ML20236V353
| ML20236V353 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 11/23/1987 |
| From: | HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236V341 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8712040248 | |
| Download: ML20236V353 (36) | |
Text
- - -
Addendum 3 GantrolERoomDesign-Review.
1 Executive Summary i
l DR ADO O
8 l
The SouthTexas Project HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY
Addendum 3 e
"wO="=im'*05 KOOM IJeSign Reviety
)
l Executive Summary
)
The SouthTexas Project HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY
houston CONTROL ROOM.
UGHTING gggggy ggyggy
_..._ POWE R CD.
EXECUTIVE SUMM ARY.
i REVISION LOG i
Revision Pages No; Date Description Affceted j
l
)
1 I
l 0
1/30/84 Initial Issue j
l I
Addendum 4/15/85 Provided Current 5-1, 2, 3 No.1 Schedule Section 5.0 Addendum 12/22/86 Addendum Describing N/A j
No.2 Results of Activities Between 4/15/85 and 12/22/86 i
Addendum 11/23/87 Addendum Describing N/A No.3 Results of Activities Between 12/22/86 and 11/23/87 I
l I
i i
11/23/87 6987V/0187V
, i f
HOUSTON CONTROL' ROOAf 4
LIGHTING gggggy ggyggy
]
POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS' l
l Section Title Page REVISION LOG i'
TABLE OF CONTENTS 11 ~
LET OF TABLES 111 LIST OF FIGURES fv l
SUMMARY
Y PREFACE vi
)
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1-1 j
i i
2.0 M_ETHODOLOGY AND RESULTS 2-1 l
2.1 METHODOLOGY 2-3 2.2 R ESULTS 2-2 5.0 SCHEDULE 5-1 I
i i
s il 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.._ E POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS LET OF TABLES Table No.
Title Page 2-1 SUMM ARY OF RESULTS 2-4 2-2 NEW HED's 2-5 2-3 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS - WORKSPACE 2-6 2-4 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS - COMPUTERS 2-7 2-5 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS - VEUAL DEPLAYS 2-8 1
2-6 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS - CONTROL-DISPLAY 2-9 INTEGRATION 2-7 PREVIOUSLY CATEGORIZED DEFERRED ITEMS -
2-10 l
l VEUAL DEPLAYS 1
l i
1 l
111 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
1 1
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW i
)
. _..._ POWE R CO.
i EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS i.
1 LIST OF FIGURES j
l Figure No.
Title l
P-1 STP CRDR MAJOR REPORTS 2-1 R EFERENCE/ COMMENT FORM 2-2 HEO FORM 2-3 HED ASSESSMENT FACTOR CRITERIA IV i1/23/87 6987V/0187Y
-.___--._n___.-a
f.
l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l
LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
.. __E POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 3 SUMM ARY This addendum summarizes the results of the South Texas Project (STP) Control Room Design Review (CRDR) activities since issuance of Addendum 2 (dated December 22, 1986) to the Executive Summary.
The activities during this time period have been the following:
l A.
Partial completion of evaluations against the Category E deferred criteria in the categories of workspace and communications.
B.
Miscellaneous CRDR human factors work.
This addendum summarizes the methodology and results of these efforts and provides an updated schedule for completion of the remaining STP CRDR activities.
As this report is an addendum to the Executive Summary, section numbers of this addendum correspond generally to the section numbers used in the Executive Summary.
This addendum also uses the same format as Addenda 1 and 2.
l t
v 11/23/87 6987V/0187V 1
L______________________________
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l
LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.. _._... POWE R C O.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 3 l
PREFACE 1
The control room design review (CRDR) of the Soutis Texas Project (STP) Electric Generating Station was started in September 1982. This review was performed by Torrey I
Pines Technology for Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P) with Bechtel Energy Corporation (Bechtcl) acting as agent.
The program plan was presented to the NRC at the STP mock-up in October 1982. The I
basic review work for operator experience review, system function and task analysis and i
control room survey was completed in October 1982. In November 1982 the management j
team put a hold on CRDR activities, and authorized a design study to correct mounting evolutionary engineering changes and discrepancies with the NUREG-0700 guidelines.
