Letter Sequence RAI |
---|
CAC:001794, (Approved, Closed) EPID:L-2023-DOT-0005, Cover Letter from Richard Boyle (DOT) Requesting the Review and Revalidation of the Model No. JRF-90Y-950K (Approved, Closed) |
Results
Other: ML23058A279, ML23058A281, ML23058A284, ML23058A286, ML23058A287, ML23059A252, ML23067A441, ML23109A009, ML23115A080, ML23115A082, ML23115A086, ML23115A320, ML23160A084, ML23160A087, ML23310A163
|
MONTHYEARML23115A0802019-08-16016 August 2019 U.S. Certificate of Competent Authority USA/0208/B(U)F-96, Revision 13 (Japanese Certificate J/61/B(U)F-96), Expired May 28.2022 Project stage: Other ML23058A2862022-07-29029 July 2022 Part 1-Response, Acceptance Review, 2/23/23, Document No. 1 Japanese Certificate of the Competent Authority No. J/2043/B(U)F, Model No. JRF-90Y-950K (English Version) Issued on May 23, 2022 Project stage: Other ML23006A1042023-01-0505 January 2023 Cover Letter from Richard Boyle (DOT) Requesting the Review and Revalidation of the Model No. JRF-90Y-950K Project stage: Request ML23160A0842023-01-0505 January 2023 Email Dated 1/5/23 from Rwboyle (DOT) to Arony (Edlow)-Incomplete Application, Information Request, Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority No. J/2043/B(U)F, Model No. JRF-90Y-950K Project stage: Other ML23046A0402023-02-0202 February 2023 Revised Affidavit Dated 2/3/23, Revalidation Request for the Japanese Certificate of the Competent Authority No. J/2043/B(U)F, Model No. JRF-90Y-950K Project stage: Request ML23115A0812023-02-15015 February 2023 Enclosure 5, Revision 0, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Statement of Proprietary Information, Revalidation Application for the Japanese Mode No. JRC-80Y-20T Package (J/2045/B(U)F) Project stage: Request ML23058A2842023-02-20020 February 2023 Part 1-Response Acceptance Review, 2-23-23, Document No. 5, Affidavit on the Proprietary Documents of the Application of the Model No. JRF-90Y-950K Project stage: Other ML23310A1632023-02-22022 February 2023 Czech Language and English Translation of the Certificate of the Competent Authority for the Model No. S?Koda MTR Triga Package, CZ/100/B(U)F-6, Revision 0 Project stage: Other ML23058A2812023-02-23023 February 2023 Part 1-Response Acceptance Review, 2-23-23, Document No. No. 3-1 (Non-proprietary), Summary of Change of SAR for JRF-90Y-950K Project stage: Other ML23058A2852023-02-23023 February 2023 Part 1 - Transmittal Letter Dated 2/23/23 from Russell Neely (Edlow International) to Rick Boyle (Dot), Responses of Request for Supplemental Information from NRC on Completeness of the Application for the Model No. JRF-90Y-950K (J/2043/B(U Project stage: Supplement ML23058A2872023-02-23023 February 2023 Part 1-Response, Acceptance Review, 2/23/23, Document No. No. 1-1 (Non-Proprietary), Japanese Certificate of the Competent Authority No. J/2043/B(U)F, Model No. JRF-90Y-950K (English Version) Issued on May 23, 2022 Project stage: Other ML23058A2792023-02-23023 February 2023 Part 1-Response, Acceptance Review, 2/23/23, Document No. 2-1 (Non-Proprietary) Safety Analysis Report, Application of Design Approval for the Model No. JRF-90Y-950K (J/2043/B(U)F) Project stage: Other ML23059A2542023-02-27027 February 2023 Part 2 - Transmittal Letter Dated 2/27/23 from Russell Neely (Edlow International) to Rick Boyle (Dot), Responses of Request for Supplemental Information, Completeness of the Application for the Model No. JRF-90Y-950K (J/2043/B(U)F) Project stage: Supplement ML23059A2522023-02-27027 February 2023 Part 2-Response Acceptance Review, 2-27-23, Updated Document No. 4-1 (Non-proprietary) Comparison Table of SAR for Type JRF-90Y-950K Project stage: Other ML23061A1862023-03-0202 March 2023 Part 3 - Transmittal Letter Dated 3/2/23 from Rick Boyle (DOT) to Norma Garcia Santos (Nrc), Responses to Request for Supplemental Information, Application for the Model No. JRF-90Y-950K (J/2043/B(U)F) Project stage: Supplement ML23115A0792023-03-0303 March 2023 Transmittal Letter from Edlow International Company to the U.S. DOT, Application for Validation of the Model No. JRC-80Y-20T Package (J/2045/B(U)F) Project stage: Request ML23067A4412023-03-16016 March 2023 Application for the Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority No. J/2043/B(U), Revision 2, Model No. JRF-90Y-950K - Accepted for Review - CAC No. 001794 and EPID No. L-2023-DOT-0000 Project stage: Other ML23115A0862023-04-0303 April 2023 Enclosure 2-1 - Safety Analysis Report for the Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority Model No. JRC-80Y-20T (J/2045/B(U)F) (English) Project stage: Other ML23115A0822023-04-0303 April 2023 Enclosure 4-1, Comparison Table of the 2019 Safety Evaluation Report (SAR) (J/61/B(U)F-96) and the 2023 SAR (J/2045/B(U)F) for the Model No. JRC-80Y-20T (Non-Proprietary) Project stage: Other ML23101A0352023-04-0303 April 2023 Transmittal Letter from R Boyle (DOT) to Dfm Director (Nrc), Revalidation Request for the Model No. JMS-87Y-18.5T (J/2044/B(U)F) Project stage: Request ML23160A0872023-04-11011 April 2023 Email Dated 4/11/23 from Rneely (Edlow) to Rboyle (DOT)-Confirmation of Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority No. J/2043/B(U)F, Model No. JRF-90Y-950K, as Public Records Project stage: Other ML23109A0092023-05-0101 May 2023 Application for the Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority No. J/2044/B(U)F, Revision 15, Model No.JMS-87Y-18.5T - Accepted for Review - Cost of Activity Code/Enterprise Project Identification Number (CAC No. 001794/EPID No. L-2023-DOT Project stage: Other ML23115A3202023-05-0101 May 2023 Application for the Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority No. J/2045/B(U)F, Revision 14, Model No. Jrc-80y-20t - Accepted for Review - Cost Activity Code/Enterprise Project Identification Number (CAC 001794/EPID L-2023-DOT-0006) Project stage: Other ML23136B1662023-05-10010 May 2023 Email from R. Boyle (DOT) to N. Garcia (NRC) Response to the Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation of Japanese Certificate of Approval J/2043/B(U)F for the Model No. JRF-90Y-950K Package, Docket 71-3036 Project stage: Request ML23136B1672023-05-11011 May 2023 Letter from Richard W. Boyle (DOT) to Norma Garcia Santos, Response to the Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation of Japanese Certificate of Approval J/2043/B(U)F for the Model No. JRF-90Y-950K Package, Docket 71-3036 Project stage: Request ML23257A0022023-05-30030 May 2023 Attachment-Email Dated 5-30-23 from Ngarcia Santos (NRC) to Rboyle (DOT) Staggered Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation Recommendation of the Model No. JMS-87Y-18.5T, Structural Evaluation Project stage: RAI ML23256A3472023-05-30030 May 2023 Attachment - Email Dated 5-30-23 from Ngarcia Santos (NRC) to Rboyle (DOT) Staggered Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation Recommendation of the Model No. JRC-80Y-20T, Structural Evaluation Project stage: RAI ML23256A3482023-05-30030 May 2023 Email Dated 5-30-23 from Ngarcia Santos (NRC) to Rboyle (DOT) Staggered Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation Recommendation of the Model No. JRC-80Y-20T, Structural Evaluation Project stage: RAI ML23257A0032023-05-30030 May 2023 Email Dated 5-30-23 from Ngarcia Santos (NRC) to Rboyle (DOT) Staggered Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation Recommendation of the Model No. JMS-87Y-18.5T, Structural Evaluation Project stage: RAI ML23256A3502023-06-0202 June 2023 Attachment - Email Dated 6-2-23 from Ngarcia Santos (NRC) to Rboyle (DOT) Staggered Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation Recommendation of the Model No. JRC-80Y-20T, Materials Evaluation and General Information Project stage: RAI ML23256A3492023-06-0202 June 2023 Email Dated 6-2-23 from Ngarcia Santos (NRC) to Rboyle (DOT) Staggered Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation Recommendation of the Model No. JRC-80Y-20T, Materials Evaluation and General Information Project stage: RAI ML23257A0052023-06-0202 June 2023 Attachment-Email Dated 6-2-23 from Ngarcia Santos (NRC) to Rboyle (DOT) Staggered Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation Recommendation of the Model No. JMS-87Y-18.5T, Materials Evaluation and General Information Project stage: RAI ML23257A0042023-06-0202 June 2023 Email Dated 6-2-23 from Ngarcia Santos (NRC) to Rboyle (DOT) Staggered Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation Recommendation of the Model No. JMS-87Y-18.5T, Materials Evaluation and General Information Project stage: RAI ML23159A2672023-06-13013 June 2023 Approval of the Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure of the Application for Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority No. J/2043/B(U), Model No. JRF-90Y-950K Package (Docket No. 71-3036) Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance ML23152A2042023-06-13013 June 2023 Safety Evaluation Report for the Revalidation of the Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority No. J/2043/B(U)-96 for the Model No. JRF-90Y-950K Project stage: Approval ML23158A2462023-06-14014 June 2023 Enclosure 1 (Non-Proprietary) - Request for Additional Information for the Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority No. J/2044/B(U)F, Model No. JMS-87Y-18.5T Package, Revalidation Request (Docket No. 71-3004) Project stage: RAI ML23158A2442023-06-14014 June 2023 Transmittal Letter - Request for Additional Information for Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority No. J/2044/B(U)F, Model No. JMS-87Y-18.5T Package, Revalidation Request (Docket No. 71-3004) Project stage: RAI ML23212B1012023-07-12012 July 2023 NRC 699 - 7/12/23, Conference Summary Call, NRC, DOT, Edlow, and DOE, Discussion of Responses to Requests for Additional Information for the Model Nos. JMS-87Y-18.5T and JRC-80Y-20T Revalidation Requests (Docket No. 71-3004 and 71-3035) Project stage: RAI ML23213A1322023-07-27027 July 2023 Email Dated 7-27-23 from Rneely (Edlow) to Ngarcia Santos (NRC) Subject: Proprietary Review of Teleconference Call Summary to Discuss RAI Responses for the Revalidation of the Model Nos. JMS-87Y-18.5T and JRC-80Y-20T Certificates Project stage: Meeting ML23212B0732023-07-31031 July 2023 Enclosure - 7/12/23, Conference Summary Call, NRC, DOT, Edlow, and DOE, Discussion of Responses to Requests for Additional Information for the Model Nos. JMS-87Y-18.5T and JRC-80Y-20T Revalidation Requests (Docket No. 71-3004 and 71-3035) Project stage: Response to RAI ML24023A0312023-09-14014 September 2023 Edlow International Co., Response to Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation Request of the Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority No. J/2044/B(U)F, Model No. JMS-87Y-18.ST Project stage: Response to RAI 2023-04-11
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Request for Additional Information (RAI)
