ML20217N420
| ML20217N420 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1997 |
| From: | Heffley J COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| JMHLTR:#98-0129, JMHLTR:#98-129, NUDOCS 9805050311 | |
| Download: ML20217N420 (135) | |
Text
'
Commonwealth Ediwn Gimpany Dresden Generating Station
'~
f- 6100 North Dresden Road
- Morris. II. 60150 * ,
U,. Tel HI5 942-2920 I
'v' April 30,1998 JMHLTR: #98-0129 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
Subject:
Dresden Station Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Docket Numbers50-010, 50-237, and 50-249 The purpose of this letter is to submit the Dresden Station Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report which contains the results of the radiological environmental and meteorological monitoring programs for the 1997 calendar year. The
.n Radioactive Efiluent Release Report was submitted under separate cover.
V Ifyou have any questions concerning this report, please refer them to Mr. Lary Aldrich, Dresden Station Radiation Protection Manager, at (815) 942-2920 extension 2233.
Sincerely, J. h ef Si Vice Presi nt Dresden Station j Enclosure cc: See Attached Distribution
(
t G{ 0 l
\
l h
~~j i l ;*a'itisk3'd%o; R
g A Unicom Gimpany
l.
.j
- f}
-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - -
-Attention: Document Control Desk -
One White Flint North
- 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
- (two copies)-
A. B. Beach Regional Administrator l l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III l
801 Warrenville Road Lisle,IL 60532
~ j (two copies) '
Gary Shear Chief, Plant Support Branch 2
' Division of Reactor Safety j U.S.' Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III l
801 Warrenville Road Lisle,IL 60532 O American Nuclear Insurers Library 29 South Main Street Suite 300S .
West Hartford, CT 06107-2430 (2445???) '
Frank Niziolek Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety j 1035 Outer Park Drive .
Springfield,IL 62704. '
j
- If delivered by private carrier (e.g. Federal Express), direct carrier tc the lower rear area of the
'.One White Flint North Building, Mail Station Pl-137
. ALL STATIONS
1 Environmental Law & Policy Center
- Financial Analyst - 1 203 N. LaSalle St. )
l- ~ Suite 1390 j Chicago, IL 60601 J
I U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Air and Radiation Division, Region V i
Health Physicist (AT-18J) l 77 West Jackson Blvd Chicago, IL 60604-3590 -.
L
' Ellen Saar l Teledyne p 700 Landwehr Rd -
L Northbrook, IL 60062-2310 1
Mr. Lou DelGeorge I I
= Vice President
- 37 FNE
]
i
' O Fred Ost -
u J
REMP Coordinator.
HPSD ETW III - 8* Floor L Nuclear Licensing Operations Licensing Operations Director j.- ETW III- 5* Floor Station Manager Dresden
~ Radiation Protection Manager l ' Radiation Protection Department Dresden (one copy of REOR, two copies of RERR)
REMP Coordinator
' Radiation Protection Department Dresden h.. Lawrence Rossbach Dresden Station Project Manager l.
3- .
s
.. U.S. huclear Regulatory Commission Mail Station PI-137 LWashington, D.C. 2d555.
- NRC Senior Resident Inspector Dresden '
' IDNS Resident inspector Dresden Nuclear Quality Programs Engineer Nuclear Quality Programs Dresden General Electric Co.
- Manager, Plant Service 7555 E. Collins Rd.
1 Morris, IL 60450 File / Numerical OL lO
1 1
ll DRESDEN STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 1997 O-l u
?
APRIL 1998 lg-wl 6
%. . TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRO D UCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I. . . . . . . . . . . . .
~
SUMMARY
...................................................................................................2 ...
1.0 EFFLUENTS
.1.1- Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosphere . ...... .......................... .......... .... .. . 3 1.2 ~ Liq uids Released to Illinois River .......................... .. ............. .. .... . . . . . . . 3 2.0 - SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE...... . ....................................... .. ...... . ... :31 .. ... ..... . .
3.0 ' DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseous E ffl uen t Pa thways .... ... . ............... ........ ... ....... .. ... ... ....... ..... .. . . . 3-3.1.1 Noble G ases . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.1.1 G a mma Dose Ra tes . .. . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . .... .. ... . . . .. .. . 4.. . . . . . .. . . .. ... . . .
3.1.2 3.1.1.2 Beta Air and Skin Dose Rates...... .................... .................. ..... 4 Radioacti ve Iodine .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .1 3.1.2.1 Iodine Concentrations in Air ............................................... . .... 5 3.1.2.2 Dose to Infant's Thyroid..................... .... ......... .. .. ...... ......... . .. 5
(~~ 3.1.3 Concentrations of Particulates in Air.............. 5 g
.N 3.2: Li q u id E f fl u en t Pa th ways'... . ..... ........ .. ... . . ... .... .... ... . ..... .. . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . .. . .. ... . . . . ..
............................ 5 3.3 Assessment of Dose to Member of Public................................. ...................... 5 1
4.0 SITE M ETEORO LOG Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6. . . . . . . . . . . . . .'
5.0 ENVIRONM ENTAL MONITORING.................. .. .. ......... ........ ........... ..... ....... 6 .....
5.1 G a mma Rad i a ti on . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :6. ............... -
5.2 Airborne I-131 and Particulate Radioactivity.................................................. 7 5.3 . Aquatic Radioactivit l 5.4 Milk............................y.................................................................................... 7 3
................................................. 8 j 5.5 - Special Coll ec tions . .. ... . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. .... . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ... .. . . . .
....... 8 1
- 5. 6 . Lis ting of Mi ssed Sa mples . . .. . .. ... . . . . .... . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . .. .. . .. .. ... . . . . . .
8
- 5.7 Program Modifica tions . . .. ... .. . ... . . .. . ... . . .... ... . . . . .. . ... .. . . . . . . . . .. ... .. .. .... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ...9 . . . .. .. . l
- 6. 0 - ANA LYTICAL PROC E DURES . . ... .. . .. . . .... . . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . ... . . . .... 9 .. . .. . . .. . . . . .
. 7.0 - MILCH ANIMALS AND NEAREST CATTLE CENSUSES................... ........ ....... 9 !
I' 8.0 : NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS .......... ......... ......... .............. ........ . . ... ..... 9 ........ ......
9.0 ' INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS............9.. ..... . .....
p
'( s L
d TABLE OF CONTELTS (continued)
Page APPENDIX I - DATA TABLES AND FIGURES.......................... .... .. . ........ ........... . . I1 St'ation Releases Table 1.1-1 Gaseous Effluents ..... . ......... .... . ... .. ..... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2 Table 1.2-1 Liq u id Effl u en ts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3 Table 2.0-1 Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments..... . .. ... ... .. .. 1-4 Table 2.1-1 Abnorma1 Releases.......... . .. .. .. . . .......................1-12 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1-4 Isodose and Concentration Contours.. .... ...... ....... ... . . . . ' I-15 Table 3.1-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Airborne Releases..... . .... . I-19 Table 3.2-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Liquid Effluents... . .. ..... . I-25 .
Table 3.3-1 10CFR20 Compliance Assessment............ . . .... . . . . . . . . . . I-27 Table 3.4-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Airborne Releases Based on Concurrent Meteorlogical Data.. ... . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . I-33 EnvironmentalMonitoring q
y Figure 5.0-1 Figure 5.0-2 Inner Ring TLD Locations............. ... ............ ...... . .. . . . ... I-36 Outer Ring TLD Locations..... ...............................I [
r Figure 5.0-3 Fixed Air Sampling and TLD Sites.......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-3 8 Figure 5.0-4 Near Station Water bample Locations... .. . .................... .. 1-39 Figure 5.0-5 Milk Sample Locations and More Distant Wa ter Samale Loca tions................ .. .. .. .. . ........ . .... ..... I-40 Table 5.0-1 Radiologica . Environmental Monitoring Locations .. .......... . I-41 Table 5.0-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Sannling Locations and Sample Collection and Ana . ys e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-4 2 Table 5.0 Table 5.0-6 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Qua r terly Summary................. ........ . .. . ... .. ... ...... ... .... .. . .. . I-50 Table 5.1-1 Gamma Radiation as measured by Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs).. .. ...... ....... . . . .... I-58
. APPENDIX II - METEOROLOGICAL DATA............. ....... .. ............ .. . .... ..... .. . . ... 11-1 APPENDIX III - LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES.. . . .. .. . . . ........ .... . . . .. . . . ......... III-1
' APPENDIX IV - MILCH ANIMALS, NEAREST LIVESTOCK, AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUSES...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-1 APPENDIX V -INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS......... ... V-1 O
c L
iii
INTRODUCTION
= The Dresden StatL.. is located approximately twelve miles southwest of Joliet, Illinois at the l confluence of the Des Plaines and Kankakee Rivers where thev form the Illinois River. This :l station uses two boiling water reactors (G.E. design) to generate blectricity.' Unit 1, which began ' -1
' operating in 1960 and had a rated power output of 200 megawatts electrical (MWe), was shut -
' down on August 31,1984 and is currently being decommissioned. Liquid radwaste from Unit 1 .
is transferred to Units 2 and 3 for collective processing and discharge. Units 2 and 3 began
. j operating in 1970 and 1971, respectively, each with a net rated power output of 809 MWe. 1 Lic uid effluents from Dresden n released'to the Illinois River in controlled batches after racioassay of each batch. Gaseous effluents are released to the atmosphere after delay to-permit decay of short-lived (noble) gases. Releases to the atmosphere are calculated on the basis of analyses of weekly grab samples of noble gases as well as continuously collected composite
. samples of iodine and particulate activity sampled during the course of the year. The results of effluent analyses are summarized on a monthly basis and reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as required mer Technical Specifications. Airborne concentrations of noble gases, I-131, and particulate rac ioactivity in offsite areas are calculated using isotopic composition of .
? control effluent and meteorological data.
Environmental monitoring is conducted by sampling at indicator and control (background) i
- N locations in the vicinity of the Dresden Station to measure changes in radiation or radioactivity )
V-levels that may be attributable to station operation. If significant changes attributable' to - d Dresden are measured, these changes are correlated with efflu~e nt releases. External gamma -
radiation ~ exposure from . noble gases and internal dose from I-131 in milk are the critical 1
. pathways at this site; however, a comprehensive environmental monitoring program is
. conducted which includes many other p.,thways which are less significant in terms of radiation 1 protection.
l
.s 1
M o.
SUMMARY
l Gaseous and liquid effluents for the period remained below the Dresden Station Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) limits. Calculations of environmental concentrations based on effluent, Illinois River flow, and meteorological data for the period indicate that consumption
. by the public of radioactive materials attributable'to the Dresden Station does not exceed regulatory limits. Radiation exposure from radionuclides released to the atmosphere 3 represented the critical pathway for the period with a maximum adult dose estimated to be 7.30E-03 mrem for the year, where a shielding and occupancy factor of 0.7 is assumed. The tissessment of radiation doses is performed in accordance with the ODCM. The results of these l
inalyses confirm that the station is operating in compliance with 10CFR50 Appendix I, 10CFR20 and 40CFR190.
l
~
. j 1/ i 1
O o
2 l
i
)
O 1.0 EFFLUENTS i V f 1.1 Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosohere Measured concentrations and isotopic composition of noble gases, radiciodine, and particulate radioactivity released to the atmosphere during the year are listed in Table t
.1.1-1. A total of 2.43E+02 curies of noble gases with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 1.19E+01 pCi/sec was released from Dresden Units 1,2 and 3. !
A total of 5.86E-03 curies of I-131 was released during the year with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 3.94E-04 Ci/sec.
4 i
A total of 7.97E-03 curies of beta gamma emitters was released as airborne particulate -
matter with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 4.03E-04 Ci/sec. Alpha j emitting radionuclides totaled 3.92E-06 curies. Also,5.96E+00 curies of tritium'were released with a maximum quarterly average release rcte of 2.94E-01 pCi/sec. {
i 1.2 Liquids Released to Illinois River A total of 6.61E+06 liters of radioactive liquid wastes containing 1.41E-02 curies of h fission and activation products (excluding tritium, noble gases and gross alpha) was discharged from the station. These wastes were released at a maximum quarterly N average diluted concentration of 2.36E-08 pCi/ml from all units. During the same y period,1.25E+01 curies of tritium were released with a maximum quarterly average diluted concentration of 1.64E-05 Ci/ml. Alpha emitting radionuclides were below detectable levels. Quarterly release values are given in Table 1.2-1.
' 2.01 SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE l
u Solid radioactive wastes were shipped to CNSI, Barnwell, South Carolina; AERC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; SEG, Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Hake, Memphis Tennessee. The record of waste shipments is summarized in Table 2.0-1.
[
3.0 DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways A review of the Dresden REMP air sampler stations was performed by the meteorlogical firm of Murray & Trettel in the fourth quarter of 1997. Four benchmarks were adopted to evaluate the suitability of the air sampler locations.
These were:
- 1. The aboveairthe intake should be located between two (2) and fifteen (15) meters ground.
- 2. The separation distance between air sampler inlets and walls, parapets, i; penthouses, etc. must be at least two (2) meters.
- 3. Inlets should be at least twenty (20) meters from tree drip lines (defined as "an imaginary line that is formed around a tree, extending down from the '!.
n outermost V . below") . parts of the branches, ~where moisture could fall to the ground 3
l l
l I
r (3) 4. The distance between the sampler and obstructions should be at leas times the height that the obstruction protrudes above the sampler. ;
Air sampler sites D-3,45,8,11 and 12 comply with all four benchmarks. All othe1 samplers failed to meet one or more of the benchmarks. Sites failing to meet o more of the benchmarks may tend to under-represent air concentrations under c conditions such as in summer when trees are in leaf. Dresden Station reviewing deficiencies. the Murray & Trettel report to assess proper actions to rectify the Table 3.1-1 the different summarizes exposure pathways. the doses resulting from releases of airborne rad 3.1.1 Noble Cases 3.1.1.1 Gamma Dose Rates a
Offsite gamma air and total body doses are shown in Table 3.1-1 and were calculated based on measured release rates, isotopic composition of the noble gases, and average meteorological data for the period.
Isodose contours based on concurrent meteorological data for gamma dose are shown in Figure 3.1-1.
Based on measured effluents and meteorological data, the maximum dose to an adult would be 7.30E-03 mrem for the year, with an occupancy or shielding factor of 0.7 included, and based on measured effluents and concurrent (q
"f meterological data would be 8.16E-03 mrem (Table 3.4-1). The maximum gamma air dose was 6.23E-03 mrad and 9.33E-03 mrad based on concurrent meterological data (Table 3.4-1).
3.1.1.2 Beta Air and Skin Dose Rates The range of beta particles in air is relatively small (on the order of a l' few meters or less); consequently, plumes of gaseous effluents may be considered " infinite" for the purpose of calculating the dose from beta radiation incident on the skin. However, the actual dose to sensitive i i
skin tissues is difficult to calculate due to the effect of the beta particle energies, thickness of inert skin, and clothing covering sensitive tissues.
For put oses of this report the skin is taken to have a thickness of 7.0 mg/cm and an occupancy factor of 1.0 is used. The skin dose from -
beta and gamma radiation for the year was 5.14E-03 mrem (Table 3.1-1).
The air concentrations of radioactive noble gases at the offsite receptor locations are given in Figure 3.1-2. The maximum offsite beta air dose for the year was 3.81E-04 mrad (Table 3.1-1).
3.1.2 Radioactive Iodine The human thyroid exhibits a significant capacity to concentrate ingested or inhaled iodine. The radioiodine,I-131, released during routine operation of the station, may be made available to man resulting in a dose to the thyroid. The principal pathway i
- m milk by an infant.of interest for this radionuclide is ingestion of radioiodine in (
Q) Calculations made in previous years indicate that I
4 I
~ 1
I-131 in milk are negligible. contributions to doses from inhalat 3.1.2.1 Iodine Concentrations in Air The Figurecalculated 3.1-3. These concentration contours calculations include an iodine for iodine cloud d
\
i factor which deposition on theaccounts ground. for the phenomenon of elemental iodinI i
3.4-1). concentration is estimated to be 4.11E-04 pCi/m for the year (Table {
{
3.1.2.2 Dose to Infant's Thyroid. 1 ingestion of milk was calculated. The radion j the cows pastured from May through Octob thyroid dose was less than 1.66E-02 mrem during the year (Ta..
3.1.3 Concentrations of Particulates in Air 1 k
Figure 3.1-4 The maximum offsite average level is m 1.48E-04 pCi/m3 (Table 3.4-1).
l' (j 3.2 Liquid Effluent Pathway _s The three principal pathways through the aquatic environment o for po exposure while walking on the shoreline. Not all ,
a given time or station but a reasonable approximation of the do adjusting the dose formula for season of the year or type and degree equatic environment. NRC-developed ecLuations' were used to calculate the whole body, lower GI tracts, thyroid, bone, skin; specific r use in the parameters fo waole body dose for the year was 4.77E-04 mrem mrem (Table 3.2-1). .
3.3 Assessment of Dose to Member of Public limits as shown in Table 3.1-1 and Table 3.2-1 data) and as shown in Figure 3.1-1 ( based on concurrent meterologic due to radioactive materials in liquid effluents mrem to the whom vody or 10 mrem to any organ during any calendar calendar year). quarter; 6 mrem to the whole body or 20 mrem to any
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Rev 1)
U . .
S
The RETS limits on air d.ose in noble gases released in gaseous effluents ~
to a member of the public from each reactor unit (5 mrad for gamma radiation or 10 mrad for beta radiation during any calendar quarter; 10 mrad for gamma radiation or 20 mrad for beta radiation during any calendar year). ' '
a
- The RETS limits on dose to a member of the public due.to Iodine-131, _ ;
Iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half- ;
lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released from each reactor '
unit (7.5 mrem to any organ during any calendar quarter; 15 mrem to any organ during any calendar year).:
The.10CFR20 limit on Total Effective Dose Equivalent to individual members of the public (100 mrem) (Table 3.31).
4.0 SITE METEOROLOGY
- A summary of the site meteorological measurements taken during each calendar quarter !
of the year is given in Appendix II. The data are presented as cumulative joint frequency -
distributions of the wind direction for the 300'. level and wind speed class by atmospheric stability class deterndned from the temperature difference between the 300' and 35' levels.
- Data recovery for all measurements on the tower was 99.6% during 1997 (Table 3.4-1). j 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Table 5.0-1 and Table 5.0-2 provide an outline of the Radiological Environmental i Monitoring Program (REMP) as required in the ODCM. Tables 5.0-3 to 5.0-6 summarize i data for the year.
Except for tables of special interest, tabulated results of these analyses are no longer includt d in the annual report. All data tables are available for inspection at the Station or in the Corporate Office. !
Specific findings for various environmental media are discussed below.
5.1 Gamma Radiation
.I'
.. External radiation dose from onsite sources and noble gases released to the atmosphere was measured using CaSO4 :Tm thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). j
.TLD results are listed in Table 5.1-1 and locations are shown in Figures 5.0-1 and 5.0-2.
Quarterly external radiation dose at seventeen air sampling locations averaged 15.7 mR and was similar to that measured in 1985 (13.5 mR),1986 (14.4 mR),1987 (15.8 mR),1988 (14.9 mR),1989 (15.7 mR),1990 (14.9 mR),1991 (14.0 mR),1992 (15.6 mR),
1993 (15.5 mR),1994 (14.7 mR),1995 (14.1 mR) and 1996 (13.0 mR). The differences are not statistically significant.
On March 6,1997, during a review of Commonwealth Edison's current ODCM, it was discovered that since 1991, when Comed began processing its environmental TLDs in-house, Comed has not been performing an interlaboratory comparison program to 6
I i
)
n V section 5.3.1 of the ODCM. assess measurements of environmental radia
{
Corrective action was begun in the second quarter of 1997, during which\
populated its stations' direct radiation environmental locations with its own l environmental TLDs as well as with TLDs supplied by a vendor. j (The vendor's environmental TLD program does comply witi section 5.3.1 of Comed's Comed has developed an interlaboratory comparison program for its own 4 environmental TLDs with a NVLAP-approved laboratory, and has begun an interlaboratory comparison program of its own environmental TLDs. The interlaboratory comparison program indicated that Comed's TLDs are use as environmental TLDs. Therfore, the Comed TLD records for environmental monitoring since 1991 can be considered reliable.
5.2 Airborne I-131 and Particulate Radioactiv3y Locations of the samplers are shown in Figure 5.0-3. Airborne I-131 remained the LLD of 0.10 pCi/m3 throughout the year in all analyzed samples.
Gross beta concentrations ranged from 0.7E-02 to 4.SE-02 pCi/m3 and av 2.3E-02 pCi/m3, and were similar to those in 1983 (2.0E-02 pCi/m3),1984 (2.0E-02 pCi/m3),1985 (2.0E-02 pCi/m3),1986 (2.5E-02 pCi/m3), except for the May 17 through Chernobyl), June 7 when it was influenced by the nuclear reactor accident a g 1987 (2.4E-02 pCi/m3),1988 (2.7E-02 pCi/m3),1989 (2.4E-02 pCi/m3),jj 1990 (2.0E-02 pCi/m3),1991 (2.0E-02 pCi/m3),1992 (2.2E-02 pCi/m3),1993 (2 pCi/m3),1994 (2.0E-02 pCi/m3),1995 (2.2F42 pCi/m3) and 1996 (2.2 !
Quarterly gamma isotopic results were below the LLD level3 of 0.01 pCi/m ,
l No radioactivity attributable to station operation was detected in any sample 5.3 Aouatic Radioactivity l
5.0-4 and 5.0-5, respectively.Near station water locations and more I
analysis from the Units 1 and 2/3 Inlet Canals and U U l
Canals for 1997 were 3.9 pCi/L and 4.0 pCi/L, resp I sampling period (1983-1996) the concentration averages ranged from 3.1 pCi/L i! l Unit 1 (1985). Inlet Canal (1992), to an average 6.2 pCi/L in the Units 2/3 Discharge i
and Illinois River Upstream of Morris Water Works w analyzed for gamma emitters. Cs-134 and Cs-137 levels were below the detection limit of 10 pCi/L and all other gamma emitters were below the detection limit of 20 pCi/L in all samples collected during the year.
Similar results were obtained in 1983 through 1996.
7
.Vi,) Well water samples were collected quarterly beginning October 198 for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium. The levels of activity dete in the range attributable to be to station expected operation. in this medium in the environment and were to be below the lower limits of detection of 0.1 pCi .
137 obtained those and less thanthrough in 1983 0.2 pCi/g 1996. wet weight for other gammas. The results were and Cs-137 was below the LLD level of 0.2 pCi/g d were below the LLD level of 0.2 pCi/g dry weight. j 5.4 Milk {
l 1
during the grazing season (May through October) aI the year from two required farms:
11.5 miles south southwest; and Halpin's Dairy (control location miles betasouth. I-131 was determined for each sample by chemical separation o and counting. j t
(November through April) and 0.5 pCi/L during th October). The results were similar to those obtained during the (7 ,
(.) except for samples collected during the second and third quarters of1983 - 1996 pe ,(
1986. 1-131 Chernobyl. detected in milk samples during this period is attributable to ;;!;th i
5.5 Special Collections !
Service water contaminated by leaks in the LPCI heat exchanger was released!' !'
cooling lake early in 1978. To monitor effects on the c Dresden Road and County Line Road crossings of the canal began in October 1 Concentrations of both gross beta and gamma activities have not indicated the presence of detectable concentrations of radioactivity due to the station. Data tables are available for inspection at the Station.
In June,1994, elevated tritium levels were discovered in the onsite storm sewers.
special program was initiated to identify, locate, and correct the source or sources of radioactivity. Numerous wells have been drilled, and sampling and analysis fro those wells and the storm sewers continues. Results of the 1997 sampling are available for inspection at the Station. Separate reports on the Dresden spec sampling program are prepared by Comed and distributed to the NRC and Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety.
5.6 Listing qf Missed Samoles Samples, AppendixIII.All samples were collected as scheduled except for t 8
l e
l 5.7 - Emgram Modifications j\ -
No modifications to the program were~made in the 1997 sampling yea L
i 6.0 ' ANALYTICAL PROCEDURER j; A summary of the procedures used formples analyzing ged.
is given in Appendix VI of the report for the period January - December 19 7.0. MILCH ANIMALR AND NEAREST CATTLE CENSUS i.
- ~ Census of milch animals and nearest cattle were e radius of theconducted station. The survey was conducted by " door-to-door" canvas by A
and 27,1997. . Results of the milch animal and nearest cattle census are
{. Appendix IV.
. presented in -
There are no dairy farms within a five mile radius of the Dresden Nucle i1 on.
~
i 8.0 . NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS :
1 The residentnearest census areresident presented incensus was conducted on August 20/1997.
Appendix IV. s
-Rl
'{
9.0 INTERL ABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS
}
Teledyne's Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results are presen' .
i l
i l
O 9
l0 1
f l
)
1 l
l- APPENDIX I a
DATA TABLES AND FIGURES t
lO I
(
l I
I l-t i
i l
i O
I- 1
TABLE 1.1-1
/"T C/ SUMMATION OF ALL GASEOUS RELEASES TYPE OF RELEASE
]
EST. TOTAL UNITS ist Quarter 2nd Quarter ERROR,%
A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES
- 1. Total Release Ci 8.10E+01 6.61 E +00 7.31 E+00 l
- 2. Average Release Rate for Period pCi/sec 1.04 E +01 8.41 E-01
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % *
- j B. IODINES
- 1. Total todine-131 Cl 3.06E-03 4.39E-04 2.16E+01 l l
- 2. Average Release Rate of 1131 for Penod pCi/sec 3.94E-04 5.58E-05 I
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % *
- l
- 4. Total lodine-131, lodine-133 and lodine-135 Cl 7.22E-03 2.10E-03 I l
C. PARTICULATES l
- 1. Particulates with half-lives > 8 days Ci 1.65E-03 3.17E-03 3.41 E+01 l I
- 2. Average Release Rate for Period pCusec 2.12E-04 4.03E-04
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % * *
- 4. Gross Alpha Radioactivity Ci <LLD 7.81 E-07 D. TRITIUM
- 1. Total Release Ci 1.07E+00 1.17E+00 7.89E+001
- 2. Average Release Rate for Period pCi/sec 1.38E-01 1.49E-01 g 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % *
- EST. TOTAL ;
UNITS 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter ERROR.% l A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES i
- 1. Total Release l Ci 6.01 E +01 9.48E+01 7.31 E+00 l l
- 2. Average Release Rate for Penod :tCi/sec 7.64E+00 1.19E+01 l
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Lima % *
- B. lODINES
- 1. Total lodine-131 C6 1.13E-03 1.23E-03 2.16E+01 l
- 2. Average Release Rate of 1131 for Penod pCi/sec 1.43E-04 1.55E-04
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % * *
- 4. Total lodine-131, lodine-133 and lodine-135 Ci 1.59E-02 1.80E-02 C. PARTICULATES
- 1. Particulates with half-hves > 8 days Ci 2.19E-03 9.64E-04 3.41 E+01 l
- 2. Average Release Rate for Penod pCi/sec 2.79E-04 1.21 E-04
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % * *
- 4. Gross Alpha Radcactivity Ci 4.94E-08 3.09E-06 D. TRITIUM
- 1. Total Release Cl 1.38E+00 2.34E+00 7.89E+00 l
- 2. Average Release Rate for Period pCi/sec 1.76E-01 2.94E-01
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit %
- I Q/
l I- 2 I
i
TABLE 1.1 1 (continued)
(]
Li SUMMATION OF LIQUID EFFLUENTS UNITS 1st Quarter 2nd Ouarter EST. TOTAL ERROR.%
A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS
- 1. Total Release (not including H 3, gases, alpha) Ci 5.40E-03 4.71 E-03 1.06E+01 l
- 2. Average Diluted Conc. During Period Ci/ml 2.33E-08 1.38E-08 j
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % *
- l B. TRITIUM
- 1. Total Release Ci 2.49E+00 4.09E+00 1.14E+01 l
- 2. - Average Diluted Conc. During Release Ci/mi 1.07E-05 1.20E-05
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % *
- C. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES
- 1. Total Release Ci 9.12E-05 1.18E-04 5.58E+00 )
- 2. Average Diluted Conc. During Period Ci/mi 3.93E-10 3.45E 10
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit %
- D. GROSS ALPHA ACTIVITY
- 1. Total Release l Ci l (LLD l <LLD l 1.51 E+01 l p
b E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED (prior to dilution) l Liters l 1.84E+08 l 2.98E+06 l 5.00E+00 l D. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING PERIOD l Liters l 2.30E+08 l 3.38E+08 l 5.00E+00 l EsT. TOTAL UNITS 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter ERROR.%
A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS
- 1. Total Release (not including H-3 gases alpha) Ci 2.35E-03 1.59E-03 1.06E+01 l
- 2. Average Diluted Conc. Dunng Penod pCi/mi 2.36E-08 5.68E-09
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit % *
- B. TRITIUM
- 1. Total Release Ci 1.32E+00 4.58E+00 1.14E+01 l
- 2. Average Diluted Conc. During Release pCi/ml 1.33E-05 1.64E-05
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit _ %
C. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES
- 1. Total Release Ci <LLD <LLD 5.58E+00 l
- 2. Average Diluted Conc. During Penod Ci/mi <LLD <LLD
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit %
- D. GROSS ALPHA ACTIVITY
- 1. Total Release l C6 l <LLD l <LLD l 1.51 E+01 l E. VOLUME OF WAST E RELEASED (pnor to dilut on) l Liters l 7.99E+05 l 9.86E+05 l 5.00E+001
\. / D. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING PERIOD l Liters l - 9.87E+07 l 2.79E+08 l 5.00E+00 l I-3
i l
TABLE 2.0-1 1
( DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION i
-( _
UNITS 1,2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT January through June 1997 Docket Numbers: 50-237/50 249 UNIT 2&3 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS A. SOLID ' WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (NOT IRRADIATED FUEL) en. w smw. s
- 1. Type of Waste Unit 6-month period
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc. m' 8.70E+0! 12.4 Ci 5.84E+02
- b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc. mi 1.68E+03 16.6 Ci 9.61E + 00
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. m' None Ci None !
