ML20210D066
| ML20210D066 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 03/02/1987 |
| From: | TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210C645 | List:
|
| References | |
| ECE-1.01, NUDOCS 8705060414 | |
| Download: ML20210D066 (37) | |
Text
'
t
[
r TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PROCEDURE ECE 1.01 ORGANIZATION FOR INFORMATIC N ONLY REVISION: 0 ISSUE DATE: 3/2/87 EFFECTIVE DATE: 3/2/87 CONCURRENCE:
r , 11)
-#A MM[d. /
ctric Quality Assurance d
APPROVED: .
tOEL1 . .b TC-P 3 / Alt") )
Director, Comanche feak Engineering f .i 87jsogog giogs
I ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PROCEDURE ECE 1.01 !
ORGANIEATION 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure defines the Comanche Peak Engineering (CPE) organization at Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES) and describes interface control between CPE and Imad Contractors (LC), and between Lead Contractors and Other Contractors (OC).
2.0 APPLICABILITY This procedure applies to CPE 'and Engineering Imad Contractors working at CPSES.
This procedura replaces Procedure ECE-AD-1, Revision 12.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 NEO 1.01 "Organisation of the Nuclear Engineering and Operation Group
- 3.2 ECE 1.01-11 (ECE AD-1 1) " Preparation and Review of Engineering Task Descriptions" 1
i NOTE The procedure / instruction number in parentheses is the precedure/ instruction number per the Procedure ECE AD 3 numbering scheme. This number is valid i until the procedure / instruction is revised and the new number, per Procedure ECE 1.03, is assigned. $
4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Desian . >
f Technical and management processes which commence with identification '
of design input and which lead to and include the issuance of design output documents.
h i
Rev. 0 ECE.1.01 .
Date: 3/2/87 ,'
- Page 1.of 27- .
]
I
l l
4.2 Design Input Those criteria, parameters, bases or other design requirements upon which detailed final design is based.
,4. 3 Desian Output Documents such as drawings, specification, calculations and other-documents defining technical requirements of structures, systems and components.
4.4 External Design Interface Relationship between design groups from different organizations.
4.5 Internal Desian Interface Relationship between design groups within the same organization.
4.6 Task Description (TD)
The TD initiated by CPE, by the IAnd Contractor or Supporting Contractor shall describe the task in sufficient detail for the
(' contractor to plan and execute the task. The level of details in the TD shall be as per Reference 3.2.
4.7 Work Instruction (VI)
Work Instructions provide the actual technical information for the implementation of the task description. WI's include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.
4.8 Summary Scope and Schedule (SSS)
The SSS provides an overview of the contractor's plan to execute a task described in a TD and/or WI.
4.9 comanche Peak Enzineerina (CPE)
The site Engineering Department of the Texas Utilities Electric Company (TUEC), Engineering and Construction Division which is assigned the responsibilities and functions defined in Reference 3.1.
(
- ECE 1.01 Rev.. 0
, Date: 3/2/87
,3 . . Page 2'of.27 s .' .
'f
(~
The engineering contractor designated in writing as having primary responsibility for work defined by a TD.
4.11 Supportinx Contractor (SC)
An engineering contractor providing support to a Lead Contractor for work defined by a TD.
4.12 other contractor (OC)
An engineering contractor having a contract directly or indirectly with CPSES.
5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 Director Comanche Peak Engineering The Director, Comanche Peak Engineering has the overall responsibility for the programs and activities of the Comanche Peak Engineering Department and the approval and impicnentation of Task Descriptions and Work Instructions.
5.2 Lead Contractor
(
Lead Contractor, Supporting Contractor, and Other Contractor persons of equivalent authority are responsible for their company's approval
. and implementation of the TDs and WIs herein defined.
J 5.3 Section Managers. Comanche Peak Engineering The Section Managers, CPE are responsible for CPE Task Description and Work Instruction preparation.
5.4 CPE Engineerinz Assurance (EA) Systems Manager The EA Systems Manager is responsible for ensuring TD and WI compliance reviews and coordination of interdisciplinary reviews.
6.0 INSTRUCTIONS 6.1 Site Enzineering Organization The site engineering organizations (Figure 7.1) for design, engineering, and construction activities at CPSES, consist of CPE and the following Lead Contractors:
~
'(, .
ECE 1.01' Rev. 0
, Date: 3/2/87^
Page 3 of 27 -
g
- *, . ., =* e, s' e
L ,.
)
- Stone and Webster Engineering Corp. , (SWEC)
(SWEC - Corrective Action Project)
(SWEC - Pipe Support Engineering)
Westinghouse (W)
Ebasco (ES)
Impell.(IM)
Grinnell Fire Protection System Company (CFPS)
Engineering Planning and Management, Inc. (EPM)
Gibbs & Hill (G6H)
A description of each organization's structure, functions, and responsibilities as they relate to CPSES activities is detailed in the following sections of this procedure.
6.2 Comanche Peak Engineerinz Department The Comanche Peak Engineering Department within the Engineering &
Construction Division, is organized into.six sections by' engineering discipline or support activity (Figure 7.2). The Director, CPE is responsible for management of the department and reports directly to the Vice-President, Engineering & Construction.
A brief description of the work scope for each section within CPE
{ follows.
6.2.1, Mechanical Engineering t The Mechanical Engineering Section (Figure 7.3), under the direction of the Manager, Mechanical Engineering, conducts programs of discipline activities within a scope defined by the Director, CPE. The programs interface with CPE Sections and other organizations, as necessary. The programs also implement applicable NEO policies and procedures. l The Mechanical Engineering Unit's Program includes:
o Mechanical Design / Systems o Specification of Mechanical Equipment, Components, Design and Construction o Equipment Stress Analysis o ASME Section XI Program o Applied Mechanics o Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis o Materials / Welding Engineering o Chemical / Environmental Engineering
. o Fire Protection / Fire Safe Shutdown o Nuclear Engineering o Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR)/ Technical Specification
, (TS) Coordinatien ,
~
ECE 1.01. Rev. O l
?
Date: 3/2/87 l Page 4 of 27 l
l
..x l
r .
l I.
L Lo i o Westinghouse Interface o Risk and Availability Analysis / Assessment o Independent Review of Plant Changes o Industrial Safety Protective Coatings o
, o Preparation of Task Descriptions as required The Mechanical Engineering Services' Program includes:
o Specification / Technical Review / Evaluation o Design Basis Documents, Drawings, Calculations o System Interaction Program o Commitment Tracking o Subcomponent Tagging Program 1 o Nuclear Operations Defecting Items List o Plant Photographic Record o Q-List Administration o Preparation of Task Descriptions 6.2.2 Electrical Engineering The Electrical Engineering Section (Figure 7.4) under the direction of the Manager, Electrical Engineering, conducts h- programs of discipline activities within a scope defined by the O Director, CPE. The programs interface with CPE Sections and other organizations, as necessary. The programs also implement applicable NEO policies and procedures.
