ML20236V358
| ML20236V358 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 11/23/1987 |
| From: | HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236V341 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8712040251 | |
| Download: ML20236V358 (152) | |
Text
1 Addendum 2 CantrefRopm= Design =Revlew-i Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report i
i gh2ona!! BI!!jha The SouthTexas Project HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY
Addendum 2 ContiCIEcom OCSign Review Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report The SouthTexas Project HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY
i t
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gggggy ggyjgy
. E POWER CO.
HED RESOLUTION REPORT j
REVISION LOG Revision Pages.
No.
Date Description Affected 0
4/15/85 Initial Issue 1
8/12/85
. General Revision 1, vil, 2-4, 2-5, A4'2, A-5, A-6, A-8, A-9, A-10, 4
A-11, A-12, B-3, B-4, B-5, B-8, B-9, B-18, B-19,B-25, B-29, D-5, D-6 Addendum 12/22/86 Initial Issue No.1 Addendum 11/23/87 Complete Revision of No.2 Addendum No.1 i
11/23/87 8654c/0332c
l 1
houston CONTROL ROOM
. UGHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW HED RESOLUTION REPORT
_. _._... POWE R CO.
TABLE OF CONTENTS l
1 Section Title Page l
REVISION LOG i
TABLE OF CONTENTS 11 LIST OF TABLES 11 LIST OF FIGURES 111 1
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS iv
]
SUMMARY
vi l
PREFACE vill '
I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1-1
{
l.1
GENERAL COMMENT
S 1-1 j
1.2 OBJECTIVE l-1 1.3 METHOD OF REPORTING RESOLUTIONS 1-1 2.0 LISTING OF HED RESOLUTIONS 2-1 CATEGORY A A-1 CATEGORY B B-1 CATEGORY C C -I CATEGORY D D-1 l
LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 2-1 HED'S IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAll HED 2-6 RESOLUTION REPORT 2-2 HED'S IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED 2-15 RESOLUTION REPORT il 11/23/87 8654c/0332c i
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM' LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW -
1
_...._ POWE R CO.
j HED RESOLUTION REPORT ADDENDUM 2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title P-1 STP CRDR MAJOR REPORTS l'I I
111 11/23/87 8654c/0332c u-----______________.__
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l
UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW HED RESOLUTION REPORT
_E POWER CO.
ADDENDUM 2 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
]
)
AFW Auxiliary Feedwater ATWS Anticipated Transient Without Scram f
BAT Boric Acid Tank CCW Component Cooling Water CR Control Room CRDR Control Room Design Review CRS Control Room Survey l
)
CRT Cathode Ray Tube
]
CSF Critical Safety Function CVI Containment Ventilation Isolation dB(A)
Decibel
)
DC Direct Current EAB Electrical Auxiliary Building l
l ECW Essential Cooling Water j
EOP Emergency Operating Procedure (s) i l
ERFDADS Emergency Response Facilities Data Acquisition and Display System (SPDS is a portion of ERFDADS)
ESF Engineered Safety Features ESFAS Engineered Safety Features Actuation System FW Feedwater GPM Gallons per Minute HED Human Engineering Discrepancy HL&P Houston Lighting & Power Company HVAC Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning kV Kilovolt LOOP Loss of Offsite Power iv 11/23/87 8654c/0332c
.a
i
)
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM i
LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
^
OWER CO.
HED RESOLUTION REPORT l
i ADDENDUM 2 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 1
l MCC Motor Control Center MCO Main Construction Office MG Motor Generator NIS Nuclear Instrumentation System NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission NSF Normal Safety Function i
OER Operating Experience Review l
P&ID Piping and Instrumentation Diagram
(
PORY Power-Operated Relief Valve Proteus Plant computer QDPS Qualified Display Processing System RCB Reactor Containment Building RCS Reactor Coolant System RHR Residual Heat Removal RWST Refueling Water Storage Tank SFTA System Function and Task Analysis SG Steam Generator SOFP Steam Generator Feed Pump SI Safety injection SIS Safety injection System SPDS Safety Parameter Display System STP South Texas Project V
Volt V&V Verification and Validation l
VCT Volume Control Tank l
v 11/23/87 8654c/0332c
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM.
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW '
_._ _., POWE R CO.
HED RESOLUTION REPORT ADDENDUM 2
SUMMARY
This addendum to the HED Resolution Report summarizes the results of the resolution of Category A, B, C and D Human Engineering Discrepancies (HEDs) as approved by the '
Project and Management Review Teams in response to human engineering observations generated as a result of the following activities:
a.
The Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) validation.
b.
The disposition of HEDs which were not complete at the time of the initial HED Resolution Report.
l c.
The disposition of Category E HEDs which have been evaluated.
i I
d.
Miscellaneous CRDR human factors work.
e.
Dispositions where it was determined that revision, clarification or additional information was necessary.
i The EOP validation was performed at the South Texas Project simulator, located in the ;
training facility, during May 1986. This effort and the results are described in the EOP J
Validation Report.
)
Disposition of HEDs not complete at the time of the initial HED Resolution Report (dated l
. April 15,1985, as revised August 12, 1985) and disposition of the majority of Category E HEDs were performed in December 1986. Various other remaining CRDR tasks, as shown in the E.cecutive Summary and its addenda, were also completed during December 1986.
vi 11/23/87 8654c/0332c
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM lGHTING g gggg y gg yyy y
_.._ E POWER CD.
1 Nearly all of the remainhg Category E HEDs were evaluated and dispositioned in January 1987 and June 1987. Various other remaining CRDR tasks, as shown in the Executive Summary addenda, have also been completed during 1987.
This addendum serves as a separate document summarizing the disposition of HEDs remaining open at the time of the initial HED Resolution Report and those IIEDs j
developed after that report. Addendum 2 supersedes Addendum I in its entirety.
l l
l l
s l
l 4
vii 11/23/87 l
8654c/0332c
{
l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
\\
j POWER CD.
HED RESOLUTION REPORT ADDENDUM 2 PREFACE The control room design review (CRDR) of the South Texas ~ Project (STP). Electric Generating Station was started in September 1982. This review was performed by Torrey Pines Technology for Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P) with Bechtel Energy Corporation (Bechtel) acting as agent.
The program plan was presented to the NRC at the STP mock-up in October 1982. The l
basic review work for operator experience review, system function and task analysis and j
control room survey was completed in October 1982. In November 1982 the management team put a hold on CRDR activities, and authorized a design study to correct mounting j
l evolutionary engineering changes and discrepancies with the NUREG-0700 guidelines.
I In November 1982, a decision was made by HL&P to completely relayout six panels and upgrade the four remaining main control room panels based on the design study. This l
redesign effort was required to accomodate design changes resulting from plant design evolution and Regulatory Guide 1.97 requirements and to correct discrepancies with NUREG-0700. In December 1982 the management team selected one of five alternatives l
studied for design implementation.
The mock-up was revised considering the 441 identified HEDs and evolutionary l
engineering changes. As the Bechtel layout engineers advanced the layouts of the 10 panels, Torrey Pines Technology engineers reviewed the rework for correction of known discrepancies and compliance with good human factors principles. The redesign effort on the main control panels was completed in April 1983. The NRC performed an in-progress l
audit in May 1983, after which the panel vendor was provided with firm layout drawings.
l l
l l
l l
l Vill l
11/23/87 l
8654c/0332c l
j
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gggggy ggyjgy POWE R CO.
The NRC audit comments required the addition of several special studies to those already in progress, e.g., demarcation and hierarchleal labeling. The most significant addition was the evaluation of specified parameters which resulted in a net reduction of 51 panel-i m eters. The extensive relayout required a repeat of the System Function and Task Analysis with verification and walk-through/ talk-through validation. Likewise a specially structured control room review and human factors review of the corrective measures for all Category "A" and representative Category "B" discrepancies were performed. The demarcation and hierarchical labeling studies resulted in continued upgrading of the mock-up. The completion of the panel relayout allowed the design of the annunciator system consistent with the relocations.of many systems and subsystems, and a reduction of active windows from 1055 to 642.
Following the completion of these major efforts, HL&P has continued the CRDR program, including resolution of human engineering deficiencies identified, using Bechtel and Torrey Pines Technology as required.
The documentation for this program was necessarily extensive in view of its design development nature. Documentation describing the work performed during the CRDR is summarized belor and in Figure P-1:
1.
Program Plan - Defines the plan for performing the CRDR.
2.
Criteria Report - Provides the detailed guidelines and basis for the CRDR and describes the interface between the control room and plant systems. This report also includes review procedures, plant conventions and Human Factors j
data developed during the CRDR that will facilitate future control room modifications.
1 i
I l
)
lx 11/23/87 l
8654c/0332e c_________________________________________________________________
l i
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l
i UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.... _._M POWE R CD.
i 3.
Operating Experience Review (OER) Report - Describes the operailons personnel review process, results, conclusions and recommendations of this task defined in the Program Plan.
4.
System Function and Task Analysis (SFTA) Report - Describes the methodology,
]
results, conclusions and recommendations for this SFTA effort defined in the 1
Program Plan.
I 5.
Control Room Survey (CRS) Report - Describes the review process, results, conclusions and recommendations of this task defined in the Program Plan.
This report also includes the final results and dispositions for the human factors
)
observations obtained from the OER and the SFTA.
.1 1
6.
Annunciator Report - Describes the review process, results, conclusions and 1
recommendations of the annunciator review task defined in the Program Plan, l
and the annunciator study guide.
7.
Special Studies Report - Describes details of miscellaneous studies performed I
l as part of the CRDR. This includes the anthropometric study, the hierarchical labeling study, ths demarcation study, evaluation of specified parameters and many minor studies to resolve NRC audit comments.
8.
Implementation Plan Report - Summarizes the control panel design changes resulting from the implementation of Reg. Guide 1.97 requirements, engineering design requirements and preliminary observations of the CRDR design review team. It describes the reasons for major changes to the control panel layouts.
x 11/23/87 8654c/0332c
. __ __ _ _d
,I 4
i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM i
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
_..__._ POWE R CO.
i 9.
SFTA Validation Report - Summarizes the second review required because of l
the extensive revisions made to the control panel layouts and also includes walk-through/ talk-through exercises performed in the mock-up area.
r
- 10. OER Validation Report - Summarizes the review made by operators to determine if the redesigned panels corrected reported operator concerns and evaluate if any new problems were created as a result of the corrective measures taken.
l I
- 11. CRS Validation Report - Summarizes the review made to determine if the Category A and representative samples of the Category B HEDs were satisfactorily corrected and if any new problems were created.
1 Summarizes the CRDR
- resuiis, conclusions,
- 12. Executive Summary recommendations and schedules for remaining work. Technical details are in the Operating Experience Review Report, the System Function and Ta#
l Analysis Report, the Annunciator Report, the Control Room Survey Report, the Special Studies Report, the Implementation Plan Report and various validation reports.
- 13. Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report - Summarizes all Category A, B, C and D HED resolutions.
j
- 14. Executive Summary Addenda - Summarize the results and remaining work schedules of the CRDR program following the submittal of the Executive Summary Report. Addendum I showed progress as of April 15, 1985.
l Addendum 2 showed progress as of December 22, 1986. Addendum 3 shows l
progress as of November 23,1987.
1 xi 11/23/87 8654c/0332c L-
)
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gggggy ggyjgy POWER CD.
- 15. Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) Validation Report - Summarizes the validation process used for the Emergency Operating Procedures and the results as they involve the control panels. This validation was conducted on the STP simulator during May 1986 using the draft EOPs.
- 16. Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report Addenda - Summarize all Category A, B, C and D HED resolutions for HEDs identified after January 1, 1986. Addendum I summarized the HED resolutions as of December 22, 1986.
i Addendum 2 summarizes the HED resolutions as of November 23,1987 and l
supersedes Addendum I in its entirety.
l l
l l
l l
i xii i
l1/23/87 8654c/0332c l
_j
zEnE O?jo&
OOR e@eE dea 2gg5ME l
9ouM v59 8-NALP Nr Z2 5 M
A R
G ORP f
\\
\\
- x. f N
\\s x'
s.'
lg NS OI M
"5Q, IS A
E TY Om zE4@-
I C
CL R
NV NA RY S
W E
E E
E UN LV II T
C R
ES TS TA S
E ST Y &
S
(
[
s s
x
%s w
~
s
'-s
.d g I
11 E
N GO Y
C R
N NS INI T.