MONTHYEARML23158A2462023-06-14014 June 2023 Enclosure 1 (Non-Proprietary) - Request for Additional Information for the Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority No. J/2044/B(U)F, Model No. JMS-87Y-18.5T Package, Revalidation Request (Docket No. 71-3004) ML23158A2442023-06-14014 June 2023 Transmittal Letter - Request for Additional Information for Japanese Certificate of Competent Authority No. J/2044/B(U)F, Model No. JMS-87Y-18.5T Package, Revalidation Request (Docket No. 71-3004) ML23257A0052023-06-0202 June 2023 Attachment-Email Dated 6-2-23 from Ngarcia Santos (NRC) to Rboyle (DOT) Staggered Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation Recommendation of the Model No. JMS-87Y-18.5T, Materials Evaluation and General Information ML23257A0022023-05-30030 May 2023 Attachment-Email Dated 5-30-23 from Ngarcia Santos (NRC) to Rboyle (DOT) Staggered Request for Additional Information for the Revalidation Recommendation of the Model No. JMS-87Y-18.5T, Structural Evaluation 2023-06-02
[Table view] |
Text
Request for Revalidation of Japanese Competent Authority Certificate of Approval No.
J/2044/B(U)F, Model No. JMS-87Y-18.5T Materials Review -
Request for Additional Information (RAI)
EPID: L-2023-DOT-0005 RAI-Ma-1:
Please describe any national or international codes, standards, and/or other methods, programs, or procedures that are implemented to ensure that package maintenance activities (including visual inspections, screening and evaluation of visual indications, and corrective actions such as component repairs and replacements) are adequate to manage the effects of aging in metallic package components that would see long-term use, such that the package components are capable of performing their requisite safety functions throughout the period of use.
Per IAEA SSG-26, Paragraph 613A.3, the package should be evaluated during the design phase in the demonstration of compliance with the Transport Regulations. Based on this evaluation, an inspection and maintenance programme should be developed. The programme should be structure so that the assumptions (e.g. thickness of containment wall, leaktightness, neutron absorber effectiveness) used in the demonstration of compliance of the package are confirmed to be valid through the lifetime of the packaging.
The staff requests that this description address the following criteria:
- 1. Inspection methods (e.g., bare metal visual exams and/or other types of nondestructive exams such as liquid penetrant exams or ultrasonic exams) for detection, characterization, and sizing of localized aging effects such as cracks, pits, and crevice corrosion.
- 2. Inspection equipment and personnel qualification requirements (e.g., lighting and visual acuity requirements for performing visual exams) to ensure reliable inspections that can adequately detect and characterize indications of localized aging effects prior to component failure or loss of safety function.
- 3. Acceptance criteria for aging effects such as early stage fatigue cracks and localized corrosion of stainless steel components, such as chloride induced stress corrosion cracking (SCC), pitting, and crevice corrosion. Examples of visual indications that may indicate potential localized corrosion of stainless steel components include the accumulation of atmospheric deposits such as salts, buildup of corrosion products, rust-colored stains or deposits, and surface discontinuities or flaws associated with pitting, crevice corrosion, and/or SCC.
- 4. Describe any surface cleaning requirements that are implemented to ensure that bare metal visual inspections of component surfaces are capable of detecting surface flaws, and for ensuring adequate removal of atmospheric deposits such as salts or other chemical compounds that may contribute to localized corrosion of stainless steel components.
- 5. Describe any flaw evaluation methods (such as flaw sizing and flaw analysis methods) and associated flaw acceptance criteria that may be used to determine whether components containing flaws are acceptable for continued service.
This information is requested in order to verify compliance with requirements of the 2018 Edition of IAEA SSR-6, Paragraphs 503(e), 613A, and 809(f).