The-Instrumentation and Control Engineering Unit's Program im:1udes:
o Instrumentation, Controls, and Computer System Hardware, Software, materials and services o Security System (Computer) o o Control ComputerValves, SolenoidsBased and Microprocessor Limit Systems Switches ,(including ATUS/AMSAC, RVLIS, CCM, ERF, Analog Controls, DRMS, ;
Containment Hydrogen Monitoring) '
o Main Control Boards, Auxiliary Panels and Associated i . hardware o Human Factors Evaluations o Tubing and Support Installation Criteria o Configuration Control.of In-Plant Software, Instrument and Relay Set Points (Excluding Protective Relays) o Preparation of Task Descriptions, as required ,
The Electrical Engineering Unit's Program includes:
4 r EC'E'1.01 itev. O Da.te : 3/2/87'
.Page.5 of.27 .
9*'
=
e , ,
1 O o Equipment Qualification Program and File Ma ntena i nce o
Fire Safe Shutdown Circuit Analysis Security System (Excluding Computer) ih o
o Electrical Systems Analysis and Calculation tc. wt i s o
Coordination, Breaker Settings, Criteria Cable Sizin o
Electrical Hardware Layout and Installation Settings o
Configuration control or Protective Relay d'
o o
cable and Raceway SchedulePreparation of Task De 6.2.3 Civil Engineering I
d r the direction The Civil Engineering Section (Figure 7.5) un educts programs of by the Director, of ~ the Manager, Civil Engineering, con discipline activities within a scopo defined PE Sections CPE, The programs interface, as necessary, with CTheq pro J and other organizations.'
applicable NEO Policies and Procedures. includes:
The Civil / Structural Engineering Unit's Program
+
o Civil / Structural besign Basis Documents Seismic Floor Response SpectraBuilding Structures a
() o o
o o
Concrete Embedments Containment Level o Geotechnical and Foundations o Earth and Rockfill Dans o Site Seismicity o Hydraulic Structures o
o Computer Assicted Drawing (CAD) includes:
SupportP '
l The Piping and Support Engineering Unit's Program 1 o CAD Support o Piping Stress o Pipe Supports o Component Supports o' Cable Tray Supports Conduit Supports o
o HVAC Supports (including ductwork) o Pipe Whip Restraints o Moment Restraints o
Jet Impingement Shields o
Instrumentation Tubing Supports o Piping & Support System DBD's -
l Rev'. O i O1 -
ECE 1.01 Date: 3/2/87 Page 6 of 27.
~
)
l u .
l - '
e
-,m -.--c.-.,.--= r-.w-y-y _m .,, m ,eu - . ,..n - - -+. a,e
I I
1
(
O o o
Hits Maintenance Preparation of Task Descriptions, as required 6.2.4 Engineering Assurance The Engineering Assurance Section (Figure 7.6) under the direction of the Manager, Engineering Assurance, conducts j programs and activities within a scope defined by the Director,.
CPE. The programs interface as necessary with CPE Sections and )
other organizations. The programs also implement applicable NEO policies and procedures.
The Engineering Assurance Systems Unit's Program includes:
o ECE Procedure Preparation, revision and Maintenance o Subtier Engineering Contractor Procedures Review.
o ECE Procedure compliance with NEO Procedures and Quality Assurance (QA) Plan o Prepares and updates the QA Plan relative to Comanche Peak Engineering Department o Task Description, review and processing o New Employee Indoctrination o Engineering Personnel Training . .
o Training and Qualification /Cartification' Administration
( o Historical Training File maintenance o EC Procedure processing
, o- Distribution of NEOs for interdisciplinary review o Responds to Information Requests The Engineering Assurance Evaluations Unit's Program includes:
o Technical Evaluation and Engineering Activities study o Engineering Activities surveillance o Corrective / Preventive Actions to resolve Audit / CAR findings o Authorized Approval Index maintenance-o Design Control Trending Analysis o Support of EA Activities in Engineering, Projects, Construction, Operations and Quality Assurance o Special Projects
, The Engineering Assurance Regulatory Compliance Unit's Program includes:
o Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-E&C Division Direct Interface coordination and maintenance o Regulatory Issue Response as Implementation coordinatiot o E&C Historical Commitment Implementation verification
' (, _
~
ECE 1.01 '
Rev. 0 '
' Date:.3/2/87
,- ,'Page 7 of 27
, e * * ** e, % e, l
l l , _ . _
n'
- O o E&C 10CER50.55(e) Responses and Activities' Coordination and-Operating Experience Reports _
o Commitment Tracking System maintenance (when operational) 6.2.5 Engineerina Projects The Engineering Projects Section (Figure 7.7)~ under the direction of the Manager, Engineering Projects, conducts programs of activities within a scope-defined by the Director, CPE. The programs interface, as necessary, with CPE Sections and other organizations. The programs also implement applicable NEO policies and procedures.
The Engineering Support Unit's Program includes:
o Correspondence Control.
o Controlled Distribution l o Design Change Control
, o Document Control o ECE Procedures Distribution o Engineering Library o Engineering Records Retention o Word Processing The Project Engineering Unit's Program includes: ,
o Internal Engineering Project Management o Engineering Studies Management
! o Engineering Contractor Studies Management 1
o Design Modification Management o Preparation of Task Descriptions, as required
, The Computer Graphics Unit's Program includes:
o Intergraph CAD System Hardware, Software and Associated Contracts Management i
o CAD Production Procedures and Standard Method Development and Drawing Maintenance o Drawing Restoration Program Management
. o CAD System 2D at ' 3D Drawing Technique Engineering Personnel Training o Preparation of Task Descriptions,'as required The Procurement Engineering Unit's Program includes:
o Procurement Technical Support o Vendor Interface Coordination / Quality Assurance O
j '
ECE 1.01.
Rev, 0 Date: 3/2/87
[ -
- . Page 8 of.27
'
- 9 6 8 ,
- 9,
. - , - , ., ,-, , - - r,,,., ~ , - , ,, v-,, , r
t' f
o Commercial Crade Item Dedication Program development and implementation o- Specification Review, Vendor Drawing and.VETIP Project-Oversight o Spare Parts Review
-o Preparation of Task Descriptions, as required 6.2.6 Work Trackinz The Engineering Work Tracking Section (Figure 7.8) under the direction of the-Manager, Engineering Work Tracking, conducts a program of activities within a scope defined by the Director, -
CPE. The program interfaces, as necessary, with CPE Sections and other organizations. The program also implements applicable NEO policies and procedures.
