ML20215J871
| ML20215J871 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 05/04/1987 |
| From: | Fekete M, Geaney G PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215J857 | List: |
| References | |
| EE-EQ-0057, EE-EQ-0057-RA, EE-EQ-57, EE-EQ-57-RA, TAC-63576, NUDOCS 8705080303 | |
| Download: ML20215J871 (31) | |
Text
_ _
O SCrylCC" Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PUILIC CERVICE COMPANY CF CHLCRADO j
EVALUATION OF TEST DATA FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF FIRE WATER FLOW RATE TO THE CIRCULATOR WATER TURBINE DURING EES COOLDOWN FOR SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING EE-EQ-0057 REV.A Prepared By:
f'#'
2 M. J. Feket6 Date Proto-Power Corporation Reviewed By:
b 3///[7 G. W. Geaney
(/
' Da~te Proto-Power Corporation Verified By:
- k. Due l r/V/87 Date Approved By:
)
6-p&7 NUCLEAR DESIGN MANAGER Date NR 00 sob 7
F FOAMIQ372 22 3083
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
'Public o
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO Ch Service ~
CHECK LIST OF DESIGN VERIFICATION sy Ny QUESTIONS FOR DESIGN REVIEW METHOD p
\\
YES NO N/A E E EQ- 057 ru.A 2
1.
Were the inputs correctly selected and incorporated into design?
@]
2.
Are assumptions necessary to perform the design activity adequately described and reasonable?
Where necessary, are the assumptions identified for subsequent re-verifications when the detailed design activities are completed?
b 3.
Are the appropriate quality and quality assurance requirements specified?
]j 4.
Are the applicable codes, standards and regulatory requirements including issue and addenda properly identified and are their requirements for design met?
5.
Have applicable construction and operating experience been considered?
6.
Have the design interface requirements been satisfied?
7.
Was an appropriate design method used?
b 8.
Is the output reasonable compared to inputs?
2 U
9.
Are the specified parts, equipment, and processes suitable for the required application?
]
]
10.
Are the specified materials compatible with each other and the design environmental conditions to which the material will be exposed?
2 11.
Have adequate maintenance features and requirements been specified?
]
12.
Are accessibility and other design provisions adequate for performance of needed maintenance and repair?
]
13.
Has adequate accessibility been provided to perform the in-service inspection expected to be requi. 2d during the plantlife?
b 14.
Has the design properly considered radiation exposure to the public and plant personnel?
Q]
15.
Are the acceptance criteria incorporated in the design documents sufficient to allow verification that design requirements have been satisfactorily accomplished?
Q]
16.
Have adequate pre-operational and subsequent periodic test requirements been appropriately specified?
17.
Are adequate handling, storage, cleaning and shipping requirements specified?
Ub 18.
Are adequate identification requirements specified?
U 19.
Are requirerr.ents for record preparation review, approval, retention, etc., adequately specified?
NOTE:
If the answer to any question is no, provide additionalinformation and resolution below.
RESOLUTION OF DESIGN DEFICIENCIES UNCOVERED DURING THE DESIGN VERIFICATION PROCESS nel W ke d SI TQ
%4dae.L _ h e
e
- .. (7
, g.,, J.-.H M e-0 k,
AA A.
tA p/n~eeoraey y
g
/-L.
ffwa d
f
/ 2 '),
b
./. # C 4,,
~
if~.<
lp vaos d o' s e-o s u O 4
Ded /)w w:JL
%,m y
n k
.5 *
- 5 s %
Na $
ceJ )
aoh o
ver*
- O,
AL a. C, ;
C
.,0 asc:9 IL m:.a K
L, J sh/e-r Form tM 344 226
i 1
EVALUATION OF TEST DATA FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF FIRE WATER FLOW RATE TO THE CIRCULATOR WATER TURBINE DURING EES COOLDOWN FOR SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING EE-EQ 0057 REV.A Prepared By:
Proto Power Corporation 591 Poquonnock Road Groton, Connecticut 06340 May 1,1987
EE-EQ 0057 REV.A TAHLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 PURPOSE 1
2.0
SUMMARY
1 3.0 SCOPE 1
4.0 APPROACH 1
5.0 EVALUATION 2
5.1 Background
2 5.2 Test Description 3
5.3 Comparison of Measured Flow Rate to 3
Available Flow Rate
6.0 CONCLUSION
S 3
7.0 REFERENCES
3 8.0 A'ITACHMENTS 4
8.1 Proto-Power Calculation No. 82-32, Rev.,
" Determination of Circulator Water Turbine Flow Rate for Safe Shutdown Cooling" 8.2 Proto-Power Calculation No. 82-18, Rev.,
"Effect of Varying Pelton Wheel Flow Rate on EES Secondary Cooling Flow Rate for PSC - Fort St. Vrain EQ Program" 8.3
" Simulated" Fire Water Flow Path to Circu-lator WaterTurbine i
l l
l
,._______- ~
v.
EE-EQ 0057 REV.A 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this engineering evaluation (EE) was to evaluate the test data for the fire water flow rate to a circulator water turbine (Pelton wheel) for EQ Safe Shutdown Cooling to provide confirmation of the calculational model used in GA Technologies (GA) analysis "EES Cooldown for EQ and Appendix R Events with Vent Lines (1.5 H)"(Reference 7.1). The results of a recent water turbine flow measurement test (Reference 7.2) will serve as the basis for this evaluation.
This EE will be used to support PSC responses to Questions 6 and 7 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's letter G-87060 (Reference 7.3).
2.0
SUMMARY
Circulator speed was used as an indication of water turbine torque output. At the circulator speed corresponding to the water turbine torque output required to provide the maximum helium flow rate needed for Safe Shutdown Cooling (SSC), the water flow rate of approximately 137 gpm to the water turbine, as measured using an ultrasonic flow meter, was in close agreement with the anticipated flow rate of 143 gpm for the torque input required for SSC and was also less than the conservative flow rate of 160 gpm available to the water turbine corresponding to the Reference 7.1 analysis.
3.0 SCOPE The procedure for SSC, as developed in EE-EQ-0023 (Reference 7.4) relies on concurrent fire water flow to the EES section of one steam generator for secondary heat removal, and to the water turbine of one circulator to drive the circulator for primary coolant circulation through that steam generator. GA analysis, Reference 7.1, demonstrated SSC, determining the required total j
primary coolant flow rates during SSC. A flow test (Reference 7.2) was conducted to determine the maximum water turbine flow rate required for SSC. The results of this test are evaluated in Attachment 8.1.
The scope of this document was to demonstrate that the flow rate to the water turbine used in the GA analysis (Reference 7.1) for SSC is conservative, based l
on the flow test results.