- d. Other (describe) m' None ;
Ci None
- 2. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition (by type of waste)
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc.
Percent % Curies Co-60 3.07E+ 01 1.79E+02 !
Fe-55 5.23E+01 3.05E+02 Mn-54 7.50E +00 4.39E +01 Cs-137 6.70E+00 3.90E+01
- b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
Co-60 2.43E+01 2.32E+00 Fe-55 5.66E + 0! 5.39E+00 I Mn-54 1.77E+ 01 1.69E +00 )
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc.
None.
- d. Other None.
1 I
I l-4
l I
. TABLE 2.0-I (continued) {
/* ' DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION -
UNITS 1,2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT January through June 1997 Docket Numbers: 50-237/50-249 UNIT 2&3 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS (Cont.) j
. 3. Solid Waste Disposition l NUMBER OF SHIPMENTS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION 23 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) CNSI, Barnwell, SC 16 ' Motor Freight (exclusive use only) AERC, Oak Ridge, TN 16- Motor Freight (exclusive use only) Hake, Memphis, TN
- B. IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS (Disposition)
NUMBER OF SHIPMENTS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION None l
1 O
- o 1-5
l 1
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
A DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION
]
i -V UNITS 1,2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT July Through December 1997 Docket Numbers: 50-237/50-249
)
UNIT 2&3 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS
! A'. SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (NOT IRRADIATED FUEL) s.t T i srmr. s f
- 1. Type of Waste Unit 6-month period l
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc. m3 5.65E + 01 12.4 Ci 5.98E+02
- b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc. m' 2.54E + 03 16.6 Ci 1.44E+01 j 2
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. m 5.60E-01 20 Ci 1.10E + 04 3
i d. Other: Soil / Sludge m 1.44E + 02 20 ]
Ci 4.14E-03 l
- 4 l 2. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition (by type of waste) l \
l a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc. -
l Percent % Curies i Co-60 4.02E +01 2.41E+02 I t Fe-55 4.77E +01 ' 2.85E+02 !
l Mn-54 7.07E+ 00 4.23E+01 l Cs-137 3.45E+00 2.06E+01 t
l
- b. Dry compressib!e waste, contaminated equipment, etc. j Co-60 3.40E+0! 4.88E+ 00 Fe-55 5.00E+01 7.27E +00 Mn-54 1.40E+01 2.07E+ 00
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc.
Co-60 5.09E+ 01 5.60E+03 Fe-55 4.34E +01 4.79E +03 Ni-63 4.80E +00 5.29E+02
- d. Other: Soil / Sludge Fe-55 6.66E+01 2.77E-03 Cs-137 .1.40E + 00 5.70E-05 Co-60 2.84E+01 1.18E-03 O.
1-6
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1,2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT July Through December 1997-Docket Numbers: 50-237/50-249 1
UNIT 2&3 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS (Cont.) l
- 3. Solid Waste Disposition NUMBER OF SHIPMENTS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION 22 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) CNSI, Barnwell, SC 16 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) AERC, Oak ' Ridge, TN
, 8 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) Hake, Memphis, TN - ,
l' 1 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) SEO, Oak Ridge, TN l B. IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS (Disposition)
NUMBER OF SHIPMENTS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION None l
l I-7
l l
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
Q DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION C/ UNITS 1,2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT January through June 1997 Docket Number: 50-10 UNIT 1 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SillPMENTS A. SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (NOT IRRADIATED FUEL) En. T nrmr. s
- 1. Type of Waste Unit 6-month period
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc. m' l .84E + 01 12.4 Ci 3.85E+ 01
- b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc. m$ 1.45E +03 16.6 Ci 1.45E-01
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. m) None l Ci None
~
- d. Other (describe) m3 None Ci None
- 2. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition (by type of waste)
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc.
Percent % Curies Co-60 3.01E+01 1.16E+01 Fe-55 -2.09E + 00 8.05E-01 Ni-63 5.91E+01 2.28E +0i Cs.137 5.74E+00 2.21E+00
- b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
Co-60 2.23E+01 3.23E-02 Ni-63 5.37E+ 01 7.79E-02 Cs-137 1.84E+01 2.67E-02
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. j None.
l
- d. Other None.
i I-8 I
- TABLE 2.0-1 (continued) l /~s DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION i .
UNITS 1,2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT.
January through June 1997 -
Docket Number: 50-10 UNIT 1 SOLID WASTE AND 1RRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS (Cont.)
- 3. Solid Waste Disposition -
, NUMBER OF SHIPMENTS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION 5 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) CNSI, Barnwell, SC 15 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) AERC, Oak Ridge, TN 4 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) Hake, Memphis, TN B. IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS (Disposition) l NUMBER OF SHIPMENTS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION None l
l i
l 1
I l
I-9
i TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
.( _
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1,2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT July through December 1997 Docket Number: 50-10 UNIT 1 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS A. SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (NOT IRRADIATED FUEL) a Ta rme. s
- 1. Type of Waste Unit 6-month period
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc. m3 None Ci None ,
i 2
- b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc. m 1.68E+03 16.6 Ci 1.53E+00 ,
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. m 3 None j Ci None 3
]
- d. Other (describe) m None l l
Ci None
- 2. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition (by type of waste)
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc.
None.
- b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
Percent % Curies Co-60 2.23E +01 3.41E-01 Ni-63 5.37E +01 8.22E-01 1 Cs-137 1.84E+01 2.82E-01 l
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. I None. l
- d. Other None.
O v
I-10
1 TABLE 2.0-1 (conti"ued) if \E: ~
DRESDEN' NUCLEAR POWER STATION
. UNITS 1,2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT July through December 1997 Docket Number: 5010 UNIT 1 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS (Cont.)
l
- 3. Solid Waste Disposition l
NUMBER OF SHIPMENTS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION l 15 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) AERC, Oak Ridge, TN 15 Motor Freir,ht (exclusive use only) Hake, Memphis, TN l
i B. . IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS (Disposition)
NUMBER OF SHIPMENTS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION None
, i b
J l
L I-11
TABLE 2.1-1 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION f
( UNITS 1,2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT January Through June 1997 ABNORMAL RELEASES
- A. LIQUID 1 Number of Releases: 1**
- 2. Total Activity Releases: - 1.09E-3 Ci
.B. GASEOUS
- 1. Number of Releasesi 3**
- 2. Total Activity Releases: 9.59E-04 Ci A.1 In June,1994, elevated tritium levels were discovered in the on-site storm sewers. The highest storm drain concentration, 1.1IE+03 pCi/l, from the 3rd quarter was used for both the 1st and 2nd half of 1997. The total activity released is based on an estimated typical discharge flow of 10 gallons per minute. An estimated 1.09E-03 Ci of H-3 may have been released into the environment. Various storm sewer locations on-site are now periodically analyzed for tritium.
W 2.1 On March 18,1997 it was discovered that the Unit 3 Main Turbine had a gland seal leak which was allowing steam to C enter the II3 Turbine Oil Reservoir. There is an exhaust fan on the reservoir which exhaust directly into the environment with no monitoring. It is unknown when the leak started. The leak stopped on March 27,1997 when the Unit was shutdown for a refuel outage. The gland seal was repaired. The following activity is estimated to have been released to the environment:
Co-60 4.85E +02 Ci Mn-54 5.50E+01 pCi Xe-135 9.40E+01 Ci Xe-135m 3.07E+02 pCi B.2 'the East Turbine Building Ventilation System was found to have a contaminated fan blade in 1996. This system is designed to pull air in from outdoors and ventilate non-Radiologically Posted Areas and then exhaust the air back into the environment. It is unknown when the fan blade become contaminated. Smears of the ductwork indicate the presence of Co-60, Ba-133 and Cs-137. An estimated 8.00E+00 pCi of Co-60,3.00E+00 Ci of Ba-133 and 5.00E+00 pCi of Cs-137 may have been exhausted into the environment for all of 1997. l B.3 The heating steam system has low level contamination present. During operation of the system, some steam is ventel directly into the environment, Isotopic analysis of the condensate in the system indicate the presence of Co-60, Mn-54 and Cs-137.- An estimated 2.'X)E-01 Ci of Co-60,1.60E+00 Ci of Mn-54 and 2.50E-01 pCi of Cs-137 may have been l
exhausted into the environment for all of 1997.
l
- 'Ihese releases are not included in the Effluents Summation of all Releases Tables but are included in the Radiological I npact on Man.
- Releases A.1, B.2 and B.3 are abnormal releases which lasted more than the six month designation of the list.
1-12
TABLE 2.1-1 (continued)
O
\._./
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION
< UNITS 1,2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT July Through December 1997 ABNORMAL RELEASES
- A. LIQUID
- 1. Number of Releases: 0**
- 2. Total Activity Releases: 1.1IE-03 Ci B. GASEOUS
- 1. Number of Releases: 2"
- 2. Total Activity Releases: 1.38E-02 Ci A.1 In June,1994, elevated tritium levels were discovered in the on-site storm sewers. The highest storm drain concentration, 1.11E+03 pCi/1, from th: 3rd quarter was used for both the 1st and 2nd half of 1957. The total activity released is based on an estimated typical discharge flo-: of 10 gallons per minute. An estimated 1.1103 Ci of H-3 may have been released into the environment, Various storm sewer locations on-site are now periodically analyzed for tritium.
O yll On September 4,1997 it was discovered that the gland seal on the Unit 3 Main Turbine which had been repaired during the previous refuel outage was leaking again allowing steam to enter the U3 Turbine Oil Reservoir. There is an exhaust fan on the reservoir which exhaust directly into the environment with no monitoring. It is unknown when the leak resumed. The leak continued through the end of 1997 into 1998. The following activity is estimated to have been released to the environment:
Kr-87 5.15E+02 pCi Xe-138 1.20E+04 pCi B.2 The East Turbine Building Ventilation System was found to have a contaminated fan blade in 1996. This system is designed to pull air in from outdoors and ventilate non-Radiologically Posted Areas and then exhaust the air back into the environment, it is unknown when the fan blade become contaminated. Smears of the ductwork indicate the presence of Co-60, Ba-133 and Cs-137. An estimated 8.00E+00 pCi of Co-60,3.00E+00 pCi of Ba-133 and 5.00E+00 pCi of Cs-137 may have been exhausted into the environment for all of 1997. This release was attributed as an abnormal release in the first half of 1997 and the pCi values are not included in the 1997 s cond half totals.
B.3 The heating steam system has low level contamiration present. During operation of the system, some steam is vented directly into the environment. Isotopic analysis of the condensate in the system indicate the presence of Co-60, Mn-54 and ,
Cs-137. An estimated 2.00E-01 pCi of Co-60,1.60E+00 Ci of Mn-54 and 2.50E-01 pCi of Cs-137 may have been exhausted into the environment for all of 1997. This release was attributed as an abnormal release in the first half of 1997 and the pCi values are not included in the 1997 second half totals.
- These releases are not included in the Effluents Summation of all Releases Tables but are included in the Radiological Impact on Man.
C?* Releases A.1, B.2 and B.3 are abnormal releases which lasted more than the six month designation of the list.
\.
1-13
TABLE 2.1 1 (continued)
A DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION V UNITS 1,2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT July Through December 1997 (cont.)
7 ABNORMAL RELEASES
- B.4 The "5 year test" was performed on the Unit 2 (September) and the Unit 3 (November) Isolation Condensers. During the test, Condenser shell side water is converted to steam and exhausted directly into the atmosphere. For Units 2 and Unit 3 the total activity released into the environment is estimated at:
H-3 7.10E+02 pCi Fe-55 4.70E+02 Ci Mn 54 7.51E+00 pCi Co-60 5.31E +01 pCi Cs-137 1.15E+00 Ci Sb-122 3.45E-01 Ci O
l
- These releases are not included in the Effluents Summation of all Releases Tables but are included in the Radiological Impact on
- Man.
V l
l I-14 (
^\
(Q FIGURE 3.1-1 a
soo g .
v Ag l
Estimated Cumulative Gamma Dose (in mrem) ,'
from the Dresden Station for the period ' .
N January-December 1997 .,
,y T =
Isooleth Labets 250 g ', ~
Small figure - multiply by 10 - -
Large figure - multiply by 10' h
i
, i SCALE
,e , 0,,,,_.__.' _ 8 ,,, g 3 Y rkvelig #o va %
IE W
, Ploinf eid =
c 're .
o l K E N A L L II E
\ / ,ein,
- n. us e
,n
!*' $ '\
/ us se f Sw ooed
./ e s
- g. -
- r. o -
ot, . ,,' i 8 #
\t.Yn"i fs o EJeE
. ...o . 4o ,
g 0 y I L L
-d ,
25o . Monhole n r..
a SI E
] ?
7
, , E 18erris Nl ,
[ u s,3
, s o ,. . . .
C 'a
S neco t
- on uoson
,x ,, ; : Wilmi e'c ' * =
2-G R .,t U N .0 Y s ', ,
- y,,,,, erun.n. ', '
o x Gordnel e tiies V ,
@o South Wdming toa. K A N k
,4
- _ ,__ v. et t 87 p o a SCALE io is to uites
- o. .s so is to a_s so nu I - 15 l
I
\
)
i *
~ O'%) FIGURE 3.1 \
a i l
a 1 Estimated TotalConcentrations (in pCl/m3)
E M. ,.
4%
of Noble Gases from the Dresden Station for the period January-December 1997 Sh*h g .20o T, ,
', 4i Isooleth Labels - 10 0 % * -
Small figure - multiply by 102 .
Large figure - multiply by 10~2 *
(N y
SCALE
.e '
' E
- .p Y 'krelle I
" ~ ww i
Pro nt, eld i
i,
- *?
s ,
d
- Looper, -
E E N O A t ( ,
... .i W
xm, e Nea p og ,,_* 25 f r tene.
l l' i g
, -.
- fato
' ~ - - .
j "w t t' .
. 4. *$
e 5
5 I
s..a ) s t'
10 0
'~
l r, n
=
g
',o Morris l /
50 -- % ) _ us st
/
,g,t
'^ ?
+
- , c,,;' '
'* **' A - . . .
,o..
0 , 9 U N o y ,
'N
"" ** e l.... .n. '4 c ,, ,
L.... -
s corone, N lo . m ,@,
e seven I'"'
Wilm.neton. ,
r
/c,g
% ' et t 17
(
o
^ 8 SCALE to ,,
I0 "'kIS
\ O g f0 9 g$
30 au I- 16
I l
l FIGURE 3.1-3
? , el Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCilm3)
- g"^A '
of fodines from the Dresden Station for the period January-December 1997 : ' .6 I
lsooleth labels I Small figure - muftiply by 10 4 -
Large sigure multiply by 104
- g h SCALE b
witt s T'$Y vine , a
~
xv Ploint.eis S' ' 'f e N
j D A L L f K#+ fi ' #
[f_-j' '
g U$$jlif,.t "h g %
a .
eno, m
- 's, s, ease
' - . t *o ,
O
/
! cwo., L L a
d 25 t( l 50 % Hon
/ ,(' , 200
,o ' #
/ i
,j,,,s.
e_ ;, , , s ' ' =
"~"'
m ._
t s % *
=
, , , , )i ha' /3/
5
,m ,
G V y N O v'< a [y' 'si.... n. <,,
u....
Gardnee'
= i c ...
s' . W.im%*** - K A N Y
/;*
e, t er
~ .
SCALE o , * ,,,,,,,
f' es
^ * 's t.o es p ,,
I - 17
l t
' FIGURE 3.1-4 i
l[' _ l l i
- , 500 g Estimated Totat Concentrations (in pCi/m3) ,-
' %.x 3*' (
I of Particulates from the Dresden Station M )
for the period January December 1997
- l Isooleth labels %500 #- ' !
l Small figure - multiply by 10 - '
Large figure - muttiply by 10 '
, h scate
'a
- j
, g' " t ,
wrs f v ,=,,ne ,
/ s/,, , ,
- 3 Ploint,,rg %
30 ~
c ,
lll. ,
5 Lo .
r
- kg // NP Le***t K E : g N A L L;
- u. . .
M...s ")
l
"" - ?,. ., m o : r' .
~.
Lemos p A*c 1
/ n.. - . . - -
t.es I
?
,t-
, e .
j a
5 ,s W i t L 230 ,_
' Monno, ,
l r.ee j o,, si g ,
i I
-e ion c 8 Morris _ __
~. '
Q- 'g s7. *
, .co.a.,
- <b
- sen,' ~d
/
'a a s c7,'
j,[ A
./
aroid.
+
y/' ',
G q U N O 4 ,
I s
y - L .. . .
coronel M
/ g *""
o south
- Wilmington' K A N y
}.9 s
- - - - . et t er bV o ,
SC At.E
is to M rs
! 9. ., ' '? to as 39 ,
I - 18 t
I TABLE 3.1-1 DRESDEN STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1997 MAXIMUM. DOSES RESULTING'FROM~ AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/97 TO'12/31/97 CALCULATED 04/13/98 INFANT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER -QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 e .(MRAD) ( ) ( ) ( )
l ( -) ( )
BETA AIR 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 (MRAD) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
TOT. BODY 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 (MREM) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
SKIN 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 (MREM) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
ORGAN 6.01E-05 1.40E-05 1.92E-05 2.33E-05 1.11E-04 (MREM) (SSE ) (N ) (SSE ) (N ) (SSE )
LIVER LUNG LUNG LUNG LIVER THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1997 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I INFANT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I. ------------
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR' YRLY % OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP- OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00, 0.00' O.00 10.0 0.00 BETA-AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT.. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.00 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00
% LIVER LUNG LUNG LUNG LIVER sd RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I - 19
()
l TABLE 3.1-1 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1997 MAXIMUM-DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES <
PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/97 TO 12/31/97 CALCULATED 04/13/98 ADULT RECEPTOR l
l 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 (MRAD) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) j BETA AIR 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 '
(MRAD) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
/~%
()~
TOT. BODY (MREM)
SKIN 0.00E+00
'(
0.00E+00
)
0.00E+00
(
0.00E+00
)
0.00E+00
( )
0.00E+00 0.00E+00
(
0.00E+00
)
0.00E+00
( )
0.00E+00 (MREM) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
- ORGAN 5.45E-05 2.59E-05 3.74E-05 3.32E-05 1.46E-04 j (MREM) (SSE ) (N ) (SSE )- (N ) (SSE ) j LIVER GI LLI GI LLI GI LLI
~
GI LLI
~
THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1997 i
COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I ADULT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I. ------------
j QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.00 l SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 l ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 LIVER GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI l RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 i
[~'c ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995
\m) ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I- 20 l
. _r
, 0 L
TABLE 3.1-1 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION UNIT TWO ACTUAL 1997 MAXIMUM DOSES: RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES !
PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/97 TO 12/31/97 CALCULATED 04/13/98 INFANT RECEPTOR 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL QUARTER JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 7.93E-05 3 ^.15E- 0 5 5.66E-05 1.04E-03 1.21E-03 (MRAD) (N - ) (N. .) (N ) (N ) (N )
BETA AIR 4.87E-06 1.98E-05 4.59E-06 3.27E-05 5.99E-05 (MRAD) (E ) (N ) (E ) (E ) (N )
TOT. BODY 5.98E-05 2.35E-05 4.27E-05 ~2.75E-03 2.83E-03 (MREM) (N- ) (N ) .N
( -) (WNW ). -(WNW )
f*.
SKIN (MREM) 6.55E-05 (N )
3.12E-05
. (N )
4.75E-05 (N
8.35E-04 9.79E-04 1
) (N ) (N~ )
ORGAN 4.81E-04 8.87E-04 9.11E-04 4.16E 2.70E-03 (MREM) (N. ) (N ) (N ) '. ( N ). (N )
THYROID THYROID -THYROID THYROID THYROID THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1997 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I INFANT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I. ------------
1 QTRLY iST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR. _4TH QTR YRLY % OF.
OBJ -JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I-GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 '10.0- 0.01
. BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 LTOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 5.0 0.06 SKIN ' (MREM) . 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 15.0 0.01
. ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 15.0 0.02 THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 E
I - 21
n
' h v
l-c TABLE 3.1-1 (continued)
.DRESDEN STATION UNIT TWO 1 r
ACTUAL 1997-MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES
!- PERIOD'OF RELEASE - 01/01/97 TO 12/31/97 CALCULATED 04/13/98 ADULT ~ RECEPTOR F 1ST; 2ND 3RD- 4TH 1 TYPE QUARTER. QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL ,
JAN-MAR- APR-JUN' -JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 7.93E-05 ~ 3.15E 5.66E-05 1.04E-03 1.21E-03 (MRAD)- (N ') (N ) (N ) (N ) - (N )
-BETA AIR. 4.87E-06 1.98E-05 4.59E-06. 3.27E-05 5.99E-05 (MRAD) (E ) (N ). - (E - ) (E ) (N ) l TOT.-BODY '5.98E-05 2.35E-05 4.27E-05 2.75E-03 2.83E-03 E (MREM) (N ) (N ) (N )- (WNW ) (WNW )
f^3 - SKIN 6.55E-05 3.12E-05 4.75E-05 8.35E-04 9.79E-04
- \f '
(MREM) (N ) (N ) (N ) -- ( N .)' (N )
ORGAN 4.83E-04 1.10E-03 1.22E-03 5.79E-04 3.35E-03 (MREM) (N ) (N ) (N- ) - (N . ) (N )-
THYROID GI_LLI THYROID THYROID- GI_LLI THIS'IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1997 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I '
ADULT RECEPTOR
...... ..... g op App I, .............
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I.
P
' GAMMA AIR-(MRAD)'. 5.0 OBJ0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 10.0 0.01 BETA AIR (MRAD) '10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00
. TOT. BODY-(MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 5.0 0.06' i
' SKIN '- (MREM) .7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 15.0 0.01 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 15.0- 0.02
]
g THYROID _ GI_LLI THYROID. THYROID GI_LLI 3 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 j l .- .
ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 j l
l l 1 - 22
1
- k. i) i 1
1 TABLE 3.1-l '(continued)
DRESDEN STATION UNIT THREE ACTUAL 1997 MAXIMUM DOSES.RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/97 TO 12/31/97 CALCULATED 04/13/98 INFANT RECEPTOR 1ST 2ND 3RD. 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC y GAMMA AIR 1.81E-03 4.99E 9.29E-04 2.24E-03 5.02E-03' ;
- (MRAD) (N ) (N' ) (N ) (N ,~) (N ) i l BETA AIR 1.13E-04 5.2SE-06 7.75E-05 1.25E-04 .3.21E-04 I h (MRAD) (E ) (E ) (E ) (E . ) (E ) !
TOT. BODY 1.36E-03 3.76E-05 7.01E-04 3.16E-03 4.47E-03 '
I (MREM) (N ) (N ) (N
\~) e SKIN l'. 4 9E- 0 3 4.27E-05 7.83E-04
) (WNW ).
1.84E-03 (WNW )
4.16E-03 I
j (MREM) (N )- (N- ) . (N - ). (N ) (N ) !
ORGAN 7.91E 1.41E-03 2.94E-03 2.04E-03 1.38E-02 (MREM) '(NNW ) (N. )- .(E ) (N ) (N )
l LUNG- THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1997 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I INFANT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I. ------------
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR-(MRAD) 5.0 0.04 0.00 0.02 0.04 10.0 0.05 BETA AIR (.MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,
0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.13 5.0 0.09 SKIN (MREM) 75 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02 15.0 0.03 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.11 0.02 0.04 0.03 15.0 0.09 LUNG THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID l
RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 3.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995
( )E ODCM OATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I - 23
1 t'b l Q.)
l n
TABLE 3.1-1 (continued) i DRESDEN STATION UNIT THREE ACTUAL 1997 '
MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES !
PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/97 TO 12/31/97 CALCULATED 04/13/98 {
ADULT RECEPTOR !
l 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 1.81E-03 4.99E-05 9.29E-04 2.24E-03 5.02E-03 (MRAD) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N )
BETA AIR 1.13E-04 5.25E-06 7.75E-05 1.25E-04 3.21E-04 (MRAD) (E ) (E ) (E ) (E ) (E ) ;
/~^1 TOT. BODY 1.35E-03 3.76E-05 7.01E-04 3.16E-03 4.47E-03 C/ (MREM) (N ) (N ) (N ) (WNW ) (WNW )
SKIN 1.49E-03 4.27E-05 7.83E-04 1.84E-03 4.16E-03 (MREM) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N )
ORGAN 8.01E-03 1.60E-03 3.27E-03 2.22E-03 1.46E-02 (MREM) (NNW ) (N ) (SSE ) (N ) (N )
t LUNG THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID i THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1997 l l
I COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I l ADULT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I. ------------
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF i OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.04 0.00 0.02 0.04 10.0 0.05 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.13 5.0 0.09 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02 15.0 0.03 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.11 0.02 0.04 0,03 15.0 0.10 LUNG THYROID THYROID THYROID THYROID
,_s RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994
/ i ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995
\/ ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I - 24
_ ~
- f. T-I L
TABLE 3.2 L DRESDEN STATICI: UNIT TWO ACTUAL 1997 MAXIMUM DOSES (MREM) RESULTING FROM AQUATIC EFFLUENTS. !
PERIOD OF RELEASE-- 01/01/97.TO 12/31/97 CALCULATED 04/13/98 i ADULT RECEPTOR i
1ST 2ND 3RD' 4TH- !
DOSE ~ TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL QUARTER l JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC l
TOTAL l
6.38E-05 l 17E-04 2.11E-05 3.63E-05 2.39E 1 BODY INTERNAL 9.50E-05 1.75E-04 3.07E-05 4.95E-05 3.50E-04 ORGAN LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1997 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 APP. I
% OF APP I. ------------
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF OBJ JAN-MAR- APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I TOTAL BODY (MREM) 1.5 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 3.0 0.01 CRIT. ORGAN (MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER L RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 l
O u
I - 25 i i
p L
TABLE 3.2-1 (continued) l 1
- j DRESDEN STATION UNIT THREE
- ACTUAL 1997 MAXIMUM DOSES (MREM) RESULTING FROM AQUATIC. EFFLUENTS l-PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/97 TO 12/31/97. CALCULATED 04/13/98.-
ADULT RECEPTOR IST. ~2ND 3RD 4TH-
' DOSE TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN -JUL-SEP OCT-DEC-TOTAL '6.38E-05 1.18E-04 2.01E-05 3.63E-05 2.38E-04
,. p BODY ~
INTERNAL 9.50E-05 1.75E-04 2.91E-05 4.95E-05 ORGAN 3.49E-04 LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER. '
THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR' YEAR 1997 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 APP. I -
.% OF APP'I. ------------
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I TOTAL BODY (MREM) -1.5 ~0.00 0.01- 0.00 0.00 3.0 0.01 CRIT. ORGAN (MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER
-RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January -1995
! 'u.
l 0
I - 26
a t-(
TABLE 33-1 DRESDEN STATION UNIT ONE 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE' ASSESSMENT l
PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/97 TO 12/31/97 CALCULATED 04/13/98 1, 10 CFR 20.1301 (a) (1) Compliance qr Total Effective Dose Egivalent,' mrem /yr 1.31E-04 10 CFR 20.'1301 (a (1) limit mrem /yr 100.0
% of limit 0.00 t
i Compliance Summary - 10CFR20 1st 2nd 3rd 4th % of -
. Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr Limit TEDE 5.53E-05 2.10E-05 3.01E-05 3.03E-05 0.00 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 l ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 >
l Li(:)
I- 27 o
L.