In November 1982, a decision was made by HL&P to completely relayout six panels and upgrade the four remaining main control room panels based on the design study. This i
redesign effort was required to accommodate design changes resulting from plant design evolution and Regulatory Guide 1.97 requirements and to correct discrepancies with NUREG-0700. In December 1982 the management team selected one of five alternatives studied for design implementation.
i The mock-up was revised considering the 441 identified HEDs and evolutionary engineering changes. As the Bechtel layout engineers advanced the layouts of the 10 panels, Torrey Pines Technology engineers reviewed the rework for correction of known discrepancies and compliance with good human factors principles. The redesign effort on the main control panels was completed in April 1983. The NRC performed an in-progress audit in May 1983, after which the panel vendor was provided with firm layout drawings.
l vi 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.. _.E POWER CO.
The NRC audit comments required the addition of several special studies to those already in progress, e.g., demarcation and hierarchical labeling. The most significant addition was the evaluation of specified parameters which resulted in a net reduction of 51 panel m eters. The extensive relayout required a repeat of the System Function and Task Analysis with verification and walk-through/ talk-through validation. Likewise a specially structured control room review and human factors review of the corrective measures for all Category "A" and representative Category "B" discrepancies were performed. The demarcation and hierarchical labeling studies resulted in continued upgrading of the nock-up. The completion of the panel relayout allowed the design of the annunciator system consistent with the relocations of many systems and subsystems, and a reduction of active windows from 1055 to 642.
Following the completion of these major efforts, liL&P has continued the CRDR program, including resolution of human engineering deficiencies identified, using Bechtel and Torry Pines Technology as required.
The documentation for this program was necessarily extensive in view of its design development nature. Documentation describing the work performed during the CRDR is summarized below and in Figure P-1:
1.
Program Plan - Defines the plan for performing the CRDR.
2.
Criteria Report - Provides the detailed guidelines and basis for the CRDR and describes the interface between the control room and plant systems.
This report also includes review procedures, plant conventions and liuman Factors data developed during the CRDR that will facilitate future control room modifications.
vii 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
l 4
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM i
LIGHTING gggggy ggyjgy POWE R CO.
3.
Operating Experience Review (OER) Report - Describes the operations personnel review process, results, conclusions and recommendations of l
)
this task defined in the Program Plan, l
4.
System Function and Task Analysis (SFTA)' Report - Describes the methodology, results, conclusions and recommendations for this SFTA effort defined in the Program Plan.
1 l
5.
Control Room Survey (CRS) Report - Describes the review process,
]
results, conclusions and recommendations of this task defined in the Program Plan. This report also includes the final results and dispositions for the human factors observations obtained from the OER and the SFTA..
6.
Annunciator Report - Describes the review process, results, conclusions and recommendations of the annunciator review task defined in the Program Plan, and the annunciator study guide.
]
j 7.
Special Studies Report - Describes details of miscellaneous studies performed as part of the CRDR. This includes the anthroporhetric study, l
the hierarchical labeling study, the demarcation study, evaluation of l
specified parameters and many minor studies to resolve NRC audit comments.
8.
Implementation Plan Report - Summarizes the control panel design changes resulting from the implementation of Reg. Guide 1.97 l
requirements, engineering design requirements and preliminary observations of the CRDR design review team. It describes the reasons for major changes to the control panel layouts.
l s
vill 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
_._3 POWER CO.
9.
SFTA Validation Report - Summarizes the second review required because of the extensive revisions made to the control panel layouts and also includes walk-through/ talk-through exercises performed in the mock-up area.
10.
OER Validation Report - Summarizes the review made by operators to determine if the redesigned panels corrected reported operator concerns and evaluata if any new problems were created as a result of the corrective measures taken.
11.
CRS Validation Report - Summarizes the review made to determine if the i
Category A and representative samples of the Category B HEDs were l
satisfactorily corrected and if any new problems were created.
l l
12.
Executive Summary - Summarizes the CRDR results, conclusions, recommendations and schedules for remaining work. Technical details are in the Operating Experience Review Report, the System Function and Task Analysis Report, the Annunciator Report, the Control Room Survey Report, the Special Studies Report, the implementation Plan Report and various validation reports.
13.
Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report - Summarizes all Category A, B, C and D HED resolutions.
14.
Executive Summary Addenda - Summarize the results and remaining work schedules of the CRDR program following the submittal of the Executive Summary Report. Addendum I showed progress as of April 15, 1985.
Addendum 2 showed progress as of December 22, 1986. Addendum 3 shows progress as of November 23,1987, ix 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
I HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING gggggy ggyjgy
.... _..._ POWE R C D.
15.
Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) Validation Report - Summarizes 1
the validation process used for the Emergency Operating Procedures and the results as they involve the control panels. This validation was conducted on the STP simulator during May 1986 using the draft EOPs.
16.
Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report Addenda - Summarize all Category A, B, C and D HED resolutions for HEDs identified after January 1, 1986. Addendum I summarized the HED resolutions as of -
December 22, 1986. Addendum 2 summarizes the HED resolutions as of -
November 23,1987 and supersedes Addendum I in its entirety.
4 i
X l
11/23/87 6987V/0187V
_ _ _o
q HOUSTON
' CONTROL ROOM
' lGHTING '
. DESIGN REVIEW.
)
U$$IE7d POWER CD.
z!
PLANNING.
g I
i l
6 1
I
/Zf
! l REVIEW &
e
{
h h
{
gg
]
DESIGN SUPPORT gs Dj ui j
t (E5 5
gw[E l{
ca l
Eg j
gr g
a q
~
~
/_/_
j l
/
g E
h Eh N
f I
h h5 l
ASSESSMENT w
!! hl5 5
E
>! gi E
E l EU IMPLEMENTATION l If E~l l i
v
_,_z STP CRDR MAJOR REPORTS Figure P 1 I
I 1
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW l
)
POWE R CO.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This addendum reports the results of activities performed towards the completion of the -
CRDR of the South Texas Project since the Executive Summary, Addendum 2, dated 12/22/86.
Since December 1986, construction has been completed on the following:
f I
Control Room Carpeting Control Room Lighting Balancing of Control Room HVAC System Communications System Completion of the above construction items enabled additional CRDR evaluations to be completed against Category E deferred criteria in the categories of workpace and communications. Evaluation of the control room against the Category E deferred generic guidelines took place during the periods of January 8 and 9,1987 and June 15-17,1987 and proceeded using the criteria listed in the Control Room Survey Report, Volume IV. These criteria are summarized in the Executive Summary, Section 3.2, item 16.
Other CRDR activities, i.e. those listed in the Executive Summary Addenda', Section 5, and. evaluation of observations made by STP personnel, were also performed during the time since December 22, 1986. The methodology used for Category E evaluations and miscellaneous activities is described in Section 2.
The schedule for remaining CRDR activities is provided in Section 5.
1-1 11/23/87 6987V/0187V L___--_____
t I
l
\\
HOUSTON CONTROL -ROOM l
l LtGHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW l
POWE R CO.
2.0 METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS 9
I 2.1 METHODOLOGY The methodology used for the Category E evaluations and other miscellaneous CRDR
)
aetivities varied from that used prior to January 1,1986, since the ' tasks involved l
evaluations deferred from earlier phases in the CRDR and verification of appropriate resolution of previous HEDs.
1 i
The " planned activities" remaining from January 1986 (identified in Section 5, Items 1 through 17) may be categorized as follows:
A.
Activities required by HEDs previously identified, i
B.
Activities previously documented as HEDs, but deferred and called Category E.
C.
Activities deferred or identified by other means.
To proceed with these CRDR activities in an orderly fashion, each activity or HED was tabulated separately and a reference / comment form provided for it. This form is shown as Figure 2-1.
During the review process, each activity or HED reference / comment form was annotated by human factors consultants regarding compliance, using one of the following:
o N/A - Not applicable.
o YES -In compliance.
o NO - Not in compliance.
2-1 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gggggy ggyjgy POWE R CO.
If the item was identified as not in compliance, a Human Engineering Observation (HEO) form was filled out for disposition of the observation. (The HEO form is shown as Figure 2-2.)
