HBL-87-007, Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jul-Dec 1986

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML20212D759)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jul-Dec 1986
ML20212D759
Person / Time
Site: Humboldt Bay
Issue date: 12/31/1986
From:
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
HBL-87-007, HBL-87-7, NUDOCS 8703040196
Download: ML20212D759 (20)


Text

a - _m h

h HUMBOLDT BAY POWER PLANT

. UNIT 3 SEMIANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT JULY 1 - DECEMBER 31,1986 l

l

=

57

/

?

P G =. a > E gu nan Blasj!ga

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-133 LICENSE NO. DPR-7 RADI0 ACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASES AND WASTE DISPOSAL FROM HUMBOLDT BAY POWER PLANT UNIT NO. 3, COVERING THE PERIOD JULY 1, 1986 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1986 This report summarizes the quantity of each of the principal radiunuclides released in liquids and gaseous effluents to unrestricted areas and summarizes radioactive waste disposal from July 1, 1986 through December 31, 1986. This report is required by Section IX.I.3.a of the Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit No. 3, Technical Specifications.

A. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

1. Regulatory Limits:
a. Fission and activation gases: The current license limits are 50,000 micro-Curies per second for an annual average release rate and 500,000 micro-Curies per second for an instantaneous release.
b. Iodines: Refertoc.(Particulates).
c. Particulates: The current license limit "for halogens and particulate material based on the isotopes present on the sample filters after 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> decay period" is 0.18 micro-Curies per second.
d. Liquid Effluents: 10CFR20.
2. Maximum Permissible Concentrations:

The concentrations used to determine allowable release rates or concentrations are as follows:

Gaseous effluents:

a. Fission and activation gases: Not applicable.
b. Iodines: 3E-10 micro-Curies per cc.
c. Particulates (half-lives >8 days): 3E-10 micro-Curies per cc, Liquid effluents:
a. 10CFR20, Table II, Appendix B. Refer to Table C1 for the values used, based on the mixturas for each quarter.

DCPP2 1 1

3. Average energy:

Not applicable.

4. Measurements and Approximations of Total Radioactivity:

The methods used to measure or approximate the total radioactivity in effluents and to determine radionuclide composition are as follows:

a. Fission and activation gases: Due to the long decay time since operation (shutdown July 2, 1976) no detectable releases of fission and activation gases can be expected. Accordingly, these radionuclides are not reported,
b. Iodines: Due to the long decay time since operation (shutdown July 2, 1976) no detectable releases of radioactive iodines of plant origin can be expected. Since the license no longer requires that these radionuclides be monitored, these radionuclides are not reported.
c. Particulates: Filter papers are removed from the stack sampling system weekly and, after 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> decay, are analyzed for gross alpha (Internal Proportional Counter) and the concentration of gamma emitting nuclides (Intrinsic Germanium detector). All statistically significant peaks are identifed.

The filters for each quarter are analyzed for radioactive Strontium (all Sr-90 due to decay time).

The error of the reported particulate release values is estimated based on uncertainty in sample flow rate, stack flow rate, detector calibration, and typical sample counting statistics.

d. Liquid effluents: Liquid waste batch sarrples vere gamma spectrum counted and counted for gross beta radioactivity. All statistically important peaks were identified. Quarterly composites of all batches were anal Tritium and radioactive Strontium (yzed for gross alpha, Sr-90).

The error of the reported release values is estimated based on uncertainty in sample volume, batch volume, detector calibration, and typical sample counting statistics.

5. Batch releases:
a. Liquid:
1) Number of batch releases: 44 (A total of 16,089 gallons of laundry waste and 128,280 gallons of treated waste tank discharge).

DCPP2 2

2) Total time period for batch releases: 7.40E3 minutes.
3) Average time period for a batch release: 1.68E2 minutes.
4) Maximum time period for a batch release: 4.77E2 minutes.
5) Minimum time period for a batch release: 5.00E0 minutes.
6) Average stream flow during periods of release of effluents into a flowin Not applicable (Discharge is into HumboldtBay)gstream: .
b. Gaseous: None.
6. Abnormal releases:
a. Liquid:
1) Number of releases: None.
2) Total activity released: None.
b. Gaseous:
1) Number of releases: None.
2) Total activity released: None.

