ML20211E486
| ML20211E486 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1985 |
| From: | LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO., TELEDYNE ISOTOPES |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20211E476 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8606160108 | |
| Download: ML20211E486 (143) | |
Text
--
I.
I 1
I I
I SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION I
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL l
MONITORING PROGRAM I
JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1985 I
ISSUED BY I
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEP ARTMENT I
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DEP ARTMENT I
I I
b!NSS I
i pr= =;;y I
i I
SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOF ING PROGRA'1 I
1985 ANNUAL REPORT
)
JANUARY 1 to DECEMBEF 31, 1985 Prepareci by LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY and TELEDYNE ISOTOPES April 15, 1986 I
)
I
I TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGF EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
I.
THE PROGRAM................................................
4 A.
Objectives............................................
5 B.
Sample Co11ection.....................................
5 1.
Aquatic Environment..............................
5 2.
Atmospheric Environment..........................
6 3.
Terrestrial Environment..........................
7 4.
D i r ec t Ra d i a t i on................................. 7 C.
Quality Assurance.....................................
7 1.
Teledyne Isotopes................................
7 2.
Long Island Lighting Company.....................
8 D.
Data Interpretation....................................o 1.
General..........................................
9 2.
Gamma Isotopic..................................
10 E.
Dose Assessment......................................
10
(
F.
Program Summary......................................
11 II.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION....................................
15 A.
Aquatic Environment..................................
16 1.
Surface Water...................................
16 2.
Fish............................................
16 Invertebrates...................................
17 4.
Aquatic P1 ants..................................
17 5.
Sediment........................................
17
.I O
1 i
l l
1
I TABLE OF CONTENTS PA3E E.
Atmospheric Environment..............................
19 1.
Airborne Particulates...........................
18 2.
Airborne Iodine.................................
22 3.
Noble Gas.......................................
22 C.
Terrestrial Envircnment..............................
22 1.
Mi1k............................................
22 n
2.
Potable Water...................................
22
,c.
Game.............................................m, 4.
Food Products...................................
23 5.
Precipitation...................................
23 D.
Direct Radiation.....................................
23 E.
Dose Assessment......................................
24 III.
CONCLUSIONF..............................................
26 IV.
REFERENCES................................................
29 APPENDIX A - Radiological Environmental Monitoring........ 32 Program Summary APPENDIX B - Sample Designation and Sampling Locations.... 37 APPENDIX C - Data Tab 1es..................................
48 APPENDIX D - Analytical Procedures Synopsis...............
94 APPENDIX E - Summary of EPA Interlaboratory Comparisons... 96 APPENDIX F - REMP Sampling and Analytical Exceptions..... 100 APPENDIX G - SNPS Land Use Surveys.......................
112 AFPENDIX H - 1983/1984 Errata............................
118 I
t I
11
I LIST OF TABLES NO.
TITLE FAGE 1.
Synopsis of the Shorcham Nuclear Power Station..............
13 Operational Radiological Environmental Moni toring Prograra for the period January 1 through December 31, 1985 2.
Summary of Dose Determination for 1985......................
25 3.
Comparison of 1985 Positive Results with....................
28 Fre-operational Data Appendix B - Sampl e Desionati on and Samplino Location B-1 Sample Location...............................................
41 B-2 Airborne Particulates and Airborne Iodine Monitoring..........
43 Stations Required by SNPS Technical Specifications I.
B-3 Waterborne Monitoring Stations Required by SNPS...............
43 Technical Specifications B-4 Ingestion Monitoring Stations Required by SNPS................
43 Technical Specifications D-5 Direct Radiation Monitoring Required by SNPS..................
44 Technical Specifications Appendix C - Data Tables Acuatic Environment C-1 Concentrations of Tritium, Strontium-89, Strontium-90....... 49 and Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples C-2 Concentrations of Strontium-89, Strontium-90 and Gamna......
50 Emitters in Fish Samples C-3 Concentrations of Strontium-89, Strontium-90 and Gamma......
51 Emitters in Invertebrate Samples C-4 Concentrations of Strontium-89, Strontium-90 and Gamma......
52 Emitters in Aquatic Plant Samples C-5 Concentrations of Strontium-89, Strontium-90 and Gamma......
53 Emitters in Sediment Samples iii
LIST OF TABLES (CONT'D)
Atmospheric Environment C-6 Concentrations of Gross Beta Emitters in Airborne...........
54 Particulate Samples C-7 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Quarterly...............
60 Airborne Particulate Samples C-8 Concentrations of Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in......... 62 Quarterly Composites of Airborne Particulate Samples C-9 Concentrat2ons of Iodine-131 in Air Cartridge Samples.......
63 Terrestrial Environment C-10 Concentrations of Tritium, Gross Beta and Gamma Emitters.... 67 in Precipitation C-11 Concentrations of Iodine-131 in Milk Samples................
68 C-12 Concentrations of Strontium-89, 90 and Gamma................
69 Emi tters in Milk Samples I
C-13 Concentrations of Tritium, Iodine-131 and Gamma Emitters.... 72 In Potable Water Samples C-14 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Game Samples............
73 C-15 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Food Product Samples.... 74 DIRECT RADIATION C-16 Direct Radiation Measurements - Quarterly TLD Results.......
76 C-17 Direct Radiation Measurements - Monthly TLD Results.........
78 NOBLE GAS C-18 Noble Gas Concentrations of Krypton-85 and Xenon-133........
80 in Air Samples LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD)
C-19 Typical LLDs Achieved for Gamma Spectrometry................
61 C-20 LLDs and Reporting Action Levels............................
82 iv
l m
LIST OF TABLES (CONT'0)
Appendi: G - SNPS Land Use Surveys G-1 REMP 1985 Land Use Census Nearest MiIL Animal................
115 G-2 REMD 1985 Land Use Census Nearest Garden.....................
116 G-3 REMP 1985 Land Use Census Nearest Residence..................
117 J
- I l
l I
l
\\
\\
l l
- I V
I I
LIST OF FIGURES NO.
PAGE 1.
Average Weekly Grcss Beta Results in Airborne Particulates.. 19 (January 1 through December 31, 1985) 2.
Comparison of Average Monthly Gross Beta Results in.........
20 Airborne Particulates (February 1977 - December 1985) 3.
Comparison of Average TLD Results...........................
21 (February 1977 - December 1985)
APPENDIX B - SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND LOCATIONS D-1 Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Site Location................
45 B-2 On Site Sampling Locations..................................
46 B-3 Off Site Sampling Locations.................................
47 I
I i
i I
vi
-_-.s m_..--
..--.a w
A.
_-.a--u__
...u,
-.-a_
1 i
1
'l l
I I
- I I
I i
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
i I
I I
I 1
I EXECUTIVE SUMM/<RY The preoperational Radiclogical Environmental Mo,itoring Program (REMP) for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (SNPS) began in Feb usry 1977 and continued through 1984.
The Lor.g Isl and Lighting
- Compen, received a Icw power oper a ti r g license for Shoreham on Decemoer 7
1984, and began loading fuel on December 21, 1784.
Ir i ttel criticality occurred on February 15, 1985.
This report deta.!s :ne first year of low power testing, during whic, time the rea: tor we licensed to operate at core power levels not in e> Cess of 121.E VVt (5%).
The objective of the operatior>ai REM 3
.s te ide,tify ard measu e p:ent related radioactivity in the en/ironmen: for the calculaticn of the I
pctential dose to the surrounding poptlation.
The operational phase utilizes the preoperational baseline data tc identify plant cor.t r i b uted r acii at i or and to evaluate the possible effects of I
radioactise plant cffluent on the environment.
Designed to Comply with the Plant'c Technica! 3pecificatiors and NRC Regulatory Eui den, the REMP data is acquired by sampling media in the envircnment which are then a,alyzed for ary radiation present.
Media sampled within the aquatic environment included surface
- water, algae, fish, invertebrates (clams, lobsters, etc.) and sedinent.
The atmospheric environment was sampled zor airborne particulates, airborne iodine and ncble gases.
Milk, potable water, precipitaticn, game and food products wer e obtained from the terrestrial environment.
Direct radiation was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLLs).
I Radioactivity in environmental mecia vari es frem sample to sanple as well as geographically; therefo e, a number of sampl2ng locations fa-each medium were selected using available meteorolcgical, land and water use data.
Sampling locations are designated as either indicator I
or control locations.
The indicator locations are placed close enoaM to Shoreham so that plant contributed radioactivity will be at its highest concentration.
The control sample locations are placed so that they will be beyond measurable influence of Ghoreham and any other nuclear facility.
A number of radioanalyces were perforned or. each mediun samaled.
A1.
samples did not undergo all types of radicanal)ses; only thos:
analyses apprcpriate for the particular nedium were perfarned.
The analyses included ganma upectrometry, str an tium-89 and
-90, I
icdine-131, tr i t i un:, gross beta radiation, direct radiation and n oble gaues.
REMS samples collected during 1905 e: h a bi t ed r.ormal concentrations of background radioactivity that have been obcerved in the Shoreham area over the past seven years.
I
Dose calculations for the SNPS environs were performed utilizirg positive concentrations of radioactivity detected in the samples collected.
In all cases the calculated doses were similar to the background doses calculated for the previous years, with the createst contribution attributed to direct radiation f rom cosmic and terr ect: al sources.
Section I of the report describes Shoreham's REMP.
Sections II ar. d III contain the results, discussion and ccnclusions of the 1985 effort.
Appendix A provides a summary of the analytical results.
Appendi: B details the sampling locations.
Appendix C contains the data tables for 1985 samples.
Analytical Procedures are summarized in Appendi:. D.
The results of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Interlaboratory Comparison Prcgram are presented in Appendix E.
Appendix F describes the sampling and analytical exceptions that occurred in 1985.
The Land Use Surveys are reported in Appendix G.
Appendix H presents errata from the 1983 and 1984 FEMF Annual Reports.
lI i
l l
3 i
+a
._._-a,w--_s.
m
-am
-.-a-a
--a.
1 2
l l
i i
l l
I i
I.
THE PROGRAM t
4 l
l I
e i
j l
l l
I i
l i
I I
l 4
I.
THE PROGRAM The Shoreham fluclear Power Station's (ENFS) Radiological Enviro 7mentel Monitoring Program (REMP) is performed in compliance with NFC regulations, licensing commitments, Frogram technical / legal r equ i r ement s and the Plant's Technical Specifications.
The REMP wan de. eloped in general accordance with the NRC Radiological Assessmer.t Eranch Technical Position (BTP) Rev.
1, Nov. 1079 (transmitted to all Operating License Applicants by Steven A.
- Varga, Actir.g Assistant Director for Light Wate-Reactors. Di vi si on of Proj ect Managemen', on December 21, 1979); LILCO'c Final Safety Analysis Report (FEAR) 11.6, Environmental Repo-t (ER) 6.1.5 and Technical Specifications
- Sectic, 3/4 12.
All camples were collected by personnel of the Long Islend Lighting Company (Environmental Engineering and S NDE.
Operat:ons Departments) or EA Engineering Science and Technology Inc.
(f orme.l l y Ecolog2 cal Analysts).
A syncpsis of the sampling program can be fcurc in Table 1.
A map and description of sempling locations appea-in Appendiy B.
More detailed information concerning sample locatien a,d collection is available in the Procedure Manual.
Radiolooice!
Environmental Monitorinc Procram for the Shoreham Nuclear Pnwer Station, Rev.
2, October 1,
1984.
During 1965 sample analyses were perf ormed by Teledyne Isotopes (TI) of Westwood, New Jersey (referred to throughout the text as "the laboratory") under ccntract to LILCO.
A summary of analytical results appears in Appendix A and individual analysis results in Appendix C.
A.
Objectives The objectives of the operational radiological environmental monitoring program are:
1.
Identify and measure plant related radioactivity in the environment for the calculation of the potenti al dose to the population.
2.
Identify excessive radionuclide concentrations of limited duration so that appropriate action may be taken.
3.
Determine the long term variation in radionuclide concentrations or, 4.
Establish that the levels are insignificant.
5.
Determine the effects of plant effluent on the ensirorment.
6.
Comply wi th regulatory requi rements end provide records to document compliance.
5
B.
Sample Collection 1.
Aquatic Environment The aquatic environment at the SNPS site was examined by analyzing samples of surface water, fish, invertebrates, agaatic plants and sediment.
Surface water samples were taken at sin locations in May and October using a Niskin Bottle.
The samples were placed in new polethylene bottles f ollowing three rinses with the sample medium prior to collection.
Samples of Winter Flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, Windowpane, Sc opht h al mus aauesus, Sea Robin, Prionotus spp, Little Skate, Raja
- erinacea, Blackfish, Tautoo onitis and Summer Flounder, Paralichthys dentatus were taken by trawl, sealed in plastic bags, frozen, and I
shipped to the laboratory for analysis.
Invertebrate samples of American Lobster, Homarus amer ic anus, Squid, Lolico pealeii and Channeled Whelk, Busvcon canaliculate were collected by trawl.
Channeled whelk were also collected using pots.
These invertebrate samples were sealed in plastic bags, frozen and shipped to the laboratory fer analysis.
Blue Mussels Mytilus edulis were collected by hand along jetties and soft-shell clams, Mya arenaria from Wading River were shelled and sealed in plastic bags, frozen and shipped to the laboratory.
Aquatic plants. Focus sp.,
lJ1 v a lacatuca, Enteromorpha sp.,
Codium sp.,
amcng others were collected while trawling for the fish samples and from along the shoreline, then sealed in plastic bags, refrigerated and shipped.
Deep water sediment was collected using a Smi th-MacIntyre bottom sampler, sealed in plastic bags, frozen and shipped.
Beach sediment samples were also collected, sealed in plastic bags, froren and shipped to the laboratory.
2.
Atmospheric Environment The atmospheric environment was examined by analyzing airborne I
particulates collected on Gelman Type A/E filters using low volume air sampicrs (approximately 1 cfm).
Airborne iodine was collected by absorption on triethylenediamine (TEDA) impregnated charcoal cartridges which were connected in series behind the airborne particulate filters.
The samplers used were equipped with a vacuum recorder for sample volume correction and to indicate sample validity and maintenance problems when they occurred.
Should the sampler lose vacuum due to a leak the vacuum level reading will drop to zero.
Since this may occur without a corresponding loss of electric supply the exact time of the maintenance problem will be evident on the recorder chart.
Sample volumes were measured using dry gas meters and corrected for differences between the actual pressure that the volume meter sees and the average atmospheric pressure.
Sample volumet ar e corrected to standard pressure using average weekly barometri:
6 i
pressure (measured at Envircnmental Engineering Departmart, Mel vi l l e) and air sampler vacuun reacings.
Time tot al i: ers indicate the duration of t i r. e t he sample was taken.
Air samples were collected weetly at St. Joseph's Villa a nt' analyred for Noble Gases, Krypton-E5 and Xenon-133.
The s ampl es were ccliected using a modified law pressu e air compresscr.
An interim holding tank is evacuated to 20" Hg.
Outside a.~. r is drawn into the interim helder anc then transferred to a semple tank for transport to the laboratory fo-anal ys i s.
3.
Terrestrial Environment The terrestrial environment was examined t y anal yzing semples cf milk, precipitation, potable wate, game, ar.d focd prcducts.
When available, milk sarples were collected f r om fcur locatione monthly, except during the pasture season (Vai through Octcher) when the saapling was increased to twice a month.
Milk samples were shipped on ice with Sodium Ei sul f i te (NaHSC3) preser vat i ve added.
Precipitation was collected at two l ocations weakly.
In order to ensure sufficient sample volume weekly precipitaticn samples were combined for a monthly sample composite.
Potable water was collected quarterly from three well locations.
Game samples (squirrel, Sciurus carolinens2s, and raccoon, Procyon lotor) were elso obtair.ed semiannually from on site 1ccations, frozen, sealed in plastic bags and then shipped.
Food products consisting of vegetables and frtit were cellected frcm area farm s t ar:d s and shipped fresh to the, laboratory.
4.
Direct Fadiation Direct radiation levels in the environs were measured with ene gy conpensated Calcium Sulfate (CaSO4: Dy) TLDs, each containinq fou-separate readout areas.
The TLDs are annealed by LILCO prior to placement in the field.
Two TLDs were placed at 36 locations and enchanged on a monthly and quarterly cycle.
The units are then packaged and shipped to the laboratory for analysis.
C.
Dual i ty Assurance 1.
Teledyne Isotopes Teledyne Isotopes (TI) has an entensive quality ausurance pr og-am designed to ensure the precision and accuracy of the date generated.
Interlaboratory comparison programs are conducced with the Envircnmental Prctection Agency (EPA 3 The results of I
the EPA analyses are listed in Appendix E.
Par ti ci pati on in EPA intercomparisons permits estimation of bias in TI results from the deviation from the "known" value given or by comparison witn means of all participants.
The TI Quality Assurance Progran for Radiological Monitoring is described in various TI publ ic att or s (15, 16, 17).
Approximately 10 percent of TI's total analytical effert is spent on quality control including process quality 7
I control, instrument quality control, intra and interlebo-ator" cross-check, and comprehensive data resiew.
In addition.
LILCC I
specifically requires that ten percent of its analyses be duplicated for further quality ccntrol cross check.
2.
Long Island Lighting Cor.pany a.
Nuclear Review Bca-d (NRB) Autit The annual EEMP NFB audit was cor.duc ted or. October 16. 17 and 18, 1985.
This year's audit focuseJ on internal LILCD REMP activities in Environmental and Nacitar Engineering, Nuclear Operations Support and Shorehua Operations Departments.
LIL2O subccntractors were-audi ted separately by LILCO's Quality Assurance (OA) Department.
The Pr ograc areas audited were:
Quality Assuran e, Comp l i ar.c e,
Maintenance, Calibration and Standardization.
Audit Report NK-85-01 was issued on October 30 listing five (5) findings.
No SNFS Technics.1 Specification violations were cited in these findings.
As of December 31, correttive action for each of these findings had been completed and reported to LILCO's OA Department.
b.
LILCO Ouality Assurance Audits 1.
Field Audit The REMF sampling effort has been audited by LILCO's OA Department since the beginning of the Prcgran.
The 1985 audits were conducted on January 15 'Airbor,e Particulate / Iodine), March 18 (Potable Water), March 19 (Airborne Particulate / Iodine),
June 25 (Airborne Particulate / Iodine), September 25 (Milt),
0:tober 30 (Aquatic) and December 23 (Airborne Particulate /
Iodi r.e).
Finding 4.1 of audit FA-1751 noted a need to revise existing SNPS procedures to bette-define REMo Potable I
Water collection requirements.
The sampling protectres have been revised and the finding was closed on Jantary 6,
1986.
The only other finding for 1985 was cited in FA-1823 requiring a
descriptior of new sampling locations 8F2, 11C1 end 12C1 to be listed in the annual repo-t.
These location descriptions are listed in Ap p en d i '< B of this report.
2.
Environmental Radi ol ogi cal Laboratory Audit As with the REMo field sampling, the environmental radiological laboratory performing REMP radioanalyses has been audited annually since the start of 8
I s
monitoring.
The laboratory utilized daring
- 1735, Teledyne Isotopes, was audited on Novenber 12-14, 19E5.
The audit team was comprized of representatives fr:m Ovality Assurance, Environmental and Nuclear Engineering Dep ar t a.en t s.
The 1985 audit. reviewed Teled yne's exi sting DA program for compliance with Federal regulations and LILCO specifications.
This years' audit identified five (5) findings requiring corrective action by Teledyne.
Tel e d yr.e responded to these findings on December 13, 1985.
The corrective and proposed preventive actions suggested by Teledyne have been tentatively accepted by
- LILCO, pending verification scheduled for June 1986.
D.
Data Interpretation 1.
General The analytical data generated during the progrum are routinely evaluated by the TI project leader who is the liason witt Long Island Lighting Company's Environmental and Nuclear Engineering Departments.
Several factors are inportant in the interpretation of the data.
These factors are discussed here to avoid repetition in sections that follow.
Within the data tables (Appendir C) an approximate 95 percent (12 sigma) confidence interval is supplied for those data points above the lower limit of detection (LLD).
These intervals represent the range of values into which 95 percent of repeated analyses of the same sample would fall.
Tables C-19 and C-20 present typical and required LLD's, respectively.
Results for each type of sample were grouped according to the I
analysis performed.
Means and standard deviations of these results are calculated when applicable.
The calculated stardard deviations of grouped data represent sample rather than analytical variability.
For these calcul ations any values below LLD are considered to be at the LLD.
As a result, the means are biased high and the standard deviations are biased low.
When a
group of data is composed of mainly LLD values (>50%),
averages are not calculated.
Grab sampling is a useful and acceptable procedure for taking environmental samples of a medium in which the concentration of radionuclides is enpected to vary minimally with time or where intermittent sampling is deemed sufficient to establish the radiological characteristics of the medium.
This
- method, I
however, is only representative of the sampled medium for that specific location and instant of time.
As a result, variation of radionuclide concentrations in the samples will normally occu.
Since these variations will tend to counterbalance one
- another, the entraction of averages based upon repetitive grab samples is valid.
l 9
I
2.
Gamma Isotopic Analyses SNPS Technical Specifications Table 3.12.1-1 requires that analyses be performed on all media for gamma emitting radionuclides which may be attributable to the effluents f r on. the plant.
These analyses are in addition to requirements for specific gamma emitters such as I-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ea-140, Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Ir-95 and Nb-95.
Industry experience suggests that these are the most likel y radionuclides to find their way into the environment from a BWR nucl ear power plant.
Gamma spectroscopy is expected to identify most other nuclides which may be discharged when the LLD's for specifiec gamma emitters are met by this technique.
Tables 3.1 and 3.2 of the Shoreham Final Environmental Statement list the calculated liquid and gaseous effluents by radionuclide in curies per year.
These release rates assume normal operation of the
- plant, including anticipated operational occurrences.
Those nuclides listed in Tables 3.1 and 3.2 which are not routinely observable by gamma spectroscopy and which are not specifically analyzed in other ways, fall into two categories:
1.
Those radionuclides with half-lives on the order of hours or minutes which cannot accumulate appreciably in the environment (Na-24, Cu-64, Zn-69m, 2n-69, Sr-91, Y-91m, Y-92, Y-93, Tc-79m, Rh-103m, Rh-105, Rh-106, Te-129, Te-131m, Te-131, I-132, I-135, Ba-137m, Pr-143, Ce-143, Pr-144 and W-187).
2.
Those radionuclides with no gammas (P-32, Fe-55), those with a trivial percentage of their transitions going by gamma emission I
(Y-91), or those with their primary gamma occurring at such a low energy and at such low abundance that it is not routinely observable in the presense of other gamma activity (Nd-147).
I With only 10pCi of Nd-147 calculated to be released per year in Shoreham's liquid effluents, the nuclide cannot be an impcrtant contributor to dose.
E.
Dose Assessment In order to assess the total dose an individual may receive from the Shoreham environmental releases, appropriate environmental samples, located along critical effluent pathways, are analyzed for the presence and total activity of specific radionuclides.
The exposure an individual may receive is then approximated by quantitative analysis of these radionuclide concentrations in air, water, milk, and food samples. as well as due to direct radiation exposure.
It is also possible to estimate the dose rate to a particular internal body organ I
when the average radionuclides concentrations in a particular environmental medium are known.
10
Radionuclides may enter the body through ingestion of water and milk, inhalation of and immersion in air, submersion in water, or consumption of food.
- Thus, in order for the REMP to provide an estimate of the total radiation dose, a radionuclide intate is determined for each pathway.
The methodclogy for determining doses is similar for all pathweys.
Labcratory analyses from the REMP for each sample type are ccmpiled.
Data from all locations taken on the same date are averaged tc obtair the most reliable approximation of the radioactivity concentration on that date.
The averages of all dates are then taken to provide the best approximation of radioactivity concentrations for the year.
When an average value has been obtained which represents a sample medium or an exposure pathway, it can then be used to calculate the dose for the year.
Additional information, such as the quantity of fisn, mill, water, meat, vegetables, etc., consumed per year by the maximum indavidual is also needed to calculate the total dose (19).
The dose due to direct radi ati on exposure is monitored by TLDs.
The laboratory results for TLD's are expressed in dose u,its directly ano do not require any additional calculations.
I The dose to the total body or to a-apecific organ is then calculated by the product of the radionuclide specific dose conversion facto-for its applicable exposure pathway, the environmental sample radionuclide concentration, and the ingestion or inhalation rate cf the sample or medium of interest.
For example, the following general equatior expresses this principle:
Dose
= Concentration x Quantity ingested x Dose factor (mrem /yr) per sample per year The sample concentration is typically expressed in pCi/MIor pCi/kg.
For the ingestion pathway, thq quantity ingested or consumed per year is expressed in kg/ year or 4/ year.
Finally, the dose conversion factor is expressed in terms of mrem /pCi ingested or inhaled.
F.
Procram Summary Table I summari:es information on the REMP as performed during the period of this report January 1 through December 31, 1985.
Dur2nc this reporting period 3186 anal yses were pe-formed on 2523 environmental samples.
Appendix A summarizes the analytical results obtained from the SNPS REMP.
The format used is similar to that recommended in NRC Radi ol ogi cal Assessment BTP, Rev. 1 Nov-1979.
Appendix B describes the sample coding system, which specifier sanple type and relative locations at a glance.
In addition, pertinent information on individual sampling locations, and maps which shew their geographic location, are included.
Appendix C presents the analytical results of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station's 11
Radiological En vi r onmen t al Monitoring Program for the peri od January 1 through December 31, 1935.
Appendix D contains a synopsi s of the analytical procedures used in the REMP.
Results of the EFA interlaboratory comparison program can be found in Appendix E.
Appendix F lists the program exceptions for 1985.
Appendix G reports the land use surveys performed by LILCO's Er vircnmental Engineering Department during 1985 in the vicinity of the SNPS.
Errata for the i
1983 and 1984 reports can be found in Appendix H.
l I l
l l
l l I 12
M M
M TABLE 1 SYNOPSIS OF THE SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY I THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1985 i
SAMPLE SAMPLING NUMBER ANALY515 NUMBER TYPE FREQUENCY LOCATIONS COLLECTED ANALYSIS FREQUENCY DERFORMED Aquatic Environment Surface Water Sealannual 6
12 H-3 Semiannual 12 Gamma Semiannual 12 Sr-89 Semiannual 12 Sr-90 Semiannual 12 Fish Semiannual 3
30 Gamma Semiannual 30 Sr-89 Semiannual 30
$r-90 Sealannual 30 invertebrates Semlannual 6
22 Gamma Sealannual 22 Sr-89 5emiannual 22 w
Sr-90 Semlannual 22 Aquatic Plants Sealannual 6
12 Gamma Sealannual 12 Sr-89 Sestannual 12 Sr-90 Semi annua l 12 Sediment -- Beach Sem1 annual 4
4 Gamma Semiannual 4
Sr-89 Sealannual 4
Sr-90 Semiannual 4
Sediment -- Offshore Semlannual 5
10 Gamma Semlannual 10 Sr-89 5emlannual 10 Sr-90 Semlannual to Atmospheric Environment Airborne Particulates Weekly 16 829 Gross Beta Weekly 829 Gamma Quarterly Composite 64 Sr-89 Quarterly Composite b4 Sr-90 Quarterly Composite 64 Airborne lodine Weekly 16 829 l-131 Weekly 829 Noble Gas Weekly 1
48 Kr-85 Weekly 41 Xe-133 Weekly 48
M M
M M
M.
-e i
i l
l l
i TABLE I (Cont.)
SYNOPSIS OF THE SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY l THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1985 SAMPLE SAMPLING NUMBEN ANALYSIS NUMBER TYPE FREQUENCY LOCATIONS COLLECTED ANALY$l$
FREQUENCY PERFONMED Terrestrial Environment Milk Biweekly (1) 6 78 I-131 Btweekly 18 Gamma Btweekly 78 Sr-89 Monthly 51 Sr-90 Monthly 51 N
Potable Water Quarterly 3
12 Gamma Quarterly 12 1-131 Quarterly 12 H-3 Quarterly 12 Precipitation Monthly 2
24 Gamma Monthly 14 H-3 Monthly 24 Gr-Beta Monthly 14 Game Sealannual 5
4 Gamma Sealannual 4
Food Products Annual 6
33 Gamma Annual 33 Direct Radiation TLDs Quarterly 36 144 Gamma Dose Quarterly 144 Monthly 36 432 Gamma Dose Monthly 432 (1) Milk is collected btweekly during the pasture season and monthly during the nongrazing season.
\\
1 I
l II.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS I
'l I
I 15 I
II.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The analytical results for the reporting period of January 1 through December 31, 1985 have been divided into four categories:
- aquatic, atmospheric, terrestrial, and direct radiation.
The individual samples and analyses within each category display the uni que radiological characteristics of that type of environment.
Analytical results of the REMP are summarized in Appendix A.
The data for individual analyses are presented in Appendix C.
A.
Aauatic Environment The aquatic environment in the vicinity of SNPS consists primarily of Long Island Sound.
The radiological characteristics were studied by analyzing samples of surface water, Winter Flounder, Windowpane, Sea Robin, Little Skate, Blackfish, Summer Flounder, American
- Lobster, Squid, Channeled Whelk, Blue Mussels, Soft Shell Clams, aquatic plants I
and sediment collected by Environmental Engineering and EA Engineering Science and Technology Inc.
1.
Surface Water (Table C-1)
Semiannual surface water samples were taken at six locations and were analyzed for tritium, gamma emitters and strontium-89 and strontium-90.
Four surface water samples analyzed for tritium showed detectable levels between 180 and 350 pCi/
with an average of 238 pCi/
The other eight samples were below the lower limit of detection.
This is consistent with tritium concentrations observed in surface water during 1983 and 1984, the pre-operational period.
Naturally occuring Potassium-40 was measured in ten of the samples with an average of 254 pCi/
and a range between 134 and 329 pCi/
No other gamma activity above the detectable levels was measured in the twelve surface water samples as analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.
Surface water samples were also analyzed for strontium-89 and strontium-90.
Neither nuclide was observed within the limits of detection.