The Engineering Work Tracking Program includes:
- a. Work Tracking:
l o Nonconformance Reports (NCRs) o Deficiency Reports (DRs) o Request for Information (RFIs) o Technical Information Requests'(TIRs) o TU Electric Design Deficiency Reports (TDDRs) o Discrepancy / Issue Resolution Reports (DIR.t) 4 o Request for Information Clarification (RFIC)
- o Design Change Authorizations (DCAs)
- o Component Modification Cards (CNCs)
- b. Design Modification and Process Package Form Schedule coordination
- c. Design Modification, Process Package Form, Test Deficiency,
{ TUEC Design Deficiency Request and Engineering Change Notice Reports I 6.3 h ad Contractors -
4 6.3.1, Stone & Webster Enzineering Corporation (SWEC) l 6.3.1.1 Corrective Action Project (CAP):
l SWEC develops and implements corrective action to
, document design adequacy for mechanical, electrical, structural, and instrumentation and controls areas.
l i
~ ,
ECE '1.01 Rev. 'O Date:-3/2/87
. Page 9 of 27 -
9
-- 4 ._ _. _ _ - _- m,--, ._-.m- , - . . . _ - . _ - , , , . . , . . . _ _ . ,,. _ - - , - _ -_,. - - - . - - _
./
1 l
O l
+
. J l Concerns to be addressed are derived from Comanche Peak Response Team (CPRT) "Self-Initiated" issues,
" External Sources" issues (TRT, ASLB, NRC, IAP, etc.), ,
and additional items identified by SWEC. SWEC shall "
analyze these issues and determine the generic
, implications in order to ascertain if any additional design efforts might be deficient. Based on the analysis of design adequacy, SWEC shall develop and implement a corrective action program to review and upgrade CPSES plant documentation and hardware, as required, to meet CPSES design safety criteria.
Specific activities are:
o Assessing the design basis of the applicable .,
disciplines. This effort shall include '
development of design criteria and system descriptions in the form of Design Basis
- Documents.
$ o Reviewing appropriate calculations against th's.
, documented design basis.
k,L o Evaluating key engineering diagrams, drawings, and specifications for conformance to design basis documentation.
I o Revising existing and/or generating new
, calculations and key design documents, as j required.
1 o Providing sufficient documentation to support the j conclusion of design adequacy, in the form of Ceneric Issue Reports.
SWEC is also responsible for general construction completion design activities and technical liaison
' with the TUEC Startup Test organization as assigned by TUEC. This includes design development, design
, changes and licensing support resulting from L corrective action activities or as assigned by TUEC.
SWEC is responsible for all civil / structural design and engineering activities including embedmont load i
evaluation, CPRT issue resolution, NCR dispositioning, i -
design change implementation, and licensing support.
ECE l.01 Rev. 0 .,
Date: 3/2/87 e -
Page 10,of'27
- +g
- e
-n , , - ,,a - - -, --m s--,----r-,- --r-- -
+ . - , , , - . . ~ - , - - - - ~ , , - - - - - , ~---,e - - - - . - - - . - - - .
~'T .
SWEC is responsible for all electrical design and engineering activities and all Instrument and Control design and engineering activities including CPRT issue resolution, NCR dispositioning, design change implemen-tation . licensing support, construction support and interface with other design contractors.
SWEC is responsible for all mechanical design and engineering activities including Comanche Peak Response Team (CPRT) issue resolution, NCR dispositioning, design change implementation, licensing support, construction support and interface with other design contractors.
Consultina Work CPE issues work to SWEC for miscellaneous engineering activities under a general purchase order, (blanket order)
G.O. CPF-12344-S (DA-79053). The following are examples of_
this type of work:
{
- a. Review attachments to Westinghouse Steel
- b. Drawing Transmittals
- c. Licensing Reviews
- d. Steam Generator Upper Lateral Support Beams
- e. DCA Reviews
- f. System Interaction Program Reviews ;
- g. Response to SWEC concerns
- h. Audits
In the area of pipe support qualification, SWEC has been contracted to provide design and engineering services for the qualification of the structural aspects of piping and pipe supports. These activities are performed by SWEC personnel in accordance with SWEC program requirements and procedures. Site issued pipe support design changes are approved by SWEC. The l . specific site interface for these activities are I
detailed in Task Descriptions developed in accordance with Reference 3.2.
1 l
, .. \
'ECE 1.01'
.b Rev. O Date: 3/2/87 Page 11 of 27 .-
~ . .- . - -- - - -. . . .
.~
i O 6'.3.2 Westinghouse (W)
Westinghouse has'been contracted to provide.the Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) by conducting engineering design of both systems and. components, procurement, fabrication and associated QA services; provide the initial fuel. supply; and assist in the installation, erection, licensing, . testing,- and operation of the NSSS. Ongoing Westinghouse activities include-the review of design changes that impact completed Westinghouse designs, including but not limited to:
- o .
NSSS. systems. designs,. . .
o Reactor Coolant System (RCS) components supports design, o Westinghouse supplied steel, o . Westinghouse designed supports, o Nozzle loads on' Westinghouse supplied equipment, i o FSAR analyses, z
Westinghouse performs Class.1' stress analysis activities
~
, at the Westinghouse Generation Technology Systems Division (CTSD) in Pittsburgh. Technical assistance is also provided.
Activities are conducted in accordance with approved program.
requirements and procedures. Although a formal interface x agreement has been issued, the specific site interface-for j these activities are detailed in a Task Description developed
- in accordance with Reference-3.2.
6.3.2.1 NSSS Design Basis Documentation (DBD)
Westinghouse is developing a program to supply TUEC
! with NSSS Design Basis Documents. The intent of the DBD package is to establish the original design basis of the CPSES plants and then to compare this to the
- current plant configuration.
l 6.3.3 EBASCO 1
EBASCO is contracted to provide general project' and specific technical assistance in the areas of System Interaction Program, cable tray supports and safety related Trains A and B.
+
and Train C over 2 inch diameter conduit supports,-' protective coatings, and HVAC systems.