A N
T E
OI TA O
ON y8 gem
- M O
I IS AD P
E I
R TYN N
RI VY MA T
I E
T 'A sm m dg IR UD A
CLO
,O EL m
UD I
I LN UM EE N
E UNA mn mQ2 Ems gol OE A
C E
FAO O
YS EM VD S D ID M
MKl CE l
XU E
l T
E D
NR o
P TA
- M L
A EU A
L D
M STV V
GD O
E
=
E I
E S&
X Y
RE S
H EC E
E P
MO R
N
[(
(
O ER P
h8 3
T MC m
3 g
/
jg L
6
1 l
J l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
)
i LIGHTING gggygy ggyjgy
_ _ __ E POWER CO.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
l 1.1
GENERAL COMMENT
S The Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report was prepared to provide in one document a summary of the HEDs and their resolutions, as approved by the Project and
.I Management Review Teams involved in the CRDR of the South Texas Project. This l
1 addendum addresses the HEDs not complete at the time of the initial HED Resolution Report and those develop 2d as a result of activities since that time. This addendum is prepared in a manner to be consistent with the initial HED Resolution Report.
i 1.2 OBJECTIVE 1
The purpose of this report addendum is to provide a structured reporting method for summarizing the resolutions of HEDs not completely resolved in the initial HED Resolution Report and HEDs developed in the continuing program to apply human factors principles to the design of the control room.
1.3 METHOD OF REPORTING RESOLUTIONS The Category A, B, C and D HEDs and resolutions addressed by this addendum are shown in Section 2.
l The schedules for completion of ongoing or remaining CRDR activities are provided in the Executive Summary Report Addenda, Section 5.0, Schedule.
i l
l l
l l
l l-1 11/23/87 8654c/0332c e_-____________________-_
--_-_A
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
\\
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
_... POWE R CD, 2.0 LISTING OF HED RESOLUTIONS The HED resolution sheets are organized by category (A, B, C and D) and each category is subdivided according to the NUREG-0700 Section 6 topics as follows:
l Workspace Communications j
Controls Visual Displays
)
Labels and location Aids Computers Panel layout Control / Display Integration Renumbering of some HEDs has occurred since the HED Resolution Report Addendum 1 and the EOP Validation Report. This renumbering was done to facilitate use of a single
)
number (i.e., the HED nutaber) instead of multiple sheet numbers to reference a single l
1 finding.
l For ease in locating a particular HED, Tables 2-1 and 2-2 have been provided, listing respectively the HEDs identified since the initial HED Resolution Report and the IIEDs l
identified in the initial HED Resolution Report for which additional information is provided herein.
Disposition notes are provided when several HEDs can be more effectively addressed in one ircation, and are listed for the following topics:
(
Computers 2-1 11/23/87 8654c/0332c j
p houston CONTROL ROOM lGHTING DESIGN REVIEW Oo28 POWER CO.
DISPOSITION NOTES Computers '
HF AREA HED CATEGORY 1
NOTE NO.
DISPOSITION l
CPT-1 The Qualified Display Processing System (QDPS) is a microprocessor-based system designed to perform several safety-related functions, as follows:
'I 1.
Data acquisition, processing and qualified display for post-accident monitoring.
2.
Data acquisition, display and analog' control for safe-shutdown to address separation / isolation concerns for a postulated control i
room / relay room fire.
3.
Data acquisition and digital processing of steam generator narrow j
range water level signals and primary coolant system hot leg temperature signals for transmission to the protection system and for display.
l l
4.
Safety grade control (and position indication, as required) of several safety related valves.
Design changes and resolutions to human engineering observations have been Identified which involve modification.( to the QDPS. Because the QDPS is microprocessor-based, these modifica:lans involve software changes; these software changes will require completion of a comprehensive verification and validation (V&V) effort.
The extent of changes required and the consequent extent of V&V effort have lengthened the schedule for implementation of these changes beyond 2-2 11/23/87 8654c/0332c L____________________________________
l I
l i
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
\\
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW InoAE POWER CD.
DISPOSITION NOTES I
HF AREA Comouters HED CATEGORY N/A I
NOTE NO.
DISPOSITION l
that originally anticipated. Resolutions for most of the following HEDs j
have been included in the scope of a modification package being developed by Westinghouse. The schedule is discussed in the Executive Summary Addenda, Section 5.0.
Discussions of each HED resolution are provided I
below.
HED-1022 The QDPS displays will be revised to consistently refer to steam line (Cat. C) pressure as STM PRESS, to use the correct abbreviation for estimated, and j
to delete "ce" from the cubicle cooler representation on the display.
l l
HED-1024 he QDPS displays are being revised to provide a more accurate indication (Cat.C) at low flow rates. When the flow signal f alls below a preset low limit, the display will read "***". 'Ihe QDPS display modifications required are being performed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS modifications.
Information has been issued to the Operations and Training Departments identifying the flow indication problem and measures that should be taken when QDPS flow indication is toward the low end of the range. This information has been included in the operator requalification program.
HED-1025
'Ihe QDPS software controlling valve position indicatinglights (Cat.C) on the Operator Interface Modules is being revised to make the "ooints adjustable. Initial setpoints of 5% and 95% will be used. The QDPb u play modifications required are being performed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS modifications. Information has been issued to the Operations and Training Departments identifying the valve position indicating light problem and interim instructions for accurately determining valve position. This information has been included in the operator requalification program.
2-3 11/23/87 8654c/0332c j
i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW I*oltE POWER CO.
DISPOSITION NOTES Computers A
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NOTE NO.
DISPOSITION HED-1026
'Ihe QDPS displays are being revised to clearly indicate which (Cat.B)
NE channel (1, II, III, IV) is being shown. Additionally, the bar graph display of power range neutron flux is being revised to show the corresponding RCS loop. The QDPS display modifications required are being performed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS modifications. Information has been issued to the Operations and Training Departments identifying the NIS display problems, so that operators are aware of what the displays are actually showing. This information has been included in the operator requalification program.
HED-1027 The QDPS displays are being revised to correct the inconsistencies (Cat. C) in nomenclature and labeling noted (missing arrowhead, missing units). The QDPS software is being revised as required to permit adjustment within the needed range for operator action points. The QDPS display modifications required are being performed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS modifications. Two other inconsistencies (incorrect PORV label, incorrect abbreviation) will be corrected at a later date.
HED-1041 QDPS displays of tank levels which are Tech Spec parameters will (Cat.B) be revised to display the levels in gallons, rather than percent, when the Tech Spec requirement is in gallons. This change will allow direct comparison of the Tech Spec requirement and the actual tank level.
Information has been issued to the Operations and Training Departments giving the conversion from percent to gallons for each tank, allowing use of QDPS to verify compliance with the Tech Specs. This information has been included in the operator requalification program.
2-4 11/23/87 8654c/0332c u______-___________________________________
HOUSTON CONTROL-ROOM
'1 IGHTING DESIGN REVIEW InodEI POWER CO.
DISPOSITION NOTES l
o puh
!^
HF AREA HED CATEGORY l
l NOTE NO.
DISPOSITION f
HED-1094 The QDPS displays are being revised to use appropriate flow ranges (Cat.C) for ECW flows. The QDPS display modifications required -are being performed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS modifications.
information has been issued to the Operations and Training Departments identifying the range problem and that flows may indicate off-scale high during normal flow operations. This information has been included in the operator requalification program.
HED-1095 The QDPS displays are being revised to reflect the current EOP (Cat.A) setpoints; however, several of the QDPS displays are designed in such a manner that the current EOP setpoints cannot be entered. The QDPS display modifications required are being performed as part of the aforementioned package of QDPS modifications. For the setpoints that cannot be properly adjusted in QDPS, information has been issued to the Operations and Training Departments identifying the setpoint adjustment problem and identifying interim instructions / solutions. This information has been included in the operator requalification program. The EOPs are also being revised to include cautions about the incorrect setpoints on the QDPS displays.
2-5 11/23/87 8654c/0332c j
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW i
..._..M POWE R CO.
TABLE 2-1 HED'S IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL IIED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page Title IIED-1001 D-6 Switch Action After " Quick-Release" HED-1002 B-15 Control Switch Action on Transfer Switch Panel IIED-1003 B-16 Standby Diesel Generator Emergency Stop Capability HED-1004 A-2 Feedback for CCW Flow to Reactor Coolant Pumps HED-1005 A-14 Safety Injection System Layout - Train / Subsystem Differentiation HED-1006 A-9 CCW/ECW Pump Labeling Similarity HED-1007 A-10 Labels and Mimic for CCW System HED-1008 A-Il Load Center Switches Used for ATWS Response HED-1009 A-6 Misleading Indication of Power Available to ESF Buses HED-1010 A-3 First-Out Windows Unreadable H ED-10ll A-4 Inadvertent Actuation of Annunciator Test Pushbutton HED-1012 B-45 Demarcation Color Pads for Panel CP010 Feeds to ESF Buses on Panel CP003 2-6 11/23/87 8654c/0332c J
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
- i. &
. _M POWER CO.
l TABLE 2-1 HED'S IDENTIFIED SINCE INTTIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page Title HED-1013 B-20 Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Flow Recorder Scales HED-1014 B-4 6 Recorder Pen Sequence Reversed From Indicator Sequence HED-1015 C-12 Feedback for Status of Reactor Makeup System HED-1016 B-31 Parallel Mimic Lines on Panel CP010 HED-1017 C-16 Incorrect Reflection of Charging Pump Valves on Panel CP004 HED-1018 C-13 Feedback for ESF Actuation Signal Reset HED-1019 C-17 ESF Signal Block Switch Labeling HED-1020 C-18 SI Power Lockout Switch Labeling HED-1021 C-19 SI Reset Switch Labeling HED-1022 C-25 QDPS/ERFDADS Display Abbreviations - Display Revisions HED-1023 C-26 QDPS Display Abbreviations - Criteria Revisions HED-1024 C-2 7 Zero/ Low Flow Indications on QDPS 2-7 11/23/87 8654c/0332c
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
)
l
.._ __..._ POWE R C O, L
TABLE 2-1 HED'S IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT 1
1 i
Number Page Title HED-1025 C-14 Inconsistent Position Indication for QDPS-Controlled Valves HED-1026 B-35 NIS Displays on QDPS and ERFDADS
]
HED-1027 C-28 QDPS/ERFDADS Display Inconsistencies l
HED-1028 D-9 Third Pen Visibility on Three Pen Recorders l
HED-1029 D-2 Controls Above 70 Inches l
HED-1030 B-2 Glare from Meters l
HED-1031 C-10 Legend Pushbutton LabelInconsistencies HED-1032 C-15 Steam and Feedwater Headers - Differential Pressure Determination HED-1033 B-36 Proteus and ERFDADS Use of Colors HED-1034 D-12 ERFDADS Normal and Critical Safety Function Designators on Displays H ED-1035 D-13 ERFD ADS Keys - Differentiation of " Shifted" and "Unshifted" Functions 2-8 11/23/87 8654c/0332c
i I
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWE R CO.
TABLE 2-1 HED'S IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page
-Title HED-1036 C-29 Abbreviations on Computer Displays HED-1037 B-37 Glare on Computer CRTs HED-1038 C-3'O Plant Computer Color Quality and Menu Listing Order HED-1039 D-14 Use of Periods on Computer Displays HED-1040 C-31 ERFDADS/ Plant Computer Labeling and Colors l
HED-1041 B-3 8 Tech Spec Level Presentation Inconsistencies j
l HED-1042 B-39 Proteus Display Error 1
Cross-Loop Comparison of RCS Temperatures (T,yg, T '
HED-1043 C-39 h
T, delta-T) g H ED-1044 B-47 VCT Pressure and Level Meters Differentiation HED-1045 A-12 Demarcation Inadequate for SG Level Meters and PORY Controls HED-1046 B-32 Labels Inconsistent with Meters Identified 2-9 11/23/87 8654c/0332c l
1 l
i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING
_ gggggy ggyggy
....__E P OW E R C O.
TABLE 2-1 J
HED'S IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page Title HED-1047 B-40 ERFDADS Unit Overwritten by Data Quality Character I
HED-1048 B-41 ERFDADS Display Errors on Valve Status l
2 I
HED-1049 B-42 ERFDADS Display Error on RHR Flow Range HED-1050 B-4 3 Radiation Monitoring Information Not Datalinked to ERFDADS 1
HED-1051 B-6 Bypass / Inoperable Indication - Phase A Isolation l
HED-1052 B-7 Bypass / Inoperable Indication - Main Steam Isolation HED-1053 B-8 Bypass / Inoperable Indication - Safety Injection HED-1054 B-9 Bypass / Inoperable Indication - RHR Heat Exchanger Valves HED-1055 C-6 Abbreviations on ESF Status Monitoring System HED-1056 C-7 Inconsistent / Incorrect Labels on ESF Status Monitoring System H ED-1057 C-20 Labeling of AFW Pump Turbine Trip Pushbutton HED-1058 C-21 Inconsistent Recorder Labels and Pen Labels for RCS Temperature 2-10 11/23/87 8654c/0332c O
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW 1
.._.._tEl POWE R CO.