In some instances, the item was again deferred, since it could not be evaluated due to the current control room status. In this case, no compliance status was indicated; the item identification and the reference / comment form were retained for later evaluation.
q I
i Some additional observations were generated via operator comments or by Engineering Personnel. These observations were also documented on HEO forms.
i
(
The HEOs generated were then submitted for project assessment in the same manner as during the previous CRDR phases.
2.2 R ESULTS j
l l
The results of the 1987 evaluations of the " planned activities"(Section 5, Items 1 through 17), are summarized in Table 2-1. Of the 117 outstanding items, 67 have been resolved i
and meet criteria, 36 have been deferred and 14 have been identified as HEDs, not in compliance with criteria. In additfor, a total of 29 HEDs have been identified through j
1 operator or engineering observations or other means.
Table 2-2 shows the categorization of these HEDs, which are shown in more detail in the CRDR HED Resolution Report, Addendum 2.
I While a majority of the Category E items could be evaluated at this time, some were again deferred. The deferred Category E items are shown in Table 2-3 (workspace), Table 2-4 (computers), Table 2-5 (visual displays) and Table 2-6 (control-display integration). In addition, there are 9 deferred items in visual display criteria which were previously I
categorized and therefore not included as Category E items (Refer to Table 2-7).
2-2 11/23/87 6987V/0187V l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW i
,_,._E POWE R CD.
l i
Because the STPEGS has loaded fuel in Unit 1, and for clarity in the assessment factors, j
Figure 2-3 presents the revised assessment factor criteria and implementation commitments.
The schedule for the remaining work is addressed in Section 5.
-l l
1 l
l l
l 2-3 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
l l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING gggggy ggyggy j
....... POWE R C O.
TABLE 2-1 I
SUMM ARY OF RESUL'IS PLANNED ACTIVITY EVALUATIONS (Items 1 through 17, Section 5)
ORIGINAL NUMBER OF NUMBER NUMBER q
ACTIVITY NUMBER CRITERIA OF HEDs OFITEMS OF ITEMS MET REPORTED DEFERRED (Sheets)
(Tables 2-3 thru2-7) 1 HEDs tc be Resolved 9
0 0
9 l
Criteria to be Evaluated (Category E)
\\
Workspace 34 20 10 4
Communications 48 47 1
0 Computers 3
0 1
2 Visual Displays 8
0 0
8 Control-Display Integration 13 0
0 13 Other Evaluation Items 2(l) 0 2
0 TOTAL 117 67 14 36 1.
During the communications reviews, two HEDs were identified against NUREG-0700 criteria,i.e. HED-1083 and HED-1084 (see HED Resolution Report Addendum 2).
2-4 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
e l
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.. _ ___..... P OW E R C O.
TABLE 2-2 NEW HEDs CATEGORY l
ACTIVITY A
B C-D
-TOTAL j
Planned Activity Evaluations l
Workspace 0
7 3
0 10(2) 2)
f II)
Communications 0
0 I
1-2 II)
Controls 0
0 I
0 1
b.
Computers 0
1 0
0 1
HEDs Identified by Operators / Engineering /Others 1
5 12 11 29 TOTAL 1
13 17 12 43 1.
Item is a new HED written against NUREG-0700 criteria, shown in Table 2-1 as "Other Evaluation Items".
2.
Four of these sheets are combined into one HED (HED-1063) in the HED Resolution Report, Addendum 2.
i 2-5 l
11/23/87 l
6987V/0187V 1
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
_.. E POWER CD.
TABLE 2 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS I
HF AREA: WORKSPACE STP SHEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REMARKS Emergency Equipment Appendix 0165 Deferred until storage area C.I.H is reviewed.
(
Environment /
Appendix 0166 Deferred until plant is 1
Ventilation D.I.1 operating.
Expendables 6.1.1.5 0105 Deferred until arrangement of storage area is finalized.
Emergency Equipment Appendix 0158 Deferred until storage area C.I.B is finalized.
)
i l
4 4
2-6 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
i-2 HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG gggggy ggyggy
..-._ POWE R CO.
TABLE 2-4 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS HF AREA: COMPUTERS STP SHEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REMARKS ERFDADS -
Appendix 0 0822 Deferred until completion Speed and Accuracy of SPDS Man-in-the Loop validation and resolution i
of ERFDADS HEDs.
]
i Plant Compt)tpr -
Appendix P, 0824 Deferred pending further
)
Access Aids \\l' P.4 review of documents required versus those provided in control room 3
now.
1.
This item had been previously listed in the workspace area. It is properly listed in the computers area.
2-7 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
i l
houston CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.... _._... POWE R C D.
)
TABLE 2-5 l
l DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS HF AREA: VEUAL DEPLAYS I
1 STP SHEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REM AR KS Visual Displays I.3 0296 Deferred until arrangement 0307 of storage area for 0318 expendables is finalized.
0375 0488 0685 0770 f
0793 1
i i
2-8 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM 1.tGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWE R CD.
TABLE 2-6 i
DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS HF AREA: CONTROL-DISPLAY INTEGR ATION STP SIIEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REMARKS 6.6.3.2. A 0425 Deferred until operators Contrp,1[ Display Ratiou 0326 have operating experience 0502 with the controls.
0072 0049 0509
)
0087 l
0403 0387 0397 I
Control / Display 6.6.3.2.B 0050 Deferred until operators Ratiol 0073 have operating experience i
0327 with the displays.
t 1.
These items had been previously listed in the computers area. They are properly listed in the control-display integration area.
l i
2-9 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
1 HOUSTON OONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
..._.5 POWE R CO.
TABLE 2-7 PREVIOUSLY CATEGORIZED DEFERRED ITEMS HF AREA: VEUAL DEPLAYS STP SHEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REMARKS 1
Visual Displays -
Appendix F 0331 Deferred for Scale Marking 0362 evaluation during first 0477 operating cycle.
0652 0721 0745 0761 0784 0673 2-10 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
1 HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM lGHTING g gggg y gg ygg y
{
POWER CD.
FIGURE 2-1 l
DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REV!EW CONTROL ROOM SURVEY REFERENCE / COMMENT FORM DestRVER:
DATE:
FAGE DF LOCATION:
GUIDELINE CRITERIA ITEM NO.:
HIO REFERENCE NO.t l
f C0HPLIANCE II/A YES NO ittAU'00. C00s'i.0.
suoraat' atriatact/co=<"'
DIAGRAM /FM010 40a DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW CONTROL ROOM SURVEY REFERENCE / COMMENT FORM
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CD.
l FIGURE 2-2 l
200TH TEXAS PROJECT HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION A$$ESSMENT HED NO REV TITLE TECHNICAL REVIEW REF ITEM CONCUR ORIEINATOR CONCUR WITH C0f91ENT5 REEVALUATE AND RESUSNIT FOR THE FOLLOWING REA$0h MTE C0891ENT / REASON:
HE0 DESCRIPT!0M
(
CHAIRMAN DATE MANAGEMENT REVIEW CONCUR CONCUR WITH C0894ENTS R AW MD REsm!T FOR DE F0a0 WING RN POTENTIAL OPERATOR ERROR COP 9fENT / REASON:
RECO*99ENDEO REV!$10N CHAIRMAN DATE
' REC 0999 ENDED IMPLEMENTATION PRIOR TO FUEL LDAD PRIOR TO OR AT NEXT REFUELING AT EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY AT EARLIEST CONVENIENT DUTAGE NON. MANDATORY l
OTHER HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION ASSESSMENT FORM
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM lGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.._-.. POWE R CO.
FIGURE 2-3 HED ASSESSMENT FACTOR CRITERIA ASSESSMENT IMPLEMENTATION CATEGORY FACTOR (RATING)
A SAFETY MANDATORY IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION CONSEQUENCES 3
PLANT AT EARLIEST AVAILABILITY OPPORTUNITY ENHANCEMENT (HIGH PRIORITY)
C EQUIPMENT /
CONVENIENT PLANT REFUELING RELIABILITY OUTAGE (NOT TO EXCEED 2 YRS)
ENHANCEMENT (ROUTINE)
]
MINOR OPTIONAL
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
__.. POWER CD.
5.0 SCHEDULE This section lists the activities planned for completion as part of this CRDR. HL&P will submit an executive summary report addendum approximately three months prior to Unit 2 fuelload.
Items 1 through 17 are those initially listed in Section 5 of Addendum 1 and updated in Addendum 2.