TABLE 3.3-1 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION UNIT ONE 10 CFR'20~ COMPLIANCE ASS'ESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT- 01/01/97 TO 12/31/97 CALCULATED 04/13/98 2.. 10 CFR 20.1301 (d) /40 CFR 190 Compliance I (~ Dose Limit % of.
l \_ L (mrem) (mrem) Limit j Whole Body Plume 0.00E+00 (DDE) Skyshine 0.00E+00 Ground 8.88E-05 Total. 8.88E-05 25.0 0.00-Organ. Dose.' Thyroid 4.02E-05 75.0 0.00 ;
(CDE) Gonads 4.11E-05 25.0 0.00 Breast 4.03E-05 25.0 0.00 Lung- 4.23E-05 25.0 0.00 l- Marrow 4.05E-05 25.0 0.00-Bone 4.03E-05 25.0 0.00 Remainder 4.41E-05 25.0 0.00 CEDE 4' .19 E- 0 5 TEDE 1.31E-04 100.0- 0.00
, o l
l 'RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION -1.1 JULY 1994 L
ODCM SOFTWARE. VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM-DATABASE VERSION.1.1 January 1995
- V.
f-1.
1-2
r 4
5
.x -
j .. '
l TABLE 3.3-1 (continued) i DRESDEN STATION UNIT.TWO:
i 10 CFR 20' COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/97LTO 12/31/97 l'
CALCULATED 04/13/98' l
- 1. E1O CFR 20.1301 (a) (1) Compliance !
Total Effective Dose Egivalent, mrem /yr 3.06E+00-
) 10 CFR 20.1301- (a) (1) limit mrem /yr 100.0
% of limit 3.06 1
Compliance Summary - 10CFR20
.lst .2nd 3rd 4th' %' of Qtr Qtr -Qtr Qtr Limit ,
TEDE 9.19E-01 '5.51E-01 6.79E-01 9'.12E-01 3.06 4
.RESULTS BASED UPON: 0- ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I.
iD LO u
, I - 29
! s N/~Y TABLE 3.3-1 (continued) 1 DRESDEN STATION UNIT TWO 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD CF ASSESSMENT 01/01/97 TO 12/31/97 CALCULATED 04/13/98
- 2. 10 CFR 20.1301 (d)/40 CFR 190 Compliance e-s
'(,) Dose (mrem)
Limit (mrem)
% of Limit Whole Body Plume 2.83E-03 (DDE) Skyshine 3.06E+00 Ground 2.31E-03 Total 3.06E+00 25.0 12.24 !
Organ Dose Thyroid 1.13E-03 75.0 0.00 (CDE) Gonads 1.02E-03 25.0 0.00 Breast 9.53E-04 25.0 0.00 Lung 1.04E-03 25.0 0.00 Marrow 9.73E-04 25.0 0.00 Bone 9.51E-04 25.0 0.00 Remainder 1.14E-03 25.0 0.00 CEDE 1.04E-03 ,
I TEDE 3.06E+00 100.0 3.06 l 1
RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 i ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 l ; i 1-M
l
(:
- TABLE 3.3-1 (continued) i l
l1 a
l DRESDEN STATION UNIT THREE 10 CFR-20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT- J q
' PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01'/97 TO 12/31/97 {
CALCULATED'04/13/98 '
- 1. 10 CFR 20.1301 (a) (1) Compliance Total Effective Dose Eqiv'alent, mrem /yr 4.96E-01' j J
10 CFR 20.1'301 (a) (1) limit mrem /yr 100-0 i
~~ M
% of limit 0.50 Compliance Summary - 10CFR20 1st 2nd 3rd 4th- % of Qtr Qtr .Qtr Qtr Limit TEDE- 9.23E-02 1.09E-02 2.02E-01 1.91E-01 0.50.
i.
RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 y ODCM' DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 NL
)
1 - 31 i ..
I T l -
.I s
1 TABLE 3.31 (continued) )
DRESDEN STATION UNIT THREE '!
)
i 10' CFR' 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT l PERIOD OF. ASSESSMENT- 01/01/97 TO 12/31/97 i CALCULATED 04/13/98 1
- 2. 10 CFR 20.1301 (d)/40 CFR 190 Compliance Dose Limit .% of-
[ (mrem) (mrem)' Limit
.Whole Body Plume 4.47E-03
,, (DDE) Skyshine 4.79E-01 ,
Ground 1.04E-02 Total 4.94E-01 25.0 1.98 Organ Dose Thyroid 4.52E-03 75.0 0.01 (CDE) Gonads 1.62E-03 25.0 0.01 Breast 1.53E-03 25.0 0.01 Lung 2.18E-03 25.0 0.01
' Marrow. 1.57E-03 25.0 0.01 Bone 1.54E-03 25.0 0.01 Remainder. 1.88E-03 ,
25.0 0.01 CEDE 1.81E-03' TEDE 4.96E-01 100.0 0.50 LRESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.-1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January.1995
! p.
[v I- 32 .
L o j t
n ,
s ,
Ld TABLE 3.4-1 I 2RES0!M STAil01 - UMli 1 -l L .WAltrJW 00$i$ RESULTING FROW AIRBORNE RELEAS!! I
- ,. .PERIODOFRELEASE: Octcher1-Otetster11- -YEAR:119:
TYPi0F0015' CURRE41 PERIOD CURRE'lli QUARTER THIR0 QUARTER $!COMO CJART!i FIRSTGUARTER- ANN'JAL
~
'GAWWAAIR(erad)- 0.000E+00ln.) 0.000E+00t M ) 0.000!+001 N ) .0.000E+M! h l 0.000E+00( N ) 0.000!+00(N.)' 1 BETAAIR(aradi 0.000E+00(Ni 0.000!+001N) 0.000!+00( N ) 0.000it00( h 1- 0.000!+00( N ) 0.000!+001 N )
VdOLE BODY (srtil 2.710E-06(ESEl 2.710E-05(ESE) 1.210E-05(SSE)-2.660E-0!(!!)'3.620E05(ESE) 4.574!-05(ESE)
SKl4(area) :3.180E-05(ESil 3.180E-06(ESE) 1.420E-05l$$E)l 3.130i-0!( Sil 4.230E-05(ESE) . 5.35tE-05(E55)-
CRGAM(arasi 5.250E-0B(ESE) 5.250E-08tESE) 2.450E-Of(151) 4.120E-0!(134) 1.570E-Of(ESE) 3.756E-Of(151)
CRiflCALPERSCRG TA Lh TA-LN TA-1,X TA L1 TA-LN :TA LN i
COUPLIANCESTATUS 10CFR50 APP.'i 10CFR50 APP.1 TYPEOFDOSE QUARTERLY OBJECTIVE 10F APP. I YEARLY OBJECilVE 1OfAPP.I GAWWAAIR(stad) 5.0 .00 10.0 .00
.BETAAIR(arad) 10.0 .00 20.0 .00 {
i VHOLEBODY(arts) 2.5 .00 5.0 ' .00
. SKIN (erts) 7.5 .00 15.0 .00
. ORGAll (arts) 7.5 .00 15.0 .00 CRITICALPERSOR-ORGA1 (TA-LN) (TA '.N) 1 CRii!CALORGANS: 84:8055, LV:llVER, IB:10TAL BODY, TH: THYR 010, K0:K10llEY, L5:tUXG.' G!:Gl-ll!
CRlilCAL PER50X: AO: ADULT, TA: TEENAGER, CH:CHILO, IN:lRFAXT
' Otta of cliculation:- 4/.7/1998 1.
v D '
1:
I - 33 I
m TABLE 3.4-1 (continued)
ORES 0!N STAi!0N - UNIT 2
]
l WAXIV"W 00SES RESuli!NG FROW AIRBORNE RELEASIS
]
PERIOD 0FRELEASE: October 1 - Oteteer 11 YiAR: !!i?
TYPEOFDOSE ' CURRENT PERIOD CURRENT QUARTER THIRD CUARTER SEC0 0 04JARTER FIR $i QUARTER AhrJU.
1 GAWA AIR inadi 2.020E 031 E 1 -2.020E-03( E 1 1.015E-03(NH) - 1.642E-05(NH) 2.2555-03(ESE) - 4.6575-03(ESE)
BETAAIRintad) 1.530E-04(ESE) -3.530E-04(ESil 2.790E-04(111) 2.555E-05(Xn) 5.000E-04(ESE)-1.0t!!-03(ESE)
HOLEE00Y.(arts) 1.430E-01($$E) 1.430E-03(SSE) 7.900E-04(SSE) 9.550E-04(SE) 1.54fE-03(ESEl' 4.053E-01(SSE)
SK!!i (ates) 1.803E-03(SSE) 1.601E-03(SSE) 1.066E-031SSE) 1.140E-03!-$51-2.233E-03(ESE) 5.22tE-01($$5)
ORGAN (arta) 8.050E-05(ESE) 8.050E-05(ES!) 6.933E-05(151)' 2.60!E-05(NH) 1.078E04(ESE) 2.4t5E04(E55) {
CRITICALPERS-0RG CH-TR CH-TH CR-TR TA-LN CH-TH C8-TH COMPLIANCESTATUS 10CFR50 APP.I 10CFR50 APP.1 TYPE OF 005E QUARTERLY OBJECilVE 10F APP.1 YEARLY OBJECilVE % OF APP. I I
'GAHAAIR(arad) 5.0 . 04 10.0 .05 -
J BETAAIR(arad) 10.0 .00 20.0 .01 HOLEBODY(arts) 2.5 .06 5.0 - .01 SKIN (arts) 7.5 .02 15.0 .03 ORGAN (arts) 7.5 .00 15.0 . 00 CRITICALPERSON-ORGAN (CRTX) .(CR-TR)
CRii!CALCRGANS:BN: BONE,LV:llVER,IB:TOTALBODY, TR: THYROID, K0:K!0NEY, LN: LUNG, G1:Gl-LLI CRiilCAL PERS0ll: A0:A0VL1, TA: TEENAGER, CR:CHILO, IN:!NFAXi Oatt of'calculatlon: : 4/ T/1998 O
x_-
I - 34
Lh.
- V . TABLE 3.4-1 (continued)
ORIS0iNSTAi!04-Ux!T-3 l WAllWUV00$ESRESUlilNGFROWAIR30RXER!LEAsiS PERIODOFRELEASE: October 1 - Dictatar 31 YEAR:'titi !
L TYPEOFDOSE CURRENT PERICO CURRENT QUARTER ' THIR0 CUARTER $!COMO QUARTER FIRSTQUARTER AWJA'.
'l GATH AIR (arad) 2.0205-03( E ) 2.020E-03( E ) 1.0155-03(RM1) 7.642E-Oi(WI) 2.2555-03lES!) 4.667E-03!!SE) 1 l
SETAAIR(stad) 3.530E-04(ESE) 3.530E04(!$E) 2.790E-04(151) 2.555E-0!!n1) 5.000E-04(ESE) ' 1.013!-03(ES!)
E0LEBODY(sten) 1.430E-03($$5) 1.4305-03(555) 7.900E-04($$E) 9.550E-01(!!) 1.541E-03(ESE) . 4.05!!-03($S2)
Stts(aren) 1.803E-03($$El_l.8095-03($10) 1.056E-03($$El 1.140E-03( Si) 2.2355-03(ESE) 5.2212 03(S$5)
CRGAN(ern) 8.050E-05(ESE) 8.050E-05(ESE) 6.933E-05(ISI) 2.608i-05( n s) 1.018E-04(ESE) 2.415i-04(ESE)
CRITICALPERS-0R3 CH-TK CR-TH CH-TH TA-l.% CH-TH Cd-id l
COVPLIAX0ESTATUS 10CFR50 APP.I 10CFR50 APP.I
'[b} TYPE OF DOS! QUARTERLY OBJECTIVE 5 0F APP. I YEARLY OBJECTIVE 50FAPF.!
GAMMAAIR(stad) 5.0 .04 10.0 .05 BETAAIR(stad) 10.0 .00 20.0 .01 H0LE B00Y (eren) 2.5 .06 5.0 .08 Skit (urn) 7.5 .02 15.0 .03
. ORGAN (arn) 7.5 .00 15.0 .00 CRITICALPERSOR-0RGAR (CR-TH) '(CW-in)
Crit!CALORGANS:B4: BONE, LV:llVER, IB: TOTAL BODY, TH: THYR 010, K0:110 HEY, LN:1.URG,G!:Gl-LLI
- CRITICAL PER$05: AO:A0VLT, TA: TEENAGER, CH2 Chit,0, IN:!NFANT Maximum Offsite Values (pCi/m31 Cateofcalculation:- 4/7/1998 Iodine 4.11E-04 i Particulate Matter 1.48E-M
.C Data Recovery
[ (priority parameters) 99.6 %
l I - 35
FIGURE 5.01
.. 1 a
1 i- /
- 4
,, j Ceco Row u g5 3 to2 2 116 1 116-2 7 gapt tot t 3 10125 , S M Cemetery Road . Towpath Road 4 N i e 1041 resden Island W e 104 2 and Dent ggMSg /f i,
, r ,i
- - e 114111515 ' 141 M, } m 114-2 115-2 5 e 142 k
DME
, $ Dresden Nuclear 3 mity Power Station O }", 1 \
yearr s%
1 O Coo *e Co
= ,
Jottet
'd PrefrieW Q R **4 Yacht 15 808 t b '
g '
E Club p State 110 3 m m 110 4 S g,g l M General Eectric Ca.
gas.: 4, a 107 2 l E \ 35 j tra '*** I*I $
- e. - a , 108 2s ;;
e n
1 2 miometen f
. l l
E TLD DRESDEN STATION UNITS 1,2 & 3
, INNER RING TLD LOCATIONS O 1 I - 36
l i
O ricuses.o.2
/
I \ l
. % 4 4
/ -
" U f' f //
t 2
m .s 215
- : 2 .2
/ 20>1 d p.
2,42
- j. /
as
( '2012 l 2161 E
.: e.i N -l 1 40 213 1 .
e 206 2 jg sos.
Se W3
@4 212 3e ._ i Morris It12 e e 25"[
211 1 e 210 1 l a 208. '
O == ":
W 7 d Coal City - t
- %q
\
e , ,o .
, i . .
o so so mm.im
I - 37
I FIGURE 5.0 3
/ =
d 4
g K' 4
/
x
[
' -
- 15 12 T
Y !
I l
A[
13
, 21f 16
- l .. 2 ,2..e y i l 8 d 11 ed 10 '7 g . ,
- Morris
- I g ta. its ,
9N &p
. i Coal City i O
h %q#*' eg 8 i i
? __ ? '? "'*
? . '? .
" * *
- DRESDEN STATION '
UNITS 1.2 & 3
. 1
- At Samonng Locat" FIXED AIR SAMPLING AND TLD SITES
, l 1
D41 Onsite Sianon 1 011 Morns D42 Onsite Stanen 2 D 12 Lisbon D 03 Onsite 51 anon 3 D 13 Minook4 D44 Collins Road D 14 Channahon D46 Will County Road D 1.5 joliet D47 Clay Products D 16 Elwcod D48 Prairie Parks D 17 Wilmington D49 Coal City D-45 McKinley Woods Road i D 10 Coose Lake Village {
l i
i O
1 - 38 ,
U
l FIGURE 5.0-4 ,
%)
- 1 1
/
3 CF.Co Row 5
.p _
j'
, Cemetery l
, Road Towpath Road M N 26
', Dresden Island Loca b end 0am j',* W#g C #/' e D.
35D.20* .
H,
- D.21 j D.19 4 DME 5 Dresden Nuclear $ '
3 Power Station D 50 e l . .
c.18 e N
~. .
l', 'f I
~
O f@@ sec
=c er I .,2, Ig s
\~
.- e.'
=3 m,.i o c 5 9
j]
]- a t li
? 'E I" '
? !
DRESDEN STATION UNITS 1,2 & 3 NEAR STATION WATER SA.\lPLE LOCATIONS 9 Water l D 15 Inlet Canal D 19 Discharge Unit 1 D 20 C ttharge Unit 2/3 D 21 tilinois Faver at EJ&E RR Bridge D 23 Thorsen Well D-28 Dresden Pool at Illinois River D 35 Dresden Lock & Dam I - 39 i
l O . FIGURE 5.0 5 d N 4
g N 4 f
v#
f
- * #e e
Y \.
= '
j N
,.. , ^
_D 34A <*
D.22 o.34 pews"# .
_ g Morris d * "'
(ay a s25 Coal City +,
- +
l e D-26 16 miles 8
' uw
_ _ _t ,
- :o no % DRESDEN STATION
- UNITS 1,2 & 3
' ~
MILK SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND MORE a gax DISTANT WATER SAMPLE LOCATIONS D-22 Illinois River at Morris Water Works D 25 Vine Biros Farm D-26 Halpin's Dairy D-34A Cooling Lake . Dresden Road Crossing D-34BCoolingLake CountyLineCrossing O
I-40 L
l 1
l (n) TABLE 5.0-1
~
t i fs Dresden Station w I t k Radiolopkcl Environ, mental Monitoring Locations
.j g
.)
q ) j 3 c
.g 2 -
8 g
e C 9 .c j
- f. a 6 m
- df-
- p @ ?
e
.-< H U E 3 2 e $ 0 D-01 Onsite Station 1 0 0 . . . .
D-02 Onsite Station 2 0 0 . . . .
D-03 Onsite Station 3 0 0 . . . . .
D-04 Collins Road 0 0 . .
D-06 Will County Road 0 0 . . . .
D-07 Clay Products 0 0 . . .
D-08 Prairie Parks 0 0 . .
D-09 Coal City 0 0 . .
D-10 Goose Lake Village 0 0 . . . .
D-11 Morris 0 0 . . .
D-12 Lisbon 0 0 . .
D-13 Minooka 0 0 . .
D 14 Channahon 0 0 . . .
D.15 Joliet 0 0 .
D-15 Elwood 0 0 . .
D-17 Wilmington 0 0 . . .
D-18 Inlet Canal . . 0 . .
D-19 Discharge - Unit 1 . 0 .
D-20 Discharge - Unit 2/3 . . 0 . .
D-50 Inlet - Unit 2/3 . 0
/~ D-21 Illinois River at EJ&E RR Bridge
. . . . . . t Q] D-22111inois River Upstream of Morrh Water Works D-23 Thorsen Well
. O 0 .
I 1
. . . . . . 0
. D-25 Vince Biros Farm . . . . 0 . .
D-26 Halpin's Dairy & Dam . . . . . 0 .
D-27 Dresden Lock
. . . . . . O D-28 Dresden Pool at Illinois River . . . 0 0 . . .
D 34A Coolin Lake , Dresden Road Crossing . . . 0 .
D-34B Coolin Lake , County Line Crossing . . . . 0 .
D-35 Dresde k & Dam .
. . . . O D-46 DesPlaines River, Upstream . . . 0 . . . .
D-45 McKinley Woods Road 0 0 . . . .
CENSUS Dairy Residence .
Cattle ',
j
?
\)
I- 41 l
- _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ I
y-d TABLE 5.0-2 DRESDEN STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS
- 1. AIR SAMPI I~RS Distance Direction Sector Site Codea Location Inulesl D-01 Onsite Station 1 0.6 NW Q D-02 Onsite Station 2 0.3 NE C
' D-03 Onsite Station 3 0.4 S J D-04 _ Collins Road .
0.9 W N D-06 WillCounty Road 1.4 SE- G -l D-07 Clay Products 2.0 S J D-08 Prairie Parks 4.0 SW L:
D-09 (C) CoalCity 7.5 S J D-10 Goose Lake Village 3.8 SSW K
' D-11 (C) Morris 8.0 WSW M D-12 (C) Lisbon 10.0 NW D-13 Q Minooka 4.5 N A D-14 Channahon 3.5 NE C D-15 (C) Joliet . 12.5 NE C D-16 (C) Elwood 8.0 E E 1 \-
~ D-17 (C) Wilmington 8.0 SE G D McKinley Woods Road 1.5- ENE D
- 2. ILIh
- a. Same as No.1.
- b. SpecialTLD Locations Distance ' Direction Sector Site Code (miles)
Inner Ring
- D-101-1,2 1.0 N A D-102-1,2 1.3 NNE B D-103-1,2 1.2 NE C D-104-1,2 1.5 ENE D' D-105-1,2 1.4 E E D-106-1,2 0.9 ESE F D-107-1,2 1.3 SE G D-108-1,2 1.9 SSE H D-109-1,2 0.8 S J D-110-3,4 0.8 SSW K .
D-111-1,2 0.6 SW #
L a Control (rere;ence) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.
l I-42 l
l V. TABLE 5.0-2 (continued) l' DRESDEN STATION 1
. RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTALMONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS '!
i
- 2. ILR:i
- b. Special TLD Locations (continued)
' Distance Direction . Sector Site Code . (miles)
Inner Ring (continued)
~l D-112a-1,2 WSW 0.8 - M l D 113-1,2 0.9 W N ,
D-114-1,2 1.0 WNW P D-115-1,2
')
0.8 NW -Q 1 D-116-1,2 1.0 NNW 'R Outer Ring D-201-1,2 4.5 N 'A' I
/ '
D-202-1,2 5.0 NNE B D-203-1,2 - 4.5 NE C D-204-1,2 5.0 ENE D D-205-1,2 4.2 E E D-206-1,2 3.5 ESE F D-207-1,2 4.5 SE G D-208-1,2 5.0 SSE H D-209-1,2 5.0 S J D-210-1,2 4.8 SSW K D-211-1,2 5.0 SW L D-212-3,4 6.0 .WSW M D-213-1,2 4.5 W N D-214-1,2 4.5 WNW P D-215-1,2 5.1 NW Q D-216-1,2 4.8 NNW R f
- 3. MILK i Distance Direction Sector Site Codea Location (miles)
D-25 (C) ' Vince Biros Farm 11.5 SW L D-26 (C) Halpin's Dairy 16.0 S J l
a : Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.
(' G(~n I- 43 J
TAB' E 5.0-2 (continued)-
. DRESDEN STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS
- 4. GROUND /WELL WATER .
Distance Direction Sg.ch Site Codea- Location (miles)
D Thorsen Well 0.7 S.
D-35 J !
Dresden Lock & Dam 0.5 . NW Q.
- 5. SURFACE WATER Distance Direction Sgetgr Site Code - Location (miles)
D-21 lilinois River at EJ & E 1.0 WNW P Railroad Bridge D-22 Illinois River Upstream of Morris . 8.0 WSW M Water Works
\
t 6. LAKE WATER Distance Direction Sector
.' Site Code Location (miles)
D 28 Dresden Poolat Illinois 0.5 NW Q River
. D-34A Cooling Lake, Dresden 2.6 S .J Road Crossing
- D-34B Cooling Lake, County 3.0 SSE H Line Crossing
- 7. COOLING WATER '
Distance Direction . SgCtGI Site Code . Location (miles)
. D-18 Inlet, Unit 1 At Station - -
4- D-19 Discharge, Unit 1 At Station - - .
D-20 Discharge, Unit 2/3 At Station - -
D-50 Inlet, Unit 2/3 At Station, -
- a Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" af ter site code. All other locations are indicators.
O l
I l - 44
I' 3-I
_- ;-TABLE S.0-2 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION
- RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS - >
'8. FJS11 '
Distance Direction Sector
- Site Codea Location (miles)
D-28 - Dresden PoolofIllinois 0.5 NW River Q
DSP-46(C). ' DesPlaines River, Upstream - 0.9 ~ E E
- 9. SEDIMENT Distance. Direction Sector
' Site Code - Location - (miles) _
D-27 ' Dresden Lock & Dam 0.5 NW .Q
.r u) a Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site 'code. ' All other locations are indicators.
e
- O- i I- 45
s ru ao ef ei lpo e
((
/_
lp s
e mnh ai ot st r ae h nv nrone ne e pc r hibn so.
st r e a lpp r
e lpy .
arf wt i yi mlr m
a n nr ia et t
e dwiatro t v
i a men a r at e sr s cr d
t e na e iints zt ynt s o ra u
le boucq ec ne i
s lat niiis oaih gt d l
iei br"s. iaQ l
akr f
r ser oga a sdrm f lad .
a rad e nor ao o rea a ly r
k s e n gr n f e e r
c ts fr aem es e t e ar e r
a d icaa vl . a indi s n gd nR s ss t
r a
S E m n i pe cn l e ea se pr si n de" nl s D' et u S R e a e o h go i m at va e a pl d r e Ls Tl l Q -
Y atsnehal emie t t nt lp -
t fA d L
A i
s n
o ioXia s
Se o ascl dc slums ds eea s e r it ssr n
af a m a
o.
ss a
e r
N mdee loldf e n t t r s s ie r see ud n l
A i
la mep e rl p f iee t l
l so i t
e u laf a a a cem s
aedaml D n rl e f l ota O Getxh as Ffimf irf n rau n wco l l
N e OFic O Tl A -
A N ,
O I
T s ly C yis c y r ly ly E nl lyy ey kly r r -
L e a kk l
tl e ly e e L rk t t u n ee ee ae e k e
r a
r a
O qA e ue w e u u C r f F o WW QW i B W Q Q E -
L P
M e t . t . s r
)
d A a ess oo v. o e S, is te gl I -
t a
f s B naa d- c u N M oy a ne a a i i
n O AR el pa s
s ote cmm rhmm 1 at n ti m n d
n t
yn 3 s m i i x aa e a I rl m n 1 a e o T G TA GF EGG -
TM G G r
(
c A T RO I
s a
S P n 2- o
,D 0 N E G s it a
5 E
D S R E
N I
O ny oc n s
u on k
oee s
u nw o
k e
e ly ly l
c o
r e
R o L
B D T I
N it c
e e uq iauiw nt t ra ui o nt it aw t r
e r
t r
e r
ht o
A ne r rt l
O loer o po ne o por a
u a
u l
l T CF Cof Q Q A M
L A
T d
a o
Cof d
e o
N E ds ad R
l e
g a i te c
s M te Ro oo s l
r N i S datyW t s ck Vi t e
O ur e n n f a =
R o ny Ru e daya k o o g -
I 123 oPtL ah dg ka t
n V sol n r i s i C"
N eee P eC ei n o n oin R "
n t t tinCi irl r a E o d iiisssl l lK l yi aaroo a o s roonte om e y L nnnoic osihlrb n ai wli n i OOOCWM le i
l t
a CPCGMLMCJEW i
ol n b A c F I d
C o r e _
I t a ~
to G e )) ))) n O N ) CC CCC .
2,2,2,2,2,2, e =
L a d 5 C (( ((( 1 s 111111 d O e n 123464 (01234567 78911111111 1 1
a - - - -
e =
d a - - - - - - d 123456 r =
I D o le s s e 000000 a C te DDDDDD DDDDDDDDDDD a a m 111111 s
=
A i s
i F e e a D n =
R n r m m S o
'a a a i O . _
. t S S a b a c
l o
)
e .
a s g c i e n d t a in er e e M el n e lp -
rcu f
e n r e n m n er lp oi t oi ai (
br bd Sa r D l m iP r a r io r o _
iT L r a A A t
A T t
n S o -
C
, V 1 2
3
- 4. " _
c
/
, ( Los
)
n
/a L ie CSp g C i/
- 5. n p _
0i z 5 ly : a r
s e Dr - .
kr t r LG L(
DL _
S E
S a
m e Q a
u le s
L s
e Y R d p l L a p .
e m A r a m a -
N t s s s _
A e s
l l
l l
a a D l n n N lA O O A _
N _
O I
T s C yi s c y ly r y E nl e l L e a t ly ht L r u n a k e n O qA e u e o C r f Q W M E F o L
P _
)
M s A r d o _
S, is t
e
_ f a u NM o y s i c
n el m. d i
t O AR I
pa yn m 1
3 1
3 i n
n T G TA G 1 1
e r
(
o c TA R O 1 I a
s
/. S P n o
_(C 2 N G 0 E l
i t
a 5 D N I h g
ir p o c
S R n y l -
E E ly cA L R B D O
T I
N iocn t
c e le uq t r
e :
ktbt u :hhgu o
rry l ht o
r e
A r
a lyh eyon e h m or T O l
oer u ea c o t oh l
l CF A M Q WMOMNT L e A d _
T o c
_ N e E t M e m r is t
a r N i S Fmr e O
t f
R g sa a I n oF r "
V i R i s C
N r Bei'n E n e cp "a L io t
t u inl a y A raa O VH b
_ C I l d
e
_ G t
o
_ 2,2,2,4,2,12,2,2,2,2, 2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,4,2,2,2,2, n O 11131 e L a - - - - a-1111- - - 1111111111131111
- - d O e 7890123456 1234567890123456 I d 0001111111 0000000001111111 )) e r
_ D o 1111111111
- 2222222222222222 CC a A C D ((
s R 56 n 22 - - io b DD t a
k r
_ )
e a ) c d
i d n e e e r
u e M n f e
_ l e Dtn i
(
r p Lo k l m T (c l
i o r
., j
\
S a
M C
t n
o 4 5 a
_ . .Q .