4.0 APPROACH The results of the flow test (Reference 7.2) were evaluatcd in Attachment 8.1 to determine the required flow rate to the water turbine to attain the torque output necessary to meet SSC circulator speed requirements. This flow rate was compared to: 1) the anticipated flow rate which would be required to drive the water turbine for SSC based on previously performed circulator perforrnance tests conducted by GA, (determined by separate calculation in.1), and 2) the available water turbine flow rate corresponding to the steam generator flow rate used in the GA analysis (Reference 7.1) 1-
EE EQ 0057 L
REV.A i
demonstrating SSC. [Although the Reference 7.1 analysis does not explicitly utilize a flow rate to the water turbine, Attachment 8.2 has determined the i
available water turbine flow rate associated with the flow rate to the steam
-)
generator used in the Reference 7.1 analysis.)
1
' 5.0 EVALUATION 5.1 Hackground The SSC flow path utilizes one fire water pump to provide fire water to the emergency condensate header and then concurrently to the EES section of one steam generator, and to an emergency water booster pump. The booster pump provides boosted fire water to a circulator water turbine to provide pnmary coolant circulation. The booster pump (and thus water turbine) flow rate represents a significant component of the total fire l
water flow rate and t2erefore, can impact the cooling water flow rate to the steam generator. This relationship has-been evaluated in.2, which showed that during SSC, fire water flow rate to the steam generator is not significantly sensitive to booster pump flow I
rate.
The adequacy of SSC using fire water has been demonstrated by GA analysis (Reference 7.1). This analysis was based on a hydraulic analysis -
l (Attachment A of Reference 7.1) which concluded that a steam generator cooling water flow rate of 948 GPM would be provided with an assumed i
water turbine flow rate of125 GPM. The initial helium flow rate used in.
i i
~ the Reference 7.1' analysis was 15 lb/sec (1.5% design flow rate),
l increasing to approximately 37 lb/sec (3.8% design flow rate) six hours
-l after interruption of forced circulation. As stated in PSC Response 7 in Attachment I to PSC Letter P-87055_(Reference 7.5),37 lb/sec primary coolant flow rate would be obtained with'a differential pressure at the helium circulator pelton wheel nozzle of 175 psid, and a flow rate of approximately 140 gpm to the water turbine. Circulator and water turbine performance used in the Reference 7.1 analysis were based on the original circulator performance test results conducted by GA. Further discussions on this topic are contained in GA Document No. 907274 (Reference 7.6).
The Reference 7.1 analysis conservatively used a constant 940 GPM steam generator flow, in part to account for anticipated higher water turbine flow rates. Attachment 8.2 concNded that the 940 gpm flow to the steam generator corresponds to u tipproximate available water turbine flow rate of160 gpm.
Prior to the Reference 7.2 test,5.cAtg a the water turbine with either fire water or simulated fire water to measure water flow rate at SSC conditions had not been conducted. However, as required by FSV surveillance test program (specifically Reference 7.7), each circulator is periodically tested with throttled condensate supplied by the booster pump te verify that the circulator speed required to arovide the maximum helium flow rate required for SSC is achieved. The 1eference 7.2 test was therefore conducted to measure the required water flow rate to the water turbine for SSC.
2-
EE-EQ 0057 REY.A 5.2 Test Description Condensate was used to simulate fire water flow to the booster pump and the water turbine of 1A circulator. Condensate was throttled to attain a pressure of115 psig in the emergency condensate header to simulate fire water conditions at this location durmg SSC. The water flow path from the operating condensate pump to the 1A circulator water turbine is shown on Attachment 8.3. A clamp-on ultrasonic flow meter (Polysonics, Inc., Model DHT-P) was used to measure the water flow rate in the emergency feedwater line directly upstream of the circulator 1A water turbine. Circulator speed was used as an indication of water turbine torque output. The water flow rate to the water turbine was measured at the circulator speed corresponding to the water turbine torque output required to provide the maximum helium flow rate needed for SSC.
5.3 Comparison of Measured Flow Rate to Available Flow Rate The test data for the Reference 7.2 test has been evaluated in Attachment 8.1. The measured water flow rate to the water turbine was 137 gpm.
Considering the manufacturer's stated flow rate accuracy of +12%, -0, the actual flow rate during the test was within 137 to 153 gpm. The maximum flow rate of 153 gpm in this range is less than the available flow rate of 160 gpm corresponding to the GA analysis demonstrating '
SSC (Reference 7.1).
The anticipated flow rate of 143 gpm, determined in Attachment 8.1, is within the range of the actual flow rate during the test, considering the accuracy of the test instrumentation.
6.0 CONCLUSION
The measured water turbine flow rate for Safe Shutdown Cooling (137 gpm) was conservatively less than the available flow rate associated with the GA analysis demonstrating Safe Shutdown Cooling (160 gpm).
7.0 REFERENCES
7.1 GA Technologies Document No. 909269, Issue A,"EES Cooldown for EQ and Appendir R Events with Vent Lines (1.5 H Delay)." (Refer to P-87055) 7.2 Test Procedure T-346.
7.3 NRC letter Heitner to Williams, dated March 3,1987 (G-87060).
7.4 Engineering Evaluation EE-EQ-0023, Rev. B, " Engineering Evaluation of the Procedure to Recover from an Actuation of the Steam Line Rupture Detection / Isolation System for Power Levels through P2."
7.5 PSC Letter Brey to Berkow, dated February 17,1987 (P-87055). -
EE EQ-0057 REV.A 7.6 GA Technologies Document No. 907274, Issue A, " Fort St. Vrain Circulator, Pe' ton Wheel Driven Circulator Performance."
7.7 Surveillance Test Procedure SR 5.2.7a2-A/5.3.4a2 A, Issue 1, " Loop I/ Loop B Valves and Circulator Drive Tests (Condensate)."
8.0 - ATTACHMENTS 8.1 Proto-Power Calculation No. 82-32, Rev., " Determination of Water Turbine Flow Rate During Performance of Test T-346."
8.2 Proto-Power Calculation No. 82-18, Rev., "Effect of Varying Pelton Wheel Flow Rate on EES Secondary Cooling Flow Rate for PSC - Fort St.
Vrain EQ Program."
8.3 " Simulated" Fire Water Flow Path to Circulator Water Turbine.
EE-EO-CC57
.REV. A ATTACHMENT 8.1 CALCULATI0ft C0VER SHEET PROTO-P0ilER CORPORATI0il TITLE:
DETERMINATION OF-CIRCULATOR WATER TURBINE FLOW RATE FOR SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING CALCULATION NO.:
82-32 4
FILE NO.: 7511482 M.J. Fekete WJ/
4-30-87 DATE CALCULATED BY P.H.
Collette 4-30-87 CHECKED BY DATE
- ^ ; s; "E"
1 y
6 82-32 PROTO POWER CORPORATION 3a scoa oc3 GROTON, CONNECTICUT MJ.Pekete 04-30-87 P.H.Collettf*';7511482 CLIENT PFOJECT per SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING SUBJECT WATER TURBINE FLOW RATE FOR SSC TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PURPOSE 2
BACKGROUND 2
CALCULATION 3
CONCLUSION 5
REFERENCES 6
ATTACHMENTS A.
" Simulated" Fire Water Flow Path to Circulator Water Turbine.
B.
Average of Data Recorded During Performance of Test T-346.
C.
Required Circulator Speed for SSC.
D.