Tasks regarding general. assistance are specified by formal i purchase order and supplements. These activities, ranging from-j ASLB support to specific'jobsite assistance, are used in the i
" ' ECE 1.01'-
Rev. O Date: 3/2/87
,Pagef12 of,27 7 ,
n, - *
~* ... s. .'
l i ,
- + . - . . - - . - , , .-.,,,-,..,n , , . , . . , , . , . . ,. . , , - -,--..-n - , - . . . . , . , , --,s . -, , . n- -
engineering / construction effort or as design inputs to the '
established design control programs. ;
6.3.3.1 Systems Interaction Program Ebasco is responsible for those activities associated with the completion and maintenance of Unit 1 and Unit 2 System Interaction Program (SIP). These activities include the identification and evaluation of inter-actions that may result from pipe break events, missiles and seismic induced failures. In addition, Ebasco will perform walkdown and. analysis services related to other activities as identified by the TUEC Vice President, Engineering and Construction. . All these activities will be performed in accordance with CPE procedures. The spe'cific site interfaces for '
these activities are detailed in a' Task Description developed in accordance with Reference 3.2. .Ebasco will appoint a System Interaction Program Manager (SIPM) who will be responsible for scheduling and :
administrative management of the Systems Interaction.
Program. The SIPM will report to the Ebasco Project Engineering Manager who in turn will report to the Ebasco Vice President. Ebasco is responsible for.
providing qualified personnel to perform the assigned activities. ,
6.3.3.2 Structural Activities >
Ebasco is responsible for the structural activities associated with completion and maintenance of the Unit ,
1 and Unit 2 cable tray hanger systems. These activi-ties include:
o preparation of an initial set of hanger drawings representing the intent of design; o walkdown and as-builting of each individual support and cable tray spans between supports, o redlining of individual hanger drawings, o preparation of "as-built" drawings for each j hanger, and, in Unit 1, of the cable tray spans; E.CE 1.01' ~
'Rev. O Date: 3/2/87 .
. . Page'13 of 27 .
- s. .-
_ _ _ _ . _ , , ~ . - - _ . , , - ,,- -. -, - - . . , - - . - . - . - - - - . . , . , , , - , , --.- . , . . ,. , , . _ _ , . -
a o design verification of the system (hanger and tray) with the exception of the Unit 1 portion of 4
the system within the Safeguard and Reactor Building, which are responsibility of IMPELL.
Ebasco is also responsible for the performance of any tests required to support the above activities, resolution of field problems for any new hangers being designed; resolution of NCR's for specific problems;
! backfit problems associated with craft and/or inspection, and preparation of footprint load forms (FPL's) utilized for the evaluation of embedded plates to which the hangers -
attach.
Ebasco is responsible fcr the structural activities j associated with completion and maintenance of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 conduit systems including Trains A and B and Train C conduits over 2 inches in diameter. These activities are comprised of:
. o design verification and reissue of the design i documents governing the design and installation of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 systems, (these are
{-_ respectively the S-0910 & S2-0910 documents) ,
o design of modified and individually engineered supports; o walkdosn and preparation of conduit isometrics for Unit 2 and the Unit 2 conduits within the Unit 1 3 boundary and common area; o design of supports to replace selected UNISTRUT member supports of Unit 1; o walkdown and isometric preparation of selected conduits in Unit 1; i o common collection of pertinent junction box data; ;
o design of any new seismic supports; o preparation of loads for assessment of embedded
! plates.
i
, I * - -
, ECE 1.01 '
Rev. 0 Datei 3/2/87
, Page. 14 of 27 e
- 1 * ** - % e,
- e_
i
,- - _, , . , _ - , - . ,,.m_ __,,y -
_y. , -c_..---, -n - - ,--,s-,-_. . - - , r--. ,- ,
- ... . ~ - . - ,~
t 6.3.3.3 Tests
- Ebasco is also responsible for the performance of any - I test required to support the above activities; resolu-i tion of field problems with any modified or indivi-j dually designed supports; resolution of NCR's and back-fit probleas' associated with craft and/or-inspec-tion. <
1 j 6.3.3.4 off-Site Activities 2
Work' associated with the cable tray and conduit system 3
- activities is performed at the. site and at Ebasco home i offices. The former is performed.under the direction 4 of two supervisory engineers, responsible respectively for Unit 1 and Unit 2 activities. ?They report to the 3
- j. Ebasco Project Engineering Manager. The latter is-j performed by Ebasco personnel using Ebasco procedures prepared in accordance with the contract program j requirements. ' Scheduling and administrative manage-ment are provided by the Ebasco Project Manager, New York Office who reports to the Project Engineering Manager of Ebasco on site. .
(} 6.3.3.5 Personnel
)
' The site activities are performed by Ebasco personnel and personnel from other companies. Personnel, 3
! however, perform work under direct- Ebasco supervision, utilizing CPE or Ebasco project. specific procedures as applicable.
j .
Scheduling and administrative management.
{
as well as technical direction are provided by the Ebasco Project Engineering Manager who reports to the 1
Ebasco Vice President. '
i 6.3.3.6 Protective Coatinas Ebasco provides program development-.and maintenance 4 field inspection and documentation, engineering and t i
technical support and document review for all . '
i protective.costings at CPSES. Protective coatings are here defined as specialized coatings required to i minimize the potential for radioactive contamination in addition to provide the required corrosion 3
L protection. In this Ebasco is also responsible for i
the coatings paper flow group which develops, maintains, statuses and processes the travelers.
j ,
1 ECE 1.01 Rev. 0-l- '
Date: 3/2/87' i
7 , Page .15 of 27 .
s ._' . * ~~ '
q_ . ~
a f '
l O
i Te s,,e s, 6.3.3.3 f any Ebasco is also responsible for the performance oi ities; i res test required to support the above act vfied or indivi. t
. tion of field problems with any modi d dually designed supports; resolution of NCR's an back-fit problems associated with craft and/or inspec-tion.
6.3.3.4 Off-Site Activities i ystem Work associated with the cable tray and condu d at Ebasco home t s activities is performed at the site l anThe former is p t offices.
of two supervisory engineers, responsib e resThey report to t for Unit 1 and Unit 2 activities. The latter is d s ,
Ebasco Project Engineering Manager. -
performed by Basco personnel using Ebasco proc '
prepared in accordance with the contract New progr requirements.
ment are provided by the Rasco Project O Manager of Ebasco on site.
6.3.3.5 Personnel l
( The site activities are performedPersonnel, by Ebasco personne !
and personnel from other companies. i however, perform work under direct Ebssco d as supervi utilizing CPE or D asco projectbyspecific the- proc applicable. h as well as technical direction are provi Ebasco Vice President.