LILCO's REMP Ouality Assurance Laboratory, Clean Harbors of
- Natick, Inc., reported an I-131 result of
.4 pCi/
i.1 (2T) for I
a sample taken at location 3C1 on 11-14-85.
A reanalysis showed
.3 pCi/
.2 (2T).
The required LLD is.5 pCi/
Teledyne Isotopes reported an I-131 concentration of
<.2 pCi/
for the same sample location and date.
2.
Fish (Table C-2)
Thirty fish samples were collected at three locations and the edible portions analyzed for gamma emitters.
Gamma spectrometry 16 I
I showed pctassium-40 present in all samples with an aver age concentration of 3529 pCi/kg wet and a range between 2380 and 4540 pC1/kg wet.
Cesium-137 was c tected in ni e e samples with ar.
average activity of 11.4 pCi/kg we : and a range between 7.7 and I
17.4 pCi/kg wet.
These activities are less than those rep or ted in 1983 and 1984, during the pre-operational period.
Strontium-89 and str or.ti um-70 ar al yses were also performec~
on these samples.
No radioactivity above the limits cf detectier was observed for these isotopes.
I 3.
Invertebrates (Table C-3)
Twenty-five invertebrate samples. comprised of soft shell clams, I
mussels, lobsters, squid, and whelks, were collected at six locations and analyzed for gamma emi tter s, strentium-59 and strontium-90.
Gamma spectrometry showed detectable levels of potassium-40 in 22 samples, ranging from 2190 to 8620 pCi/kg wet with an average activity of 3069 pCi/kg wet.
Naturally occuring Bery11ium-7 was measured in two samples ranging from 59.9 to 74.2 pCi/kg wet with an average activity of 67.1 pCi/kg wet.
Neither strontium-89 nor strontium-90 was observed within the limits of detection.
4.
Aquatic Plants (Table C-4)
Marine algae, collected at five locations (ten samples) in Long I
Island Sound and at one location in Wading River Marsh (two analyzed for gamma emitters and strontium-89 and samples), were strontium-90.
Gamma spectrometry of these samples showed detectable potassium-40 in all samples ranging from 354C to 38600 pCi/kg dry with an average of 18965 pCi/kg dry.
Cosmogenically produced bery11ium-7 was measured in eight of the samples ranging from 280 to 1700 pCi/kg dry with a average activity of 995 pCi/kg I
dry.
Cesium-137 was measured in two samples with an average activity of 43.9 pCi/kg dry.
Naturally occuring thorium-228 was-measured in eight samples with an average activity of 294 pCi/kg I
dry.
Radium-226 was measured in three samples with an average activity of 944 pCi/kg dry.
Strontium-90 was measured in three samples with an average activity of 14.9 pCi/kg dry ranging fron 6.8 to 27 pCi/kg dry.
The measured activities for Strontium-90 and Cesium-137 are consistent with those reported during the pre-operational period I
of 1983-1984.
5.
Sediment (Table C-5)
Ten sediment samples were collected in May, June and November at five offshore locations and anal yzed f or gamma emitters and strontium-E9 and strontium-90.
Gamma spectrometry showed I
detectable levels of potassium-40 in all sanples ranging from 2000 to 6860 pCi/kg dry with an average activity of 3273 pCi/kg dry.
Naturally occurring radium-226 was observed in four samples 17
with an average activity of 1057 pCi/kg dry and a range of 947 tc 1260 pCi/kg dry.
Thorium-228, also naturally occurring, was measured in all samples within the range of 174 to 912 pCi/kg dry with an average activity of 357 pCi/kg dry.
Cesium-137 was measured in one sample at an activity of 30.4 pCi/kg dry, which is within the range of activities reported during the 1987-1984 pre-operational period.
All other gamma emitters, were below the lower limit of detection.
No strontium-89 or strontium-90 was detected in these samples.
Four beach sediment samples were collected and analyzed for strontium-89 and strontium-90 and gamma emitters.
No strontium was detected.
All samples had measurable activities of twc naturally occurring isotopes:
potassium-40 and thorium-223 with average activities of 2320 pCi/kg dry ar.d 212 pCi/kg
- dry, respectively.
One sample had measurable radi um-226 wi th an activity of 314 pCi/kg dry.
All other gamma emitters were bel ew the lower limit of detection.
B.
Atmospheric Environment The atmospheric environment in the vicinity of the SNFS was examined by analyzing samples of airborne particulates and airborne iodine at 16 sampling locations.
TEDA-impregnated charcoal cartridges used to collect airborne iodine were collected weekly and anal yzed by gamma spectrometry for iodine-131.
Airborne particulates were collected weekly and analyzed for beta emitters.
Quarterly composites from each station were analyzed for gamma emitters and radiostrontium.
1.
Airborne Particulates (Tables C-6, C-7 and C-8)
Beta-emitter concentrations ranged from 0.006 to 0.047 pCi/m3 with an annual average for the 16 sampling locations of 0.017 pCi /m (Table C-6).
Of the 827 measurements, five were below the 3
detection limit, nominally 0.004 pCi/m3 Figure 1 shows the I
average weekly gross beta fluctuations in airborne particulates from all stations for 1985.
Figure 2 represents the average monthly gross beta results in airborne particulates from January 1, 1977 through December 31, 1985.
Results of gamma spectrometry (Table C-7) showed detectable levels of naturally occurring beryllium-7 in all 64 samples.
The l
(
average bery11ium-7 activity in the quarterly analyses was 0.0905 i
pCi/m3 with a range between 0.062 and 0.120 pCi/m3 Naturally occurring potassium-40 was observed thirteen times.
The potassium-40 had an average activity of 0.016 pCi/ms.
All other l
gamma emitters were below the lower limit of detection.
The radiostrontium analyses (Table C-8) on the 64 quarterly t
composites showed no detectable levels of strontium-89 or strontium-90.
One background location showed a positive Sr-93 result of 4.4 x 104 pCi/m3 All other locations showed no detectable levels of Strontium-90.
The LLD for Strontium-90 is 1 x
10-* pCi/m3 and the reporting level i*s
.1 pCi/m3 18
C E
D i__f i'
-. rj g
l-
_i V
O N
(?.
_ i_.
- i t[
,- _'j T
S E,
C O
T 7, '-
i4 A
L U
L_.-
C
.t*!_
I
.!;g P
I E
T S
R A
l
. E_
!!-'l3
'I t'_.
l P
R G
I N
U A
A I,
=
_ i 1_
7 U
ylI i'j, S
U5 L
T L
J@
S E
h._
R j jr
. p
,l gI T :,i,'
9 d_l
.l.
A N
J1 T
U 1
E B
E S
U L
'fr{
l
!! qg pif_
R
]
S J
G Y
O I
R A
F G
M li
-li Y
L K
J.
E R
. ~
E P
W
. ~
A E
G
_ I -.
l i-
,g s
t,,
A R
R E
A V
M A
,i u. '
i 4
L.l.
jL h B
E F
_. I t[
i i' a __
N V
J A
. _. _. ~
.._ ~.
0 O
0 o
0 5
1 0
O 0
s 2
0 S
1 2
OOO } r aUs oa
_ o t
m FIGURE 2 COMPARISON OF AVERAGE MONTHLY GROSS BETA RESULTS IN AIR PARTICULATES 10
_i_.
i..__
i.
[
...g _........ -._.
.g
.._._.j 500 -- - - -
__.I____.._.
t
]
_{
. i_
...__..__.._l
_ _ _. _i.
l l
l 1
I 9
l I
i i
i 200
_ _..,,_ _ _,,, j,,
y, _,,_ --
, {,,_,,_, __,,, 7
._...q_...__.._.__...
_ _...j_
' - ' - ' ' ' ~
- p. _
g
_____.q.....___..T'--~~-
o r--
o go _..,
__j_
g___.
o s
._...__4.._.._.__
i a
's i
_. 1.
. _. _. _ _f
__.g._
I
_.. _ _.. _.. j.....
u
)
____}..__..
_,_ j..___
_7
.. [._...
l i
on l
l i
I l
I i
i 20
___J._....__.
~ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ __,._..__..__.t_.___._._.3.._...___..j g,_..
.._._..._..j..,_._.
5
- k --- - ----
- - -- - h 4--------,
,_._._______,..._.._.__y._.._...q._..._..
l.
__ j _ _
._.___..L_..
( e f; _ _ _ _... _ _.
!. _ _ __.-. _ _ ]
.._. _. _ _ p _ _
I (a)
(b) c (d) p,(a) l a
a o
a l
l l
l i
i 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984' 19H5
( a )1977 Atmospheric Weapons. test - 09f'4 7
(b)
Atmospheric Weapons Test - 03/
(c)
Three Mile Island - 03/14 (d)
Mount St. Helens First Major Eruption - 05/18 (e)
Atmospheric Weapons Test - 10/16
EIER Figuro 3 COMPARISON OF AVERAGE TLD RESULTS ( 1977 -- 1985 )
10 I
l I
i i
l g
._..._....g.
..J.
8 I
e t
i I
l j
l U
t l
t i.
7
--T-~-----
H iO 6
3 1
~
9.
I y
o.
E N
'li r _. _ _. --
4 3
2 (a)
(b)
(c)
(d) (e; 2
d I
ib i
b db O
1977 1978 1979 1990 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 (a)
Atmospheric Weapons Test - 09/17 (b)
Atmospheric Weapons Test - 03/14
~
(c)
Three Mile Island - 03/14 (d)
Mount St. Helens First Major Eruption - 05/18 (e)
Atmospheric Weapons Test - 10/16
2.
Airborne Iodine (Table C-9)
Analytical results of airborne iodine-131 were all bel ow the lower limit of detecticn which ranged betaeen O.01 and 0.O?
pC:/m3 3.
IJcble Gas (Table C-18)
Air samples were collected weekly at St. Joseph's Villa and analyzed for krypton-85 and Xenon-133.
Xenon-133 was not found in any sample.
All samples had positive concentrations of Krypton-05 ranging from 24 pCi/m3 to 40 pCi/M3, with an average of 30 pCi/m3 C.
Terrestrial Envi ronment The terrestrial environment in the vicinity of the SNPS was examined by analyzing samples of game (ra cc ocn, squirrel
- rabbit was not available), milk, food products, beach sediment, rainwater and potable water.
Gamma spectrometry was performed on all the samples.
In addition, iodine-131 and strontium-99 and strontium-90 analyses were performed on the milk samples, while tritium and iodine-131 analyses were performed on the potable water samples and rainwater samples we e analyzed for gross beta and tritium.
1.
Milk (Tables C-11 and C-12)
All of the monthly and semimonthly cow and goat milk samples anal yzed f or iodine-131 were below the LLD, which ranged between O.2 and 0.5 pCi/2 Naturally occurring potassium-40 was observed in all the milk samples analyzed ranging from 907 to 2000 pCi/A for cow milk and 1550 to 2030 pCi44 for goat milk.
Cesium-137 was detected in two of the 32 goat mill: samples with an average of 5.2 pCi48.
Two of the 16 cow milk samples had measurable Cs-137 activity, with an average value of 4 pCiLL All other gamma emitters, as well as strontium-89 were below the detection limit.
All of the milk samples had measurable strontiun-90 activity rar.ging from 1.2 to 11 pCi/.E (average of 4.8 pCi46) for cow milk and f rom 0. 86 to 5. 3 pCi f6 (average of 2.5 pCi/8) for j
goat milk.
l l
The activities reported for Strontium-90 and Cesium-137 are consistent with those found in cow and goat milk during 1983 and i
1984 2.
Potable Water (Table C-13) l Tritium activi ty was observed in three of the 12 potable water l
samples with activities ranging from 150 to 290 pCi42 and an average activity of 200 pCi42 The other tritium analyses were below the lower limit of detection.
This is consistent with the results of 1983 and 1984.
No Iodine-131 was measured above the I
lower iimit of detection, which was between 0.1 and 0.3 pCi 44.
l All gamma emitters were below the lower limit of detection.
1 22 t
l l
3.
Game (Table C-14)
I Potassium-40 was observed in the four game samples with nearly the same activity level ranging f rom 2470 to 4340 pCi /kg wet.
However, cesium-137, the only other observed gamma emitter, was measured in greatly different activity levels in squirrels versus i
raccoons due presumably to differences in diets.
The squir rel samples had an average cesium-137 activity of 3245 pCi /Lg wet, while the two raccoon samples had an average cesium-137 activity of 1136 pCi/kg wet.
The Cesi um-137 acti vities found in squirrels and raccons are within the range of activities reported for squirrels and less than the range reported for raccons, during 1983 and 1984.
All other gamma emitters were below the lower limits of detection.
4.
Food Products (Table C-15)
Thirty-three human food products that were analyzed from local farms included tomatoes, potatoes, cabbage, lettuce,
- peaches, I
strawberries, carrots, and corn.
All samples contained potassium-40 at concentrations from 1080 to 3760 pCi/kg wet with an average of 2285 pCi/kg wet.
All other gamma emitters were below detection limits.
Although samples were analyzed for iodine-131 by the radiochemical procedure, none was detected.
The LLDs for iodine-131 an'alyses ranged between 4 and 10 pCi/kg wet.
5.
Precipitation (Table C-10)
Precipitation samples were collected at two stations during twelve months and analyzed for gross beta, tritium, and gamma emitters.
Gross beta activity was measured in 6 of the 14 samples with an average activity of 4.1 pCiff.
Due to insufficient sampler volume ten samples were not analyzed for gross beta (see notes on Table C-10).
Tritium was measured in 9 of 24 samples with an average activity of 199 pCi46, consistent with tritium activities reported in 1983 and 1984.
Naturally occurring bery11ium-7 was observed in one sample with an activity of 110 pCi/2.
All other gamma emitters were below the lower limit of detection.
D.
Direct Radiation (Tables C-16 and C-17)
D2 rect radiation measurements were tal:en monthly and quarterly at 36 locations using CaSO4: Dy thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).
TLDs were used to detect radiation levels due to terrestrial and cosmic gamma ray emitters near ground level in the vicinity of the Shoreham site.
Figure 3 presents a comparison of average TLD results from 1977 to 1985.
All TLD results presented in this report have been normalized to a standard month (30.4 days) to eliminate the apparent 23
differences caused by the variations in exposure period.
During this reporting period quarterly TLDs and monthly TLDs were collected.
The average of the quarterly exposures was 3.8 mR/ standard month and the average of the monthl y exposures was 4.0 mR/ standard month.
E.
Dose Assessment Table 2 summarizes the result of the dose assessment determinations based on 1985 data.
Initially all positive concentrations of radionuclides in samples, as shown in Hppendi:
A, were considered for inclusion in the dose calculation.
Since Be-7, K-40, Ra-226, and Th-228 are all naturally occurring isotopes and not likely to be produced as a result of the operaticn of Shoreham they were excluded.
VR-85 was also excludec as an individual contributor to dose since it is not inhaled o-ingested and is included in the direct radiation component.
The remaining positive isotopes, Cs-137, Sr-90 and H-3, could be produced as a
result of plant operation so they were included in the dose calculations, as was direct radiation.
It should be noted that H-3 also occurs naturally as a result of cosmic interactions, and Cs-137 and Sr-90 exist in the environment as a result of atmospheric weapons testing.
Shoreham can contribute to direct radiation by direct shine from the plant, which is negligible under normal cperating conditions, and by release of gaseous effluents.
This contribution should also be very small.
Comparison of the results of the dose assessment of 1985 with those of the preoperational years 1983 and 1984, show similar results for all three years.
All doses calculated in 1985 were less than those calculated in 1984.
The direct radiation dose in 1985 was less than in 1983.
Other doses calculated for 1983 were based on ingestion factors for the average individual, whereas the maximum individual factors were used in 1984 and 1985.
This makes e::act compari son of the renults difficult; hoaever, the dose is directly proportional to the activity in the medium which is shown in Table 3 for all three years.
In all cases the concentrations found in 1985 are consistent with those of 1983.
I It should be noted that Cs-137 found in squirrel and raccoon samples was considered as a dose contributor by using i ngesti on factors for meat.
This is highly conservative.
24
M M
M M
TABLE 2 SupmARY OF DOSE DETERMINATION FOR 1985 PATHWAY /
TOTAL BODY CRITICAL ORGAN MOST 5tN5tilvE RADIONUCL IDE ACTlvlTT QUANITITY 005E FACTOR 00$E FACTOR BODY DOSE (ORGAN DOSE AGE GROUP (5)
(mRee/pCl (maem/pCl (mace /yr.)
(amen /yr.)
INGESTfD)(2)
INGESTED)(2)
Direct Radiation (4)
TLD 3.9 d /std. no N/A N/A N/A 4b.8 mR/yr 46.8 d /yr (4)
Milk 33iiTt Cs-137 4.4 pct /s 310f/yr.
7.14 E-5 1.09 E-4 Ilver 9.74 E-2 1.49 E-1 liver Infant 330f/yr.
4.33 E-5 6.11 E-4 liver 6.29 E-2 8.87 E-! liver 5
Milk TiiTint Sr-90 2.1 pct /f 330f/yr.
4.71 E-3 1.85 E-2 bone 3.26 E O 1.28 [+1 bone Potable Water Ch Hd H-3 220. pC1/2 Stof/yr.
2.03 E-7(5) 2.03 E-7(5) 2.28 E-2 2.28 E-2 Infant 3302/yr.
3.08 E-7(5) 3.08E-7(5) 2.24 E-2 2.24 E-2 Fish AluTt Cs-137 11.7 pCl/kg
- 21. kg/yr.
7.14 E-5 1.09 E-4 liver 1.75 E-2 2.68 E-2 Ilver Teen
- 16. kg/yr.
5.19 E-5 1.49 E-4 Ilver 9.72 E-3 2.79 E-2 liver Game AdiiTt Cs-137 2191. pct /kg 110kg/yr(3) 7.14 E-5 1.09 E-4 liver 1,72 E+1 2.63 E*1 liver Child
- 41. kg/yr(3) 4.62 E-5 3.27 E-4 bone 4.15 E O 2494 [+1 bone Coinparison of the 1985 doses with those of the preoperational years 1083 and 1984 shows no significant differences. In fact, the direct radiation dose, the hghest contributer, is less in 1985 than in either of the two previous years.
(1)
From Table E-5 maaleum esposed individual. Reg. Guide 1.109.
(2) From Tables E-II, E-12. E-13 and E-14. Reg. Guide 1.109.
(3) Meat and Poultry pathway. Table E-5. Reg. Guide 1.109. litillaing 110. Eg/yr. for adults and 41. kg/yr. for children as the quantity of game consumed results in a Conservatively high Calculated dose.
(4)
Value identical for all age groups.
(5)
Total body critical organ dose f actors identical for all organs.
-.a
+
4
.s_
a l
i I
l l
l l
I III.
CONCLUSIONS i
l l
l l
l 26 l
I III.
CONCLUSIONS The Shoreham IJuclear Power Station reached i r.i t i a l cri ticali t y and operated up to 5% power during 1985.
This report presents the results of the first year of the operational REMP.
The pre-operational REM developed the baseline data used for comparison with the operatinc data.
It also established the methods, procedures and equipment used in the program and provided training for personnel.
Analyses of the environmental samples shcw results consistent with those found during the pre-operational yea s 1983 and 1984.
Sensi ti ve indicators revealed minute quantities of radioactive fallout from the October 1980 atmospheric nuclear weapons test by the Peoples Republic of China, in addition to radioactivity remaining from two decades of atmcspheric testing.
Along with these anomalies in the environment, expected normal bactground radioactivity has been measured in REMP samples.
Aquatic samples consisting of surface water, fish, invertebrates, aquatic plants and sediment were analyzed and reflected the normal background radiation found in this environment.
The atmospheric environment was sampled for airborne particulate matter, iodine, and noble gases.
Figure 1 represents the average weekly gross beta results in air particulates from January through December 1985.
Figure 2 shows the average monthly gross beta results in air particulates from February 1977 to December 1985.
All airborne radiciodine analyses were below detectable levels.
In addition, milk, potable water, geme, food products and rain water were sampled.
The results obtained from the analyses of these samples were similar to the expected values of radioactivity usually associated with these samples.
All radiciadine analyses of milk were below detectable level.
Direct radiation levels were relatively low and approximately the same at all locations.
Figure 3 shows the average quarterly TLD results in mR/ standard mcnth from January.1977 to December 1985.
Table 3 presents a comparico, of 1985 analyses that yielded positive results with the results obtained during the pre-operational years 1983 and 1984.
27
TABLE 3 COMPARISON OF 1985 POSITIVE RESULTS WITH FRE-OPEFATIONAL DATA Table / Sample Typei Unit / Isotope 1985 1984 1993 C1/SWA pCi/A H3 180-330 90-270 EO-2BO C2/ADF pCi/Kg Cs-137 7.7-17.4 3.4-21.4
.81-33 not detected C5/ACS p i/Kg Cs-137 30.4 24-49 not detected CB/ APT pCi/m3 Sr-90 4.4 x 10-*
not detected
- 1. 7 :
10-a (contrcl 1ccation)
C10/ RWA p Ci /,6 H3 199 344 140 C12/MLK pCi 44 Cs-137 4.6 10 13 pCi 42 Sr-90
.86-11
.69-17
.9-11 C13/PWA pCi /.2 H3 150-290 120-640 70-220 C14/GAX pCi/Kg Cs-137 Squirrel 3245 5340 4345 Raccoon 1136 124C 292 l
See Appendi: B for Sample Type Description i
l i
l i
28
I I
IV.
REFERENCES I
I I
29
IV.
REFERENCES 1.
Long Island Lighting Company.
"Shoreham Nuclear Power
- Station, Environmental Report, Construction Permit Stage", December 1977.
2.
United States Atomic Energy Commission, Directorate of Licensing
" Final Environmental Statement Related to Operation of Shoreham Nuclear Power Station", Docket No, 50-322, September 1972.
3.
Long Island Lighting Company.
"Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Final Safety Analysis Report".
4.
Radiation Management Corporation.
"Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 1977 Annual Rep or t ,
March 1978.
5.
Radiation Management Corporation.
"Shereham Nuclear Power Station Radiological En vi ron men t al Monitoring Program - 1978 Annual Report",
April 1979.
6.
Radiation Management Corpor ati on.
"Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 1979 Annual Report",
June 1980.
7.
Radiation Management Corporation.
"Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Preoperational Radiological Monitoring Program - 1980 Annual Repo-t",
September 1981.
8.
Radiation Management Corporation. "Shoreham Nuclear Power Statier:
Preoperational Radiological Monitoring Program - 1981 Annual Report,"
October 1982.
9.
- Eisenbud, M.,
Environmental Radioactivity, 2nd Ed.,
1973.
10.
National Academy of Sciences, Radioactivity i r. the Marine Envi ror mer t,
National Research Council, Washington, D.C.,
1971.
l 11.
Long Island Lighting Company.
"Shereham Nuclear Power Stat;on, j
Procedure Manual, Radi ol ogi cal Environmental Manitoring Frog am",
Revision 2 - October 1984.
I 12.
EA Science and Technology Shoreham Project Qu al i t y Assurance and Frocedures Manual. March 1985.
l 13.
U,S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide 1.109, j
Rev. 1-1977.
14.
Health Fhysics Journal, Vol. 38, No.4, April 1980.
l 15.
Teledyne Isotopes " Nuclear Recctor Envi rontr en t al Radiation Monitoring Duality Control Manual', IWL-0332-361.
30
IV.
REFEFENCES (Cont'd) 16.
Teledyne Isotopes "Ouali ty Contral Internal Controls and Audits, Envircnmenta; Anal ysi s Dep ar t e.en t ", IWL-0032-365.
17.
Teledyne Isotopes " Quality Assurante Manual,. Environnental Analysis Department Compliance with 10CFR50 Appendi:: B and Reg. Guide 4.15",
IWL-0032-395, 18.
Long Island Lighting and Teledyne Isotopes, 1982 Radi ol ogi c al Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Report.
19.
Long Island Lighting and Teledyne Isotopes, 1983 Radi ol ogi c al Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Report.
20.
Long Island Li ghting and Teledyne Isotopes, 1984 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Report.
i i
l l
l l
l 31
I 1
APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING FRCGRAM l
SUMMARY
l l I l
l I lI
=
1 t - _ _ _ -. --
M M
M RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION DOCKET NO. 50-322 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK JANUARY I to DECEMBER 31, 1985 i
ANALYSI5 AND LOWER LIMIT NWbER Of MEDILM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCAil0N NONR00 TINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION ME AN(2)
NAME MEAN(2)
ME AN(2)
REPORTED (UNIT OF KASUREENT) PERFORME D (LLD) (1),
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREME NT S Airborne Particulates Gross Beta 827 4
17(616/619) 2A2 0.2 mi NNE 18(52/52) 17(206/208) 0 (10 3 cgf 3)
(6-47)
(7-35)
(6.0-31) p Sr-89 64 0.3
-(0/48)
N/A N/A
-(0/16) 0
- Sr-90 64 0.8
-(0/48)
N/A N/A
-(0/16) 0 Gansna 64 90(48/48)
IlG1 16.6 mi SW 102(4/4) 92(16/16) 0 Be-7 r
(quarterly)
(62-108)
(93-120)
(67-120)
K-40 7
15(9/48) 503 3.1 mi E 21(2/4) 17(4/16) 0 (8.0-28.8)
(13.5-28.8)
(10.2-22.7)
Airborne lodine I-131 827 10
-(0/619)
N/A N/A
-(0/208) 0 (10 3pC1/m3)
Milk I-131 76 0.2
-(0/30)
N/A N/A
-(0/46) 0 (pC1/f)
Sr-89 51 2
-(0/21)
N/A N/A
-(0/30) 0 Sr-90 51 1
2.l(19/21) 8G2 10.8 al SSE 8.0(11/11) 4.9(30/30) 0 (0.86-4.6)
(3.9-11)
(1.3-11)
Gansna 76 K-40 100 1777(29/29) 11C1 2.4 al SW 1795(12/12) 1530(47/47) 0, (1160-2030)
(1550-2030)
(907-1980)
Cs-137 4
4.4(1/29) 681 1.5 mi ESE 5.2(2/16) 4.7(3/47 0
(3.9-6.6)
(3.1-6.6 (1) The LLDs quoted are the lowest actual LLDs obtained in the various media during the reporting period. Typical LLDs were determined for each nuclide as found in Tables C-19 and C-20.
Where all nuclides were <LLO f or a specific media no LLD was listed.
(2) Means calculated using detectable measurements only. Fractions of detectable measurements in parentheses.
(3) Indicator and Control locations are noted in Appendix B. Table B-1.
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENIAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STAT 10N DOCKEi NO. 50-322 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK JANUARY l to DECEMBER 31. 1985 ANALYSI5 AND LOWER LIMIT NUMBER Of MEDIlM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUllNE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION ME AN(2)
NAML MEAN(2)
MEAN(2)
REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1)
RANGE DISTANCE AND OIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS Surface Water H-3 12 100 200(2/8) 13G2 13 mi W 275(2/2) 275(2/4) 0 (pC1/f)
(180-220)
(200-350)
(200-350)
Sr-89 12 1
-(0/8)
N/A N/A
-(0/4)
O Sr-90 12 0.5
-(0/8)
N/A N/A
-(0/4) 0 Gamma 12
+
K-40 50 252(6/8) 13F1 9.4 mi W 308(2/2) 257(4/4)
U g
(l34-312)
(287-329)
(198-329)
Fish Sr-89 30 1
-(0/19)
N/A N/A
-(0/11) 0 (pC1/kg wet)
Sr-90 30 0.5
-(0/19)
N/A N/A
-(0/11) 0 Gamma 30 K-40 300 3554(19/19) 14Cl 2.1 al WNW 3679(9/9) 3486(11/11) 0 (2080-4540)
(2330-4540)
(2320-4450)
Cs-137 5
11.7(7/19) 3Cl 2.9 mi NE 12.6(2/10) 10.2(2/11) 0 (7.7-17.4)
( 7. 7-17.4 )
(9.3-11.0)
Aquatic Invertebrates Sr-89 25 1
-(0/16)
N/A N/A
-(0/9) 0 (pCl/kg wet)
Sr-90 25 1
-(0/16)
N/A N/A
-(0/9) 0 Gamma 25 K-40 300 3229(14/16) 3Cl 2.9 mi NE 3947(6/6) 2789(8/9) 0
(
(2190-8620)
(2560-8620)
(2290-3900) l Be-7 80 59.9(1/16) 13F1 9.4 mi W 74.2(1/1) 74.2(1/9)
U l
(1)
The LLDs quoted are the lowest actual LLDs obtained in the various media during the reporting period. Typical LLDs were determined for each nuclide as found on Tables C-19 and C-20.
Where all nuclides were <LLD for a specific media no LLO was listed.
(2)
Means calculated using detectable measurements only. Fractions of detectable measurements in parentheses.
M RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR0fMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION DOCKET NO. 50-322 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK JANUARY l to DECEMBER 31, 1985 ANALY5IS AND LOWER LIMIT NWSEk OF MEDllM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NtNBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN(2)
NAME MEAN(2)
MEAN(2)
REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORME D (LLD) (1)
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE ML A50klME NTS Potable Water H-3 12 100 220(2/8) 251 0.1 mi NNE 290(1/4) 160(1/4) 0 (pCi/f)
(150-290) 1,-131 12 0.1
-(0/8)
N/A N/A
-(0/4) 0 Gma 12 LLD
-(0/8)
N/A N/A
-(0/4) 0 3
Gmee Gma 4
(pC1/kg wet)
K-40 300 3315(4/4) 1452 0.4 mi WNW 4340(1/1)
-(0/0) 0 (2470-4340)
Cs-137 7
2191(4/4) 1452 0.4 mi WNW 4330(1/1)
-(0/0) 0 (992-4330)
Direct Radiation Gma 432 (mR/ Standard month)
Dose 1.5 3.9(360/360) 6Al 0.7 at ESE 5.l(12/12) a.l(12/72)
O Monthly (3.0-6.2)
(4.3-5.8)
(3.1-5.4)
Gma 143 Dose 1.5 3.8(119/119) 6Al 0.7 mi ESE 4.9(4/4) 3.9(24/24) 0 Quarterly (2.8-5.5)
(4.2-5.5)
(2.7-5.2)
(1) The LLDs quoted are the lowest actual LLDs obtained in the various media during the reporting period. Typical LLDs were determined for each nuclide as found on Tables C-19 and C-20.