3 _
c,O ly ly _
k k w e
_. e _
w w f f o o ly te e n it s is s o _
k r o p o s .
a p n _
S m . . . m m . . io .
E e sss o o ss s t
S R eee c c ee e r Y lppp ll lpp l lp o
p
_ ly ly _
L A mmm aaa ht ht mm m le
_ sss n s. n s. aa a b
_ N oe oe ss s i A llll l laaa mp mp l l ll ll aa l
l a
d e
D nnn nm nm nn n n N OOO Osa Os a OO O O A
N O
I ly _
T s la C ys i lyyy l u r lrr ly E c y ly ly n L nl eee ht ht lyy ly n l a
L e a t t t rrr kk l
k a u u n aaa n n ee e i n
O o uuu o ee qA e m C e QQQ M e n E
r f F o M WW W S A
_ L
_ P _
)
M a . . . s d A ha lpt t
o s
t o aos t a t o
t o
. r o
s e s t e S, I I eI t
e s s t a
oyis I I u f .
NM ABm ss u a
u a
-n Ba sm B a a ic _
in el s n n d O AR pa ss u u s s u u n t I yn ooi r ri t
r a u
a u om ra o r
u u i n T G TA CGT G a a e o A O G GG G G G r a -z (c T R s _
S n
'/ P 3'Q 2
0 NE G io t
a 5 DS R N I ny ly l
a l c
o E E ly u -
_ O iocn y e L R T t c e r
e ly ly ly n n
l ht B D I N e u q t
r k k k k ly a
l a
u o A O l
loer a
u e
e e
e e e e e
i m n l T CF Q e ma n l A
M W W W W S A L s e e A E mk a r n t s
r d
T m eo e ty p o a & d n 3 m c N Ee g stW r s D J e a rgou E / U, e
& pr 12 r D t is M e tdai Ute t
a e r D,i t t f re &
s,inCng loev ii N r r nn3 r oiv e s it S
kll ce r a l es vi k e O eB eW UU/ oiR c t PoRk ok s f Pors R oW ivd v arao 1
i e, e,2 t o a I
l Rao is Ri r sLCL r t n rr ggni e s l V nn ee sr e o gd g C ni nin n C" sr e oia e N n dss r ioi l
a oio dnnane iolin U,h ha a U, dslip nl ds
~
E o eo sl i
l t cct a inM i
L i rh lnR i
el ooRo oL r I leiilss e el s r I e r e y :
A t
a c DT l I
!f I
I o D C C n IDDI n D D D b -
C I L o d e
t
_ G o O n L a e d
O I d e
) e
) ) r D o C C C )
a A C ( A B4 ( ( C
( s 53 1 2 8 4 8900 8 7 n R 32 2- 2- 2- 3 3- 6 1125 2 2- o DD D D D D D DDDD D D 4-D i
t a
c
_ l o
)
_ l r r e a l e e e c i t a r t a n d
e W r W e ts r e
M / e t a W em e dt na e W g n f e
e c n ii u l r uW a lp (
o f e i ede r
m r r
u k lo h oS l
o a G a o s h r S L C i
F S t
n) S n o
C 6 7 8
. . 0 1 9 1 1 a
' m c w
w
^
n m o n -
s s s o s
k a a a r
a e s e e S s s E m g g g S e n n n Y R iz i L a z a iza r r r A g g g
- N g.
n g g A i n n r ir i r
D u u u N D- D D A .
N O
I T s h
C yi s cy ly y ly ly E nl l
a l
l l L ea a a l L u u u a un n n n u O qA e n n n n C A A y n E Fo rf t A A
^
L n r s. %
P g uoe o s c 5
7-
. f M .n ct r nu y f oo:0--e yedmeo ri l it A y ot n n S, s bru bcr o gs '- o :e rnr5 p deou%
t oyis noo co femi t s f
a nf ael y. o NM el iodt icr enlab ora tom spr n c h l
df fr ra ca0 a p5 O AR pa yn t
a o leu n e. t a eiul ft i
nks eo2% m5 .
I T G r t eraq i e r reatl e r a e g eo nd a e
r a,t T. A ri n movoi n m gm rcu r r arf ,5 A O T i noie i ud u d
a uhti md%7 S RP ud qude uif n s n rh qe t s tsot o5>
Qy NG E
n Eaet E ui a o a
b.
gt I
nf e a e
P F P ab efso<o e 2r D
S R NI ny
- c. 1 2 3 E
R O ioc n D T I
t ce N le uq -
O loer - - -
M CF L
A -
T .
N A E %.
M te _
N S i -
O m R . s I
s 5 le h V
e i N
l m m E n im te o 2 f 5 L h n o A a c o s i t t e p C
I L o ys li d e u G a m i t
s s 5 r O d n o l
s o L u t e t c
O e o s ir e -
)
I D
i a b le ia s _
6 d A C i te im d t
1 e R S 2 A l
l u a a
i n b c .
i n _
t m n s s o u s la
(
c a n e m e 2-i d
e Ce Ain c n
e s ts 0 M U s h ed su e lc a isn 5 r lp t i ee y E L m mM a NeRC - .
a L rV B A
T S
2 1
~;e b
_ 3(v f
oin rt s e
t
- eul bou mr -e s 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u nR NoN .
_ s o noang e l
e e e r i ea tna oc t
an N
n o
n o
n o
D~
L L
D D L
L L
L D
L o e
n e
n o
e n
o
- CoMR N N < < A L
< N N N L
Y R
9 4
2- -
A
. 0 M 5
)
M 7 3 7 a
- 3) 8 U 2 9 ne 1
/0 3 ) )
S 9 a g 3 1
/ 1 Y ena 10 /
m.
1 _
_ - 1 t
(5 - 1 L
R 0 e t r s e MR 61
- - (
6 3
(
E 1 r h n 20 7 3
- 0. 0 T 0 a ia g 1 2 R 5 u 0(
A .- O HeM U ot s ht Q N1 t i
wrlye M ke d ntr dN a kc Q lJ A c o ioaa or r l e r _
R oi r a n Ro o o Wo G De P tcO o s c t l ,tc
.t O g A it line nme de a S,
. e c R n I
a c l S - - - - - - ky S, P i o lo W, sD W -
e b.S t
r rd 3-G o L C, i DnN i N
I p
e t o9 m 5 ai Tm 3 s R R 3- m 27 e 5 n D0 5 D0
- s
. ~U
( 0 e O o D e T i t
0 ht l I a n 2 b N t is e S o r a O r in )e a T ML w e l l
I t
a rs
)
86) 7 3 p
n o t ona o nge /0
)
2
)
2 i A yS,y D e
~
T P t ai 8 7 0- D n D D D / D / d r t. ct a n L L L L L 1 / e N a n t ia e a (3 L L o ( L t E l e
c u
r n u dcMR no 41 20 < < N L L L
< 6 L 1
(
5 a
ic M u G o I l
- 0. 0 0(
7 1 3 2
d n
- N N y(_C . i s
O R
n it .
n t l o -
V lue Fica I
j it c
. N r a r
E.
D fo 4 0 F F n D 1 0- 0 A iyo t i L 0 1 5 0 0 0 5 0 ly di l t
a L 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 4 0 2 n G ic c o O Flao 0 t
s _
- L f n e :_
O oe I 8 6 5 6 6 m _
D ma 7 3 e r
A 2 2 2 u s
R N a s e a m _
f m le dos - m b ~
nre Ma a a esy CG t
- c. c c
ebl e e d a e pman a p S
p Der a h t
e TyuA B t
e a S
a 4 7 Oir u t
e lp d N s m 3 3 eq B A m n s 1 1 m 1 1
ht e s s u o o m 3 3 m s s R s o
s o
i d
C r a G
1 1
a C C O r r i t
r s e
I i G G G T a b
e g -
s e n e n r a t
a i
) e r r e ) l3) d3o )
t a) e) d lppi ets u c m l m L WL taL n m yn i/ k / / / a aTU (
t r
aC i
e/
ni lii MCp ei cC Wi n
- S o Cp r
ap lC a 0 P p i
A r ( b (
i A
r
( f S
r(
u lep W( M e
- '8 l
j j$l l
f e on i eults rt b ou s mr u nR
- e 0 0 G 0 0 0 NoN s
lro n o a nge e
) 2))
ne o ne e 6 19 tn t ai ean a n o o n o
2
/ /5 21 C2oxMR 1
N N N N 1
(
9 1 -
(4 1 4 5 5(1 1
Y 9 R 4 A 40 M 5 M 7 U 3 2
7 a )
S W ne ag 3) 4
)
- 3) )
1 Y I en 1
9
%.r 1
- /7 /
L t
- - /5 R 0 e 1 t e s
Ma R 7 -
(3 1 (9
7
(
E - r h 45- 2 T 0 ut igna 6( 9. 5 0 R 5 5(
A .O He 2 U ot s h M y'
Q N1 it wlre t
M e nt r A kc do io au l
o Q r R oi r n or r o
) G De P tao t o Peovt t c
n nic de OR g t a it a
c eRe S t
e ln1 n
io 4- S e
u n - ds P i o - - si e o W, I t t 0 W, n t r L 8 nt ia 1 K
it G o p Dlr in N 1 US 2S n N o
I .e 8 l i I
D t
a D S. i R R 2 f
m m O(c3- O T
I N
nio t
a s D' o5 0 8
0 s.
e s
e 0 O 5
St i r
e lin )e o ht n
M l t rs e L w I a r a
ble o t on* e ) ) )6 ) p a T Pr A ai ong yS t 9) 6)
D DL D L 34 26 82 n
a m ty, d ct an L /0 T NE ia ea L
/7 7 - /5 6 i e t dc L 8 2-n < < <L 4 -
InL oMR r (3 (4 d M lcu G ou 45 6( 5. 5(.
(7
- 9. 3 t e
a N N ty( C 5 6 (1 ic O n li 1
d R e in I
ds n V e a s
N r F n E D o f io t
L n c A
D r a
C lityo i t
L 1 0 0 0 5 7 L 1 2 F.
G I
icca 5 9 ly O Fa o. n L f 1
o O oe I
ts n
D A
ma 9 9
2 5 8 e 3 3 9 m R N e r
s u s
a a f
m e do s - m m nr aese Ma le C dC c b e bly e e pman S p Der s ta c
Oi a a o e TNyuA a 4 3
7 3 r u eq D t
a t
e D t e
m 1 1 B a d s
- - ht e s s m s R s s m n a C C O o r o m o G G r a G G d
s e -
a d b n e r r e ur). g e
es
) te) aL ta oQ r
t n
a lppi t g/ r myn Wi/ kc R d
&TU eC a n k p B (m a O
(
a( l n
L o
o a )s a C mD e mL aT M G(
- ll
~
~s/...
f e on rtis s eul t b ou s mre unR 0 0 0 0 0 'O 0 0 O 0 O _
NoN _
_ s o na l
r o ng e e e e n n n D D D D DL e e e tat ia a n e o o o L L L L n n n oc a L L L o o o CoMR L N N N < < < L L
< < N N N
_ Y 9
_ R 2 4
A 0 M 5
_ M 7 7 3 9
)
- 3) 8 U a 1
_ S 2- 9 0 1 n
age /0 2
2 Y 5 r en 14 L
R 0 1
t e
r '
ts e Ma R (5 91
_ F. -
a h g n 1 0 _
R l 0 5 u ia 0. 0 0(
He
.O
_ A h M U od Q N2 n t ly t
e iwre M kd nt r dN
- A c oi o ioau a or R r t a n Ro G DeP cO o s c t
O g o it a
n e S
R n l
c i
l P i t o lo W,
- . ^ ' - - - .
r L 4 G o C. i N p t 0 e e m s L
I R n R D.09 e s
,ol5e OT i I t
o ta s ht e
n b N S i o e a O r n r a
T ML e l w I ta i )e t
rs
)
- 8) p 7 82 l
on* in o nge o
A P y S /0 tai 5 D D e D D D D de T r a dn t y, ct an 74 L L n L L D D D N e u n dc ea ia (
0 L L o L L L L L L L t a
E N L L L L L M u l
c r u nL oMR 71 1 0 < < < < < < < < < i c -
G o I
- 0. 0 d N N C 0( n -
O ne y( i R
I d ic it l sL n
o/
V s a N e r F j
it cG a p E D fo 4 r L 0 b 0 F5 A ityno D 1 0 0- 0 5 0 0 0 3
0- 0 0 0 y=
0 +
L 1
C l i
t L 0 1 0
0
/
1 1 2 0 2 1 2 lnD m I
G ica ca 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 oL O
L F lo f
0 0 tsL n e r -
o IO D ma e
8 2 0 0 e r
eb mtco -
A R N 7 6 4 2 1 1 uO s - -
a e ya -
s s a f
a m m mM e; -
dos - - m l nr s e Ma m b L ae c. c.
s a Ma C G a/ -
CG Dd m
. t e bl y e e c e ci eC p pma n a p S S p
e m p Der d t e
TNyuA B t
e a a 4 7 Or ri a S a 4 7 Oi ru d 0 s
s m m 3
1 3
1 e u Cr hq m 3
1 3
1 eq n5 o=
o m 1 1 s
R e - he d D a 3 3 m s t ht m s s t R G
r C
1 1
a C C O a C C O eL I I G O G s a L l .
b ir e p -
s s gA e
t te n )t n n i) e) a -
e ) la) 3 d3 e r r .
l pet s um o )
L w imy r dn be p ic l m k / degd mym t / e n/ l ii hs ig am T_
S aTU ( r i aC P p r C o
i MCp F/ S/i n a v e
p i mC eo -
O C
br (
r ( ( op i
A i
A (p t t
( MN _
o *b _
B =
r
p./L e f _
n o is o
rt t _
eul b ou me u nR r s 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U O O 0 0 NoN s
lor no ang e D D D e e
)
2) 18 tnai eana n e e en e e D
_ t L L L n n n /4 oc C o. M R L
L L N
o N
o N
o o o o no n L L
21 1
(4 1 N N N N <
71 3(
1 1
Y 9 R 4 2
A M %. _
M v 9Z U 2 9 a
ne ag
)
1 ) ) ) )
S 1 1 3) 3) )
Y % 1 en / / / 1 0 1 2 /
MRa 1
L r t s
- - - ( 1
(
1
( - - -
/6 /5 1
(
0 e e 4 2 - 2 _
R 1 'r h 2 9 (1 (1 0 _
E a igna 5 1 4 2 2 6. 5 25 1 T
R % u 5( 5( 2 He A .O od h M U y Q N2n t
t e
iwler M kd nt r kc Q k c
,Q I, l Q A ioau o R
c o oi r t
a L o ,tor r o,toc Wt I J e r o o r,or e g
) G DeP cO o
n o nme c l nme n c Pe vtc ni r
a n W,
de O R g L i
t e a S, e a S, e e eRe S, hcst1 oi 1NPr u n a
c - . - dD s dDs s r S, ds t 4Wo n
P i t
L o ed r W ed r W ohiS, - - - si eoW r n ii a D,U S nt 1
2 ic . t i
t G
N r
o p
D ainN DnN ai Tm DliN 9 t D 5mSe n e 5 m 5 m 3 8I l i 1 a I
3 3 27 2fo m D -
,sd ORT io n R D 0 5 -
D 50 D 0 D 5 0
4 s
e s
,1
?
I N
t t
a s s ht e
0 S o i O r n e n te
) e 5 M i r
e w [
l I
a rs ) ) a L )
l b A o P y S .
t o on 'n g tai e
D DL D 2
/
)
2 2 9)
)
0
)
6) 6)
80 p
a T r d ct an L L 1 / / D DL DL 3
/6 22
/5
/1 in ty, d c ea 1 1 a ia ( L 62 T N E e n oMR L L
< < L
< 4
( (
L L L 2
(
- 2 -
(1 8 - d e
In L u 2 9 (1 c r m < < 1 l
5 2 <
- 5. 5 2. 5 t
M u C o t 1 4 2 5( 5( 321 c a
N N C 6(
1 i
d O
R n e ty( i i n
s V
I N
i "as e
t r F c
i n
o E D fo t c
L a D r A
C I
iynio l
t t
L L
0 1
0 1
0 2 5 4 0
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 2 5 5 7 9
F.
ly G iFca oac O
n o
l s L f .
O oe t n
e D! -
m 6 9 9 2 m .
A a 2 2 2 3 3 5 8
9 e r
R N s a s a
u s
a m e m m f
m m dos nr aeblyes Ma le _
CG mag c b e d c. C e a e
pman p De a e d s t S Oir a h S
p De a a o c e
yuA t lp Oiur D ru e t
a 4 7 t e
t e
TN m 3
1 3
1 eq B A m a 1 1
7 3 r eq B B e
a d
- - h e s s m 1 1 he s s m n m s s t R s s iu - -
a C C O o o m s s t R s s o G G r
C r it T
r G
a C C O G
o r
G o
r G
m a d e
s a _
d b r n ). e g
e r r r
e ur n ta) e) o t rQ e es) e) ta) a r
lppt WL / taL t aL WL g/
mym ei cC Wi /
W/ i gi
/ kR c
a d
n aTU (
S ap ! C
!ep eC nC B (m a f
r( k p h p a )s n S
u W( L a(
o o(
m D_
a e
,i G C m1 aT M
C(
- 7 tWn.
l e
oin f
rt s t eul bour ms u nR e
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No -N s~
l o
r na o ng e e e e t n n D D D D e e e ntai ean o o o n~ L L L L n n n oc a t o o o CoMR l N N N <
L
< < < L t N N N Y 9 4
R 2-A 0
_ M 5
_ M 7 3 7
)
3)
U 2 9 a ne 1 t 2
S 9 ag / G. ) )
1
)
_ Y M.
1 ena 2 1 0- -
1
/ /
1
/
L r t R 0 e 1 t e s MR (2 41
- - - - - 1
(
1
( 1
(
E - r h n 20 9 8 9 0 a T
R 5 u iga 0. 0 4 5 8 2
A .
O HeM 0( 1 U odr ht Q N3 t iwrly e M e ntr nJ kc do o kc Q r k cQ A oir ioau io r l, R t a
t at o o m r
o leJ r G De P cO n o
t c l ,t I ,t Wo O
R g
n l o i t
a Se e S its S, nme nme e
c e
c nc ee t
P i c - - - - - dDa s
S, dDa s S, sS r
G t
r o ni ed W W o S, 5-N o
p l
Om r DnN DnN ed r
hi 0 I R R e 3 4 00 5 a. i 5 ai Tm 3
n -
3- m m 2 07 5 OT i o h)%l D 3, D 5 3-D 5 m
( e b
I N
t t
a s i 0 0 D un a O s o e n ) r -
T ML r i e ) a ll t 7
, p m
I a r s 7 -
A n y.S t
t on a e ai ong / - D D e
)
2
)
2 )
2 i
n T r d ,
ct an 6 7 - L L n D D D / / / d N lea un ty n ia ea dc
( ~ L L' o L L L L L L 1
(
1
( 1
( t e
E 3 N a M c C u u r
o InoMR l 2 0
< < < < < 9 5
8 9 8
ic N N y( C 0 & 4 1 2 d n
O R
ne i t
i s
I d
l i
c n V s a e
io r fF t
N c a
E D o 1 r L n 0 F A ityo D 1 0 0- 0 5 C li ta i
L 1 0 0 0 0 ly L 0 1 4 5 0 I
c c 0 0 0. 1 1 2 2 n G ao 0 o O Fl t s
L f n
O o' e I e m D
A ma 7 7 6 5
3 2 6 e r
6 2 2 2 u R N s s a a e m m dos f
- m le nr e b ae sy c c.
mag a ebl e e Cd t c
pman t a p S
p Der h a
a t e
e yuA e S Oi p t a
TN B s m a
m 4
3 1
7 3
1 r u eq lA B e
m d
n s
o m 3 1 1 s
s
- ht e R
s s
s s u o r a 3 m i d
C G 1
1
- a C C O m m t
i r e I I G G G T s a
b e
g s e e n r n t
e a e' a )
_ i
) t r r et s
) l3 u d3o )
L a) e) d lppi m yn ic m /
l e
m k / WL / taL / n aTU (
t r i n/ i lii MCp ei cC Wi a S PaC p r C o p ( f ap lC lep n
a
( b r( e
(
W(
O-
_ ir r u
- A i
A S M
. a
. .W
- U f e oi n s -
eult rt b oi O 0 O mr u nR a 0 1 '0 .
No N
=_
)
l s )) -
o o ang n e 2) e e e e 26 5 13 n /5 r i ean' tnat oc a o no n o n o
/2 4 2 21 1 -
CoMR N N N N (0 (3 -
t 4. 5 9(
23 1
4(
1 Y 9 4
R 2 .
A M %.
M 7 3 7
)
U a )
n age
- 3) ) .
? 3)
S w 1 &. 15 1 -
/ /
Y
%.r t
en - - - 1 7- /2 1 L
R 0 e 1 t t
s e Ma R 1 (1
4 2 (0
(
6 E
a r h gn 15( 4. 5 1 _
T % u 6 9( 2 R ia He A
U on O
i hMy t
=
Q N3 t iwlre ~
=
M k el c a nt r o
l o Q K A ia o r,r n r o
R ni r ta u Peo o
) C De P cO n o ni vt c t t ea
,i t c
d e O R
g l o' it eRe ds S, lnS t 4eS, 4
u n a - - - si I n P it c eoW 8 a t
1W 1
Oi r
G .o r e n )S p
l din l 1 1
'- S t
n N Dit o
c I
R n R
e 2fI i 8 l m o U n a.
s e
( O o D 50 8 s
IT i
t 0 e 5- a s 0 N S t i o
ht n
O . n ) e 5 M <
m e r a
e L - I t
a r s )
9 )
)
- 6) p l
b A i f y S, t
on*
tai o nge D DL DL 3)6 6) 22 86
/1 n
a T r d ct an L
/
4 7- /9(07- 62 i
T N a n ty e u n ia dc ea L L L 1 (1 8 -
(8 d
te InL o MR E l c r u < < < 15( 0. 5 a
=
M u C o 6 6( 6. 2 6 (1 ic -
N N y(C 1 f
u O
R ne it i r
s li I
V t
se ca n -
F o ~
N r f it c
E D o a r
L A yo n D 0 0 0 7 F.
C it i t L 1 1 2 5 5 ly l
a L 9 I
G icc n a o O F (e s L f t O oe n I
e D
A ma 9 3 9 3 5 2 8 9
m e
r R N u
_ s s a a e
__ m m f - m dos le nr e Ma b ae blys c.
e CG e a Dedr t
e p s c pman S Oiu a a o e yuA a 4 7 t
e t e D t e
TN m 3
1 3 req D B a d
_ m s 1
s
- he tR s
s s s m n o
_ a C C O or o r
m a
C de C C C s
_ d n ).
b a
e r ur g r e t n
le et)s te) ta) oQ r
g/
a r
aL ppi W/ WL g/ kR c d n
m yn O
i i a aTU ( eC nC B (m a S k p a( ip l
a )s n o( a L
C o mD e mL aT M
C(
- f e oin rt 5 euI b o- S'" 0 O 0 0 mr u n R' 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 NoN s
d
- nkm *n eg e n
e n
e n D D D D D e e e
_ t t an o L L L L L n n n
_ na oc ea N o
N N o L L t t L o o o CoMR N N N
_ l Y 9 4
- R 2 _
A 0 M 5
)
M 7 a 3)8 _
U k 2-7 ne ag 1 4
/0 S 0 I W ena 3 0 Y 1 _
5 - - - - - - - - - -
L 0
r e
t s
e MR (4 81 R 1 t
r h n 2 E
T 0 a ga 0. 00
. R 5 n i l e 0(
A oh
.O I ht M U t y Q Ne t I-iwre l
Q _
M kd nt r r o
A c o' ioau e t R oi r a it c G De P tcO n s1 e n y o S o
Oon
__ r O g l i
t
'. a R n a c b , i W, t
m P i t
r o i ta.iN. m 6 GN o
p l o.S p m s s
. u 0 I R
e e s n R 6 si eh 5e OT ita l I o 0 ht ni n t
b N t i s '
e r d -
, a O S o a e r n )
_ . T ML e w
l l
I i
t e
a rs
)
8)8 74 pli nt a i e
-. t tono *nge /0 D D e D D D D D D D dd A n r y.S, T
ai an 8
7 0 L L n L L L L L L L e s d ict (3 o t i dc a e a a a ty L L L L L L L L L N
i e m n noMR 71 < < N < < < < < < < i c1 0
lc n u 20 d -
I L 0. 0 Mt u G o 0( nD N N y(
C i sl y
O R m h li i
t i
n oOnL /
I V s c t c
a N
E e
r F D fo 4 c 0 F a3 r mp 0 5- 3 /5 L D 0 .i tyon 1
0- 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 yC 0 A L 0 1
1
/ 1 1 2 0
2 2 2 l n pD
=
C i it L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 o8
_ I G ficc a
a 0 S 0 s2 LL a 00 r t
O F o l L f c. e O oe I
- r. fob c s to D ma 8 7 6 2 2 i u n c eaO A 4 1 9 1 s
R N s a e m y-s a a mla a m m f m - m le icMa dos nr mag s ba tnl aese a MaC e/
. t
- c. c. Cd c C e bly pman t a S e
p S
e p De Oir m
m a S e
p De Oiru d t cdp ei ed yuA e a a 4 7 ru Gr a t 7 r dnha0 TN D s m m 3
1 3
1 eq he m
}
1 3
1 eq he o54 =
5 s 1 1 -
s R e s s t R eDL D o' m 3 3 m s t m d -
r a 1 1 a C C O ht a C C O s G G I I C O C ad L b nl e a ir g1 p s
s e t n n0 A e n a t i
)
)t e
e) rD- - r e ) la3) d3 o
)
L imy r d s e lppi est um ic I m k/ hs g w degd n a nb o m yn t / e /
ni l
ii nt im S/ a ae i
r MCp i
aTU( aC F/
S P p o C r
p - (
i Cp mC i
ecv r ( b ir
(
(
t op t ( MlooN iA A B o
- b C m.$
A u
m x
m .
e oin f
rt s t eul bou s O mre u nR 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 o m No
.N s ) m
) 2) lo no ang e e e e e e e e e e e 6) 25 1
/6 4
r it an n o n o no n n n n n n n tna oc ea N N N N o
N o o o o o o
/6 6
(3 21 l(0 CoL MR N N N N N 55 1 4 5( 51 1
(
Y 9 4
R 2-A 0 _
M 5 M 7 3 .a )
U 2 % ne ag
) )
1
) 3) 17
)
- 3) I) - m S 9 1
/
1 5
ena 1 / / /3 1 /
Y % - - 1 1 1 /6 t _
L R 0 t
r e
t s'
e .MR
- (
- 6. '
(
0
(
9 21 1
(0
- - - - 3 -
(0
(
6 E 1 r a h 4 7 3 65 6. 5 0 T
R % O u igna f
i e 1 3 6( 5( 2
_ A .
hM<
U oh t t Q N4 iw ;, .
n ;r t
M e k k l, ,
A kd c o io.a ci .
ci ,
l J e r l
o5 o0Q 1 A omQ nmQ Wt r t
R oi r a u l I o P r, or i n o y
) G De. P tcO o
n o n5or nSo r n c net Uon cg ec t r a
de O R . g L de 0, ct de O, ct e e e ivc e t i m sr S, i .
u n t
a - - - e e dRS, s - - -
et a 1 S, 0 .m in G P i t
r c
o sr m e a S, smS e
r a ohiS. es ri DoW lnt yu DDW DDW, Tm b,Sa I
- 2. N.
c l t 0i r a s _
}l N ;
5dN i
8l iln N. .mhis 3- n 5dN 3 m
_ e 3 .
207 I
" R 3n 2f n R i
1 _
3 s mt "fh O o Da Da D Do m 0 4 e s
e si un -
T i t
h 6 I a s isde _
- N t S n i
tnhl _
0 5
O r n )
e e a et i a r
nt e n
_ M i t
t w I ta t
r s ) ) ) pi _
) d d
_ ) 6 )6 ta TAL b
)
_ I y S, to ai n
o "n eg D D D 2
/
2
/ 2
/ 37) 9
/3 D D D 6)
/29 1
2
/0 ine isl
_ r d a n ty ct ia ea an L L L 1 1
( 1
( 71 L L L 4 6- 62 6 - det ia1-T NE L L (
_ L 1 - L t L 1 (0
1 (8
_ l e u n u dcoMR n < < < 6 0 9 (0 < < < 5. 13 t
ad0 e1 M uc r 7 3 5 C o I L 4 1 3 3. 5 S( 7( isc - 2 _
6( -
S diD N N C 1 n 4 'y O ne ty( i 1 l
R i sDn I l a
li c n o yO V s e a i l
. N r F t c nR
_ E D f o aOm r a L
_ A ity io n D L 0 0 0 4 5 0
0 5 0 o 0 5 7 F.L 6 y/0 C 1 1 2 t
L 2 1 t 2 9 l 16a ni2 I
G a oCf po Fa~
O l t s 6 s e5 ane n
L f O oe I
mfo m DA ma 6 2 2 2 9
3 3 9 2 5
5 9 er s R N u s anlac
_ s s a ei a e mlmtn a
. m m ad e
_ f m m e ici
_ dos l b
- nre MaC mag a tn da ae s bly c.
e Ci a c.
e C d e
s t c eh e
pman p Dx h p De o S Oin lp t a a S Oir a D tedi 2-ded6 t t yuA a 1 7 ru e e a 4 7 ru e a a1 TN m 1.