6.3.3.6 Protective Coatings ;
D asco provides program for all.developme technical support and document reviewProtective coatings are protective coatings at CPSES.
here defined as specializedi coatings tion-in addition to provide the required l s corrosion protection. l the coatings paper flow group which de >
. I
? '
~-
- Rev. 0 ,
ECE 1.01 'Date: 3/2/87 f ,Pa5*.15 of 27 i
~, ..
g
~ ' ' ~ - - - - - - - - - - _ , _ 'YM*N%
-l l
b Finally Ebasco is responsible for the development and supplementation of pre and post operational testing and surveillance program for protective coatings. The protective coatings work is under the direction of a supervisor who will report to the Ebasco Project Engineering Manager.
6.3.3.7 QA Interface To provide QA interface, to track critical path items, and to track and update resolution to SDAR's, NCR's, TDDR's, RFI's, and CAR's,_Ebasco has established a site quality analysis team which is directed by a supervisor reporting to the Ebasco Project Engineering Manager; 6.3.3.8 HVAC Systems EBASCO is responsible for HVAC systems and duct and duct support structural adequacy verification. These activities include:
o HVAC systems engineering / design including site ;
support, l o HVAC duct and duct support As-Builting o CAD drawing preparation, l
o HVAC duct and duct support structural design '
verification and site support.
6.3.4 Impe11 Impe11 Corporation is contracted to provide technical assistance in the areas of cable tray supports and non-safety related (Train C) conduit supports (2" and smaller diameter),
fire protection (FF), seismic and environmental equipment j qualification (EQ), HVAC supports, Cable Slack evaluation and
. Fire Protection, j 6.3.4.1 Unit 1 Cable Tray Unit 1 Cable Tray activities consist of a technical review of cable tray supports in Reactor and Safeguard
. buildings of Unit 1:
- i
.ECE 1.01 Rev.- 0 l
.' Date: 3/2/87
' l
. r . - ,
Page 16 of 27 )
s e, *
+
. ;-.mc _ _ _ , _ . . . _ ._ ,, . _ _ _ _ ._ . _
S, i -
i
! a. The support evaluation criteria, methodologies and procedures developed by C&H, CPE and Ebasco were-reviewed by'Impell. Impell subsequently developed criteria, methodology and procedures consistent with j the G&H, CPE and Ebasco criteria documents,
- b. Perform technical review in accordance with the
! Impell developed criteria, methodology ~and procedures on as-built documents resulting in a single support drawing which is developed by i Ebasco personnel.
- 4. c. Included in this technical review is the
! preparation of footprint loads (FPL's) utilized for j
the evaluation of embedded plates to which the hangers
- attach.
! d. Results of the technical review are recorded in the j
form of individual as-built cable tray hanger drawings
- in the Safeguard and Reactor buildings approved by j Impell.
- e. Impell is also responsible for resolution of field i problems associated with new supports or trays, resolution of NCRs for specific attributes and any backfit problems identified by QC or Impell's review
{' of Construction Work Packages.
l 6.3.4.2 Unit 1 & 2 Train C Conduit supports 4
4 The Unit 1 & 2 Train C conduit support (less than or !
l equal to 2" diameter) consist of: '
lt
- a. The support evaluation criteria provided by C&H i
and the results of the target evaluations j performed by Ebasco are reviewed and new methodology criteria and procedures for j evaluation of supports are developed by Impell;
- b. Implementation of the new criteria and procedures by Impell; 4
i
- c. Design change on supports not meeting the i.
criteria developed is performed by Impell; 3
[ d. Design of several non-typical Unit 2 Train C conduit supports by Impell; i, '
- , *r -
i ECE'1.01
- Rev. 0 ,
i j - . Da t'e : 3/2/87- ,
'Page 17.of 27'
, *. 3 4
0 .*
.: ., s ., . * '
- u . -
. . , . _ - _..-- ,,_._,, ..-m_ . _ , - . _ . _ , - - , _ _ _ . _ . . . . _ _ _ . , . _ . . - . . - - - . _ _ - , _ . , - - . . . - - - . , _ , ,
._ m_ _ _ . . . - - _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . . _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _
1 l
b e. Footprint loads developed by Impell for Train C-supports welded to embedded plates are transmitted to the SWEC SEC group for plate qualification;
- f. The results of rework (c) and design-(d) are transmitted to craft by Impell for support construction and rework.
6.3.4.3 Support Activities
- a. Fire Protection Program- ,
The Impell Fire Protection Program consist of
- four main areas: Design Engineering, Construction /Produetion Support, Penetration 4
Seals, and Special Projects Group.
The Impell Design Engineering Group is ,
responsible for identifying and closing.out existing licensing commitments, review of incoming licensing commitments, updating the
- Fire Hazards Analysis and Final Safety Analysis Report, NFPA Code Compliance (except for
! - suppression systems), evaluating emergency lighting and communications requirements, and !
review and disposition of NCRs, DRs, DCAs, and !
TDRs.
The Impell Construction / Production Support Group
, is responsible for the TU Electric /Grinnell l interface for plant review, NFPA code compliance for suppression systems -disposition of Grinnell NCR's, technical support for the new treated
- water supply system design effort, outlying i
! building construction support, interface with i American Nuclear Insurers (ANI) and supporting i capital improvement projects and construction proj ects.
The Impell Penetration Seal Group is responsible for determination of seal design requirements, updating the Design Basis Document for 4 penetration seals, providing input of the Fire Hazards Analysis, Interdiscipline Design Reviews, supporting the Stona and Webster Engineering 1
i
, , , l ECE 1.01 ,
Rev. O i Date: 3/2/87 1 Page 18 of 27 -
4
) Corporation (SWEC) stress analysis efforts, third-
, party verification of penetration seal installations, quarterly design submittals to ANI, maintenance of specification 2323-MS-38F for penetration reals, and approval of vendor (BISCO) fabrication drawings.
The Impell Special Projects Group is responsible for the preparation of the NRC Fire Protection audit, licensing interface, and lead of the Fire Protection Task Force on site.
j b. Equipment Qualification (EQ)
The. Impell Equipment Qualification Group consists of two main areas: EQ Documentation section and
, EQ Program section.
The Impell EQ Documentation Section is composed of 5 groups responsible for the ongoing support i activities of-the Seismic and Environmental Equipment Qualification efforts to support construction and operations and for development of upgraded Seismic and Environmental Qualifications packages. Site support activities include review of DCAs, DRs, and IDRs, upgrade of the EQ files and EQ packages, mechanical cycling requirements, review of vendor documentation, support for the HVAC design verification effort, i
qualified life determinations, establishment of auditable documentation of the plant construction relating to equipment qualification and i
coordination of the SWEC EQ walkdown' effort.
