ML20236K848

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
FOIA Request for Documents Containing Info on Results of Demonstration of Exam Techniques of VSC-24 Lid Welds,Which Began in April 1998,at Palisades NPP
ML20236K848
Person / Time
Site: Palisades, 07201007  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/27/1998
From: Dums D
CITIZENS' UTILITY BOARD
To: Racquel Powell
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
Shared Package
ML20236K829 List:
References
FOIA-98-188 NUDOCS 9807100105
Download: ML20236K848 (20)


Text

- - . - - .- - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-__ -_______ _ ___ _ _______ _ _______________-_

,a I

i T, " CITIZENS' UTILITY BOARD L

= 16 N. Carroll St., Suite 300 Madison, WI 53703 = (608) 251-3322 FAX (608) 251-7609 +

~

l

@q l

April 27,1998 QE30$10C 98-/88 m.

DdpRdk .5r-N-- f# _ _

Mr. Russell Powell Adm@ . AW:

FOIA/ Privacy Act Officer Rehbed0scs __

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 -

Re: Freedom ofInformation Act Request

Dear Mr. Powell:

Pursuant to the Freedom ofInformation Act,5 U.S.C. 522, as amended and 10 C.F.R. Part 9.41, the Wisconsin Citizens' Utilhy Board (CUB) requests the following documents:

1. Please provide any and all documents that contain information on the results of the demonstration of examination techniques of VSC-24 lid welds, which began in April,1998, at Palisades nuclear plant.

For purposes of this request, please consider " documents" to include reports, studies, test results, correspondence, memoranda, meeting notes, meeting minutes, working papers, graphs, charts, diagrams, notes and summaries of conversations and interviews, computer records, electronic mail and any other form of written communications including internal NRC memoranda.

Pursuant to and in compliance with 10 C.F.R. 9.41 of the agency's regulations and 5 U.S.C. 552 governing requests for waiver of fees, CUB puts forth the following information.

CUB was incorporated pursuant to Chapter 181,1979, of the Wisconsin Statutues. CUB is exempt from Federal income tax under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. CUB is also exempt from Wisconsin franchise tax.

The restricted fund (public interest fund)is exempt from Federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is also exempt from Wisconsin income taxes.

. The public interest fund was established on February 1,1981, and reorganized on April 28,1986 .

{ to correspond to the new stmeture of the CUB. The fund engages in charitable, scientific, literary and educational activities on behalf of CUB.

~

9807100105 980630 PDR FOIA a +@ .E9-DUMS98-188 PDR

~t n o o r vu w > --

CUB has 26,000 members who are residential ratepayers in Wisconsin. CUB represents the more than two million residential ratepayers in the state. CUB's purpose continues to be the statutory purpose set forth under sec.199.02, Wis. Stats.: -

' ~

....to promote the health, welfare and prosperity of all the citizens ,

of this state by ensuring effective and democratic representation of -

individual farmers and other individual residential utility consumers ,

before regulatory agencies, the legislature and other public bodies and by providing for consumer education on utility service costs and on benefits and methods of energy conservation.

CUB seeks the requested information to become informed of the results of the demonstration of examination techniques of VSC-24 lid welds at the Palisades nuclear plant.

The examination techniques were being tested to determine their usefulness in identifying the -

acceptability of VSC-24 lid welds. Demonstration of examination techniques of VSC-24 lid welds were also conducted at the Arkansas Nuclear One plant during March,1998. The results .

of those tests are the subject of FOIA/PA 98-164. A Wisconsin utility's plans for loading VSC-24 casks with high level radioactive waste will be affected by the results of the demonstrations.

CUB intends to use the information to assist it in its participation in any proceedings before Wisconsin regulatory agencies, and as part of CUB's ongoing effort to educate the public on nuclear energy issues in Wisconsin.

The information sought, is not, to the best of our knowledge, in the public domain. The general public in Wisconsin has displayed great interest in nuclear energy issues and have a direct interest in information regarding the operational performance of the VSC-24 cask. A Wisconsin utility currently uses the VSC-24 cask to store spent nuclear fuel near the shore of Lake Michigan.