Where all nucildes were (LLD for a specific media no LLU was listed.
(2) Means calculated using detectable measurements only. Fractions of detectable measurements in parentheses.
M M
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION DOCKET NO. 50-322 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK JANUARY I to DECEMBER 31, 1985 ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT NUMbEN OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION ML AN( 2 )
NAML MEAN(2)
MEAN(2)
REPORTEU (UNIT OF E ASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1)
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE HANGE MEASUREMENTS Aquatic Plants Sr-89 12 6
-(0/8)
N/A N/A
-(0/4) 0 (pCl/kg-dry)
'Sr-90 12 1
16.9(2/8) 16Al 0.4 mi NNW 27(1/2) 11(1/4) 0 (6.8-27)
Gama 12 Be-7 200 964(5/8) 4A3 0.2 mi ENE 1332(2/2) 1046(3/4) 0 (280-1700)
(964-1700)
(499-1590)
K-40 300 16293(8/8) 13F 1 9.4 mi W 32000(2/2) 24308(4/4)
O m
(3540-33300)
(25400-38600)(7030-38600) m Cs-137 6
45(1/8) 4A3 0.2 mi ENE 45(1/2) 42.8(1/4) 0 Ra-226 100 1130(1/8) 14Cl 2.1 at WNW 1130(1/2) 852(2/4) 0 (110-993)
Th-228 10 313(5/8) 4A3 0.2 mi ENE 495.5(2/2) 262.7(3/4) 0 (107-610)
(381-610)
(127-411)
Food Products Gama 33 (pCl/kg-wet) 1-131 4
-(0/19)
N/A N/A
-(0/14) 0 l
K-40 300 2243(19/19) 5F2 6.1 mi E 2447(7/7) 2342(14/14) 0 (1220-3620)
(1560-3590)
(1080-3160)
Cs-137 5
-(0/19)
N/A N/A
-(0/14) 0 (1) The LLDs quoted are the lowest actual LLDs obtained in the various media during the reporting period. Typical LLDs were determined for each nuclide as found on Tables C-19 and C-20.
Where all nuclides were <tLD for a specific media no LLD was listed.
(2) Means calculated using detectable measurements only. Fractions of detectable measurements in parentheses.
M M
M RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION DOCKET N0. 50-322 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK JANUARY l to DECEMBER 31, 1985 ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT NUMblR Uf MEDitM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION ME AN(2)
NAME MEAN(2)
MEAN(2)
REPORIED (UNIT OF MASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1)
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE ML A5UREME NT S Sediment (Beach)
Sr-89 4
2
-(0/3)
N/A N/A
-(0/1) 0 (pC1/kg dry)
Sr-90 4
1
-(0/3)
N/A N/A
-(0/1) 0 Gamma 4
K-40 900 2040(3/3) 2A4 0.4 mi NNE 2220(1/l) 3160(1/1) 0 (1710-2220)
Cs-137 8
-(0/3)
N/A N/A
-(0/1) 0 Ra-226 200 314(1/3) 14A1 0.8 mi WW 314(1/1)
-(0/1) 0 Th-228 60 225.7(3/3) 2A4 0.4 mi NNE 379(1/1) 169(1/1) 0 (l14-379)
Sediment (Offshore)
Sr-89 10 2
-(0/8)
N/A N/A
-(0/2) 0 (pC1/kg dry)
Sr-90 10 2
-(0/8)
N/A N/A
-(0/2) 0 Gamma 10 K-40 900 3441(8/8) 1681 1.3 mi NNW 6155(2/2) 2600(2/2) 0 (2000-6860)
(5450-6860)
(2150-3050)
Cs-137 10 30.4(1/8) 1681 1.3 mi NNW 30.4(1/2)
-(0/2) 0 Ra-226 200 1057(4/8 16B1 1.3 mi NNW 1155(2/2)
-(0/2) 0 (949-1260)
(1050-1260)
Th-228 60 394(8/8) 16B1 1.3 mi NNW 804(2/2) 210(2/2) 0 (174-912)
(695-912)
(196-224)
(1)
The LLDs quoted are the lowest actual LLDs obtained in the various media during the reporting period. Typical LLDs were determined for each nuclide as found in Tables C-19 and C-20.
Where all nuclides were <tLD f or a specific media no LLD was listed.
(2)
Means calculated using detectable measurements only. Fractions of detectable measurements in parentheses.
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION DOCKET NO. 50-322 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK JANUARY I to DECEMBER 31, 1985 ANALT515 AMU LUWLR LIMil NUMbtH Ut MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MLAN U)
NAML PtAN(2)
MEAN(2)
REPORTEC (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD) (1)
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASURLMENTS Precipitation Gross Beta 14 1
4.l(6/14) 12Al 0.9 mi WSW 5.5(3/7)
No Control 0
(pC1/f)
(2.6-8.2)
(4.1-8.2)
H-3 24 90 199(9/24) 12Al 0.9 at W5W 224(5/12)
No Control 0
(140-320)
(190-320)
Gama 14 g
Be-7 60 110(1/14) 12Al 0.9 mi WSW 110(1/7)
No Control 0
Noble Gas Kr-85 47 15 30(47/47) 1452 0.4 mi WNW 30(47/47)
No Control 0
(pC1/m3)
(24-40)
(24-40)
Xe-133 47 11
-(0/47)
N/A N/A No Control 0
(1)
The LLDs quoted are the lowest actual LLDs obtained in the various media during the reporting period. Typical LLDs were determined for each nuclide as found on Tables C-19 and C-20.
Where all nuclides were <LLD for a specific media no LLD was listed.
(2) Means calculated using detectable measurements only. Fractions of detectable measurements in parentheses.
l 1
l i
l i
l
)
l i
I APPENDIX B SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS i
l l
1 l
l 1
39
AF?a DIX E Sample Deti gr.a t i on LILCO's Fadic1cgical En vi r c nmen t al Manitoring Program (REMF) id2nt f:es camples by a three part code.
The first two letters are the powe-station identification code, in this case "EN".
Tne nent three letters era for :he media sampled.
SWA = Eurface Water (LI Ecund)
GMK = Goat Milk ADF a Fish'**
PW1 = Pctable Water (greur dwa ter )
ADI Invertebrates
<2' SAX = Game
'2'
=
AOP = Aquatic Pl ar. t s ' *
- FPV = ~ood Products'2' AQS = Sedinent FPF = Fruit AFT = Airborne Particulates IDM = Immersion Dese (TLD)
AIO = Airborne Iodine NBG = Neale Gas MLK = Milk RWA = Precipitation (Fain W a t er.'
The last four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from the site.
Of these, the first two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22 1/2 degrces centered about the reactor site.
Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis, and other sectors are nambered ir a cloclwise direction, i.e.,
2=NNE, 3=NE, 4=ENE, etc.
The next digit is a letter which represents the radi al distance from the plant:
S = On site location E = 4-5 miles off site A = O-1 miles off site F = 5-10 miles off site E= 1-2 miles off site G= 10-20 miles off site C = 2-3 miles off site H= >20 miles off site D = 2-4 c,iles off site The last number is the location numerical designation within each sector anc rene, e.g,,
1,2,3,....For example, the designation SN-SWA-3C1 woulc indicate a sample in the SNPS program SN, consisting of surface water SWf, which had been col l ected in the 22-1/2 degree sector centered on the northeast axis (3) between the site boundary and 2-3 miles off site (C).
The number 1 indicates that this is sampling station No.
1 in the designated area.
Sampling Locations All sampling locations and specific information about the i r.di vi du al locations are given in Table B-1.
Tables B-2 through B-5 list the sampling locations and media required by Technical Specifications.
A more specific means of classification will be noted in th e comment (2'
section of each l aboratory report for these samples.
For enample, AOI will be designated, in the sample description, as aquatic invertebrate.
However, the comment section will specify the sample type by the generally accepted commor. name of the sanple ineolved.
In this case, clam, lobster, crab or other aquatic invertebrate would be listed in the comment section.
40
Maps B-1, B-2 and B-3 show the locaticns of sampling stations with respect to the site.
These maps are tracings of portions of larger maps or epar ed by LILCO's Servey Divisien after a r.
ertensive land survey of REM' monitoring locations.
Additional information can be obtained by ref errirg to the Site and Vicinity Map of the Shereham Nuclear Power Staticr (Mcp B-2),
the map cf Long Isl and ar.d Cornecticut Shore (Map B-?) anc~
oy I
contacting either LILCD's En vi r onmer.t al En g i r.eer i r.g Departnert or Su-'ef Division.
TABLE B _
LOCATIDN SAMPLE SECTOR CODE LOCATION TYPE N
191 Beach east of intake, 0.3 mi. N IDM(i)
NNE 2S1 Well, on site, 0.1 mi. NNE PWA(4)
NE 351 Site Boundary, 0.1 mi. NE APT (*:, AIO ' * ;, IDM
- 4 :
ENE 431 Site Baundary, 0.1 mi. ENE IDM(4)
E SE2 Site Boundary, 0.1 mi. E IDM(*)
ESE 6S2 Site Bounda y, 0.1 mi. ESE APT (*),AIO(*,IDM(4' S
951 Service Rcad, 0.3 mi. S APT,AIG,IDM(4i, RW4 S
9S2 East Gate SNPS, 0.3 mi. S IDM(*)
WSW 1252 Game, Western Marsh, 0.3 mi. WEW GAX W
1352 Well, on site, 0.2 mi. W PWA(*)
W 13S3 Site Boundary, 0.3 mi. W IDM(*), GAX WNW 1452 St. Joseph's Villa, C.4 mi WNW IDM(*),GAX,N93 NW 1551 Beach west of intake, 0.3 mi. NW IDM(*)
NNW 1652 Site Boandary, 0.2 mi. NNW IDM ( 4 )
NNE 2A2 West end of Creek Road,0.2 mi.NNE APT (1), AID *?,IEM(4)
NME 2A3 Naarest Residence, 0.2 mi. NNE APT,AIO,IDM(t)
NNE 2A4 Beach, 0.4 mi. NNE ADS (*)
NE 3A2 Riverhead Town Beach, 0.7 mi. NE ADS ENE 4A3 Wading River, Eastern Marsh, SWA,AOI,AOP, ADS 0.2 mi.ENE ESE 6Al Sound Road, 0.7 mi, ESE IDM(*)
SE 7A2 North Country Road, 0.7 mi.
SE AFT, AID,IDM(*)
SSE BA3 North Country Road, 0.6 mi. SSE APT,A:0,IDM(6$
SSW 10A1 North Country Road, 0.3 mi. SSW APT, AIO, IDM (4 )
SW 11A1 Site Boundary, 0.2 mi. SW IDM(*)
WSW 12A1 Meteorological Towe, 0.9 mi. WSW AP~,AIO,IDM(*),RNA WNW 14A1 Brookhaven Town Beach. 0.8 mi. WNW AOS NNW 16Al Aquatic locatien, west jetty AOI,A2F' of intake canal O.4 mi. NNW ESE C
6Bl**
Remsen Road, Wading River, GMK(4),PW4(*:
1.5 mi. ESE SE 7B1 Overhill Road, Wading River, APT ( * ), AIO ( 4 ), IDM ( t )
1.4 mi. SE SE 7B3 Farm stand, 1.7 mi. SE FPV,FPF SSE 891 Farm stana 1.2 mi. SSE FPV(*)
NNW 16B1 Long Island Sound, 1.3 mi. NNW AOS,5WA NE 3C1 Outfall area, aquatic location SWA ( * ), AC F ( t ), ADI ( ? )
B-5, 2.9 mi. NE AOP,AOS 41
TABLE B-1 (Cont'd)
LOCATION SAMP E SECTOR CODE LOCATION TYPE E
SC2 Farm, 2.8 mi. E FPV,FPF(t)
SW 11C1 Gcat Farm, Rand al l Rd, 2.4 mi. SW GMK WSW 12C1 Local Store, McCarracks Dairy, MLK***
2.0 mi WSW WNW 14C1 Outfall aree, aquatic location SWA *),ACFI*i,AOI
- )
SDI Wildwood State Park, 3.4 mi. E IDM(4)
E SD3 Wildwood Stcte Part, 3.1 mi. E APT, IDM ( A ), AIC WSW 12D1 North Shore Beach Substaticn, APT, AID,IDM(*)
3.7 mi. WSW E
SE1 Farm, 5.1 mi. E FPF ESE 6El LILCO ROW, 4.8 mi. ESE IDM(*)
SE 7El Cal vert on, 4.9 mi. SE IDM(4)
SSE GE1 Calverton, 4.4 mi. SSE IDM(*)
S 9El Brookhaven National Laboratory IDM(4) 5.0 mi, S SSW 10E1 Ridge Substation, 4.0 mi. SSW IDM(*)
SW 11El LILCO ROA, 4.7 mi.
SW IDM(*)
W 13E1 Longview Ave. and Rocky Point IDM(*)
Landing Rd.,
4.5 mi W
E C
5F2 Farm, 6.1 mi. E FFV E
C 5F3 Farm, 7.8 mi. E APT,AIO,IDM(4)
SSE BF2 Goat Farm, Wading River.
Rd.,
GMK approximately 9.5 mi SSE SSW C
10F1 Goat Farm, 9,2 mi. S5W GMK(*)
W C
13F1 Background aquatic location AOI,AOP,5WA 9.4 mi, W ESE C
6G1 Hampton Bays Substation, IDM(*)
19.0 mi. ESE SSE C
BG1 Sunrise Hwy., Wading River Rd.
APT,AIO,IDM(t) exit, 10.1 mi. SSE SSE C
BG2 Dairy Farm, Center Moriches, MLK 10.8 mi. SSE SW C
11G1 MacArthur Substation, 16.6 mi. SW APT (*),4IO(*),IDM(*)
WSW C
12G1 Central Islip Substation, IDM(*)
19.9 mi. WSW WSW C
12G2 Flowerfield Substation, APT,AIO,IDM(t) 15.4 mi. WSW W
C 13G2 Background aquatic location, SWA(*),ADP, ADS 13.3 mi. W AQF(*),AOI(*)
WSW C
12H1 Farm, 26 mi. WSW FPV(*),FPFi*)
Denotes Control Location C
=
Denotes SNPS Technical Specification sampling locations and sample
=
type.
Location 6B1 is a control lo:ation for Potable Water and indicator
=
location for milk.
Bottled Milk
- =
42
REMP LOCATIONS REQUIRED BY SNPS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TABLE B-2 AIRBORNE PAFTICULATES AND AIRBOFNE IODINE M2NITORING STATION 3 Location Codes NUREG-0473 Sho eham FEMP Location Description A1 652 Site Boundary, 0.1 mi. ESE A2 2A2 Wcst end of Creek Road, 0.2 ni. NTJE A3 351 Site Boundary, 0.1 mi. NE A4 7B1 Overhill Road, 1.4 mi. SE A5 11G1 MacArthur Substation, :6.6 ni. SW TABLE B-3 WATERBOFNE MOtJITORING STATIONS Location Codes NUFEG-0473 Shoreham REMP Locatien Descrirtion WA1 13G2 Surface, backgrcund area, 13.3 mi. W WA2 14C1 Surface, outfall area, 2.1 mi. WNU WA3 3C1 Surface, outfall area, 2.9 mi. NE Wbi 251 Potable Water, well on site, 0.1 ri. NNE Wb2 1352 Potable Water, well on site, 0.2 mi, W Wd1 2A4 Sediment, Beach, 0.4 mi NNE TABLE B-4 INGESTION MONITORING STATIOf1S Location Codes NUREG-0473 Shoreham REMP Location Description Ia1 6B1 Goat Farm, 1.54 mi. ESE l
Ia2 10F1 Goat Farm, 9.2 mi. SSW l
Ib1 3C1 Fish and Invertebrates, octfall area, 2.o mi. NE Ib2 14C1 Fish and Invertebrates, outfall area, 2.1 mi. WNW Ib3 13G2 Fish and Invertebrates, background, 13.3 mi. W Ici 891 Local Farm, 1.2 mi. SSE l
Ic2 SC2 Local Farm, 2.8 mi. E Ic3 12H1 Backgecund Farm, 26 mi. WSW l
t 43
REMP LOCATIONS REQUIRED BY SNPS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (CONT'D)
TABLE B-5 DIRECT RADIATION MONITORING STATIONS I
Location Codes NUREG-0473 Shoreham REMP Location Description DR1 151 Beach east of intake, 0.3 mi. N DR2 2A2 West end of Creek Road, 0.2 mi. NNE DR3 351 Site Boundary, 0.1 mi. NE DR4 4S1 Site Boundary, 0.1 mi. ENE DR5 552 Site Boundary, 0.1 mi. E DR6 6S2 Site Boundary, 0.1 mi. ESE DR7 7A2 North Country Road, 0.7 mi. SE DR8 8A3 North Countr y Road, 0.6 mi. SSE DR9 951 Service Road SNPS, 0.3 mi. S DR10 10A1 North Country Road, 0.3 mi. SSW DR11 11A1 Site Boundary, 0.2 mi. SW DR12 12A1 Meteorological Tower, 0.9 mi. WSW DR13 13S3 Site Boundary, 0.3 mi. W DR14 14S2 St. Joseph's Vill a, 0.4 mi. WNW DR15 15Si Beach west of intake, 0.3 mi. NW DR16 16S2 Site Boundary, 0.2 mi. NNW DR17 SD3 Wildwood State Park, 3.1 mi. E DR18 6El LILCO ROW, 4.8 mi. ESE DR19 7El Calverton, 4.9 mi. SE DR2O BE1 Calverton, 4.4 mi. SSE DR21 9El Brookhaven National Laboratory, 5.0 mi. S DR22 10E1 Ridge Substation, 4.0 mi. SSW DR23 11El LILCO ROW, 4.7 mi. SW DR24 12D1 North Shore Beach Substation, 3.7 mi. WSW DR25 13E1 Longview Ave. and Rocky Point Landing Rd. 4.5 mi, W DR26 SD1 Wildwood State Park, 3.4 mi. E DR27 SF3 Dairy Farm, 7.8 mi. E DR28 7B1 Overhill Road, 1.4 mi. SE DR29 12G2 Flowerfield Substation, 15.4 mi. WSW DR30 12G1 Central Islip Substation, 19.9 mi. WSW DR31 11G1 MacArthur Substation, 16.6 mi. SW DR32 BG1 Wading River Road, 10.1 mi. SSE DR33 6G1 Hampton Bays Substation, 19.0 mi. ESE DR34 6A1 Sound Road, 0.7 mi. ESE DR35 2A3 Nearest Residence, 0.3 mi. NNE DR36 9S2 East Gate SNPS, 0.3 mi. S 44
7 SONNO N
- ==-
1 l
1
$$LAMO
/
l s====
l f
lf
@m
=
LON6
\\
'\\
g:
- >..,st....... -..
/
f.
.... ; % '. 1. 5./ q...-; 3... g.,.:
Q
... ~
g
.. e,
1
..i. s*...
~ = ~ =..
2 y
.. 1 i
~~. Q o
. '*'. ~,..:&..
Im
~ ~ ~
j,,,g.
sar amuse ouea are ano,
...~~
-- g,......-- h Wy
~
h g
gg.
M D MONrrORNG g
~)
i l
\\
l ll
/
1
\\
y
/
5 I
's j5 I
I s
I
/
\\
I
{
/
s'
\\\\\\
l
\\
l
/
\\
\\
\\
f l
s.
I
/
/
/'
I 3'
s 1 \\
/
/
/
\\
's#
N *g l
/
R l
/
\\
d_,
5
~~~
l 9 ' g.~',
~ ~ ~ ' ' -
j I
-Q'
' //
' s,
_s~~
s 1
x 3
/
',. I
\\
N I
/
E\\
s E
3
.a l
l 0/
/
l l~ \\ $\\
~\\
\\'
N
~
ll'
/
I s
's f
I
\\
s
/
l
\\
\\
's
/S!tg s
f
\\
\\
b
/
\\
N I
/
j g/
l
\\L i
f n
I 8Y b
\\
\\ k l
\\- E 1"
I
\\
\\
If
/
g
\\
k6 k
'I 1
43 1
I iT $N
'7
\\
\\
I
\\
!8 lg
. i i
3 l
\\r
- 0. a a\\
s i
l N
\\
s f
n x
\\
s [,s [p
, fx\\
\\
h I
\\
' n\\ yls g'l y
I N
.- r
}f
/
~~
_ {
~~ - f% fy_%..
_ f.
<$ w,rcw
hlkI /,
Qi fg'ad l
g 1
Y' '?
I
,I'V g").
//
> (\\ 9 x gN/sh l!
\\
'x n
h's
/,
N x
3 18 ^ /.8 ' g(l i
N;t/
I ad
\\
A
/
7i
\\
zf*
/
'N
\\ g/~
~
/ x W l/,
g, I
y 1
1
.g 47
~ ~
~
APPENDIX C DATA TABLES l
4e
TABLE C-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, STRONTIUM-89* and -90 AND GAMMA EMITTER $**
IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES Results in Units of pCi/f 1 2 sigma LOCATION CODE COLLECTION DATE H-3 I-131***
Sr-89*
Sr-90 K-40 SN-SWA-4A3 05/01/85
<100
<0.2
<2
<0.8
<50 10/07/85
<200
<0.3
<2 (0.7
<bu SM-SWA-3Cl 06/03/85 220 t 80
<0.4
<2
<0.6 291 t 48 11/14/85
<100
<0.2
<3
<1 259 t 29
$N-SWA-13G2 (c1) 05/30/85 350 t 80
<0.3
<2
<0.7 215 t 37 11/13/85 200 t 80
<0.2
<2
<0.7 198 1 57 SM-5WA-13F1 (c1) 05/13/85
<100
<0.3
<2
<0.6 329 i 5b 12/02/85
<200
<0.3
<1
<0.7 287 2 39 SM-SWA-14C1 06/04/85 180 t 80
<0.4
<4
<2 134 1 49 11/14/85 (200
<0.3
<2
<0.5 234 i 25 SN-SWA-1681 06/04/85
<200 (0.3
<2
<0.6 282 1 39 11/14/85
<100
<0.4
<2
<0.5 312 1 31 Sr-89 results are corrected for decay to the sample stop date.
- All other gamma emitters not listed were <LLD; typical LLO's are given on Tables C-19 and C-20.
l-131 results determined by radiochemical analysis.
(ci) Denotes Control Location
M M
M TABLE C-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM-89* AND -90 AND GAMMA EMITTERS ** IN FISH SAMPLES Results in Units of pCl/kg (WET) i 2 sigma LOCATION CODE COLLECTION OATC DESCRIPTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 Cs-131 SN-AQF-3C1 06/03/85 Sea Robin
<2
<0.5 4110 t 410 (6
06/03/85 Winter Flounder
<3
<1 4390 t 440 17.4 t 6.7 06/03/85 Windowpanc
<3
<0.7 3730 1 370
<9 06/03/85 Little Skate
<3
<2 2380 t 240 7.73 1 4.25 06/03/85 Blackfish
<2
<1 3790 t 380
<10 10/23/85 Little Skate
<2
<1 2080 1 210
<7 10/23/85 Sea Robin
<2
<1 3790 1 380 (9
10/23/85 Summer Flounder
<2
<1 3670 t 370
<7 10/23/85 Windowpane
<2
<1 3600 t 360
<10 10/23/85 Winter Flounder
<2
<4 2880 t 490
<50 o
SM-AQF-13G2 (c1) 05/30/85 Little Skate
<4
<2 2550 t 260
<10 05/30/85 Windowpane
<1
<0.6 3390 t 340 11.0 1 4.6 05/30/85 Sea Robin
<4
<3 3600 t 380
<30 05/30/85 Winter Flounder
<2
<1 4050 t 410
<20 06/19/85 Little Skate
<2
<2 2390 1 240 9.34 2 4.34 06/19/85 Winter Flounder
<0.8
<0.5 4450 t 450
<5 06/19/85 Sea Robin
<0.9
<0.5 4140 t 410
<7 11/13/85 Sea Robin
<1
<0.8 3900 1 390
<6 11/13/85 Windowpane
<2
<2 3800 t 380
<8 11/13/85 Little State
<1
<1 2320 t 230
<10 11/13/85 Winter Flounder
<1
<0.8 3760 1 380
<9 SN-AQF-14Cl 06/04/85 Sea Robin (2
<1 4070 1 410 10.0 1 4.1 06/04/85 Windowpane
<4
<2 3650 t 370 15.0 t 4.1 06/04/85 Winter Flounder
<4
<1 4070 t 410
<8 06/04/85 Little Skate
<4
<2 2330 t 230
<10 10/30/85 Little Skate
<4
<3 2390 t 240 10.3 t 4.' 7 10/30/85 Sea Robin
<1
<0.7 4050 t 410
<6 10/30/85 Summer Flounder
<2
<1 4540 1 450 12.8 1 6.8 10/30/85 Windowpane
<2
<0.9 3670 t 370 8.98 1 4.67 10/30/85 Winter Flounder
<2
<1 4340 1 430
<7 l
I I
Sr-89 results are corrected for decay to the sample stop date.
All other gamma emitters not ilsted were <LLD; typical LLDs are given on Tables C-19 and C-20.
l (c1) Denotes Control Location l
l i
{
M M
M TABLE C-3 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTilN-89* ANO -90 ANO GAmA EMITTER 5" IN INVERIEBRATE SAMPLES Results in Units of pCi/kg (WET) t 2 sigma LOCATION CODE COLLECTION DATE DESCRIPTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 Th-228 Be-7 SM-AQl-4A3 05/01/85 Sof t Shell Class
<5
<2 2550 t 260
<10 59.9 t 30.7 10/07/85 Sof t Shell Clams
<2
<1 3010 t 120
<10
<50 SN-AQl-16Al 05/14/85 Blue Mussels (2
<1 2150 1 250
<10
<bo 10/10/85 Blue Mussels
<2
<2 2190 t 220
<8 (40 SN-AQl-3Cl 06/03/85 Whelk
<100( a)
(20(a) 3420 t 750
<100
<600 06/03/85 Lobster
<2
<1 8620 t 860
<30
<200 06/20/85 Wheik
<5 (4
3430 1 440 (60
<300 10/23/85 Lobster
<4
<1 2560 2 260
<10
<70 10/23/85 Squid
<3
<2 2980 t 300
<20
<100 10/23/85 Whelk
<3
<2 2620 t 260
<10
<bo o,
SM-AQI-14Cl 06/04/85 Lobster
<3
<1 2620 t 260
<20
<100 06/04/85 Whelk (b) 06/19/85 Whelk (b) 10/30/85 Lobsters
<5
<2 2620 t 260
<20 (100 10/30/85 Squid
<5
<2 3520 t 350
<10
<10 10/30/85 Whelk
<5
<3 2570 2 260 (20 (90 SN AQI-13F1 (c1) 05/13/85 Mussels
<2
<2 2390 1 240
<10 74.2 1 38.0 12/02/85 Mussels (b)
' SM-AQl-13G2 (c1) 05/13/85 Blue Mussels
<2
<2 2640 t 260
<10
<70 06/19/85 Whelk
<3
<2 2510 t 260
<20
<100 06/19/85 Lobster
<5
<3 3900 t 390
<30
<200 10/09/85 Blue Mussels
<1
<1 2290 t 110 (10
<50 '
11/13/85 Squid
<2
<2 3190 t 320
<30 (200 11/13/85 Lobster
<2
<1 2810 t 280 (20
<90 11/19/85 Whelk (4
<3 2520 2 250
<30
<200 Sr-89 results are corrected for decay to the sample stop date.
All other gamma emitters not listed were <tLD; typical LL0s are given on Tables C-19 and C-20.
(a)
Since there were only 34.2 grams of sample provided, the required LL0s could not be met.
(b)
Sample Unavailable (c1) Denotes Control Location
EEEEE TABLE C-4 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTitM-89* AND -90 AND GAMMA EMITTER $** IN AQUATIC PLANT SAMPLES Results in Units of pCl/69 (DRY) i 2 sigma LOCATION CODE COLLECTION OATE Sr-89 Sr-90 Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-228 SN-AQP-4A3 05/01/85
<7
<3 964 2 198 33300 t 3300
<50 45.0 t 22.5 (500 381 1 47 Ulva T5cus SN-AQP-4A3 10/07/85
<6
<2 1700 t 270 16200 t 1600
<60
<40
<100 610 t 61 Ulva
$N-AQP-13F1 (c1) 05/13/85
<20
<5 1050 t 270 25400 2500
<100 42.8 i 23.7 993 1 435 411 i 41 Algae (Unidentified)
SM-AQP-13F1 (ci) 12/02/85
<20 11 t 4 1590 t 210 38600 t 3900
<60
<30 710 t 350 250 t 37 Algae
.(Unidentified) 5N-AQP-13G2 (c1) 05/13/85
<30
<5 499 i 285 26200 1 2600
<100
<40
<100
<10 Ulva gn
$N-AQP-13G2 (c1) 10/09/85
<5
<1
<200 7030 t 700
<30
<20 (300 127 t IT Codium SN-AQP-16Al 05/14/85
<30
<5 1300 300 28200 t 2800
<100
<4 0 (800 (90 Ulva
$N-AQP-16Al 10/10/85
<30 27113
<300 8800 t 880
<10
<30
<500 278 t 31 Codium SM-AQP-14Cl 05/20/85
<20
<5 280 t 131 14600 t 1500 (100 (20
<300 107 t 15 Enteromorpha sp.
SN-AQP-14Cl 10/28/85
<20 6.8 2 4.2 576 i 307 11200 t 1100
<200
<40 1130 t 650
<70 Ascophyelum Fuscus SN-AQP-3Cl Ulva 06/05/85 (20
<4
<70 3540 1 350
<20
<6
<100
<10 Chondrus SM-AQP-3C1 10/25/85
<20
<4
<300 14500 t 1500
<200
<30 (500 189 t 42 Ulva chandrus Sr-89 results are corrected for decay to the sanple stop date.
All other gamma emitters not listed were <LLO; typical LL0s are found on Tables C-19 and C-20.