B. GASEOUS EFFLUENTS The monitoring systems associated with the liquid radwaste system vent to atmosphere indicated that no detectable releases of radioactive gases occurred during the report period. Because quarterly checks of the HEPA filters on the vent were satisfactory, only gaseous radioactive waste releases made via the 250 foot stack are reported.

Table B-1 summarizes the total quantities of radioactive effluents released by quarter. Table B-2 summarizes the total quantities for each of the nuclides determined to be released.

C. LIQUID EFFLUENTS Analysis of weekly composite samples from the plant intake and the plant effluent canal and monitoring by the liquid radwaste discharge monitor confirmed that no unaccounted release of radioactive waste occurred during the report period.

Table C-1 summarizes the total quantities of radioactive liquid effluents released by quarter. Table C-2 summarizes the total quantity for each of the nuclides determined to be released.

DCPP2 3

~ _ _ _ _ _ _

D. SOLID WASTE During the report period, a total of 148.8 cubic meters of solid radioactive waste, totaling 14.5 Curies, was shipped. Table D-1 summarizes these radioactive waste shipments.

E. RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN Plant releases continued to be much lower than when the plant last operated. A comparison of calculated doses by various paths has shown that the off-site doses are primarily due to direct radiatinn and to the consumption of aquatic foods. Other pathways contribute less than 5% of the total doses to the public. Maximum doses to indivirtuals are summarized in Table El. These doses comply with 40CFR190 since there are no other fuel cycle facilities within 8 km.

1. Doses to the average individual in the population from all receiving-water-related pathways were calculated for the releases detected, based on the guidance of Regulatory Guide 1.109. The maximum results were 0.011 mrem per Yr (Total Dody) for the Adult age group, and 0.016 mrem per Yr for the bone of the Child age group.
2. Total body doses to the average individual in the population from gaseous effluents to a distance of 50 miles from the site were calculated on a comparative basis and found to be insignificant.

The highest potential calculated dose is less than 0.005 mrem per Yr.

3. Total body doses to the average individual in unrestricted areas from direct radiation from the facility have been measured with 30 dosimeter stations (Figure 1) in the vicinity of the Plant.

Ionization chambers, read on a biweekly basis, are used for

dosimetry. Stations 2 and 5 are considered to be background in that they are assumed to be completely removed from the influence of the plant. In order to test for statisticall between stations, two statistical tests (ya significant differences two-way classification, and a 95% confidence limit least significant difference test) were made for the dosimeter station readings. The following table summarizes the results of this analysis. The report period e::posure results for each station were based on biweekly data extrapolated to 26 weeks and are listed in order from highest to lowest exposures.

i DCPP2 4

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF D0SIMETRY DATA 1 (SECONDHALF0F1986)

MEAN-(mR) WEEKS OF TOTAL (mR) g}3J!gy {2,y(([,((B!gg} ,,9313,, {2g,y(([,((3}gg}

16 4.1 26 53.1 9 4.1 26 53.0 15 3.9 26 50.3 27 3.8 26 49.7 18 3.7 26 48.5 1 3.7 26 48.2 22 3.7 26 48.1 2 3.6 26 47.2 3 3.6 26 47.0 5 3.6 26 46.8 20 3.6 26 46.8 29 3.6 26 46.6 28 3.6 26 46.4 10 3.5 26 46.0 17 3.5 26 45.7 25 3.5 26 45.7 11 3.5 26 45.5 4 3.5 26 45.0 7 3.5 26 44.9 8 3.5 26 44.9 23 3.4 26 44.5 19 3.4 26 44.0 6 3.3 26 43.4 14 3.3 26 43.3 26 3.3 26 43.3 21 3.3 26 42.7 13 3.3 26 42.6 24 3.3 26 42.5 12 3.2 26 41.8 30 3.1 26 39.7 Least Significant Difference between station means = 0.5 l

l Least Significant Difference between replication means = 3.7 l

Stations 2 and 5 are considered background.

l DCPP2 5 i

F. METEOROLOGICAL DATA The meteorological data logging system was removed from service in 1967.

Therefore, the information specified by Regulatory Guide 1.21, Appendix B, Section F, is not readily available for this report period.

