduce the overall conformance of the solidified waste product to existing criteria for solid wastes.5-4 PROCEDURE REVISION SUMMARIES WM-RP-012 HANDLING AND USE OF STEEL LINERS AND HIGH INTEGRITY CONTAINERS
- 1. Revised section 6.2.13.a slings to lift 14-195 liners are now a maximum of 100 inches long.2. Revised Attachment C. Maximum lengths of slings used to lift containers are listed.3. Revised Attachment C. Maximum length of sling to lift L14-195 containers is 100 inches.4. Added 6.2.10 Verify lid and container match marks are aligned.WM-RP-009 COMBUSTIBLE GAS CHECK AND CLOSURE OF PROCESSING LINERS AND HIGH INTEGRITY CONTAINERS
- 1. Eliminated requirement to release the four lock levers prior to removing closure tool -Section 6.5.5(f).2. MSA Altair 5X Air Monitor replaced PHD5 -Section 3.SC-068-002 SOLID RADWASTE SAMPLE TEST SOLIDIFICATION EVALUATION FOR INCONTAINER SOLIDIFICATION
- 1. PER CRA 1496616, this Procedure is upgraded to the new procedure format in accordance with NDAP-QA-0008, Procedure Format and Content.2. Cover Page Updated procedure owner to the Chemistry Department.
- 3. AR 1587537 -SC-068-002 can be used as written; however, an enhancement should be made to change the level of use to Reference Use as determined by Chem lab supervision to comply with the newest Rev of NDAP-QA-0029.
- 4. Deleted Attachment A. Added information in the body of the procedure.
- 5. Deleted CH-RC-051 reference.
5-5 SECTION 6 MISCELLANEOUS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL (TRM), FSAR, 40CFRI90 AND NEI GROUNDWATER PROTECTION INITIATIVE REPORTING 6-1
- 1. TRM Action 3.11.1.4.F.2 required the reporting of Liquid Radwaste Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation inoperability not corrected in a timely manner.The Liquid Radwaste Discharge Radiation Monitor was declared inoperable at 1112 on 12/26/13 (requiring entry into TRO 3.11.1.4 Condition B) due to required maintenance on the monitor canister.
Multiple attempts were made to return the monitor to service but problems were discovered with the detector microprocessor.
Replacement parts were ordered to make the needed repairs. TRO 3.11.1.4 Condition F was entered at 1112 on 1/25/14 due to exceeding the 30 day return to service requirement of TRO 3.11.1.4 Condition B. The Liquid Radwaste Discharge Radiation Monitor was repaired and declared operable at 1041 on 2/6/14.2. TRM Action 3.11.1.5.C.1 requires the reporting of Radioactive Liquid Process Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation inoperability not corrected in a timely manner, or if required sampling/analysis was not performed during the inoperable period.None to report for 2014.3. TRM Action 3.11.2.6.K requires an explanation for Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation required actions and completion times not met.None to report for 2014.4. TRM Action 3.11.4.1 .F.2 requires reporting the cause of the unavailability of milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples and identify the new locations for obtaining replacements.
None to report for 2014.5. TRM Action 3.11.4.2.A requires reporting when land use census identifies a new location which yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in Requirement 3.11.2.3 (Gaseous Effluent Dose due to Iodine, Tritium, and Radionuclides in Particulate Form).None to report for 2014.6. TRM Action 3.11.4.2.B requires reporting when land use census identifies locations that yield a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with Requirement 3.11.4.1 (Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program).None to report for 2014.6-2
- 7. The limits outlined in 40CFRI90.10 (Environmental Standards for the Uranium Fuel Cycle-Standards for Normal Operations) were not exceeded by station operations during 2014. Refer to Section 2 and Section 4 for specific values.8. FSAR Section 11.6.11 requires the reporting of airborne radioactivity detected in the Low Level Radwaste Holding Facility.Only naturally occurring airborne radioactivity was detected above analysis MDC's in air samples from the Low Level Radwaste Holding Facility during 2014.9. The PPL Susquehanna station has implemented an Action Plan in response to the NEI Initiative on Groundwater Protection.
Part of the Action Plan includes the assessment of the current groundwater monitoring program.Groundwater is sampled and analyzed quarterly as part of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP). REMP groundwater sampling locations are defined in ODCM-QA-008 Attachment G. In August 2006, additional groundwater sampling was initiated at locations which are not listed in the ODCM. The additional locations are three manholes which collect water from a perimeter drain system. The perimeter drain system consists of perforated piping installed just above the footing along the exterior base of the vertical walls of the reactor, turbine and radwaste buildings.