EQ packages upgrade activities include
! implementati6n of upgrade environmental
! checklists and seismic summary packages,-
identification and resolution of documentation discrepancies and incorporation of revised j qualification parameters.
l The Impell EQ Program Section is responsible for.
l the establishment and implementation of the programmatic aspects of the Equipment Qualification Program. This includes development of the EQ Database,. development of the Design 1 .
t t .
ECE 1.01 Rev. O I
Date: 3/2/87 .
- , .Page'19 of-27' 1.
s .
u
}
. ~l i-l e-Basis Document identifying Environmental.
parameters for EQ, the development of the EQ
! Masterlist, support to licensing on issues such as harsh versus mild environment,' coordination with operations and maintenance relating to EQ issues development of the EQ Program Manual, development of EQ Training modules for CPSES use-and development- of the -TUEC Procedures ' necessary to maintain the completed ~Impell Program.
1
- c. Cable Slack. Program.
The cab 1'e' slack program is designed to assure j
adequate cable slack exists for conduit, cable ,
tray..and equipment transitions. The work is performed in accordance with Impell project '
j; instructions and-Quality Assurance manual in support of the SWEC program.
6.3.5 Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Company Crinnell Fire Protection Systems Company'has been contracted to provide design, material, tools,. labor, supervision and all other items (except those specifically provided by others)
- required for the supply, fabrication, installation and testing
- of the fire protection systems for Unit I and Unit II.
t
' Current Grinnell Fire Protection Systems efforts include the items listed above along with inspection, documentation, quality assurance / control,~ final as-built drawings and hydrau-j lic calculations.
Crinnell Fire Protection Systems provides technical assistance
- - to TUEC when required. All work activities are conducted within TUEC approved programs and procedures.
Grinnell Fire Protection Systems interfaces with CPE, Sub-Contracts Administration, Building Management and TUEC
{ QA/QC.
Grinnell Fire Protection Systems quality assurance and quality control responsibilities are audited and monitored by TUEC Corporate Quality Assurance and Grinnell Fire Protection l
Systems Corporate Quality Assurance.
i Crinnell Fire Protection Systems work is further outlined in contracts CP-0702, CP-0740 and subsequent supplements to these-contracts.
.{
! - ECE 1.01 Rev. O t
- Date: 3/2/87 i
. s Page 20 of- 27 ,
,- . r I
l.: ** ,
s.., .
- 1 C. l L
Crinnell Fire Protection Systems works under the direction of
+
Sub Contracts Administration in accordance.with the above contracts. Crinnell Fire Protection Systems design is based on specifications MS-98, MS-38C, MS-38E and MS-73A in conjunction with flow diagrams (M-225 series) and the fire ,
- , hazard analysis (DBD-SY-1).-
6.3.6 Engineerina Planning and Management. Inc. (EPN)
EPM is contracted to provide specific engineering and licensing assistance in the area of fire safe shutdown analysis (FSSA),
! and engineering assistance in the utilization of the cable and raceway schedule (CARDS), plant data (PDS), and fire protection data systems (FPDS). Tasks regarding these services are
- specified in formal purchase orders and supplements.
! EPM is responsible for those activities associated with the completion and maintenance of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Fire Safe
- Shutdown Analyses (FSSA). These activities include
~
o the engineering evaluations and calculations to define a baseline of systems, components, and related design documents that are the basis for demonstrating and maintaining fire protection compliance against the O requirements set forth in 10CFR50, Appendix R; o the development of procedures and work instructions to administer the performance of the engineering evaluations; o the fire protection licensing engineering support for future NRC audit (s) and compliance against NRC Ceneric-Latter 86-10; o the engineering support to ongoing. Fire Hazards Analysis (FHA) activities performed by Impell; o the development and maintenance of a computer software database to store and administer the baseline of systems and components of the FSSA; o the performance of impact assessments of the effect of fire scenarios on the configuration baseline of systems and components; o the determination of the adequacy of the installed and/or proposed raceway fire protection coatings (thermolag);
( .,
s ECE 1.01 Rev. 0
.' 'Date: 3/2/87 3 ,
-Page 21 of 27 j
I 4
o the ' determination of required operational requirements for systems and components based on the impact assessments, including development of operational guidelines; o the datermination of regulatory deviations required and the adequacy of existing deviations; o the documentation of the final results of the impact assessments.
EPM is also responsible for providing maintenance, validation, and control of the 10CPR 50 baseline database, including the -
induction of the FHA data into a common fire protection compli-ance database.
EPM is responsible for providing FSSA design input to Impell and SWEC in support of their activities and in accordance with their Lead Contractor responsibilities.
EPM is also responsible for assisting CPE and SWEC in the utilization of the engineering computer data bases for the cable and raceway schedule (CARDS) and related FSSA activities (FFDS and PDS), including: software and data validation, software and data administration procedures, and training.
All the above activities will be performed in accordance with EPM /QA procedures in accordance with specific site interface procedures.
6.3.7 Gibbs & Hill (G&H)
G&H has been contracted to provide general, project and specific technical assistance to Procurement Engineering in the area of vendor document review. Site activities will be l performed in conformance with Comanche Peak Engineering l procedures.
6.4 Comanche Peak Engineerinz Fire Protection Program ;
The objective of the Comanche Peak Fire Protection Program is to assist TUEC in the evaluation, definition and justification of the minimum set of plant systems and equipment required to achieve a safe hot standby condition and subsequent cold shutdown condition following a control room or cable spreading room fire.
The program includes operational and analytical evaluations of the Comanche Peak Plant relative to the assumptions and requirements of the Fire Protection Program. Thermal hydraulic analysis of plant s ECE 1.01- Rev. 0 ,
Date:.3/2/87 i ,
Page 22 of 27 -
~ _ _ . . ,. _ _ . _ _- _ . . . _ . _ _ _ _ __._ _ _ _. __
1 response to reactor trip and subsequent operator actions to achieve hot standby and cold shutdown is analyzed using the TREAT computer code. The analysis is used as the basis for the development of operational guidance for operators to control the plant following the initiating fire, and to achieve cold shutdown conditions. Program
. . deliverables include an analysis basis document and an operational basis document.
6.5 Interface control Responsibilities 6.5.1 Comanche Peak Engineerina Responsibilities CPE is responsible for:
i
- a. Review and approval of TDs initiated by LC in accordance with Reference 3.2.
- b. Developing TD as per Reference 3.2, if applicable.
i j c. Designating a Lead Contractor, in writing, for each
- d. Engineering Management, Design Control, Administration of
- ( engineering and design work performed in accordance with 1~ approved TD for CPSES.