CUB has. demonstrated its ability and commitment to inform the public on all important nuclear energy issues in Wisconsin. CUB provides this information free of charge through newsletters, educational pamphlets, and correspondence to its members, other residential ratepayers, legislators, and policy makers, and has neither a commercial nor a private interest in the agency records sought.

Under the amended fee waiver standard, CUB is clearly entitled to a full waiver of all search, review and duplication fees. This standard calls for such a waiver, "if disclosure of the information is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to the public' understanding of the operation or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester." 5. U.S.C. 552(IX4XAXiii).

In light of the foregoing, CUB meets this standard on its face. CUB has no commercial ,

interest in this matter, but rather seeks this information to help the general public and state regulatory agencies better understand the role of the federal government in regulating the nuclear power industry. .

2 O___________________-__-_-_-

For the reasons cited above, CUB's request falls squarely within the Congressional intent in enacting the Freedom ofInformation Act and the fee waiver provision. CUB, therefore, asks that the NRC grant a full fee waiver for this FOIA request.- -

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. If you have any questions in regards to this' ,

request, please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience. Please contact me before -

acquiring and sending the requested information if the fee waiver is not applied.

  • Sincerely, Dennis Dums

~

Research Director . .

4 l

  • I l

l t

3

Allen How 4/M JJ l From:

To: WNP1.JO ,WNP1.GMTfM/ CW l Date: 4/27/981:08pm

Subject:

Update on the VSC-24 weld issues The following is in response to your request for the status on the VSC-24 weld issues.

j Update on the VSC-24 weld issues:

Last week, the VSC-24 Owners Group (Sierra Nuclear Corporation, Pt. Beach, Palisades, &

ANO) successfully demonstrated a technique to ultrasonically examine the VSC 24 structural-lid closure wold using time-of flight technology during an NRC inspection at Palisades. This was a major milestone in the process for resumption of fuelloading. Other milestones foi the VSC 24 Owners Group and the Individuallicensees include training and qualification of personnel to perform the examinations, closure of the remaining RAls, and completion of site specific safety evaluations, procedure changes, and training.

NRC remaining milestones include issuance of the inspection report for ultrasonic examination, review and issue documentation to close the Sierra Nuclear Coporation CAL issues related to fuel loading, and site specific inspections to verify implementation of corrective actions and commitments. The target for completion of items and resumption of fuelloading is June / July 1998.

l CC: TWD2.TWP8.WFK, CJH, SFS, TJK1 l

I l

l 1

50 .~

m-m ~

i Mall Envelope Info: (3544BB72.A46 : 17 : 42080)

Subject:

Update on the VSC-24 weld issues Creation Date: 4/27/981:08pm From: Alien Howe Created By: WND1.WNP7:AGH1 l

Recipients Action Date & Vime l Post Office TWD2.TWP8 i WFK CC Post Office WND1.WNP1 GMT (Glenn Tracy) l JOT (John Thoma)

Post Office WND1.WNP7 CJH CC (Charles Haughney)

SFS CC (Susan Shankman)

TJK1 CC (Timothy Kobetz)

Domain. Post Office Delivered Route l TWD2.TWP8 Pending TWD2.TWP8 WND1.WNP1 Pending WND1.WNP1 WND1.WNP7 Pending WND1.WNP7 Files Stre Date & Time MESSAGE 1124 04/27/98 01:08pm View 4109 04/27/98 09:08am 4

Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: No Priority: Normal ,

Reply Requested: No Return Notification:: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Normal '

To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: AllInfonnation 1

l

i <

l 3

l i TALKING POINTS FOR WFK MEETING April 27,1998 i UT INSPECTION 1

  • Inspection at Palisades l

UT successfully demonstrated during " dry run' in both MTC and VCC

  • Owners group guidance document submitted 5/1/98 EPRI will administer qualification program FUTURE ACTIONS FOR FUEL LOADING lssue UT Inspection Report (May 29,1998) 4 Owners Group submit list of future milestones (May 1,1998) i Owners Group respond to remaining outstanding RAls (tentatively, May 22,1998)

Weld Team prepare SNC CAL Closeout (mid June 1998)

CAL closeout inspection at Point Beach (mid June 1998)

Owners Group schedule to inspect loaded casks POTENTIAL OBSTACLES I

  • Owners Group submittals for el *Jre of SNC CAL Resources for SNC CAL closeout and utility CAL closeout inspection 4

Weld team agreement on technical issues invoMng allowable flaw size calculation N

12 -

~'

l .

i 4  :

4 4

9 l

i I

t 1

I 8

I

\

\

\

7

)

i

\ e

(

\

s

e

?