Calibration Sheet for Polysonics flow meter Serial No.
10147, dated April 13, 1987.
E.
Calibration Sheet for Polysonics flow meter Serial No.
10147, dated September 10, 1986.
As 82-32 2
6
~
PROTO POWER CORPORATION 3 3 wes cci GROTON, CONNECTICUT M.J.Fekete 04-30-87
"' *^9. H. Colle tte
"'7511482 CL ENT PROJECT PSC SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING ScEJECT WATER TURBINE FLOW RATE FOR SSC l
l PURPOSE:
The purpose of this test calculation is to evaluate the data obtained during the performance of Test T-346 (Reference A). This test was conducted to determine the water flow rate to a circu-lator water turbine (pelton wheel) required to obtain the maximum helium flow needed during Safe Shutdown Cooling (SSC).
BACKGROUND GA analysis (Reference B) demonstrated that SSC would require 3.8% maximum helium flow rate.
SSC relies on concurrent fire, water flow to one steam generator EES section and to one circu-lator water turbine drive via one emergency water booster pump to provide primary coolant flow.
As stated in Reference C, GAT analysis concluded that this helium flow rate would be provided by a nozzle dif ferential pressure of 175 psi and a flow rate of approximately 140 gpm to the water l
turbine.
GA Document No. 907274 (Reference D) demonstrates the relation-ship between circulator speed, nozzle pressure, water flow rate and helium density for various water turbine torque values.
This document is based on manuf acturer's test data and appropriate scaling laws.
Reference D has been used as the basis of surveil-lance test Reference E,
which verifies that the water turbine torque necessary to provide the required 3.8% helium flow during SSC is achievable.
This test does not, however, measure water flow rate.
Therefore, the Reference A test was conducted to measure the water flow rate necessary to provide the water turbine torque necessary to provide the helium flow rate required for SSC.
The flow path used for this test is shown on Attachment A.
Water flow to the water turbine was measured using a clamp-on ultrasonic flow meter (manufactured by Polysonic, Inc., model DHT-P).
caz v~
82-32 3 c: 6 PROTO POWER CORPORATION oa.c, m
c,y GROTON, CONNECTICUT M.J.Fekete 04-30-87
"'*'5.H.Collette 7311482 CUENT PROJECT PSC SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING SUBJECT WATER TURBINE FLOW RATE FOR SSC CALCULATION Note:
The average of the data recorded for each parameter measured will be used throughout this calculation.
These are shown on Attachment B.
Readings from the data logger for helium temperature, the frequency counter for circulator speed and XI-93508 for helium pressure provide the highest accuracy available for monitoring these parameters, and will therefore, be used in this calculation.
A.
Helium density Helium density is calculated by the method in steps 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 of Reference E.
Pn i
f
=
.373
- Tin = T + 460*
Tin where f
=
helium density, lb/ft3 reactor pressure, psia Pin
=
helium temperature,
- R Tin
=
helium temperature,
- F T
=
Thus:
Tin =
132 + 460 = 592*F
.373 96.7 = 0.609 lb/ft3 f=
592 B.
Circulator Speed and Water Turbine Flow Rate Required for SSC Both Figure 2 of Reference E and Page B3 of Reference D (curve for A PN 175 psid (nozzle differential pressure)
=
present a plot of circulator speed vs. helium density for providing the water turbine torque required for SSC.
At the calculated density of.0609 lb/ft 3 from either curve, the required speed is approximately 1625 RPM (see Attachment D).
catc ~
82-32 4
cc 6 PROTO POWER CORPORATION on.c, won ci t GROTON, CONNECTICUT M.J.Fekete 04-30-87
"'*'b.H.Collette
- '51148.2 7
C U E *,I PROJECT PSC SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING sus.ECT WATER TURBINE PLOW RATE FOR SSC The referenced graphs were developed from equation 6 of Reference D (shown below).
Solving this equation indicates the required speed to be as follows:
"N 91.7 0\\.85 N 1.85
-3.7 X 10-4 N PN +.2078 PN = 20
+ 100 L4 foj i
where N = actual circulator speed RPM dPN
= nozzle supply dif f erential pressure, psid.
As the water turbine cavity pressure is atmospheric',
4PN = nozzle inlet gauge pressure.
No = reference speed, 10,550 RPM fo=referencedensity,.00675 lbm/ft3 and APN= 175 psid for SSC, per PSC Response 7 of Reference C.
-4
(
N l7 f.0609\\.85 N%1.85
-3.7 X 10 N /175 +.2078 (175) = 20
+ 100 /
(.00675l
- 10550, 1055 Thus N=
1617 RPM Per equation 8 of Reference D, the corresponding water flow rate would be:
0 = 10.7981 where:
0 = water turbine flow rate, gpm 0=
10.7981 M 143 gpm
=
cas so 82-32 "i' -
3i 5s PROTO POWER CORPORATION 6
x, v.rea 73 M.J.Fekete 04-30-87 GROTON, CONNECTICUT "E " ^ E D P.H.Collette d*'7511482 C mi o CT PSC SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING S.5 JECT WATER TURBINE FLOW RATE FOR SSC C. Calculated Flow Rate from Test Data The Polysonic flow meter average indicated water velocity was 5.94 fps.
This value must be converted to flow rate using the following equation (printed on the device):
VX (ID)2 X 2.45 0
=
where:
0
= water flow rate, gpm V
= water velocity, fps ID
= pipe inside diameter, in.
The flow was measured in line 3"L21430-D16.
From specifica-tion 1-M-2, the pipe is schedule 40; thus the ID is 3.068 inches.
Thus:
(5.94 fps) (3.068)2 (2.45) 0
=
137 gpm
=
Post-test as-found and pre-test calibration results of the Polysonics flow meter used in the test are found in Attach-ments D and E,
respectively. The manufacturer of the Polysonics flow meter has verbally stated that the expected accuracy of the flow meter indicated flow rate for the downward flowing pipe which the flow measurement was taken on is approximately +12%, -0%.
Thus the actual flow rate was between approximately 137 gpm and (137) X (1.12) = 153 gpm.
CONCLUSION The circulator water turbine flow rate measured by the Polysonics flow meter during Test T-346 was conservatively less than available water turbine flow rate assumed in the GA analysis (Reference B) demonstrating Safe Shutdown Cooling.
cnc" PROTO POWER CORPORATION 82-32 6 :: 6 m,w c..
GROTON, CONNECTICUT m
M.J.Fekete 04-30-87
" 9.H.Collette
"7311482 CLIENT PSC PROJECT SUBJECT SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING WATER TURBINE FLOW RATE FOR SSC A summary of the results of this evaluation is as follows:
FLOW RATE, gpm Predicted flow rate based on previous 143 performance test Available flow rate from Ref. B analysis 160 Measured flow rate range from T-346 137 to 153 Test considering instrumentation accuracy REFERENCES A.
Test Procedure T-346 B.
GA Document 909269, Issue A, "EES Cooldown for EQ" and
" Appendix R Events With Vent Lines (1.5H Delay)"
C.