For clarity, no items have been deleted from the list. As items become resolved, the resolution will be shown rather than the schedule for completion. Items have been added as required to reflect additional planned activities.
Planned Activity Resolution / Completion Timeframe k
1.
Check visibility of green Completed 12-86.
rototellite indicating lights Meets criteria.
(Category A HEDs S-367,484, Refer to HED Resolution Report, 679,725, and 748)
Addendum 2.
2.
Correct poor readability of Completed 04-85.
bypass inoperable status Meets criteria.
lights (Category A HEDs S-726, Refer to HED Resolution Report, 732,749, and 767)
Page A-5.
3.
Completion of meter zone coding Completed 12-86.
(Category B HEDs S-006,288, Meets criteria.
676,299,310,764,787,480, Refer to HED Resolution Report, 364, 060, 912, 961, 998)
Addendum 2.
4.
Random sample label checkout to Completed 12-86.
verify readability Meets criteria.
5-1 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
.._-... POWE R C D.
Planned Activity Resolution / Completion 'T'imeframe 5.
Review of QDPS plasma displays Completed 12-86.
as replacement for panel meters Meets criteria.
6.
Check effectiveness of annunciator Completed 12-86.
horns (Category A HED S-510)
Meets criteria.
Refer to HED Resolution Report, Addendum 2.
7.
Random sample annunciator tile Completed 12-86.
{
l checkout to verify readability Meets criteria.
1 I
8.
Random sample review of Completed 12-86.
demarcation painting Resulted in new HED.
Refer to HED Resolution Report, Addendum 2, HED-1045.
l 9.
Implementation of use of lever Completed 12-86.
handles for " select" functions Meets intent of criteria.
l l
and review to confirm correction Refer to HED Resolution l
of swit.ch position readability Report, Addendum 2.
(Category B HEDs S-711, 734, 695, 705,699 and 459) 10.
Review corrective action to Completed 04-85.
address live zero indication Refer to lied Resolution (Category B HEDs S-715,665,738, Report, page B-14.
646, 754, 777, 469, 356, 332, 328, 891,941, and 977) 5-2 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING gggggy ggyjgy l
...__... POWE R C O.
Planned Activity Resolution / Completion Timeframe 1
11.
Complete corrective action to Partial completion 12-86.
j replace meter scales and random See Table 2-7 for remaining open sample checkout to verify items; review prior to commercial l
readability (Category B HEDs operation (March 1988).
S-870, 879, 881, 870, 874, 883, Refer to HED Resolution Report, 799, 803, 807, 892, 716, 666, Addendum 2.
l 739,776,470,877,880,882, q
872, 873, 884, 800, 804, 808, 718, 668, 741, 757, 778, 471, 404, 406, 719, 670, 742, 649, j
759,781,475,359,334,329, 671, 743, 650, 782, 360, 392, 720, 672, 744, 651, 760, 783, 476, 361, 721, 673, 745, 652, 761, 784, 477, 362, 331, 871 and 885).
12.
Random sample legend light Completed 12-86.
engraving checkout to verify Meets criteria, j
readability l
13.
Complete corrective action After completion of recorder chart on recorder chart paper paper replacement, in conjunction (Category B HEDs S-376 and 771) with Table 2-5 items, prior to and random sample checkout to commercial operation (March 1988).
verify readability and Refer to HED Resolution Report, accessibility of supplies.
Page D-21, 5-3 11/23/87 6987V/0187Y
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHMG DESIGN REVIEW
..__.E POWE R CD, Planned Activity Resolution / Completion Timeframe 14.
Implementation of corrective Painting pointers leads to instrument action to paint all meter inaccuracies. Meters without red pointers red and random sample pointers are to be replaced by the checkout (Category B HEDs S-724, end of the first refueling outage.
675,747,655,763,786,479, Refer to HED Resolution Report, 408,911,960, and 997)
Addendum 2.
15.
Operator review of status light Completed 12-86.
Interpretation on SGFP Turbine Meets criteria.
Control Panel 16.
Completion of Category E Criteria Complete prior to end of first reviews:
refueling outage.
A.