{
TABLE 2-1 HED'S IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page Title HED-1059 B-44 ERFDADS Display Error on Valve Numbers HED-1060 C-2 Air Velocities Above Limits HED-1061 B-3 Lighting Levels Outside Requirements HED-1062 B-4 Inadequate Illumination Levels (Emergency Lighting)
HED-1063 B-5 Control Room Noise Levels HED-1064 C-32 ERFDADS Transfer Switch Position Descriptions HED-1065 C-33 ERFDADS and QDPS Displayed Values Differences HED-1066 B-10 Status Monitoring Not Provided After a LOOP HED-1067 B-l l Status Monitoring Alarms After LOOP for Components Not
]
Actuated
)
HED-1068 C-8 Seismic Monitoring Annunciation HED-1069 D-15 Color Meanings in Trend Graphs on ERFDADS HED-1070 C-34 SPDS Status Box Color Differentiation 2-11 1I/23/87 8654c/0332c L
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gggggy ggyggy
. _._E POWER CO.
TABLE 2-1 HED'S IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page Title
.I l
i HED-1071 D-16 SPDS Keys - Differentiation on ERFDADS Keyboards HED-1072 C-35 SPDS CSF Displays - No Color Changes for Alarm Conditions l
HED-1073 D-17 Cooling Coil and Heating Coil Symbols on Computer Displays i
l j
HED-1074 D-18 Data Presentation Order Difference Between QDPS and ERFDADS j
l HED-1075 C-36 AFW Flow Offscale High Indication l
HED-1076 D-10 Tech Spec Flow Value Readability on Meter Scale HED-1077 C-22 Demarcation / Labeling on HVAC Panel CP022 HED-1078 C-2 3 Labels for Power Source Identification HED-1079 B-17 Color Coding of Pushbuttons and Switches HED-1080 C-24 Open/Close Indication For RCS Purification Flow Controller HED-1081 B-12 Annunciator ar.d ESF Status Monitoring Lampbox Labels HED-1082 C-37 ERFDADS Inputs for ESF Actuation Signal Alarms Incomplete HED-1083 C-Il Inadvertent Actuation of Communications Console Switches 2-12 11/23/87 8654c/0332c
_ __ _________ _-_ a
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gggggy ggyjgy
..._ E POWER CO.
TABLE 2-1 HED'S IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page Title HED-1084 C-S Backup Power for Teleptione Equipment H ED-1085 D-4 Maintenance Communication System Jack Patch Panel Labeling 1
HED-1086 C-3 Procedures for Emergency Equipment Use j
HED-1087 C-4 Labeling of Storage Areas for Emergency Equipment f
HED-1088 D-3 Control Room Noise Level I
H ED-1089 C-9 Bypass / Inoperable Status Alarm for Normal Purge Containment Isolation Valves H ED-1090 D-7 Improper Color Coding of Switches on Panel CP010 HED-1091 D-11 Process Mimic Color-Coded by Train HED-1092 D-5 Temporary Identification on Annunciator Windows Actuated by ERFDADS HED-1093 D-8 Bypass / Inoperable Status Manual Pushbuttons -
Differentiation from Indicating Lights H ED-1094 C-38 Ranges for ECW Flow on QDPS and ERFDADS Displays 2-13 11/23/87 8654c/0332c o_---_________-.____
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING gggggy ggyggy
. __._ POWE R CO.
TABLE 2-1 HED'S IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Page Title HED-1095 A-13 Displayed EOP Operator Action Points Inconsistent with-EOPs j
H ED-1096 B-13 ESF Status Monitoring for Phase B Isolation l
i 2-14 11/23/87 l
8654c/0332c i
___.._..______a
1
-l I
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW 1
POWE R CO.
TABLE 2-2 1
l HED'S IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT I
I TITLE NUMBER PAGE Annunciator Horns S-510 A-5 l
Rototellite Lights S-367, 484, A-7 679,725, 748 l
l Legend Pushbutton S-703 B-18 Distinguishability from Legend Lights Knurled or J-Handle S-711, 734, B-19 Switches 695,705, 699,459 l
i Meter Zone Markings S-006, 288, B-21 676,299, 310,764, 787,480, 364,060, 912,961, 998 2-15 11/23/87 8654c/0332c
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
_ POWER CO.
TABLE 2-2 HED'S IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT TELJ NUMBER PAGE Intermediate Graduation S-671, 743, B-22 Marks for Scales.
650,782, 360,392, 475 Parameters Not Immediately S-716, 666, B-23 Usable from Meters 739,776, 470 Abbreviations on Meter Faces S-718, 668, B-24 1
741,757, 778,471, 404,406 Number of Graduations S-719, 670, B-25 I
Between Scale Markings 742,649, 759,781, 475,359, 334,329 2-16 11/23/87 8654c/0332c
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW TABLE 2-2
_...__.. POWE R C O.
HED'S IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT l
4 i
TITLE NUMBER PAGE Distinguishability of S-720, 672, B-26 Intermediate and Minor 744,651, Graduations on Scales 760,783, 476, 361 i
Meter Pointers Black vs. Red S-724, 675, B-27 747,655, j
i 763,786, 479,408, 911,960, 997 Incompatible Scales for S-871, 885 B-28 Parameters Which Must be Compared Inappropriate Ranges on S-877, 880, B-29 Meters 882,872, 873,884, 800,804, 808 4
2-17 11/23/87 8654c/0332c
_a
i 1
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM j
LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
..... POWER CD.
TABLE 2-2 HED'S IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT TULE NUMBER PAGE Scales Inconsistent with S-878, 879, B-30 Degree of Readability 881, 870,
- l Required 874, 883,'
799,803, i
807,892 Lettering Size on Labels S-584, 216, B-33 692, 637, 615, 626, 449,437, 345,342 Stroke Width-to-Character S-591, 693, B-3 4 Height Ratio and Engraving 602,639, Inconsistencies on Labels 618,630, 447,440, 343,346 2-18 11/23/87 8654c/0332c L
- (
-i I
i HGusTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
\\
g POWER CD.
l CATEGORY A HED DEPOSITIONS j
A-1 11/23/87 8597c/0332c
B HOUSTON CONTRO' L ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
_,.M POWER CO.
j A
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSIT10N OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE I
PARAGRAPH HED-1004 There is no direct feedback-The high flow switch has been P -6.3.1.2 for component cooling water replaced with a high/ low flow 3
P -8.1 flow to the reactor coolant switch. The annunciator and 2
l pump thermal barriers. High computer provide the CCW low flow is determined by means flow alarms to the operator.
of a high flow switch.
Normal flow can only be determined indirectly by a time consuming process of checking status of numerous l
valves and operation of a l
CCW pump.
REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Reference P} is STP Criteria Report number Note:
P2 11/23/87 8597c/0332c A-2
____________.a
g HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW 9t!OJM POWER CO.
^ " " " '
A HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1010 The "first-out" windows are The coloring of the "first-out" P -6.3.3.5 unreadable when lit because annunciator windows has been changed to g
P -8.6.ll the letters are white on a white with black letters. ( The red 2
red window and tend to wash border around the "first out" group of out.
windows was retained.)
REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A Note: Reference P i
i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 8597c/0332c A-3
' HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
\\
...E POWER CO.
A
)
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OlSPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-10ll The annunciator " TEST" push A guard has been installed over each P -6.3.4.2 pushbutton was inadvertently annunciator system " TEST" pushbutton g
P -8.4.3.D depressed several times while to differentiate it from the " SILENCE",
2 actually trying to " SILENCE"
" ACKNOWLEDGE" and " RESET" pushbuttons or "R ESET" the annunciator, and to prevent inadvertent activation of the system test.
i l
REF:
1' EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A l
i l
l i
I i
l l
Note: Reference Pj is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 8597c/0332c A-4
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
~~ &
,E9 POWER CO.
HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY A OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-510 Original annunciator design To correct this discrepancy, six P -6.3.2.1 provides for only one DC horns have been installed in the g
P -8.4.1 buzzer.
control room.
2 1
A IIuman Factors evaluation during December 1986 has determinate that the installation of audible devices meets the criteria.
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE A-2 Note: Reference Pg is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 8597c/0332c A-5
~i
. HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM -
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW"
......... ' POWE R C O.
Visual Displays A.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUM8ER DISPOSITION :-
OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1009
'Ihe blue " Power Available" Power available should be ' determined P -6.5.3.2 lights on CP003 indicate
_ by using the voltmeter between the g
P -App.H motor operated disconnect.
13.8 kV/4160V transformer mimic and 2
- H.1 switch position and not thel the 4160V supply breaker switch.
Engineered Safety Features The purpose of the lights has been (ESP) 4160 V bus voltage.
clarified to indicate to the operator This gives false indication whether and which feed from the 13.8 kV that of fsite power is buses is lined up. The indicating ~
, j available and energizing the light color has been revised to red. -
ESF buses.
The light input has been revised to 1
indicate that the supply breaker ~
I from that 13.8 kV busis in the closed position. Since the supply breaker cannot be closed unless the correspond-l ing disconnect switch is closed,
)
this light indicates that the supply breaker and disconnect switch from that l
13.8 kV bus are both in the closed l
position.
Information has been issued to the Operations and Training Departments identifying the above resolution; REF:
this information is being included EOP VALIDATION REPORT in the operator requalification APPENDIX A program.
Note: Reference Pg is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 8597c/0332c A-6
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
- _..EE} &
POWER CO.
I l
Visual Displays HED CATEGORY A HF AREA NUM8ER O BSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH 1
S-367 Rototellite green light color This HED was reviewed by a task S-484 is not distinguishable.
team and the following is noted:
S-679 S-725 Where panel space limitation was not a S-748 factor, the rototellites were replaced P -6.5.3.1 with conventional indicating lights.
3 P -App.H This occurred on panels CP001, CP002, 2
H.1 CP003, CP004, CP005 and CP006.
H.2.2 H.3.1 The rototellites were retained on panels CP007 and CP008 due to panel space limitation.
A space limitation problem was encountered on panel CP022 where rototellites are installed, but was not considered to be a problem since these are positioned on a vertical surface.
The vendor advises that these rototellites are a standard design used in numerous nuclear power plant control room applications. The STP circuit design is such that the bulbs will operate at approximately 5 percent above the rated voltage, thereby.
increasing the intensity but somewhat reducing the life expectancy.
i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 8597c/0332c A-7 e.
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. _..M POWER CO.
A isual Displays HED CATEGORY HF AREA OBSERt ATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH A Human Factors evaluation performed during December 1986 has determined that these lights meet the criteria and the visibility under actual operating conditions is acceptable.
i I
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGES A-4, A-5 l
P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Note: Reference i2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 8597c/0332c A-8 l
a
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW 1
.. E9 POWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids A
i HF AREA HED CATEGORY f
OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION l
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE j
PARAGRAPH 1
HED-1006 Labelling of the CCW and ECW The nameplates have been revised P;-6.6.3.6 pump switches is too similar, to spell out the full names of P -6.4.1.2 The CCW and ECW switches are the pumps. Additionally the CCW 2
6.4.5.E close to each other and and ECW systems have been 6.4.5.H operators have used the demarcated with different wrong switch.
shades of paint.
REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Note: Reference 12 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 8597c/0332c A-9
l
' HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW j
i
. ECT POWER CO.
l HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY A
1 f
OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH IIED-1007 Labe'.s and mimic for the-The lat'els and mimic have been P -6.6.1.2 component cooling water (CCW) revised to improve descriptions, g
6.6.3.2 syste o sre inadequate.
eliminate possible confusion, better 6.6.6.4 reflect system arrangement and P -6.4.1.3 provide differentiation between trains.
2 6.4.5 q
App.N While the identified safety concerns N.I.2 have been addressed, a program is ongoing to ensure that labels are accurate and adequate. Additional consideration is being given to mimic enhancement.
j REF:
i EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A 1
Note: Reference P i
i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P 2 s STP Criteria Report number 1
11/23/87 8597c/0332c A-10
___________a
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
. LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.._E9 POWER CO.
a e s and Locadon Ms A
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1008 The load center switches on The handles of those particular P;-6.6.1.1 CP010 that must be actuated switches have been color coded to 6.6.6.3 to de-energize the control provide a contrast to other P -App.S rod drive motor generator switches.