PSC Letter Brey to Berkow, dated February 17, 1987 (P-87055)
D.
GA Document No.
- 907274, Issue A,
" Fort St.
Vrain Circulator, Pelton Wheel Driven Circulator Perform-ance."
E.
Surveillance Test Procedure SR 5.2.7a2-A/5.3.4a2-A, Issue 1, " Loop I/ Loop II Valves and Circulator Drive Tests (Condensate)"
"SIMULATEEf E lRE WATER FLOW PATH 70 CIRCULATOR WATER TUReihE_
i b
2 m
COMDEMSATE DEMINERAUZER i
PUMP V-31(o6 EMERGEht.Y j
CONDEMSArE
- HEAOER, i
X/
I V-31239 P\\-
312 O 4 d
POLYSOMIC, FLONMETER S'bzO Qei_
3-2153ro-i
)
- y g n
(=
N X
- N.E, 4
W21257 HV-2109-1 SV-2tO9 g
f ClRCULAIOR "d>
EMERGENCY WATER 3L-21430 ~D/6 yg e,005iER PUMP P-21iO
CALC. 82-32
~
ATTACHMENT B Page 1'of 1 AVERAGE OF DATA RECORDED DURING WATER TURBINE PLOW TEST Water Temp.
He Pressure He Temp.
Speed V
(*F)
(psia)
(*F)
(RPM)
(fps) 71 96.7 132 1632 5.94 V = water velocity measured by the Polysonic flow meter j
Parameter Instruments Used Water Temp TE-3154 and Data Logger He Pressure XI-93508 He Temp.
TE-1174 and Data Logger Speed SM-2105 and frequency counter V
Polysonic flow meter l
CALC. E2-32 ATTACH. MENT C i
Page 1 of 1 6
l O
e C
1 I
I 4
D= C E >=
l SC Ww en D-m J
& D JZ I
N MW gw l
c N
m 4
es 5
e
- C 9#i-C=
v x
C.
as
='
?
?
-]
i-r f-2 1.
r
~
s a
=
g 1
f f
E A
E o
f A
I A
L E
E I
I I
F.
J g
6 I
]
1 3
5
,jf f
/
t i F
' 'I*
~
r mg
'E f
y 7
gel =- _: =
- =
__ l a
-=
x g
N m
N 2
b~
=
=
m U
U
'C "4lll x
=
sM 6M g
C,,
b
}
C aC 4
C h
h E
N 8
=
e
~
~
e f
T g
N f'1 C
U R
~
E 8
A E
=
g 5
E Z b
X E
b 3
g g
4 A
A A
4 4
~
E ac E
W U
E M
E I
e I
E am I
g I
i i
I O
=
I c
e e
c c
C 8
C C
C l
=
4 m
N
==
(HEH) c33ds 10.Ymou13 N
---,--_.-,------,_,-,-,,,,-,~,,-,---m-.-.
mn,,
CALC. 82-32 ATTACHMENT D
.A Pace 1 of 1 CERTIFICAT10h'0F hBS TRACEAELE m
FLOW Call 5 RAT 10N Poly 5cnics, In:.. certifies that Felystnics ficW7eter, M:5e1 l)//r-P Serial No. _Jo]y7. was ficw tested in comparison to Polysenics staatard water meter with N95 traceable calibretion.
NSS TRACEABLE METER:
CARLOP. 1 1%:H POSITIVE DISPLACEFENT WATER METER SER. NO. 1228170 CALIBRATED:
//. 79. B/o_
CAL. DUE DATE: //.J t/-# 7 FULL 5; LE:
10 FPS 5TA%AQ
[
TEST Lh!T j
SET FLOW TO:
READIN3 DIFTEREN:E ERR F. 't FS i
2 cc5 2oA
.OA
- 0. 8 4 FPS
//,f8
./A
/. 8 6 SP5 I
4.46 I
. 74 J. 6 e vp5 8 31
.21 l
3.1
__ 0 FFS
/gg l
,y2f J.[
1 rps, FEET :ta SEtos;-
p-kc. n ?/[1: h/C Ch:
hert Ur.$ koo$:n f bMit CA'.lBRATION PRXEDURE:
P0iYS0!.1CS h;. 20cED
< n u
cd ar-ac CAtle(ATies T0.Eus:E:
.ffI. FULL 5: ALE
" Q ' j,., $ p M g ) 'p d y'g, Cus:OsER aEr. v aE;:
/myr wen neceray n:
o u ;,1 m / o e A CA. oct: <-a-n
'Rsode G /.
C:'.. t.E tA;E: %/ f -ha I:tt:
I Tce 62 ?
';?.*
- " '.1
i _'.' ; :.OW ME A?'vc E.'.' E N T
i
'* ]
CALC. 82-32 ATTACHMENT E Page 1 of 1 I
CFRTIFICATION OF NBS TPACEASLE lm FLOW CALIBRATIO_N 1
Polysenics, Inc., certifies that Polysonics flowmeter, Hodel 3// S k. Serial No. /0/ Y 7, was f i c'v tested in co=parison to Polysonics standard water meter with NBS traceable calibration.
NBS TRACEABLE HETER: CARLON 1 INCH FOSITIVE DISPLACEMENT WATER METER SER. NC. 1228170 CALIBRATED:. f e # 9 - 8 /3 CAL. DUE DATE: //229-8h TULL SCALE:
10 FPS STANDARD TEST UNIT ERROR SET FLod To:
READING DIFrERENCE (E FS)
' 2. 0 0
0%
2 rPs 3.96
_. o V
, +'$
t reS
./o
/$
' Sto s Fr$
7/37
./3
/. 3 %
s res 10 TPS FPS =
FEET PEF. SECOND CALIERATION P R O C E D '.' R E :
POLYSos1CS NO. 20450 CALIBRATION TOLERANCE :-
FULL SCALE CUSTCMER REF. NO.:
_/7b l
BY: D I/_
CAL. DATE: f*/O "
TITLE:
Ma,
d CAL.' DUE DATE: _ f*/O _"8_7 '
.[
~
Form 6243 A SOUND V.AY TO MEASUPE FLOW
~
1
~
EE-EQ-0057.
REV. A
. ATTACHMENT 8.2 CALCULATION C0VER SHEET
)
PROTO-P0llER CORPORATION l
l TITLE:
EFFECT OF VARYING PELTON WHEEL FLOW RATE ON EES SECONDARY COOLING FLOW RATE FOR PSC - FORT ST. VRAIN EQ PROGRAM CALCULATION NO.:
82-18, Rev. -
FILE NO.: ~ 7511497 Aa7D 75W9ft r
CALCULATED BY M.J.
Fekete DATE f
7 CHECKED BY P.M.
Breglio DATE M/f/#7
u..~.. g,y as.,
PROTO POWER CORPORATION MT N/d
. 2//9// ?
m GROTON, CONNECTICUT ai..:. p-e
- ' pr//n ?
C 'EM -
g P A 3.n T
~
- 6) Of f/hu)
Ur E E 3 r x 4 n p /o u;
/
INDEX l
1.
PURPOSE 2.