Table F1 summarizes the cumulative joint frequency distribution of wind speed, direction, and atmospheric stability for the period April,1962 through June, 1967 when the meteorological data logging system was in service.

i i

i I

DCPP2 6

TABLE B1 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT - 1986 GASE0US EFFLUENTS - SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES UNIT THIRD FOURTH EST. TOTAL QUARTER QUARTER ERROR, %

A. FISSION GASES

1. Total Release ti- ** ** **
2. Average Release micro-Ci Rate for Period per sec. ** **
3. Percent of Tech.

I Spec. Limit  % ** **

B. 10 DINES

1. Total I-131 Ci ** ** **

i-

2. Average Release . micro-Ci Rate for Period per sec. ** **
3. Percent of Tech.

Spec. Limit  % ** **

i' C. PARTICULATES

1. Total with Half-lives >8 DAYS Ci 2.37E-5 3.34E-5 3.00E1 .
2. Average Release micro-Ci Rate for Period per sec. 2.98E-6 4.20E-6
3. Percent of Tech.

Spec. Limit  % 1.66E-3 2.33E-3

4. Gross Alpha Radio-activity Ci 5.99E-7 1.44E-6 D. TRITIUM
1. Total Release Ci LT1.00E-2 LT1.00E-2 5.00E1

! 2. Average Release micro-C1 l Rate for Period per sec. LT1.26E-3 LT1.26E-3 l

! Note: **No release can be expected due to decay time since shutdown

! (July 2, 1976). Accordingly, no release is reported.

i i

i

DCPP2 7

TABLE B2 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT - 1986 GASE0US EFFLUENTS - ELEVATED RELEASES - CONTINUOUS MODE NUCLIDES RELEASED UNIT THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER A. FISSION GASES Krypton-85 Ci ** **

Krypton-85m C1 ** **

Krypton-87 Ci ** **

Krypton-88 Ci ** **

Xenon-133 Ci ** **

Xenon-135 Ci ** **

Xenon-135m Ci ** **

Xenon-138 C1 ** **

Total for period Ci ** **

B. 10 DINES Iodine-131 C1 ** **

Iodine-133 Ci ** **

Iodina-135 Ci ** **

Unidentified C1 ** **

Total for period Ci ** **

1 C. PARTICULATES Strontium-89 Ci ** **

Strontium-90 C1 1.23E-7 2.51E-7 Cesium-134 ,((i Ci LT4.55E-6 LT4.03E-6 Cesium-137 , , . ,

Ci 1.10E-5 1.13E-5 Ci ** **

Barium / Lanthanum-140 _

Cobalt-60 Ci 1.26E-5 2.18E-5 Manganese-54 Ci ** **

Antimony-125 C1 LT4.55E-6 LT4.03E-6 Europium-154 C1 LT4.55E-6 LT4.03E-6 Unidentified Ci LT4.55E-6 LT4.03E-6 Total for period C1 2.37E-5 3.34E-5 Note: ** No release can be expected due to decay time since shutdown (July 2, 1976). Accordingly, no release is reported.

DCPP2 8 I - _ _

l l

l 1

TABLE C1 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT - 1986 LIQUID EFFLUENTS - SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES UNIT THIRD FOURTH EST. TOTAL QUARTER QUARTER ERROR, %

A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS

1. Total release (not including tritium, gases,oralpha) Ci 7.86E-3 1.01E-2 1.50E1
2. Average diluted concentration micro-Ci during period per ml 4.12E-10 7.21E-10
3. Percent of applicable limit  % 5.48E-3 1.26E-2
4. Applicable limit micro-Ci used (Mixture MPC) per ml 7.52E-6 5.73E-6 B. TRITIUM
1. Total release C1 3.51E-2 1.03E-2 1.50El
2. Average diluted concentration micro-Ci during period per ml 1.84E-9 7.36E-10
3. Percent of applicable limit  % 6.13E-5 2.45E-5 C. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES
1. Total release Ci ** ** **

D. GROSS ALPHA RADI0 ACTIVITY

1. Total release C1 LT3.33E-5 LT4.31E-5 5.00El--

E. Volume of waste released dilution)(priorto liters 2.38E5 3.08E5 1.00E1

F. Volume of dilution water used during period liters 1.91E10 1.40E10 1.50E1 Note: ** No release can be expected due to decay time since shutdown (July 2, 1976). Accordingly, no release is reported.

