ML20237F986

Advises That Author Reviewed Rept to AEC Dtd Dec 1967 & Compared Copy W/Draft Prepared by Author,Per Rs Boyd 680116 Request.Original Draft Indicates Suppl Should Be Added But Listed Statement May Not Be Important

ML20237F986
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	01/22/1968
From:	Newmark N NATHAN M. NEWMARK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
To:	Morris P US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20236J368	List: IA-87-214, Discusses ACRS 92nd Meeting on 671207-09.ACRS Completed Review of PG&E Application for Const of Nuclear Unit at Diablo Canyon Site.Facility Can Be Constructed W/O Risk to Public Health & Safety ML20236J366 ML20236J587 ML20236J622 ML20236J671 ML20236J804 ML20236J841 ML20236J985 ML20236K008 ML20236K057 ML20236K327 ML20236K351 ML20236K384 ML20236K422 ML20236K563 ML20236L228 ML20236L279 ML20236L316 ML20236L364 ML20236L420 ML20236L474 ML20236L565 ML20236L647 ML20236L689 ML20236L706 ML20236L724 ML20236L756 ML20236L787 ML20236L806 ML20236L866 ML20236L901 ML20236L922 ML20236L931 ML20236L986 ML20236M007 ML20236M024 ML20236M065 ML20236M681 ML20236M725 ML20236M744 ML20236M771 ML20236M777 ML20236N015 ML20236N032 ML20236N085 ML20236N115 ML20236N139 ML20236N193 ML20236N208 ML20236N255 ... further results
References
FOIA-87-214 NUDOCS 8708130263
Download: ML20237F986 (1)

Text

1 j

NATHAN M.

NEWMARK 9

CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES 1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING URBANA. ILLINOIS 618o1 22 January 1968 I

i 1

Dr. Peter A. Morris, Director Division of Reactor Licensing U. S. Atomic Energy Commission

]

Washington, D.C.

20545 q

l Re:

Diablo Canyon Report - Docket No. 50-275

]

l Dea r Dr. Morris :

i k

In accordance with the request f rom Roger S. Boyd, dated 16 January 1968, we have reviewed the report to the AEC Regulatory Staff dated December 1967, prepared by Dr. Hall and myself, and compared the i

copy with the draft prepared by us.

One minor point is called to your l

attention. At the bottom of the first paragraph on page 7, the original draf t and notes (f rom the end of the first complete paragraph on page 8 i

of the original draf t) indicates that a sentence should be added as follows:

]

j 1

"On this basis, we concur in the design approach adopted."

However, this added statement may not be important, and I believe that the typed copy of the report reflects our views and is in accord with our draft. Therefore I am signing it on page 11 and returning a copy to you.

I am also returning the amended draf t copy, which is marked for Troy Conne r.

i Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely you rs, D '8[d/. w w.s/ (

N. M. Newmark bj w cc:

W. J. Hall Enclosure 9708130263 070729 PDR FOIA

(

ppa CONNORB7-214 241