BACKGROUND 3.
METHOD 4.
RESULTS 5.
REFERENCES l
ATTACHMENTS:
A.
Computer Input Files and Printout - 150 GPM Pelton Wheel Flow B.
Computer Input Files and Printout - 160 GPM Pelton Wheel Flow C.
Computer Input Files and Printout - 175 GPM Pelton l
Wheel Flow l
I
u... y g at.
n g
PROTO POWER CORPORATION m r.c - a
/9 82 GROTON, CONNECTICUT
' #M ai. :,.c a..
p gy cvE.-
g-(
pgy g
m ec, 7e/M &l/eG/ FA J VJ SS bob's ReW
/
1.0 PURPOSE To determine the effect that varying the flow to the circulator pelton wheel would have on the fire water flow rate to the EES section of one steam generator during Safe Shutdown Cooling following a high energy line break (HELB).
2.0 BACKGROUND
For EQ Safe Shutdown Cooling, fire water is directed from one fire water pump to the emergency condensate header, and then concurrently to the circulator pelton wheel (to drivd the circulator) and to the EES section of one steam genera-tor (for secondary heat removal).
The pelton wheel flow rate affects total fire water pump flow rate and the cooling water flow rate to the steam generator.
Proto-Power hydraulic analysis of the main steam vent flow path to be used for EQ Safe Shutdown Cooling, Ref.
5.1, concluded that 948 GPM of fire water would be provided to the steam generator, assuming 125 GPM flow to the pelton wheel, and 76 psia /255*F at the steam generator outlet.
The EES outlet temperature is controlled by varying fire water flow to the pelton wheel to affect circulator speed and thus primary coolant flow.
GAT analysis, Ref.
5.2, concluded that primary coolant flow rate must increase during the cooldown to provide adequate secondary heat removal.
This would required pelton wheel flow rates greater than 125 gpm.
This analysis will determine the effect that increased pelton wheel flow would have on fire water flow to the steam generator.
3.0 METHO_D_
The computer programs, approach and flow path used in Ref.
5.1 will be utilized to determine the flow rate to the steam generator for several selected flow rates to the pelton wheel.
As with the Reference 5.1 analysis, the EES outlet conditions will be controlled to 76 psia and 255'F.
i l
[2--g
'i' --
- '.. a. :
' 'i 3 e 3 PROTO POWER CORPORATION
<.s-a GROTON, CONNECTICUT
- I8
'#I9/M ai, tai:
p ae.. ppj y
CUENT pgg PROJECT g g _gg SJ6 JECT p,g A Qlpl j/du)
//
$.I bcIhn S/O d
/
4.0 RESULTS Pelton Wheel Flow Rate Steam Generator Flow Rate Source (GPM)
(GPM) of Data 125 948 Ref. 5.1 150 942 Att. A 160 940 Att. B 175 936 Att. C The above data demonstrates that the flow rate to the steam generator is not significantly sensitive to pelton wheel flow.
5.0 REFERENCES
5.1 Proto-Power Calculation No. 82-03, Rev. C, "EES Safe Shutdown Cooling for PSC Fort St. Vrain (3. Main Steam Vent Flow Path)"
5.2 GAT Document No. 909269, Issue A, "EES Cooldown for EQ and Appendix R Events with Vent Lines (1.5 H Delay)"
CALC. 8 2-18, REV. -
ATTACBMENT A PAGE 1 OF 2
- FILE: FWTOMSVL.DAT ***
SECTION ID
-WDIV-K(FIX)- K(VAR)-
EPS EL
-FL.-
TF
- MIN
- MAY 34 1 :
1
-4
,10.020, 0.1, 5.88, 522.1,1.500D-4, 2.1, 1,
80.0, NA ',
NA 2
4 -6 6.065, 0.1, 3.37, 292.7,1.500D-4, 25.9, 1,
80.0, NA NA-3 6-7
, 7.981, 0.1,
.91, 61.4,1.500D-4, 0.2, 1,
80.0, NA NA 4 :
7-8 7.870, 1,
4.9, 30.1,1.500D-4, 0.3, 1,
80.0, NA,
NA 5:
8-9 9.516, 1,
37.8, 59.7,1.500D-4, 4.3, 1,
80.0, NA NA 6 :
9-10 9.172, 1,
.98, 136.3,1.500D-4,
-60.6, 1,
80.0, NA NA 7: 10 - 11 9.172,1.81,
.42, 94.2,1.500D-4,
-0.3, 1,
80.0, NA NA O: 11 12 3.152, 6,
10.4, 102.1,1.500D-4, 9.0, 1,
80.0, NA NA 9: 12 - 18 3.150, 6,
.62, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 1,
80.0, NA NA les 18 - 19 3.346, 6,
.59, 26.2,1.500D-4,
-4.6, 1,
80.0, NA.,
NA 11: 19 - 20 0.886, 108, 104.30, 495.3,8.202D-5, 27.0, 1,
80.0, NA NA 12: 20 - 21 0.874, 100,
.01, 12.2,8.202D-5, 0.9, 1,
80.0, NA NA 13: 21 - 22 0.898, 324,
.72, 0.0,8.202D-5, 0.0, 1,
80.0, NA,
NA 14: 22 - 23 0.724, 324, 209.50, 26.0,8.202D-5, 2.2, 1,
80.0, NA NA 15: 23 - 23A, 0.724, 324, 0.00, 2467.3,0.202D-5, 4.8, 1,
81.4, NA NA 16: 23A-23B, 0.724, 324, 0.00, 0.0,8.202D-5, 0.0, 1,
81.4, NA NA 17: 23B-24 0.724, 324, 0.00, 0.0,8.200D-5, 0.0, 1,
82.7, NA NA 18: 24 - 24A, 0.550, 324, 0.11, 1818.0,8.202D-6, 2.7, 1,
95.6, NA NA 19: 24A-25 0.550, 324, 0.00, 0.0,0.202D-6, 0.0, 1,
95.6, NA NA 20: 25 - 26 0.590, 324,
.77, 166.0,8.202D-6, 4.6, 1,
109.4, NA NA 21:'26 - 26A, 0.590, 324, 0.00, 1540.1,8.202D-6,
-3.3, 1,
181.7, NA NA 22: 26A-27 0.590, 324,,
0.00, 0.0,8.202D-6, 0.0, 1,
181.7, NA NA 20: 27 - 28 0.590, 324, 1.34, 270.1,8.202D-6,
-11.0, 1,
255.0, NA NA
~4: 28 - 29 0.768, 109, 0.12, 15.3,8.202D-6,
-0.9, 1, 255.0, NA NA 25: 29 - 30 0.969, 108, 1.48, 525.6,8.202D-6,
-27.0, 1,
255.0, NA NA 26: 30 - 31 3.803, 6,
.66, 23.0,1.500D-4, 4.6, 1,
255.0, NA NA 27: 31 -200 5.826, 6,
1.5, 182.2,1.500D-4, 49.0, 1,
255.0, NA NA 28: 200-201 4.411, 1,
.60, 4.3,1.500D-4, 0.0, 1, 255.0, NA NA 29:
HV-A 4.411, 1,
0.0, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 6,
255.0,1130.0, 1.0 30: 201-202 4.411, 1,
.11, 14.2,1.500D-4, 1.3, 1,
255.0, NA NA 31:
HV-B 4.411, 1,
0.0, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 6,
255.0, 164.0, 1.0 32: 200-203 4.411, 1,
.11, 17.4,1.500D-4, 1.3, 1,
255.0, NA NA 33: 203-204 4.411, 1,
1.0, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 1, 255.0, NA NA 34: 204-204A, 4.411, 2,
1.0, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 1,
255.0, NA NA
CALC. 82-18, REV. -
ATTACRMENT A PAGE 2 OF 2
~ LOW = 942 GFM AT 80 sF?-
'USE PUMF CURVE CO; ENTER PRESSURE] (Y/N):Y7 TYPE OF PUMF (ENTER NO. FROM 1 TO 5): 1 ?