I From: Timothy Kobetzj A nn J #

To: CJH, EJL, PLE, FCS, TWD2.7WP8.WFKg Date: 4/24/98 6:36am ofw

Subject:

VSC-24 UT Inspection Update The inspection team is on a tight schedule this moming and requested not to have a call with us this moming unless absolutely necessary. However, they provided me with the following update The Time-of Flight UT method is a workable method to UT the both casks loaded in the future and those already loaded and in service.

The data scatter is within an acceptable range to be covered by the proposed acceptance criteria.

The inspection will continue in-office for one more week to allow the VSC 24 Owners Group to submit its UT Guideline Document. The document will contain generic information to be included in the loading procedures for each utility and the procedure for UTing previously loaded casks.

The utilities are building a new mock-up which will be used in the future to certify new UT analysts. The mock-up will be controlled such that the location of the flaws will not be known to those individuals being certified.

Overall, things look favorable for the utilities to implement the Time-of Flight UT method.

Please call me with any questions.

Tim CC: HWL, RWP, CGI, TWD2.TWPO.EMH1, TWD2.TWPO.MGV, AGH1...

? Is -

$$lU'$ UG&. Af'

I J

Mall Envelope info: (35407943.AF5 : 14 : 44888) I

Subject:

VSC 24 UT Inspection Update Croation Date: 4/24/98 6:36am l Prom: Timothy Kobotz 1 Created By: WND1 WNP7:TJK1 Recipients Post Office TWD2.TWP0 EMH1 CC (Edwin Hackett)

MGV CC (Michael Vassilaros)

Post Office TWD2.TWP8 WFK Post Office WND1.WNP7 AGH1 CC (Allen Howe)

CGI CC (Charles Interrante)

CJH (Charles Haughney)

EJL (Eric Leeds)

FCS (Frederick Sturz)

HWL CC (Henry Lee)

PLE (Patricia Eng) '

RWP CC (Ronald Parkhill)

Post Office WND2.WNP3 LLG CC (Linda Gundrum) >

^ RGS CC (Robert Schaaf)

WDR CC (William Reckley)

Domain. Post Office , Route TWD2.TWP0 TWD2.TWP0 TWD2.TWP8 TWD2.TWP8 WND1.WNP7 WND1.WNP7 WND2.WNP3 WND2.WNP3 Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1072 04/24/98 06:36am View 4109 04/24/98 02:36am Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Normal Reply Requested: No Return Notification:: None Concealed subject: No Security: Normal

- 9

_)/ n860

( 31 307 86986928681 52868592569964 3986 77631 00374 205079002074 2700859 268001 901 2 - 7 -

- _2333 1

531 934 391 66E 3E1 7E59E 938569755 68 - 06 0691 3074 0

_" 335 008 8631 37870689764 4 82568661 351 75

)

761 1 1 1 90534 333897.095247381 421 34715010674 304 1 2

_ _b_022 i

- 1 927604820020 1 001 21 0230060 51 1 006004 00200001 6

_ _X 000 000000000006.0 001 007.000000000 m000 0000000000090 002002000000000 y

(

(

557 4 57557545557545557 3 21 271 321 0 27321 027 321

_ 1 55 7251 552 721 55272 1 55 4 63 1 834 636 1 84 6361 8 4 63 9 41 251 94 1 7 2594 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 02. 00 01 00 . 0201 1 1 00 1

0 722 1 0 0

5 941

0. 1 0 0 0 1

_ I 0 0 0 0

_ X r

_ f o

y

- c_

_ la c.

