ML20210B233

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notification of 721102 & Possible 721103 Meeting W/Ge to Discuss Torus Ring Header Hangers Failure,Design Descriptions,Test Program,Design Alteration Considerations & Program Schedule.Proposed Agenda Encl
ML20210B233
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities, 05000000
Issue date: 10/27/1972
From: Riesland J
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Skovholt D
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20209J032 List:
References
FOIA-87-40 NUDOCS 8705050265
Download: ML20210B233 (2)


Text

  • .- . , ,

ysts u .

L co,*'g UNITED STATES f+

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION b,N N, sf* WASHINGTON. O.C. 20545 ocT 2 71972

Donald J. Skovholt, Assistant Director for Operating Reactors, L l THRU: D . Ziemann, Chief, ORB #2, L l

' .Ng.

  • S&mm

, MEETING WITH GEURAL ELECTRIC COMPANY - BWR TORUS RING HEADER DESIGN Date, Time and Place: November 2, 1972 November 3, 1972 (if required) 9:00 a.m. 9:00 a.m.

Room P-422 Room P-118 J i So n / /

Regulation Attendees: LJ.Riesland,L:0RB#2 W. Haass, L:BWR D. Skovholt, L:0R R. McDerr.ott, RO D. L. Ziemann, L:0R3 #2 J. Henderson, RO D. Lange, L:TR J. Keppler, RO S. Chan, L:TR Other Attendees: Representatives APED, GE Purpose of Meeting: Discuss torus ring header hangers failure, design descriptions, test program, design alterstion considerations and program schedule.

w0.hdd gJohnI.Riesland

. . . Operating Reactors Branch #2 Directorate of Licensing

Enclosure:

I Proposed Agenda for Discussion of Torus Header Design cc w/ enclosure:

R. F. Fraley, ACRS Reg Attendees ,

H. Thornburg, RO Central 711e )

R. Engelken, RO Receptionist l A. Giachusso, L:RP RP Reading M. Rosca, L:RP Branch Reading .

T. J. Carter, L:0R R. M. Diggs, L:GRB #2

. Y 8705050265 870428 PDR FOIA THOMAS 87-40 PDR

v n t

o PROPOSED AGENDA _FOR_ DISCUSSION OF_ TORUS _ HEADER DESIGN

,e p 1. Generic discussion of ring header torus systems for GE plants.

Identify similarities and diff erences between support systems.

Identify the designer and constructor for etch plant. .

2. Brief description of Quad-Cities ring header showing penetrations, relief valve discharge locations, etc. Deacription of identifi-cation scheme f or supports and penetrations.
3. Description of mathematical model for torus-ring header system, including theoretical bases for dynamic analysis. (Not to include description of computer programs.)
4. Description of test requirements showing how data from test will support model. Include description of instrumentation showing location and type. Compare recent test with previous test performed at Quad-Citics.
5. Describe test and data taken. Discuss parameters measured and show how data provides required information. Describe details regarding orientation of instruments, reasons for location, limitations on capability of test and instruments. Discuss trends indicated by data.
6. Show' how results of tests can be applied to other plants.
7. Discuss basis for f atigue life of torus-ring header system. If usage factor is not used, what means is used to account for fatigue life?
8. Discuss how the static forces, thermal effects, vibration, shock, and earthquake loadings are accounted for in the design. Explain modes of stresses for each loading.

f, b,fH.' o'~ V O % WJ on;l//trl en O !' A'","A*' ' ' '" / ' ' 'l' /' ' ' 'l d v h.'o /) , ' ' ' * * ' Af N'# ' ' ' -

ff .;i.e e, i l hs y /r. 1

,g , ,$y , ./ . Mo v e.- *. , / ll b '*y'* -

e