DCPP2 9

L l

TABLE C2 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT - 1986 LIQUID EFFLUENTS - BATCH MODE NUCLIDES RELEASED UNIT THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER Strontium-89 C1 ** **

Strontium-90 Ci 2.02E-4 3.95E-4 Cesium-134 C1 9.01E-5 8.61E-5 Cesium-137 C1 6.61E-3 6.78E-3 Iodine-131 C1 ** **

Cobalt-58 Ci ** **

Cobalt-60 C1 9.57E-4 2.81E-3 Iron-59 Ci ** **

Zinc-65 Ci ** **

Manganese-54 C1 ** **

Chromium-51 C1 ** **

Zirconium / Niobium-95 Ci ** **

Molybdenum-99 Ci ** **

Technetium-99m Ci ** **

Barium / Lanthanum-140 C1 ** **

Cerium-141 Ci ** **

Unidentified C1 LT1.50E-5 LT1.33E-5 Total for period (above) Ci 7.86E-3 1.01E-2 Xenon-133 C1 ** **

Xenon-135 Ci ** **

Note: ** No release can be expected due to decay time since shutdown (July 2, 1976). Accordingly, no release is reported.

DCPP2 10

TABLE D1 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT SFCOND HALF 0F 1986 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS A. SOLID WASTE SHIFPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not irradiated fuel)

1. TYPE OF WASTE UNIT 6-MONTH EST. TOTAL PERIOD ERROR %
a. Spent resins, filter Cubic sludges, evaporator Meter 1.93E+01 1.0E+01 bottums, etc. Ci 9.31E+00 1.5E+01
b. Dry compressible Cubic waste, contaminated Meter 1.28E+02 1.0E+01 equipment, etc. Ci 4.18E+00 2.0E+01
c. Irradiated components Cubic control rods, etc. Meter None -----

Ci None -----

d. Other (absorbed Cubie liquids) Meter 1.49E+00 1.0E401 Ci 3.61E-01 1.5E+01
2. Estimate of major nuclide composition (by type of waste).

i TYPE NUCLIDE

a. H-3  % 1.89E-01 0-14  % 6.88E-03 Fe-55  % 5.llE+01 Co-60  % 2.57E+01~~

Ni-63  % 2.14E+00 Sr-90  % 5.89E-01 Tc-99  % 8.59E-04 I-129  % 1.00E-04 Cs-134  % 1.78E-01 Cs-137  % 1.88E+01 Eu-154  % 1.36E-01 Pu-241  % 1.15E+00 t

[

DCPP2 11 ._ -- - .- . -_. - . .

TABLE D1 (Continued)

TYPE NUCLIDE

b. H-3  % 2.72E-02 C-14  % 2.53E-02 K-40  % 2.07E-02 Mn-54  % 4.61E-03 Fe-55  % 6.74E+01 Co-60  % 9.80E+00 N1-59  % 5.15E-03 Ni-63  % 2.91E+00 Zn-65  % 2.09E-02 Sr-90  % 6.93E-01 Nb-94  % 1.60E-01 Tc-99  % 2.09E+00 Sb-125  % 8.58E-03 I-129  % 3.50E-02 Cs-134  % 1.16E-01 Cs-137  % 9.82E+00 Ce-144  % 3.35E-03 Eu-152  % 3.71E+00 ~~

Eu-154  % 1.77E-02 EU-155  % 1.83E+00 Pu-238  % 3.77E-04 Pu-241  % 1.28E+00 Am-241  % 4.94E-03 Cm-243  % 1.63E-03 Cm-244  % 1.63E-03

d. H-3  % 3.69E-03 C-14  % 4.21E-03 Fe-55  % 7.57E+01 Co-60  % 8.97E+00 Ni-63  % 3.05E+00 Nb-94  % 4.71E-01 Tc-99  % 2.69E+00 1-129  % 4.49E-02 Cs-137  % 3.13E-01 Ce-144  % 6.93E-02 Eu-152  % 4.75E+00 Eu-154  % 1.44E-01 Eu-155  % 2.30E+00 Pu-241  % 1.44E+00 Am-241  % 3.05E-02
3. Solid Waste Disposition:

Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation Destination 13 Truck Richland, Washington B. IRRADIATEDFUELSHIPMENTS(Disposition)

Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation Destination l

None --- ---

DCPP2 12

9 TABLE El EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT SECOND HALF 0F 1986 MAXIMUM 0FF-SITE DOSES AND DOSE COMMITMENTS TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ANNUAL DOSE, MILLIREM (9)

First Second Third Fourth Four Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter SOURCE 1986 1986 1986 1986 Average 0.04(6) 0.10(6) 0.03(6) 0.05(6) 0.06 Liquid Effluents (1? 0.05(7) 0.15(7) 0.05(8) 0.07(8) 0.08 Airborne Effluents (5)

Iodines & Particulates (2) -- -- -- -- --

. Noble Gases (3) -- -- -- -- --

Direct Radiation (4) 0.30 0.34 0.13 0.21 0.25 Notes: 1. Maximum total body and organ doses to individuals in unrestricted areas from receiving-water-related exposure pathways have been calculated for detected liquid releases, based on the average concentrations for the report period, and the generic parameters of Regulatory Guide 1.109.

2. Total body and skin doses to individuals exposed at the point of maximum off-site ground-level concentrations of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents were not calculated because there were no significant releases of radioactive noble gases.
3. Organ doses to individuals in unrestricted areas from radioactive Iodine and radioactive Particulates for all pathways of exposure were calculated on a comparative basis and found to be insignificant. The highest potential calculated dose to any organ of an individual is less than 0.005 mrem /Yr.

4.Totalbodydoses(tothemaximumindividualinthepopulation)are (

based on TLD results of stations at the site boundary, using the-shore-line occupancy factors given in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for.the maximum potential individual (Teen age group).

5. Based on meteorology data as discussed in section F.
6. Total Body (Adult age group)
7. Liver (Teen age group)
8. Bone (Childagegroup)
9. The dose shown for each quarter is calculated on an annual basis for four identical quarters.

DCPP2 13

TABLE F1 PERCENT OF TIME FOR EACH WIND SPEED AND DIRECTION FOR THE PERIOD APRIL, 1962 THROUGH JUNE 1967 RECORDED AT THE 250 FOOT ELEVATION STABILITY CLASS: PASQUILL 'C' WIND WINDSPEED(MPH)

DIRECTION ------------------------------------------------------

(DEGREES) 0-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 Total 0 0.02 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.20 10 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.13 20 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.08 30 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 40 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.02 50 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 60 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 120 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 130 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.03 140 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 150 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.06 160 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.04 170 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.07 180 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.05 190 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.04 200 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.09 210 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.13 220 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.19 230 0.01 0.06 0.12 0.14 0.05 0.02 0.39 240 0.01 0.09 0.22 0.15 0.02 0.03 0.51 250 0.02 0.18 0.26 0.10 0.02 0.00 0.58 260 0.02 0.13 0.24 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.44 270 0.02 0.16 0.22 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.42 280 0.02 0.13 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.27 290 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.24 300 0.01 0.09 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 310 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.12 320 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 330 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.11 340 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.15 350 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.07 0.05 0.01 0.22 Rows may not sum to exact total due to rounding off.

I TABLE F1 (Cost)

PERCENT OF TIME FOR EACH WIND SPEED AND DIRECTION FOR THE PERIOD APRIL, 1962 THROUGH JUNE 1967 RECORDED AT THE-250 FOOT ELEVATION STABILITY CLASS: PASQUILL 'D' WIND ,

WINDSPEED(MPH) ,

DIRECTION ------------------------------------------------------

t (DEGREES) 0-3 4-7 8-12 . 13-18 19-24 >24 Total

~

I

[# 0 0.11 0.34 0.78 0.85 0.49 0.48 3.05 10 0.04 0.27 0.52 0.46' . 0.38 0.27 1.95 20 0.05 0.21 0.32 0.15 ' " ' O.16 0.11 1.04 30 0.06 0.20 0.16 0.08 0.03 0.04 0.58 40 0.05 0.11 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.23 50 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.16

. 60 0.04 0.08 0.04 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.15 Op . 70 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.01 ,i 0.00 0.00 0.08 iC 80 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.07 90 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.00 , 0.00 0.00 0.09 100 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 110 0.00 .0.i03 0.01 .0.01 0.00 0.00 0.06 120 0.02' O.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.11 130 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.10 140 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.13 150 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.09 0.03 0.02 0.23 160 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.10 0.04 0.01 0.26 170 0.02 0.05 0.12 0.16 0.04 0.01 0.40 180 0.04~ 0.08 0.12~ '0.13 0.03 0.01 0.40 190 '0.02 0.07 0.09 0.06 0.03 0.02 0.28 200 0.05 0.10 0.17 0.11 0.02 0.01 0.46 210 ~0.05 0.12 0.20 0.08 0.04 0.01 0.51 l - 220 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.05 0.02 0.51 l 230 0.03 0.14 0.17 0.11 0.06 0.02 0.53 l 240 O.08 0.22 0.21 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.61 250 0.08 0.17 0.13 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.43

/ 260' O 08 0.22 0.13 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.47 270 0.12 0.21 0.11 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.49 N' 280 0.05 0.20 0.11 0.04 0.00- 0.00 0.40 290 0.04 0.22 0.11 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.39 s 300 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.53 310 0.08 OL28 0.19 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.60 320 0.07 0.25 0.33 0.09 0.04 0.01 0.80 330 0.06 0.21 0.35 0.16 0.09 0.03 0.90 340: s 0.07 0.24 0.50 0.47 0.17 0.08 1.53 350 0.07 0.30 0.82 0.86 0.49 0.33 2.87 1

I' l t

y Rows may not sum to exact total due to rounding off.

Y DCPP2 15,

p b 1

4 TABLE F1 (Cont)

~

PERCENT OF' TIME FOR EACH WIND SPEED AND DIRECTION ,

FOR THE PERIOD APRIL, 1962 THROUGH JUNE 1967 RECORDED AT THE 250 FOOT ELEVATION STA8ILITY CLASS: PASQUILL 'E' WIND- WINDSPEED(MPH)

DIRECTION -------------------------------------------------------

(DEGREES) 0-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 Total 0 -1.04 1.06 2.00 1.84 0.82 0.10 6.86 10 0.17- -0.80 1.55 0.90 0.36 0.10 3.78

20 0.30 0.83 1.26 0.47 0.13 0.00 2.99 30 0.37 0.73 0.64 0.19 0.01 0.00 1.94 40 0.21 0.60 0.47 0.02 0.00 0.00 1.31 50 0.18' O.56 0.28 0.02 0.00 0.00 1.05 60 0.21 0.54 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 70 0.19 0.44 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 80 0.20 0.41 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68
90 0.27 0.47 0.17 0.01 0.00 0.00- ~0.82 100 .0.17 0.24 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.49 110 0.20 0.31 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 120 -0.18 0.31 0.19 0.01- 0.02 0.00 0.70 130 0.14 0.25' O.08 0.08 0.03 0.03 0.72 140 10.09 0.22 0.21 0.23 0.22 0.25 1.21

! 150' O.09 0.24 0.22 0.45 0.52 0.46 2.08

. 160 0.05 0.22 0.25 0.62 0.44 0.21 1.79 170 0.04 0.26 0.43 0.73 0.23 0.09 1.89 180 0.26 0.32 0.45 0.43 0.20 0.02 1.77

. 190 0.15 0.26 0.37 0.35 0.15 0.02 1.20 l 200 0.22 0.48 0.47 0.26 0.18 0.06 1.77 210 0.20 0.44 0.58 0.18 0.05 0.04 0.60 220- 0.20 0.40 0.55 0.15 0.14 0.03 1.37

, 230 0.23 0.43 0.40 0.14 0.13 0.05 1.39 240 0.24 0.39 0.23 0.15 0.13 0.01 1.24 250 0.21 0.32 0.16 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.84 260 0.24 0.31 0.17 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.85 270 0.35 0.35 0.13 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.97 280 0.19 0.30 0.15 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.67 290 0.19 0.33 0.17 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.81 300 0.21 0.37 0.16 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.88 310 0.20 0.47 0.29 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.98 320 0.20 0.59 0.65 0.12 0.01 0.05 1.72 330 0.22 0.87 0.98 0.35 0.02 0.02 2.45

340 0.20 0.88 1.55 0.74 0.01 0.00 3.48 350 0.19 1.02 2.02 1.41 0.55 0.13 5.22 i Rows may not sum to exact total due to rounding off, i

DCPP2 16 _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ . _ . . _ , _ _ . . . _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ . . . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . .

TABLE F1 (Cont)

PERCENT OF TIME FOR EACH WIND SPEED AND DIRECTION FOR THE PERIOD APRIL, 1962 THROUGH JUNE 1967 RECORDED AT THE 250 FOOT ELEVATION STABILITY CLASS: PASQUILL 'F' WIND WIND SPEED (MPH)

DIRECTION ------------------------------------------------------

(DEGREES) 0-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 Total 0 0.42 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 '0.53 10 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.18 20 0.05 0.09 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.24 30 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.37 40 0.07 0.13 0.10 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.34 50 0.09 0.13 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 60 0.14 0.19 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.40 70 0.11 0.22 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 80 0.10 0.22 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 90 0.14 0.25 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 100 0.11 0.29 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.51 110 0.13 0.31 0.13 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.59 120 0.15 0.33 0.18 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.69 130 0.10 0.23 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.50 140 0.10 0.22 0.11 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.54 150 0.12 0.19 0.10 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.52 160 0.08 0.15 0.16 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.47 170 0.07 0.15 0.14 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.43 180 0.16 0.26 0.13 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.56 190 0.12 0.18 0.13 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.46 200 0.13 0.25 0.18 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.58 210 0.18 0.32 0.20 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.73 220 0.14 0.28 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.54 230 0.18 0.24 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.50 i 240 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.45 l 250 0.15 0.16 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 l

260 0.17 0.10 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 270 0.10 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 280 0.10 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 290 0.11 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 300 0.13 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.19 310 0.07 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 320 0.09 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 330 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 340 0.06 0.10 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.20 350 0.07 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.21 l Rows may not sum to exact total due to rounding off.

I DCPP2 17 . --. ._.

r "

,__) ,

l $7AT10:4 NVf8ER *,'** I.

hi T .

l 5 --- .

4 y,,

g4 U )fi-23 ARCATA 22 e 4 \g , 2...)

4-20 . .....,.

~~>-

19  % ,, ;,f getga s ,- y j7 y 3, 16 D 15 4 ftw tr KA  :

1 r= g 13 L --

' I" --

14 '

18 HUW80LDT SAY ,

t 21 - -r \ *POWER PLANT I g ***, ,

12 - ..-

\p 10 [I I DING' 'T 4 N 3- H

m. - 4, t

ii I

y5 -a M* n, e 0 ,, ,

y

~

g 3 . . .

=

N g8 2, ,

}-

l' g1 ea... ~- .

W

  • g l ORTUNA -

E~ n *' N I maw V ais -

asc

, QERNDALE\ .

ej l

T2N l

l D051METEF.5 & FIL't PACKS l ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATON STUDY l IN THE VICINITY OF MUMSOLDT SAY POWER PLANT ,

l PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY -

e i e s a s a sus

. Figure i

PACIFIC GAS AND E LE C T RIC C O M PANY

)bb C'*1b l 77 BEALE STREET

  • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNI A 94106 * (415) 781 4211 . TM 510-3 7 2-6587 JAMES D. SHIFFE R soucL1 RG A AYlON February 27, 1987 PGandE Letter No.: HBL-87-007 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Hashington D.C. 20555 Re: Docket No. 50-133, OL-DPR-7 Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit 3 Semlannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Gentlemen:

Enclosed is the Humboldt Bay Power Plant Unit 3 " Report on Radioactive Effluent Releases and Haste Disposal" covering the period from July 1 through December 31, 1986. This report is required by Section IX.I.3.a of the Humboldt Bay Unit 3 Technical Specifications and 10 CFR 50.36a(a)(2).

Kindly acknowledge receipt of this material on the enclosed copy of this letter and return it in the enclosed addressed envelope.

Sincerely,

/v /

Enclosure cc: John B. Hartin U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Joseph 0. Hard California Department of Health Services Paul Anderson Humboldt County Public Health Department Peter B. Erickson U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Humboldt Distribution Humboldt Service List 1308S/0049K/ERK/649

(