! e. Ensuring that all engineering work performed for CPSES is completed in accordance with approved engineering schedules.
- f. Providing administrative support to the LC in the 4
i fulfillment of document control activities as specified in CPE Procedures.
j g. Ensuring that the LC's are controlling the interface between other contractors involved with design, engineering, and construction of CPSES activities to maintain design continuity.
- h. Monitoring the LC's performance and adherence to the approved TD.
- i. Ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements in design,
. engineering, and construction of CPSES.
J. Coordination and overview of contractor's resolution of engineering and construction quality _ deficiencies as i identified by the TU QA, CPE Engineering Assurance and/or i
the NRC.
l ECE 1.01, Rev. O'
, , , Date: 3/2/87 ,'-
l Page 23 of 27
. g .
'f i
I JO 6.6 Imad Contractor Responsibilities LC is responsible for:
l a. Developing TDs and applicable Work Instructions (WI) for all new tasks, and existing tasks as required by CPE to clarify the
, assignments or to reassign portions of the work among other f contractors.
I
- b. Obtaining approval from CPE on all TD, WI and Summary Scope j
Schedules (SSS) before initiating.
- c. Establishing procedures for documentation control with other f-contractors and with supporting contractors, if applicable, as well as within LC organization.
- d. Developing project procedures / instructions to control the design interfaces between contractors.
100TE These procedures are approved by all interfacing contractors and by the Director, Comanche Peak Engineering.
- e. Developing project procedures and/or instructions referenced in the Task Description and/or Work Instruction for concurrence by CPE.
- f. Developing interface control (internal / external) and lines of
- communication.
- g. Developing a monitoring system for the execution of the task to assure compliance with appropriate procedures, regulatory require-ments and approved TD/WI/SSS.
- h. Establishing Training Programs and requirements for maintenance of 2 training records.
' 6.7 Interface Control 6.7.1 External 6.7.1.1 Identification of Interface Each Lead Contractor identifies, in writing, the
! - external interfaces between organizations (contractors t
ECE 1.01 Rev., 0
~
4
.Date: 3/2/87 '
,3 Page 24 of 27 -
s ..
O .I and/or CPE) and includes organizations providing criteria, designs, specifications and technical direction. Included are those organizations required to receive Design Output from the IAad Contractor or provide design input to the Lead Contractor. ,
6.7.1.2 Responsibilities Each Lead Contractor defines and documents in suff-icient detail, the responsibilities to cover.the preparation, review and approval of documents involving all major events as defined in TD/WI/SSS.
Responsibilities are set forth in the " Interface Responsibility Matrices" of the TDs.
6.7.1.3 Lines of Communication ,
LC establishes systematic methods for cotasunicating ,
l with Supporting Contractors for all changes during the execution of the TD. These documents identify the 1
positions and titles of key personnel in the communication channels and their responsibilities for l decision-making,for resolution of problems, for providing and reviewing information, and taking
!( necessary action within the TD scope, t
6.7.1.4 Documentation CPE and 14 document interface controls are addressed by CPE in appropriate procedures associated with TDs.
14 interface established through these procedures also controls the flow of information between contractors. These procedures are signed by all i
interfacing contractors and approved by the Director, Comanche Peak Engineering. Information transmitted ;
from one contractor to another is identified and l issued by authorized persons. - Docsasentation requesting or providing information or requesting action is controlled by a system which assures the completion and acknowledgement by all interfacing contractors. This documentation is maintained as a a
record.
/
l
. < 1
Rev. 0 l
' ECE 1.01 Date: 3/2/87 Fage.25 of 27 ' ,
3 -
- . ~ ,
s.
i
--,r-. ,,-~,-,,,-,r ,- r. , , , - - - ,.n,. ,, , - - - ,-------,,.--,--,a-,w. -, - , . , ., , - - , - ----as, --.,a., ,-n,, w.,--
i i
6.7.2 Internal 6.7.2.1 Identification of Interface Each Lead Contractor performing the work identifies, in writing, its internal TD/WI/SSS interfaces for
- managing the flow of task information between organizational units.
6.7.2.2 Responsibilities LC defines for each organizational unit the prepara.
tion, review, approval, distribution and revision of documents involving task interfaces.
6.7.2.3 Lines of Communication LC establishes systematic methods for communicating needed task information across internal interfaces, including changes to tho'TD/WI/SSS as work progresses.
6.8 Task Description
- The TD describes a task in sufficient detail for the contractor to plan and execute the task. For each TD, a control program is established and executed in accordance with approved ,
procedures. The 14 defines the organizational structure which is to be implemented and delineates the authority and responsibility of the persons and organizations involved in performing the activities. The responsibilities and interfaces among the contributing organizations (contractors), both internal and external, are defined. Provisions are made in the Work Instruction (WI) for periodic audits, review and evaluation of the effectiveness of the program in achieving the task objectives. TD's are developed for all specialized tasks that need detailed instructions and engineering tasks over 100 man hours. 14 develops the TD in accordance with Reference 3.2 and obtains approval from CPE before initiating the task.
6.8.1* Work Instruction (WI)
WI's are developed for each TD using the guidelines stated in Reference 3.2.
f ..
. . t ECE 1.01 Rev. 0 Date: 3/2/87
.Page.26 of127
< a g
. . - - , . - , ~ - . - - . _ - -
4 t
, 6.8.2 Summary Scope And Schedule (SSS) 1 The Summary Scope and Schedule provides an overview of the contractor's plan to execute the task described in a TD and/or WI. The plan is used to determine work priorities in order to meet the task objectives.
7.0 FIGURES I
7.1 Site Engineering Organization Chart 7.2 Comanche Peak Engineering Organization-Chart i 7.3 Mechanical Engineering Section Organization Chart 7.4 Electrical Engineering Section Organization Chart 4
7.5 Civil Engineering Section Organization Chart 7.6 Engineering Assurance Section Organization Chart
! 7.7 Engineering Project Section Organization Chart 7.8 Engineering Work Tracking Section Organization Chart
! 8.0 ATTACHMENTS 8.A Procedure Matrix 8B Intent Change Index Form 9.0 QA RECORDS l None-4 4
i i
i i
a a
i i' ~
ECE 1.01 *
- Rev. '0 .