(c1) Denotes Control Location
M M
M TABLE C-5 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTitM-89* ANO -90 AND GAM 4A EMITTERS ** IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES Results in Units of pCl/kg (DRY) t 2 sigma SAMPLE COLLECTION LOCATION CODE LOCATION DATE Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 Ra-226 Th-228 Cs-137 SM-AQS-3Cl Of fshore 06/03/85
<5
<2 3290 1 380 949 t 454 257 1 46
<30 Of f shore 11/14/85
<2
<2 3020 t 300
<400 229 2 23
<20
$N-AQS-4A3
. Wading River 05/01/85
<5
<2 2100 t 290
<500 316 1 32
<20 Wading River 10/07/85
<2 (0.9 2130 1 220 969 t 341 174 1 36 (20 SM-AQS-13G2 (c1)
Offshore 05/30/85
<2
<2 2150 t 350
<400 196 2 24
<30 Of f shore 11/13/85
<4
<2 3050 2 310
<4 00 224 i 40
<20
$N-AQS-14Cl Offshore 06/04/85
<2
<2 2680 t 410
<400 220 1 24
<30 Of f shore 11/14/85
<4 (2
2000 t 200 (200 352 i 35
<10 SM-AQS-16BI Dffshore 06/04/85
<4
<2 5450 t 600 1050 t 500 695 t 70
<50 Offshore 11/14/85
<4
<2 6860 t 690 1260 t 300 912 1 91 30.4 i 8.5
$N-AQS-3A2 Beach 05/16/85
<2
<2 1710 t 180
<400 184 1 27
<20 SN-AQS-2A4 Peach 05/16/85
<2
<2 2220 t 220 (200 379 i 38
<10 SM-AQS-14A1 Beach 05/16/85
<3
<2 2190 t 220 314 i 142 114 1 11
<8
$N-AQS-13G2 (c1)
Beach 05/13/85
<2
<1 3160 t 320
<4 00 169 i 24
' (20 Sr-89 results are corrected for decay to the sample stop date.
All other gammt emitters were <LLD; typical LLDs are found on Tables C-19 and C-20.
(c1) Denotes Control Location
M TABLE C-6 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIRBORNE PARTICULATES Results in Units of 10-3 pCl/m3 t 2 sigma LOCATION CODES COLLECTION DATES SN-APT-2A2
$N-APT-2A3 SM-APT-351 SM-APT-5D3 SN-APT-5F3 SN-APT-652 SN-APT-7A2 Sh-APT-7Bl (ct)
JANUARY 85 01/02/85-01/08/85 18 t 4 19 t 5 17 1 4 18 t 4 17 t 4 14 t 4 21 1 4 18 i 4 01/08/85-01/15/85 16 t 4 15 t 4 11 t 3 16 t 4 17 t 4 17 t 4 18 t 4 15 t 3 01/15/85-01/22/85 21 2 4 20 t 4 20 t 3 20 t 4 24 t 4 24 2 4 21 1 4 21 1 3 01/22/85-01/29/85 18 t 4 18 1 4 18
- 3 13 1 3 18 i 4 19 i 4 18 2 4 15 1 3 FEBRUARY 01/29/85-02/05/85 23 t 6 30 t 5 29 t 6 18 1 4 16 i 4 18 t 4 21 1 4 18 t 3 02/05/85-02/13/85 14 2 3 13
- 3 15 t 3 15
- 3 14
- 3 14 i 3 14 t 4 15 1 3 02/13/85-02/19/85 22 t 4 24 t 5 20 t 4 24 2 4 29 2 4 24 t 4 24 1 4 23 t 4 g
02/19/85-02/26/85 15 2 3 15 t 4 13 2 3 16 t 4 15 t 3 17
- 4 17 i 4 16 1 3 MARCH 02/26/85-03/05/85 16 t 4 18 t 4 13
- 3 16 t 4 14 1 4 13 2 4 16 i 4 14 1 3 03/05/85-03/12/85 24 24 21 1 4 25 1 4 22 1 4 19 2 3 25 1 4 20 t 4 23 2 3 03/12/85-03/19/85 14
- 3 13 1 4 15 t 3 13 t 4 14 2 4 11 1 4 13 i 4 12 t 3 03/19/85-03/26/85 14 2 4 17 1 4 15 1 3 16 t 4 14 1 4 15 t 4 lb i 4 15 t 3 03/26/85-04/02/85 10 1 4 11 2 4 11 i 3 10 1 4 9i4 9i4 11 1 4 11 1 3 APRIL 04/02/85-04/09/85 9t 4 11 1 4 92 3 10 2 4 13 1 4 9t 4 8i4 10 t 3 04/09/85-04/16/85 24 2 4 22 2 4 21 2 4 22 t 4 22 t 4 24 i 4 22 1 4 20 t 3 04/16/85-04/23/85 17 1 4 18 2 4 18 2 4 17 1 4 17 1 4 20 1 4 19 i 4 19 1 3 04/23/85-04/30/85 814 (6 (a)
(10 (b) 7t4 10 t 4 92 4 61 4
,61 3 (a)
Light in color showing Ilttle deposition of particulate matter and no measurable activity.
(b)
See Appendix F (c1) Denotes Control Location
M M
M M
M TABLE C-6 Cont.)
CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIRBORNE PARTICULATES Results in Units of 10-3 pC1/m3 t 2 sigma LOCATION CODE 5 COLLECTION DATES SN-APT-2A2
$N-APT-2A3 SM-APT-3SI SN-APT-5D3 SN-APT-5F3 SM-APT-652 SN-APT-7A2 SN-APT-781 (ci)
EAl 04/30/85-05/07/85 16 1 4 17 t 4 15 t 3 13 t 3 17 t 4 15 t 4 16 2 4 20 t 4 05/07/85-05/14/85 17 t 4 12 t 4 14 t 4 20 2 4 26 t 6 19 t 4 17 1 4 22 1 4 05/14/85-05/21/85 13 t 3 14 2 4 13 t 3 12 1 3 13 t 3 12 1 3 12 t 3 11 2 3 05/21/85-05/28/85 19 2 4 16 t 4 16 t 4 16 1 4 18 2 4 15 t 4 14 t 4 16 2 4 JUNE 05/28/85-06/04/85 1824 16 t 3 18 2 4 14 t 4 18 t 4 15 t 4 17 2 4 12 t 3 06/04/85-06/11/85 11 2 4 11 2 3 10 t 4 10 t 4 11
- 4 8t 4 8t 4 10 t 4 06/11/85-06/18/85 13 t 3 12 2 3 12 1 4 12 t 3 12 t 4 12 t 3 13 t 4 13
- 3 06/18/85-06/25/85 22 t 4 (c) 19 t 5 (c)
<5 (a) 23 i 4 21 t 4 19 i 4 22 1 4 16 2 4 06/25/85-07/02/85 72 3 72 3 12 t 3 8*3 to t 3 9i3 14 t 3 10 t 3 JULY 07/02/85-07/09/85 26 t 4 20 t 4 47 1 5 39 i 7 21 t 4 15 1 4 24 1 4 19 2 4 07/09/85-07/16/85 24 t 4 21 1 4 19 2 4 23 i 4 20 1 4 18 t 4 21 t 4 22 1 4 07/16/85-07/23/85 27 t 4 21 1 4 21 1 4 19 t 4 30 t 5 24 1 4 23 1 4 22 1 4 07/23/85-07/30/85 12 t 4 1214 15 1 4 9i4 15 t 4 8t 4 12 t 4 81 4 AUGUST 07/30/85-08/06/85 15 t 4 12 t 4 11 t 4 12 1 4 10 t 4 29 t 16 12 t 4 61 3 08/06/85-08/13/85 15 t 3 12 i 3 12 2 3 11 t 3 13 3
12 t 3 12 3
11 t 3 08/13/85-08/20/85 22 2 4 26 1 4 23 t 4 28 i 4 23 t 4 25 2 4 24 t 4 27 2 4 08/20/85-08/27/85 19 2 4 17 4
17 2 4 17 t 4 18 t 4 20 t 4 16 i 4 19 t 4 08/27/85-09/03/85 21 i 4 17 2 4 16 t 4 19 4
27 2 4 21 2 4 17 t 4 17 t 4 (a)
Light in color showing little deposition of particulate matter and no measurable activity.
(b)
See Appendix F (c)
Power failure; collection dates 06/18/85-06/24/85.
(cl) Denotes Control Location
M M
M M
TABLE C-6 (Cont.)
CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIRBORNE PARTICULATES Results in Units of 10-3 pC1/m3 2 2 sigma LOCATION CODES COLLECTION DATES
$N-APT-2A2 SN-APT-2A3 SM-APT-351 SN-APT-503 SM-APT-5F3
$N-APT-652 SN-APT-7A2
$N-APT-7BI (c1)
SEPTEMBER 09/03/85-09/10/85 20 t 4 17 t 4 18 i 4 19 t 4 19 i 4 15 t 4 18
- 4 21 2 4 09/10/85-09/17/85 14 1 4 15 t 4 13 2 4 12 2 4 13 t 4 10 t 3 9i3 9t 3 09/17/85-09/24/85 35 t 4 26 t 4 17 1 4 31 t 4 30 t 4 28 t 4 27 i 4 26 t 4 09/24/85-10/01/85 15 t 8
<10 (b) 20 t 4 17
- 8 20 t 5 20 t 4 12 2 8
<10 (b)
OCTOBER 10/01/85-10/08/85 14 t 2 15 t 6 to t 4 17 10 12 t 4 15 t 4 10 t 4 (a) 10/08/85-10/15/85 16 t 3 20 t 4 18 t 4 17 t 4 21 t 4 17 1 4 17 t 4 15 t 6 10/15/85-10/22/85 21 i 3 16 t 3 16 2 3 17 1 3 18 1 3 17 2 3 16 t 3 17 1 3 10/22/85-10/29/85 15 t 4 12 t 3 16 2 4 15 t 4 17 i 4 16 2 4 17 1 4 17 i 4 NOVEMBER v.
as 10/29/85-11/06/85 10 t 3 62 3 8t 3 92 3 82 3 72 3 62 3 7t 3 11/06/85-11/12/85 13 2 4 14 t 4 13 t 4 11 2 4 19 i 4 13 2 4 12 t 4 12 t 4 11/12/85-11/19/85 19 2 4 18 2 4 21 t 4 17 t 4 17 t 4 25 t 5 17 t 4 20 t 4 11/19/85-11/26/85 23 2 4 21 t 4 22 1 4 23 t 7 25 i 4 22 t 3 22 t 4 23 t 4 DECEMBER 11/26/85-12/03/85 20 t 4 11 2 4 12 t 4 72 4 15 t 4 13 1 4 16 2 4 17 t 4 12/03/85-12/10/85 24 t 4 19 t 4 (c) 27 1 4 22 t 4 (c) 6t 4 (c) 25 t 4 21 t 4 (c) 21 1 4 12/10/85-12/17/85 26 2 4
( a) (d) 26 t 4 16 t 2 (e) 26 t 4 (e) 22 1 4 26 t 4 (e) 30 t 4 12/17/85-12/24/85 17 t 4 (a) 18 2 4 20 t 4 (f) 21 2 4 (f) 20 1 4 21
- 4 (f) 27 i 4 12/24/85-12/31/85 12 1 4 (10 (g) 17 t 4 14 t 4 (h) 14 1 4 (h) 13 i 4 20 1 5 (h) 15 1 4 Annual Average 18 t 11 17 1 10 17 1 13 17 2 12 17 2 11 17 2 11 17 1 11 17 2 11 2 2 s.d.
( a)
Pump salfunctioned; no sample available.
(b)
See Appendix F (c)
Collection dates are 12/03/85-12/09/85 (d)
Although a sample was recelged, due to low air volume the results are not reported.
(e)
Collection dates are 12/09/85-12/17/85.
(f)
Collection dates are 12/17/85-12/23/85.
(g)
Collection dates are 12/27/85-12/30/85.
(h)
Collection dates are 12/23/85-12/30/85.
(c1) Denotes Control Location
TABLE C-6 (Cont.)
CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA ENITTERS IN AIRBORNE PARTICULATES Results in Units of 10-3 pC1/m3 t 2 sigma LOCATION CODES WELKLY COLLECTION DATES
$N-APT-8A3 SM-APT-8G1 SN-APT-951 SN-APT-10Al SN-APT-IIG1 SN-APT-12Al SN-APT-12D1 SM-APT-12G2 AVENAGE (ct)
(ci)
(ci) t 2 s.a.
JANUARY 01/02/85-01/08/85 19 2 4 19 t 4 17 t 4 19 i 4 21 t 4 16 1 4 16 2 4 19 2 4 18 2 4 01/08/85-01/15/85 16 t 4 15 t 3 16 2 4 18 2 4 15 t 4 15 i 3 16 2 4 15 1 4 16 1 3 01/15/85-01/22/85 24 2 4 21 t 4 22 4
20 t 3 22 t 4 23 2 4 21 2 4 21 2 4 22 2 4 01/22/85-01/29/85 21 t 4 18 t 3 23 t 4 19 i 4 18 2 4 18 t 4 20 t 4 17 2 4 18 t 4 FEBRUARY-01/29/85-02/05/85 21 2 4 20 2 4 18 t 4 21 t 4 20 t 4 21 t 4 17 i 4 18 1 4 21 i 8 02/05/85-02/13/85 16 4
15 t 3 14 2 3 15 t 3 18 2 3 15 t 3 15 t 3 17 2 3 15 t 2 02/13/85-02/19/85 24 t 4 2424 25 2 4
<5 24 t 4 2314 19 1 4 23 1 5 23 1 4 02/19/85-02/26/85 15 t 4 13 2 3 17 t 4 16 2 4 17 1 4 16 t 4 18 2 4 18 i 5 16 2 3 MARCH 02/26/85-03/05/85 12 2 4 13 t 3 12 1 4 13 t 4 15 t 4 14 t 4 15 t 4 17 t 4 14 1 4 03/05/85-03/12/85 23 1 4 19 2 3 18 1 4 23 2 4 22 2 4 22 2 4 20 2 4 24 2 4 22 2 4 03/12/85-03/19/85 11
- 4 13
- 3 11 2 4 14 2 4 15 t 4 13 t 3 10 t 4 13 2 4 13 2 3 03/19/85-03/26/85 17 t 4 18 t 4 15 t 4 13 t 4 17 i 4 15 t 4 16 t 4 17 t 4 16 2 3 03/26/85-04/02/85 12 t 4 15 2 4 11 1 4
<5 10 t 3 10 t 3 15 t 4 20 t 4 12 t 6 APRIL 04/02/85-04/09/85 13 2 4 62 3 11 t 4 11 t 4 81 3 11 t 4 12 t 4 13 t 4 1014 04/09/85-04/16/85 22 2 4 81 3 17 i 4 14 2 4 21 2 4 2514 23 4
23 1 4 21 t 9 04/16/85-04/23/85 17 t 4 11
- 3 18 2 4 19 1 4 20 t 4 17
- 4 22 2 4 18 1 4 18 1 5 04/23/85-04/30/85 8t 3 82 3 92 4 7t 3 81 3 7*3 to t 4 7t 3 8i2 (c1) Denotes Control Location
M M
M M
M TABLE C-6 (Cust.)
CONCENTRAT!ONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE 5 Results in Units of 10-3 pC1/a3 t 2 sigma LOCATION CODES WEEKLY COLLECTION DATES SN-APT-8A3 SN APT-8G1 SN-APT-951 SN-APT-10Al SN-APT-llG1 SN-APT-12Al SN-APT-12D1 SN-APT-12G2 AVEkAGE (ct)
(ci)
(ct) t 2 s.d.
U 04/30/85-05/07/85 10 2 3 20 2 4 14 2 3 14 t 3 13 2 3 12 t 3 16 4
(a) 15 t 6 05/07/85-05/14/85 18 2 4 21 2 4 20 t 4 22 t 4 20 t 4 18 i 3 11 t 3 22 1 3 19 1 8 05/14/85-05/21/85 13 t 3 81 3 12 t 3 12 i 3 11 t 3 12 t 3 12 2 3 13 2 3 12 1 3 05/21/85-05/28/85 16 t 4 15 t 3 13 t 4 17 2 4 15 t 3 13 t 3 16 2 4 12 2 3 15 t 4 JUNE 05/28/85-06/04/85 92 3 18 2 3 92 3 19 t 4 16 t 3 15 t 3 15 2 4 17 t 4 15 2 6 06/04/85-06/11/85 8t 4 10 t 3 13 2 4 11 2 3 92 3 71 3 12 2 4 12 1 4 10 1 3 06/11/85-06/18/85 16 t 4 14 t 3 10 2 3 11 t 3 11 1 3 14 1 3 16 2 4 14 2 3 13 i 3 m
06/18/85-06/25/85 16 1 4 13 t 4 17 2 4 15 2 3 15 t 3 19 2 4 18 1 4 19 2 4 18 1 6 06/25/85-07/02/85 72 3 10 t 3 12 t 3 11 2 3 13 t 3 16 2 3 72 3 11 t 3 10 t 5 JULY 07/02/85-07/09/85 18 1 4 2614 19 1 5 23 t 4 18 i 3 20 1 4 8i3 21 t 4 23 1 18 07/09/85-07/16/85 21 2 4 21 t 4 13 t 4 19 i 4 22 t 4 25 t 4 12 t 3 20 2 4 20 t 7 07/16/85-07/23/85 20 t 4 27 t 4 26 i 4 21 2 4 23 t 4 24 1 4 24 1 4 23 1 4 23 1 b 07/23/85-07/30/85 12 1 4 15 t 4 14 2 4 14 t 4 10 t 3 11 t 4 12 t 3 10 4
12 1 5 AUGUST 07/30/85-08/06/85 10 2 4 10 t 4 9i4 10 t 4 13 t 4 814 12 1 4 92 4 12 i 10 08/06/85-08/13/85 13 2 3 13 t 3 13 2 3 12 t 3 15 t 3 12 1 3 11 1 3 12 1 3 12 1 2 08/13/85-08/20/85 25 t 4 24 t 4 24 t 4 22 t 4 27 t 4 26 t 4 24 2 4 24 t 4 25 t 4 08/20/85-08/27/85 19 t 4 20 t 4 19 i 4 18 1 4 17 t 4 18 t 4 13 2 3 16 1 4 18 t 4 08/27/85-09/03/85 22 t 4 18 2 4 21 2 4 17 2 4 20 1 4 19 2 4 24 1 4 23 2 4 20 t 6 (a)
See Appendix F (ct) Denotes Control Location
M
- M TABLE C-6 (Cont.)
CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of 10-3 pC1/m3 1 2 sigma LOCATION CODES WEEKLY COLLECTION DATES SM-APT-BA3 SN-APT-8G1 SN-APT-951 SN-APT-10Al SN-APT-IIG1 SN-APT-12Al SN-APT-12D1 SN-APT-12G2 AVERAbE (ci)
(c1)
(ct) i2 s.d SEPTEMBER 09/03/85-09/10/85 19 2 4 27 2 4 19 2 4 19 2 4 17 1 4 21 1 4 18 i 4 21 1 4 19 t 5 09/10/85-09/17/85 14 2 4 12 t 4 13 2 4 14 t 4 16 2 4 12 1 4 13 1 3 10 t 3 12 1 4 09/17/85-09/24/85 30 t 4 29 2 4 35 t 4 27 t 4 31 1 4 29 2 4 27 1 4 29 2 4 29 1 8 09/24/85-10/01/85
<10 (b) 10 t 6 1428 12 t 8 15 t 3
<10 (b) 17 t 4 20 4
16 2 7 OCTOBER 10/01/85-10/08/85 31 t 12 (a) 15 t 4
<10 (b) 18 t 9 12 2 3 13 i 4 16 2 4 16 2 4 15 t to 10/08/85-10/15/85 18 2 4 20 t 4 2014 19 t 4 20 t 3 18 1 4 14 2 3 16 2 6 18 i 4 10/15/85-10/22/85 18 t 4 18 t 3 20 t 3 16 2 3 19 t 3 17 1 5 19 2 3 19 1 3 18 1 3 10/22/85-10/29/85 18 t 4 19 2 4 20 1 4 15 t 4 17 t 3 18 2 4 13 t 3 18 1 4 16 1 4 g
NOVEMBER 10/29/85-11/06/85 82 3 71 3 8i3 72 3 8* 3 8t 3
<4 (b) 91 3 81 2 11/06/85-11/12/85 14 t 4 15 t 4 13 i 4 14 1 4 19
- 4 14 1 4 14 i 5 11 1 4 14 2 5 11/12/85-11/19/85 17 t 4 21 1 4 16 t 4 16 t 4 19 i 4 17 i 4 19 i 4 18 2 4 19 1 5 11/19/85-11/26/85 22 t 4 20 t 4 24 1 4 2514 23 i 4 26 2 4 21 i 4 26 2 4 23 1 4 DECEMBER 11/26/85-12/03/85 13 t 4 11 2 4 17 i 4 1614 13 i 3 14 t 4 11 t 4 13 t 4 14 2 6 12/03/85-12/10/85 23 t 5 (c) 20 t 4 (c) 19 t 4 (c) 21 t 4 (c) 24 2 4 20 t 4 (c) 21 t 4 (c) 24 t 4 (c) 21 1 9 12/10/85-12/17/85 32 t 4 (d) 31 t 4 (d) 18 2 4 (d) 26 4 (d) 25 2 4 27 2 4 (d) 28 2 4 (d) 26 2 4 (d) 26 1 9 12/17/85-12/24/85 22 2 5 (e) 17 1 4 (e) 26 i 5 (e) 24 2 5 (e) 22 t 4 24 t 5 (e) 19 1 4 (e) 23 t 5 (e) 21 1 6 12/24/85-12/31/85 20 t 5 (f) 1714 (f) 16 1 4 (f) 16 i 4 (f) 17 t 4 16 i 4 (f) 17 1 4 (f) 18 1 4 (f) 16 1 5 ANNUAL AVERAGE 17 t 12 17 t 12 17 t 11 17 t 9 17 t 10 17 i 11 16 i 9 18 1 10 17 1 1 2 2 s.d.
(a)
Low sample volume.
(b)
See Appendia F (c)
Collection dates are 12/09/Pt-12/17/85 (d)
Collectlen dates are 12/09/85-12/17/85 (e) co11ection dates are 12/17/85-12/23/85 (f)
Collection dates are 12/23/85-12/20/85 (g)
Although a samples was collected, due to low volume the results are not reported.
(c1) Denotes Control Location
E E
E E
TABLE C-7 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS
- IN QUARTERLY AIRBORNE PARTICULATE SAMPLES Results in Units of 10-3 pct /m3 t 2 sigma LOCATION NUCLIDES FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THRID QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER AVERAGE CODES 01/02/84-04/02/85 04/02/85-07/02/85 07/02/85-10/01/85 10/01/85-12/31/85 t 2.s.d.
SM-APT-2A2 8e-7 82.0 t 8.2 96.3 t 9.6 96.5 t 9.7 83.8 i 11.3 89.7 t 15.7 K-40
<10 (10
<10
<30 SM-APT-2A3 Be-7 97.0 t 9.7 91.1 1 9.6 94.4 2 9.4 74.5 t 16.7 89.3
- 20.3 K-40 8.09 t 4.62
<10 (10
<40 8.09 2 4.62
$N-APT-351 Be-7 84.4 t 8.4 93.9 t 9.4 85.6 1 10.6 80.7 t 8.2 86.2 i 11.1 K-40
<10 15.2 2 6.1 23.3 1 8.9 (10 19.3 1 11.5 SM-APT-5D3 Be-7 99.3 1 10.4 85.6 t 11.3 95.1 i 9.5 74.0 t 7.4 88.5 1 22.5 K-40 28.8
- 9.7 (30 13.5 t 7.2
<6 21.1 1 21.6 SM-APT-5F3 Be-7 94.5 t 9.5 79.3 2 8.3 97.1 t 11.7 75.5 t 7.6 8b.b 2 21.6 (ct)
<8 10.2 2 4.7 18.1 1 8.5
<9 14.2 2 11.2 SM-APT-652 Be-7 108.0 t 11 108.0 t 11 88.3 2 8.8 93.2 t 12.7 99.4 t 20.3 K-40
<30
<10 7.95 t 4.29
<20 7.95 t 4.29
- $N-APT-7A2 Be-7 108.0 t 11 92.6 t 12.2 78.3 t 8.3 78.1 1 7.8 89.3 t 28.4 K-40 11.0 t 5.1
<30
<10
<10
,11.0 t 5.1
$N-APT-7B1 Be-7 97.9 2 9.8 87.9 t 8.0 79.2 t 10.9 93.8 t 10.9 89.7 1 16.2 K-40
<6
<9
<40
<30 All other gamma emitters not listed were <LLD; typical LLDs are found on Tables C-19 and C-20.
(ci) Denotes Control Location I
m M
M M
TABLE C-7 (Cont.)
CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTER 5* IN QUARTERLY AIRBORNE PARTICULATE SAMPLES Results in Units of 10-3 pCl/m3 t 2 sigma LOCATION NUCLIDES FIRST QUARTER IECOND QUARTER THRID QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER AVERAGE
- 0 DES 01/02/85-04/02/85 04/02/85-07/02/85 07/?2/85-10/01/85 10/01/85-12/31/85 t 2.s.d.
St. - A P T-8 A 3 Be-7 93.7 2 9.4 95.9 t 9.6 104 t 10 62.3 1 7.5 89.0 2 36.7 K-40
<9 10.1 1 4.7
<10
<30 10.1 t 4.7 SN-APT-8G1 Be-7 112 t 11 66.8 t 6.7 80.% 1 8.6 84.8 t 10.3 86.0 t 37.9 (ci)
<20
<5 (10
<10 SM-APT-951 Be-7 97.6 t 11.2 74.9 i 11.5 98.1 i 11.9 79.5 t 10.2 87.5 i 24.1 g
K-40 (10
<30
<20
<30 SN-APT-10Al Be-7 79.6 t 8.0 95.8 t 14.0 81.9 i 9.5 70.2 t 7.3 81.9 1 21.1 K-40
<8
<30
<10
<10 SN-APT-llG1 Be-7 120 t 12 96.1 2 9.6 98.6 t 11.4 93.1 1 9.3 102.0 t 24.5 (ci)
K-40 22.7 2 6.5
<7 15.5 t 8.7
<20 19.1 t 10.2 SN-APT-12Al Be-7 72.5 t 7.3 105 t 11 102 t 10 79.3 1 7.3 89.7 t 32.4 K-40 13.9 i 5.0
<10
<10
<20 13.9 2 5.0 SN-APT-1201 Be-7 99.4 t 9.9 103 1 12 89.5 t 8.9 85.8 t 10.3 94.4 t 16.2 K-40 (10
<20
<10
<10 SM-APT-12G2 Be-7 86.7
- 8.7 115 t 13 92.2 2 11.1 84.0 t 8.4 94.b i 26.2 (ct)
<10
<10 (20
<20 All other gamma emitters not ilsted were <LLD; typical LLDs are found on Tables C-19 and C-20.
(c1) Denotes Control Location
M-M M
M M
m TABLE C-8 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM-89* AND -90 IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE SAMPLES Results in Units of 10-4 pCl/m3 t 2 sigma FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER LOCATION 01/02/85-04/02/85 04/02/85-07/02/85 07/02/85-10/01/85 10/01/85-12/31/85 CODES Sr-89 Sr-90 Sr-89 Sr-90 Sr-89 Sr-90 Sr-89 Sr-90 SN-APT-2A2
<2 (0.8
<5
<1
<6
<0.9 (4
<0.7
,3
<1
<5
<0.9
<6
<1
<4
<0.9 SM-APT-2A3 SM-APT-351
<3
<0.9
<4 (0.8
<6
<0.8
<4 (0.8 SM-APT-5D3
<3
<0.8
<4
<0.9
<6 (0.8
<3
<0.7 SM-APT-5F3 (c1)
<3
<1 (4
<1
<6
<0.9
<4 (0.7 SN-APT-652
<3
<1
<5
<1
<7
<1
<5
<1 SM-APT-7A2
<3
<0.9
<4
<1
<6
<1 (5
<1 m
SM-APT-781
<3
<1
<5
<1
<10
<1
<4
<1 SM-APT-8A3
<3
<0.9
<5
<1
<6
<1
<5
<0.7 SM-APT-8G1 (ct)
<3
<0.8
<3
<0.8
<10
<1
<5
<0.8 SM-APT-951
<5 (0.8
<8
<1
<6
<1
<6
<0.7 SM-APT-10A1
<3
<1
<4 (0.7
<9
<1
<4
<1 SM-APT-1161 (ct)
<4
<1
<4
<0.9
<6
<0.8
<6
<1 SN-APT-12A1
<3
<1
<6
<1 (8
<l
<6 (0.8 SM-APT-1201
<6
<0.9
<4
<0.8
<5
<1 (4
<0.7 SM-APT-12G2 (c1)
<6
<1
<6
<1
<6
<1
<4
- 4. 410. 5 ( a)
Sr-89 results are corrected for decay to sample stop date.
( a)
The positive Sr-90 was confirmed by dissolving the strontium planchet, separating Y from $r, remounting, and recounting.
(ci) Denotes Control Location i
l
M M
M M
M M
M TABLE C-9 CONCENTRATIONS OF 10 DINE-131 IN AIR CARTRIDGE SAMPLES Results in Units of 10-3 pCl/m3 t 2 sigma LOCATION CODES COLLECTION DATES
$N-A10-2A2 SM-A10-2A3 SN-A10 351 SN-A10-503 SN-A10-5F3 SN-A10-652
$N-A10-7A2 SN-A10-7B1 (ct)
JANUARY 01/02/85-01/08/85
<40
<50
<40
<50
<20
<40
<40
<40 01/08/85-01/15/85
<40
<50
<40
<40
<20
<30
<30
<30 01/15/85-01/22/85
<40
<50
<40
<40
<20
<40
<40
<40 01/22/85-01/29/85 (30
<30 (30
<30
<20
<40
<40
<40 FEBRUARY 01/29/85-02/05/85
<40 (40
<30
<40
<20
<20
<20
<20 02/05/85-02/13/85
<20
<30 (20
<20
<10
<20
<30
<20 02/13/85-02/19/85
<30
<40
<30
<30
<20
<40
<40
<40 02/19/85-02/26/85
<30
<30
<20
<30
<20
<40
<40
<40 MARCH 02/26/85-03/05/85
<30
<30 (30
<30
<20
<30
<30
<20 o.