Workspace criteria Partial completion 12-86, 01-87 and including:
06-87. See Table 2-3 for remaining open items. Preliminary lighting o
Furniture and equipment studies were performed during layout January,1987.
o Document organization Resulted in new HEDs.
and storage Refer to HED Resolution Report, o
Spare parts, operating Addendum 2, HED-1029,1030,1060, expendables and tools 1061,1062,1063,1086 and 1087.
o Nonessential personnel access o
Reference material placement o
Desk dimensions 5-4 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
_ __. POWER CO.
Planned Activity Resolution / Completion Timeframe o'
Chair dimensions o
Emergency equipment o
Ventilation o
illumination o
Auditory o
Ambience and comfort Workspace criteria reviews for the sit-down consoles and work stations and for the vertical panels Random sample check of accessibility to controls and potential for inadvertent actuation B.
Communications criteria Completed 06-87.
Including:
Resulted in new HEDs.
Refer to IIED Resolution o
Information exchange Report, Addendum 2, fled-1083, o
Convenience of use 1084 and 1085.
o Reliability o
Interference o
Allocation of functions
~
o Voice communication links o
Conventional powered telephone system o
Sound powered telephone system 5-5 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
i i
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW 1
- _E POWER CO.
i Planned Activity Resolution / Completion Timeframe l
o Radio transceivers j
o Walkie-talkie radio transceivers o
Fixed-base UHF i
1 transceivers o
Announcing system o
Background noise o
Emergency face masks C.
Annunciation criteria for:
Completed 12-86.
Meets criteria.
o Auxiliary shutdown panel o
Computer display /
annunciation / printer features D.
Controls criteria for Completed 12-86.
compatibility with Meets criteria.
emergency gear E.
Visual display criteria Partial completion 12-86.
for:
See Table 2-5 for remaining open items, o
Meters o
Ambient light sources /
light intensity o
Interchanging of indicator lenses o
Expendable materials 5-6 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM.
LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW l
POWE R CO.
Planned Activity R,esolution/ Completion Timeframe F.
Labels criteria Completed 12-86.
Meets criteria.
j G.
Computer criteria for:
Partial completion 12-86.
I See Table 2-4 for remaining l
o Plant computer open items.
)
l o
ERFDADS, including Resulted in new HEDs.
SPDS Refer to HED Resolution Report,
)
o QDPS Addendum 2, HED-1033,1034,1037,.
1038,1039,1040,1041 and 1042.
H.
Control-display integration Partial completion 12-86.
criteria See Table 2-6 for remaining open
{
ltems.
I 17.
EOP Validation Completed 05-86.
(including confirmation of Refer to EOP Validation instrumentation and control Report.
l functions) 18.
Label reviews for accuracy Ongoing. Reviews prior to and adequacy commercial operation (March 1988).
j Implementation prior to end of first refueling outage, i
19.
Computer display reviews Reviews prior to end of first l
refueling outage. Revisions prior to end of second refueling outage, with exception of QDPS (revisions I
prior to end of third refueling outage).
5-7 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
._.. E POWER CO.
Planned Activity Resolution / Completion Timeframe 20.
Implementation of implementation prior to commercial Category A HED resolutions operation (March 1988). (Note that (excluding QDPS) this date applies only to HED-1095, which was identified after fuelload; the remaining Category A HED j
resolutions were implemented prior to fuelload. Interim corrective actions have occurred to address HED-1095; permanent corrective l
actions include QDPS modifications).
21.
Implementation of Category B Implementation prior to commercial HED resolutions (excluding operation (March 1988).
QDPS) 22.
QDPS HED resolutions Implementation prior to end of first refueling outage. Exceptions are resolutions for HED-1022 and 1041, for which implementation is prior to end of third refueling outage.
23.
Implementation of Category C Implementation integrated into HED resolutions plant modification schedule, with implementation targeted for prior to end of second refueling outage.
24.
Implementation of Category D Implementation integrated into plant HED resolutions modification schedule based upon priority.
5-8 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING
. DESIGN REVIEW.
POWER CD.
Planned Activity Resolution / Completion Timeframe l
25.
Unit 2 specific evaluations Complete prior to commercial operation for Unit 2 (1989).
)
i 5-9 11/23/87 6987V/0187V
_ _ _ _ _ _ -