2 S.4.E (MG) sets after an "Anticipa-ted Transient Without Scram" (ATWS) are not easily identi-fiable.
REF:
EOP VALID ATION REPORT APPENDIX A i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference PP is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 8597c/0332c A-11
1 i
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM i
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
\\
i
. _.. E9 POWE R CO.
i HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY A
OBSERVATION NU BER OR DISPOSITION
{
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE
)
PARAGRAPH IIED-1045 Existing demarcation on CP006 Demarcation lines have been added I
P -6.6.6.2 does not prevent association to separate the SG groups.
g P -6.8.1.3 of SG 18 level meters with SG 2
6.5.1.3 1 A PORV control and SG 1D App. N level meters with SG IC PORY j
N.l.1 control.
l REF:
RANDOM SAMPLE REVIEW OF DEMARCATION PAINTING (EXECUTIVE SUMM AR Y ADDEND A, SECTION 5.0, ITEM 8)
Note: Reference Pi s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 8597c/0332c A-12
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
. [_M POWER CO.
i HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY A OBSERVATION NUMBER OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1095 Operator action points shown For the discussion of QDPS revisions, P -6.7.2.7 on QDPS and ERFDADS displays see Di.sposition Note CPT-1.
3 P -II.l.1 are not consistent with the 2
EOPs in all cases.
The ERFD ADS displays are being modified to reflect the current EOP setpoint s.
l REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
l l
l l
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 1
P i
2 s STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 8597c/0332c A-13 w________
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW i
..... POWE R CO.
A' Panel Layout HED CATEGORY HF AREA O BSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION
-l OR REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH i
HED-1005 The Safety Injection System Mimics have been revised to clearly l
P -6.8.1.3 layout is confusing. The differentiate between the SIS trains g
P -6.5.1.3 three trains and various sub-and subsystems.
l 2
systems are not clearly i
differentiated.
i i
REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
l Note: Reference PP is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 8597e/0332c A-14
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
H"
- DESIGN REVIEW
. _...._ POWE R CO.
CATEGORY B HED DISPOSITIONS i
B-1 11/23/87 6814V/0184V
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gggggy ggyjg y 1.
.... E9 POWE R CO.
j Workspace HED CATEGORY B
HF AREA O BSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH I
HED-1030 Glare exists from meters on Lighting modifications have been S-0177 panels CP001 through CP010.
performed in the control room to
)
P-address lighting concerns.
f g
6.1.5.3.f Another evaluation is being performed P -App.D to establish proper lighting levels 2
D. I.2.G (see HED-1061) and then identify any remaining glare concerns. Should glare problems be found, corrective actions will be determined and implemented.
{
I l
REF:
l CATEGORY E EVALU ATIONS l
l l
l 1
1 i
I i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-2
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW THI POWER CO.
HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY B
NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1061 With Control Room lighting Additionallight fixtures have been S-0170 at maximum setting, criteria added near panels CP004 and CP005.
P-levels not satisfied are:
The light survey is being repeated 3
6.1.5.3.a to establish a control band for light P -App.D o Maximum of 50 footcandles dimmers. Lighting levels will be 2
D.I.2 on CP002, CP001, CP007, maintained in the control band through CP 08, CP009 administrative controls, o Minimum of 20 footcandles on CP004, CP005 With lighting at reduced level (rheostats at 8 o' clock), levels not satisfied are o Minimum of 20 footeandles on CP004, CP005 REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P i
2 s STP Criteria Report number 6814V/0184V B-3
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
..,E,I POWER CO.
C HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH J
HED-1062
'Ihe emergency lighting Additional lighting has been provided S-0182 illumination levels on for the main control panel horseshoe P-panels CP001, CP004, CP006, area. Lights have been balanced be-3 6.1.5.4.c and CP010 do not meet the tween the two banks of lighting.
1 P -App.D 10 footcandle requirement.
Another lighting evaluation is being 2
l D.I.3.B performed to include phnels CP001 j
l through CP010 and panels CP018 and CP022 as well.
1 I
REF:
CATEGOIlY E EVALUATIONS i
l l
j I
1 1
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-4 l
, _ _ _ _ _ _ g
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
,,. ai
._KI POWER CO.
W rkspace B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITl0N i
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH IIED-1063 Noise levels in the control The Control Room HVAC system has been S-0184 room with two and three revised and balanced to reduce noise P-trains of HVAC operating levels per the design criteria. A g
l 6.1.5.5.a exceed the 65 dB(A) follow-up survey was performed, which l
P -App.D limit, resulting in showed that noise levels are within the 2
l D.I.4.0 communication difficulty.
criteria except for one operating configuration at one representative S-0185 location. This exception has been P-documented as HED-1088 (Category D).
g 6.1.5.5.a P -App.D Based upon the resurvey, this HED 2
D. I.4. C is considered resolved.
l l
S-0186 l
6.1.5.5.b P -App.D 2
D.l. 4. D 1
3-0187 P-3 6.1.5.5.c P -App.D 2
D.I.4. E REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P} is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 6814V/0184Y B-5
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING g g SlG y g g yjg w
.... M POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH H ED-1051 The Containment Isolation The ESF Status Monitoring System is P -6.3.1.2 Phase A signal to several being revised to provide Bypass /Inop 3
P -10.2.B valves is defeated by moving windows for these valves on the 2
the transfer switch away from Containment Isolation Phase A lampbox the " Control Room" position.
and delete the windows on the incorrect However Bypass /Inop indica-la mpbox.
tion for these valves is not J
shown on the Containment Isolation Phase A lampbox.
Valves in question are:
Train A: FV-2454 Train B: FV-2455, FV-4823 Train C: FV-4454, FV-4455, FV-2458 REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-6
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l
LIGHTING gggggy ggyjgy
~&
__..M POWE R CO.
I Annunciator HED CATEGORY _ B HF AREA OBSERVATION l
NUMBER OR DISPOSITION l
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1052 The Main Steam Isolation The ESF Status Monitoring System is P -6.3.1.2 signal for the drain valves being revised to provide Bypass /Inop g
P -10.2.B is defeated by moving the windows for the main steam drain valves 2
transfer switch away from on the Steam Line Isolation lampbox the Control Room position; and delete the windows on the incorrect however Bypass /Inop indica-la mpbox.
tion for these valves is not I
shown on the Steam Line l
l Isolation lampbox. Valves l
l are FV-7900 A, FV-7901 A, FV-7902 A, and FV-7903 A.
I REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION I
i 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-7
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. ).M OWER CO.
]
1 HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY B
l l
NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION j
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1053
'Ihe Safety injection signal The ESF Status Monitoring System is P -6.3.1.2 is defeated for the being revised to provide Bypass /Inop 3
P -10.2.B Radiation Monitoring and windows for these components on the i
2 10.2.C Hydrogen Analyzer room fans Control Room and Combustible Gas by moving the transfer switch Control lampboxes (2M60, 2M 61, 22 M10, away from the " Control Room" 22M04 and 22M06). The windows are i
position. However Bypass /
being deleted on the incorrect lampbox.
Inop indication for these fans is not shown on the Control Room or Combustible Gas Control lampboxes.
1 l
l l
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Note: Reference P
i i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 6814V/0184V B-8
p HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
- !!0]El POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR 0;SPOSIT10N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1054 RHR heat exchanger bypass and The ESF Status Monitoring System is P;-
flow control valves are shown being revised by moving the windows 6.3.3.3.b for Bypass /Inop statu: in the from the RHR system block to the LHSI P -10.2.C RHR section of the Safety syste-block in the SI lampboxes 2
Injection lampboxes. However (typical all three trains).
1 the Bypass /Inop status is applicable to the LHSI portion instead, based upon the alarm condition.
During full power operation, the operator would believe the RHR system to be inop-erable rather ther. the SI system. During RHR condi-tions, when flow is being throttled and the heat exchanger bypassed, the windows would always be lit.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
i Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number l
i P
11/23/87 6814V/0184y B-9
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW.
....M POWER CO.
A""""
8 B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1066 During a loss of offsite The input to the ESF Status Monitoring P -6.3.1.2 power (LOOP), the ESF Systern fail-to-actuate subsystem has g
P -10.2.D Status Monitoring System been revised, using the ESF load 2
does not provide indication sequencer output indicating a LOOP of components that failed condition. Thus after a LOOP, to actuate properly in components failing to operate pro-response to the LOOP. The perly are alarmed through the fall-input provided is inappropri-to-actuate subsystem of ESF Status ate, showing only bus under-Monitoring, voltage condition, which is removed when the standby diesel generator provides power to the bus. Thus operators do not receive in-dication of which components failed to actuate, which is the function of the fail-to-actuate subsystem.
REF:
STARTUP OBSERVATION Note: Reference Pj is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-10
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.... E, ! POW E R C O.
]
.o c
HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY B
j OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH l
HED-1067 The ESF Status Monitoring ERFDADS provides equipment status P -6.3.1.2 System logic provides information for use in the ESF Status 3
P -10.2.D fail-to-actuate alarms Monitoring System logic. The ERFDADS 2
during a loss-of-offsite software has been modified such that HVAC components; however information provided to ESF Status these components are not Monitoring, when acted upon by that actuated on LOOP.
logie, results in alarms for components only when the component should have I
operated and did not operate properly following a LOOP.
REF:
STARTUP OBSERVATION 3 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
P2 s STP Criteria Report number i
11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-11
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gggggy ggyjgy_
....J.9 POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1081 Annunciator and ESF Status Temporary labels for the annunciator P;-6.3.3.1 Monitoring lampboxes do not and ESP Status Monitoring lampboxes 6.6.5.1 have labels corresponding to are being replaced with permanent l
P -6.4.1.2 annunciator response pro-labels.
2 cedures. Temporary labels are currently in use.
R EF:
OPER ATOR OBSERVATION l
l l
)
l l
l P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number J
Note: Reference i
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-12
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
._. @ POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION l
OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE l
PARAGRAPH H ED-1096 Currently Phase B bypass /
Phase A windowbox is being P -6.3.3.1 inoperable and fall-to-revised as follows:
3 6.3.3.3 actuate indications are P -8.5.1.2 shown using the Phase A A) Relabel as Phase A/ Phase B.
2 l
isolation ESF Status B) Differentiate between and Monitoring windowbox. The label Phase A and Phase B bypass / inoperable windows bypass / inoperable system for Phase B are not indications and component differentiated from the windows.
Phase A windows; the Phase B C) Differentiate between and fail-to-actuate windows are label Phase A and Phase B not clearly differentiated fall-to-ectuate system i
from the Phase A component indications and component 1
windows. (Use of the Phase windows.
A windowbox for Phase B D) Provide Phase B signal indications was implemented presence window in manner as an interim fix until a consistent with other ESFAS long-term design could be signals.
be implemented.)
This situation leads to operator confusion as to where the Phase B isolation ESF Status Monitoring is displayed in the Control Note: Reference Pj is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
2 s STP Criteria Report number P
11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-13
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN ' REVIEW '
0WER CD.
i Annunciator B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET OBSERVATION l
NUMBER DISPOSITION '
i OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH Room. Also the light location used to indicate f
Phase B actuation is a I
fall-to-actuate window and l
l thus tends to indicate an abnormal condition when one does not in fact exist.
I REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
1 I
Note: Reference P} is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-14
HOUSTON -
CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
..M POWE R CD.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUNIBER OR DISP 051Tl0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH IIED-1002 Control switches installed The control switches on Transfer Switch P-on Transfer Switch Panel Panel ZLP-701 have been changed so that g
6.4.1.1.c ZLP-701 for control of the their action is identical to those on i
P -4.3.1 RHR system sample select Main Control Panel CP002 and meet the 2
5.4 valves do not have the same CRDR criteria.
action as the switches located on Main Control
)
Panel CP002 which control
]
the same valves.
l l
Both Main Control Panel and Transfer Switch Panel Control 1
Switches are required to meet the same criteria established in the Control Room Design Review Criteria Report.
i REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
Note: Reference P) is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
6814V/0184V B-15 i
l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.... ECI POWE R CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1003 Emergency stop capability An " Emergency Stop" switch in the P -6.4.1.1 for shutting down the Standby control room is being provided 3
6.1.1.1 Diesel Generators from the for each Standby Diesel Generator P -6.2.1 Control Room is not provided.
to override the start signal and stop 2
6.1.1.1 Thus, if the diesel the diesel.
l generator's cooling water j
fails, the generator might overheat before it can be stopped locally.
REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A l
l l
1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-16
I
\\
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW ht$ POWER CO.
HF AREA Controls-HED CATEGORY H
OBSERVATION NUMBER OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1079 Trip / actuate and reset The trip / actuate switches are P -6.4.1.2 pushbuttons are inconsistent being color coded red; push-l g
6.4.2.2 in color coding (red vs.
buttons are being provided with l
P-white) and use of guards.
guards. Additionally, reset 2
6.2.1.10 There is also no color switches are being color coded coding of the Electro-white; guards are not being switches used for ESFAS provided for reset pushbuttons actuation.
. since no significant adverse i
effects will result from reset.
I I
l l
REF:
j ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P2 is STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-17 1
E--------------------------------------
4
HOUSTGN CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CD.
8 B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-703 Legend pushbuttons on the A special study recommended the P -6.4.3.3 main turbine insert panels
" Closed Corner Octagon" marking for 3
P -App.E are not readily distinguish-the controls. Refer to Special 2
E.1.5.1 able from legend lights.
Studies Report, " Distinguishing Legend Pushbutton from Legend Lights."
The study recommendation has been Implemented. A Iluman Factors i
evaluation has been performed during December 1986 and the implementation has been found satisfactory.
REF:
I HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B-8 l
l l
l l
l 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-18 E-- -
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
._.. M POWE R CO.
ntrols U
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-711
" Select" function switches These switches were initially changed l
S-734 and pump or fan control to knurled handles for " select" S-695 switches are not provided functions and J-handles for pump or fan S-705 with knurled or J-handles control.
S-699 respectively on panels i
S-459 CP001, CP003, CP004, A special study recommended lever P -6.4.1.1 CP005, CP006, and CP007.
handles for " select" functions. Refer 3
P -6.2.1 to Special Studies Report, " Knurled 2
Knob Position Indicator."
The study recommendation has been implemented. A Human Factors evaluation has been performed during December 1986 and the implementation has been found satisfactory.
R EF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B-9 1
l 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 l
1 6814V/0184V B-19 c___________-___________-____________.__________________
)
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW n,
. _.. EC! POWE R CO.
U Visual Displays '
HED CATEGORY HF AREA OBSERVATION l
NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1013 The scales on the reactor The signal conditioning for the j
P -6.5.1.5 coolant pump seal flow logarithmic flows is being revised 3
P -App.F recorders are a mixture of so that all three inputs 2
F.5 linear and logarithmic are linear.
]
(square root) scales.
I 1
I I
R EF:
EOP VALID ATION REPORT APPENDIX A l
t i
i i
1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-20
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
=&
...M POWER CO.
8" E8 B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY S"
OBSERVATION l
NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-006 Meter zone markings are not A zone coding scheme has been S-288 used to denote operational developed.
S-676 Implications.
S-299 A Human Factors evaluation S-310 of the materials and methods to be S-764 used has been performed during S-787 December 1986; the zone coding S-480 implementation method has been S-364 determined to meet the criteria S-060 via actual demonstration.
S-912 l
S-961 Implementation of the meter zone S-998 coding throughout the control room l
P;-6.5.2. 3 has been completed.
P -App.F 2
F.6 REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT
]
PAGE B-13 l
2 l
1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Notes Reference P
i 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-21
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.__M POWER CO.
Visual Displays U
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-671 Intermediate graduation Engineering documents such as the S-743 marks are not used on meter scale drawings have been S-650 scales with five or more corrected.
S-782 graduations between S-360 num erals.
New meter scales have been installed.
S-392 A Human Factors evaluation performed S-475 during December 1986 has determined P -6.5.1.5 that the installed scales meet the 3
P -App.F criteria.
2 F.4.C l
R EF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B-17 Note: Reference Pg is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
6814V/0184V B-22
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING g gggg y gg ygg y
'.E OWER CO.
sua sp ays B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET OBSERVATION NUM8ER OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-716 Meters contain parameters Engineering documents such as the S-666 which are in a form that is meter scale drawings have been S-739 not immediately usable by corrected.
]
S-776 the operator.
S-470 New meter scales have been in-P -6.5.1.2 stalled. A Human Factors evalu-3 P -APP.F ation performed during December 1986 2
F.1 has been determined that the installed scales meet the criteria.
)
)
l REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT l
l PAGE B-15 t
P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Note: Reference 12 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-23 1
i i
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.. M POWER CO.
1
.i B
HF AREA ' sua splays HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION i
NUMBER DISPOSITION OR l
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE 4
PARAGRAPH S-718 Standard abbreviations are Engineering documents such as the l
S-668 not used on meter faces.
meter scale drawings have been S-741 corrected.
S-757 S-778 New meter scales have been installed.
S-471 A Human Factors evaluation performed S-404 during December 1986 has determined S-406 that the installed scales meet the 1
(
P -6.5.1.4 criteria.
3 P -App.F
.j 2
F.3 i
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B-16 i
1 e
i J s N'UREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
~~ &
.. M ' POWER CO.
Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B
HF AREA OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-719 There are more than nine Engineering documents such as the S-670 graduations between scale meter scale drawings have been S-742 numerals.
corrected.
S-649 S-759 New meter scales have been installed.
S-781 A Human Factors evaluation performed-S-475 during December 1986 has determined S-359 that the installed scales meet the S-334 criteria.
S-329 P -6.5.1.5 g
P -App.F 2
F.4. A R EF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B-17 P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Note: Reference 12 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-25
i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
...1M POWER CO.
B-Visual Displays HED CATEGORY HF AREA OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE Cr '4 ERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-720 It is difficult to distin-The meter task team has applied the S-672 guish between intermediate following criteria to the meter scale 3-744 and minor graduation marks redesign effort (graduation mark S-651 on meter scales.
thickness): Major graduations S-760 3-point or 3/64-inch; intermediate S-783 graduations 2-point or 1/32-inch; S-476 Minor graduations 1-point or 1/64-inch.
S-361 Engineering documents such as the l
P -6.5.1.5 meter scale drawings have been 3
P -App.F corrected.
I 2
F.4 New meter scales have been installed.
A Human Factors evaluation determined that the installed scales meet the criteria.
1 REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B-18 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-26
i
(
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM -
t.lGHTIN G gggggy ggyjgy
.E9 POWER CO.
HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B
SHEET OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE q
PARAGRAPH S-724 Meter pointers are black in-The possibility of painting the black l
S-675 stead of red.
pointers red was investigated but
]
S-747 deemed not feasible. Painting pointers S-655 leads to instrument inaccuracies.
j S-763 Meters with black pointers are being
~
S-786 replaced with ones with red pointers.
S-479 S-408 S-911 S-960 S-997 P -6.5.2.2 3
P -App.G 2
j G.2.3
\\
l REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B-19 l
l 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 B-27 6814V/0184y L _ __. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._
______________________m
1 HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DEslGN REVIEW.
_.._ E9 POWER CO.
sua splays 0
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-871 Parameters which must be New meter scales have been installed S-885 compared have meter scales and a Human Factors evaluation P -6.5.1.5 with incompatibio numerical performed during December 1986 3
P -App.F progression and scale determined that the installed scales 2
F.5 organization.
meet the criteria.
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B-19 l
l i
l 1
l I
i 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-28 l
l 4
i E
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW MECI POWER CO.
8 B
l HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-877 Meters have inappropriate Engineering documents such as the S-880
- ranges, meter scale drawings have been S-882 corrected to reflect the correct S-872 ranges.
S-873 S-884 New meter scales have been installed.
S-800 A Human Factors evaluation performed S-804 during December 1986 has determined S-808 that the installed scales meet the P -6.5.1.2 criteria.
3 P -App.F 2
F.1.3 R EF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B-16 Note: Reference P 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-2 9
,l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW 4,
... KI POWER CO.
Visual Displays B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH i
'I S-878 Scales are not consistent The meter task team has matched the S-879 with the degree of precision meter scales to the operating S-881 and accuracy required.
procedures requirements. Engineering S-870 documents such as the meter scale S-874 drawings have been corrected.
.l S-883 i
S-799 New meter scales have been installed.
S-803 A Iluman Factors evaluation performed S-807 during December 1986 has determined S-892 that the installed scales meet the P -6.5.1.2 criteria.
g P -App.F 2
I F.1.1 l
l R EF:
1 HED RESOLUTION REPOR'I PAGE B-15 i
1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-30
1 HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW.
f
..... POWE R CO.
Labels and Location Aids B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUM8ER.
DISPOSITION l
OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1016 The mimic for the 13.8 kV The parallel orange mimic lines P -6.6.6.4 bus on panel CP010 is that represent the 13.8 kV buses 3
P -App.N confusing because of are being differentiated amongst 2
N.I.2 the number of the parallel themselves by adding black dashes horizontal paths shown.
and boxes onto the existing mimic lines. Mimic lines without added marking, with dashes added, and with boxes added are easily distinguishable from each other.
REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A i
a 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-31
H OUSTON.
CONTROL ROOM.
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
~~ &
__. KI POWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY O BSERVATION NUM8ER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1046 Labels "SG FW INLET' and The labels have been reversed, so P -6.6.3.1 "SGFP SUCT HDR"do not that the label is provided for 3
P -6.4.5.I correspond to the meters
.the appropriate meter.
2 they identify.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-32
pp HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
'#0lKI POWER CO.
sa cad n A s B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S-584 One hundred and seventy An extensive study corrected this S-216 three labels on CP003 HED. The study is described in S-692 use 0.125 inch letter Note L-1 of the HED Resolution S-637 which allows a viewing Report and included reviews of S-615 distance of only 21 inches.
subtended visual angles, reviews S-626 by plant operations personnel and S-449 other tasks.
S-437 S-345 A Human Factors evaluation performed S-342 during December 1986 has determined P -6.6.4.1 that component labels are now suitable g
P -App.M for a viewing distance of 42 inches 2
M.I.A as identified in Criteria Report, Appendix V, Table 4-1.
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT PAGE B-25 Note: Reference P
i i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-33
' HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW i
.._ E9 POWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids B
HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION N
BER DISPOSITION 3
OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE 1
PARAGRAPH i
l S-591 Stroke width-to-character An extensive study corrected this S-693 height ratio is not be-HED. The study is described in S-602 tween 1:6 and 1:8 on the Note L-1 of the HED Resolution S-639 service engraving and Report and included reviews of S-618 engraving is inconsistent, stroke width-to-character height S-630 ratios, reviews by plant operations S-447 personnel and other tasks.
S-440 S-343 A Human Factors evaluation performed S-346 during December 1986 has determined P -6.6.4.1 that stroke width-to-character height
)
3 P -App.M ratio was between 1:6 and 1:8 as' l
2 M.I.G identified in Criteria Report, j
Appendix V, Section 4.3.
]
I 1
REF:
HED RESOLUTION REPORT j
PAGE B-25 l
i 1
i l
P1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 B-34 6814V/0184V
I I
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW 1.,
__. E,CI POWE R CO.
1 l
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1026 NIS displays on QDPS and For the discussion of QDPS P -6.7.2.4 ERFDADS identify readings revisions, see Disposition g
P -App.Q for power range neutron flux Note CPT-1.
2 i
Q.4.A by letters A, B, C and D.
The displays on ERFDADS It is not clear whether RCS are being revised to clearly loops or channel separation indicate which channel (I, II, groups are being identified.
III, IV) is being shown.
Additionally the bar graph display of power range neutron flux is being revised to show the corresponding RCS loop.
R EF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
I I
I i
l P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Note: Reference 3
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
6814V/0184V B-35
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
-... ECT POWE R CO.
HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY R
SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION i
OR DISPOSITION i
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1033 The Proteus computer use Color convention problems are being re-S-0812 of color deviates from viewed and resolved on both the Proteus P -6.7.2.7 Appendix S of the Criteria and ERFDADS computers. Color criteria g
P -App.S Report. 'Ihe most signi-are also being clarified. The usage of 2
S.3 ficant problem is the use of magenta for text, other than alarm l
magenta for parameter bars messages, has been eliminated.
and text. Magenta is the color designated for Priority 1 Alarm Messages.
1 i
Both the Proteus and ERFDADS computers use colors in a manner which deviates from the criteria.
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS P is MUREG-0700 Section 6 number Note: Reference i
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 6814V/0184V B-36
HOUSTON CONTROL' ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. _ E9 POWER CO.
Computers B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH l
HED-1037
- 1. The CRTs on the consoles CRTs are being provided with a non-P -6.7.2.1 have a glare problem due reflective covering.