03/05/85-03/12/85
<40
<40 (30
<40 (20 (20
<20
<20 03/12/85-03/19/85
<30
<30 (30
<30
<20
<30
<30 (20 03/19/85-03/26/85 (40
<50 (30
<40
<20
<40
<40
<30 03/26/85-04/02/85
<30
<30
<30
<30
<20
<40
<40
<30 APRIL 04/02/85-04/09/85
<60
<70
<60
<70
<40
<40
<40
<30 04/09/85-04/16/85 (30
<30 (30
<30
<20
<30
<30 (20 04/16/85-04/23/85 (40
<40 (30
<40
<20
<50
<50
<40 04/23/85-04/30/85 (30
<40 (70
<30
<20 (20
<30 (20 E
04/30/85-05/07/85
<30
<30
<30
<30 (20
<20
<20
<20 05/07/85-05/14/85
<50
<50
<50
<50
<30
<50
<50
<40 05/14/85-05/21/85
<30
<30 (30
<30 (20
<40
<40 (40 05/21/85-05/28/85
<30
<40 (30
<30 (30
<50
<50
<50 JUNE 05/28/85-06/04/85
<30
<30
<30 (30 (20
<40
<50
<40 06/04/85-06/11/85
<40
<40
<40
<40
<20
<40
<50
<30 06/11/85-06/18/85
<30 (30 (30
<30
<20
<30
<30
<30 06/18/85-06/25/85
<40(a)
<40(a)
<30
<30
<30
<30
<40
<30 06/25/85-07/02/85
<50
<50
<50
<50
<30
<30
<30
<30 a)
Collection dates 06/18/85-06/24/85 due to power failure.
cl) Denotes Control Location
m m
M M
M TABLE C-9 (Cont.)
CONCENTRATIONS OF 10 DINE-131 IN AIR CARTRIDGE SAMPLES Results in Units of 10-3 pCl/m3 1 2 sigma LOCATION CODES COLLECTION DATES
$N-AIO-2A2 SN-A10-2A3 SM-AIO-351 SN-A10-503 SN-AID-5F 3 SM-A10-652 5N-A10-7A2 SN-AIO-7B1 (c1)
JULY 07/02/85-07/09/85
<40
<40
<50
<80 (a)
<30
<40
<40
<40 07/09/85-07/16/85
<50
<40 (40
<30
<40
<20
<30
<30 07/16/85-07/23/85
<40
<40
<50
<50
<30
<50
<50
<40 07/23/85-07/30/85 (40
<40
<50
<40
<20
<40
<40
<40 AUGUST 07/30/85-08/06/85
<30
<30
<30
<40
<20
<200 ( a)
<50
<50 08/06/85-08/13/85
<50
<50
<50
<50
<30
<50
<50
<50 08/13/85-08/20/85
<50
<50
<50
<50
<30
<50
<50
<50 08/20/85-08/27/85 (30 (40
<30
<40
<20
<30
<30
<30 08/27/85-09/03/85
<40 (40
<40
<40
<20
<50
<50
<50 SEPTEMBER 09/03/85-09/10/85
<20 (20
<20 (30
<20
<30
<30
<30 09/10/85-09/17/85
<40
<40
'<40
<40
<20
<20
<20
<20 09/17/85-09/24/85
<40
<40
<40
<40
<20
<40
<40
<40 09/24/85-10/01/85 (100 (a)
(100 (a)
<50
<100 ( a)
<30
<40 (100 (a)
<100 (a)
OCTOBER 10/01/85-10/08/85
<70
<80 (a)
(40 (200 (a)
(20
<30
<30 (b) 10/08/85-10/15/85 (40
<40
<40
<40 (20
<40
<40
<80 (a) 10/15/85-10/22/85
<40
<40
<40
<40
<20
<50
<50
<50 10/22/85-10/29/85 (40
<50
<50
<50 (20
<50
<50
<50 NOVEMBER 10/29/85-11/06/85
<30
<30
<30 (30 (20
<40
<40
<40 11/06/85-11/12/85
<50
<50
<50
<50 (20
<50
<50 (50 11/12/85-11/19/85
<50
<50
<50
<50
<20 (60
<50
- <50 11/19/85-11/26/85 (40
<40 (40 (70
<20 (30
<30
<30 OECEMBER 11/26/85-12/03/85
<40
<50
<50
<50 (20
<50
<40
<50 12/03/85-12/10/85
<40
<50
<40
<50
<30
<50
<bo
<50 12/10/85-12/17/85
<40 (c)
<50
<20
<20
<40
<40
<40 12/17/85-12/24/85
<40 (c)
<50
<60
<60
<20
<50
<50 12/24/85-12/31/85
<30
<70
<30
<40
<20
<40
<50
<40 (a)
LLD not met due to low air volume. (See Appendix F)
(b)
Power failure; no sample available. (See Appendix F)
(c)
Electrical malfunction; sample not analyzed.
(ct) Denotes Control Location
M W
TABLE C-9 (Cont.)
CONCENTRATIONS OF 10 DINE-131 IN AIR CARTRIDGE SAMPLES Results in Units of 10-3 pC1/m3 t 2 sigma LOCATION CODES COLLECTION DATES SM-A10-8A3 SM-A10-861 SN-Al0-951 SN-A10-10Al SN-AIO-IIG1 SM-AIO-12Al SN-A10-1201
$N-AIO-12G2 (ct)
(ci)
(ct)
JANUARY 01/02/85-01/08/85
<40 (20
<30
<30
<30
<30
<20
<30 01/08/85-01/15/85 (30
<20 (40
<40
<40
<40
<20
<20 01/15/85-01/22/85
<40
<20 (20
<20
<30
<20
<20
<20 01/22/85-01/29/85
<40
<20
<40
<40
<40
<40
<20
<30 FEBRUARY 01/29/85-02/05/85 (20 (10 (20
<20
<30
<20
<20
<30 02/05/85-02/13/85
.<20
<10
<30
<30
<30
<30
<20
<30 02/13/85-02/19/85
<50
<20
<50
<50
<50
<50
<20
<30 02/19/85-02/26/85 (40
<20
<50
<40
<40
<40
<20
<20 MARCH 02/26/85-03/05/85
<30
<10
<40
<40
<40
<40
<20
<20 03/05/85-03/12/85
<20 (20
<60
<60
<60
<50
<30
<20 03/12/85-03/19/85 (30
<10
<40 (40
<40
<40 (20
<20 m
03/19/85-03/26/85
<40 (20
<20
<20
<20
<20 (20
<20 03/26/85-04/02/85
<40 (20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<io
<30 APRIL 04/02/85-04/09/85 (40 (20 (40
<40
<40
<40
<30
<60 04/09/85-04/16/85
<30
<10
<30 (20
<20
<20
<20 ta) 04/16/85-04/23/85 (40
<20
<40
<40
<40
<40
<20 (20 04/23/85-04/30/85 (20
<10
<30
<30
<30
<30
<20
<20 EAl 04/30/85-05/07/85 (20
<10
<30
<20
<20
<20
<20 (b) 05/07/85-05/14/85
<50
<20
<30
<30
<30
<30
<30 (30 05/14/85-05/21/85
<40 (20
<40
<40
<40
<40
<20
<20 05/21/85-05/28/85
<50 (20
<50
<40
<40
<40
<20
<30 JUNE 05/28/85-06/04/85
<40 '
(20 (30
<30
<30
<30
<20
<30 06/04/85 06/11/85
<60
<40 (20
<20
<20
<20
<30
<20 06/11/85-06/18/85
<30
<20 (30
<30
<30
<30
<20
<30 06/18/85-06/25/85
<40
<20
<50
<50
<50
<50
<30 (20 C6/25/85-07/02/85
<30
<20
<30
<30
<30
<30 (20
<20 (a)
Cannister lost in fleid (See Appendix F).
(b)
Unit malfunction; no sample available (See Appendix F).
(ct) Denotes Control Location 1
M M
T ABLE C-9 (Cont.)
CONCENTRATIONS OF 100lNE-131 IN AIR CARTRIDGE SAMPLES Results in Units of 10-3 pct /m3 t 2 sigma stall 0NS MONTH
$N-A10-8A3 SM-AIO-8GI SM-AIO-951 SN-A10-10Al SN-AIO-llG1 SN-A10-12Al SN-A10-1201 SN-A10-12G2 (ci)
(c1)
(cI)
JULY 07/02/85-07/09/85 (40
<20
<40
<20
<20
<30
<20
<20 07/09/85-07/16/85 (30
<30
<20
<50
<40
<50 (40
<20 07/16/85-07/23/85
<50 (20
<30
<30
<20
<30
<30
<20 07/23/85-07/30/85
<40
<20
<50
<50
<40
<50
<20
<30 AUGUST 07/30/85-08/06/85
' <50
<30
<50
<50
<60
<50 (20
<30 08/06/85-08/13/85
<50
<20
<50
<50
<40
<50 (20
<20 08/13/85-08/20/85
<50
<30
<40
<50
<40
<50
<20
<40 08/20/85-08/27/85 (30 (20
<30
<30
<20
<30 (20
<20 08/27/85-09/03/85
<50 (20
<50
<50 (40
<50 (20
<20 SEPTEMBER 09/03/85-09/10/85
<30 (20 (30
<30
<30
<40
<20
<30 09/10/85-09/17/85 (30
<20
<30
<30
<20
<30 (20
<40 09/17/85-09/24/85
<40 (20
<30
<30
<20
<30 (20
<30 09/24/85-10/01/85 (100 (a)
<50
<100 (a)
<100 (a)
<40
<100 (a)
<20 (20 OCTOBER 10/01/85-10/08/85 (90 (a)
(20
<100 ( a)
(103 (a)
<50 (60
<20
<20 10/08/85-10/15/85
<50 (20
<40
<40
<40
<50
<20
<30 10/15/85-10/22/85
<50
<20 (40 (50
<40
<80 ( a)
<20 (20 10/22/85-10/29/85
<50
<20
<30
<30
<30
<30
<30
<20 NOVEMBER 10/29/85-11/06/85 (40 (20
<40
<40
<40
<40
<20 (20 11/06/85-11/12/85
<50
<20
<30
<30
<30
<30
<30
<20 11/12/85-11/19/85
<50 (30 (30
<30
<30
<30
<30
<20 11/19/85-11/26/85 (40 (20 (20 (20
<20 (20
<20
<30 DECEMBER 11/26/85-12/03/85
<50 (20
<30
<30
<20
<30
<20
<20 12/03/85-12/10/85
<10
<30
<50
<60
<40
<60
<30
<30 12/10/85-12/17/85
<40
<20
<40
<40
<40
<40 (20
<40 12/17/85-12/24/85
<60
<50
<30
<30
<20
<40 (40
<30 12/24/85-12/31/85
<50
<30
<50
<40
<40
<50
<20
<30 (a)
LLO not met due to low sample volume. See LL0s values on Tables C-19 and C-20. ( See Appendix F).
(c1) Denotes Control Location
M WJ M
~
~
l.
TABLE C-10 CGNCLNTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, BETA AND GAMMA EMITTER 5* IN PRECIPITATION Results in Units of pCl/ liter 1 2 sigma i
LOCATION CODE MUCLIDE JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL KAY JUNE 01/01-01/30 02/01-02/27 03/01-03/26 C4/01-04/30 05/01-05/30 05/01-06/25 SM-RWA-951 Gamma (4)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(LLD
<tLD H-3
<100 (100 140 1 70
<100
<100 220 1 80 GR-B (a)
(a)
(a)
(a) 2.8 1 1.4
<3 SM-RWA-12Al Gamma (a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
(LLD (LLD H-3 190 1 80 320 1 70
<100
<100
<100 210 2 60 GR-B (a)
(a)
(a)
( a) 4.2 t 1.5
<3 LOCATION CODE NUCLIDE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 07/01-07/30 08/01-08/26 09/03-09/24 10/02-10/15 11/01-11/26 12/03-12/23 SN-RWA-951 Gamma
<tLD
<LLD
<tLD (a)
<100 160 1 80 (100 150 1 80
<100 (100 GR-B
<3
<1
<2 (a) 2.9 t 1.5 2.6 1 1.2 SM-RWA-12Al Gamma (LLD
<LLD (LLD (a)
(LLD Be-7 110 2 53
- H-3 210 t 80 (100 (90
<200 (b) 190 80
<100 GR-B
<3
<1 4.1 1 1.7 (a)
<2 8.2 t 1.9 All other gamma emitters not listed were <LLD; typical LLDs are f ound in Tables C-19 and C-20.
(a)
Insufficient sample for this analysis.
(b)
Collection dates 10/02/85-10/08/85.
/
TABLE C-11 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131 IN MILK SAMPLES Results in Units of pCl/l 2 2 sigma LULAllUR LUUth COLLECTION DATES
$N-GMK-681
$N-MLK-8G2 SN-GMK-10F 1 (1)
$N-GMK-8F2 (2)
SN-GMK-llc 1 (ct)
(cI)
JANUARY 14, 15, 16 N/A
<0.3 N/A N/A
<0.2 FEBRUARY ll, 12, 13 N/A
<0.2 N/A N/A
<0.3 MARCH 12, 13, 14 N/A
<C.3 N/A
<0.2 N/A APRIL 08, 09, 10
<0.3
<0.2 N/A (0.3
<0.4 MAY 06, 07, 08
<0.3
<0.3
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2 MAY 21, 22
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.2
<0.4 JUNE 04, 05
<0.3
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.4 JUNE 17, 18, 19 (0.2
<0.2
<0.3
<0.3
<0.S JULY 09, 10 (0.3 (0.2
<0.3
<0.4 N/A E
JULY 16, 17
<0.3 (0.3
<0.3
<0.4
<0.5 JULY 30, 31
<0.2
<0.2
<0.3
<0.4
<0.4 AUGUST 13, 14
<0.3
<0.5
<0.5
<0.3
<0.4 AUGUST 26, 27, 28
<0.3 (b)
<0.2
<0.3
<0.2 SEPTEMBER 09, 10, 11
<0.3
<0.2
<0.3
<0.2
<0.3 SEPTEMBER 23, 24, 25 (0.2
<0.2
<0.3
<0.2
<0.4 OCTOBER 01, 02 (c)
<0 2 (c)
<0.1 N/A OCTOBER 12, 13, 15, 16
<0.3
<0.2
<0.4
<0.4 N/A MOVEMBER 08, 12. 13
<0.2 N/A
<0.3
<0.2 N/A DECEMBER 08, 09, 10, 11
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4 N/A GMK = Goat's allk MLK = Cow's allk N/A = Not available (1)
No goat's allk available during winter because of kidding.
(2)
St ation 8F2 did not begin participation in the sampling program until March 1985.
( a)
No sample available (b)
No raw cow milk available c)
No sample available due to hurricane.
c1) Denotes Control Location
M M
M TABLE C-12 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM-89 AND -90 AND GAMMA EMITTERS
- IN MILK SAMPLES Results in Units of pCl/f t 2 sigma COLLECTION DATES NUCLIDE SN-GMK-6B1 SN-MLK-8F2 (2)
SN-MLK-8G2 SN-GMK-10F1 (1)
SN-bMK-llc 1 (ct)
(ct)
JANUARY 14, 15, 16 Sr-89 N/A N/A (4
N/A
<3 Sr-90 N/A N/A 4.5 2 0.9 N/A 2.5 t 0.9 K-40 N/A N/A 1420 t 140 N/A 1790 t 180 Cs-137 N/A N/A
<7 N/A
<5 FEBRUARY ll, 12, 13 Sr-89 N/A N/A (4
N/A
<3 Sr-90 N/A N/A 3.9 i 0.5 N/A 0.86 2 0.23 K-40 N/A N/A 1320 t 130 N/A 1850 t 190 Cs-137 N/A N/A
<6 N/A
<1 MARCH 12, 13, 14 Sr-89 N/A
<3 (4
N/A N/A Sr-90 N/A 2.3 1 0.9 5.8 t 1.0 N/A N/A K-40 N/A 1520 150 1400 t 140 N/A N/A Cs-137 N/A
<5
<4 N/A N/A APRIL 08, 09, 10 Sr-89
<3
<2
<3 N/A
<2 Sr-90 2.1 t 0.7 1.3 t 0.4 9.8 t 1.1 N/A 1.6 2 0.5
.e K-40 1590 t 160 1820 t 180 1300 t 130 N/A 1560 t 160 Cs-137
<5
<7
<7 N/A (6
MAY 06, 07, 08 Sr-89
<2
<2
<3
<2
<2 Sr-90 2.4 1 0.6 2.7 t 0.5 7.4 t 0.5 1.3 t 0.4 1.3 2 0.4 K-40 1590 t 160 1480 t 150 1360 t 140 1590 t 160 1550 t 160 Cs-137
<5
<6
<5
<4
<5 MAY 21, 22 K-40 (a) 1770 t 180 1710 t 170 1290 t 130 1830 t 180 1780 1 180 Cs-137 3.89 t 1.12 4.38 2 2.04 3.72 i 2.10
<1
<3 JUNE 4, 5 K-40 1600 t 160 1950 t 200 1230 t 120 1620 t 160 (b)
<5 (4
(6
<6 JUNE 17, 18, 19 Sr-89
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4 Sr-90 5.3 t 1.0 1.8 2 0.6 8.1 t 0.9 1.8
- 0.6
<1 l
K-40 1830 2 180 2000 t 200 1380 t 140 1690 t 170 1970 1 200 Cs-137
<6 (4
<5
<5
<6 All other gammers not listed were <LLO: typical LLD's are given on Tables C-19 and C-20.
GMK - Goat's milk MLK - Cow's milk N/A Not Available (1)
No goats milk available during the winter because of kidding.
(2)
Station 8F2 did not begin participation in the sampling program until March 1985.
(a)
Strontium analysis was performed on the first sample of the month.
(b)
Gamma analysis inadvertently not completed.
(ct) Denotes Control Location
M TABLE C-12 (Cont.)
CONCENTRATIONS CF STRONTIUM-89 AND -90 AND GAMMA EMITTERS
- IN MILK SAMPLES Results in Units of pCl/l 2 2 sigma COLLECTION DATES NUCLIDE SM-GMK-681 SN-MLK-8F2 SM-MLK-8G2 SN-GMK-10F1 SN-GMK-llc 1 (c1)
(c1)
JULY 09, 10 K-40 (a) 1790 t 180 1860 t 190 1270 t 130 1610 t 160 N/A C5-137
<5 (5
<4 (6
N/A JULY 16, 17 Sr-89
<2
<3
<3
<3
<2 Sr-90 3.9 i 0.6 4.6 2 0.6 11 1 1 5.2 2 0.8 1.7 i 0.5 K-40 1620 t 160 1780 t 180 1150 i 120 1780 t 180 1920 t 190 C5-137
<4 (6
<6 (6
<6 JULY 30, 31 Sr-89
<3
<3
<4
<3 (4
Sr-90 4.9 i 0.6 1.7 t 0.6 10 t 1 1.6
<4
<8
<5
<8 o
AUGUST 13, 14 K-40 1580 t 160 1830
- 180 1050 110 1750 t 170 1770 t 180 Cs-137
<7
<6
<7
<4
<7 AUGUST 26, 27, 28 Sr-89
<2
<2
<3
<3 Sr-90 3.7 t 0.5 1.6 1 0.5 3.0 1 0.8 1.9 1 0.5 K-40 1590 t 160 1830 t 180 (b) 1920 t 190 1650 t 170 Cs-137
<5
<5 (b)
<6
<8 SEPTEMBER 09, 10, 11 K-40 1670 1 170 1160 t 120 1980 t 200 1680 t 170 2030 1 200 Cs-137
<5
<5
<5 (6
<5 SEPTEMBER 23, 24, 25 Sr-89
<3
<2
<4
<3
<2 Sr-90 4.4 1 1.4 1.2 2 0.4 9.4 i 1.2 2.3 1 1.2 1.4 1 K-40 1620 t 160 1870 1 190 1010 t 100 1650 t 160 1870 1 ~0.6 190 Cs-137
<5
<7
<8
<4
<5 All other gamma emitters not listed were <LLD; typical LLD's are given in Tables C-19 and C-20.
(a)
Strontium analysts is normally performed 3n the second sample of month.
(b)
No raw cow milk available.
N/A Not Available (c1) Denotes Control Location
TABLE C-12 (Cont.)
CONCENTR ATIONS OF STRONTIUM-89 AND -90 AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK SAMPLES Results in Units of pC1/f 2 2 sigma COLLECTION DATES NUCLIDE SM-GMK-681 SM-MLK-8F2 SN-MLK-8G2 SM-GMK-10F1 SM-bMK-llc 1 (ct)
(c1)
OCTOBER 01, 02 K-40 N/A 1810 t 180 907 1 91 N/A N/A Cs-137 N/A (6
(7 N/A N/A OCTOBER 12, 13, Sr-89 (4
<2
<3 (4
N/A 15, 16 Sr-90 2.8 1 1.3 2.3 t 0.4 9.6 t 0.7 3.1 2 0.7 N/A K-40 1820 t 180 1710 t 170 997 t 100 1650 t 170 N/A w
<5
<7 (6
<5 MOVEMBER 08, 12, Sr-89
<3 (4
(b)
<3 (a) 13 Sr-90 2.7 t 1.0 3.2 t 0.8 2.5 t 0.6 N/A K-40 1760 2 180 1820 t 180 1650 2170 N/A Cs-137
<5
<5 (6
N/A DECEMBER 09, 10 Sr-89
<2
<1
<3
<3 N/A 11 Sr-90 4.6 2 0.6 2.4 i 0.7 8.2 i 0.7 1.9 1 0.5 N/A K-40 1660 t 170 1960 t 200 1140 t 110 1640 t 160 N/A Cs-137 6.58 t 3.68
<5
<6
<1 N/A All other gamma emitters not 11sted were <lLD; typical LLD's are given on Tables C-19 and C-20.
(a)
No sample available due to hurricane, (b)
Sample not available.
M/A Not Available (c1) Denotes Control Location
M M
M M
D TABLE C-13 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM, 10 DINE-131* AND GAMMA EMITTER 5**
IN POTABLE WATER Results in Units of pC1/ liter i 2 sigma COLLECTION DATLS LOCATION CODE NUCLIDE 03/18/85 06/11/85 09/17/85 12/16/85 SM-PWA-251 Gamma
<LLD (LLD
<100
<100
<100 I-131
<0.2 (0.2 (0.2
<0.1 SN-PWA-6B1 (ci)
Gamma
<LLD (a)
(LLD (b)
<LLD (LLD (c)
H-3 160 1 10
<100
<100 (200 1-131
<0.2
<0.3
<0.2
<0.3 SM-PWA-1352 Gamma (LLD
<tLD
<LLD
<tLD H-3 150 t 70
<100
<100
<100 I-131
<0.2
<0.2 (0.2
<0.3 Iodine-131 results are corrected for decay to sample stop date. Determined by radiochemical analysis.
Gamma emitters not listed were <LLD; typical LLDs are found in Tables C-19 and C-20.
( a)
Collection date 03/20/85 (b)
Collection date 06/12/85 (c)
Collection date 12/19/85 (c1) Denotes Control Location
M M
TABLE C-14 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS
- IN GAME SAMPLES Results in Units of pCl/kg (WET) t 2 sigma LOCATION CODE COLLECTION DATE SAMPLE TYPE K-40 Cs-137 SN-GAX-1252 03/26/85 Raccoon 2510 1 250 1280 2 130 SM-GAX-1452 03/27/85 Squirrel 4340 t 510 4330 t 430 SN-GAX-952 03/31/85 Rabbit
( a)
(a)
U SN-GAX-952 04/01/85 Rabbit (a)
(a)
SM-GAX-1353 10/11/85 Raccoon 2470 t 250 992 1 99 SN-GAX-10Al 12/19/85 Squirrel 3940 t 400 2160 1 220 l
Averag'e t 3315 t 1933 2191 1 3021 i
2 s.d.
All other gamma emitters not ilsted were <LLD: typical LL0s are found in Tables C-19 and C-20.
( a) Sample not available.
e
M M
TABLE C-15 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS
- AND l-131 IN FOOD PRODUCT SAMPLES Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) t 2 sigma LOCATION CODE SAMPLE TYPE COLLECTION OATE K-40 I-131**
Cs-137 SM-FPV-783 SWEET CORN 08/14/85 2330 t 230
<10 (10 SN-FPV-783 TOMATOES 08/14/85 2500 t 250
<6 (9
SN-FPV-783 POTATOES 08/14/85 3010 2 300 (6
<5 SN-FPF-783 PEACHES 08/14/85 1810 t 180
<6
<5 SM-FPL-783 CABBAGE 38/14/85 2230 t 220
<6
<6 SM-FPL-783
- LETTUCE 08/14/85 1580 t 160
<1
<7 SN-FPV-8B1 CARROTS 08/14/85 3460 2 350
<6
<10 SN-FPV-881 SWEET CORN 08/14/85 1750 t 180
<1
<10 5
SM-FPV-881 TOMATOES 08/14/85 2490 t 250
<1 (10 SN-FPV-881 POTATOES 08/14/85 2660 t 270
<5
<7 SM-FPL-881 CABBAGE 08/14/85 2940 t 290
<10
<20 SN-FPL-8BI LETTUCE 08/14/85 1260 1 130
<10
<9 SN-FPF-SC2 STRAWBERRIES 06/13/85 1570 t 160
<5
<10 SN-FPV-5C2 SWEET CORN 08/14/85 2870 1 290
<10
<7 SM-FPV-SC2 TOMATOES 08/14/85 1900 t 190 (8
<5 SM-FPF-SC2 PEACHES 08/14/85 1400 t 140
<10
<10 SM-FPV-SC2 POTATOES 03/14/85 3620 t 360
<6
<6 SN-FPL-SC2 CABBAGE 08/14/85 2010 t 200
<6
<6 SN-FPL-SC2 LETTUCE 08/14/85 1220 t 120
<8
<8 SN-FPV-5C2 CARROTS 08/14/85 (a)
(a)
(a)
All other gamma emitters not listed were <LLO; typical LLd's are given in Tables C-19 and C-20.
l-131 by Radiochemistry
( a) Despite additional sampling efforts, no sample available.
M TABLE C-15 (Cont.)
CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTER $*
AND l-131 IN FOOD PRODUCT SAMPLES Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) 1 2 sigma LOCATION CODE SAMPLE TYPE COLLECTION DATE K-40 1-131**
Cs-137 SM-FPL-5F2 (c1)
LETTUCE 08/20/85 1630 t 160
<7
<10 SM-FPL-5F2 CABBAGE 08/20/85 2690 1 270
<8
<8 SN-FPV-5F7 POTATOES 08/20/85 3020 1 300 (6
<8 SM-FPF-5F2 PEACHES 08/20/85 1560
- 160
<6
<10 SN-FPV-5F2 CARROTS 08/20/85 3590 1 360
<10
<5 SM-FPV-5F2 SWEET CORN 08/20/85 2540 1 250
<6
<10 SM-F PV-5F 2 TOMATOES 08/20/85 2l00 t 210
<7
<10 SN-FPV-12H1 (c1)
CARROTS 08/14/85 3210 320
<7
<10 SM-FPV-12H1 SWEET CORN 08/14/85 2160 t 220
<7 (10 SN-FPV-12H1 TOMATOES 08/14/85 1960 1 200
<10
<8 SN-FPF-12H1 PEACHES 08/14/85 1830 t 180
<6
<7 SM-FPV-12H1 POTATOES 08/14/85 3760
- 380
<6
<9 SN-FPL-12H1 LETTUCE 08/14/85 1660 t 170
<9
<1 SM-FPL-12H1 CABBAGE 08/14/85 (a)
SN-FPF-12H1 STRAWBERRIES 06/14/85 1080
- 110
<4
<6 All other gamma emitters not listed were <LLD; typical LLD's are given in Tables C-19 and C-20.
I-131 by Radiochemistry
( a)
Despite additional sampling efforts, no sample available.
(c1) Denotes Control Location
TABLE C-16 DIRECT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS - QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS mR/ standard month
- LOCATION FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER ANNUAL AVERAGE CODES 01/03/85-04/10/85 04/10/85-07/10/85 07/10/85-10/03/85 10/03/85-01/09/86 t 2 s.d.
SM-IDM-ISI 4.3 t 0.5 3.6 1 0.4 3.3 2 0.4 4.7 t 0.2 4.0 t 1.3 SN-IDM-351 3.6 2 0.1 3.3 1 0.1 2.8 i 0.6 3.7 t 0.2 3.4 t 0.8 SN-IDM-4SI 4.0 t 0.1 3.4 i 0.2 3.6 t 0.7 4.0 2 0.4 3.8 1 0.6 SN-IDH-552 3.9 t 0.1 3.4 1 0.2 3.2 1 0.1 4.2 t 0.3 3.7 i 0.9 SN-IDM-652 4.1 i 0.4 3.3 2 0.2 2.8 1 0.1 4.0 t 0.2 3.b t 1.2 SM-IDM-951 4.1 1 0.3 3.6 1 0.2 3.1 1 0.4 4.0 t 0.1 3.7 i U.9 g
SM-IDM-952 3.9 1 0.1 3.5 1 0.1 3.5 1 0.2 3.7 t 0.1 3.7 2 0.4
$N-IDM-1353 4.3 1 0.1 3.6 i 0.1 3.8 i 0.3 4.1 t 0.1 4.0 2 0.6 SN-IDH-1452 4.1 i 0.6 3.3 1 0.1 3.5 t 0.4 3.6 1 0.3 3.6 1 0.7 SN-IDM-1551 4.1 1 0.1 3.4 2 0.3 3.0 1 0.6 3.7 1 0.3 3.6 i U.9 SN-IDM-1652 5.1 i 2.1 4.1 i 0.2 3.2 t 0.5 3.7 t 0.2 4.0 i 1.6 SM-IDM-2A2 4.5 1 0.6 3.2 1 0.4 3.1 1 0.3 4.4 i 0.2 3.8 1 1.6 SM-IDM-2A3 4.2 1 0.1 3.5 1 0.3 3.0 i 0.3 3.7 t 0.2 3.6 t 1.0 SM-IDM-6Al 5.1 t 0.3 4.6 2 0.3 4.2 t 0.1 5.5 t 0.5 4.9 t 1.1 SM-IDM-7A2 3.8 1 0.4 3.5 t 0.0 3.0 1 0.2 3.6 1 0.2 3.5 t 0.7 SN-IDM-8A3 4.0 t 0.2 3.3 i 0.1 3.3 t 0.6 3.5 1 0.0 3.5 0.1 SM-IDM-10Al 4.0 t 0.2 3.6 1 0.4 3.2 1 0.2 4.2 1 0.2 3.8 1 0.9 SN-IDM-11A1 4.0 0.1 3.2 t 0.2 (a) 3.6 2 0.2 3.6 i U.b SN-IDH-12Al 4.0 i 0.1 3.8 1 0.2 3.9 1 0.5 4.4 i 0.4 4.0 t 0.5 SN-IDH-781 3.9 t 0.2 3.3 i 0.1 3.3 t 0.2 3.6 1 0.4 3.5 1 0.6
- The standard month = 30.4 days.