_ _9 9 it 5 5 im6 6

l 5 0 r 2 9 e14 0 w1 3 7

_lo1 0

_ro-0 0-y -

_f_la c

_C __ -

_it

_9 9 5 5

_im6 1

t l 5 3

_ t r 9 e e3 1

9 e p2 2

_ h p0 2 S u3 3 r0 o 0

_f y _ -

_lc_ a

_C , .

) 8 63 3498681 68555576 51 882823 541 1 29 i7 Y 78 2582731 8379441 2 01 831 79 64971 4

(

D0,0 0 1 2. 2 3 3 0.2 2 2.0 000000 34001 00000000 1 22 00 01 2 2 0.0 00000 3.

0 00000 401 0 W

T

,e u ,

_ la

_v d_ e r

u s

a e

_m _

.) 5 51 5 551 5251 1 3451 23 I

X 0 70. 251 07551 020 5 25551 7 1522 7 0 0. 00 . 0200.0 1

0 0 00 0 . 0 0 1 0200 0 000000

_ ( 0 0 00 0 0

_D 0 0 0 0

)

LW

_ A T T_

E e_ u Mla, E v_.

RW_,

A Bc

(

a _ _

_ 1_ 1 23 5678901 2345678901 234 5678901 23 N# 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22222222223333 Uw Ra

_ l f .

Y .

R .1_2 3 5678901 2345678901 234 5678901 23 Dn 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22222222223333 l

i

~

l_v e

)

' d YY 6 EE I .

. . -x O l d

8 1 .

I i .

i

!lIl I

.E  :

l u E

l,  !$ I i

I e im i .;5 s

-i i ..g (W

l

!
:4
'i ,

si

.! i i I i!

alI.b i i

yl e <

.E j

=

!-l!Il ji i I

E

  • 4a4aRaeas O o o o o f

'3

. l ' ' l' l l I ! t i i i i ! ! I 1 ! t I

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _._..J

9 e

9

'~~

O

\

\

E

\ *

\

o E

6 O

  • O 3 .&

Q.

Yi o

i O

E O

4 h N L o

o o o o 9 9 y emeu peansvow

1

\ /

< e i  :

4 l

1 l

! . EE l .I o ci l i, ; !- l g

,. f i

- I j C $

i I

l

6 e

6 4

i

]

i I

I \

l i

Il . j

i i

{

f-i t

}- ,

i l E i 4

e.

e *L 9

l N

  • i I

1

. i l

J l

l I

i l

l l

M b

d Q.

l t  ;

1 w------- - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ __

hS WaA.XU g i

9- Shoco DRY RUN 1 (BARE METAL) n Iflaw # actual value Length actual value TWD (XI) - measured value Length 11 1 0.5 0.05 0.7 2i 2 0.5 0.075 0.4 3: 3 0.75 0.1 0.7 4i 4 0.5 0.15 0.75 SI 5 0.5 0.2 0.4 6 6 1.5 0.25 1.35 7 7 0.5 0.1 0.6 8 8 0.5 0.05 0.55 9 9 0.5 0.075 0.25 10 10 0.75 0.1 0.8 11 11 0.5 0.15 0.45 12, 12 0.5 0.2 0.45 13, 13 1.5 0.25 1.4 14! 14 0.5 0.05 0.55 15 15 0.5 0.075 0.75

16. 16 0.75 0.1 0.5 17, 17 0.5 0.15 0.5 18- 18 0.5 0.2 0.6 19 19 1.5 0.25 1.3 20 20 0.5 0.05 0.55 21- 21 0.5 0.075 0.4 22 22 0.75 0.1 0.7 23 23 0.5 0.15 0.4 24 24 0.5 0.2 0.4 25- 25 1.5 0.25 1.65

! 26 26 0.5 0.1 0.3 27, 27 0.5 0.1 0.65 28 28 0.5 0.3 0.7 29 29 0.5 0.4 0.6

30. 30 0.5 0.5 1
31. 31 0.375 0.1 0.25 32 32 0.375 0.2 0.25 33 33 0.375 0.3 0.8 I

i I

DRY RUN 1 (PAINTED) n ifiaw # actual value Length actualvalue TWD (XI) measured value Length 11 1 0.5 0.05 0.6 21 2 0.5 0.075 0.45