PUMP (S) ARRANGEMENT (ONE=0 - PARALLEL =1
- SERIES =2): 0?
ADDITIONAL FLOW (USE WDIV=0.1 IN INFUT FILE!)= 150 GFM?
. FLOW 6 FUMP =1092.00 GPM AT
- 80. 0.h F 10~. 98 FT/ STAGE
. PUMP HEAD
=
TWO-PHASE SECTIONS
- DIVIDER = 10 FILE:FWTOMSVL.DAT - NO. OF SECTIONS = 34 SECTION ID L
FLOW P(IN)
P(OUT) 1 :
1
-4 10.020 14.0 543,044 145.2 142.5 23 4 -6 6.065 8.0 543,044 142.5 120.4 3
6-7 7.981 1.9 543,044 120.4 122.7 4 :
7-8 7.870 5.4 468,450 122.7 121.2 5
8~- 9 9.516 08.7 468,450 121.2 114.7 6:
9-ic 9.172 0.1 468,450 114.7 140.3
-7 10 - 11 9.172 2.0 258,812 140.3 140.0 12 0.152 12.4 78,075 140.3 130.0 8: 11 9: 12 - 18 0.150 0.6 78,075 133.0 102.8 10: 18 - 19 3.046 1.1 78,075 132.8 104.6 11: 19 - 20 0.886 116.9 4,037 134.6 106.8 12: 20 - 21 0.874 0.3 4,337 106.8 106.4 I
oo PRESS
<CR)
TO CONTINUE **
SECTION ID K
FLOW P(IN)
P(OUT) 103 21 - 22 0.898 0.7 1,446 106.4 106.4 14: 22 - 20 0.724 210.3 1,446 106.4 98.2 10 20 - 23A 0.724 7.4. 8 1,446 98.2 93.6 16: 20A-20B 0.724 0.0 1,446 93.6 93.6 17: 0;b-24 0.724 0.0 1,446 93.6 93.6 18: 24 - 24A 0.550 46.2 1,446 90.6 87.7 19: 24A-25 0.550 0.0 1,446 87.7 87.7 20: 25 - 26 8.590 4.9 1,446 87.7 85.3 21: 26 - 26A 8.590 30.7 1,446 85.3 84.0 22: 26A-27 8.590 0.0 1,446 84.0 84.0 20: 27 - 28 S.590 6.8 1,446 84.0 87.9
~24 28 - 29 0.768 0.4 4,337 87.9 88.2 25: 29 - 30 0.969 10.8 4,037 88.0 98.1 26: 00 - 31 0.800 1.1 78,075 98.1 96.1 27: 31 -200 5.826 4.5 78,075 96.1 76.0 28: 200-201 4.411 0.7 468,450 76.0 74.0 29:
HV-A 4.411 0.0 468,450 74.2 73.4 Wcr=3,627,254 00: 201-202 4.411 0.3 468,450 73.4 70.0 01:
HV-D 4.411 0.0 468,450 72.0 07.2 Wer=
513,058 32: 202-203 4.411 0.4 468,450 07.2 35.6 00: 203-204 4.411 1.0 468,450 05.6 02.9 34: 204-204A 4.411 1.0 204,225 02.9 12.5 X IN= 0.00 OUT=
4.03 00 FRESS CR:
TO CONTINUE **
SECTION ID K
FLOW P(IN)
P(OUT) oo F6 ESSURE AT ECD OF SYSTEM =
12.5 PSIA
CALC. 8 2-18, REV. -
ATTACBMENT B PAGE 1 OF 2
- FILE: FWTOMSVL.DAT ***
SECTION ID
-WDIV-K(FIX)- K(VAR)-
EPS EL
-FL.-
TF
- MIN
- MAY 04 1
1
-4
,10.020, 0.1, 5.88, 522.1,1.500D-4, 0.1, 1,
80.0, NA NA 23 4 -6 6.065, 0.1, 3.37, 292.7,1.500D-4, 25.9, 1,
80.0, NA NA 3
6-7 7.951, 0.1,
.91, 61.4,1.5 COD-4, 0.2, 1,
80.0, NA NA 4:
7-B 7.870, 1,
4.9, 30.1.1.500D-4, 0.3, 1,
80.0, NA NA 5:
8-9 9.516, 1,
07.8, 59.7,1.500D-4, 4.3, 1,
80.0, NA NA 6:
9-10 9.172, 1,
.98, 106.3,1.500D-4,
-60.6, 1,
80.0, NA NA 7
10 - 11 9.172,1.81, 42, 94.2,1.500D-4,
-0.3, 1,
80.0, NA NA 8
11 - 12 0.152, 6,
10.4, 102.1,1.500D-4, 9.0, 1,
80.0, NA NA 9: 12 - 18 3.150, 6,
.62, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 1,
80.0, NA NA 10: 18 - 19 0.346, 6,
.59, 26.2,1.500D-4,
-4.6, 1,
80.0, NA NA 11: 19 - 20 0.886, 108, 104.30, 495.3,8.202D-5, 27.0, 1,
80.0, NA N*
12: 20 - 21 0.874, 108,
.01, 12.2,8.202D-5, 0.9, 1,
80.0, NA NA 20: 21 - 22 0.878, 024,
.72, 0.0,8.200D-5, 0.0, 1,
80.0, NA NA 14: 22 - 23, 0.724, 024, 209.50, 26.0,0.200D-5, 2.2, 1,
80.0, NA NA 15: 23 - 20A, 0.724, 324, 0.00, 2467.0,8.202D-5, 4.0, 1,
81.4, NA NA 16 20A-238, 0.724, 024, 0.00, 0.0,0.002D-5, 0.0, 1,
81.4, NA NA 17: 23B-24 0.724, 024, 0.00, 0.0,8.202D-5, 0.0, 1,
81.4, NA,
NA 18: 24 - 24A, 0.550, 324, 0.11, 1818.0,8.202D-6, 2.7, 1,
95.6, NA NA 19: 24A-25, 0.550, 024, 0.00, 0.0,8.202D-6, 0.0, 1,
95.6, NA NA 20: 25 - 26 0.590, 324,
.77, 166.0,0.202D-6, 4.6, 1,
108.4, NA NA 21 26 - 26A, 0.590, 324, 0.00, 1540.1,0.202D-6,
-3.3, 1,
181.7, NA NA 22: 26A-27 0.590, 024, 0.00, 0.0,8.202D-6, 0.0, 1,
181.7, NA NA 23: 27 - 28, 0.590, 324, 1.34, 270.1,0.200D-6,
-11.0, 1,
255.0, NA N'
24: 28 - 29, 0.768, 108, 0.12, 15.3,8.200D-6,
-0.9, 1,
255.0, NA NA 25: 29 - 30 0.969, 108,.