1 3
1 eq A ht e s D
s m u
D s m 3
1 3
1 eq he B
s m nh2 -
m s s R s s i s s s t R s o91 D a C C O o r
o r
t o
r m
a C C O o r
m a d C C C ir T C C C G eDnd s
ad a d b n1 n ). e a - 1 r r ur g8 0 e e t n1 2 e )s t
a) t r
e) t r
e) ta) oQ r
g/
a rDD lpet WL aL/ aL WL kR c d s s m ynpi ei
/
Wi Wi / g/ i am n nn N aTU ( cC lC eC inCp lt ( a n 't eio
' S ap lep kp a )s a t
a f
r( lo(
~
/ S u W( L a(
C o mD mL e
MMLo c
aT G( *b C
- N
' TABLE 5.1-1
Connonwealth Edison Conpany .
t Environmental Site Report V4 for Dresden Page: 1 Date: '30.JAN 98 Gamma Radiation Measured in mR by T'Js Site Description Cuarter 1 Cuarter 2 Cuarter 3 . Quarter 4 1997 1991 1997 1997
- 1. INDICATOR LOCATIONS' a . Alr Samplers (2 TLDs per location) 17,4 2 14.3 2 16.9 2 18.6 2 0 01' CNSITS STATION 1 CNSITE STATION 2 16.2 2 15.1 2 15.7 2 16.7 2 0 02 14.9 2 14.1 2 13.6 2 15.2 2 D 03. CNSITE STATION 3 17.1 2 15.3 2 17.0 2 17.3 2 D.04 COLLINS ROAD 16.6 2 ~ 13.2 2 15.7 2 17.2 2 D.06 WILL COUtr:"t ROAD _
16.4 -2 15.9 2 15.8 2 16.4 -2 D.07 CLAY PRODUCTS 18.0 2 17.5 2 16.6 2 17.1 2 0 08 PRAIRIE PARKS .
16.8 2 16.1 2 16.5 2 17.0 '2 D.10 000SE IAKE VILLACE 15.2 2 14.5 2 14.6 2 15.4 2 D=13 MIN 00KA 16.1 2 15.3 2 14.6 #2 16.3 2 D 14 CHANNAHON 18.9 2 19.3 2 18.1 2* 19.2 2
- D.45 MCKINLEY WOODS ROAD Air Sampler Mean g S.D. 16.7 1.2 15.6 : 1.7 15.9 1.3 16.9 1.2 16.3 1.5 Annual Air Sampler Mean : S.D.
l1
- b. Inner Ring (100 Series)
- 17.5 17.3 17.8 17.8 D 101 1 16.7 17.0 16.9 17.9 D.101 2 18.4 13.2 19.0 19.1 D 102 1 18.1 18.9 18.6 18.8 D.102 2 :
15.4 16.1 16.3 16.3 ;
.D 103 1 15.7 15.1 15.6 17.1 l D 103 2 17.7 17.6 18.5 18.0
.D.104 1 19.1 19.2 18.5 18.3 0 104 2 1
i 18.6 17.5 17.7 19.4
! D 105 1 17.1 16.5 16.7 17.8 ]
'O.105 2 15.1 13.6 15.3 16.7 l
.D.106 1 15.6 l
14.5 13.5 13.6 O.106 2 l 13.5 14.5 15.4
'D 107 1 14.5 14.5 14.2 14.8 0 107 2 14.4 11.7 18.6 18.8 D.108 1 17.3 16.5 16.2 16.1 16.9
.D 108 2 19.1 18.3 17.4 17.5 D 109 1 17.8
~
17.4 16.9 18.2
~
D 109 2 20.5 19.5 11.8 21.1 j 1 0 110 3 20.2 20.2 23,1 21.6 D-110 4 20.1 19.2 19.5 19.6 D 111 1 19.2 17.8 15.5 18.0 Dd11 2 I - 58 :
a nua .a A gwouaut:uf .
D2 tan 30-JAN.98 Environm1ntal Site Ptport V4 for Dresdin P1941 2 Site Description Quarter 1 Cyarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 i 1997 1997 f3
'i .
1997 1997
- b. Inner Ring (100 Series) i D 112A-1 D 112A 2 15.9 13.1 15.4 16.1 17.0 13.3 16.6 D-113 1 17.7 A-113 2 15.0 14.4 14.9 16.4 16.4 15.8 15.8 D 114 17.3 15.3 -15.3 14.8 8 D.114 2 16.0- )
15.8 12.1 15.1
'D 115 1 16.6 16.6 16.5 16.8 18.1 D 115 2 - ;
18.4 17.2 18.1 17.6
-D.116 1 !
17.7 17.8 18.1 17.8 D-116 2 j 19.4 19.3 19.1 20.2 f Int ,ean : S.D. 17.1 1.6 16.4 + 2.1 '17.1 : 1.9 17.8 : 1.5 Annual Inner Ring Mean 1 S.D.
17.1 + 1.8 !
- c. Duter Ring (200 Series) .
D 201 1 19.4 20.4 19.6 20.6 D-201-2 19.4 20.4 20.8 20.5 D.202-1 17.4 16.8
[ 17.1 D 202 2 18.6 '
'%/ D 203 1' 18,4 18.4 17.4 19.5 15.6 14.6 14.3 15.5
-D 203-2 17.7 11.6 17.9 17.6 D 204 1 17.6 15,5 16.5 18.8 0 204 2 15.9 13.2 15.0 16.5 D-205 1
, 16,5 17.6 16.6 D-205 2 18.1 17.7 11.8 17.9 19.5 D 206 1 16.8 16.9 16.0 17.5 0-206 2 17.1 17.5 16.2 18.2 D 207 1 15.9 16.0 14.6 16.2 D 207 2 15.4 13.0 14.6 17.4 D 208-1 15.1 13 s 12.9 14.6 D 208 2 14.6 12.1 13.0 14.7 D.209 1 13.1 13.1 12.8 14.0 D 209 2 13.8 13.5 13.1 14.7 D 210 1 17.0 16.4 15.1 16.6 D 210 2
~
17.7 17.5 11.3 17.3 D*211 1 17.1 15.0 17.1 17.0 D-211-2 18.3 17.3 17.8 17.9 D.212 3 15.0 15.5 14.9 14.8 D 212 14.3 14.6 14.0 15.4 D.213 1 15.9 13.5 14.0 13.8 D 213 2 14.9 14.6 14.1 15.7 D 214 1 19.4 21.0 19.5 19.8 D 214 2 19.3 20.7 19.8 19.9
.D 215 1 19.1 20.5 19.9 18.6
)
g .D.215 2 17.1 18.1 18.3 19.7 D 216 1 19.9 20.3 20.2 19.8
' D 216 2 18.8 8 20.9 19.3 20.6 Outer Ring Mean : 8.D. 17.0 g 1.8 16.8 2.7 16.5 + 2.4 17.5 2.1 I- 59
TABLE 5.1-1 (continued)
Pages 3 Dits e . 30.JMs. 94 Environmental Site Report V4 for Dresden Annual outer Ring Mean . S.D. 16.9 2.3
. Description Quarter 1 Cyarter 2 Cuarter 3 Cuarter 4 Site 1997 1997 1997 1997
- c. Cuter Ring (200 Series)
INDICATOR LOCATION MEAN
- S.D. 16.9 1.6 16.3 2.3 16.6 2.0 17.5 : 1.7 d
16.8 2.0 Annual INDICATOR LOCATION MEAN
- 5.0.
- 11. C0errRCL LOCATIONS (2 T1.Ds per location) 14.8 2 13.8 2 13.3 2 14.0 2 D 09 COAL CITY 14.4 2 13.3 2 13.6 2 14.7 -2 0 11 MORAIS 14.8 2 13.9 2 15.1 2 D*12 LISBON 15.4 2 14.7 2 15.3 2 16.4 2 D 15 JOLIET 15.9 2 15.2 2 11.4 2 15.1 2 15.4 2 0 16 ELWCCD 14.0 2 14.1 2 14.8 2 D 17 . W11.MINGTON 14.8 2 CONTROL LOCAT10N Mean : S.D. 15.1 : 0.5 13.1 : 1.3 14.2 + 0.9 15.1 : 0.8 14.5 g 1.1 Annual CONTROL LOCAT! N Mean +'S.D.
111. SPECIAL INTEREST LOCATIONS (1 TLD per location) 27.1 34.9 32.1
'D 366 1 31.6 24.7 28.9 29.2 D 306 2 ,
27.0 22.5 28.9 26.6
- D*306 3 25.0 21.3 26.6 25.4 h D 310+1 22.9 17.5 17.9 19.0 19.1 l D 313=1 17.2 16.0 15.0 16.6 D 313 2 1 23.3 g 5.9 21.5 4.4 25.8 : 6.8 24.9
- 5.8 SPECIAL I WEREST LOCATION Mean + S.D.
23.9
- 5.7 Annual SPECIAL INTEREST LOCATION Mean
- S.D.
C0tNENTS: *** Indicates lost dosimeter. A portion of the Dose was estimaced.
Indicates edited dosimeter. The original Dose was replaced with an est mate i d value.
- 8'
'n' (n=2. 9) Indicates dose is average of n values. A * += means more than 9 values.
I - 60
o l
)
l APPENDIXII METEOROLOGICAL DATA O
O ,
i II - 1
I l gs DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION
\_) PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1997-STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET i
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND
' DIRECTION 1-3. 4-7 .8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O 2 0 0 0 2 NNE O O 1 5 0 0 6 NE O 1 0 0 0 0 '1
! ENE O O 2 0 0 0 2 E O O 2 1 0 0 3 ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O (j SSE O O O 1 1 0 2
, S 0 0 0 1' O O 1
W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 5 2 2 9 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL. 0 1 7 14 4 2 28 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 ours ~ of missing. wind measurements in this stability class: 0 urs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 120 q
II- 2 ,
i
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1997
' STABILITY. CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35'FT)
WINDS MEASURED.AT 300 FEET
' WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION- 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N- 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 NNE O O 1 1 0 0 2 NE O O O 1 0 0 1 ENE O O 1 0 0 0 1 E O O 4 1 0 0 5 ESE O O O O 1 0' 1 SE O O O O O O O SSE O O O 2 2 0 4 S 0 0 0 2 1- 0 3 SSW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 SW O O O 3 1 4 8 1
WSW O 1 1 8 0 0 10 W 0 0 ~2 1 0 0 3 WNW 0 0 3 9 3 1 16 NW 0 0 1 5 0 0 6 NNW 0 2 3 0 0 0 5 I VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 4 17 33 9 5 68 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 -
H urs of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O rs' of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 120 I
11 - 3 !
I i
l DRESDEN NUCLEAR. POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1997 l STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINOS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph) '
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 2 3 4 0 0 9
l NNE O 4 1 0 0 0 5 NE O 1 0 4 0 0 5 ENE O O 1 0 0 0 i
1 E O 2 3 2 1 0 8 :
ESE O 1 0 2 2 3 8 /
i SE O 2 0 0 1 0 3 j p SSE O O 2 1 0 0 3 l L.)
l S 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 l
l SSW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
! SW 0 0 1 1 3 0 5 WSW 0 0 3 3 1 0 7 W 0 2 7 4 0 0 13 l
l WNW 0 1 4 11 5 0 21 NW 0 1 5 3 0 0 9 NNW 1 1 3 4 0 0 9 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 1 17 33 40 15 3 '109 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class: 0
.DF'1ro of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 120 II - 4 I
T DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION l PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1997 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL l (DIFF TEMP 300-35.FT) {
WINOS MEASURED AT 300 FEET- i WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION- 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 l 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N 1 9 24 15 2 3 54 NNE 1 11 11 5 3 5 36 i
NE 3 16 10 15 11 3 58 l
ENE 4 9 29 17 0 0 59 E 1 5 21 27 10 3 67 ESE 2 2 16 19 8 6 53 SE 1 0 10 I 12 9 1 33 i SSE O 4 O
\
5 11 6 0 26 S 4 1 8 6 -21 0 40 l- SSW 2 3 8 9 5 4 31 l
SW 2 4 6 10 4 3 29 WSW 0 7 15 12 11 1 46 I l W 2 5 39 43 i
! 65 34 188 WNW 1 3 37 !
91 76 30 238 NW 2 11 30 39 16 12 110 NNW 0 9 23 18 5 5 60 VARIABLE O O O O O O O t
{
! TOTAL 23 102 292 349 252 110 1128 Hours of calm in this stability class:
0 Hours He of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 8 s of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 120 II - 5
l'
,. DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION i,)
s PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH.1997 '
STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF_ TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 6 3' O O O 9 NNE O 4 5 7 0 0 16 NE O 4 1 11 0 0 16 ,
L ENE 2 5 6 1 0 0 14 l E 1 0 6 8 1 0 16 I
ESE O 4 19 21 5 2 51 SE 2 5 6 11 8 1 33 SSE O 6 19' 7 5 O. 37 )
S 1 3 10 13 6 8 41 SSW 1 5 10 20 10 19 65 SW 0 3 3 28 14 8 56 !
WSW 0 6 11 14 6 0 37 I W O 4 14 32 17 6 73 WNW 0 0 13 36 22 2 73 NW 0 0 12 11 5 2 30 NNW 0 1 8 11 1 1 22 l VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL '7 56 146 231 100 49 589 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class: 0
" Jrs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 120 n.6 o
)
i DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF~ RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1997 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINOS MEASURED AT.300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 '8-12 18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N 2- 1 0 0 0 0 3 NNE O O O O O O O NE O 7 2 0 0 1 10 ENE 1 3 0 0 0 1 5 E O O 2 0 0 0 2 ESE 1 0 0 0 2 0 3 SE O O O 4 1 0 5 SSE O 2 1 1 0 0 4 i
S 0 3 1 0 0 0 4 SSW 0 1 1 6 1 0 9 SW 0 0 7 2 1 0 10 WSW 0 1 1 9 1 0 12 W 0 2 6 6 2 0 16 WNW 0 2 5 0 G 0 7 NW 0 3 2 1 0 0 6 NNW 0 1 0 3 0 0 4 i' VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 4 20 34 34 8 0 100 Hours of calm in this stability class: O Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O rs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 120 Il - 7 L
il DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION
/D'
() PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1997 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL i N O O O O O O l
O NNE O O O O O O O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O .0 0 0 E O O O O O O O ESE O O O O O O O SE O O O O O O O
- SSE O O O O O O
! O S 0 0 0 0 'O O O SSW 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 SW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 WSW }
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 W 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 WNW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
, NNW 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 VARIABLE O O O O O O O l-TOTAL 1 1 1 4 3 0 10 l
Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of miseing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 l l M rs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 120 V
11 - 8
? l l
I
DRESDEN NUCLEAR. POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1997 STABILITY CLASS. . EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION. 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 1 3 4 0 0 8 NNE O O 9 4 0 1 14 NE O 2 14 8 1 2 27 ENE O 7 7 3 0 0 17 E O 1 5 8 5 2 '21 ESE O 2 2 5 0 0 9 SE O 2 3 0 0 1 6 SSE O 3 10 5 0 0 18 S 0 5 1 1 0 0 7 SSW 0 2 2 5 4 0 13 SW 0 0 0- 1 2 0 3 WSW 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 W O 1 1 0 1 3 6 WNW 0 0 1 9 8 2 20 NW 0 0 2 7 5 2 16 r;
NNW 0 1 12 1 0 0 14 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 27 71 65 27 11 201 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 rs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 2 11 - 9 I
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1997 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 3 3 4 0 0 10 NNE O O 3 3 1 0 7 NE O 1 4 4 2 1 12 ENE 1 4 5 0 0 0 10 E O 1 1 1 1 1 5 i ESE 1 4 4 2 0 0 11 SE O 2 4 1 0 0 7 l
.SSE O 2 6 3 0 0 11 S 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
, SSW 0 2 2 5 7 0 16 SW 0 1 2 0 2 0 5 WSW 1 4 2 5 1 1 14 W 0 1 0 1 0 2 4 WNW 0 0 3 4 4 2 13 NW 0 0 5 7 4 3 19 ,
NNW 0 1 4 2 2 1 10 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 3 28 48 42 24 11 156 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0
-Hours of missing Wind measurements in this stability class: 0
(*^rs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 2 l
,l .
II -10
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION 4
) PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1997 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIiF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND ;
DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 5 2 0 1 0 8 3 1
NNE 1 0 0 4 1 0 6 NE 1 0 6 5 1 1 14 ENE O 3 3
~5 0 0 11 E O 4 1 1 0 0 6 ESE O 7 6 0 0 0 13 SE O 7 2 2 1 1 13 SSE O 3 9 2 0 0 14 S O 2 0 1 1 0 4 SSW 1 3 1 4 5 1 15 SW 0 3 2 3 2 1 11 WSW 0- 3 7 4 0 1 15 W O O 2 0 0 0 2 WNW 1 1 4 2 4 3 15 NW 0 3 4 1 3 4 15 NNW 0 1 1 3 2 0 7 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 4 41 57 35 20 12 169 t
Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O q {s of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 2 II -11
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1997 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) .
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTAL N 2 3 5 9 7 0 26 NNE O 5 5 7 1 0 18 NE 3 3 37 34 22 6 105 ENE O 16 44 23 3 0 86 E O 10 34 19 18 1 82 ESE 1 7 23 13 7 0 51 SE 4 10 15 7 3 3 42 ;l l
SSE O 2 17 4 10 8 41 S 1 7 9 7 6 4 34 !
SSW 2 5 14 11 11 11 54 SW 0 6 5 1 6 11 29 WSW 0 3 11 10 5 12 41 W 1 3 18 3 4 23 52-WNW 0 2 6 9 21 19 57 NW 1 1 3 22 14 6 47 NNW 0 3 5 22 4 6 40 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 15 86 251 201 142 110 805 Hours of' calm in this stability class:
0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O s of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 2 II -12
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1997 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP'300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N 0 1 1 8 2 0 12 NNE 1 0 7 21 6 0 35 NE O 7 16 24 2 0 49 ENE 3 13 17 8 0 0 41 E 1 5 19 13 2 0 -40 ESE 1 8 17 14 1 2 43 SE 1 8 16 3 0 2 30 SSE 1 4 19 8 2 2 36 S 6 17 1 11 9 10 54 SSW 1 9 10 31 24 5 80 SW 2 3 7 16 8 7 43' WSW 3 6 14 5 2 2 32 W O 2 6 10 13 0 31 WNW O 1 6 8 6 3 24 NW . 0 1- 10 9 1 2 23 NNW 0 3 5 14 2 1 25 VARIABLE. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 15- 77 187 203 80 36 598 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O rs of missing. stability measurements in all stability classes: 2 II -13
l l 1 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION
' /^s V PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1997 l
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL l N O 3 8 0 1 2 14 NNE O O 1 0 0 1 2 ;
NE l 1 0 1 2 0 0 4 l ENE O 1 2. 1 0 0 4 1
E 2 3 3 3 0 0 11 l i
i ESE O O 5 0 0 0 5 l
SE 1 3 15 10 1 0 30 A SSE 1 7 8 7 0 0 23 S 0 4 11 12 5 0 32 SSW 0 3 4 8 8 0 23 SW 0 1 5 4 0 0 10 WSW 0 0 6- 1 0 0 7 W 0 1 6 2 1 1 11 WNW 1 4 3 2 3 0 13 NW 0 4 4 1 0 0 9 NNW 0 0 2 8 4 0 14 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 6 32 79 69 25 1 212 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 ;
b$O rs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 2 i
II -14
l-DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION f V_ PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1997 l
< STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) l WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL-N O O O 0 0' O O NNE O O O O O O -O NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O E O 0 0 0 1 0 1 ESE O O 6 0 0 0 6 SE O O 0 1 1 1 3 SSE O O S 0 2
4 1 0 0 0 3 l 1 0 0 0 5 SSW 0 0 0 2 3 0 5 SW 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 WSW 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 W 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 WNW 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 NW 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 NNW 0 0 3 2 0 0 5 VARIABLE O O O O O O O 4
TOTAL. 0 13 16 6 6 0 41 Hours of' calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O n rs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 2
, V II -15 i
l:
I DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION
)
L PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1997 l STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)- ,
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET l
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL I N 0 2 7 3 0 0 12 NNE O 5 13 15 0 0 33 NE O 2 3 10 0 0 15 ENE O 8 7 0 0 0 15 E O 8 2 0 0 0 10 ESE O 12 6 0 0 0 18 SE O 6 16 1 0 0 23
(} SSE S
O 3 3
5 0 0
0 0 8 1 5 0 0 9 j SSW 0 6 14 2 0 0 22 SW 0 5 2 16 0 0 23
- WSW 1 3 13 5 1 3 26 .
L W 0 2 9 0 0 0 11 I WNW 0 1 3 0 1 0 5 :
NW 0 1 10 1 0 0 12 NNW 0 1 2 14 2 0 19 '
VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL- 2 68 117 67 4 3 261 Hours of calm in this stability class: O rs of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O rs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 l
11 - 1 6
l l
l 1 l- DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION
\
(%
l 't.) PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1997 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED'AT 300 FEET-WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O 4 4 0 0 8 NNE l 1 1 1 2 0 0 5 NE 1 3 4 2 0 0 10 ENE O 8 3 0 0 0 11 E 1 3 0 0 0 0 4-ESE O 7 0 0 0 0 7 SE O 4 5 1 0 0 10 SSE O 2 6 1 0 0 9 S O 1 7 1 0 0 9 l
SSW 0 5 2 1 0 0 8 SW- 2 4 3 4 0 0 13 WSW 1 5 7 6 0 0 19 W 2 3 2 3 1 i 12 WNW O 3 3 0 1 0 7 NW 1 2 6 3 0 0 12 ,
NNW 0 1 7' 7 0 0 15 '
VARIABLE O O O O O O O F
.h TOTAL 9 52 60 35 2 1 159 f
l Hours of-calm in this stability class: 0 l Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class: 0
(')Nrs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 l
l II -17 t-
l DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION
~
PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1997 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 5 1 3 0 0 9 NNE, 0 1 6 2 0 0 9 NE- 0 3 3 4 0 0 10 l
ENE 3 7 3 0 0 0 13 l
E O 1 2 1 0 0 4 j ESE 1 4 2 1 0 0 8 l SE 2 5 4- 0- 0 0 11 l
SSE O 2 3 2 0 0 7 j' S 0 3 4 4 0 0 11 SSW 0 4 4 2 0 0 10 SW 0 0 2 2 2 0 6 WSW O 3 5 4 4 1 17 W 0 2 2 5 5 3 17 WNW 2 2 4 1 0 0 9 NW -1 0 4 1 1 0 7 j NNW 0 1 6 3 1 0 11 l VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 9 43 55 35 13 4 159 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 i rs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 l
!! -18
i.
p.
l DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1997 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT-300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND l DIRECTION 1 4-7 8-12 18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL l- N O 4 20 14 0 0 38 i
I j_ 'NNE O 6 20 20 3 0 49 l
'NE 2 10 22 22 3 0 59 ENE 0. 24 33 ' 0 'O O 57 E 1 7 23 10 0 0 41 ESE O 8 15 3 1 0 27 1
.SE 2 4 6 2 0 0 14 i
.SSE 1 6 21 19 0 0 47 S 1 6 11 26 4 49 1 I SSW 1 10 20 9 5 2 47 SW 1 0 8. 12 7 1 29 WSW 3 6 6 11 7 0 33 W 2 8 11 13 1 3 38 WNW 2 8 14 8 3 5 40 l
l NW 1 2 12 10 3 0 28 l
dPW 0 6 15 16 0 0 37 VARIABLE. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i
TOTAL 17 115 257 195 37 12 633 I Hours of calm in this. stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O rs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: O II 19
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1997 STABILITY CLASS'- SLIGHTLY STABLE .(DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET ,
WIND SPEED'(in mph)
-WIND DIRECTION 1 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >'24 TOTAL'
, N 1~ 2 10 6 5 0 24 NNE O 3 16 19- 4 0 42 NE 2 4 31 18 3, O ~58:
ENE O 16 18 O' O 0 34 E 1 6 19 19 0 0 45 ESE 3 4 8 11 0 0 26 SE 1 4 15 10 1 0 31
\
l t
L-SSE 1 1.1 20 15 2 0 49 i I
S 1 4 11 15 16 0 47 c Y
! 'SSW 0 3 8 25 13 0 49 SW 0 5 14 28 2- 1 50 WSW .0 1 19 10 3 0 33 W 0 6 6 12 4 0 28' WNW 2 6 6 22 9 1 46
.NW 1 4 13 19 8 0 45 NNW 0 2 9 13 1 0 2 f>
VARIABLE- 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 l
TOTAL 13 81 223 242 71 2 632 Hours"of calm'in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 f a rs. of missing stability measurements in all- stability classes: O L
II-20
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1997 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) l WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED.(in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 2 2 7 1 0 12 NME O 1 12 5 0 0 18 NE O 4 6 4 5 0 19 ENE 2 5 8 0 0 0 15 E O 3 1 1 0 0 5 j ESE 1 4 2 5 0 0 12 j SE 1 5 9 12 2 0 29 SSE O 5 12 3 0 0 20 S 1 0 10 7 0 0 18 SSW 1 4 3 12 'O O 20 i SW 1 1 4 15 3 0 24 WSW 0 4 12 13 6 0 35 W 2 2 6 7 1 0 18 WNW 0 2 4 4 1 0 11 NW 0 3 8 3 0 0 14 NNW 0 2 4 5 0 0 11 VARIABLE O O O O O O O t.
TOTAL 9 47 103 103 19 0 281 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class: O rs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 II -21
)
, DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION '
PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1997 l STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) l WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND j DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL i
l I
N 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 j NNE 2 1 3 1 0 0 7 .
1 NE O 3 1 2 0 0 6 ENE O 2 0 0 0 0 2 E 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 ESE 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 SE O 1 2 5 0 0 8 SSE O O 3 5 0 0 8 S 1 1 4 0 0 0 6 SSW- 0 2 3 3 0 0 8 SW 0 3 3 2 0 0 8 WSW 1 2 1 1 0 0 5 W 0 1 0 5 1 0 7 I
WNW 0 4 1 0 0 0 5 NW 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 NNW 2 3 0 0 0 0 5 1 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 10 26 22 24 1 0 83 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O p urs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 J
II -22 f
DRESDEN' NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER'1997 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
-WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O 1. 1 0 0 0 2 NE O 2 1 0 0 0 3 ENE O 1 0 0 0 0 1 E O 1 0 0 0 0 '1 l ESE O 2 0 0 0 0 2 SE O O 1 0 0 0 1 SSE. _0
_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 SSW O O O 1 0 0 1 SW 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 WSW 'O O O O O O O i I
W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NW 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 i
NNW 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 7 5 5 0 1 18 Hoursfof calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0
-(~ urs.of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 II -23
)
-r% DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION k-) PERIOD OF-RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1997
'. STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300-FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
. WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 1 2 0 0 0 3 NNE O 1 1 0 0 0 2 NE O 1 1 6 0 0 8 ENE O 1 0 0 0 0 1 i
E O 3 0 0 0 0 3 ESE O O O O O O O SE O 2 2 2 0 0 6 SSE O O O O O O O S O O O O O 1 1 I SSW 0 0 3 6 2 0 11 i SW 0 0 1 1 2 1 5 WSW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 l
W 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 WNW 0 1 5 0 3 1 10 NW 0 1 2 1 1 0 5 NNW 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 11 19 20 8 3 61 l-Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 (O~Nrs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 11 - 2 4
l DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION
\O lV PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1997 L STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET i i
WIND SPEED (in mph)
, WIND I DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL 1 N 1 1 2 3 0 ,
0 7 NNE O O 1 0 0 0 1 l l
NE O O O' 1 0 0 1 1
ENE O O O O O O O' 1
E O 1 2 1 0 0 4 )
ESE O 2 0 2 1 0 5 SE O 2 0 0 0 0 2 i SSE O 3 0 1 0 0 4 S 0 1 1 1 3 0 6 SSW 0 1 3 8 2 0 14 SW 0 0 3 3 0 4 10 WSW i 3 1 1 0 0 6 j
i W 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 !
l WNW 0 3 9 8 0 1 21 l
NW 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 !