! 3; 3 0.75 0.1 0.6 4I 4 0.5 0.15 0.5 5; 5 0.5 0.2 0.4 6: 6 1.5 0.25 1.25 l 71 7 0.5 0.1 0.6 l 8' 8 0.5 0.05 0.5 9: 9 0.5 0.075 0.55 10 10 0.75 0.1 0.65 11 11 0.5 0.15 0.4 12' 12 0.5 0.2 0.5 Page1 f(Fl'b \

a

'9 ' . Sheet 1 t

13, 13 1.5 0.25 1.9 14: 14 0.5 0.05 l 0.7 15i 15 0.5 0.075 0.65

16
16 0.75 0.1 0.8 l 17r 17 0.5 0.15 0.7 18! 18 0.5 0.2 0.65 19l 19 1.5 0.25 1.85 20 20 0.5 0.05 0.65 i

21 21 0.5 0.075 0.25 22 22 0.75 0.1 0.55 23l 23 0.5 0.15 0.55 24l 24 0.5 0.2 0.6 25! 25 1.5 0.25 2.1 261 26 0.5 0.1 0.4 271 27 0.5 0.1 0.5 28; 28 0.5 0.3 0.7 29 29 0.5 0.4 0.6 30 30 0.5 0.5 0.5 31, 31 0.375 0.1 0.25 32: 32 0.375 0.2 0.2 33 33 0.375 0.3 0.6 l

l l

l i

Page 2

i . ,

l l

> Sheet 1 l

I' I l

l I measured value TWD (Yi) I 0.178 1 0.276 2  ;

0.283 3 l 0.236 4 0.323 5 j 0.354 6  !

0.089 7 0.228 8 0.276 9 0.238 10 0.11 11 0.386 12 1 0.438 13 j 0.075 14 )

0.095 15 I 0.145 16 0.145 17 0.217 18 l

0.226 19 '

O.05 2_0 0.11 21 0.088 22 0.138 23 <

0.212 24 0.278 25 0.092 26 0.3 27 0.365 28 O.44 29 0.491 30 0.071 31 0.112 32 0.049 33 measured valueTWD (Yi) 0.212 1 0.175 2 0.236 3

- 0.246 4 0.31 5 0.316 6 0.1 7 0.162 8 0.26 9 0.204 10 0.112 11 0.336 12 i

Page 3

e j, .

Sheet 1 0.404 13 0.093 14 O.112 15 0.117 16 l 0.193 17 O.182 18 0.27 19

- 0.053 20 0.112 21 0.086 22 0.13 23 0.198 24 0.213 25 0.1 26 0.127 27 0.318 28 0.421 29 0.51 30 0.04 31 l 0.07 32 1 0.111 33 i

V e

i 1

I j- Page 4

l. */ SNC UTinspection Plan April 17,1998 Purpose / Scope: Tc review SNC and the VSC-24 Owners Group (the VSCOG includes ANO, Pt. Beach, Palisades, and SNC) demonstration of ultrasonic testing of the structural-lid closure weld on the MSB mock up.

Dates: March 16-20,1998 and April 20-24,1998 Report No. 72 1007/98 202 Certificate Holder: Sierra Nuclear Corporation l Location: Arkansas Nuclear One Site, Russellville Arkansas, Palisades Plant Covert Michigan inspection Procedure (s): 60851 - Design Control of ISFl Components (Reference IP - 57080, NDE/UT Review / Work Observation / Record Review) inspectors: Allen Howe, SFPO (Lead) l C. Ken Battige, SFPO Mike Anderson,INEEL Steven Doctor, PNNL Debbie Jackson, RES (Observer)

VSCOG

Contact:

(ANO) Ray Keller 501-858-4688 Pager 5019641678 John Dosa 501 358-4621 Pager: 501964-3991 FAX 501-858 4685 (PAL) Em'l Zumick 616-764 2917 John Brischak 616 764 2650 l

Key inspection areas:

Perform a detailed review of the UT methodology employed to examine the structurallid closure weld. This includes actual demonstration of the UT equipment, operation, selection of the proper signals, data acquisition, data analysis, and data interpretation.