Date: 3/2/87
' Page- 27 of 27 .
i.
s -
i i
w ,---..,,..r. ,-a---, a m ,,a-- . , , +n---. - r - - . -, . - . -, .., , . , - - -
FIGURE 7.1 C'
k" SITE ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION CHART TU ELECTRIC VP/t & C e
DIRECTOR OF COWANCMC PCAK EN GIN E E RING i
.O [ : : :
(tU 1 i
i i
EE'"" ELL i
STONE & WEB 5TER : Gigg5 & MILL : CSASCO CMGINEERING CORP. :
- OtSTRICT GENERAL I PROJECT WGR. OF FIC E R viCg l
- N CMARGE PRE 5 0CNT : MANAGCe {
(CAP) . l ENGIN E E RING STONE & WESSTER WESTINGMOUSE adPELL PLANNING AND CNGINCCRING CORP. WANAGEWCNT.
5tTC WANAGER SITE MANAGER SITE MANAGER (P5C) 1 l
. ... asseonema roa enove e oescwN ron :=emsta e actmens as e<asetto et tw twc vs. ame=ren e a comeraveto.
ECE l.01 Rev. 0 Date: 3/2/B7 .
Page 7.1 - I cf.I.
s'
.- 1 1
, Ig e
FIGURE 7.2 COMANCHE PEAK ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION CHART 1
DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING M
l i
MANAGER OF MANAGER OF MANAGER OF MECHANICAL CIYil ENGINEERING
~
ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASSURANCE b
MANAGER OF MANAGER OF MANAGER .
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING OF ENGINEERING PROJECTS WORK TRACKING I
i 1
i ECE 1.01 Rey, a O ,
e
~
Date: 3/2/87 Page 7.2 - I ar l e
- - s
~ '
-* s -
s.
- -,- -r, e -_ , _ _ _ ,
FIGURE 7.3 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SECTION ORGANIZATION CHART 5
MANAGER MECHANICAL ENGINEERING M
MECHANICAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING ENGINEERING MANAGER SERVICES MANAGER l
Rev.0 Scg g ,gg , Date* 3/2/87 Page 7.3 '- 1 of I
~
I -
t . . ..
(
FIGURE 7.4 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SECTION ORGANIZATION CHART l
l MANAGER ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING f
I I&C ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING ENGINEERING
.. MANAGER MANAGER l
( '
i l
l l
ECE I.01 ', Rev. 0
. Dat e: 3/2/B7 Page 7.4 - I of I
., '"e, s e,
- s, " '
-a - - - - - ; - - -- - a .
FIGURE 7.5 CIVIL ENGINEERING SECTION ORGANIZATION CHART MANAGER CIVIL ENGINEERING M
l CIVIL PIPING & SUPPORT STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING l MANAGER MANAGER l
l l
l l
ECE 1.01 Rev.D *
.. Dot e: 3/2/87 Page 7.5 *- I of I 4
- , _ . . , . . _ . , _ _ _ - - . . _ _ . _ - . . . . - _ . ~ . . , - - - - _ - _ - . _ . , , , . . . _ _ _ _ ..-.- ..-.,. - ,..- __ , , . , , . , _ , - _ . . . . _ - - -
I FIGURE 7.5 cc ENGINEERING ASSURANCE SECTION ORGANIZATION CHART i
l l
MANAGER ENGINEERING ASSURANCE ;
M l I
l SYSTEMS EVALUATIONS C MP ANCE MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER b
i
!I I l
1 I
l E C E.1.01 Rev. O l '*
Date: 3/2/87 Page 7.5 .1 or i O/ # ,
- . a I
f j .,
N FIGURE 7.7 ENGINEERING PROJECTS SECTION ORGANIZATION CHART MANAGER ENGINEERING PROJECTS M
ENGINEERING COMPUTER SUPPORT GRAPHICS MANAGER MANAGER
- O i i l
l PROJECT PROCUREMENT
- ENGINEERING ENGINEERING
{ MANAGER MANAGER i
i I
l ECE 1.01 Rev.o l
~
Dole: 3/2/87
.Poge 7.7 - I or i
. .* , j
..*._ s .. . s.
l
- l. . _ . _. _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . _ . . . _ , . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . - _ _ _ _ . - , _ . _ _ _ . . _ - - _ _
4 FIGURE 7.8 ENGINEERING WORK TRACKING SECTION ORGANIZATION CHART MANAGER WORK TRACKING M
SUPERYlSING ENGINEER r- WORK TRACKING l
l l
t ECE I.01 Rev.0
[ * *
' ' Dat e: 3/2/87 Page 7.8 - I of I e
g, *
,,_, _ ,___ _ _,_, ___.___._ ,__x _ , . . . , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
ATTACHNENT 8.A b PROCEDURE MATRIX V l 1
CHANGES IN THE FOLIDWING SECTIONS OF' PROCEDURE ~ ECE 1.01 Rev. O MAY AFFECT THE FOLIDWING PROCEDURES / INSTRUCTIONS:
SECTION PROCEDURE / INSTRUCTION IMPACTED 1 6.2 ALL 2 6.3.1.2 ECE 5.05-13, ECE 5.11, ECE 5.11-11 3 6.3.2 ECE 5.11 ,
4 6.3.3.1 ECE 2.24 5 6.3.3.6 ECE 3.21 6 6.5 ECE 1.01-11
{' 7 6.6 ECE 1.01-11 8 6.7 ECE 1.01-11 9 6.8 ECE 1.01-11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 PREPARED BY
. - ECE 1.01 -
Rev. O f '
Date: 3 2/87 g -
Page 8. - 1 of 1
~.
l
'i ATTACHMENT 8.B INTENT CHANCE INDEX FORM PROCEDURE NO: ECE 1.01 REVISION NO. 0 1
M SECTIM W DEMlRIFFIM tr Cl3AMig CRANGE IllIf! Aft lR wunsa rzxt esANoEn l
- i I
l
/ 7 .
( . ECE 1.01' -
Rev. 0 .
( .
Date: 3/2/87*
Page 8.8 - 1 of 1
, ,, . . 1 h O, h 6 O' j
t '" . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ -
e- -
f'_L4 $llvi,,
s- .O:l
' g
- e;' ,
_' [P V " "
4_ ^
jib e
,~
~ _ s 7' - + 4
$$,. f;l s
~
- j Ebasco SAC-CP4 " Seismic Design
- gjjg i g , --
~
" Criteria for Cable Tray Hangers for s g ;. ,
^MW Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station No. <-
-:i ' '
1",
~ Rev 4 (Replace pages - cover '
N
['~'~ ,
page, 1, I thru 10 in Reference 35) y +
_n e4 9: -E t.* j 41 g-1
_'h :'. -
b $
> p
.h t F '
- y
.,M,'
2 a q ^ : y i
..- I - ,
i b i y k.
A
}
A 4
j- . n i-i.
o
- 1
[ 1 j, ,
b.
I y ,
..