(a) TLD received damaged; jammed in reader.
TABLE C-16 (Cont.)
DIRECT RA01ATION MEASUREMENTS - QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS mR/ standard month
- LOCATION FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER ANNUAL AVERAGE CODES 01/03/85-04/10/85 04/10/85-07/10/85 07/10/85-10/03/85 10/03/85-01/09/86 1 2 s.d.
SM-IDM-SDI 4.9 0.1 4.5 t 0.2 4.2 i 0.5 5.1 t 0.5 4.7 1 0.8
$N-IDM-5D3 4.6 2 0.3 3.9 i 0.1 3.6 t 0.2 4.4 i 0.1 4.1 i 0.9 SM-IDM-1201 4.2 2 0.2 3.9 1 0.2 4.2 2 0.4 4.4 2 0.2 4.2 0.4 SN-IDM-6El 4.0 2 0.4 3.7 2 0.4 3.3 t 0.4 3.9 2 0.1 3.7 t 0.6 SN-IDM-7El 3.7 t 0.3 3.4 1 0.1 3.0 t 0.1 3.9 i 0.2 3.5 i 0.8 SM-IDM-8El 4.4 t 0.3 3.7 1 0.2 3.4 i 0.4 4.2 1 0.2 3.9 t 0.9 y
$N-IDM-9El 4.2 t 0.5 3.7 1 0.5 3.5 t 0.3 3.9 2 0.1 3.8 1 0.6 SM-IDM-10El 4.3 t 0.5 3.5
- 0.1 3.5 i 0.3 3.9 i 0.2 3.8 t 0.6 SN-IDM-llEl 3.6 t 0.4 3.1 1 0.1 3.4 i 0.6 3.7 t 0.2 3.5 i 0.5 SM-IDM-13El 4.2 1 0.2 3.8 1 0.4 3.6 t 0.9 4.7 i 0.2 4.1 1 1.0 SM-IDM-5F3 (c1) 4.7 i 0.3 4.3 i 0.4 3.8 i 0.3 5.2 t 0.9 4.5 i 1.2 SM-IDM-6G1 (c1) 3.9 t 0.5 3.3 t 0.5 2.7 t 0.1 3.6 i 0.6 3.4 2 1.0 SM-IDM-8G1 (c1) 4.3 1 0.1 3.7 2 0.1 3.6 1 0.2 4.1 i 0.3 3.9 1 0.7 SN-IDH-IlG1 (c1) 3.9 t 0.2 3.4 i 0.2 3.8 t 0.4 4.0 t 0.2 3.8 t 0.5 SN-IDM-12G1 (c1) 3.9 i 0.1 3.3 t 0.2 3.4 t 0.5 3.6 i 0.2 J.6 t 0.5 SM-IDM-12G2 (c1) 4.7 i 0.4 4.1 0.2 4.1 i 0.8 5.0 t 0.7 4.5 t 0.9 Average i 2 s.d.
4.2 i 0.8 3.6 t 0.7 3.4 t 0.8 4.1 i 1.0 3.8 1 0.8 The standard month = 30.4 days.
(c1) Denotes Control Location
TABLE C-17 DIRECT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS - MONTHLY TLD RESULTS mR/ standard month
- LOCATION JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE CODE 01/03-02/06 02/06-03/06 03/06-04/10 04/10-05/01 05/01-06/04 06/04-07/10 SN-IDM-ISI 3.8 i 0.3 4.4 2 0.0 3.9 t 0.2 3.8 i 0.8 5.7
- 3.3 3.3 1 0.3 SN-IDM-351 3.7 i 0.8 3.7 1 0.3 3.4 2 0.1 3.5 t 0.5 3.9 1 0.4 3.4 1 0.1 SN-IDM-4SI 3.9 i 0.6 4.1 t 0.3 3.8 i 0.4 3.6 i 0.5 4.1 t 0.5 3.6 t 0.2 SN-IDM-552 3.8 i 0.2 3.9 t 0.3 3.6 1 0.2 4.1 1 0.7 4.1 1 0.7 3.5 t 0.2 SM-IDM-652 3.4 1 0.7 3.8 i 0.1 3.5 0.2 3.5 1 0.6 3.7 1 0.6 3.5 t 0.3 SN-IDM-951 3.6 1 0.2 4.2 1 0.4 4.1 t 0.4 4.0 t 0.8 3.8 1 0.1 3.7 1 0.1 SN-IDM-952 3.6 t 0.2 4.0 1 0.5 3.5 2 0.1 4.1 1 0.9 4.1 1 0.3 3.6 t 0.3 SN-IDM-1353 3.8 t 0.3 4.0 1 0.1 4.0 1 0.1 3.9 t 0.4 4.0 1 0.2 3.9 t 0.2 SN-IDM-1452 3.3 1 0.4 3.6 1 0.9 3.7 1 0.4 3.4 1 0.1 3.5 t 0.5 3.2 1 0.1 SM-IDM-ISSI 3.5
- 0.4 3.5 t 0.3 3.6 t 0.3 3.6 2 0.3 3.4 t 0.2 3.1 t 0.5 SM-IDM-1652 3.7
- 0.3 3.8 t 0.3 4.0 t 0.2 3.6 i 0.2 3.8 2 0.2 3.2 1 0.3 SN-IDM-2A2 3.6 t 0.7 4.1 1 0.5 3.7 i 0.1 3.4 i 0.5 3.8 2 0.1 3.5 2 0.2 SN-IDM-2A3 4.1 t 0.7 4.2 t 0.4 4.1 i 0.2 4.1 1 1.2 4.2 1 0.6 3.5 t 0.2 SN-IDM-6Al 5.1 t 0.4 5.1 t 0.3 5.2 1 0.4 5.8 1 1.6 5.4 2 0.3 4.9 1 0.4 SM-IDM-7A2 3.6 1 0.4 3.7 1 0.2 3.8 i 0.7 3.7 t 1.0 3.8 t 0.8 3.5 1 0.4 5
SN-IDM-8A3 5.0 f 0.6 3.7
- 0.2 3.7 1 0.5 4.1 t 1.2 4.9 1 0.2 3.6 1 0.4 SM-IDM-10A1 3.7 2 0.4 4.1 t 0.2 3.9 1 0.2 4.0 t 1.0 4.1 1 0.1 3.8 2 0.1 SN-IDM-IIAI 3.6 i 0.3 4.1 t 0.8 3.8 1 0.1 4.0 t 0.2 3.7 1 0.2 3.6 1 0.4 SN-IDM-12Al 3.7 1 0.3 4.4 0.3 4.5 1 0.5 4.6 2 0.6 3.9 2 0.6 4.0 t 0.5 SN-IDM-781 3.9 i 0.8 3.7 1 0.1 3.6 1 0.5 3.7 t 0.7 3.6 1 0.2 3.4 2 0.3 SN-IDM-501 4.2 1 0.4 4.9 1 0.6 6.2 1 0.7 4.8 i 0.7 4.9 t 0.4 4.7 1 0.3 SM-IDM-SD3 4.2 1 0.4 4.310.2 4.2 i 0.2 4.6 i 1.0 4.8 1 0.7 4.1 t 0.2 SN-IDM-12D1 4.3 1 0.9 4.4 1 0.3 4.4 1 0.2 4.1 0.2 4.3 1 0.2 4.0 f 0.5 SN-IDH-6El 3.8 1 0.7 4.0 1 0.7 3.8 1 0.1 3.9 t 1.0 4.1 1 0.2 3.9 i 0.4 SN-IDM-7El 3.5 0.8 3.8 1 0.3 3.5 1 0.2 3.7 0.2 3.8 2 0.3 3.5 t 0.4 SN-IDM-8El 3.8 i 0.1 3.8 1 0.7 4.1 i 0.5 4.0 t 1.2 4.2 1 0.2 3.8 1 0.2 SN-IDM-9El 3.7 i 0.2 4.0 1 0.2 4.2 i 0.1 4.1 1 0.5 4.2 2 0.5 3.9 t 0.2 SN-IDM-10El 4.1 i 1.7 4.2 1 0.2 4.0 1 0.2 4.1 1 0.5 4.0 t 0.2 3.7 2 0.2 SN-IDM-llEl 3.4 t 0.2 3.7 1 0.4 3.2 t 0.1 3.7 t 1.0 3.7 t 0.2 3.1 2 0.3 SN-IDW-13E1 4.2 t 0.3 4.7 1 0.6 4.7 1 0.1 4.3 t 0.1 4.5 t 0.5 4.1 1 0.3 SM-IDM-5F3 I;cli 4.5 1 0.3 4.7 1 0.8 4.5 1 0.5 5.0 t 1.5 5.0 t 0.9 4.3 2 0.5 SN-IDM-6G1 Lc1h 3.2 1 0.2 3.1 1 0.2 3.6 2 0.6 3.5 i 0.4 3.7 1 0.5 3.2 t 0.5 SN-IDM-8G1
[c1;l 3.6 t 0.3 3.8 1 0.1 4.1 1 0.3 4.2 1 1.2 4.1 i 0.4 3.6 t 0.2 SM-IDM-IlG1 I;c1;l 4.7 t 2.2 3.9 1 0.3 3.7 i 0.2 3.9 2 0.4 3.9 2 0.5 3.1 t 0.2 SM-IDH-12G1 I;c1]
3.6 1 0.2 4.0 t 0.3 3.9
- 0.4 4.0 t 0.8 3.7 i 0.0 3.6 1 0.4 SM-IDM-12G2 (cIl 4.1 1 0.2 4.9 1 0.3 4.8 2 0.5 4.4 1 0.4 4.8 t 0.5 4.3 1 0.3 Average i 2 3.9 1.0.9 4.1 1 0.8 4.0 t 1.1 4.0 t 1.0 4.1 1 1.1 3.7 1 0.8 s.d.
The standard month = 30.4 days.
(c1) Denotes Control Location
M M
M i
TABLE C-17 (Cont.)
DIRECT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS - MONTHLY TLD RESULTS l
mR/ standard month
- NMMUML LOCATION JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER AVERAGE CODE 07/10-08/07 08/07-09/04 09/04-10/03 10/03-11/07 11/07-12/11 12/11-01/09 2 2 s.d.
SM-IDM-ISI 3.5 t 0.1 3.9 t 0.2 3.6 t 0.5 4.2 t 0.2 4.0 t 0.4 3.3 1 0.1 4.0 t 1.3 SN-IDH-3SI 3.3 t 0.2 3.6 i 0.3 3.1 2 0.2 3.6 2 0.2 3.6 i 0.5 3.6 t 0.5 3.5 t 0.4 SM-IDM-4SI 3.5 t 0.2 4.0 1 0.3 3.4 i 0.1 4.1 t 0.3 4.0 1 0.2 3.8 t 0.6 3.8 2 0.5 SN-IDH-552 3.3 2 0.2 3.9 1 0.1 3.5 1 0.3 4.1 1 0.3 3.9 t 0.3 3.7 1 0.4 3.8 i 0.5
$N-IDM-652 3.6 i 0.6 3.6 0.5 3.3 t 0.2 3.9 1 0.2 3.9 i 0.6 3.4 2 0.3 3.6 i 0.4 SN-IDM-951 3.7 0.3 3.9 i 0.1 3.4 t 0.0 4.0 1 0.3 4.0 1 0.2 3.6 1 0.2 3.8 t 0.5 SN-IDM-952 J.6 1 0.4 4.0 1 0.3 3.4 t 0.3 4.1 t 0.1 4.0 1 0.3 3.5 1 0.1 J.8 2 0.6 SN-IDM-1353 3.8 1 0.5 4.1 2 0.3 3.7 t 0.3 4.4 1 0.3 4.2 t 0.1 4.1 2 0.5 4.0 t 0.4 SN-IDM-1452 3.2 1 0.1 3.7 1 0.1 3.0 t 0.2 3.5 i 0.4 3.7 t 0.3 3.4 1 0.1 3.4 t 0.5
$N-IDM-1551 3.4 2 0.2 3.7 2 0.1 3.1 t 0.1 3.7 i 0.2 3.9 2 0.7 3.5 1 0.1 3.5 1 0.5
$N-IDM-1652 3.3 i 1.1 5.1 1 0.5 3.3 1 0.2 3.8 1 0.3 4.2 1 0.3 3.9 1 0.5 3.8 t 1.0 SN-IDM-2A2 3.4 2 0.3 3.9 1 0.1 3.5 t 0.2 4.6 t 1.4 4.0 t 0.2 3.7 i 0.1 3.8 i 0.7 SN-IDM-2A3 3.3 i 0.1 3.8 i 0.1 3.5 1 0.2 4.1 1 0.1 4.0 t 1.2 3.4 1 0.3 3.9 i 0.7 SN-IDM-6Al 4.3 t 0.5 5.3 t 0.2 4.7 i 0.2 5.4 1 0.4 5.6 2 0.9 4.6 1 0.4 5.1 i U.9 SM-IDM-7A2 3.5 t 0.1 3.7 1 0.2 3.2 i 0.1 4.0 1 0.0 4.9 1 2.2 3.5 t 0.2 3.7 1 0.8 SN-!DM-8A3 3.0 i 0.4 3.7 2 0.1 3.3 i 0.1 4.0 1 0.5 3.6 i 0.5 3.4 1 0.2 3.8 i 1.2 SN-IDH-10Al 3.4 1 0.1 4.0 t 0.3 3.5 1 0.0 4.3 i 0.5 4.0 1 0.7 3.7 1 0.4 3.9 i 0.5 l
SN-IDM-IIAI 3.6 i 1.0 4.2 t 0.2 3.6 t 0.2 4.3
- 0.7 3.8 1 0.2 3.8 t 0.4 3.8 0.5 SN-IDH-12Al 4.210.8 4.5 t 0.3 4.0 t 0.2 5.5 i 0.5 4.7 1 0.2 4.3 i 0.6 4.4 1 0.9 SN-IDM-7BI 3.1 t 0.7 3.7 i 0.3 3.2 i 0.1 3.6
- 0.2 3.8 t 0.1 3.3 1 0.0 3.5 t 0.5 SM-IDM-5DI 4.2 2 0.2 5.2 1 0.2 4.1 1 0.2 5.1 1 0.3 4.9 i 0.3 4.3 2 0.5 4.8 t 1.2 l
SN-IDM-5D3 4.1 2 0.4 4.8 2 1.0 4.0 i 0.2 4.7 i 0.6 4.4 t 0.4 4.0 t 0.1 4.4 2 0.6 l
SN-IDM-1201 5.1 1 0.2 4.8 2 0.4 3.9 2 0.1 4.7 i 0.2 4.8
- 0.2 4.5 1 0.9 4.4 1 0.7 SM-IDM-6El 3.5 t 0.5 4.1 1 0.4 3.5 2 0.1 4.1 t 0.3 4.5 t 0.9 3.8 i 0.3 3.9 1 0.6 SM-IDM-7El 3.4 t 0.4 3.8 t 0.2 3.3 i 0.1 3.8 t 0.5 3.8
- 0.3 3.3 1 0.3 3.6 i 0.4 l
SN IDM-8El 3.9 i 0.4 4.2 1 0.2 3.8 1 0.1 4.5 t 0.3 4.4 1 0.6 3.7 t 0.3 4.0 1 0.5 SN-IDM-9El 3.9 2 0.2 4.1 1 0.3 3.6 1 0.4 4.3 2 0.1 4.2 2 0.2 3.7 i 0.2 4.0 2 0.5 SN-IDM-10El 3.9 t 0.5 4.2 2 0.3 3.5 1 0.1 4.2 i 0.5 4.1 t 0.4 3.8 t 0.2 4.0 t 0.4 f
SN-IDM-llEl 3.8 i 0.3 3.8 1 0.3 3.2 2 0.1 3.7 t 0.0 4.2
- 0.8 3.8 t 0.5 3.6 2 0.6 SN-IDM-13El 4.4 1 0.1 4.8 2 0.3 3.9 1 0.0 4.5 1 0.1 4.4 t 0.6 4.2 1 0.2 4.4 1 0.5 SN-IDM-5F3 (c1) 4.3 1 0.4 4.7 1 0.1 4.1 1 0.2 4.8 i 0.1 4.8 i 0.7 4.4 1 0.2 4.6 t 0.6 l
SN-IDM-6G1 (ci) 3.5 t 0.6 3.4 2 0.4 3.1 t 0.2 3.7 i 0.7 3.9 1 0.2 3.3 2 0.3 3.5 2 0.5 l
SN-IDM-8GI (cl) 3.7 1 0.7 4.0 t 0.1 3.6 i 0.2 4.1 i 0.3 4.9 i 0.6 3.5 i 0.2 3.9 t 0.8
$N-IDM-IlG1 (ci) 3.8 i 0.4 4.2 1 0.2 3.3 2 0.1 3.8 t 0.4 4.3 i 0.6 4.0 t 0.4 3.9 1 0.7 SN-IDM-12G1 (cI) 3.4 t 0.5 4.1 t 0.3 3.4 2 0.1 3.6 2 0.1 4.1 i 0.8 3.5 1 0.3 3.7 2 0.5 SN-IDM-12G2 (c1) 5.4 t 0.7 5.1 i 0.2 4.310.1 4.9 i 0.4 5.0 t 0.4 4.8 1 0.4 4.7 2 0.8 Average i 3.7 1 1.0 4.2 1 1.0 3.6 i 0.8 4.2 i 1.0 4.2 i 0.9 3.8 1 0.8 4.0 1 0.4 2 s.d.
The standard month = 30.4 days.
(c1) Denotes Control Location 1
E E
TABLE C-18 NOBLE GAS CONCENTRATIONS OF KRYPTON-85 AND XENON-133 IN AIR SAMPLES Results in units of (pC1/m3)
LOCATION CODE - 1452 COLLECTION DATES Kr-85 Xe-133 COLLEC. TION DATES Kr-85 Xe-133 01/02/85-01/09/85 32 2 7
<58 07/02/85-07/09/85 28 t 7
<ll 01/09/85-01/16/85 32 2 7
<64 07/09/85-07/16/85 31 t 7
<75 01/16/85-01/23/85 35 t 6
<57 01/16/85-07/23/85 29 1 7 (67 01/23/85-01/29/85 27 i 7
<58 07/23/85-07/30/85 27 1 7
<59 01/29/85-02/05/85 26 i 7
<74 07/30/85-08/06/85 25 t 7
<12 02/05/85-02/13/85-27 t 7
<50 08/06/85-08/13/85 26 7
<99 02/13/85-02/19/85 32 t 7
<63 08/13/85-08/20/85 28 i 7 (82 02/19/85-02/26/85 28 t 7
<71 08/20/85-08/27/85 30 t 7
<99 02/26/85-03/05/85 26 1 7
<64 08/27/85-09/03/85 34 2 7
<12 03/05/85-03/i2/85 24 1 7
<57 09/03/85-09/10/85 26 1 7
<57 E
03/12/85-03/19/85 36 t 7
<73 09/10/85-09/17/85 30 t 7
<65 03/19/85-03/26/85 40 t 8 (64 09/17/85-09/24/85 27 i 7
<12 03/26/85-04/02/85 33 t 7
<l30 09/24/85-09/28/85 26 i 7
<81 04/02/85-04/09/85 35 t 9
<l51 09/28/85-10/08/85 28 t 7
<63 04/09/85-04/16/85 37 t 5
<93 10/08/85-10/15/85 28 t 7
<68 04/16/85-04/23/85 30 t 7
<129 10/15/85-10/22/85 30 t 7
<18 04/23/85-04/30/85 31 2 7
<84 10/22/85-10/29/85 30 1 7
<65 04/30/85-05/07/85 28 t 7
<73 10/29/85-11/06/85 24 7
<93 05/07/85-05/14/85 (a) 11/06/85-11/12/85 29 2 7 (65 05/14/85-05/21/85 (a) 11/12/85-11/19/85 30 t 7
<63 05/21/85-05/28/85
( a) 11/19/85-11/26/85 39 i 7
<82 05/28/85-06/03/85
( a) 11/26/85-12/03/85 30 t 7
<62 06/03/85-06/11/85 (b)
<180 12/03/85-12/10/85 28 i 7
<b3 06/11/85-06/18/85 33 2 7
<ll 12/10/85-12/19/85 30 t 7
<45 06/18/85-06/25/85 34 t 7 (99 12/19/85-12/24/85 29 i 7
<b5 06/25/85-07/02/85 30 i 7
<ll 12/24/85-12/31/85 29 i 7
<!22 30 t 7 N/A Average i 2 s.d.
( a) Sampler malfunction; no sample available.
(b) Container was inadvertently evacuated before Kr-85 analysis was performed.
N/A Average not calculated for results reported at the LLD.
E E
TABLE C-19 TYPICAL LLDs ACHIEVED FOR GAMMA SPECTROMETRY MILK AND FISH, GAME AND AQUATIC Soll AND AIR WATER AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES PLANTS AQUATIC SEDIMENT PARTILULATES NUCLIDES (pCi/f)
(pCi/kg wet)
(pCi/kg dry)
(pCi/kg dry)
(10-3pCl/m3)
Be-7 60 80 80 200 20 Ma-22 7
8 10 30 2
K-40 100 300 300 900 20 Cr-51 50 100 70 200 10 Mn-54 5
7 9
30 2
Co-58 5
8 8
20 2
Fe-59 15 20 15 50 2
Co-60 5
8 9
20 2
Zn-65 10 20 20 60 2
Zr-95 30 10 10 40 2
3 Mb-95 15 (a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
Mo-99 10 10 10 20 5
Ru-103 7
10 10 30 2
Ru-106 50 60 80 200 10 Ag-llom 7
10 10 40 2
Sb-125 15 20 25 80 4
Te-129m 6
10 10 30 2
1-131 10 10 10 30 10 Te-132 10 6
6 25 2
l l-133 10 10 10 40 15 i
Cs'-134 6
7 10 30 2
Cs-136 10 10 10 30 2
Cs-137 6
7 10 30 2
Ba-140 60 10 10 5
5 La-140 15 (a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
Ce-141 10 10 15 30 3
Ce-144 30 40 60 150 7
Ra-226 90 100 150 400 20 Th-228 10 10 25 60 3
(a) No Tech Spec Requirements.
M TABLE C-20 LLD's AND REPORTING ACTION LEVELS - 1985 REQUIRED BY TECH. SPEC 5. AND CONTRACT SAMPLE Gross TYPE Requirements UNITS Beta H-3 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 2n-b5 Kr-85 Sr-89 ATMOSPHERIC AIRBORNE Air Sample LLD*
Tech S.
pC1/m3 0,01
,0001 LLD Contract 0.01
.0001 -
RAL**
Tech S.
1.0 0.1 RAL Contract 1
U.1 AQUATIC Fish Invertebrate LLD Tech S.
pC1/kg 130 130 260 130 260 5
Algae /
LLD Contract 130 130 260 130 260 5
RAL Tech S.
30,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 20.000 20 RAL Contract 30,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 20 WATERBORNE Potable LLD Tech S.
pC1/f 4
3,000 15 15 30 15 30 10 Surface LLO Contract 4
200 15 15 30 15 30 10 Precip.
RAL Tech S.
50 30,000 1,000 1,000 400 300 300 20 RAL Contract 50 20,000 1,000 1,000 400 300 300 20 TERRESTRIAL Food LLD Tech S.
pC1/kg Products LLD Contract (wet)
RAL Tech S.
RAL Contract MILK Milk LLD Tech S.
pC1/2 5
LLD Contract 5
RAL Tech S.
20 RAL Contract 20 Sediments LLD Tech 5, pC1/kg 5
Soils LLD Contract (dry) 50 50 5
RAL Tech S.
200 80 RAL Contract 30,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 80 NOBLE GAS LLD Tech S.
pC1/m3 25 LLD Contract 15 RAL lech S.
100 RAL Contract 100 DIRECT LLD Tech S.
RA01AT10N LLD Contract 1.5 mR/std. month ILU
- Lower limit of detection Reporting action level
M a
TABLE C-20 (Cont.)
LLD's AND REPORTING ACTION LEVELS - 1985 REQUIRED BY TECH. SPECS. AND CONTRACT SAMPLE TYPE UNITS Sr-90 Zr-95 Nb-95 I-131 Xe-133 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 WATER Potable LLD*
Tech S.
pC1/2 2
30 15 0.5 15 18 60 15 Surface LLD Contract 2
10 10 0.5 15 15 15 15 Precip.
RAL**
Tech S.
20 400 400 2
30 50 200 200 RAL Contract 8
400 400 2
30 50 200 200 AIR ATr Sample LLD Tech S.
pC1/m3
.0001
.07
.05
.06 LLD Contract
.0001
.01
.05
.06 RAL Tech S.
0.1 0.9 10 20 RAL Contract 0.1 0.9 10 20 MILK Milk LLD Tech S.
pC1/f 1
0.5 15 18 60 15 LLD Contract 1
0.5 15 15 15 15 RAL Tech S.
10 3
60 70 300 300 RAL Contract 8
3 60 70 300 300 co AQUATIC Fish Invertebrate LLD Tech S.
pCi/kg 5
130 150 Algae /
LLD Contract 5
80 80 130 130 Game RAL Tech S.
20 1,000 2,000 RAL Contract 8
1,000 2,000 FOOD Food LLD Tech S.
pC1/kg 60 60 80 Products LLD Contract (wet) 60 60 60 RAL Tech S.
100 1,000 2,000 RAL Contract 100 1,000 2,000 SEDIMENTS /S0ILS Sediments LLD Tech S.
pC1/kg 5
150 180 Soils LLD Contract (dry) 5 50 50 150 150 RAL Tech S.
80 1,000 2,000 RAL Contract 80 1,000 2.000 NOBLE GAS LLD Tech S.
pC1/m3 100 LLD Contract RAL Tech S.
100 RAL Contract
- Lower 11mit of detection Reporting action level
j i
APPEf1 DIX D ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES SYNOPSIS I
I I
I
ANALYTICAL FROCEDUEES SYNOPEIS Appendi D is a synopsis of the analytical procedures performed ca samples collected for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Etaticn's Radiological Environmental Monitoring Frogram.
ANALYSIS TITLE PAGE G-oss Beta Analys:s of Samples.............-...................
86 Wate..................................................... 86 Airborne Farticulates.....................................
87 Analysis of Samples for Tritium................................
83 Water.....................................................
88 Analysis of Samples for Stro7 tium-89 and -90...................
87 Water.....................................................
89 Mi1k......................................................
89 Soil and Sediment.........................................
89 Organic Solids............................................
90 Airborne Particulates.....................................
90 Analysis of Samples fer Iodine-131....................e........
92 Milk or Water.............................................
92 Gamma Spectrometry of Samples..................................
93 MilkandWater............................................93 l
l i W Dried Solids other than Soils and Sediment................
93 Fish......................................................
93 Soils and Sediments.......................................
93 Charcoal Cartridges (Airborne Iodine).....................
93 Airborne Particulates.....................................
93 Environmental Dosimetry........................................
95 85
GROSE EETf, ANALYSES OF E AMPi_ E S WATER 1.0 Introduction The procedures described in this section are used to measu e the overall radioactisity of water sac.ples without i den t i f yi nc the radioactive species present.
No chemical separation techniques are involved.
One liter of the sample is evaporated on a hot plate.
A smaller volume may be used if the sample has a sig7ificant salt conte 7t as I
measured by a conductivity meter.
If requested by the customer, the sample is filtered through No.
54 filter paper before evaporation, removing particles greater thar 30 microns in size.
After esaporating to a small vol ume in a beaker, the sample is rinsed into a 2-inch diameter stainless steel planchet which is stamped.si th a concentric ring pattern to distribute residue evenly.
Final evaporation to dryness tal es place under heat lamps.
Residue mass is determined by weighing the planchet befcre and aftcr mounting the sample.
The planchet is counted for beta activity on e r.
automatic proportional ccunter.
F.esul t s are calculated using empirical self-absorption curses which allow for the change in effective counting efficiency caused by the residue mass.
2.0 Detection Capability Detec t i on capability depends upon the sample volume actually represented on the planchet, the background and the efficiercy of the counting instrument, and upon self-absorption of beta particles by the mounted sample.
Because the radioactive species are not identified, no decay corrections are made and the reported activity refers to the counting time.
The minimum detectable level (MDL) for water samples is nomina:ly 1.6 picocuries per lite-for gross beta at the 4.66 sigma level (1.0 pci/
at the 2.83 sigma level), assuming that 1 liter of sample is used ar.d that 1/2 gram of sample residue is moanted on the planchet.
These figures are based upon a coanting time of 50 minutes and upo, representative values of counting efficiency and background of 0.2 and 1.2 cpm, r especti vel y.
The MDL becomes significantly lower as the mount weight decreases because of reduced self-absorption.
At a cero mount weight, the d.66 sigma MDL for gross beta is 0.9 picccuries per liter.
This value reflects a beta counting efficiency of 0.38.
86
Airborne Particulates After a delay of five or more days, allowing for the radon-222 a n c' radon-220 (thcron) daughter prod _icts to decay, the filters are :cuated in a gas-flow proportional counter.
An unused airborr.e particulate filter, supplied by LILCO, is counted as the blank.
Calculations of the results, the two sigma error and the lower limit o# detection (LLD).