1 P -App.Q to the direct streaming 2
Q.l.B of light from the overhead light fixtures.
- 2. The ERFDADS panel-mounted CRTs have a reflectance problem. They act as a mirror, displaying the control room prominently, and present a distraction to the operator.
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P} is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-37
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW 1
8n l
... Efl POWER CO.
B Computers HED CATEGORY HF AREA O BSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION
.i OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH i
HED-1041 There is inconsistency in A study has been performed to identify S-0812 information presentation all inconsistencies in Tech Spec tank P -6.7.2.4 among the Tech Specs, CR level presentations in the control i
6.5.1.2 displays and computer room. (The inconsistency noted applies P -App.Q displays. For example, only to tank levels. Other Tech Spec 2
l Q.4.A
- 1) RWSTlevelindicator parameters are consistently displayed I
l App.F scale is in gals; QDPS to the operator.) In order to allow l
F.1.1 is displayed in percent.
direct comparison of the Tech Spec
- 2) BATlevelindicator requirement and the actual tank level, scale is in gals; QDPS all tank levels will be shown in the is displayed in percent.
Tech Spec level unit.
For the discussion of QDPS revisions, see Disposition Note CPT-1.
Recorder and meter scales and ERFD ADS tank level displays are being revised as necessary to reflect gallons.
l REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS j
l i
l 1
note: neIerence el is Nunt0-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
6814V/0184V B-38 I
1 l
\\
HOUSTON CONTROL ' ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. E9 POWER CD.
Computers B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE
]
PARAGRAPH l
l HED-1042 On Proteus display CW-010 The graphics error has been S-0825 (Cire. Water Pump Status),
corrected.
P -6.7.2.4 the motor upper guide g
P -App.Q bearing temperature is 2
Q.4 displayed as the pump bearing temperature and vice versa for one of the circulating water pumps.
l REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS l
I
'I l
l l
l i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number a
i Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P l
11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-39 l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM.
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.M POWER CO.
Computers B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH l
HED-1047 On the ERFDADS Critical The display is being modified to P -6.7.2.4 Safety Function display avoid the overwrite condition g
P -App.Q for Containment (CSF-Z),
such that the data quality 2
l Q.4 for containment wide range character and the units are both water level on each train, displayed.
the letter "I" of "IN" (for indhes) is over-I written by the data quality character.
l 1
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
i h
P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number h: te: Reference 12 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-40 i
1 HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW l
.....M POWER CO.
HF AREA HED ' CATEGORY I
0BSERVAT10N NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1048 On the ERFDADS Normal The ERFDADS displays are being P -6.7.2.4 Safety Function displays modified to display the correct g
P -App.Q for RCS Integrity and Con-information.
2 Q.4 tainment (NSF-P and NSF-Z respectively), incorrect information is displayed.
On NSF-P, the flags for pressurizer PORY, safety and head vent valves read OPN ("open"). These should read N/CLSD ("not closed").
On NSF-Z the flag for containment ventilation isolation valve inopera-bility reads F/CLS 1
(" fall to close"), but should read INOP
(" inoperable status").
REF:
1 ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
3 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-41 L_________--
I
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
_ E.9 POWER CD.
B Computers HED CATEGORY HF AREA OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH IIED-1049 On the ERFDADS Normal The display is being corrected for the bar graph to read from 0 to-P -6.7.2.4 Safety Function display,
g P -App.Q for Core Cooling (NSF-C),
12,000 GPM.
2 Q.4 the scale for total RHR flow is shown as 0-1200 GPM. The total RHR flow ranges from 0 to 12,000 GPM.
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS I
i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
6814V/0184V B-42
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW MECI POWER CO.
Computers B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1050 Values for RCB atmosphere The identified parameters are being P; -6.7.2.4 radioactivity level, used added to the datalink from the P -App.Q on ERFDADS Normal Safety Radiation Monitoring System to 2
Q.4 Function displays, are not ERFDADS and the ERFDADS database available on the datalink is being updated. These steps will from the Radiation Monitor-provide the necessary values for the ing Sys' tem to ERFDADS.
displays.
These values are the RCB atmosphere noble gas and particulate radioactivity levels, and are used on the RCS Integrity and Containment NSF displays.
R EF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference Pg is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P
i 2 s STP Criteria Report number 6814V/0184V B-43
. HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
..[M POWER CO.
Computers U
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION
)
OR REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1059 On ERFDADS display CV-02, The display is being revised to show P -6.7.2.4 the centrifugal c'iarging the correct valve numbers. The i
3 P -App.Q pump normal discharge input variables have been verified 2
Q.4 valves are shown with as correct.
incorrect (reversed) l l
valve numbers.
Inputs to display may be incorrect as well.
I REF:
l OPERATOR OBSERVATION j
1
\\
i i
1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6814V/0184V B-44
HOUSTON CONTROL ~ ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. _E9 POWER CO.
B Panel Layout HED CATEGORY HF AREA OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1012 The panel demarcation color The panel demarcation color pads P -6.8.1.3 pads for the power feeds on have been revised to include the 3
P-Main Control Room panel CP010 circuit breaker and the motor-2 6.5.1.3. C to the Engineered Safety operated disconnect switch.
Features (ESF) buses on CP003 do not adequately identify that both a circuit breaker and a motor-operated dis-connect switch must be closed to feed the Class IE bus.
R EF:
EOP YALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 3814V/0184V B-45
i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM.
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
..... POWE R CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1014 Recorder pens for steam The recorder pen inputs have been re-P; -6.8.2.3 generator water level and vised so that the recorder pen and
]
P -6.5.2.3 feedwater and steam flow indicator sequence are in agreement.
2 are reversed relative to
-I the sequence left to right of the indicators located j
above the recorder and showing the same para-m eters.
R EF:
EOP YALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A
'l l
1 l
1 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
P is STP Criteria Report number l
2 6814V/0184V B-46
CONTROL ROOM
",* U '* * "
gnz,yg DESIGN REVIEW
,_ s
_... J.9 POWER CO.
Control / Display Integration B
HF AREA HED CATEGORY SHEET OBSERVATION NUM8ER REFERENCE CRITERI TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1044 VCT pressure and level meters The pressure scale has been revised to P -6.9.1.1 on CP004 have similar ranges use increments of 5 (psig), so as to 3
P-(0-90 psig and 0-100 %) with differentiate this meter from the level 2
6.6.1.1.C same minimum scale increment m eter.
I (i.e. 2 units).
1 R EF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION 1
l l
l Note: Reference P) is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 l
6814V/0184V B-47 i
m_________________
HOUSTON
. CONTROL ROOM LIGHMG g gggg y gg ygg y
... POWER CO.
CATEGORY C HED DISPOSITIONS l
s.
C-1 11/23/87 6780V/0182V
_______________j
i i
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. _M POWER CO.
Workspace C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY l
SHEET j
OBSERVATION NUMBER OlSPOSITION i
OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE i
PARAGRAPH HED-1060 Air velocities in the control The HVAC design has been evaluated and S-0169 room exceed the 45 ft./ min.
the system rebalanced.. Measurements of j
P-limit and cause noticeable the air velocities are being taken to 3
6.1.5.2.b
- drafts, verify conformance to the criterion of j
P -App.D 45 ft./ min maximum. Exceptions will l
2 D.I.l.C be addressed as required.
.j l
i l
l 1
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS i
i I
l i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
1 Note: Reference P
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
6780V/0182V C-2
.i
pp HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM lGHTING DESIGN REVIEW WE.(1 POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1086 Procedures for putting on, Procedures are being provided in a S-0162 taking off and controlling format suitable for attachment to the P-protective / emergency equip-equipment. Additionally, instructions 3
6.1.4.1.1 ment were not available.
In large print (greater than 12 points)
P -App.C are being mounted on the inside of the 2
C.I.F safety equipment cabinet doors.
REF:
C ATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P i
2 s STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 6780V/0182 V C-3
houston CONTROL ROOM
}
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW.
1 i
J POWER CD.
l Workspace C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY i
OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION i
OR REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1087 The storage area and storage The storage area and the outside of the S-0164 cabinet for emergency equip-storage cabinet are being clearly and P-ment are not clearly and distinctively marked.
3 6.1.4.3.b distinctively marked.
P -APP.C 2
C.I.I l
-l i
1 i
~
l j
i i
REF:
1 CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number
'l Note: Reference i2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-4 j
I
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
..M POWER CD.
" "' 8 " "
HF AREA HED CATEGORY l
OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION NUMBER REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1084 There is no back-up power An uninterruptible power supply has P-for the HL&P four node been installed for the MCO telephone 3
6.2.1.8.a telephone exchange center switch. Additionally, a new power l
P -7.1.2 located in the MCO. This feed has been installed from the 2
(
facility is housed in what double ended 480V MCC in the switch-appears to be temporary yard. The building is being construction wooden framed repaired.
building that is reported to leak. The site has experienced a major " crash" I
of this vital communication system and consequent loss of telephone communications.
l l
l l
l REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS l
l l
i i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-5
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
.. ECI POWE R CO.
HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY C
OBSERVATION NUMBER OR D!SPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH IIED-1055 On the ESF Status Monitoring The abbreviations used on the ESF Status P -6.3.3.4 windows, abbreviations /
Monitoring windows and in CRDR Criteria 3
P -8.6.10 acronyms which are not in Report Appendix L are being reviewed.
2 Appendix L of the CRDR As appropriate, the window engravings are Criteria Report are used, as being revised and the abbreviations follows:
list is being updated.
SUPP, BU, RET, CSIV, EMERG, POS (when used for position), EXC (used for excess), CWS (when used for Chilled Water System),
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION I
I P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Note: Reference 3
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-6
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
...KI POWER CD.
s Annunciator C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION k
NUM8ER OR DISPOSITION i
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1056 Various incorrect or incon-The labels used on the ESF Status P -6.3.3.4 sistent labels are used on Monitoring windows are being' revised to g
P -8.6.10 the ESF Status Monitoring correct the incorrect and inconsistent 2
windows.
labels.
l l
}
l l
l l
l l
l REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION i
1 P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Note: Reference 12 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 l
6780V/0182V C-7
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
..M POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY -
C Annunciator SHEET OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR I
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1068 The seismic monitoring system A test has been performed to assess P -6.3.1.2 annunciator window is not audibility of the seismic monitoring 3
P -8.1 functional. Alarm on the.
panel alarm across the control room, 2
seismic monitoring panel may with result being that the alarm is not be audible across the audible. A relay in the seismic control room.
monitoring system is being added in
-l order to actuate the annunciator window.
1 I
I REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION I
Pj s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-8
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
._.._M POWE R CO.
Annunc ator C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION
(
NJMBER DISPOSITION l
OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1089 Tech Specs require that the Modifications to properly identify P -6.3.1.2 normal purge containment that the valves are not sealed closed 3
P -8.1 isolation valves (48" lines) are being developed for evaluation 2
be scaled closed during and implementation.
Modes 1-4. The valves are being sealed closed by re-moving power from the valve operators, thus removing control power as well.
" Control power not available" is used for indicating bypass / inoperable status through ERFDADS and the ESF Status Monitoring System.
Thus the ERF displays and the status monitoring windows will show that these 4 valves l
are " abnormal" during the normal anticipated mode of opera tion.
1 REF:
F,NGINEERING OBSERVATION 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-9 u-_----___--_--_______
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM '
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.... W POWE R CO.
ntrols C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH llED-1031 Legend pushbuttons on the The " REM / LOC" label has been revised P-turbine control panels for to "TURB/CR", to provide positive 3
6.4.3.3.b SGFP 11,12,13 on panel indication of the active control P -App.E CP006 do not conform to the station. The " RESET" label has been 2
App.H convention of labels. The revised to " LATCH", to be consistent
- 11. 3. 2 labels provided read with the main turbine labeling in a
" REM / LOC", where:
similar application.
REM = Control at turbine LOC = Controlin Control Room.
\\
Another pushbutton is labeled "R ESET", meaning latch and reset.
R EF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION I
Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P is STP Celteria Report number 2
6780V/0182V C-10
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM' LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. K1 POWER CO.
n HF AREA HED CATEGORY C Controls OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH l
HED-1083 The integrated communica-Modifications for the communications P -6.4.1.2 tions consoles have three consoles such that two distinct actions g
P -6.2.1.6 toggle switches that are are required for actuation of these j
2 subject to inadvertent alarms are being developed for actuation. This will result evaluation and implementation.