I I
NNW 0 1 2 4 0 0 7 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 2 20 25 37 6 5 95 i
Hours of calm in this stability class: 0
, Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O l I
Ours -of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: O lfV II -25
r l
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION A
O PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1997 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL l
l N 2 4 16 32 7 0 61 NNE O 3 12 21 22 2 60 NE 2 2 22 18 10 3 57 1
ENE O 13 45 20 2 0 80 E O 9 40 23 4 0 76 ESE O 1 15 6 1 0 23 ,
i SE 2 1 11 3 0 0 17 SSE O 6 13 11 8 5 43 i
O~
S 2 6 9 30 25 9 81 '
SSW 1: 4 11 23 12 3 54 SW 0 10 20 35 9 2 76 WSW 0 4 9 31 6 1 51 W 1 8 38 96 27 1 171 l
WNW 2 6 29 59 22 2 120 NW 1 17 23 27 9 0 77 NNW 3 5 28 30 15 3 84 l VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 16 99 341 465 179 31 1131 i
Hours of- calm in this_ stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 48 Purs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 l O
i I II -26 l.
a
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: ' OCTOBER-DECEMBER-1997 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF-TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)'
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL 1 N O 2 15' 29 0 0 46 NNE O 6 9 22 1 0 38 NE O 2 9 5 0 0 16 ENE 2 6 5 0 0 0 13 E 2 6 10 3 0 0 21 ESE O 6 5 5 0 0 16 .
SE 1 1 8 5 4 0 19 SSE O 2 2 29 12 0 45 S 1 5 9 27 25 5 72 .
SSW 1 2 7 43 27 2 82 SW 0 5 7 25 18 1 56 WSW 2 3 7 13 1 0 26 W -0 3 11 28 3 0 45
,WNW 0 1 13 17 3 0 34 !
I NW 1 1 16 7 3 0 28 NNW 1 3 7 15 8 0 34 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 11 54 140 273 105 8 591 Hours of calm in,this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 OJrs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 V
II 27
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1997 f STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph) j WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 4 2 7 3 0 16 NNE O 2 1 7 0 0 10 NE O 2 1 3 0 0 6 ENE 2 2 1 0 0 0 5 l
E 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 j ESE O 2 1 0 6 0 9 i SE O 5 6 2 0 0 13 r'% SSE 6 5 2 10 0 0 23 tj S 0- 1 9 2 1 0 13 SSW 1 4 6 5 6 0 22 SW 1 1 6 30 6 0 44 WSW 0 2 7 11 2 0 22 W 1 1 10 1 0 0 13 WNW 0 0 6 4 1 0 11 NW 0 0 4 3 0 0 7 NNW 0 2 3 4 1 0 10 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 12 33 G7 89 26 0 227 '
Hodrs of calm in this stability class: 0 ,
Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 0
(v~SJrs of missin9 stability measurements in all stability classes:
11-28
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: 0CTOBER-DECEMBER 1997 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE' (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED-AT 300 FEET'
. WIND SPEED (in mph)
. WIND DIRECTION 1-3. 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >.24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O 2 0 0 2
.NE O- 0 1 2 0 0 3 ENE O 1 0 0 0 0 1 E. 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 ESE O 1 0 0 1 0 2 ;
SE O O O O O O O i t
. SSE 1 0 2 6 0 0 9
.O S 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 i
SSW 0- 0 1 3 0 0 4 j
-SW 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 WSW- 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 W O O 5 0 0 0 5
-h WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i NW 0 0 1 1 0 0 2.
NNW 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 VARIABLE O O O O O O O s
- TOTAL 1 4 15 16 1 0 37
' Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0
(~Nurs of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0
'%.)
11 - 2 9
I i
I l
l I
I i
! APPENDIXIII i LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES l
O l
O III - 1
l
. /^C DRESDEN'
.V 3.0 T.IRTING OF MISSED SAMPLES Expected -
Couection a
SampleType . Location - Date Reason A/I D-16 ' 02-22-97 No sample; area flooded A/l D 09-06-97 Volume very low due to blown fuse; replaced pump. Sample.
discarded as invalid.
Air Sameline Variancesb -
A/1 D-08 02 22-97 Volume low; possible outage or bad RTh!. ' power A/I D-08 04-19-97 Volume low; no apparent reason for low reading.
A D-08 05-24-97 Volume low; no apparent reason for low reading; possible power outage due to storm.
O TLD. Other 06-28-97 Quarterly exchan e not done;
' TLDs not availabfe at station.
- Will exchange 7/5/97.
A/I D-08 06-28-97 No apparent reason for low 1
reading.
A/I D-08 07-19-97 Low reading, possibly due to power outage from storms. 3 1
A/I D-10 07-19 97 No electricity; station Point of Contact notified. i A D42 08-17-97 Volume low;possible power . 'l.
outage due to storms or pump overheatin 8/23/97, g. Willcheck
' A/I D-17 11-01-97 Pump not working; removed for repair; replaced pump.
-A. D-03 11-08-97 Volume low; no visible reason ,
for low reading. ]
A D-04 11-08-97 Volume low; no visible reason for low reading.
A/I - D-02 11 15-97 Volume low due to scheduled power outage; estimated FLA=60.
- A/I = Air Particulate / Air lodine;TLD = Thermoluminescent Dosimeter.
-b ,
Air Samplinpts sample resu or factors which contribute to sample anomalies. Variances are samples which ha1 III - 2
i l
o I
l l
APPENDIX IV MILCH ANIMALS, NEAREST LIVESTOCK, AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUSES l
O r
O. ,
IV - 1
1 1
'() DRESDEN i
MILCH ANIMALS CENSUS,1997 l A. There are no dairy farms within a 5.0 mile radius of Dresden Station.
-l B. Sampling Locations i- l
! I D-25 V. Biros Dairy Farm i1.4 miles, Sector J Number of cows being milked - 94 Diet consists of: 25% pasture 25% ground grain 50% green chop _
D-26 Halpins Dairy Farm 16.0 miles, Sector J Number of cows being milked - 55 Diet consists of: 10% orless pasture l 25% ground grain 65% green chop, hay or silage Sherman Tweet Farma 8.5 miles, Sector Q Number of cows being milked - 40
~
Diet consists of: 25% pasture 25% ground grain 50% hay or silage a Farm does not wish to participate in program at this time.
Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 25,1997.
L L LO.
IV-2
l DRESDEN NEAREST LIVESTOCK CENSUS,1997 Nearest livestock of the DresdenStation within a 6.2 mile radius. j l
1 Sector Direction Distance .
A- N 1.4 miles B NNE. 6.0 miles C NE 2.5 miles
, D ENE 4.7 miles E E None H a
F !
ESE None '
G SE None H SSE None J S 1.2 miles
.M. WSW . None N W 0.5 miles
[ P WNW 0.5 miles
'Q. NW 0.5 miles R NNW l.0 miles Census conducted by A.D. Lewis on August 27,1997 IV-3
/
m
r DRESDEN '
fs. -
NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS,1997 Nearest resident of the DresdenStation within a 6.2 mile radius..
\
! l Sector Direction Distance .
A N 1.2 miles 1 l B NNE 0.8 miles C NE 2.3 miles D ~ENE 0.8 miles !
E E 1.1 miles F ESE 1.0 miles G SE 0.6 miles I
.[ H SSE 0.5 miles l- J S 0.5 miles l
K SSW 3.3 miles L SW 3.7 miles M WSW 5.8 miles N W 3.5 miles P WNW- 3.7 miles Q NW 2.6 miles R NNW 0.8 miles Census conducted by A.D. Lewis on August 20,1997 .
i IW4
l 1
l l
l l
APPENDIX V
- %) INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS t
i 1
l I-NOTE: Teledyne participates in intercomparison studies administered by U.S. EPA Environmental l -- Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada. The results are reported in Appendix A.
Also reported are results of in-house spikes, blanks, duplicates and mixed analyte performance
. evaluation program. Appendix A is updated four times a year; the complete Appendix is included in March, June, September and December monthly progress reports only. Please refer to March, q June, September and December progress reports for information.
January,1997 through December,1997 l'
L V-1 l
l
./*T I s L/
Appendix V I
Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest Laboratory (formerly Teledyne Isotopes and Hazelton Environmental Services) has participated in interlaboratory comparison (crosscheck) programs since the formulation of its quality control program in December 1971. These programs are operated by agencies which supply environmental type samples (e.g., milk or water) containing concentrations of radionuclides know to the issuing agency but not to participant laboratories. The purpose of such a program is to provide an independent check on the laboratory's analytical procedures and to alert it to any possible problems.
Participant laboratories measure the concentration of specified radionuclides and report them to the issuing agency. Several months later, the agency reports the Laown values to the participant laboratories and specifies controllimits. Results consistently higher or lower than the known values or outside the control limits indicate a need to check the instruments or procedures used.
The rese!ts in Table A-1 were obtained through participation in the environmental sample crosscheck program for milk, water, air filters, and food samples during the current year. This program is conducted by O
(V the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Developement National Exposure Research Laboratory Characterization Research Division-Las Vegas, Nevada.
Table A-2 lists results of the analyses on in-house " spiked" samples.
Table A-3 lists results of the in-house " blank" samples.
Table A-4 lists results of the in-house " duplicate" program.
Table A-5 list results of the Environmental Measurement Laboratory Quality Assessment Program.
Out-ef.!imit results are explained directly below the result.
,m .
y V-2
1 t
Vable A-1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's crosscheck program, comparison of EPA and Teledyne Brown (V - - Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest Laboratory results for various sample media'. j 6
Concentration in pCi/L 1 l
Lab Sample Date _
EPA Result
- Control ' TBEESML Results-Code Type Collected Analysis 1s, N=1 Limits 2 Sigma d j
- STW-782 Water Jan,1997 Sr-89 12.0 i 5.0 3.3 - 20.7 9.7 i 0.6; 1.1 STW-782 Water Jan,1997 Sr-90 25.0 i 5.0 16.3 - 33.7 24.0 1.0;2.6 STW-783 Water Jan,1997 Gr. Alpha 5.2 i 5.0 0.0 - 13.9 10.011.4;1.8 STW-783 - Water Jan,1997 Gr. Beta 14.7 i 5.0 6.0 - 23.4 15.8 i 2.0;3.2 STW-784 ' Water Feb,1997 I-131 86.0 i 9.0 70.4 - 101.6 86.012.0;8.8 STW-784 Water Feb,1997 I-131 86.0 i 9.0 70.4 - 101.6 79.3 i 2.0;8.2 STWW-786 ' Water Feb,1997 Ra-226 5.9 0.9 4.3 - 7.5 6.7 i 0.2; 0.7 i
STWW-786 Water Feb,1997 Ra-228 8.2 i 2.1 4.6 - 11.8 8.4 i 1.' 1.4 STWW-786 Water Feb,1997 Uranium 27.0 t 3.0 21.8 - 32.3 26.5 i 1.3;2.9 l
Mar,1997 S Water H-3 7900.0 i 790.0 6529.4 - 9270.6 7594.0 i 279.7;1070.0
- p) TW-787 VSTW-794 Water Apt,1997 Gr. Alpha 48.0i l2.0 27.2 - 68.8 44.311.6
- 5.6 l :
I; STW-794 Water Apr,1997 Ra-226 13.0 i 2.0 9.5 - 16.5 10.710.9;1.4 l
STW-794 Water Apr,1997 Ra-228 3.1 1 0.8 1.7 - 4.5 4.7 i 0.4;0.6 -
! All raw data and calculations were reviewed for errors. The analysis was repeated
! with the technician observed by the lab supervisor; the result of the reanalysis 3.10.5 l
pCi/L. The suspected cause of the lugher result was the lower than expected recovery of barium tracer. No further action is planned at this time.
STW-794 Water Apr,1997 Uranium 24.0 i 3.0 18.8 - 29.2 26.810.3;2.7 l
STW-795 Water Apr,1997 Co-60 21.015.0 12.3 - 29.7 21.7 i 0.6;3.2 STW-795 Water Apr,1997 Cs-134 31.015.0 22.3 - 39.7 27.3 i 1.2;4.1 L
l STW-795 Water Apr,1997 Cs-137 22.0 i 5.0 13.3 - 30.7 21.7 i 1.5;3.5 l
STW-795 Water Apr,1997 Gr. Beta 102.1 i 15.3 75.6 - 128.6 98.2 i 2.1;15.3 STW-795 Water Apr,1997 Sr-89 24.0 i 5.0 15.3 - 32.7 21.3 1.2; 2.4 STW-795 Water Apr,1997 Sr-90 13.015.0 4.3 - 21.7 12.7 i 0.6;1.4 STW-796 Water Jun,1997 Ba-133 25.0 i 5.0 16.3 - 33.7 24.7 i 1.2;3.7 TW-796 Water Jun,1997 Co-60 18.0 i 5.0 9.3 - 26.7 18.7 i 0.6;2.8 STW-795 Water Jun,1997 Cs-134 22.0 i 5.0 13.3 - 30.7 19.7 i 0.6;2.9 STW-796 Water Jun,1997 Cs-137 49.0 i 5.0 40.3 - 57.7 52.012.0;7.8 V-3
i L
l l
1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's crosscheck program, comparison of EPA and Teledyne Brown l ]able V A-1. Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest Laboratory results for various sample media'.
Concentration in pCi/L" Lab Sample Date EPA Result
- Control TBEESML Results Code Type Collected Analysis 1s, N=1 Limits 2 Sigma d STW-796 Water Jun,1997 Zn-65 100.0 i 10.0 82.7 - 117.3 101.0 1 2.0;14.7 STW-797 Water Jun,1997 Ra 226 3.0i0.5 2.1 - 3.9 2.7 i 0.1 ; 0.3 STW-797 Water Jun,1997 Ra-228 3.110.8 1.7 - 4.5 2.3 i 0.3; 0.4 STW-797 Water Jun,1997 Uranium 40.3 4.0 33.4 - 47.2 38.1 i 1.0;3.9 STW-799 Water Jul,1997 Sr-89 44.0 i 5.0 35.3 - 52.7 37.7 3.2;4.9
. STW-799 Water Jul,1997 St-90 16.015.0 7.3 - 24.7 16.011.0;1.9 !
STW-802 Water Jul,1997 I-131 10.0 t 6.0 0.0 - 20.4 10.7 1.2;1.6 STW-800 Water Jul,1997 Gr. Alpha 3.1 i 5.0 0.0 - 11.8 3.1 i 0.3;0.5 STW-800 Water Jul,1997 Gr. Beta 15.1 i 5.0 6.4 - 23.8 13.9 i 0.2;2.2
]
Water Aug,1997 H3 11010.0 1101.0 9099.8 - 12920.2 11348.7 i 241.4;1562.2 MTW-801
/
( '5TW-803 Water Sep,1997 Ra-226 20.0 i 3.0 14.8 - 25.2 20.0 i 0.8;2.1 STW-803 Water Sep,1997 Ra-228 S.0 + '?.0 4.5 - 11.5 7.0 i 0.1;0.7 STW-803 Water Sep,1997 Uranium 5.1 1 3.0 0.0 - 10.3 5.0 0.1;0.5 STW-811 Water Nov,1997 Ba 133 99.0 i 10.0 81.7 - 116.3 97.3 i 5.0;14.9 j STW-811 Water Nov,1997 Co-60 27.015.0 16.3 - 35.7 28.3 i 1.7;4.4 !
STW-811 Water Nov,1997 Cs-134 10.015.0 1.3 - 18.7 9.711.0;1.7 STW-811 Water Nov,1997 Cs-137 74.0 i 5.0 65.3 - 82.7 78.0 i 3.5;11.8 i
STW-811 Water Nov,1997 Zn-65 75.0 t 8.0 61.1 - 88.9 76.7 2.1;11.2 l l
' Results obtained by Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Midwest Laboratory as a participant in l the environmental sample crosscheck program operated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Developement National Exposure Research Laboratory Characterization Research Division-Las y Vegas, Nevada. !
6 USEPA results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma,1 determination) and controllimits as defined by the EPA.
Unless otherwise indicated, the TBEESML results are given as the mean i 2 standard deviations for three determinations, The numbers after the semi-colon are the Total Propagated Uncertainty of the result.
l O
fV l
V-4
t
,~' ~ l s
Table A-2. In-house " spike" sample 3. I h
Concentration in pCi/L' Lib Sample Date Accepted Known TBEESML Results l Code Type Collected Analysis Rejected Activity Control Limits
- 2s, n=1' SFW-844 Water Jan,1997 Th-230 A 3.1 2.4 - 3.7 3.1 0.1 ; 0.3 l
SPW-844 Water Jan,1997 Th-232 A 3.1 2.4 - 3.7 3.4 i 0.1 ;0.4 l SPW-548 Water Feb,1997 Gr. Beta A 41.9 33.1- 50.6 43.911.3;4.6 SPMI-534 Milk Feb,1997 Cs-134 A 56.4 43.8- 69.0 48.6 i 4.9;6.9 SPMI-534 Milk Feb,1997 Cs-137 A 52.3 37.0- 67.6 54.7 i 8.5;10.1 SPMI6.<5 Milk Feb,1997 Sr-89 A 40.0 26.7- 53.4 49.817.9;9.4 SPMI-535 Milk Feb,1997 Sr-90 A 50.3 40.1- 60.5 48.9 1.7;5.2 SPW-536 Water Feb,1997 H-3 A 28234.0 22650.4- 33817.6 27229.7 452.1;2760.2 SPW-547 Water Feb,1997 Co-60 A 63.0 45.7- 80.2 65.2 8.8;10.9 SPW-547 Water Feb,1997 Cs-134 A 56.4 41.2- 71.7 53.0 i 8.0;9.6 SPW-547 Water Feb,1997 Cs-137 A 52.3 32.8- 71.8 60.4 12.9;14.2 SPW-600 Water Feb,1997 I-131 A 66.3 52.4- 80.2 72.2 i 1.0;7.3 SPW-600 Water Feb,1997 I-131(g) A 66.3 43.3- 89.3 68.8 14.8;16.3
/
Charcoal Feb,1997 I-131(g) A 1.1 0.9 - 1.3 1.210.0;0.1 lCH-701 Canister SPAP-704 Air Filter Feb,1997 Gr. Beta A 5.7 4.5 - 6.9 6.3 i 0.0;0.6 i SPW-838 Water Feb,1997 Ra-226 A 17.3 13.6- 21.0 19.8 i 0.2;2.0 SPW-838 Water Feb,1997 Ra-228 A 31.3 23.7- 38.9 36.8 2.6;4.5 j SPW-840 Water Feb,1997 Sr-90 A 33.5 26.1- 41.0 35.8 2.0;4.1 SPW-841 Water Feb,1997 1-129 A 14.9 11.7- 18.2 15.5 0.9;1.8 !
l SPW-843 Water Feb,1997 Fe-55 A 1.5 0.8 - 2.2 1.4 0.5;0.5 ;
SPAP-2730 Air Filter Mar,1997 Cs-137 A 1.9 1.5 - 2.3 2.2 i 0.0;0.2 SPMI-1670 Milk Apr,1997 Cs-134 A 53.6 38.0- 69.2 50.3 i 8.9;10.2 SPMI-1670 Milk Apr,1997 Cs-137 A 52.1 31.0- 73.2 56.1 1 14.9;15.9 l SPW-2073 Water Apr,1997 Co-60 A 51.3 39.3- 63.3 54.1 i 4.3;6.9
]
SPW-2073 Water Apt,1997 Cs-134 A 53.2 41.6- 64.8 47.614.2;6.3 J SPW-2073 Water Apr,1997 Cs-137 A 52.1 38.5- 65.7 60.7 i 5.8;8.4 i SPW-2075 Water Apr,1997 Gr. Alpha A 41.3 32.8- 49.8 34.6 2.7;4.4 SPW-2075 Water Apr,1997 Cr. Beta A 41.7 33.3- 50.1 38.7i l.7;4.2 j
SPW-2546 Water Apr,1997 H-3 A 26257.0 21050.9- 31463.1 25445.5 1 428.4;2580.4 SPF-3434 Fish May,1997 Cs-134 A 0.2 0.2 - 0.3 0.2 i 0.0;0.0 SPF-3434 Fish May,1997 Cs-137 A 0.2 0.2 - 0.3 0.2 0.0; 0.0 f
76.2 0.8 ; 7.7 9PW-3750 Water Jun,1997 I-131 A 71.8 57.0- 86.6
'W-3750 Water Jun,1997 I-131(g) A 71.8 53.6- 90.0 66.6 8.8;11.0 SPMI-3752 Milk Jun,1997 1-131 A 71.8 56.6- 87.0 79.910.8;8.0 SPMI-3752 Milk Jun,1997 I-131(g) A 71.8 53.6- 90.0 78.9 i 7.8;11.1 l V-5
1 i
l
. Table A-2. In-house " spike" samples. !
Concentration in pCi/ L' Lnb '3 ample Date Accepted Known TBEESML Results l Code __ Type Collected Analysis Rejected Activity Controi Limits
- 2s, n=1' '
SPCH-375 Charcoal Jun,1997 I-131(g) A 76.6 60.7- 92.5 81.910.3;8.2 Canister SPMI-4216 Milk Jul,1997 Cs-134 A 39.5 28.9- 50.1 38.3 5.5; 6.7 SPMI-4216 Mi1k Jul,1997 Cs-137 A 41.5 25.8 - 57.2 46.5 t 10.6;11.6 SPMI-4216 Milk Jul,1997 I 131 A 83.2 67.3- 99.1 75.2 i 0.8;7.6 SPMI-4216 Milk Jul,1997 1-131(g) A 83.2 63.9- 102.6 84.9 7.0;11.0 SPMI-4216 Milk Jul,1997 Sr-90 A 33.2 26.2- 40.2 33.611.4;3.7 SPW-4420 Water Jul,1997 Co-60 A 24.9 17.3- 32.5 26.314.4;5.1 SPW-4420 Water Jul,1997 Cs-134 A 39.5 29.4- 49.7 36.6 i 5.0;6.2 SPW-4420 Water Jul,1997 Cs-137 A 41.5 28.3- 54.6 45.617.8;9.0 SPW-4420 Water Jul,1997 I-131(g) A 83.2 62.0- 104.4 85.219.7;12.9 SPW-4420 Water Jul,1997 Sr-90 A 33.2 25.9 - 40.5 36.3 i 1.6;4.0 SPMI-4916 Mi1k Jul,1997 Cs-134 A 39.5 28.9- 50.2 38.3 5.5;6.7
' ~?MI-4916 Milk Jul,1997 Cs 137 A 41.5 25.8- 57.2 46.5 1 10.6;11.6
,,.bMI-4916 Milk Jul,1997 I-131(g) A 83.2 63.9- 102.6 84.9 i 7.0;11.0 SPW-5470 Water Jul,1997 Fe-55 A 5.5 4.1 - 6.8 4.5 t 0.6;0.8 SPW-5472 Water Jul,1997 H-3 A 41578.0 33304.4- 49851.6 41026.0 i 329.0;4115.8 SPW-5474 Water Jul,1997 Gr. Alpha A 41.3 31.8- 50.8 49.3i 2.1;5.3 SPW-5474 Water Jul,1997 Gr. Beta A 41.4 32.6- 50.2 44.511.3;4.6 SPF-5476 Fish Jul,1997 Cs-134 A 0.7 0.6 - 0.8 0.610.0;0.1 SPF-5476 Fish Jul,1997 Cs-137 A 0.5 0.4 - 0.7 0.6 0.0;0.1 SPW-7500 Water Oct,1997 Co-60 A 33.6 22.2- 45.1 30.417.5;8.1 SPW-7500 Water Oct,1997 Cs-134 A 36.1 24.8- 47.4 37.416.7;7.7 SPW-7500 Water Oct,1997 Cs-137 A 41.2 24.6- 57.8 52.8 i 11.3;12.5 SPW-7500 Water Oct,1997 I-131 A 78.3 62.6- 94.0 78.1 1.2;7.9 SPMI-7505 Milk Oct,1997 Cs-134 A 18.0 12.7- 23.4 15.2 3.3; 3.6 SPMI-7505 Milk Oct,1997 Cs-137 A 82.4 61.8- 103.1 91.1 i 8.4;12.4 SPMI-7505 Milk Oct,1997 I-131 A 78.3 63.0- 93.6 73.5 i 1.3;7.5 SPMI-7505 Milk Oct,1997 I-131(g) A 78.3 58.9- 97.7 74.6 8.8;11.5 SPMI-7506 Milk Oct,1997 Sr-89 A 39.5 30.0- 49.0 31.314.6;5.6 SPMI-7506 Milk Oct,1997 St-90 A 33.0 26.2- 39.7 31.5 i 1.4;3.4 SPCH-772 Charcoal Oct,1997 I-131(g) A 0.4 0.3 - 0.6 0.S i 0.1 ; 0.1
, Canister AP-7730 Air Filter Oct,1997 Gr. Beta (ss) A 3.0 2.4 - 3.7 3.1 i 0.0; 0.3 SPF-8485 Fish Nov,1997 Cs-134 A 0.3 0.2 - 0.4 0.310.0;0.0 SPF-6485 Fish Nov,1997 Cs-137 A 0.6 0.5 - 0.8 0.7 0.0;0.1 V-6
VTable A-2. In-house " spike" samples. ,
Concentration in pCi/L' Lab .. Sample Date Accepted ' Known TBEESML Results Code' Type- ' Collected Analysis ' Rejected - Activity Control Limits * ' 2s. n=1'
.. SPW-9315 - Water Nov,1997 Gr. Alpha A 41.3 29.0- 53.6 51.4 i 6.4;8.2 SPW 9315 Water Nov,1997 Gr. Beta A' 43.2 32.7- 53.6 48.9 3.7;6.2 SPW-9706 _ Water Dec,1997 Gr. Alpha 'A 41.3 31.0- 51.5 40.5 i 4.6;6.1 SPW-9853 Water Dec,1997 Co-60 A. 42.1 28.4- 55.7 44.9 8.3;9.4 SFW-9353 ' Water Dec,1997 Cs-134 A 37.9 - 26.0 49.7 40.0 7.0;8.1
' All results are in pCi/L, except for elemental potassium (K) data in milk, which are in mg/L.; air filter samples, which are in pCi/ filter; and food products, which are in uCi/kg.
- Control limits are based on the known value t 10hTPU (where all parametric uncertainties, other than counting
. statistics, are less than 5%).
- All samples are the results of single determinations. The result is reported in the following format:
Activity i Counting Error ; Total Propagated Uncertainty.
NOTE: For fish, Jello is used for the spike matrix. For vegetation, sawdust is used for the spike matrix.
~
(q-)'
V-7
t l-L l
}f _;
. Table 'A-3. In-house " blank" samples.
n i- Concentration pCi/L'.
Teledyne Results Acceptance Sample Sample - '(4.66 Sigma) Criteria
- Lab ..
l ' Code: Type Date Analysis - LLD- Activitv* (4.66 Sigma) >
SPW-845 : Water Jan1997f Th 228 <0.9 -0.26 i 0.56;0.56- < 1.0 SPW-845 Water Jan1997 Th-230 : <0.2 0.19 1 0.24:0.24 < 1.0
' SPW-845 - Water Jan1997 Th-232 <0.2 ' -0.02 i 0.14;0.14' < 1.0
- SPMI-533 Milk Feb 1997 Cs 134 '<2.7 0.53 0.65;0.65 < 10.0 - j l SPMI-533 Milk Febl997 Cs-137 <5.5 0.53 i 3.38;3.38 < 10.0 i
L SPW-2 Water Febl997- Ra-226 < 0.1 0.00 i 0.03;0.03 - < 1.0 t .- SPMI-533 Milk Feb1997 I-131 <0.5 -0.03 to.32;0.32 < 0.5 -
SPMI-533 Milk Feb l997-- Sr-89 <0.7 -0.99 i 0.95;0.96 ~<5.0
' SPMI-533. Milk- Feb 1997 Sr-90 N/A 1.70 10.44;0.47 < 1.0 ';
Low level of Sr-90 concentration in milk (1-5 pCi/L) is not unusual.