((E/T) - (B/t) ) / (2. 22 V E)
RESULT (pCi /m3 )
=
TWO SIGMA ERROF (pCi/m3) 2((S/T2) + (B/t2))se2/(2.22 V E)
=
LLD 'pCi/m3) 4.66 (B1'2)/(2.22 V E t)
=
where:
Gross counts of sample including blank S
=
I Counts of blank B
=
Counting efficiency E
=
Number of minutes sample was cotnted T
=
Number of minutes blant was counted t
=
Sample ali quot size (cubic meters)
V
=
I e7
ANALvSIS OF sat 1PLES FOR TR: TIUM Weter Appro.:imately 2 ml of water are con /erted to hycrcgen by passing the water, heated to its vapor state, ove-a g r ar.u l a r zinc consersior.
column heated to 400 degrees C.
The hydrogen is loaded into a cne liter propo-tional detector and tne va l ue. e i s deternir.ed by recorcing the pressure.
The proportional detector is passively shielded by lead and steel and an electronic, anticoincidence system provider add i t i or. a1 shielding from cosmic rays.
Calculation of the results, the two sigma error and the lower limit detectien (LLD) in pCi/
RESULT
= 3.234 TuVu(Co - B)/(Cu Vs)
TWO SIGMA ERROR 2((Co + B) t)1'23.234 Tu Vu/((Cu Ve)'Co-E))
=
4.66 (3.234)Tu Vu(Co)2' /C t Cu Vo)
=
I where:
Tu tritium units of the standard
=
conversion factor changing tritium 3.234
=
units to pCi/
C Vu volume of the standard used to calibrate the
=
efficiency of the cetector in psia Ve volume of the semple loaded into the detector
=
in psia Cu the cpm activity cf the standard of volute Vu
=
Co the gross activity in cpm of the sample of
=
volume Va and the detector volume E
the background of the detectcr in cpm
=
t counting time for the sample
=
88
ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FOR STRONTIUM-89 AND -90 Water Stable strontium carrier is addec to 1 liter of sample and the volume is reduced by evaporation.
Strontium is precipitated as 3r(NO3 ) t.
using nitric acid.
A barium scavenge and an iron (f erric hydroxide) scavenge are performed followed by addition of stable yttrium carrier and a5 to 7 day period for yttrium ingrowth.
Yttrium is
- the, precipitated as hydroxide, is dissolved and re precipitated as oxalate. The yttrium oxal ate is mounted on a nylon planchet and is counted in a low level beta counter to infer 3r-90 ac ti vi ty.
Strontium-89 activity is determined by precipitating SrCOs from the sample after yttrium separation.
This precipitate is mcunted on a
nylon planchet and is covered with an 80 mg/cm2 al umi nua absorber fcr icw level beta counting.
M:1k Stable strontium carrier is added to 1 liter of sample and trichloracetic acid (TCA) is added to produce a curd.
The cu-d is separated by filtration and is discarded.
An oxalate pr eci p i t a ti on is performed on the filtrate and the precipitate is ashed in a muffle furnace.
The ash is dissolved and strontium is precipi tated as SrNO 3
using fuming (90%) nitric acid.
A barium chromate scavenge and an iron (f erric hydroxide) scavenge are then performed.
Stable yttrian carrier is added and the sample is allowed to stand for 7 to 10 days for yttrium ingrowtn.
Yttrium is then precipitated as hydroxide, is dissclved and re-precipitated as ox al ate.
The yttrium o::a l at e is mounted on a nylon planchet and is counted in a low level beta counter to infer Sr-90 activity.
Strontium-89 is determined by precipitating SrCOs from the sample after yttrium separation.
This precipitate is mounted on a nylon planchet and is covered with an 80 mg/cm2 aluminun absorber for low level beta c ou r. t i n g.
Soil and Sediment The sample is first dried under heat lamps and a 10 gran aliquot is taken.
Stable strontium carrier is added and the sample is leached in nitric acid.
The mixture is filtered and the li qui d portion is reduced in volume by evaporation.
Strontium is precipitated as Sr(NO3)2 using fuming (90%) nitric acid.
A barium chromete scavenge and an iron (f erric hydroxide) scavenge are then performed.
Stable j g yttrium carrier is added and the sample is allowed to stand for 7 to g
10 days for yttrium ingrowth.
Yttrium is then precipitated as hydroxide, is dissolved and re precipitated as oxa1. ate.
The yttrium oxalate is mounted on a nylon planchet and is counted in a low level beta counter to infer Sr-90 activity.
Strontium-89 activity is i
determined by precipitating SrCOs from the sample after yttrium separaticn.
This precipitate is mounted on a nylon planchet and is covered with an 80 mg/cm2 aluminum absorber for low level beta I
counting.
89
Organic Solics A 2OOg wet portion of the sample is dried and then ashed in a muffle I
furnace.
Stable strentium carrier is added and the ash is leached in nitric acid.
The sample is filtered anc the volume is reduced by evaporation.
Strontium is precipitated as Sr(NO3)2 using fuming ( 9 0 7.-
nitric acid.
An iron (f erric hydroxide) scavenge is performed.
follcwed by additien of stable yttrium carrier and a 7 to 13 dei period for yttrium ingrowth.
Yttrium is the.,
precipitatd at hydecxide, is dissol ved and re precipitated as oxalate.
The yttriun onalate is mounted on a nylon planchet and is counted in a low level beta counter to infer strontium-90 activity.
Strontium-89 activity is determined by p-ecipitating SrCOs from the sample after yttrium separation.
This precipitate is mounted on a nylon planchet and it covered with an 80 mg/cm aluminum absorber for low level beta 2
counting.
Airborne Particulates Stable strontium carrier is added to the sample and it is leached ir nitric acid to bring deposits into solution.
The mixture is then filtered and the filtrate is reduced in volume by evaporation.
Strontium is precipitated as Sr(NOs)2 using fuming (90%) nitric acio.
An iron (f erric hydroxide) scavenge is performed, followed by addition of stable yttrium carrier and a 7 to 10 day period for yttrium ingrowth.
Yttrium is then precipitated as hydroxide, is dissolved and re precipitated as oxalate.
The yttrium oxalate is meunted on a nylon planchet and is counted in a low level beta counter to infer strontium-90 activity.
Strontium-89 activity is determined by precipitating SrCOs from the sample after yttrium separation.
Th'.s precipitate is mounted on a nylon planchet and is covered with GO mg/cm aluminum absorber for level beta counting.
2 Calculations of the results, two sigma errors and lower limits of detection (LLD) are expressed in activity of pCi/ volume or pCi / mass:
RESULT Sr-89 (N/ A t-Bc-Bn) / (2. 22 V Ye DFen-e,Een-e,)
=
TWO SIGMA ERROR Sr-89
= 2((N/4 t+Be+Bn)/ dt)2'2/(2.22 V Ye DFen-o,Een-a,)
4.66((Be+Bn)/4 t)se2/(2.22 V Ye DFen-o,Een-e,)
LLD Sr-80
=
(N/d t - B)/(2.22 V Y Y
DF IF E)
RESULT Sr-90
=
i 2
TWO SIGMA 2((N/zht+B)/Jit)se2/(2.22 V Y Y
DF E IF))
ERROR Sr-90
=
3 2
4.66(B/4 t:,i 2/(2.22 V Y LLD Sr-90 i Y2 IF DF E)
=
90
where:
total counts from sample (counts)
N
=
coanting time for sample (min) 41 t
=
background rate of counter (cpm) using absorber Bc
=
configuration dpm/pCi 2.22
=
volume or weight of sample ana.lyzed V
=
background addition from Sr-90 and ingrcwth of Y-90 Bn
=
0.016 ( V. ) + (K) Ev.o.)
(IGv-,o)
Bn
=
chemical yield of stron ti um Ye
=
decay factor from the mid collectio., date to the cour ting DFan-o,
=
date for SR-89 efficiency of the counte-for SR-89 with the 80 mg/:n.sq.
Een-e,
=
aluminum absorber (N/A t - Bc)v-,o/(Ev-,oDFv-,oY2)
K
=
the decay factor for Y-90 frcm the " mi l k time to the DFv-,o
=
mid count time efficiency of the counter for Y-90 Ev-,o
=
ingrowth factor for Y-90 f rom scavenge tin e to mil t irg time IFv-,o
=
the ingrowth factor for Y-90 into the strontium mount IGv-,o
=
from the " milk" time to the mid count time.
the efficiency of measuring SR-90 through a No. 6 absorber 0.016
=
the efficiency of counting Y-90 through a No. 6 absarte-Eve..
=
background rate of counter (cpm)
B
=
chemical yield of yttrium Ya
=
chemical yield of strontium Y2
=
t decay factor of yttrium from the milking time to DF
=
the mid count time efficiency of the counter for Y-90 E
=
ingrowth factor for Y-90 from scavenge time to milking time IF
=
91
ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FOR I OD IllE -131 Mill or Water Two liters of sample are first equilibrated with stable. iodide carrier.
A batch treatment with amicn exchange r esin is used ic remove iodine f rom the sample, The iodine is then stripped from the resin with sodium hypochlorite sclutior., is reduced with hydroxylamine hydrochloride and is e:: t r a c ted into carbon tetrachloride as free lodine.
It is then back-extracted as iodide into sodium bisulfite solution and is precipitated as palladium iodide.
The precipitate is weighed for chemical yield and is mounted on a nylon plenchet fo-law level beta counting.
The chemical yield is corrected by measuring thc stable iodide content of the mi ll.
or the water with a specific i or, electrode.
Calculations of results, two sigma error and the lower limit of detection (LLD) in pCi /Ms:
(N/eit-B)/(2.22 E V Y DF)
RESULT
=
TWO SIGMA 2((N//it+D)/
t)se2(2.22 E V Y DF)
ERROR
=
4.66(B/Zit):<2/(2.22 E V Y DF)
=
where:
total counts from sample (counts)
N
=
counting time for sample (min) t
=
background rate of counter (cpm)
B
=
dpm/pCi 2.22
=
volume or weight of sample analyzed V
=
chemical yield of the mount or sample coanted Y
=
decay factor from the collection to the counting date DF
=
efficiency of the counter for I-131, corrected for E
=
self absorption effects by the formula E.(exp-0.OO61M)/fexp-0.OO61M.)
E
=
efficiency of the counter determined from an E.
=
I-131 standard mount mass of PdI 2 on the standard mount, mg M.
=
mass of PdI2 on the sample mount, mg M
=
W
GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF SAMPLES Milk and Water A 1.0 liter Marinelli beaker is filled with a representative aliquo of the sample.
The sample is then counted for approximately 100C minutes with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a mini-computer-based data acquisition system which performs pulse height anal yssi s.
Dried Solids Other Than Soils and Sediments A large quantity of the sample is dried at a low temperature, less than 100 degrees C.
As much as possible (up to the total sanp l c. )
is loaded into a tared 1-liter Marinelli and weighed.
The sample is then counted for approximately 1000 minutes with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a mini-computer-based data acquisiti on system which performs pulse height anal ysi s.
Fish As much as possible (up to the total sample) of the edible portion of the sample is loaded into a tared Marinelli and weighed.
The sample is then counted for approximately 1000 mi nutes wi th a shi el ded G.e (Li )
detector coupled to a mini-computer-based data acquisition system which performs pulse height analysis.
Soils and Sediments Soils and sediments are dried to a low temperature, less than 100 degrees C.
The soil or sediment is loaded fully into a
- tared, standard 300 cc container and weighed.
The sample is then counted for appro::Imatel y six hours with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a
mini-computer-based data acquisition system which performs pulse height analysis.
Charcoal Cartridges (Airborne Iodine)
Charcoal cartridges are counted up to five at a time, with one positioned on the face of a Ge(Li) detector and up to fcur on the side of the Ge(Li) detector.
Each Ge(Li) detectcr is calibrated for both positions.
The detection limit for I-131 of each charcoal cartridge can be determined (assuming no positive I-131) uni quel y f rom the volume of air which passed through it.
In the event I-131 is cbserved in the initial counting of a set, each charcoal cartridge is then counted separately, positiored on the faca of the cetector.
Airborne Particulate The four or five (depending on the calendar month) airborne particulate filters fo-a monthly composite for each field station ae aligned one in front of another and then counted for approximately si:
hours with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a mini-computer-based data acquisition system which performs pulse height analysis.
93
I A mini-computer software program defines peal s by certain changts in the slope cf the spectrum.
The program alsc compares the energ', of each peak with a library of peaks f or isotope identification and then I
performs the radioactivity cal cul ati on using the appropri ate fractional gamma ray abundance, half life, detector efficiency, and net counts in the peak region.
The calculation of results, two sigma error and the lower limit of detection (LLD) in pCi/ volume cr pCi/ mass:
RESULT (S-B)/(2.22 t E V F)
=
TWO SIGMA ERROR 2(S+B)1'2/(2.22 t E V F)
=
4.66(B)1'2/(2.22 t E V F)
=
where:
Area, in counts, of sample peak and background (region S
=
of spectrun of irterest' E
Background area, in counts, under sample peak.
=
determined by a linear interpelation of the representative backgrounds on either side of the peck length of time in minutes the sample was counted t
=
2.22 dpm/pCi
=
detector efficiency for energy of inte-est and geometry E
=
of sample sanple aliquot size (l i ters, cubic meters, filograms3 or V
=
grams)
F Fractional gamma abundance (specific for each emitted
=
gamma)
I 94
ENVIRONMENTAL EOSIVETRY Teledyne Isotopes uses a CaSO4: Dy thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) which the ccTpany manufactures.
This material has a high light oatput, negligible thermal l y 2nduced signal loss (f ading),
and negligible self dosing.
The energy response cu ve (as well as a 7.1 other features) satisfies NFC Reg. Guide 4.13.
Tr an si t doses are acccunted for by use of separate TLDr.
Following the, field exposure period the TLDs are placed in a Teledyne Isotopes Model 8300.
One fourth' of the rectar gul ar TLD i s heated at a time and the' measured light emissicn (luminescence: is recorded.
The TLD is then annealed and exposed to a known Cs-137 dese; each area is then read again.
This provides a calibration of ecch area of each TLD after every field use.
The transit controls ar e read in the same canner.
Calculations of results and the two sigma error in net milliroentgen (mR):
D=
(D +D2+Ds+D.)/4 RESULT
=
2 TWO SIGMA 2((Di-D)2+(D -D)2+(9,_p)2+(D.-D)2)/3)se2 ERROR
=
2 where:
the net mR of area 1 of the TLD, and similarly f or D D
=
2, Ds, and D.
Di In K/Rs
-A
=
the instrument reading'of the field dose in area 1 In
=
the known exposure by the Cs-137 source K
=
the instrument reading due to the Cs-137 dose on area 1 R
=
i average dose in mR, calculated in similar manne-as A
=
l j
above, of the transit co, trol TLCs l
l l
95 i
+4 APPENDIX E l
SUMMARY
OF EPA INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS 1
l 96
I US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM 1985 Collection Tel ed yr.e Date Media Nuclide EPA-Results(a)
Isotopes Resul te (b) j 01/04 Water Sr-89 3.0 1 5.
L.T.
3.
Sr-90 30.
1.5 29.0 4.
01/11 Water Pu-239 15.7 1.6 19.
i 1.
01/18 Later Gross Alpha 5.0 5.0 5.
1 O.
Gross Beta 15.0 5.0 15.0 1
1.
01/25 Food (c)
Sr-89 34.0 5.0 17.0 0.00 Sr-90 26.0 i 1.5 22.0 1 2.00 I-131 35.0 i 6.0 26.3 2.08 Cs-137 29.0 i 5.0 31.0 3.46 K
1382.0 1 120.0 1393.0 1 32.14 02/02 Water H-3 3796.
i 366.
3933.
i 58.
02/08 Water Cr-51 48.
1 5.
L.T.
57.
Co-60 20.
1 5.
19.0 1
2.
Zn-65 55.
1 5.
57.
1 2.
Ru-106 25.
5.
L.T.
40.
Cs-134 35.
5.
37.0 4.
Cs-137 25.
1 5.
31.
1 2.
02/22 Water Uranium 12.0 1 6.
12.0 1
1.
03/01 Milk I-131 9.
i O.9 8.0 i
1.
03/15 Water Ra-226 5.0 0.75 5.9 0.7 Ra-228 9.0 1 1.35 5.1 i
O.6 (d) 03/29 Air Filter Gross Alpha 10.0 i 5.0 10.33 i O.58 Gross Beta 36.
5.0 36.66 1 2.51 I
Sr-90 15.0 1.5 14.66 i O.58 Cs-137 6.0 1 5.0 6.0 i
O.0 04/05 Water I-131 7.5 i O.8 6.67 i O.58 04/12 Water H-3 3559.0 364.
3367.0 1 321.
04/19 Water Gross Alpha 32.0 1 5.0 25.33 0.58(e)
(Sample A)
Ra-226 4.1 0.6 3.66 0.3 Ra-228 6.2 i O.9 6.13 i O.23 U
7.0 1 6.0 6.67 i O.58 97
- l l
i US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM 1985 Col l ec ti on Teledyne Date Media Nuclide EPA-Results(a)
Isotones Results(5) 04/19 Water Gross Beta 72.0 1 5.0 92.33 i
- 3. 21 ( f )
(Sample B)
Sr-89' 10.0 1
- 5. 0 10.0 0.0 Er-90 15.0 1 1.5 13.33 i 1.15 Co-60 15.0 1 5.0 20.0 1
1.73 Cs-134 15.0 1 5.0 14.66 i 1.15 Cs-137 12.0 1 5.0 16.33 !
3.21 04/26 Urine H-3 3056.
i 359.
2S33.
i 115.
05/10 Water Sr-89 39.0 1 5.0 35.65 1 3.05 Sr-90 15.
1.5 12.66 i O.58(g) 05/24 Water Gross Alpha 12.0 5.0 12.0 1.73 Gross Eeta 11.0 1 5.0 12.66 i O.59 06/07 Water Cr-51 44.0 5.0 L.T.
53.3 Co-60 14.0 1 5.0 15.66 i 1.15 Zn-65 47.0 1 5.0 43.33 2.51 Ru-106 62.0 5.0 53.67 1 3.21(h)
Cs-134 35.0 1 5.0 33.0 4.36 Cs-137 20.0 1 5.0 23.33 1 2.03 06/14 Water H-3 2416.0 1 351.0 2366.66 1 115.46 06/21 Water Ra-226 3.1 i O.4 3.86 i O. 06 (i )
Ra-228 4.2 i O.6 3.66 i O.67 06/28 Milk Sr-89 11.0 1 5.0 11.66 1.15 Sr-90 11.0 i 1.5 10.00 i O.0 I-131 11.0 i 6.0 9.00 i 1.0 Cs-137 11.0 5.0 11.0 1
2.64 K
1525.0 1 76.00 1540.0 1 34.64 07/05 Urine H-3 2444.0 352.
2066.66 1 208.16 07/13 Water Pu-239 10.6 11.1 8.20
- 0. 72 (j )
07/19 Water Gross Alpha 11.0 1 5.0 5.67 i O.5S Gross Beta 8.0 5.0 4.33 i O.58 07/26 Food Sr-89 33.0 5.0 25.33 1 2.00(k)
(c)
Sr-90 26.0 1 1.5 28.33 i 1.52(k)
I-131 35.0 6.0 37.33 1 1.52 Cs-137 29.0 1 5.0 31.00 i 1.00 K
1514.0 1 76.00 1633.33 51.32(1) 98 ll 1
I l
I US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM 1985 Col l ec ti on Teledync Date Media Nuclide EPA-Results(a)
Isotores Fesults(bi 08/09 Water I-131 30.0 6.00 36.66 1 1.52 08/16 Water H-3 4480.0 1 448.0 4433.3 152.75 08/23 Water U
4.0 6.00 4.33 i O.5E 08/30 Air Filter Gross Alpha 13.0 5.00 12.66 i O.58 Gross Beta 44.0 1 5.00 43.00 1 3.00 Sr-90 18.0 1 1.50 20.00 1 1.OO(m)
Cs-137 8.0 5.00 10.00 i 1.00 09/06 Water Sr-89 20.0 1 5.00 18.33 1 1.52 Sr-90 7.0 1 1.50 6.00 i O.O 09/13 Water Ra-226 8.9 1 1.34 9.23 i O.49 Ra-228 4.6 0.69 4.03 i O.20 09/20 Water Gross Alpha 6.0 i 5.00 3.33 i O.58 Gross Beta 8.0 1 5.00 4.00 i O.0 I
10/04 Water Cr-51 21.0 1 5.00 L.T.
63.
Cr-60 20.0 1 5.00 17.66 1 3.21 Zn-65 19.0 1 5.00 25.33 1 2.51(n)
Ru-106 20.0 1 5.00 L.T.
37.
Cs-134 20.O i 5.00 18.33 1 3.05 Cs-137 20.0 i 5.00 22.33 1.15 10/11 Water H-3 1974.0 345.0 2133.33 208.16 NOTES:
(a)
EPA Results-Expected laboratory precision (1 sigma).
Units a e pCi/
for water, urine, and milk except K is in mg/.2,.
Units are total pCi for air particulate filters.
(b)
Teledyne Results - Average i one sigma.
Units are pCi/2 fer water, urine, and milk except K is in mg/f.
Units are total pCi for air particulate filters.
(c)
Units for food analysis are pCi/kg.
(d)
A new chemistry was tried but did not give good results.
A further refinement of the chemistry is planned.
99 I
l (e)
The proportional counters are calibrated for alpha efficiency with Am-241.
Low energy alpha emitters are included in the spike; however, no correction for efficiency was made.
(f)
The proportional counters are calibrated for beta efficiency with Cs-137.
The efficiency correction applied for the~ low energy beta emitters overcompensated because the amount of the low energy emitters was small compared with the high energy emitters.
(g)
The low Sr-90 results were caused by erroneously high Sr-89 yields because of trace calcium and barium in the precipitated mount.
Experiments will be conducted to eliminate this problem.
(h)
The three results were 50, 55 and 56 pCi/
The one low result of 50 caused the average to be below the two sigma normalized deviation from the known.
(i)
A new NBS traceable standard was prepared to check the efficiency calibration of the Zs coated alpha counters used to count Ra-226.
(j )
A new Pu-239 standard solution was prepared and a new Pu disc was ordered from NBS to check the efficiency calibration of the counters.
(k)
The results for these samples showed high variability with some I
results near the spike value.
In the future samples will be counted longer and sooner after milk time to reduce the amount of ingrowth correction of Sr-90 into Sr-89.
(1)
The weight of the sample analyzed will be controlled more carefully since the density may vary from sample to sample.
(m)
The reported results were 21, 20 and 19.
If the counting errer (i 1.0) is taken into consideration, these results would have been within the two sigma normalized deviation f rom the kncwn.
(n)
The reported results were 23, 25 and 28.
The one high result cf 2B caused the average to be above the 2 sigma normalized deviation from the known.
100
4 4
APPENDIX F REMP SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL EXCEPTIONS 101 l
)
TABLE F-1 REMP EXCEPTIONS FOR SCHEDULED FISH SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DU9IN3 1985 Date of Reason (s) for Location Description Samalina Loss /E:: c ep t i on OC1 10/23/85 Samples collected did not meet specified arount.
Windowpane Collected: 0.4 Kg; Required: 1.2 Mg Sea Robin Cc11ected:
- 0. 6 I:g; Required: 1.2 Kg Winter Flounder Collected: 70 g; Required: 1.2 Eg e
e W
102 I
I TABLE F-2 REMP EXCEPTIONS FCR SCHEDULED INVERTEBRATE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DURING 1985 Date of Reason (s) 'or Location Description Samplino Loss /Excertion 14C1 Whelk 06/04/85-None available 06/19/85 13F1 Mussels 12/02/85 None available 3C1 Squid 10/23/85 Sample es11ected dic nct meet specified amount.
Collected: 0.4 Kg; Required: 1.2 Kg Sample did not meet the LLD for Sr-89.
Lobster Sample collected did not meet the L'_D for Sr-87.
13G2 Squid 11/13/E5 Sample collected did not a
meet specified amcunt.
Collected: 0.6 Kg; Required 1.2 Ug 13G2 Whelk 11/13/85 Sample collected did not meet specified amcunt.
I Collected: 0.6 Kg; Required 1.2 Kg 5
103
\\
I TABLE F-3 I
REMP EXCEPTIONS FOR SCHEDULED AIRBORNE PARTICULATE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DURING 1485 Date of Reason (s) for Location Description Samolino Loss / Exception 12G2 Particulate 02/19/85-Vacuum pump failed.
Motor Filter 02/26/85 replaced.
Filter was collected but sample volume was low.
351 04/23/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke 04/30/85 and jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Filter was collected but sample volume was low.
12G2 04/30/85-Technician valving error 05/07/85 resulted in sampler malfunt-tion.
No semple recovered.
BA3 06/04/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke and 06/11/85 jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Filter was collected but sample volume
~
was low.
2f43 06/18/85-Electric power tc the sample 06/24/85 was lost.
The filter was collected but sample volume was low.
951 07/02/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke and 07/09/85 jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Filter was collected but sample volume was low.
SD3 07/02/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke and 07/09/85 jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Filter was collected but sample volume was low.
104
o TABLE F-3 (Cont.)
REMP EXCEPTIONS FOR SCHEDULED AIRDORNE PARTICULATE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DURING 1985 Date of Reason (s) for Location Description Samolino Loss /E<ception 5F3 Particulate 07/16/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke and Filters 07/23/85 jammed causing sampler to (Cont.)
shut down.
Canister was collected but sample volune was low.
I
_ 6S2 07/30/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke and 08/06/85 jammed causing semple-to shut down.
Filter was collected but sample volume was low.
2A2,2A3,5D3, 09/24/85-Hurricane Gloria caused a 5F3,7A2,7B1, 10/01/85 power outage to these units.
6A3,8G1,951, Filter was collected but 10A1,12A1 sample volume was Icw.
, 2A2,2A3,5D3, 10/01/85-Hurricane Gloria caused a 701,8A3,951, 10/08/85 power outage to these units.
10A1 Except for 7B1 all filters were collected but the sample volume was low.
12G2 10/08/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke 10/15/85 and jammed causing sampler I
to shut down.
Filter was collected but sample volere was low.
12A1 10/15/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke 10/22/65 and jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Filter was collected but sample volume was low.
7B1 10/08/85-Hurricane Gloria caused a 10/15/05 power outage to this unit.
The filter was collected but sample volume was Icw.
105
i TABLE F-3 (Cont.)
j REMP EXCEPTIONS FOR SCHEDULED AIRBORNE PARTICULATE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DURING 1985 Date of Reason (s) for Location Description Samplina Loss / Exception I
6S2 Particulate 11/12/85-Mi cro-.netering val ve failure.
Filters (Cont.)
11/19/85 Filter was collected but sample volume was low.
12D1 11/06/E5-Vacuum pump vanes b oke 11/12/85 and jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Filter was I
~
collected but sample solume was low.
5D3 11/19/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke I
11/26/85 and jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Filter was collected but sample volume was low.
2A3 12/11/85-Loss of electric supply caused 12/17/85 sampler to shut down.
I 12/17/85-Filter was collected but 12/23/85 sample volume was low.
I e
I
TABLE F-4 REMP EXCEPTIONS FOR SCHEDULED AIRBORNE IODINE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DURING 1985' I
Date of Reason (s) for Location Description Samplino Loss /Excention 12G2 Canister 02/19/05-Vacuum pump failed.
Motor 02/26/85 replaced.
Canister was collected but sample volume was low.
12G2 04/09/85-Sample misplaced by 04/16/85 technician during samplirg.
3S1 04/23/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke 04/30/85 and jammed causing sampler to shut dowm.
Caniste was collected but sample volume was low.
12G2 04/30/85-Technician valving error 05/07/85 resulted in sampler malfunc-tion.
No sample recovered.
l BA3 06/04/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke 06/11/85 and jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Canister was I
collected but sample volume was low.
~
2A3 06/18/85-Electric power to the sample I
06/24/85 was lost.
The canister was collected but sample volume was low.
9S1 07/02/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke 07/09/85 and jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Canister was l
collected but sample volume was low.
SD3 07/02/85-Vacuum pump vanes brole 07/09/05 and jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Canister was collected but sample volume was low and LLD was not met.
I 107
TABLE F-4 (Cont'd)
REMP EXCEPTIONS FOR SCHEDULED AIRBORNE IODINE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DURING 1985 Date of Reason (s) for Location Description Samolina Loss / Exception SF3 Canister 07/16/85-Vacuum pump vanes brole 07/23/85 and jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Canister was collected but sample volume was low.
6S2 07/30/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke and 08/06/85 jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Canistar was I
collected but semple volume was low and LLD was not met.
I 2A2,2A3,5D3, 09/24/85-Harricane Gloria caused a 5F3,7A2,7B1, 10/01/85 pcwer outage to these 8A3,8G1,991, units.
Canisters were 10A1,12A1 collected but sample volums was low.
2A2,2A3,5D3, 10/01/85-Hurriciane G1cria caused s.
I 2B1,8A3,951, 10/08/85 power outage to these 10A1 units.
Except for 7B1 all canisters were collected but sample volume was low I
and LLD's were not met.
~
12G2 10/08/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke I
10/15/85 and jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Canister was collected but sample volume was low.
12A1 10/15/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke 10/22/85 and jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Canister was collected but sample vclume was low and LLD was not met.
7D1 10/08/85-Hurriciane Gloria caused a 10/15/85 power outage to this unit.
The canister was collected 3
but sample volume was low
, g and LLD was not met.
108 l
TABLE F-4 (Cont'd)
REMP EXCEPTIONS FOR SCHEDULED AIRBORNE IODINE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DURING 1985 Date of Reason (s) for Location Description Samolino Loss / Exception 6S2 Canister 11/12/85-Micro--metering valve failure.
11/19/85 Canister was collected but sample volume was low.
12D1 11/06/85-Vacuum pump vanes broke 11/12/85 and jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Canister was collected but sample volume was low.
5D3 11/19/85-Vacuum purp vanes broke 11/26/85 and jammed causing sampler to shut down.
Canister was collected but sanple volune was low.