In the actuation of false main plant alarms as follows:
- 1. Evacuation
- 2. Fire
- 3. Reactor Containment l
Building Evacuation l
l REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6760V/0182V C-I l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
_.[_M POWER CO.
C sual Msplays HED CATEGORY HF AREA OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1015 The Emergency Operating The circuit is being revised to provide P-Procedures require a check a " system start sealed in" output. A 3
6.5.1.1.a to determine if the reactor red light is being added above the P -6.3.1.2 coolant makeup system is on, reactor coolant makeup system control 2
to provide automatic makeup switch to indicate that the " system j
to the Volume Control Tank.
start" signal has been sealed in.
l 1
Currently there is no means of indication in the Control Room that confirms the status l
of the reactor coolant makeup system.
REF:
EOP VALID ATION REPORT APPENDIX A
)
i i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number
]
i Note: Reference P
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-12
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.$_M POWER CO.'
Visual Displays C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH IIED-1018 There is intadequate feedback Revisions have been made to use the P -6.5.1.1 to show that depression of ESF Status Monitoring system-actuate
)
g P -6.3.1.2 an ESFAS signal reset push-red lights to provide the feedback.
2 6.3.1.3 button has reset the signal.
Reset of an ESFAS signal results in the l
The reset pushbuttons and red light being extinguished.
the status lights are on f
well-separated panels.
REF:
EOP VALID ATION REPORT APPENDIX A J
i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-13
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
._...E.
POWER CO.
sual Msplays C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION
^
OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH
)
HED-1025 The SG PORVs and the ECW For the discussion of QDPS revisions, P -6.5.3.1 valves controlling flow to see Disposition Note CPT-1.
3 P -App.H the essential chillers are 2
H.!
controlled by the QDPS.
Panel indications (valve open/ closed lights) are derived from the analog signal indicating valve position, which is not repeatable; the software l
setpoints of 0.5 % and 99.5 % for fully closed and l
fully open, respectively, I
are too restrictive, such that the valve position
]
lights may never indicate a fully open or closed position.
REF:
STARTUP OBSERVATION 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-14
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
]
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
\\
I im
.ECI POWER CO.
Visual Displays HED CATEGORY C
HF AREA OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSIT10N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1032 During plant startup, the A direct readout of the differential P -6.5.1.1 FW header pressure must be pressure is being provided on a Proteus 3
6.8.1.2 compared to the steam header computer display.
j P -6.3.1.2 pressure. The indicators are 2
App.F not in close proximity to F.1 each other, being on two 6.5.1.2 adjacent panels and in two sections of the panels (Section D of CP006 and l
Section B of CP007). The pressure differential for a given procedure step must be determined to be 45 psid or greater. The minimum J
scale increments are 50 psi, rendering "x psig + 45" readable for only a few values of x.
i REF:
1 OPER ATOR OBSERVATION
)
i Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-15 i
l
J HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
\\
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
,_ a
. __.. Efl POWE R CD.
8 8 8"
8 A' 8 C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY I
OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION l
OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1017 The mimic of panel CP004 The discharge and bypass valve switches P -6.6.6.4 shows the normal discharge for charging pump 1 A have been inter-g P -6.4.1.1 valves of the centrifugal changed for fidelity to the system 2
App. N charging pumps as the normal arrangement and to remain consistent N.I.2 discharge valve for one pump with the switch arrangement for pump and as the bypass valve for
- 18. Also, the check valves in the the other pump. Conversely, discharge header have been added to the j
the bypass valves are shown mimic.
as a bypass valve for one l
pump and as the normal dis-charge valve for the other pump.
REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A i
u 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 6780V/0182V C-16
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW i., &
_ M POWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1019 On panel CP005 the pressur-The switch escutcheons have been P -6.6.3.2 izer pressure Safety changed to read " UNBLOCK"-blank -
3 P -6.4.5 Injection (SI) block /
BLOCK" to provide better definition of 2
reset switch labeling is the switch function, i.e. that the left confusing. The escutcheon position removes the signal block. The reads "R ESET-blank-BLOCK" pressurizer pressure SI block and ex-(three-position switch).
cessive cooldown block switches have been changed in this fashion.
REF:
EOP VALID ATION REPORT APPENDIX A l
l l
l l
(
3 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-17 l
L
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
... E POWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids C
HF AREA
'ED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITl0N OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH IIED-1020 Labeling of power lockout Labeling of the power lockout switches P - 6.6.3.1 control switches for the has been revised to identify the g
P -6.4.5 Safety Injection (SI) specific service.
2 system requires additional information on the name-l plates in order to differentiate between the accumulator discharge isolation valves and the hot leg isolation valves.
)
REF:
l EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A i
i j
i Note: Reference Pj is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-18
. - - - a
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
,=, &
....J.CI POWE R CO.
Labels and Location Aids C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH l
llED-1021 The train A, B and C Safety The escutcheons have been revised to P -6.6.3.2 Injection block / reset push-read "R ESET".
3 P -6.4.5 buttons have confusing 2
labeling. The escutcheon reads " BLOCK /R ESET".
j
.l l
l 1
i i
l I
REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A s
1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-19
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW wm
_ E POWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY SHEET OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH i
i HED-1057 The function of the AFW pump An escutcheon has been added to indi-P -6.6.1.1 turbine trip pushbutton is cate the function of the pushbutton g
6.6.3.2 not indicated.
(i.e., " TRIP").
l P -6.4.1.1 2
6.4.5 l
l l
I I
1 l
l REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Note: Reference P} is STP Criteria Report number 3
6780V/0182V C-20 a
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW m,
...M POWE R CO.
abels and Meadon Ms C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1058 The RCS temperature re-The recorder inputs have been verified P -6.6.3.3 corders have inconsistent and the labels are being changed g
P -6.4.5 panel labels and pen labels.
accordingly, i
2 I
I REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT r
APPENDIX A i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 6780V/0182V C-21
o
' HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
\\
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
\\
l
~
.....ECI POWE R CD.
Labels and Location Aids C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION l
NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH j
HED-1077 Demarcation zone coding and Demarcation and mimic options to P -6.6.1.1 labeling are not adequate to provide visual distinction between trains g
6.6.6.2 properly identify system and of the same system and between systems 6.8.1.3 train configuration on panel are being developed for evaluation and j
P -6.4.1.2 CP022 in the area for CR/EAE implementation.
)
2 App.N HVAC.
N.I.1 6.5.1.3 l
l REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION Note: Reference Pg is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 6780V/0182V C-22
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
[.M OWER CO.
Labels and Location Aids C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY 4
OBSERVATION NUM8ER OR DISPOSITION 1
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1078 Temporary labels have been Labels are being reengraved to P -6.6.5.1 added for power source permanently add the power source.
g 6.6.3.1 identification on the lower 6.6.3.3 left hand corner of main P -6.4.5 control panel labels, to 2
correct inaccurate informa-tion or to provide missing information.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P} is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-23
/
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM 3
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW f'
I.M POWER CO.
a sa adon M s HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1080 The controller for Reactor Labels are being provided to clearly P -6.6.3.2 Coolant Purification flow indicate what the controller action is, 3
6.6.3.8 control does not indicate i.e. "OPEN" or "CLOSE" the controlled P -6.4.5 valve open/close direction.
valve.
2 1
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION i
i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number l
i P
11/23/87 l'
6780V/0182V C-24
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW i
_.K'! POWER CO.
C I
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION '
i REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH IIED-1022 QDPS display labeling errors For the discussion of QDPS revisions, P;-6.7.2.4 have been identified during see Disposition Note CPT-1. The P -App.Q the QDPS V&V process. These ERFDADS displays also are being 2
Q.4 errors also occur in ERFDADS reviewed, Iso ensure that the displays displays that were developed are modified consistently with QDPS.
based upon the QDPS displays.
l l
REF:
QDPS V&V Note: Reference P i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P I1/23/87 6780V/0182V C-25 l-
)
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW i
. ).M POWER CD.
E 8
C HF AREA HED CATEGORY l
OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITl0N.
REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE I
PARAGRAPH IIED-1023 QDPS display labeling The CRDR Criteria Report, Appendix L, P -6.7.2.4 inconsistencies with has been revised.
3 P -App.Q Appendix L of the Criteria
)
2 Q.4 Report have been identified
]
during the QDPS V&V process.
i l.j i
i l
R EF:
QDPS V&V a
4 Note: Reference Pg is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 6780V/0182V C-26
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW K! POWER CD.
C Computers HED CATEGORY HF AREA OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION
~l OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE i
PARAGRAPH HED-1024 The display on QDPS does For the discussion of QDPS revisions, d
P -6.7.2.4 not accurately reflect the see Disposition Note CPT-1. Because
]
g P ' APP.Q actual flow rates for AFW, the positive flow indications are
]
2 l
Q.4 RHR, ECW and CCW flows when datalinked to ERFDADS, appropriate the actual flow is at or changes are also being made in ERFDADS q
near zero.
to eliminate the misleading flow indication.
REF:
OPER ATOR OBSERVATION l
l Note: Reference Pj is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number
)
P is STP Criteria Report number i
2 11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-27
.a
a
-i i
i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM j
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW l
.., EA POWER CO.
l I
]
HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C
l OBSERVATION l
NUMBER OR DISPOSITION j
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE l
PARAGRAPH d
lied-1027 The QDPS and/or ERFDADS For discussion of QDPS revisions, see
{
P; -6.7.2.4 displays contain inconsis-Disposition Note CPT-1. The ERFDADS P -App.Q tencies in nomenclature and displays are being revised to correct 2
l Q.4
- labeling, the problems noted. When the operator I
action point ranges are revised, the Additionally, the operator displays are reviewed to assure that action points for six background information on the display i
variables must be available is not being overwritten.
over a different range than currently specified.
l I
1 1
REF:
ENGINEEltING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-28
HO USTON '
CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
....ECI POWER CO.
E"
- 8 C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUM8ER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION '
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1036 The various computer displays The abbreviations used on the computer P -6.7.2.4 use abbreviations that do not displays and the abbreviations listed g
P -App.Q comply with the Criteria in CRDR Criteria Report Appendix L are 2
Q.4 Report Appendix L.
being reviewed. As appropriate, the displays are being revised and the abbreviations list is being updated.
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 6780V/0182V C-29
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW d
.... Ef! POWER CD.
j C
mputers HED CATEGORY HF AREA OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH llED-1038 The plant computer displays CRTs have been adjusted and tubes have S-0825 are generally good but been replaced as required. (Display P -6.7.2.1 problems with color quality was degraded due to poor g
6.7.2.4 color quality and various CRT adjustment and " burned-in" tubes.)
6.7.2.7 display and menu discrep-The identified display discrepancies P -App.Q ancies were noted, are being resolved by ongoing programs 2
Q1 for display review and revision.
Q.4
{
Q.7 j
l l
I i
l REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference Pg is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 2 s STP Criteria Report number P
i 6780V/0182V C-30
i HOUSTON CONTROL ' ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
__. POWER CO, Computers C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY 1
OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR q
REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE i
PARAGRAPH llED-1040 The ERFDADS and Proteus An engineering review is being per-S-0854 computers use inconsistent formed to evaluate the current displays P -6.7.2.4 labeling. The use in Proteus in the computer systems, and determine 3
6.7.2.7 of a full background color how they can be improved and made more P -App.Q with black letters is good, consistent. The display criteria and 2
Q.4 but violates criteria in the the displays themselves will then be avised. The displays will be made as Q.7 choice of background color.
consistent as possible based upon the The ERFDADS use of cyan is differing machine capabilities, not quickly distinguished from the remainder of the display.
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS l
l l
l Note: Reference P} is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-31
NOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
. _M POWER CO.
- E" 8
C HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH llED-1064 Transfer switch labels and ERFDADS transfer switch position P -6.7.2.4 ERFD ADS labels are incon-descriptions are being revised to use 3
P -App.Q sistent for switch positions.
CR for control room, ASP for auxiliary 2
Q.4 Transfer switch escutcheons shutdown panel, ZLP for another local use CR for control room, ASP panel and X PNL for the transfer switch for auxiliary shutdown panel, panel. These revisions make the ZLP-xxx for another local ERFDADS descriptions as close as 1
panel and LOCAL for control possible to the transfer switch occurring at that same escutcheons, given the computer transfer switch panel.
descriptor limitations.
f ERFDADS uses only LOCAL and l' EMOTE.
R EF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION i
Note: Reference Pg is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 6780V/0182V C-32
MOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW m.,
.**0]E9 POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY l
NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1065 The identical displays in ERFDADS algorithms are being revised P-QDPS and ERFDADS may show to be consistent with QDPS. In the g
6.7.2.4.e a different value and/or interim, use of substitute values is P -App.Q quality for a calculated being administratively controlled; 2
Q.4.E parameter because the the cluster limits and referee values algorithms performing the are being chosen to minimize the calcul-%ns are not the differe' ek f.1 the information same nr. tne two systems.
displayed.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P
i i s NUREG-0700 Section C number P is STP Criteria Report number 2
6780V/0182V C-33
pp HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.MtolM POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH
\\
HED-1070 It is difficult to Colors are generally distinguishable P -6.7.2.1 distinguish between green from the intended viewing distance.
3 6.7.2.7 and yellow status boxes CRTs have been readjusted to alleviate P -App.Q on the ERFDADS displays.
distinguishability problems. A problem 2
Q.1 regarding residual magnetism in certain Q.7 panels has been identified. This resid-ual magnetism is a significant contri-butor to the color problem noted.
Panel degaussing is being performed.
The symbols are being evaluated, with the aim of differentiating the status conditions both by color and by shape.
l REF:
SPDS AUDIT Note: Reference P
i 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
2 s STP Criteria Report number P
11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-34
p HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW l
Mt0Aq POWER CO.
Computers C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1072 The SPDS CSF displays do not The SPDS Man-in-the Loop Validation P -6.7.2.7 change color based upon is being performed; evaluation of color 3
P -App.Q parameter being in alarm changes based upon alarm condition 2
Q.7 condition.
is being performed as part of this
~
validation. At the conclusion of the validation, appropriate modifications will be implemented.
(
REF:
SPDS AUDIT Note: Reference P} is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number 2 s STP Criteria Report number P
i 6780V/0182V C-35
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.E9 POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1075 AFW flow indication on The controls design for the AFW flow P -6.7.2.4 QDPS may go offscale high regulating valves is being revised, so 3
6.5.1.2 during AFW actuation. If that flow limiting to below 706 gpm P -App.Q actuated by SG low-low level, (the upper limit of the QDPS AFW flow 2
Q.4 automatic flow control may scale)is effective continuously. Thus App.F terminate while flow indica-the flow will be on-scale at all times.
F.1.3 tion is still offscale high, if low-low level signal clears.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference P
l 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 6780V/0182y C-36
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW m.,
W CT POWER CO.
Computers C
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1082 On the ERFDADS Normal Safety Modifications to ERFDADS displays are P -6.7.2.4 Function Containment display being developed for evaluation and g
6.7.2.6 (NSF-Z), the "INOP" flags for implementation.
P -App.Q containment isolation status 2
Q.4 are not driven by the proper Q.6 valves,(f.e. all valves receiving Phase A or Phase B or CVI signals).
R EF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference Pg is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P
i 2 s STP Criteria Report number 6780V/0182V C-37
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW o,. -
9#0NT POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION l
OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1094 ECW flow displays on QDPS For the discussion of QDPS revisions, P -6.7.2.4 and ERFDADS use inappropri-see Disposition Note CPT-1.
g 6.5.1.2 ate ranges: too wide on flow The ERFDADS displays are being revised P -App.Q to CCW heat exchanger, too to use appropriate flow ranges for ECW 2
Q.4 narrow on flows to essential flows.
App.F chillers.
F.1.3 REF:
STARTUP OBSERVATION I'1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
Note: Reference 2 s STP Criteria Report number i
P 11/23/87 C-38 6780V/0182V
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW
- o.,-
MON! POWER CO.
HF AREA Panel Layout HED CATEGORY C
NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1043 The arrangement of the T-avg, An ERFDADS display has been developed P; -6.8.1.1 T, T and delta-T meters to show loop comparisons of T h
c avg' P -6.5.1.1 for the reactor coolant loops T'
c, and delta-T on bar graphs.
2 h
on panel CP005, while This display facilitates quick appropriate for other needs, comparison of the same parameter is not adequate for cross-across the four RCS loops.
loop comparisons of these parameters. Presentation of these parameters on a cross-loop basis is not provided on a computer display either.
REF:
OPER ATOR OBSERVATION Note: Reference Pg is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P
i 2 s STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 6780V/0182V C-39
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING gggggy ggyjgy
. _... POWER CD.
\\
CATEGORY D HED DISPOSITIONS D-1 11/23/87 6851V/0182V
pp HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW Pl!OJE.CI POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY OBSERVATION NUMBER OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1029 Controls are above 70 inches These flow controllers are infrequently S-138 on Panel CP022 for the Fuel used and operated. Location of P -6.1.2.5 Handling Building HVAC controls above or below the 3
P -App. A exhaust air flow controllers, recommended zone is a secondary 2
A.5 concern to locating the controls on the appropriate panel. A small ladder has been provided to improve accessibility.
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P
i i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 6851V/0182V D-2
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
... W POWER CO.
HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY D
NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH IIED-1088 During three train emergency Additional noise level measurements P-mode Control Room IIVAC oper-are planned for during the first g
6.1.5.5,b ation, noise levels reach operating cycle. Eased upon those P -App.D 66 dB (A) at the entrance to measurements, the background noise 2
D. I.4 the horseshoe area of the level will be determined and the control room. Noise levels need for corrective action at other representative assessed.
locations were below the 65 dB (A) criterion, e
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P
i g s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P
i 2 s STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 6851V/0182V D-3
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.....ECT POWER CD.
Communications D
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1085 The patch panels for the Labels will be provided at each patch S-0255 maintenance communication panel to provide interconnection P -6.2.1.3 system do not have readily information.
3 6.6.1.1 available information for P -7.3 tieing in several people at 2
6.4.1.2 various locations.
REF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P
i 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 6851V/0182V D-4
f houston CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW MKT POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1092 Temporary identification Means of providing permanent identifi-P-
(colored dots) has been cation for annunciator windows actuated 3
6.3.3.3.e added to the annunciator upon ERFDADS failure or malfunction 6.6.5.1 windows actuated via ERFDADS will be developed for evaluation and to distinguish these alarms implementation.
1 in the event of ERFDADS failure or malfunction.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION Note: Reference P
i t s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 6851V/0182V D-5
pp HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW P*M.CI POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1001 After " quick release" of Training has been implemented to ensure P -6.4.1.2 7certain Microswitch switches, that operators do not " quick release" 3
P -6.2.1.6 the switch may go past the the switches. Without the " quick 2
center position and make up release," the switch does not go contacts for the opposite past the center position and cause position of the switch. The the reverse actuation. No further switches involved are three-corrective action is required.
position switches, maintained in the right or left position and spring return to center from the other position.
This accidental actuation may occur when the switch is turned to the spring return position and then released quickly.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P is STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 6851V/0182V D-6
)
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
@ECT ' POWER CO.
8 D
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REF N
CRITERI A TITLE p
h HED-1090 Color coding of J-handles on Switch handles on Panel CP010 are being P -6.4.2.2 Panel CP010 switches provid-replaced with black handles, conforming 3
P-ing feeds to ESF bus trans-to the color coding criteria for 2
6.2.1.10 formers does not conform to switches.
j App.S the color coding criteria.
5 S.4.E REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P} is NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 6851V/0182V D-7
pp HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM lGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.MJOJECI POWER CO.
Controls D
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH
\\
HED-1093 Pushbuttons for manual Pushbuttons will be re-engraved to add P -6.4.3.3 initiation of the bypass /
closed corners, distinguishing them 3
P -App.E inoperable status monitoring from indicating lights.
2 E.1.5.1 system do not meet the
" closed-corner octagon" criterion for distinguishing legend pushbuttons from indicating lights.
1 R EF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
6851V/0182V D-8
pf HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
{
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
^
.PN POWER CD.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE 1
PARAGRAPH HED-1028 The third pen on three pen Three pen recorders are being replaced P -6.5.4.1 recorders is obscured by the with recorders made by another g
P -App.I scales.
manufacturer. These new recorders 2
I.4. F clearly show all three pens.
(
REF:
EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A
{
Note: Reference P
i 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 6851V/0182V D-9
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW 990]ECI POWER CO.
HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY D
NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1076 The alternate boric acid Instrument loop scaling requirements P -6.5.1.2 flow indicator has the first will be investigated to determine an y
- 6. 5.1. 3 division at 30 GPM (log acceptable range having readability P -App.F scale). This is the minimum for the minimum Tech Spec flow.
2 F.1 required flow per Tech Specs F.2 and very hard to determine.
REF:
OPERATOR OBSERVATION i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number Note: Reference P
i i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 11/23/87 6851 V/0182V D-10
p houston CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW om,.
f8t0ACI POWER CO.
HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY D
NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1091 Color coding of SI process Use of mimic colors to differentiate P -6.6.6.4 mimic on Panel CP001 does ESF subsystems by train is being evalu-3 6.5.1.6 not conform to mimic color ated. When the evaluation is complet-P -App.N coding criteria.
ed, the criteria for use of mimic 2
N.I.2 colors will be clarified. The mimics App S in the control room will be revised S.4.G if necessary to conform to the criteria.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P
i 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P2 is STP Criteria Report number 6851V/0182V D-11
\\
p HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.f*0)K! POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1034 The titles for the Normal The ERFDADS displays will be revised to S-0825 and Critical Safety Function put the NSF/CSF letter designator in P -6.7.2.4 displays on ERFDADS would brackets after the safety function.
3 P -App.Q be enhanced if the NSF/CSF 2
Q.4.P letter designator were placed in brackets, e.g.:
Present - HEAT SINK H Better - HEAT SINK [H]
R EF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P
i i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P
i 2 s STP Criteria Report number 6851V/0182V D-12
pp houston CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW Mto)N POWER CO.
8 HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REF EN CRITERIA TITLE p
HED-1035 The ERFDADS keyboard is The possibility of differentiating P -6.7.1.4 lettered in 3 lines. It is the " shift" function line from the g
P -App.P difficult to find the correct "unshifted" function line will be 2
P.1 key since the same letter may investigated. (The top line is the appear on two of the lines.
" shift" function.) The keys may not (The " shift" function should be large enough to implement this be differentiated from the recommendation.
"unshifted" function.)
R EF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P
i 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 6851V/0182 V D-13
j HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW 9#0)ECI POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1039 Proteus displays were The criteria for use of periods on S-0853 inconsistent in the use of computer displays will be reevaluated.
P-periods at the end of After criteria changes are made as g
6.7.2.4.k sentence or listing.
needed, the computer displays will be P -App.Q (Procedure writer's guides reviewed for conformance to the 2
Q.4.K sometimes encourage not criteria and revised as required.
using complete sentences and avoiding the use of periods.)
R EF:
CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P
i 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P
i 2 s STP Criteria Report number 6851V/0182V D-14
pp HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW 990]ECT POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH H ED-1069 Colo. codings on SPDS Criteria will be revised to address P) -6.7.2.7 displays have different trend graphs. Displays will be P -App.Q meanings in different revised to specify colors used for 2
Q.7 placas (trend graphs).
trend displays.
R EF:
SPDS AUDIT Note: Reference P
i 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number P
i 2 s STP Criteria Report number 6851V/0182 V D-15
p HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW 990]E9 POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1071 The ERFDADS function keys Labeling provided on the SPDS keys is P -6.7.1.4 used for SPDS should be seen as adequate. Evaluations will be 3
P -App.P differentiated from the performed to determine possible means 2
P.1 remaining keys.
to highlight these keys as SPDS keys.
R EF:
SPDS AUDIT Note: Reference P
i i s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P2 s STP Criteria Report number 6851V/0182V D-16
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW MGM POWER CO.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1073 Displays for QDPS and ERFDADS The displays will be revised to show P;-6.7.2.7 have been developed using the the symbol for a cooler or heater, P -App.Q P&ID symbol for a cooler or without letters identifying the service 2
Q.7.H heater, but without con-or water source, in conformance to the App.L sistency in use of letters criteria developed.
identifying the service or water source.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
P is STP Criteria Report number 2
6851V/0182V D-17
pp HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW 9t!0lM POWER CD.
HF AREA HED CATEGORY NUMBER OBSERVATION OR OlSPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1074 The displayed value sequence The ERFDADS display will be revised P -6.7.2.4 for RCS pressure in ERFDADS to conform with the QDPS display, 3
P -App.Q is different from QDPS.
which is designed to group the two 2
Q.4.E sensors with the same range together.
REF:
ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P
i 1 s NUREG-0700 Section 6 number i
2 s STP Criteria Report number P
6851V/0182V D-18