1.48, 525.6,8.202D-6,
-27.0, 1,
255.0, NA NA 26: 30 - 31, 3.800, 6,
.66, 23.0.1.500D-4, 4.6, 1, 255.0, NA N'
27: 31 -200, 5.826, 6,
1.5, 182.2,1.500D-4, 49.0, 1,
255.0, NA NA 28: 200-201 4.411, 1,
.60, 4.3,1.500D-4, 0.0, 1,
255.0, NA NA 29:
HV-A 4.411, 1,
0.0, 0.0,1.5000-4, 0.0, 6,
255.0,11 0.0, 1.0 30: 201-202, 4.411, 1,
.11, 14.2,1.500D-4, 1.0, 1,
255.0, NA NA 01:
HV-B 4.411, 1,
0.0, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 6,
255.0, 163.0, 1.0 32: 200-203, 4.411, 1,
.11, 17.4,1.500D-4, 1.3, 1,
255.0, NA NA 03: 200-204 4.411, 1,
1.0, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 1,
255.0, NA NA 34: 204-204A, 4.411, 2,
1.0, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 1, 255.0, NA NA
CALC. 82-18, REV, -
ATTACHMENT B PAGE 2 OF 2 FLOW = G40 GPM AT 00 AF?
USE PUMF CURVE LOR ENTER PRESSURE 3 (Y/N):Y7 TYPE Or-FUMF (ENTER NO. FROM 1 TO 5): 17 F UMP (S) ARRANGEMENT (ONE=0 - FARALLEl.=1 - SERIES =2):
0*
ADDITIONAL FLOW (USE WDIV=0.1 IN INPUT FILE!)= 160 GPM' FLOW G FUMP =1100.00 GPM AT 00.06F 102.90 FT/ STAGE FUMF HEAD
=
FILE:FWTOMSVL.DAT - NO. OF SECTIONS = 34
- TWO-PHASE SECTIONS *D1VIDER= 10 SECTION ID M
FLOW P(IN)
P(OUT)
- 1 :
1
-4 10.020 14.0 547,020 145.1 142.0 4-6 6.065 8.0 547,022 142.3 123.2 0
6-7 7.981 1.9 547,022 125.2 122.5 4 :
7-O 7.870 5.4 467,455 122.5 120.9 5
0-9 9.516 38.7 467,455 120.9 114.4 6:
9-10 9.172-3.1 467,455 114.4 140.1 7
10 - 11 9.172 0.0 258,262 140.1 140.1-12 3.152 12.4 77,909 140.1 132.8 8
11 9: 10 - 18 3.150 0.6 77,909 132.8 132.6 10: 18 - 19 3.046 1.1 77,909 100.6 134.4 11: 19 - 20 0.886 116.9 4,328 1 4.4 106.7 l
12 20 - 21 0.074 0.3 4,328 106.7 106.3 oo FRESS sCR, 'TO CONTINUE **
SECTION ID L
FLOW P(IN)
P(OUT) 1~
21 - 22 0.898 0.7 1,440 106.3 106.~
14: 2
- 20 0.724 210.0 1,440 106.3 98.1 15: 0; - 20A 0.724 74.8 1,445 98.1 93.5 16: 20A-2;B 0.724 0.0 1,440 90.5 93.5 17: 205-24 0.724 0.0 1,440 93.5 93.5 18: 24 - 04A C.550 46.2 1,440 93.5 87.6 19: 24A-25 0.550 0.0 1,443 87.6 87.6 00: 25 - 26 0.590 4.9 1,440 87.6 85.0 21: Oc - 26A 0.590 03.8 1,440 85.2 83.9
~C - O!
3.800 1.1 77,909 98.0 96.0 27: 31 -200 5.826 4.5 77,909 96.0 75.9 26: 200-201 4.411 0.7 467,455 75.9 74.1 l
CG:
H.*-A 4.411 0.0 467,455 74.1 73.4 Wer=0,6:4,98~
30 201-200 4.411 0.0 467,455 73.4 71.9 Ole HJ-D 4.411 0.0 467,455 71.9 36.9 Wer=
507,6~7
)
00: 20~-207 4.411 0.4 467,455 36.9 35.5 03: 2C0-004 4.411 1.0 467,455 35.3
~.2. 6 l
04: 204-204A 4.411 1.0 005,728X 02.6 12.5 X:!N= 0.00 OUT=
4.03 oo FRCSS CR.