The UT technology will be demonstrated, on a full diameter mock up, under simulated field conditions including restrictions on access to the weld volume, elevated temperatures, etc. Evaluate differences between the mock-up and field conditions.

Review tabulated data on UT scans to determine error band on UT method. Data '

includes detection, sizing, type of flaw, location and orientation. Has the VSCOG determined an error band? If so evaluate the adequacy of the error band and the method for detemining it.

Review UT examination procedures. Verify that there are adequate controls described in the procedures t; ensure that personnel are qualified (to take data and/or interpret data), ,

the essential variables are controlled, and that the procedure is sufficiently detailed to  !

produce reliable and repeatable results. An examination strategy with a logic tree format 1 is expected. Evaluate the various branches of the logic tree.

Evaluate UT issues P. Scan lasue 1 UT.'near field" effects. What measures will be taken to address i l UT examination in the near field regime to assure reliable and repeatable I examination results?

Ut:n) _

l.

\ \

.; T L .

{ ,

P-Scan issue 2 - Transducer size. For flaw sizing, it is generally better to use transducers that produce the smallest practicable sound beam cross section at the

flaw location. The transducer described by the VSCOG produces a sound beam cross sectxmal area much larger than most of the flaws that are being sized. What measures is the VSCOG taking to ensure accurate flaw sizing with the transducer proposed for this UT examination technique? May provide a test block for

. examination by VSCOG. l l

. Evaluate method (s) to access MSB. Design of jacking device, set-up, operation, travel limits, etc.

. Review the ALARA planning and evaluat!on.

finger rings for setup / removal neutron and gamma surveys temporary shielding low dose waiting / observation areas significant ALARA planning should be evident wrt job sequence, practice runs, communication between ALARA and job coordinators Revie w flaw insertion documentation (DONE)

. Review mock up baseline UT data (DONE)

Review 72.48 information to determine what 72.48 evaluations will be needed.

. Miscellaneous issues:

contingencies for retrieval of lost parts, lanyards, etc.

OA/OC of demonstration inspection Objectives To observe and evaluate the

1) Proposed UT method, capabilities, limitations, and reliability
2) The overall process for feasibility, safey, ALARA, etc.
3) UT procedure guidance and VSC 24 OG control
4) 72.48 impacts l

(4 ' 01 rr.rr2 ru 4b'I99 l

n.

Wj-!isITE la i l in ! ! a8 i l ! I5 l ! !  !

s e e s e e sl a o

l

_ - s s ~ o ff etesseea e 58 i s8 5 85 i i i ii - i

}se!a!-

o o gtg ec! g e ~s e get -

ec -

s = a s e5l.;jj; = l 1 8E - 8 88 h E E E k= i= h=

= l E = lm d

2 o !  ; .  ; o j 5

l a, j t 1 .

i#

~

If I e  !

! e 3

l b a I I

h:!l!l' jW'*:l 'i E

l

! - a e!!,t E G ,

g

  • *S R :. m:
  • R S. R o S. S. a 2 M M 8 ~ -

t.oo.24.4 oc o No o g o o o o S.

o o o c o c o ,

=e g 3, g oo g i jii- i 2

1 ES 28 8 sg2N;SDN;;aa 5

. o o $ o o o iqo.2%;g ,

g i

- } ,

I '

. s

  • ' NN5$$$ $$ 8 Ill !

l- g n a ';* * * *

  • e : s c i ssceeRaz n

N e c.

e l

  • I i l i l i i l i i i l I I I i l l 1 I I I I I I I I I 1

yy l .

^

i;  ;

- 11 i e

  • ,]*

i . .

3 . . . _ .

R

.. x

. ~

m 4 '

i a . .

j g .' .

^

i ,

i , 4

, s. .

I I

\ ,

e,

. \ ,

B -

+I .

EI \ '.*

41c e .

9 '

l I ! ' I O d O i o o o O l ; j o o" o

i , l erri mag peJnseeua l iI I l l l 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I i !

l

t k

C o

k d

8 O

.e CO

] 23 _

=

J gl o

~

I W

w d

t i 8 i d i

A.. -

4 f.

i 1

i i

1