0.07 i 0.18;0.18' < 10.0
~
SPW-537 Water - Feb 1997 Co-60 <3.1
- SPW-537 Water Feb 1997 Cs-134 <3.5 0.91 1 1.10;1.11 < 10.0 ,
SPW-537 ' Water - Feb 1997 Cs-137 <1.7 -1.43 11.80;1.81 < 10.0 SPW-537 Water Febl997 Gr. Alpha <0.4 -0.11 i 0.22:0.22 < 1.0 l
SPW-537 Water Feb l997 Gr. Beta <0.9 -0.15 i 0.60;0.60 < 3.2 SPW-537 Water Feb l997 I-131 < 0.4 -0.28 1 0.24;0.24 < 0.5 l SPW-537 Water Feb l997 Sr 89 <0.8 -0.17 1 0.56;0.56 < 5.0
- i. SPW-537 Water Feb1997 Sr-90 ' <0.5 0.10 1 0.24:0.24 < 1.0 SPW-842 ' Water Febl997 Fe-55 <0.7 -0.40 0.37;0.38 < 1000.0 SPW-842 - Water Feb1997 I-129 <0.9 -0.13 1 0.44;0.44 < 1.5 SPW-842 Water Feb l997 Ra-226 <0.04 0.01 1 0.03:0.03 < 1.0 SPAP-2731 Air Filter Mar 1997 Co-60 <2.5 - 0.00 i 0.00;0.00 < 10.0 Air Filter Mar 1997 Cs-134 <2.6 -0.00 i 0.00;0.00 < 10.0 SPAP-2731" l
- SPAP-2731 ' Air Filter Mar 1997 Cs-137 <2.9 - 0.00 1 0.00;0.00 < 10.0 Milk Apr1997 Cs-134 <5.5 0.07 i o.12:0.12 < 10.0 :
SPMI-1669 Milk Apr1997 Cs-137 <3.8 0.72 i 2.48;2.48 < 10.0 SPMI-1669 ~
Water Apr1997 Co-60 <3.6 0.86 i 8.38;8.38 < 10.0 SPW-2074 Water Apr1997 Cs-134 <4.7 1.61 1 10.20:10.20 < 10.0
. SPW-2074 Water . Apr1997 Cs-137 <5.0 - 1.80 1 3.20;3.21 < 10.0 SPW-2074 Water Apr1997 Gr. Alpha <0.5 0.12 i 0.31;0.31 < 1.0 SPW-2074 SPW-2074 Water Apr1997 Gr. Beta <1.3 0.46 i 0.72:0.72 <3.2 Water Apr1997 H-3 < 150 12.82 i 75.13;75.15 < 200.0 SPW-2547 SPW-5 Water May1997 Ra-226 <0.03 -0.05 0.02;0.03 < 1.0
< 10.0 SPF 3435 Fish - May1997 Cs-134 <0.015 -0.01 0.00:0.00 l
l l- V-8
(q) Table A-3. In-house " blank" samples.
Concentration pCi/L".
Teledyne Results Acceptance Lab Sample Sample (4.66 Sigma) Criteria Code Type Da te Analysis LLD Activity" (4.66 Sigma)
SPF-3435 Fish May 1997 Cs-137 <0.016 0.00 t o.01:0.01 < 10.0 SPW-6 Water Jun1997 Ra-226 <0.04 -0.04 i 0.03:0.03 < 1.0 SPW-3751 Water Jun1997 I131 <0.3 -0.13 i 0.14;0.15 <0.5 ,
SPMI-3753 Milk Jun1997 I131 <0.3 0.09 i 0.17;0.17 < 0.5 SPCH-3755 Charcoal Jun1997 I-131(g) <0.017 0.01 1 0.01:0.01 < 9.6 Canister SPMI-4217 Milk Jul1997 Co-60 <4.8 -0.39 t l.23; 1.23 < 10.0 SPMI-4217 Milk Jul1997 Cs-134 <3.0 -0.87 1 1.70;1.70 < 10.0 SPMI-4217 Milk Jul1997 Cs-137 <5.9 1.60 i 3.43;3.44 < 10.0
- SPMI-4217 Milk Tul1997 I-131 <0.3 -0.05 i 0.17;0.17 <0,5 SPW-4421 Water ju11997 Co-60 <1.9 -4.66 14.75;4.80 < 10.0 SPW-4421 Water Jul1997 Cs-134 <4.7 -1.45 1 3.09:3.10 < 10.0 SPW-4421 Water Jul1997 Cs-137 <6.7 0.74 i 4.55;4.55 < 10.0 SPMI-4217 Milk Jul1997 Sr-89 <1.5 -0.17 t l.90; 1.90 < 5.0
(~'}
L' SPMI-4217 Milk Jul1997 Sr-90 N, m 1.68 i o.42:0.45 < 1.0 Low level of Sr-90 concentratn in milk (1-5 pCi/L) is not unusual.
SPW-4421 Water Jul1997 St-89 <1.7 0.92 i l.55;1.55 < 5.0 SPW-4421 Water Jul1997 Sr-90 <0.6 0.34 1 0.33;0.33 < 1.0 SPW-5471 Water Jul1997 Fe-55 <733 48.16 1448.32;448.34 < 1000.0 SPW-5473 Water Jul1997 H-3 <161 22.70 58.20;58.28 < 200.0 SPW-5475 Water Jul1997 Gr. Alpha <0.6 0.17 10.43;0.43 < 1.0 SPW-5475 Water Jul1997 Gr. Beta <0.5 0.17 0.47;0.47 < 3.2 SPF-5477 Fish Jul1997 Co-60 <0.011 -0.00 0.00;0.00 < 10.0 SPF-5477 Fish Jul1997 Cs-134 <0.015 0.00 i 0.01;0.01 < 10.0 SPF-5477 Fish Jul1997 Cs-137 <0.018 0.01 i 0.01;0.01 < 10.0 SPW-7501 Water Oct 1997 I-131 <0.4 0.01 i 0.01;0.01 <0.5 SPW-7504 Water Oct 1997 Sr-89 < 1.1 -0.65 i 0.80;0.80 <5.0
. SPW-7504 Water Oct 1997 Sr-90 <0.4 0.15 i 0.21:0.21 < 1.0 SPMI-7507 M11k Oct 1997 Co-60 <6.2 -1.19 i 1.62;1.63 < 10.0 SPMI-7507 Milk Oct 1997 Cs-134 <4.9 1.71 t l.95;1.96 < 10.0 SPMI-7507 Milk Oct1997 Cs-137 <6.5 -0.23 1 3.74;3.74 < 10.0
. SPMI-7507 Milk Oct 1997 I-131 <0.3 -0.02 10.16;0.16 < 0.5 SPMI-7507 Milk Oct 1997 Sr-89 <1.0 0.86 il.11;1.11 < 5.0
()
SPMI-7507 Milk Oct 1997 Sr-90 Low level of Sr-90 concentration in milk (1-5 pCi/L) is not unusual.
N/A 1.03 i 0.32;0.34 < 1.0 V-9
Table A-3. - In-house " blank" samples.
Concentration pCi/L'.'
- Teledyne Results Acceptance l
. Lab Sample - : Sample . (4.66 Sigma)' Criteria l Code Type Date Analysis LLD Activity" (4.66 Sigm'a ) 1
\
. RA-W-11 Watsr Dec 1997 Ra 228 <0.7 ~ 0.1310.32;0.32 - < 1.0 -)
. SPW-9852 Water Dec 1997 Co-60 ' . <2.4 1.6019A6;9A6 < 10.0
'f SPW 9852 Water - Dec 1997 Cs-134 . <5.7 -0.45 i 2.34;2.34 ' < 10.0 J
- SPW-9852 Water . Dec 1997 : Cs-137 <6.0 2.19 1 3.55;3.56 < 10.0
. Liquid sample results are reported in pCi/ Liter, air filter sample resu'lts are in pCi/ filter, charcoal sample.-.
results are in pCi/ charcoal, and solid sample results are in pCi/ kilogram. .J
- The ' activity reported is the net activity result. j i
l l
1 1
I-I' ,
i l
i l'
c ..
l
.J N -
V - 10
1 m
, ) Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' )
Date Lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Analysis Codes' Rejected Result Result Jan,1997 Gr. Beta SW - 42,43 A 3.110.9;1.0 2.5 i0.9;1.0 Jan,1997 I-131 MI - 92,93 A 0.010.2;0.2 0.1 i0.2; 0.2 Jan,1997 K-40 MI - 92,93 A 1,466.8 1 129.0;237.6 1,417.3 1163.0;252.4 f Jan,1997 I-131 WW - 116,117 A 0.110.3;0.3 0.2; 0.2
-0.1 l Jan,1997 I-131 MI- 377,378 A 0.110.2;0.2 6.1i0.3;0.3 Jan,1997 Sr-89 MI - 377,378 A -0.410.8;0.8 -0.3 i0.8;0.8 3 Jan,1997 Sr-90 MI - 377,378 A 1.0i0.4;0.4 1.0 0.3;0.3 I Jan,1997 K-40 MI- 377,378 A 1,379.5 i l22.0;223.8 1,304.8 1 113.0;210.4 Jan,1997 Gr. Beta SWU - 389,390 A 2.8 t o.5;0.7 2.7 0.5;0.7 Jan,1997 H-3 SWU - 389,390 A 158.6 194.9;97.3 125.0 1 93.6;95.1 l
Feb,1997 I-131 MI - 486,487 A -0.1 i0.2;0.2 -0.1 0.2; 0.2 Feb,1997 Sr-89 MI- 486,487 A -0.811.0;1.0 -0.5 0.o,0.9 '
Feb,1997 Sr-90 MI- 486,487 A 1.810.5;0.5 1.5 i0.5; 0.5 Feb,1997 K-40 MI- 486,487 A 1,278.2 i 167.0;241.1 1,316.5 i141.0;227.9 Feb,1997 I-131 MI- 531,532 A 0.010.2;0.2 -0.0 i0.2; 0.2 K-40 MI- 531,532 A 1,300.3 i l78.0;250.9 6eb,1997 1,488.5 156.0;255.6 Feb,1997 I131 MI- 632,633 A -0.310.2;0.2 0.2; 0.2
-0.1 Feb,1997 K-40 MI - 632,633 A 1,408.0 165.0;252.8 1,243.1 145.0;222.7 Feb,1997 I-131 MI - 723,724 A -0.110.2;0.2 0.210.3;0.3 Feb,1997 K-40 MI- 723,724 A 1,574.8 i 218.0;305.6 1,396.8 1162.0;249.7 !
Jan,1997 Gr. Alpha CW - 846,847 A 0.0 i0.5; 0.5 0.710.5;0.5 l Jan,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 846,847 A 1.310.5;0.6 2.1 0.5; 0.6 i Jin,1997 Sr-89 CW - 846,847 A 0.4 i0.5;0.5 0.710.9;0.9 l Jan,1997 Sr-90 CW - 846,847 A 0.1 0.2; 0.2 0.7 i 0.4;0.4 Jan,1997 H-3 CW - 846,847 A 1,518.5 i 131.0;244.6 1,631.8 r.134.1:259.3 Feb,1997 Gr. Beta SWU - 929,930 A 2.5 i0.6; 0.7 3.0i0.7;0.8 Feb,1997 H-3 SWU - 929,930 A 170.1 1 84.6;87.7 202.3 i85.9;90.2 Feb,1997 H-3 WW - 979, 980 A 102.1 92.1;93.1 12.S i 88.3;88.4 Feb,1997 Gr. Deta DW - 1030,1031 A 2.110.5;0.6 2.1i0,5;0.6 Fcb,1997 I-131 DW - 1030,1031 A -0.210.3;0.3 -0.110.3;0.3 M:r,1997 Gr. Beta SW - 1036,1037 A 1.8 i0.7; 0.8 2.1 i0.7; 0.8 Mar,1997 I-131 MI - 1055,1056 A 0.1 i0.2; 0.2 0.0 i0.2; 0.2 Mar,1997 K-40 MI- 1055,1056 A 1,452.9 1126.0;234.3 1,530.3 i l24.0;242.3 Mar,1997 Gr. Beta LW - 1120,1121 A 2.6 0.6;0.7 1.9 iO.6; 0.7 Mar,1997 I-131 MI- 1158,1159 A 0.010.2;0.2 0.1 i0.2; 0.2 I Mar,1997 K-40 MI - 1158,1159 A 1,523.5 i l52.0;257.0 1,418.5 1157.0;248.7 V - 11
o Table A-4. ' In'-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/l' Date.- ~ Lab l Accepted' ' - Firsti Second - -
- Collected Analysis Codes * - Rejected . ; Result - ' Result 2 Mar,1997- ' I-131i MI- 1275,12761 >
'A -0.1 i0.2;0.2 0.410.5;0.5 Mar,1997 K-40 i ' MI- 1275,1276 A- 1,491.1 i 193.0;280.0 1,754.0 177.0;297.0 Feb,1997.- H-3 . : SW - 1370,1371l A. 50.7 178.9;79.2 -8.1 i 76.3;76.3 Mar,19971GrJ Beta ' SWT - 1519,1520 A 2.5 t0.6;0.7 ' 2.110.6;0.7 Mar,1997 . Gr. Beta" ;WW [1539,1540 .. A- 1.3 i0.7;0.7 1.810.7;0.8 Mar,1997 : ;H 3- WW - 1539,1540 - A -34.5 1 72.6;72.8 - 41.4 1 76.2;76.4 Apr,1997_ _ I 2131' 1 MI- 1641,1642 3 A' -0.7i0.3;0.3
-0.6 i0.3;0.3
- Apr,1997_ ._ K MI- 1641,1642 A 1,556.3 1 111.0;239.0- 1,393.1 i 160.0;248.0 Apr,1997 r I-131: . WW - 1665,1666 A -0.410.3;0.3 -0.010.3;0.3 Mar,1997 - . H-3 ' LW - 1931,1932 ~ A' 169.0 i 83.1;86.2 137.7i81.8j 83.9 ;
Apr,1997 Co-60[ AP - 1994,1995. -A- -0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0i0.0j0.0 '
!Apr,1997 Cs-134 AP- 1994,1995 -A -0.0i0.0;0.0 -0.0 i0.0;0.0
- Apr,1997 Cs-137 AP - 199'4,1995 A -0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 i Apr,1997 .' I 131(g) . AP - 1994,1995 A --0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0
. Mar,1997 Gr. Beta DW - 1688,1689 A 4.5 t i.4;1.5_ 4.7 t1.3;1.5 ar,1997 I131 DW .1688,1689 A ~ -0.2 i0.4 ;0.4 0.3 i0.3;0.3 eb,1997 ,I-131- MI- 510,511 A 0.1 i0.2;0.2 0.010.2;0.2
-Jan,1997 lH 3. WW - 322,323 - A -5.4180.7;80.7 -14.5 i 80.3;80.3 Feb,1997 H-3 WW - 576,577 A 151.0 84.1;86.6 241.2 187.9;93.8 Mar,1997 H-3 WW - 1309,1310 _A 4,282.8 i 188.1;612.1 4,034.5 t183.5;578.6
. Apr,1997 H-3 WW - 1737,1738 {i A 13.8 i 75.3;75.3 -5.2174.4;74.4 Jan,1997 Gr. Beta _ CW - 355,356 A -0.4 il.3; 1.3 .0.411.4;1.4
. Jan,'1997. Gr. Beta CW - 299,300 A 0.211.4;1.4 0.711.4;1.4 [
'. Jr.n,1997, Gr.' Beta CW - 416,417 - A 0.1 1.3;1.3 0.711.4;1.4
'Feb,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 554,555 A ' 0.5 t l.0;1.0 0.211.0;1.0
- Mar,1997 Gr. Beta - CW - 1187,1188 A 0.1 i1.5;1.5 -0.1 il.5;1.5 Jan,19971 Gr. Beta
- LW - 146,147 A 7.0il.4;1.8 7.9 i t.6; 2.0 Jan,1997 Gr. Beta - LW - 224,225 ' A 6.3 il.4;1.7 7.4 i t.5;1.9
. Jan,1997 ' Gr.- Beta ' CW - 355,356 A- 3.lil.4;1.5 2.1 t l.5;1.5 r
. Jan,1997 '. Gr. Beta CW - 299,300 A 2.51.1;1.2 2.8 i1.5;1.5
' Jan,1997.. ' Gr. Beta . A
- CW ~- 416,417f 3.7t l.3:1.4 4.511.1;1.3 a Jan,1997 : Gr. Beta PW - 607,608 A 5.7i1.9;2.1 5.6 i t .8; 2.0 Feb,1997 Gr. Beta : CW - 883,884 A 1.3ii.3;1.3 2.311.4;1.4 Feb,1997 Gr. Beta . CW - 554,555 A 3.7 tl.5;1.6 2.811.5;1.6 i Feb,1997. Gr. Beta LW - 757,758 A 3.7i0.9;1.1 4.1 i t.0;1.2 Mar,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 1187,1188 A 4.8 it.9;2.1 3.511.8;1.9 l .
V - 12 1
Q j-r b Table' A-4. In-house " duplicate" program. '
Concent ation'in pCi/L
' Lab . E
-Date . . Accepted First . Second L Collected' Analysis ~
Codes * ~ ' Rejected Result ' Result ~
Mar,1997 Gr. Beta ' LW - 953,954 .A 3.7i t.0;1.2 4.7 il.0; 1.2 -
Mar,1997g Cr. Beta - LW - 1145,1146 A. 4.211.2;1.4- ~ 3.611.2;1.4 -
L Jan,1997 Cs-137 . SW - 441,' 442 A. 0.1 2.4;2.4 - 3.0 i2.8;2.9 I '
..Jan,1997 . Cs-137, 'MI - 19,20 A -0.9i2.8;2.8 - 2.4 i t .9;1.9 Jan,1997. Cs 137 MI - 63,64 A 0.4 i2.1;2.1 0.7i 1.4 ; 1.4 -
Jan,1997 C3-137 LW - 146,147 A -0.812.2;2.2 0.2 3.5;3.5 '
Jan,1997 Cs-137 LW - 224,225 A- -1.013.4;3.4 1.511.7;1.7 Feb,1997 Cs-137- MI- 510,511 A 0.8 i2.6;2.6 2.213.3;3.3 iJan,1997_. '.Cs-137 PW - 607,608 l 'A -0.7i2.6;2.6 0.3 i3.1:3.1 -
Mar,1997 : Cs-137 LW - 953,954 - A ' 0.312.3;2.3
.1.6 i2.7;2.7 -
~ Mar,1997 Cs-137 LW - 1145,1146 A- 1.6 i3.3;3.3 - '0.914.1;4.1
.Jan,1997 Co-60 . SW - 441,442 A- .-0.2 1.3;1.3 0.3 i0.3;0.3 Jan,1997: . Co-60 MI- 19,20 A 2.8i2.6;2.6 1.4 i2.5;2.5 '
"Jan,1997: Co-60 MI - 63, 64 . A 0.9 i2.6;2.6 'O.811.4;1.4 JJan,1997 Co-60 LW - 146,147 'A. -0.2 t o.5;0.5 1.9 i16.9;16.9 fan,1997 Co-60 LW - 224,225 -A' 1.8 i4.3;4.3 -1.210.9;0.9-Feb,1997 . Co MI- 510,511 A ' O.7il.0;1.0 -2.214.1;4.2-lJan,1997 Co-60 PW - 607,608 A -0.5 i0.6;0.6 0.8 i2.4;2.4 Mar,1997 Co-60 '- LW - 953,954 ~ A >
0.711.8;1.8' -1,33.9;3.9
. Mar,1997 Co-60 LW - 1145,1146 A 1.513.3;3.3 3.717.0;7.0
. Mar,1997 Sr-89 SW - 1576,1577 - A -0.5 il .1,1.1 -0.6 i1.0;1.0
~ Mar,1997 Sr-90 .. SW - 1576,1577 A' O.7i0.3;0.4 0.7i0.3;0.3
!- ' Mar,1997 ' SW - 1576,1577 A H 219.7 84.1;89.2 250.8 i 85.4;91.9
. Apr,1997 Gr. Beta WW - 1708,1709 A 1.210.6;0.6. -1.310.6;0.6 Apr,1997 Gr. Beta . LW - 1763,1761 A 2.410.8;0.9 2.210.8;0.9.
Apr,1997 . H-3 : LW - 1763,1764 A 97.1 t79.3;80.4 160.4 1 82.0;84.9 Apr,1997 - Gr. Beta- . WW - 1785,1786 A 2.9 i2.1;2.1 0.4 i2.1;2.1 LApr,1997 - Sr-89 , WW - 1785,1786 A 0.710.7;0.7 -0.510.5;0.5 Apt,1997 . Sr-90 ~ WW - 1785,1786 A -0.0 i0.2;0.2 0.210.2;0.2
- Apr,1997 - H3 WW - 1785,1786 A -19.0 173.S;73.8 -74.4 1 71.1;71.8
. Apr,1997 I-131 MI- 1845,1846 A -0.3 i0.2;0.2 -0.1 i0.'2; 0.2
- Apr,1997 Sr-89 MI- 1845,1846 - A 0.3il.3;1.3 -0.3t0.8;0.8.
' Apr,1997 ' Sr-90 c M1- 1845,1846 A' 1.410.4;0.4 0.910.2;0.2 Apr,1997 K-40 MI- 1845,1846 - 'A IJ92.5 tS2.5;222.9 1,559.3 1127.0;247.2
- Apr,1997 - lCo-60 MI- 1845,1846' A 0.0i0.1;0.1 -1.9122.4;22.4 Apr,1997 : Cs-134 ; MI- 1845,1846 A 0.2 i0.1;0.1 0.6 i2.3;2.3 n g V - 13
,J
l I
1 i
/~
k)T Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Apr,1997 Cs-137 MI- 1845,1846 A 0.811.2;1.2 0.612.7;2.7 Apr,1997 I-131(g) MI- 1845,1846 A -0.110.3;0.3 -0.713.3;3.3 Apr,1997 Sr-89 AP - 1974,1975 A -0.0i0.0;0.0 -0.0 i0.0;0.0 Apr,1997 Sr-90 AP - 1974,1975 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 '
Apr,1997 K-40 AP - 1994,1995 A 0.00.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Mar,1997 St-89 SWU - 2045,2046 A -0.0 i0.7;0.7 0.1 0.6;0.6 Mar,1997 Sr 90 SWU - 2045,2046 A 0.4 i0.3;0.3 l 0.210.3;0.3 Apr,1997 Gr. Beta SWU - 2091,2092 A 3.3 i0.7;0.8 2.710.7;0.8 Apr,1997 H-3 SWU - 2091,2092 A 42.6 i 76.3;76.5 46.1 176.4;76.7 Apr,1997 Gr. Alpha F - 2175,2176 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.110.0;0.0 Apr,1997 Gr. Beta F - 2175,2176 A 2.3 i0.3; 0.4 1.710.4;0.4
- Apr,1997 Sr-89 F - 2175,2176 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 l Apr,1997 Sr-90 F - 2175,2176 A ' 0.0i0.0;0.0
-0.010.0;0.0 Apr,1997 K-40 F - 2175,2176 A 2.50.4;0.4 2.510.4;0.4 K-40 F - 2412,2413 A 3.0 i0.2;0.3 3.1 0.1;0.3
[_Apr,1997 pr,1997 K-40 SL - 2432,2433 A 1.8 i0.4;0.5 1.7 i0.5; 0.6
)Apr,1997 Gr. Beta LW - 2550,2551 A 2.00.8;0.9 3.710.9;1.1 j
i Apr,1997 K-40 LW - 2550,2551 A 102.8 155.6;56.5 96.7 54.9;55.7 Apr,1997 H-3 SWU - 2636,2637 A 17.9 1 75.4;75.5 92.4 i 78.8;79.8 !
May,1997 Cr. Deta SW - 2657,2658 A 13.311.3;2.4 13.2 il.3;2.4 Apr,1997 Gr. Alpha SP - 2806,2807 A 0.00.4;0.4 0.1 i0.4;0.4 Apr,1997 Sr-89 SP - 28%,2807 A -1.4 6.8;6.8 -5.6 t 8.6;8.6 Apr,1997 Sr-90 SP - 2806,2807 A 2.7i2.3;2.3 7.2 i3.0;3.1 May,1997 I-131 MI - 2828,2829 A -0.010.3;0.3 -0.1 i0.2;0.2 l
May,1997 K-40 MI - 2828,2829 A 1,786.4 1126.0;273.7 1,897.0 i 192.0;321.6 j Apt,1997 Gr. Beta LW - 2848,2849 A 2.410.6;0.7 1.710.6;0.6 !
May,1997 Gr, Beta G - 2879,2880 A 6.5 i0.2;0.7 6.6 i0.2; 0.7 I May,1997 K-40 G - 2879,2880 A 6.3 i0.8;1.0 5.8 i 0.7;0.9 !
May,1997 Co-60 G - 2879,2880 A 0.010.1;0.1 -0.0 i0.2;0.2 May,1997 Cs-134 G - 2879,2880 A 0.0 i0.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 May,1997 Cs-137 G - 2879,2880 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1997 I-131(g) G - 2879,2880 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.0 0.7;0.7 Miy,1997 Gr. Beta S O - 2904, 2905 A 24.512.4;3.4 26.512.6;3.7 May,1997 K-40 S O - 2904,2905 A 18.811.0;2.1 19.2 t o.9;2.1 May,1997 Co-60 S O - 2904,2905 A -0.010.0;0.0 -0.0 i0.0; 0.0 g May,1997 Cs-134 S O - 2904, 2905 A 0.010.1;0.1 0.0 0.2;0.2 i
%;)
l V - 14 l
Table A-4.' In-house "dupiicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Da t'e .-Lab Accepted' First Second Collected A'nalysis ' Codes
- Rejected . Result Result May,1997 .Cs-137 S O - 2904, 2905 A . 0.3 i0.1;0.1 0.310.0;0.1
' May,1997 Sr-89 ' MI- 3050,3051 A -0.210.9;0.9 0.0 i0.9;0.9 -
May,' 1997 Sr-90 MI- 3050,3051 A 1.010.4;0.4 0.910.4;0.4
'May,1997 K-40 G - 3090,3091 A 'i.1 t ot'16 5.0i0.3;0.6 May,1997 I131 MI- 3232,3233 A- .,.4 2,0.2 -0.310.2:0.2 May,1997 K-40 MI- 3232,3233 A~ 1,550.6 i121.0;243.1 1,517.9 i141.0;250.0 l May,1997 . I-131 WW - 3395,3396 A -0.210.2;0.2 -0.00.2;0.2 May;1997 K-40 F - 3484,3485 A 2.510.3;0.4 1.810.3;0.4 May,1997 '. K-40 F- 3720,3721 A 2.6 i0.4;0.5 2.710.3;0.4 Jun,1997 'H3 P 3794,3795 A 109.9 i 93.1;94.3 24.2 189.6;89.7
- Jun,1997 Gr. Alpha .VE - 3839,3840 A 0.2 i0.1;0.1 0.210.1;0.1 Jun,1997 _Gr. Beta VE - 3'839,3840 A 4.510.4;0.6 4.1 i0.4;0.6
-Jun,1997 ~ K-40 VE - 3839,3840 ' A 5.410.3;0.6 4.710.4;0.6 May,1997 H-3 SW - 3883,3884 A -20.5 87.8;87.8 124.9 i 93.7;95.3
-Jun,1997 I-131 MI- 3903,3904 A 0.2i0.2;0.2 -0.1 0.2;0.2 1997 K-40 MI- 3903,3904 A 2,020.1 i142.0;309.3 1,822.5 188.0;311.1 Jun,1997 Gr. Beta F - 3928,3929 A 2.7i0.1;0.3 2.6 i0.1;0.3 Jun,1997 K-40 F - 3928,3929 A 1.9 0.4;0.4 1.5 i0.4;0.4 Jun,1997 Co-60 F - 3928,3929 A -0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0-Jun,1997; Cs-134 F - 3928,3929 A. 0.0 i0.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1997 ' Cs 137 F - 3928,3929 A 0.1*0.0;0.0 0.110.0;0.0 Jun,1997- I-131(g) F- 3928,3929 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0i0.0;0.0
'Jun,1997- K-40 F - 4049,4050 . A 2.810.4;0.5 3.010.2;0.4
-Jun,1997 Gr. Beta SWT - 4240,4241 A 2.110.6;0.7 2.9i0.6;0.8 Jul,1997 H-3 DW - 4510,4511 A 1.2 i 80.7;80.7 21.4 181.6;81.7 Mar,1997 Gr. Deta CW - 1599,1600 A 1.lil.0;1.0 1.0 i l.0; 1.0
- Mar,1997 Cr. Beta CW- 1599,1600 A 3.4 i t.6;1.7 3.4 il.5;1.6
- Apr,1997 Gr. Beta WW - 1737,1738 A 15.011.5;2.8 15.711.6;2.9 Mar,1997 H-3 CW - 1909,1910 A 435.8 96.5;113.2 430.4 i 96.3;112.7 Apr,1997 H-3 WW - 2462,2463 A 19.6 i 75.4;75.5 -21.9 i 73.5;73.6 i Apr,1997 ~ . Cs-137 - WW - 2462,2463 A 0.613.7;3.7 -1.5 i3.4 ; 3.4
. Apr,1997 . Co-60 L WW - 2462,2463 A -0.510.8;0.8 0.5 i0.8;0.8 o Mer,1997. Cs-137 AP- 2572,2573 A 0.00.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0;0.0 Mir,1997 . Co-60 AP - 2572,2573 A -0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 Apr,1997 H-3 WW - 2712,2713 A 1,482.0 il25.7;237.5 1,596.1 1 128.8:252 4 >
pr,1997 Gr. Beta PW - 2736,2737 A 2.8 il.5;1.6 2.711.4;1.5 V - 15
\
i i
K_l Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program. 1 Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Second i Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result I Apr,1997 Cs-137 PW - 2736, 2737 A -0.3 i4.2;4.2 1.'73.3;3.3 Apr,1997 Co-60 PW - 2736,2737 A 0.1 i4.7;4.7 -0.619.8;9.8 May,1997 I131 MI - 2764,2765 A -0.2 i0.2;0.2 0.1;0.1
-0.1 May,1997 Cs-137 MI - 2764,2765 A 5.5 iS.3; 5.3 1.815.0;5.0 May,1997 Co-60 MI- 2764,2765 A 0.1 0.1; 0.1 -1.5 i 7.2; 7.2 May,1997 Cs-137 F - 2926,2927 A -0.010.0;0.0 -0.0 i 0.0;0.0 May,1997 Co-60 F - 2926,2927 A 0.010.0;0.0 -0.0 0.0;0.0 May,1997 Cs-137 F - 3070,3071 A 0.010.0;0.0 -0.0 i0.0;0.0 !