Outlined in Table 6-1 are the tritium analysis results from sampling of the perimeter drain system. No nuclear by-product gamma emitting radionuclides were identified above analysis MDC's for the perimeter drain samples in 2014. The tritium results reported in Table 6-1 did not exceed any Reporting Level thresholds in the PPL Susquehanna Technical Requirements Manual or any reporting criteria established in response to the NEI Groundwater Protection Initiative.
Figure 6-1 is a trend graph of airborne and waterborne effluent tritium releases from the PPL Susquehanna Station starting in 1982.6-3 TABLE 6-1 NEI Ground Water Protection Initiative Reporting Perimeter Drain Sampling Results: 2014 Manhole FD-A Manhole FD-2 Manhole FD-3 (16S3- NW corner (9S3 -I/S RCA @ U2 (7S9 -E of U2 CST) of RW Bldg.) HP Cont. Pt. Closet)Date Tritium (pCilliter)
Tritium (pCilliter)
Tritium (pCi/liter) 02/14/2014 237 235 176 05/1912014 198 166 141 08/1812014 198 <MDC <MDC 11/17/2014 252 166 160 F<MDC = Less than Minimum Detectable Concentration 6-4 Figure 6-1 SSES Tritium Effluent Releases (Airborne, Waterborne
& Total Curies Released)250 -200-Cu~ 50 -:I- CO w COO 0)0) ) 0 ) 00 00 0 N ,I M0 W- M0 W- M- M- " M M 0 CD C 0 T- V- C M 0' mb m" mb m' m" m m m CD o CD 0 0 0 0 0 Year --Airborne H-3--m-Waterborne H-3--Total Curies 6-5 SECTION 7 CORRECTIONS TO PREVIOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORTS 7-1 CORRECTIONS TO PREVIOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORTS No corrections to previous Radioactive Effluent Release Reports are submitted for this report period.7-2 SECTION 8 EFFLUENT FROM SYSTEMS CLASSIFIED AS INSIGNIFICANT EFFLUENT PATHWAYS 8-1 EFFLUENT FROM SYSTEMS CLASSIFIED AS INSIGNIFICANT EFFLUENT PATHWAYS Insignificant Effluent Pathways are: 1) evaporation from the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Condensate Storage Tanks (CST's); 2) evaporation from the common Refueling Water Storage Tank (RWST); 3) gaseous effluent from the Hydrogen Seal Oil, Main Turbine and RFPT lubrication oil mist eliminators which vent to the turbine building roofs.These pathways are not continuously monitored.
The CSTs and RWST are sampled monthly to determine the concentration of radionuclides present in these tanks. Tritium analysis on these samples is performed quarterly.
Airborne release to the environment from the tanks is estimated based on conservative estimates of the evaporation rates from each of the tanks using a modified method established within Chapter 7 of EPA AP-42. A conservative carry-over fraction of radionuclides from the water to the evaporated liquid is then assumed. Airborne release to the environment from the demisters assumes the average moisture (condensate) concentration of the lubrication oil as measured via sampling during 2014. The calculation also assumes immediate removal of 100% of the water by the oil mist eliminators as it passes through the turbines.The annual release of tritium, iodines and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days was calculated based on the conservative assumptions outlined above. The calculated releases are shown in Table 8-1. All nuclides, except for tritium, released from insignificant effluent pathways are negligible compared to the airborne release data shown in Tables 2-1 and 2-2. The maximum dose to the public from a release of 0.46 Ci of tritium is calculated to be 3.84E-3 mrem (child). This is a fraction of the maximum dose from airborne effluent reported in Section 4.8-2 0 TABLE 8-1 ANNUAL RELEASE FROM SYSTEMS CLASSIFIED AS INSIGNIFICANT EFFLUENT PATHWAYS U1-CST and U2-CST and Main Turbine/RFPT Main Turbine/RFPT Nuclide RWST Lube Oil Systems Lube Oil Systems Total (Ci) (Ci) (ci) (Ci)H-3 3.15E-02 2.24E-01 2.07E-01 4.63E-01 Mn-54 5.08E-09 3.28E-08 1.12E-08 4.91E-08 Co-60 2.45E-08 1.43E-07 2.82E-08 1.96E-07 Co-58 8.75E-09 5.18E-08 1.11E-08 7.16E-08 Zn-65 1.26E-09 7.39E-09 9.93E-10 9.64E-09 Sb-124 O.OOE+00 6.82E-10 O.OOE+00 6.82E-10 Xe-135 O0OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.53E-10 1.53E-10 Cs-137 O.OOE+00 2.97E-10 0.00E+oo 2.97E-10 8-3