10 CONTINUE **
SECTION ID 6
FLOW P(IN)
P(OU1) 00 FREs3URE A1 EIG OF SYSTEM =
1".5 PSIA hEFEAT WITH NEW CONDITIONS (Y/N)"
l
(
CALC. 82-18, REY. -
ATTACHMENT C PAGE 1 OF 2
- FILE: FWTOMSVL.DAT ***
EL
-FL.-
TF
- MIN
- MAX ID
-WDIV-k(FIX)- K(VAR)-
EPS SECT!DN 34 1 :
1
-4
,10.000, 0.1, 5.88, 522.1,1.5000-4, 2.1, 1,
80.0, NA NA 23 4
-6 6.065, 0.1,
~.07, 292.7,1.500D-4, 25.9, 1,
80.0, NA NA 3
6-7 7.981, 0.1,
.91, 61.4,1.500D-4, 0.2, 1,
80.0, NA NA 4 :
7-8 7.870, 1,
4.9, 30.1,1.5000-4, 0.3, 1,
80.0, NA NA 5:
8-9 9.516, 1,
37.8, 59.7,1.500D-4, 4.3, 1,
80.0, NA NA 6:
9-10 9.172, 1,
.98, 136.3,1.500D-4,
~60.6, 1,
80.0, NA NA 7
10 - 11 9.172,1.81, 42, 94.2,1.500D-4,
-0.3, 1,
80.0, NA NA B: 11 - 12
~.152, 6,
10.4, 102.1,1.500D-4, 9.0, 1,
80.0, NA NA 9
12 - 18 3.150, 6,
.62, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 1,
80.0, NA NA 1C: 18 - 19 3.346, 6,
.59, 26.2,1.500D-4,
-4.6, 1,
80.0, NA NA 11: 19 - 20 0.886, 108, 104.30, 495.3,8.202D-5, 27.0, 1,
80.0, NA NA-12: 20 - 21 0.874, 108,
.01, 12.2,0.202D-5, 0.9, 1,
80.0, NA NA 13: 21 - 20, 0.898, 324,
.72, 0.0,8.202D-5, 0.0, 1,
80.0, NA NA 14: 22 - 23, 0.724,.024, 209.50, 26.0,0.002D-5, 2.2, 1,
80.0, NA NA 15: 23 - 23A, 0.724, 324, 0.00, 2467.3,8.202D-5, 4.8, 1,
81.3, NA NA 16: 23A-23B, 0.724, 324, 0.00, 0.0,0.002D-5, 0.0, 1,
81.3, NA NA 17: 23B-24 0.724, 324, 0.00, 0.0,0.202D-5, 0.0, 1,
82.6, NA NA 18: 24 - 24A, 0.550, 324, 0.11, 1818.0,0.202D-6, 2.7, 1,
95.5, NA NA 19: 24A-25, 0.550, 324, 0.00, 0.0,8.202D-6, 0.0, 1,
95.5, NA NA 20: 25 - 26 0.590, 324,
.77, 166.8,8.202D-6, 4.6, 1,
108.3, NA NA 21: 26 - 26A, 0.590,
~24, 0.00, 1540.1,8.202D-6,
-3.3, 1,
181.7, NA NA 22: 26A-27 0.590, 304, 0.00, 0.0,0.002D-6, 0.0, 1,
181.7, NA NA 23: 27 - 28 0.590, 304, 1.34, 270.1,8.200D-6, -11.0, 1,
255.0, NA NA 24: 28 - 29 0.768, 100, 0.12, 15.3,8.200D-6,
-0.9, 1,
255.0, NA NA 25: 29 - 00, 0.969, 108,,
1.48, 525.6,0.2000-6,
-27.0, 1, 265.0, NA NA 26: 30 - 31 3.803, 6,
.66, 23.0,1.500D-4, 4.6, 1,
255.0, NA NA 27: 31 -200 5.826, 6,
1.5, 102.2,1.500D-4, 49.0, 1,
255.0, NA NA 28: 200-201 4.411, 1,
.60, 4.3,1.5000-4, 0.0, 1, 255.0, NA NA 4.411, 1,
0.0, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 6,
255.0.1130.0, 1.C 27:
HV-A 30: 201-202 4.411, 1,
.11, 14.2,1.500D-4, 1.3, 1,
255.0, NA NA 31:
HV-B 4.411, 1,
0.0, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 6, 255.0, 162.0, 1.0 32: 202-203, 4.411, 1,
.11, 17.4,1.5000-4, 1.3, 1, 255.0, NA NA 33: 203-204 4.411, 1,
1.0, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 1,
255.0, NA NA 34: 204-204A, 4.411, 2,
1.0, 0.0,1.500D-4, 0.0, 1, 255.0, NA,
NA
c.
CALC. 82-18, REV. -
ATTACEMENT C PAGE 2 OF 2 l
l FLOW = 906 GFM AT 90 sF?
USE PUMP CURVE COR ENTER FRESSURE3 (Y/N):Y?
l T YFE OF PUMP (ENTER NO. FROM 1 TO 5): 1 ?
PUMP (S) ARRANGEMENT (ONE=0 - PARALLEL =1 - SERIES =O): 0?
ADDITIONAL FLOW (USE WDIV=0.1 IN INFUT FILE!)= 175 GFM?
FLOW 4 PUMP =1111.00 GFM AT
- 80. 0 vF PUMP HEAD
=
102.79 FT/ STAGE l
. FILE FWTOMSVL.DAT - NO. OF SECTIONS = 34
- TWO-PHASE SECTIONS' DIVIDER = 10 l
l SECTION ID K
FLOW P(IN)
P(OUT) 1 :
1
-4 10.020 14.0 552,492 145.0 142.2 2
4 -6 6.065 8.0 552,492 140.0 102.8 0
6-7 7.981 1.9 552,492 122.8 122.1 4
7-8 7.870 5.4 465,466 122.1 100.6 5
8-9 9.516 38.7 465,466 100.6 114.1 6
9-10 9.172 3.1 465,466 114.1 109.8 7
10 - 11 9.172 0.0 257,163 109.8 109.8 8
11 - 10 3.152 10.4 77,578 109.8 132.5 9
12 - 18 3.150 0.6 77,578 132.5 102.4 l
10 18 - 19 0.046 1.1 77,578 132.4 104.1 11: 19 - 20 0.886 116.9 4,310 104.1 106.6 12: 20 - 21 0.874 0.3 4,310 106.6 106.1 00 FRESS
<CR1 TO CONTINUE **
l SECTION ID K
FLOW P(IN)
P(OUT) i 13: 01 - 02 0.898 0.7 1,437 106.1 106.1 l
14: 22 - 20 0.724 210.3 1,437 106.1 98.1 15 20 - 23A 0.724 74.9 1,437 98.1 93.5 16 20A-23B 0.724 0.0 1,437 93.5 93.5 17:
O'B-24 0.704 0.0 1,437 93.5 90.5
[
IB: 24 - 24A 0.550 46.3 1,407 93.5 87.6 l
19: 24A-25 0.550 0.0 1,437 87.6 87.6 l
20: 25 - 26 0.590 4.9 1,437 87.6 85.0 21 26 - 26A 8.590 33.0 1,437 85.2 83.9 22: 26A-27 8.590 0.0 1,407 83.9 83.9 20: 27 - 28 5.590 6.8 1,437 80.9 87.9 l
24: 28 - 29 8.768 0.4 4,310 87.9 88.1 l
23: 29 - 00 B.969 10.0 4,310 88.1 98.1 26: 30 - 31 3.803 1.1 77,578 98.1 96.0 27: 31 -200 5.006 4.5 77,578 96.0 76.0 20 000-001 4.411 0.7 465,466 76.0 74.1 l
09:
HV-A 4.411 0.0 465,466 74.1 73.4 Wer=0,606,777 00: 201-002 4.411 0.3 465,466 73.4 72.0 01:
HV-B 4.411 0.0 465,466 72.0 36.8 Wer=
506,860 32: 200-200 4.411 0.4 465,466 06.8 35.2 00 000-004 4.411 1.0 465,466 05.7 02.5 34: 204-204A 4.411 1.0 232,703X 32.5 12.5 X !N= 0.00 OUT=
4.04 00 FRESS
<CR)
TO CONTINUE **
SECTION ID K
FLOW P(IN)
P(OUT) oo F6 ESSURE AT END OF SYSTEM =
10.5 FSI A TQQ9 D8900 CGd @D28?DGRD 0%)?
"ethoutATEo" CIRE WATER FLOW PATH 70 CIRCut.ATCR WATER TURBihjE$
C=,
2 Q
COMDEMSATE DEMINERA1.EER POMP V-31G6 EMERGEty CONDEMSATE HEADER v-3Dee O 31204 PI-Pol.NSoutc, FLCM/hAETER E
/
c N
X RJ 21257 HV-2iO9-1 SV-2tO9 s
ClRCULATOR i's % N EMERGENCf WATEq E5005IER PUMP 3L-2IddbO-D/6
- A g,< 4 P-2t lO 9 2. ?
5 8
5 t';
-