RAI-Ma-2:
Per IAEA SSG-26, Paragraph 613A.1, The designer of a package should evaluate the potential degradation phenomena over time, such as corrosion, abrasion, fatigue, crack propagation, changes of material compositions or mechanical properties due to thermal loadings or radiation, generation of decomposition gases and the impact of these phenomena on performance of safety functions. As the staff was not able to locate a discussion on abrasion being evaluated as an aging mechanism, the staff requests the applicant to provide an evaluation of abrasion as an aging mechanism.
This information is requested in order to verify compliance with requirements of the 2018 Edition of IAEA SSR-6, Paragraph 613A.
RAI-Ma-3:
Per IAEA SSG-26, Paragraph 613A.5, For designs of Type B(U), B(M) and Type C packages these programmes are required to be included in the application for approval of packages for shipment after storage (see paras 809(f) and (k) of the Transport Regulations). The results of the ageing management programme and the gap analysis programme should be taken into account when preparing an inspection plan prior to transport. The staff was not able to locate an aging management program or gap analysis program as required by IAEA SSR-6, Paragraphs 809(f) and (k). The staff requests the applicant to provide the aging management program (per the structure and procedure in IAEA SSG-26, Paragraph 613A.3) and gap analysis program.
This information is requested in order to verify compliance with requirements of the 2018 Edition of IAEA SSR-6, Paragraphs 809(f) and (k).
RAI-Ma-4: The staff requests the applicant to address two inconsistencies identified between the maximum temperatures identified for the wood impact limiter (Fir-Plywood) in SAR Section B.4.2 and SAR Section F.2, and provide the basis for the evaluation of the wood in the impact limiter in the analyzed range of temperatures. In SAR Section F.2, the applicant states that the maximum temperature identified at the surface of the package is 111°C during transportation.
However, in SAR Section B.4.2, Table (II)-B.15 and B.16, the highest temperature listed is 82°C. Secondly, the applicant states that based on the results of analysis, the temperature inside the shock absorber during actual transportation is estimated to be below about 40°C. The applicant later states that the average temperature data of the shock absorber of another package with a track record of transportation of spent fuel was evaluated and shown to be around 40°C to 70°C, which contradicts the previous temperature estimate.
This information is requested in order to verify compliance with requirements of the 2018 Edition of IAEA SSR-6, Paragraphs 613A, 616, and 639.
RAI-Ma-5: In SAR Section F.2, the applicant described the corrosion that could affect the shock absorber (Wood - Fir-Plywood). The staff requests the applicant to clarify how they are addressing potential water absorption by the shock absorber. In SAR Table III-B.1, a visual inspection is described but does not include any mention of inspection of the welds or areas adjacent to the welds, nor is any specific acceptance criteria described.
This information is requested in order to verify compliance with requirements of the 2018 Edition of IAEA SSR-6, Paragraph 613A.
RAI-Ma-6: In SAR Section F.2, the applicant describes heat related aging mechanisms that can affect the Boron Carbide-Aluminum Alloy, stating that thermal analysis indicated a substantial temperature difference between the maximum temperature expected during transport and the melting temperature of the Boron Carbide-Aluminum Alloy. The A1100-H14 cladding material, however, has a much lower melting temperature and the staff requests that the applicant provide a comparison between the maximum temperature expected during transport to the qualified temperature limit for the A1100-H14 cladding material.
This information is requested in order to verify compliance with requirements of the 2018 Edition of IAEA SSR-6, Paragraph 613A.
General RAI Replace all references to the IAEA transport safety regulations in the JMS SAR to appropriately reflect Rev. 1 of SSR-6, (2018).
In the JMS SAR, Rev. 1, on page (II)-A-410 (for example), reference (29) is listed as IAEA/Radio active material safety transportation regulations (1985 transaction) safety series No. 6; however, since the SAR has been revised to meet the requirements of SSR-6, Rev. 1 (2018), the correct reference should be to SSR-6, Rev. 1 (2018).
This information is needed to establish alignment with the requirements in SSR-6, Rev. 1 (2018 Edition) Paragraph 102.