ML20237G059
Text
'
' g.
'./
~
,,.t g, p -
' g'p"' < g' b% 't
,3 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WASHINGTON, o.C. 20242 SEP 211967 Mr. Harold L. Price Director of Regulation U. S. Atomic Energy Commission 4915 St. Elmo Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20545
Dear Mr. Price:
Transmitted herewith in response to the requebt of Mr. Edson G. Case dated February 6,1%7, is a review of the geologic and hydrologic aspects of the license application of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant Site.
This review prepared by Henry W. Coulter and Eric L. Meyer of the Geological Survey has been discussed with members of your staff and i
ve have no objections to your making it a part of the public record.
Sincerely yours,
/
i Actin 8 Director Enclosures s
c I
?
.~..
s 3159 Dfff5070729 l/
CONNDR 67-gA A 7i' PDR
i Diablo~ Canyon Site AEC Docket 50-275 J
Hydrology The site is on the shore of the Pacific Ocean in San Luis Obispo County, near the mouth of Diablo Canyon Creek. The reactor'is to be a
located on a terrace on the left bank of the Creek at a grade altitude j
of 85 feet above mean sea level. Cooling water is to be obtained from I
I an intake at.the ocean south of the reactor and discharged about 1,200 feet north of the intake. A spit of land extends about.1,000 feet into the ocean between the intake and discharge points.
The reactor location would not be affected by floods of Diablo Canyon Creek, the only devebped draina6e nearby. The switchyard,-
I however, is shown as occupying a part of the canyon where it could be affected by flooding.
There are no reports of Ground water developments in the vicinity of the site. It does not appear that the reactor would affect fresh-i water resources of the area.
Geology The analysis of the geology of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant Site presented in A.E.C. Docket No. 50-275 and supplements was reviewed and compared with the available literature, and the exploratory trenches at the site were examined on August 14--15, 1966. The analysis appears j
to be carefully derived and to present an adequate appraisal of those aspects of the geology which would be pertinent to an engineering evaluation of the site.
345D 5
j l
l l
Minor foundation and slope stability problems which may require small scele design modifications can be anticipated dvring the excava-i r
tion phase of construct 1,on.
Such modifications should be within the limits of standard engineering practice.
i There are no identifiable geolcgic structures whidh could be expected to localize earthquakes in the.immediate vic!..11ty of the site.
Henry W. Coulter Eric L. Meyer l
\\
l i
l l
l l
l l
l l
[
2
. _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _