ML22292A127

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
5 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 14, Figures
ML22292A127
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/05/2022
From:
Constellation Energy Generation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML22292A107 List: ... further results
References
NMP2L2821
Download: ML22292A127 (12)


Text

START-UP INTERNAL TECHNICAL REVIEW TEST GROUP MANAGER REVIEW AND APPROVAL (1)

REVIEW CYCLE (2)

JOINT TEST GROUP APPROVAL

1. FINAL STEP FOR SELECTED PRELIMINARY TESTS.
2. JTG MEMBERS, QUALITY ASSURANCE AND OTHERS AS DESIGNATED BY THE TEST GROUP MANAGER.

FIGURE 14.2-1 REVIEW CYCLE FOR SELECTED PRELIMINARY ANO ALL PREOPERATIONALTESTPROCEDURES

. / NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT -UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT AMENDMENT 24 FEBRUARY 1986

I-a: zw w

=0 0

a:: ....:

0.. w LL w

I/)

0..

I 0

a: > <

0 0 z w

c w  ::c llJ

~ u ..J c(

a: ii:

LL I-0 m w I-EFFICIENCY 90 I

80 I

70 I

60 240 I I 50 200 I I 40 160 I I 40 I-600 30 120 TYPICAL NPSHR ~

_"\---

I 20 w~

I I I 400 20 80 BHP AT 1.0 S.G.'.. - - - - - ----*~----, -;r;,a:

I I I

' z 0 a..

200 10 40 I I I a 0 0 0 2000 CAPACITY - U.S. GALLONS PER MINUTE 4000 6000 8000 10,000 12,000 FIGURE 14.2-lb-1 SERVICE WATER PUMP CHARACTERISTIC CURVE I

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT USAR REVfSION 0 APRIL 1989

( *,,

i TECHNICAL REVIEW (LEAD STD&A AND POWER ASCENSION MANAGER) i STAFF REVIEW (IN ACCORDANCE WITH AP'S)

.f*****

SORC REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE SRAB REVIEW*

APPROVAL BY GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT

  • ONLY AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT FIGURE 14.2-2 REVIEW CYCLE FOR INITIAL STARTUP TEST PROCEDURES NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT -UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT AMENDMENT 28 MAY 1987

l TEST ENGINEER REVIEW TEST GROUP MANAGER/LEAD ENGINEER (1) l JOINT TEST GROUP REVIEW AND APPROVAL l

SORC REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE BY THE STATION SUPERINTENDENT

1. FINAL STEP FOR PRELIMINARY TEST RESULTS EXCEPT AS NOTED IN 14.2.5.1 FIGURE 14.2-3 PRELIMINARY AND PREOPERATIONAL TEST RESULTS REVIEW NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT -UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT AMENDMENT 24 FEBRUARY 1986

TECHNICAL REVIEW (GE LEAD STD&A, S.O.M., TECHNICAL SUPT.,

i AND ACCEPTANCE AND POWER ASCENSION MANAGER)

STATION SUPERINTENDENT i

REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE QUALITY ASSURANCE i

REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE SORC REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE i*****+SRAB*

GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL

  • ONLY AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT FIGURE 14.2-4 INITIAL STARTUP TEST RESULTS REVIEW I I NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT -UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT AMENDMENT 28 MAY 1987

110 no 100 10 10 JO 10 to

  • o
io JO 10 0

0 1G JO lO IQ "llClln CDllS fl.OW CONDmON (TC)

RECIRC PUMPS OPERATING ON LOW FREQUENCY POWER SUPPLY 2 BETWEEN 50'!& ANO 75'16 CONTROL ROD LINES, AT OR BELOW THE ANALYTICAL LOWER LIMIT OF MASTER FLOW CONTROL MOOE 3 FROM 50% TO 75'16 CONTROL ROD LINES AND CORE FLOW BETWEEN 80% ANO MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 5 lalWJN 8 TO *SX a:: TH£ llAlEll ROD LIHE 8ETllUN NATURAi. ClRClll.llTIDN Alt!>&: ABDVC.

"DE NW.YTICM.. LOliER LlllT CF MllST£R ~ Fl.DV t1lN1RCL Al.SO FROH TH: lOiir.(

ADO UNE TO Tt£ ee% llOO LIN£ llT HlllUML ClRCU.llTTOtf.

6 WITHIN 0 TO *6'16 OF RA TED THERMAL POWER, ANO WITHIN Mii OF RATEO CORE FLOW RATE FIGURE 14.2-5 TEST CONDITION REGION DEFINITION NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT USAR REVISION 0 APRIL 1989

THIS FIGURE HAS BEEN DELETED FIGURE 14.2-6 i

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT -UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT AMENDMENT 22 NOVEMBER 1985

SWEC NMP:Z STATION PROJECT PROJECT SUPERINTENDENT DIRECTOR MANAGER I

SUPERVISOR STARTUP OF MANAGER OPERATIONS I

I ..---*------.

GE SWEC TEST SITE PROJECT OPERATIONS GROUP STAFF OPERATIONS ADVISORY MANAGERS MANAGER ENGINEER I I TEST ENGINEERS GE LEAD ENGINEER GE STARTUP l TEST AND OPERATIONS DESIGN AND STAFF SUPERINTENDENT ANALYSIS I I GESTARTUPl GE TEST DESIGN SHIFT AND ANALYSIS SUPERINTENDENTS ENGINEERS FIGURE 14.2-7 UNIT 2 STARTUP ORGANIZATION NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT AMENDMENT 16 DECEMBER 1984

JOO

]

...c...< 200

~

UNSAFE 100 SAFE UPTO l.IMITEO POWER 0

0 25 50 7r; 100 RATED POWER 1%1 100

~

~

0 z

c iii

"':.J Q so u ':t RATED POWER 1%1 FIGURE 14.2-21 ~-1 RCIC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA CURVES FOR CAPACITY AND ACTUATION TIME NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT -UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT AMENDMENTS JANUARY 1984

0.45 -------..,...----.----"!"""------...,..----.

0.4 1---------+-------ti,--+--------+-----1 AREA OF AREA OF ACCEPTABLE RESPONSE UNACCEPTABLE RESPONSE 6UJ

~ 0.3 w

E j::

w z

(/)

0 n.

en w

a:

0.2 0 0......------~--------------------------------

0.1 0.2 0.3 DELAY TIME (SEC)

FIGURE 14.2-233-1 TRADEOFF CURVE FOR STEP SIZES 0 .2P. TO 0 . 5~

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT- UNIT 2 UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT USAR REVISION 0 APRIL 1989

( ...

0.45 -------,....--~.----ir-------~---..,

0.4 1-------+-----~---ir----------t----t AREA OF AREA OF ACCEPTABLE RESPONSE UNACCEPTABLE RESPONSE 6IJJ

~ 0.3 w

~

j::

w en z

0 0..

(/)

UJ cc 0.2 0 L..----------------------__...____.._________ ~

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 DELAY TIME (SEC)

FIGURE 14.2-234-1 TRADEOFF CURVE FOR STEP SIZES 0.2% TO 0.3 %

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT AMENDMENTS JANUARY 1984

TO BE PROVIDED IN GE TEST INSTRUCTIONS FIGURE 14.2-239-1 TWO-PUMP TRIP COASTDOWN CURVES

,I NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT AMENDMENTS JANUARY 1984