2A3 12/11/85-Loss of electric supply 12/17/85 caused sampler to shut 12/17/85-down.
Canister was 12/23/85 collected but sample volume was low.
I l
1 I
109 l
TABLE F-5 REMP EXCEPTIONS FOR SCHEDULED NOBLE GAS SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DURIN3 1o85,
Date of Reason (s) for Location Description Samolino Loss /Enception 14S2 Air 05/07/85-Electrical supply to unit 05/14/85 failed.
05/14/85-Ele-trical supply to unit 05/21/85 failed.
05/21/85-Electrical supply to unit 05/28/S5 failed.
1452 06/04/85-The compressed air tank 06/11/85 was inadvertantly evacuated before the Kr-E5 analysis was performed.
~
ll l
110
TABLE F-6 REMP EXCEPTIONS FOR SCHEDULED MILK SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DURING 1985 Date of Reason (s) for Location Description Samolino Loss / Exception 6B1 Goat Milk 01/16/85 Goats dried up for kidding.
02/13/85 Goats dried up for kidding.
03/13/85 Goats dired up for k i od i r.g.
10F1 Goat Milk 01/16/85 Goats dried up for kidding.
02/13/85 Goats dried up for kidding.
03/13/85 Goats dried up for kidding.
SF2 Goat Milk 01/16/85-This farm did not begin I
02/13/85 participating in the sampling program until March 1985.
11C1 Goat Milk 03/13/85 Goat dried up for kidding.
06/05/85 No strontiun 89/90 and Ge(Li) analysis performed, sample lost in laboratory.
07/10/85 No sample available.
~
10/02/85 Supplier decided to 11/13/85 withdraw from sampling 12/11/85 program.
Cow Milk 08/28/85 Insufficient quantity.
,8G2 11/13/85 Insufficient quantity.
I 6B1 Goat Milk 10/02/85 Hurricane Gloria restoration f
lef t no time f or the suppliers to provide samples.
10F1 Goat Milk 10/02/85 Hurricane Gloria restcration lef t no time f or the suppliers I
to provide samples.
111
ll TABLE F-7 REMP EXCEPTIONS FOR SCHEDULED GAME SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DURING 1985 ll Date of Reason (s) for Location Description Samplino Loss /Exceptio, Various Rabbit 03/25/85-Unable to trap semple.
03/29/85 04/15/85-Unable to trap sanple 04/19/85 04/22/85-Unable to trap sample.
04/26/85 05/06/85-Unable to trap sample.
05/09/85 05/13/85-Unable to trcp sample.
05/17/85 Various Rabbit 10/17/85-Unable to trap sanple.
10/18/85 10/21/85-Unable to trap sample.
10/25/85 I
10/31/85-Unable to trap sample.
~
11/01/85 11/11/85-Unable to trap sample.
11/14/85 12/16/85-Unable to trap sample.
I 12/20/85 i
l I
(
I 112 l
l l
l
1 APPENDIX G
{
SNP5 LAf4D USE SUR'/ EYE l
l I
113
I SNPS LAND USE CENSUS OPERATIONAL The operational program is required to comply with Section 3/4.12.2 of SNPS Technical Specifications.
The technical specifications require a survey of all milk animal and gardens greater than 50mm (500 ft2) producing broad leaf vegetaticn within a radial distance of SI:m (5
miles).
LILCO is also required to identif y the nearest nili:
- animal, residence and garden in each of the 16 meteorological sectors.
Environmental Engineering Department conducted the 1985 dairy anima; census, during April and May.
This survey was done by Environmental Technicians driving through each neighbcrhood within the 5 mile radial distance and visually checking for dairy animals.
When e dairy animel was observed the technicians requested information from the owner concerning the amount of milk produced, feed, number of an i m al s and grazing methods.
The 1985 census results indicated that there are no milk producing cows within a5 mile radial distance from the site; hcwever, the survey did locate the f ollowing mill-producing goats:
1.
Sector 6, 1.55 miles east-southeast of SNPS Mr. Frank Pitti Remsen Road I
Wading River, New York 11792 REMP Monitoring Location - 6B1 Inventory:
3 milking goats O non-milking goats Inventory Date:
April 19, 1985 2.
Sector 11, 2.40 miles southwest of SNPS Shoreham-Wading River School District I
Middle School Randall Road Shoreham, New York 11786 REMP Monitoring Location - 11C1 Inventory:
3 milking goets I
3 non-milking goats Inventory Date:
April 12, 1985 114
Table G-1 lists the nearest mi l k animal in the si;: teen neteo ol oc ic al sectors.
Addi ti onal field survey d ata are flied in the Shorehan Record Fetrieval System (SR2 A39.104) - "A7imal Census."
The Garde, Census eas alco conducted by Ensironmental Engineering Technicians visuall y noting each garden of 50m2 (500 ft2) or greater.
The 19E5 census was performed during August and September locating a
tctal of 238 gardens.
Table G-2 lists the nea est garden in the sixteen meteorological sectors.
The field survey sheets and c.aps are filed at Environmental Engineering Melville while a com3 uter print listing each location is filed in SR2/A39.104 "Shoreham REMP Garder Survey 1985."
Environmental Engineering identifies nearest residences by utilizing both aerial photography and vi sual confirmation.
This y ear s census was conducted in December.
Table G-3 lists the nearest residence in each meteo ological sector.
I 115
Table G-1 1
RADIOLO3ICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP; 1985 Land use Census Nearest Mili Animal (within 8 km)*
Sector D2rection Location j
i 1
1 N
Area within s ec t or-is Long Island Scund 2
NNE
!Jone 3
NE None 4
ENE None 5
E Ncne 6
ESE Frank Pitti, Remsen Road, Wading Rivar 7
SE None 8
SSE None 9
S None 10 SSW None 11 SW Shoreham - Wading River Middle School Randall Road, Shoreham 12 WSW None 13 W
None 14 WNW None 15 NW Area within sectcr is Long Island Sound 16 NNW Area within sector is Long Island Sound I
l i
SNPE Technical Specification 3/4 12.2 116
Table G-2 RADIOLO3ICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR.IN3 FROGF.AM (FEMF) 1985 Land use Census i
Nearest Garden
(> 50n-2 wi thi n E km)*
Sector Di rec t i ce Location 1
N Area within sector is Long Island Sounc 2
NNE None 3
NE None 4
ENE Mueller-Eeach Club Rd.,
Wadir.g Ri ver, NY 11792 5
E Missiano-Little Bay Fd.,
Wading River NY 11792 6
ESE Van Wickler-E. Woodland Er.,
Wading Ri/e,
NY 11772 7
SE Rhodes-Overl ock Dr., Wadirg Ri ver, NY 11792 8
SSE None 9
5 No Name-Randall Rd.,
Wading River, NY 11~92 10 SSW William-4 Defense Hill Ed.,
Shorehan, NY 11792 11 SW Menszak-9 Royal Way, Shoreham, NY 11736 12 WSW No Na.ne-3 Feynolds Rd.,
Shoreham, NY 11786 13 W
No Name-2 Colgate Ct.,
Shoreham, NY 11785 14 WNW None 15 NW Area within sector is Long Isl and Saund 16 NNW Area within sectcr is Lcng Island Sound ENFS Technical Specification 3/4 12.2 117
Teble B-3 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITCRIN3 PROGRAM (REMP) 1985 Land use Census Nearest Residence (within 5 km)*
Sector Direction Locati on/ Distance f rom SNDS 1
N Area within sector is Long Island Sound 2
NNC Creek Rd. Wading River, 1429' f r om SNPS (at REMP location 2A3) 3 NE Creek Rd. Wading River, 1516' f r on. SNPS (riintS house east of 2A3) 4 CNE Creek Rd. Wading River, 3444' from SNPS (fifth house west cf Riverhead Town Beach) 5 E
Sourd Rd. Wading River, 3644' from SNPS 6
ESE Bartow - Sound Ed. Wading River, 2917' from SNPS 7
SE North Country Rd. Wading River, 3509' from SNPS (at REMP location 7A2)
O SSE North Country Rd.,
2nd house west of Fheasent Ron, Wading River, 2911' f r om SNPS 9
5 20 Long Bow, Wading River, 3839' from SNPS 10 SSW 16 Defense Hill Rd. Wading River, 4077' from SNPS 11 SW 170 North Country Rd. Wading River, 1632' frem SNPS 12 WSW North Country Rd.,
east of Valentine Rd.,
Shoreham 5771' from SNPS 13 W
Brice - 55 Valentine Rd. Shoreham 4620' from SNPS 14 WNW St. Joseph's Villa, Wading River, 2178' from SNPS l
15 NW Area within sector is Long Island Sound 16 NNW Area within sector is Long Island Sound SNPS Technical Specification 3/4 12.2 u
l 118 l
l
a i
I AFPENDIX H 1982./1984 EfiRATA l
t I
I 119 I
19E 3 REMF Annua'. Report Samplino Locations All sempling locations and specific info mation about the ir.di vi dt al locat t er s are given in Table B-1.
Maps B-1, B-2 and B-3'shoa the locations of sampling stations with respect to the site.
These naps are trac.ngs of portions o; larger maps preparec' by LILCO's Survey Division after an extersive land survey of REMF monitoring locati or s.
Additional informatio, can be obtained by referring to the Site and Vicinity Map of the Shcreham A'uc l ear Power Statior; (Map B-2), the maa of Long Island and Connecticut Shore (Map B-3) and by carit ac t i n g either LILCO's Environmental Engineering Department or Survey Division.
TABLE B-1 LOCATION SA1PLE SECTOR CODE LJCATION TYPE N
151 Beach east of intake, 0.3 mi. N IDM, SOL S
951 Service Road, 0.3 mi. S APT, AID,IDM,GAX, RWA,ECL S
952 East Gate ENFE, 0.3 mi. 5 IDM NNE 2A2 West end of Creek Road,0.2 mi.NNE ART, AID,IDV,SJL SSE BA3 North Ccuntry Road, 3.6 mi. SEE APT,AIO,IDM,50L SSW 10A1 North Country Road, 0.3 mi. SSW AFT,AI3, ICV,EGL WSW 12A1 Meteorological Tower, 0.0 mi. WSW AFT,AIO,IDM, RWA,EOL SE 7B1 Overhill Road, Wading River, AFT, AID,IDM,SDL 1.5 mi. SE E
5D Wildwood State Park, 3.1 mi. E APT,IDM, SOL l
WSW 12D1 North Shore Beach Substation AFT,IDM,50L 3.7 mi. WSW i
E 5F3 Dairy Farm, 7.8 mi. E APT,SO_
t 120
m M
asel0LOGICM tuvincestmTE noelfoninG Pa0Gaan sunnaar 4
I SM0stMAM muCLEAR POW R STATies 900tti NO. 50-322 Surr0La teueTY, stu 70az Januant I to stCtesta 31. 1983 mann me toutu u m 1
-n us MBitM De PAlleenf T0 fat ItsMetR OF RL INDICATOR LOCAfl045 LOCATION WITH NICMtST SEAsl CDWTROL LOCATICII nosmouflat insettp 0F ANALYSES DETECTicut pu ma mart ptan(2)
MAse(2) afronite (unit OF MA5ustENT), PERF0aMD (LLD) (1) aanGE D15fanCE Amt DIRECTies RAnCE RANGE MA5uSEENTS Air Partleplates Cross Beta 832 4 16(608/624) 8A3 0.6miSSE 18(51/52) 16(203/208) 0 l
(10-3pC1/m3)
(4,5 54)
(6.7-54)
(6-37)
Hilk (pci/t)
Sr-89 46 5
-(0/22)
N/A N/A
-(0/19) 0 2
!E Sr-90 46 3.6(22/22) 8G2 10.8mi SSE 6.2(13/13) 6.l(23/23) 0 I[
(0.9-7.7)
(2.0-11)
(2.0-11) canma 46 838(22/22) 8C3 6.8 mi SSE 1647(6/6) 1380(23/23) 0 K-40 (939/1930)
(1410/1930) (838/1790)
(
Cs-137 46 5 13.5(2/22) 6n1 1.5 mi ESE 13.5(2/6)
-(0/23) 0 i
l (12.9-14.1)
(14.1-12.9)
Came Cansna 4
(pC1/Kg Wet)
K-40 2475(4/4) 9S2 0.3 mi S 3580(1/1)
-(0/0) 0 l
(1170-3580)
G l
5 x
E
M M
M M
l 1AsLt C-1 EteCtaiaATIGE5 SF 18818U4. 51 A04180000-89* and -94 AGS GANNA ENITTia5**
i la StefACE watta 58mPLES Results la IMits of pct /s a 2 s1 ee 9
i j
SIAllGS BINesta SATE m-3 1-131 5r-89 1r-98 E-44 l
SN-SWA-3Cl 05-25-83
<100
< 0.4
<3
<0.8 183145 11-02-83 150180
< 0.4
<3
<2.
202161 i
SN-SWA-14Cl 05-26-83
<100
< 0.4
<2
<0.7 180145 11-03-83
<110
< 0.4
<3
<l.
225160 J
SN-SWA-13C2 05-26-83 80 1 70
< 0.2
<9
<0.8 109143 10-17-83 1101 70
< 0. 5
<4
<0.8
<200 i
i U
TABLE C.2
- w' ConCENTRAilte5 0F Sissellen. ate Amt -90 Ane GAsueA (MIITER5** EN Fl5M 5AftPLE5 sesults le units of pCl/tt (util a 2 sl ea 9
STQTIce sensta SATE SESC8tPIIDE 5R-89 Sa-90 K.40 C5-137 j
SN-AQF-3Cl 11-02-83 Windowpane
<4
<2 3560 1 360 8.8 4.6 h
l 05-25-83 Windowpane
<3
<4 3090 i 310
<8 rd R
e P
l if I
E" l
1983 RDO Annual Report I
S iSi
- 0 00 d
S v
v v
v v
8 I
i v
'd
-8SSR8g S
S 28 o
a g
vvv a
v v
v
~
.v vv v
v s
I 6
]
2 g
o v
"r 5
s*S*RES 22 s
A vvvvvvv v
v vv v
g g
8_
i o
g SSR8322 R
S Sa a
I I
~~~~_~~
~
~
~ ~
~
-1 I
y 4 MMMMMM M
M MM M
s1 f.
3 amasssa g
a Sa a
~
- : : a c e
xa s 6-e 6.
=-
8_
En a
- =
- l=,
~E e
a 1,
s
=
s-~
~~~-
s A
V V V V
V V V V V
4 3=
A v
sI w
n Is s
3.
.., ~
~
... - ~
~
R gi v
V A
vvv v
vvvv v
3 13 ms.
a 6.
p r
=j
=]
i e
1 3
5 m
I a
I m
s zsazE 2
-20 s,,
g I
a a
n-s s
a I
$3
$ESE U
8E A
v E
we
~
EEEEEEEEEEEeSe Q
'b
~I 22egio2U2eRAUD A C
w ctRsRct<R0cc*R R i
g
=
5
,i a
3 sEssassEssssB:
A m" V
=
~
1 I
M S
l T
M 1
5 1
1 I
I 5
T-
=
7 3
a A
i A
s' 4
a 3
l =
3
-123-s A
k k
4
. h'r!
y s
s u
h'-
s' n a. M u k d e
- N ~ A u
-~
g g
g g
g g
g g
g
.-r-
....r.
g g
g TaSLE C s C00CENTRAllMS OF Sietsfluel.09* aeg.90 att GAIWGA ENITIERS In stSIIIter saNPLEs Resolas is Wells of pCl/kg (88f) a 2 sigma
.ait s,.
u.=
i-a a ->a a-'a
!;ni1 s,a,,,,
,,,,,t,
53.a45 lMr Offsbere 13/01/83
<s
<3 1464 a 230 (4e8 Ill a IF Isett C.6 Coettmeanslees et essa sectates se age raassCetatts sesosas se seats et to-3 pCs/m3 a a se ne e
h meeIe Se. arf. tar se.artotas se.artoast se.arI. sos se.arv.st 3 se.artoast se. art tar se.arv.398 T
August 14 1 3 14 1 3 1413 1613 14 14 15 13 15 13 171 3 September-2214 2314 2413 21 14 20 13 2213 19 1 4 211 3 october
- 9 1'3 813 913 913 9 13 8 13 8 13 13 1 3 G
- O sitatt moete Se. art.sas se art-est se. art.sst se= art.noat se. art-tast se. art trat sw art. stet se. art.trat seteest a I
.lenuary 17 14 924 1314 13 14 9i3 11 2 3 101 3 13 1 3 12 i 6 k
July 16 13 18 1 3 81 3 15 1 3 1712 16 13 161 3 15 1 3 151 6 g
August 14 13 1313 813 14 1 2 16 13 13 1 3 It i 3 131 3 13 1 6 S eptember 16 1 4 23 1 4 21 1 4 231 4 20 1 4 191 4 21 1 4 23 1 4 21 1 5 g
October 12 1 4 11 1 3 10 1 4 12 1 3 14 2 3 13 1 4 10 1 3 13 1 4 12 1 3 y
Annual 17 1 15 57 1 12 15 1 11 16111 16 1 11 16 1 10 16 i 11 16112 greed 16 i 10 Average plus 2 S.D.
12 S.D.
M 1A6Lt C-1 CetCEgiEATI0a5 SF GAsutA ENIf ff R$* 15 AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES Results in Unite of 10-3 PC1/m3 a 2 stoma STAlles mens (R NUCLIDES JAaUART TERRUARf MARCN APRIL MAT Jue[
l SN-APT-5F3 Be-7 103 i 26 129 i 23 77.6 28.3 103 1 16 109 23 110 1 25 SM-APT-6S2 Be-7 108 i 36 140 1 25' 77.9 1 24.2 84.31 11.8 122 1 24 166 i 28 0
N U1 1
I Atti t-9 Lont. )
CONCINTRAll0NS OF 100lut 131 IN AIR 5AMPlt5 Results in Ifants of 10-3 pCe/mi e 2 segna "e
cp W
5TAllom nuMste N04fM Sa-Alo-843 Sa-AIO-8GI Sal Alt-95I 5dl-Al0- 1041 54-AIO-IIGl Su-A10-12AI Sa-A10-120I
$N-AIS 12G2 y
E5 October
<40
<20
< 20
< 20
<20
<20
< 20
< 20 y
5-2;i
M M
M IABLE C-!?
CONCENTRATIONS OF 10 DINE -131 IN Mit t 5AMPLES Results in Units of pCi/f a 2 sigma MONTH SM-GMK-6Bl*(3)
$N-MLK-6Fl SN-MtK-8G?
$N-GMK-8G)**
54-GMK-10f1(I) SN MLK-12Cl***
April 20
< 0.3 (2)
< 0.2
< 0. 4
<0.2
< 0.3 May 11 (4)
July 5,6 (4)
<0.2
< 0.2
< 0. 2
<0.2
< 0.2 August 2,3 (4)
<0.3
< 0. 2
< 0.2
<0.3
< 0. 2 September 06,07 (4)
<0.2
< 0.1
< 0. I
<0.2
< 0.1 September 21
<0.2
< 0.1
< 0. 2
<0.3 october 10 (4)
<0.2
<012'
< 0.1
<0.2 w
e october 25
<0.2
< 0. 2
< 0.2
< 0. 2
<0.2
< 0. 2 November 15
<0.2
< 0. 2
< 0. 3 December 11
<0.2 Q
- o (4) Sr and gamma analyses not requested for these sampics.
Began sampling on March 14 as a replacement for 7B2. No milk available from this location after September 7.
p o
y
M T ABI E t-t)
CONCENTRAll045 0F STRomilUM.89 AND 90 AND GAMMA IMliflR$ IN Mitt S AMPl f ".
Results in Units of pisti t 2 sigma NUCLIDE SM Mit-6F1 SN.Mit-RG7 54.GMK.RG) 5N-GMK-10FI
%4 Mtt-l/01 (1)*
MONTH April 19, 20 Sr-89 (1)
<2 Sr-90 (1) 2.1. t- 0.6 K-40 (1)l240 i 120 Cs-137 (1)
<5 b
i s
Sr and gamma analyses not requested for this sample.
G M
4 l
Er E
S F
l 2
1
?
l
E E
E E
E TABLE C-13 (Cont.)
C0eC(NTRAil045 0F STRD4TluM-89 Ano -90 AND GApeu (MilitRS 14 MILE 5Apet[5 Results in Units of pCl/f a 2 slyna MONTH IRJCL IDE Sel-KK-6F 1 588-RK-8G2 58-GMK-8G3
$N-Gpt-10F1 588-G8K-H1 August 16,17 Sr-90 2.6 0.5 7.61 0.9 5.8 10.7 2.7 10.5 5.0 1 0.7 November 13,15,16
< 10
<8 14.1 i 6.5 Cs-137 m
i e
n 4
?
E E
E a
1983 REMP Annual Report E
e E
O w"
v nee O
at N.
O E
e E
M e
=
W 4
y 4
3 en.
+1
- =8 P9 w
W
=
g e
e d
O 8C W
==oe.
E
==
I e
ese a
w Ae E 9 O
E e n
ra t
man p 4
W m 4
=
E V
n.,
en
+1 em *
-EN EN O
e nee 4
e W
es Q es e
O et as E n.
E M
E er
=
d es e=
Q.
e med e e3 O%
eJ 5w Ee
=*
e nas e
4W W
^
W e-p
==
e.
(
e-g v
w M
W
= =
a E*
CJ mO en es W n.a no ens
==
4 w tad
.b e *
~ <
e, e.
e a
tas of E*
E>
g
(
E=
EO 4>
y e-
== C C
wi 03 QW D. E in. =
OC e
2 Ed M
E EC
.n..en-W M
C*
e-3 as
.m=
e4 4
- O e" e@
m &#
E V
4 **
om E E=
e-3 M
E ena Q3 i., em e
4, e-O
%J as et Q
m E
O E
O g
C W
g
~
e.
et an
==
E see bd E
OW M
UI N
9 3
<3 O as Q
M
== tes e-e g
e
- I Z
1
-2 us
@E s-4 UI m
l
=
x QE d
== ens y
e-a g
4E Z
e= 3 ea U2
-129-
IABLE C-16 CONC [NIRAll0N5 0F GAMMA [MllllR5* IN FOOD PN0DUCI 5AMPLES Results in Units of pct /kg (wet) t 2 sigma stall 04 NUM8(R SAMPLE ITPE DAT[
K-40 I-111 Cs-131 SN-FPL-8B1 Lettuce 8-18-83 1460 i 150
<5 24.7 i 9.3 SN-FP L-8D !
Lettuce 8-18-83 1870 i 190
<9
<10 SN-FPL-8DI Cabbage 8-18-83 1460 1 300
<7
< 10 iABLE C-20 NO8LE GA5 CONCENTRATIONS OF KR-85 AND XE-133 IN AIR SAMPLES (pCl/m3) w W
STATION NUMBER Start Date KR-85 XE-133 i
SN-NBC-14S2 12-30-82 19 i 6
< 110 04-27-83 36 i 7
< 40
~
08-17-83 21 i 7
< 57 g
w 09-13-83 4517
< 85 g
5 09-23-83 37 17
< 85 S
09-27-83 33 i 5
< 59 g
?"
e$ lI9 3 E 5 'E ? ?
tne m
0 0
0 0
i d
7 0
0 4
e 2
4 S
s les M
s 0
0 9
5 A
u 3
1 2
R M
G O
R P
M O
G R
N F
I L
D P
E M
T A
C S
E L
L L
A O
I C
C e
E cr S
P ae 2
3 4
E S
f t L
ra P
A uW 0
0 0
2 M
3 S
2 A
F8 S
O9 C
1 N
T RG E
I L
AN B
1 PI A
3 R
T 1
SU AD I
R F
O O
B R
S A
N H
O n
0 I
N o
8 T
O i
4 4
7 A
S Ct R
R l a i
T E
tt N
F ae E
F ug 0
0 2
9 0
C E
qe 6
1 1
8 0
N J
AV 6
O 2
C T
R O
P no i
t 2
2 2
3 2
a G
G G
G G
t 3
3 3
3 3
S 1
1 1
1 1
5 3
9 1
2 e
2 0
0 3
1 t
/
/
/
/
/
a 4
6 6
8 9
D 0
0 0
0 0
iHWHI l
.l
1 1983 REMP Annual Report US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM 1983 Collection Teledyne Date Media Nuclide EPA-Results(a)
Isotoces Resul ts (b
01/14 Water Pu-239 8.6 O.9 8.8 i
O.3 02/04 Water Cr-51 45.
1 5.
L.T.90 07/08 Water Pu-239 8.9 0.9 8.8 0.2 10/28 Milk Sr-90 14.
1.5 14.
2.
I-131 40.
i 6.
39.
3.
Cs-137 33.
5.
43.
1 2.
K 1500.
i 78.
1680.
1 26.
11/14 Water Gross Alpha 22.
i 5.5 16.
i 1.
(Sample A)
Ra-226 5.1 i O.8 5.1 i
O.4 Ra-228 2.8 i
.4 2.9 0.6 U
11.
6.
10.
i 1.
11/18 Water Gross Alpha 14.
5.0 12.
i 1.
Gross Beta 16.
i 5.0 17.
i 1.
I e
e I
132
{
19E3 REMP Annual Report Aquatic plants were collected while trawling for the ;ish samples and from along the shoreline, then sealed in pl asti c bags, frozen and shipped.
Deep water sediment was collected using a Sni th-l MacIntyre bottom sampler, sealed in plastic bags, f ron er, a,c chipped.
Beach sediment samples were also collected, sealed
- n plastic bags, frozen and shipped.
2.
Atmospheric Envirorment The atmospheric e,vironnent was examined by an al yz i nc air particulates collected on Gelman Type A/E filters usirg low volume air samplers (approx.
I cfm).
Ai rborne iodir.e was celle:ted by absorption 7 triethylenediamine (TEDA) impregnated charcoal cartridges which were connected in series behind the air particulate filters.
The samplers used were equipped with a vacuum recorder which indicated sample validity and mai ntenance problems when they occurred.
Sample vol umes were measured using dry gas meters while time totalizers indicated the duration of time the sample was taken.
3.
Terrestrial Environment The terrestrial environment was examined by analyzing samples of l
milk, potable water, game, and food products.
Milk samples were collected from five locations monthly, e:: cept during the pastare season (May through October) when the sampling was increasec to twice a month.
Milk samples were shipped fresh wit 5 NaHSOs preservative added.
Potable water was collected quarterly from three locations.
Game samples (squirrel and raccoon) were also obtained semiannually from on-site locations, frozen, sealed in plastic bags and then shipped.
4.
Direct Radiation Direct radiation levels in the environs were measured with energy compensated CaSO*
(Dy) TLDs, each containing four separate readout areas.
Two TLDs were placed at 36 locations and were exchanged on a monthly and quarterly cycle.
C.
Special Samplinn A special sampling program was implemented in the vicinity of aquatic control location 13G2 in an effort to determine the source of radiciodine detected at that station during routine semiannual sampling in October 1982.
Sampling was corducted en a weekly basis, when weather permitted, at station 13G2 (west I
jetty, Port Jefferson harbor entrance) and 13G3 (head of harbcr.
near sewer outfall).
Media sampled included aquatic vegetation, surface water, mussels, and sediment.
A synopsis of this special program appears in Table 2.
133
1983 REMP Annual Report GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF SAMPLES Mill and Water A 1.0 liter Marinelli beaker is filled with a representative aliquot of the sample.
The sample is ther counted for about 1000 minutes w: th a shielded Ge(Li) detecter coupled to a mir.i-computer-based date acquisition system which performs pulse height analysis.
Dried Solids Other Than Soil s and Eediments A large quantity of the sanple is dried at a low tempe-ature, less than 100cC.
As much as possible (up to the total ca.np l e ) is loaded into a tared 1-liter Marinelli and weighed.
The sample is then i
counted for about 1000 mi nutes wi th a. shi el ded Ge (Li ) detector coupled to a mini-computer-based data ac qui si t i on system which perfccms pulse height analysis.
Fish As much as possible (up to the total sample) of the edible portion cf the sample is loaded in a tared Marinelli and weighed.
The sample is then counted for about 1000 minutes with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a mini-computer-based data acquisition system which performs pulse height analysis.
I Soils and Sediments Soils and Sediments are dried to a low temperature, less than 1000C.
The soil or sediment is loaded into a tared, standard 300 cc container and weighed.
The sample is then counted for about si: hours with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a mini-computer-based data acquisition system which performs pulse height analysis.
I Air Par t i cul at e The four or five (depending on the calendar mcnth) air particulate filters for a monthly ccmposite for each field station are aligned cre in front of another and then counted for about six hours with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a mini-ccmputer-based data acquisition system which performs pulse height analysis.
1 134
- Q' c GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF SAMPLES
, 4;rg Q':
y??J Milk and Water A 1.0 liter Marinelli beaker is filled with a representative aliquot of the sample.
The sample is then counted for about 1000 minutes witn y 9 a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a mini-computer-based data 4%
acquisition system which performs pulse height analysis.
- C M.-/
"sy Dried Solids Other Than Soils and Sediments Mi Wh p
A large quantity of the sample is dried at a low temperature, less
- D4 than 100*C.
As much as possible (up to the total sample) is loaded into a tared 1-liter Marinelli and weighed.
The sample is then counted for about 1000 minutes with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a mini-computer-based data acquisiticr system which performs pulse height analysis.
e y
v Fish 5
As much as possible (up to the total sampie) of the edible portion of J
the sample is loaded in a tared Marinelli and weighed.
The sample as 3('
then counted for about 1000 minutes with a shielded Ge(Li) detector 3
coupled to a mini-computer-based data acquisition system which 1..
performs pulse height analysis.
'f Soils and Sediments f,-
d'a Soils and Sediments are dried to a low temperature, less than 100*C.
1 l')f The soil or sediment is loaded into a tared, standard 300 cc container and weighed.
The sample is then counted for about six hours with a "g
shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a mini-computer-based data 5
acquisition system which performs pulse height analysis.
(
f :?
Air Particulate
[
., ~
The four or five (depending on the calendar month) air particulate
'f filters for a monthly composite f or each field station are aligned one in front of another and then counted for about six hours with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a mini-computer-based data acquisition system which performs pulse height analysis, j,
p 4
135 O
.'r
' f.
'