May,1997 Co-60 F - 3070,3071 A -0.010.1;0.1 0.010.0;0.0 May,1997 I-131 MI - 3116, 3117 A -0.1 0.2;0.2 -0.1 0.2; 0.2 May,1997 Cs-137 BS - 3311,3312 A 0.1 0.0;0.0 0.1 i0.0;0.0 ,
May,1997 Co-60 BS - 3311, 3312 A -0.00.0;0.0 -0.0 i0.0;0.0 May,1997 Gr. Beta LW - 3464,3465 A 3.4 il .0;1.1 3.8 il.0; 1.1 May,1997 Cs-137 LW - 3464,3465 A 2.512.8;2.8 1.5 i3.2;3.2 May,1997 Co-60 LW - 3464,3465 A -0.3 il .3; 1.3
[
-0.1 0.0;0.0 4ay,1997 H-3 SW - 3533, 3534 A -95.4 190.4;91.4 -117.7 i89.5;90.9 Jun,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 3948,3949 A -0.411.1;1.1 -0.4 i l .1; 1.1 Jun,1997 I-131 MI - 4091,4092 A -0.010.1;0.1 -0.010.2;0.2 Jun,1997 H-3 SW - 4150, 4151 A 30.4 77.2;77.3 56.0 1 78.4;78.8 Jun,1997 H-3 SW - 4364,4365 A 83.4 i 83.9;84.7 94.4 184.4;85.4 Jun,1997 H-3 SW - 5186,5187 A 190.3 189.7;93.4 192.2 189.8;93.5 Jun,1997 H-3 CW - 5207,5208 A 151.6 i88.1;90.5 135.0 i87.4;89.3 Mar,1997 H-3 SW - 2204,2205 A 62.0 il52.0;152.2 112.0 il52.0;152.8 May,1997 Gr. Beta S O - 2677, 2678 A 22.0 i2.8;?.5 21.8 i 3.1;3.8 May,1997 St-89 S O - 2677, 2678 A 0.010.1;0.1 -0.0 i0.1; 0.1 May,1997 St-90 S O - 2677, 2678 A 0.110.0;0.0 0.1 0.0;0.0 May,1997 H-3 SW - 3008, 3009 A 101.3 i91.6;92.6 123.3 92.4;94.0 May,1997 Gr. Beta F - 3277,3278 A 2.9 i0.1;0.3 3.0 i 0.1;0.3 May,1997 K-40 F - 3277, 3278 A 2.810.3;0.4 2.5 0.3;0.4 Jun,1997 I131 MI- 3513,3514 A -0.210.2;0.2 -0.1 0.2;0.2 Jun,1997 K-40 MI- 3513,3514 A 1,560.3 il29.0;248.3 1,521.9 179.0;273.6 Jun,1997 Gr. Beta SWU - 3980,3981 A 2.1 i0.6;0.7 2.3 0.6; 0.7 Jun,1997 H-3 SWU - 3980,3981 A 221.0 i 89.9;94.8 105.6 i 85.1;86.3 Jun,1997 Gr. Alpha DW - 4280,4281 A -0.Si0.8;0.8 -0.5 i0.8;0.8 f Jun,1997 Gr. Beta DW - 4280,4281 A 2.110.9;0.9 2.1 i 0.9;0.9 Gr. Beta SW - 4460,4461 A 1.8 i0.8;0.8 2.310.8;0.9 l
g l,1997 V - 16 b
I Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab {
Accepted' First Collected Analysis Codes
- Second Rejected Result Jun,1997 . Gr. Beta Result '
DW - 4484,4485 A 2.110.6;0.7 Jun,1997 1.9 i0.6; 0.7 H-3 DW - 4484,4485 A 39.3 183.2;83.4 66.9 i S4.5;84.9 l Jul,1997 K-40 BS - 4573, 4574 A 12.010.6;1.3 12.1 iC.5;1.3 Jul,1997 Gr. Deta G - 4745,4746 A f 5.0i0.2;0.5 Jul,1997 K-40 4.810.2:0.5 G - 4745,4746 A 4.6 i0.6; 0.7 4.20.6;0.7 Jul,1997 Co-60 . G - 4745,4746 A. 0.0i0.10.1 -0.010.0;0.0 l Jul,1997 Cs-134 G - 4745,4746 A 0.0 i0.0;0.0 -0.00.1;0.1 Jul,1997 Cs-137 G - 4745,4746 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jul,1997 I-131(g) G - 4745,4746 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1997 H-3 WW - 4811,4812 A 48.5 83.7;84.0 50.3 183.8;84.1
~ Jul,1997 Gr. Beta SWU - 4832,4833 A [
2.810.7;0.8 3.410.7;0.8 Jul,1997 I-131 MI - 4897,4898 A 4
-0.010.2;0.2 0.0-1 0.2;0.2 Jul,1997 K-40 MI- 4897,4898 l A 1,531.3 i l23.0;241.9 1,270.5 1152.0;230.1 Jul,1997 K-40 AP - 4917,4918 A 0.00.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0;0.0 Jul,1997 Co-60 AP - 4917,4918 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.00.0;0.0 1,1997 Cs-134 AP - 4917,4918 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0;0.0 ul,1997 Cs-137 AP - 4917,4918 A 0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.0i0.0;0.0 Jul,1997 I-131(g) AP - 4917,4918 A -0.0 i0.0; 0.0 0.00,1;0.1 Jul,1997 Gr. Alpha SP - 5024,5025 A 0.4 il .0;1.0 l 1.811.2;1.3 Jul,1997 Sr-90 SP - 5024,5025 A 65.917.3;9.8 61.7 i 6.2;8.7 Jul,1997 I131 M1 - 5464,5465 j A -0.310.3;0.3 0.410.3;0.3 Jul,1997 K-40 MI- 5464,5465 {
A 1,282.9 1143.0;225.6 1,380.0 1 124.0;224.9 Jul,1997 Gr. Deta VE - 5506,5507 A 7.3 i0.2;0.8 f 7.00.2;0.7 l Jul,1997 K-40 VE - 5506,5507 A 8.2 i0.4;0.9 8.210.4;0.9 Aug,1997 Gr. Beta SW - 5584,5585 A 3.010.8;0.9 l
2.011.0;1.1 I Aug,1997 K-40 G - 5653,5654 A 6.0i0.6;0.8 5.610.6;0.8 Aug,1997 Cr. Beta LW - 5678,5679 A f 2.710.7;0.8 2.4 i0.6;0.7 Aug,1997 I-131 !
LW - 5678,5679 A -0.110.3;0.3 -0.110.3;0.3 l Aug,1997 K-40 LW - 5678,5679 A 137.0 116.5;21'.4 124.0 t 17.3;21.3 Aug,1997 Co-60 LW - 5678,5679 $
A 0.4ti.3;1.3 0.7 1.5; 1.5 Aug,1997 Cs-134 LW- 5678,5679 A 0.8 i0.7;0.7 0.810.5;0.5 Aug,1997 Cs-137 LW - 5678,5679 A 1.111.2;1.2 0.811.2;1.2 Aug,1997 I-131(g) LW - 5678,5679 A -10.1 1 11.1;11.2 -3.615.8;5.8 Jel,1997 H-3 WW - 5848,5849 A 51.6 i 83.5;83.8
)
40.4 183.0;83.2 2 Aug,1997 I-131 MI- 5891,5892 A 0.010.2;0.2 0.2 i0.2;0.2 ;
Aug K-40 MI-5891,5892 A 1,438.6 i 131.0;235.5 1,218.6 t175.0;241.0 O,1997 V - 17
L t
s si y Table A-4. Inihouse " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Da te - Lab . Accepted
- First.
Collected Analysis - Second .
p Codesk ; Rejected Result i. Result
'. Aug,1997 ; 1-131 : MI-5926,5927 , A. -0.010.2;0.2 -0.1 t 0.2;0.2 Aug,1997 . K-40 ~ . MI-5926,5927 , A: 1,577.8 1216.0;304.5- 1,429.9 1178.0;263.6'
{ Aug,1997 H-3 SW'O - 5972,5973 A- 274.8 193.7;100.9 157.3 188.9;91.4 l Aug,1997 Gr.' Beta SL - 6034,6035 A . 2.2i0.2;0.3 : 2.0 i0.2:0.3 Aug,1997- K-40 SL- 6034,6035 A 1.6 i0.3;0.3 ' 1.510.3;0.3 Aug,1997 - Co-60 SL - 6034,6035 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.3;0.3 Aug,1997 Cs-134 ' SL - 6034,6035. A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0;0.0
- Aug,1997
- Cs-137 SL - 6034,6035 A' O.0i0.0;0.0 0.0 t0.0;0.0 Aug,1997 -: I-131(g) : SL - 6034,6035 A -0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0
- Aug,1997 Gr. Beta VE - 6251,6252 A 3.5i0.1;0.4 -
3.510.1;0.4 Aug,1997 K-40 VE - 6251,6252 A 3.9i0.5;0.7 3.410.6;0.7 1 Aug,1997. 1131 MI- 6335,6336 A 0.0i0.3;0.3 0.110.3;0.3 Aug,1997 . K-40 . ~ MI- 6335,6336 A- 1,488.7 i l28.0;239.5 1,538.6 il16.0:239.3
- Sep,1997 Gr. Beta ' LW - 6520,6521 'A 2.0i0.6;0.6 - 2.4 i0.6;0.7 4
_ Sep,1997 H-3 LW - 6520,6521 .A. 104.7 87.9;89.0 66.4 186.2;86.6' Mug,1997 Gr. Alpha LW -'6560,6561 A' O.510.4;0.4 j
0.810.3;0.4 l dug,1997 Gr. Beta LW - 6560,6561 A' 1.7i0.4;0.4 1.610.3;0.4 Aug,1997 H-3 LW - 6560,6561 A 164.1 1 90.4;93.1 131.6 i89.0;90.8
- 0.3; 0.3 -0.210.3:0.3
- Jul,1997.' ' H-3 - WW - 4535,4536- A 565.2 i103.9;129.2 524.8 i102.4;124.8 Jul,1997.- .H 3 WW - 5369,5370 A 18,013.9 i373.4;2,478.2 18,133.9,1374.6;2,494.5
. Jul,1997 - H-3 WW - 5348,5349 A
~
1,763.0 i 140.0;277.7 1,813.2 t 141.3;284.2 Aug,1997 H-3 WW - 5529,5530 A 235.6 19*. 6;97.0 372.5 i97.7:110.0
~ Aug,1997 H-3 WW - 6312,6313 A 4,401.7 1200.9;631.4 4,585.8 i 204.4;656.3 Sep,1997 H-3 W W "408,7409 A 7,907.0 1 264.0;1,101.3 7,543.3 1 258.5;1,058.0 Oct,1997 H-3 WW - 7648,7649 A 241.3 i105.7;110.7 265.5 1106.6;112.6
- Aug,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 5759,5760 A -0.6 i t.1;1.1 -0.0il.1 ; 1.1
. Jul,1997 ' Gr. Beta y CW - 5150,5151 A -0.211.1;1.1 0.5 i t.2;1.2
Jul,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 5321,5322 A -0.6 ti.1;1.1 0.5 i t.2;1.2 LAug,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 6172,6173 A 1.2 i t.3;1.3 0.011.1;1.1
- Aug,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 6013,6014 A -0.611.1;1.1 -0.6il.1;1.1
!^ :
Sep,1997 Gr. Beta . CW - 6796,6797 A -1.1 ii.0;1.0 -0.811.1;1.1 l Aug,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 6080,6081 A -0.011.2;1.2
)
1.0 i t.2; 1.2
.Sep,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 6907,6908 A -0.011.2;1.2 -0.2 i l.1 ;1.1 Oct,1997 ' Gr. Beta e CW - 7339,7340 A 0.3ti.2;1.2 -0.310.9;0.9 V - 18
! 1 l
l Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program.
1 Concentration in pCi/L' l
Date Lab Accepted
- First Second Collected Analysis Codes' Rejected Result Result Sep,1997 C r. Deta CW - 7177,7178 ' A -1.111.0;1.0 -0.111.2;1.2 Oct,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 8100,8101 A -0.6i0.9;0.9 1.0 i t.2:1.2 j Jul,1997 C r. Beta LW - 4782,4783 'A 4.011.0;1.2 '
3.511.0;1.1 Aug,1997 Gr. Beta WW - 5529,5530 A 5.2 i2.2;2.3 4.4 2.0:2.1 Jul,1997 Gr. Beta ' CW - 5321,5322 A 1.611.4;1.4 1.411.3;1.3 Jul,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 5150,5151 A 4.7il.6;1.7 4.311.7;1.8 l Aug,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 5759,5760 A 4.3 il .G; 1.7 2.011.5;1.5 l Aug,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 5708,' 5709 A 1.7il .4;1.4 1.9 il.4;1.4 Aug,1997 C r. Beta CW - 6080,6081 A 2.4 i1.6;1.6 4.0 1.5; 1.7 Sep,1997 Gr. Beta l CW - 6489, 6490 A 0.211.3;1.3 1.9 1.3;1.4 Sep,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 6796,6797 A 3.411.6;1.6 5.0 i t.2;1.4 Aug,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 6013,6014 A 5.011.3;1.5 4.6tl.6;1.8 Aug,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 6172,6173 A 3.311.1;1.2 3.7 1.6;1.7 Sep,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 6907,6908 A 3.811.6;1.7 4.5 i 1.7; 1.8 Oct,1997 Gr. Deta CW - 8100,8101 A 4.111.6;1.7 4.6 i t .6;1.7 ct,1997 Gr. Beta CW - 7560,7561 A 3.8 il .5;1.6 3.8 il.5; 1.6 un,1997 Cs-137 AP - 5004,5005 A -0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1997 Cs-137 AP - 4983,4984 A C.0i0.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 p Jul,1997 Cs-137 LW - 4782,4783 A 0.7i3.2;3.2 -0.612.3;2.3 L Jul,1997 Cs-137 WW - 4535,4536 A -0.72.4;2.4 0.2 i3.3;3.3 Aug,1997 Cs-137 VE - 6106,6107 A 0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 Aug,1997 .Cs-137 VE - 6149,6150 A -0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Aug,1997 Cs-137 MI- 6203,6204 A 0.6 i3.0;3.0 1.3 i 2.7;2.7 Aug,1997 Cs-137 VE - 6224,6225 A -0.0 i0.0; 0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1997 Cs-137 VE - 7141,7142 A -0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0;0.0 Oct,1997 Cs-137 F - 7474,7475 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1997 Cs-137 WW - 7408,7409 A -0.2 il.7;1.7 0.8 3.1 ; 3.1 Oct,1997 Cs-137 WW - 7648,7649 A 2.9i2.3;2.3 0.5 i 1.9;1.9 Oct,1997 Cs-137 F - 7495,7496 A 0.0 i0.0;0.0 0.0 i0.0;0.0 Jun,1997 Co-60 AP - 5004,5005 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0i0.0;0.0 Jun,1997. Co-60 AP - 4983,4984 A -0.0iO.0; 0.0 0.0i0.0;0.0 Jul,1997 Co-60 LW - 4782,4783 A 2.8 i 20.3;20.3 2.06.7;6.7 Jul,1997 Co-60 WW - 4535,4536 A -0.1 i0.5;0.5 1.1 i l.5;1.5 Aug,1997 Co-60 VE - 6106,6107 A 0.0 i0.0; 0.0 0.0 0.0; 0.0 Aug,1997 Co-60 VE - 6149,6150 A 0.0i0.2;0.2 0.0 t 0.0;0.0 Aug,1997 Co-60 MI- 6203,6204 A 2.3 i 83.8;83.8 0.812.0;2.0 9
V - 19
i fy
,1 Table A-4.~ In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted * .Ftrst' Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Second' Result Aug,1997 Co-60. VE 6224,6225 Result j A. 0.0i0.0;0.0
- Sep,1997 Co VE - 7141,7142 0.0 0.0;0.0 .
A- !0.010.0;0.0
, Oct,1997 Co-60 F - 7474,7475 ' -0.0 i 0.0;0.0
'A- .-0.0 i0.0; 0.0.
Sep,1997 . Co-60 WW - 7408,7409 0.010.0;0.0 A, 0.410.8;0.8 Oct,1997 Co-60 '- WW - 7648,7649 2.016.7;6.7-A- - 38.3 i 4.3;7.0 Oct,1997 Co-60 ' F - 7495,7496 31.713.4;5.7
' A. 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.1:0.1'
' All concentrations are reported in pCi/L, except solid samples, w! ich are reported in pC .
6 reported as ActivityiCounting Error; Total Propagated Uncertainty (TPU).
.protect Lab codes are comprised of the sample media and the sample numbers. Client codes have client anonymity. ' ,
- {
Acceptance is based on the difference of the two results divided by the pooled st h two, where the pooled standard deviation is the square root of the sum of the squares of the TPUs.
t-e
(
-Q).
1 l-u V - 20 u
9 i Table A-5.
u' Environmental Measurements Laboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML),
comparison media *.
of EML and Tcledyne's Midwest Laboratory results for various sample Concentration in Bq/L" Lab Sample Date Code Type Collected Control Analysis Teledyne Result' EML Result d Limits' STW-788 Water Mar,1997 Am-241 0.8 i 0.2; 0.2 0.810.0 STW-788 Water 0.6 - 1.7 Mar,1997 Co-60 96.0 i 3.5;14.3 90.9 i 1.2 0.9 - 1.2 STW-783 Water Mar,1997 Cs-137 77.0 t 3.5; 11.6 69.8 1.2 STW 788 Water 0.9 - 1.3 Mar,1997 Fe-55 175.5 i 25.4;30.9 STW-788 235.0 20.0 0.3 - 1.5 Water Mar,1997 Gr. A1pha 1,042.6 i 36.8;132.4 1,130.0 i 10.0 STW-788 Water 0.5 - 1.3 Mar,1997 Gr. Beta 591.4 i 23.3;94.0 744.0 i 10.0 0.6 - 1.6 STW-788 Water Mar,1997 H-3 272.0 i 29.7;47.4 250.3 4. 2 0.7 - 1.9 STW-788 Water Mar,1997 Mn-54 23.713.4;4.1 20.910.3 STW-788 0.9 - 1.2 Water Mar,1997 Pu-238 1.4 i 0.2; 0.2 STW 788 1.310.1 0.7 - 1.3 Water Mar,1997 Pu-239 0.9i 0.1; 0.1 STW-788 0.9i0.1 0.8 - 1.4 Water Mar,1997 Sr-90 25.5 1.7; 3.1 STW-788 23.2 1.4 0.7 - 1.7 Water Mar,1997 U 1.510.2;0.3 1.1 i 0.1 0.4-1.4 STSO-790 Soil Mar,1997 Am-241 6.7 3.7; 3.8 5.7 i 0.5 0.5 - 2.7 STSO-790 Soil Mar,1997 Co-60 2.011.2;1.2 1.1 i 0.1 0.5-1.5 S The sample size was too small for an accurate measurement. The activity t error overlap the known v,alu
. J STSO-790 Soil Mar,1997 Cs-137 918.6 i 8.4;92.2 825.5 1 14.1 0.8 - 1.3 STSO-790 Soil Mar,1997 K-40 359.1 1 32.1;48.2 334.3 7.1 0.7 - 1.7 STSO-790 Soil Mar,1997 Pu-238 0.3 i 0.2; 0.2 0.5 i 0.1 0.4 - 1.9 STSO-790 Soil Mar,1997 Pu-239 132.4 i 5.2;14.2 134.9 17.1 0.7 - 1.9 STSO-790 Soil Mar,1997 Sr-90 38.8 i 5.8;7.0 40.3 0.4 0.5 - 2.8 !
STSO-790 Soil Mar,1997 U 79.3 i 3.8;8.8 81.314.8 0.3 - 1.4 STVE-791 Vegetation Mar,1997 Am-241 1.7 i 0.7; 0.7 1.2 1 0.1 0.7 - 2.8 STVE-791 Vegetation Mar,1997 Cm-244 0.7 i 0.5; 0.5 0.910.1 0.5 - 1.7 STVE-791 Vegetation Mar,1997 Co-60 16.9 3.6; 4.3 12.510.3 0.6 - 1.4 STVE-791 Vegetation Mar,1997 Cs-137 216.7 i 9.4;30.9 189.317.3 0.8 - 1.5 STVE-791 Vegetation Mar,1997 Pu-239 1.8 0.8; 0.8 1.9 i 0.2 0.7 - 2.0 STVE-791 Vegetation Mar,1997 Sr-90 361.1 i 19.7;41.1 361.0 43.3 0.5 - 1.3 STAP-792 Air Filter Mar,1997 Co-57 9.5 i 0.2; 1.0 10.8 i 1.0 0.6 - 1.2 STAP-792 Air Filter Mar,1997 Co-60 5.3 i 0.3; 0.6 5.010.3 0.7 - 1.2 STAP-792 Air Filter Mar,1997 Cs-134 10.810.3;1.1 10.9 1.0 0.7 - 1.2 STAP-792 Air Filter Mar,1997 Cs-137 9.l i 0.4; 1.0 8.7 0.8 0.7 - 1.3 STAP-792 Air Filter Mar,1997 Gr. Alpha 1.2 i 0.0; 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.8 - 1.6 STAP-792 Air Filter Mar,199T Gr. Beta 0.6 i 0.0; 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.7 - 1.8 STAP-792 Air Filter Mar,1997 Mn-54 8.510.4;1.0 7.6 i 0 6 STAP-792 0.8 - 1.3 Air Filter Mar,1997 Pu-238 0.010.0;0.0 0.1 i 0.0 0.6 - 1.5 The cause of the deviation for the transuranic analysis (Pu-238,239, U) is unknown. A dilution error is
_ suspected.The analysis is being repeated.
V - 21
] Table A-5.
Environmental Measurements Laboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML),
comparison media'. of EML and Teledyne's Midwest Laboratory results for various sample Concentration in Bq/L 6 Lab Sample Date
, Code Type Collected Analysis Control Teledyne Result
- EML Result d Limits' STAP-792 Air Filter Mar,1997 Pu-239 0.010.0;0.0 0.1 1 0.0 STAP-792 Air Filter Mar,1997 Sb-125 0.5 - 1.5 14.li 1.1; 1.8 12.3 1.0 STAP-792 Air Filter Mar,1997 Sr-90 0.6 - 1.4 1.3 i 0.3; 0.3 1.510.1 STAP-792 Air Filter Mar,1997 U 0.7 - 2.7 0.210.0;0.0 0.2 0.0 STW-805 Water 0.8 - 3.4 Sep,1997 Co-60 23.611.5;3.7 STW-805 23.3 1.2 0.9 - 1.2 Water Sep,1997 Cs-134 63.5 t 2.6; 9.5 STW-805 66.0 t 2.6 0.5 - 1.5 Wa ter Sep,1997 Cs-137 34.9 i 2.4;5.6 STW-805 34.3 i 1.7 0.9 - 1.3 Wa ter Sep,1997 Fe-55 101.7 1 33.5;35.0 STW-805 115.0 10.0 0.3 - 1.5 Water Sep,1997 Gr. Alpha 597.0 12.0; 73.8 STW-805 557.0 i 60.0 0.5 - 1.3 Water Sep,1997 Gr. Beta 985.0 13.0;152.2 STW-805 712.0 i 70.0 0.6 - 1.6 Water Sep,1997 H-3 227.6 i 1.8;31.0 115.0 i 6.0 0.7 - 1.9 The sample was acidic, causing a breakdown of resin in the tritium column. The sample was neu pH 7 and reanalyzed. Results of reanalysis: 116.2i3.6 Bq/L.
STW 805 Water Sep,1997 Mn-54 38.5 i 3.2;5.0 37.8i 1.9
~ , STW-805 Water 0.9 - 1.2 Sep,1997 St-90 3.5 i 0.7; 0.8
/ STVE-806 2.9 i 0.2 0.7 - 1.7 i Vegetation Sep,1997 Co-60 32.3 i 5.6;7.1 STVE-806 32.4 1.6 0.6 - 1.4 Vegetation Sep,1997 Cs-137 627.3 1 16.7;86.9 STVE-806 624.0 1 31.0 0.8 - 1.5 Vegetation Sep,1997 K-40 1,091.7 i 95.2;144.8 1,130.0 i 70.0 0.8 - 1.5 STVE-806 Vegetation Sep,1997 St-90 1,335.0 32.0;137.3 1,434.0 75.0 STSO-807 Soil 0.5 - 1.3 j Sep,1997 Cs-137 1,239.4 1 22.5;126.0 810.0 1 40.0 0.8 - 1.3 The sample size was not standard. The sample was reanalyzed using a differentResults geometry.
of reanalysis: Cs-137 - 813.119.0 Bq/kg; K 275.9i 34.6 Bq/kg. )
STSO-807 Soil Sep,1997 K-40 q 478.0 i 29.0;55.9 315.0 t 70,0 0.7 - 1.7 STSO-807 Soil Sep,1997 Pu-239 j 10.810.4;1.2 10.2 0.4 0.7 - 1.9 STSO-807 Soil Sep,1997 Sr-90 31.5 i 5.6;6.4 34.8 t l.0 STSO-807 Soil 0.5 - 2.8 Sep,1997 U 57.0i 1.1;5.8 72.9 i 0.9 STAP-808 0.3 - 1.4 Air Filter Sep,1997 Gr. Alpha 1.810.1;0.2 STAP-808 1.5 0.1 0.8 - 1.6 Air Filter Sep,1997 Gr. Beta 3.310.1;0.3 STAP-808 3.010.1 0.7 - 1.8 Air Filter Sep,1997 Pu-238 0.2 i 0.1; 3.1 STAP-808 0.210.0 0.6 - 1.5 Air Filter Sep,1997 U 0.110.1;0.1 STAP-809 0.1 0.0 0.8 - 3.4 Air Filter Sep,1997 Ce-144 16.311.7;2.3 STAP-809 19.lio.7 0.5 - 1.5 Air Filter Sep,1997 Co-57 10.6 i 0.3;1.1 12.610.4 0.6 - 1.2 STAP-809 Air Filter Sep,1997 Co-60 9.8 i 0.3; 1.0 10.7 10.9 0.7 - 1.2 STAP-809 Air Filter Sep,1997 Cs-134 24.7 i 0.5;2.5 28.210.7 0.7 - 1.2 STAP-809 Air Filter Sep,1997 Cs-137 7.2 0.4; 0.8 7.3 0.3 0.7 - 1.3 STAP-809 Air Filter Sep,1997 Mn-54 6.8 i 0.4; 0.8 6.710.3 0.8 - 1.3
_STAP-809 Air Filter Sep,1997 Sb-125 18.0 1.3; 2.2 16.110.8 0.6 - 1.4 V - 22
( Table A-5. - Environmental Measurements Laboratory Quality Assessment Progra comparison media *. of EML and Teledyne's Midwest Laboratory results for various sam Concentration in Bq/L" Lab Sample . Date Codi Type Collected Analysis Teledyne Result' Control -
STAP-809 ' ' EML Resultd - Limits *
' Air Filter ~ Sep,1997 Sr 90 2.8i 0.4; 0.5 - 2.8 t 0.1 0.7 - 2.7
- The Environmental Measurements Laboratory provides the following nuclear speci H .
ers,. Soil, Tissue, Vegetation and Water, Teledyne does not participate in the Tissue progum. j
- Results are reported in Bq/L. with the following exceptions: Air filter results are reported in Bq/ filter, Soil resultsinare reported reported uCi/ filter, g, or mLin Bq/kg, Vegetation results are reported in Bq/kg. The results
- Teledyne results are reported as the mean of three dete uncertainty, rminations standard deviation; total promulgated-d
The controllimits are reported by EML as the percentiles of historic data distributions (1982-1992). se rom ratio of R
. development of the control limits are presented in DOE report EML-564.The evaluation o
.7,q V.
u
. i f
f f
V - 23 l-i' l
..