ML20209D337

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of 750513 & 20 Ltrs Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Noncompliances Noted in .Actions to Correct Infractions B & D Insufficient
ML20209D337
Person / Time
Site: 07001193
Issue date: 06/24/1975
From: Hind J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Shelley W
KERR-MCGEE NUCLEAR CORP.
Shared Package
ML20209D148 List:
References
FOIA-86-281 NUDOCS 8609090269
Download: ML20209D337 (3)


Text

, - - - .- - - - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

r

, ,, e

  • ' 4
  • UNITED STATES 1

fedCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIOil CEGIOtJ lit s 799 ROOSEVELT RO AD l [ CLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 60137 EJUfP2 41975 1

! Korr-McGee Nuclear Corporction Docket No. 70-1193

.wrN: tir. W. J. Shelley, Director

{ Regulation and Control ,

Kerr-McGee Center 0;;1ahona City, Oklahoma 73125 centiccen:

Thcnk you for your lettera dated May 13 and May 20, 1975, informing us of the stepn you have tchen to correct the iters of ncnconpliance which ve brought to your attentica in cur lette.r dated April 24, 1975. Our cc:= cats on the corrective action you have taken or propose to take arn contained in the enclosure to thin letter.

As czplained in the enclosure, it cppears.to us that certain of the actions you have tchen are not sufficient to achieve full co=pliance with certain license requirements. Therefore va request that you recy.cmine these requirencots and advise us in vriting within twenty days of your rceeipt of this Iceter of the cdditional sccps that you have taken to achie.vc full compliance. If you decernine that there are reasons why full co=plicuca with thene requirements cannot be achieved, you chould contact the Office of Nucicar Material Safety end Safeguards.

The cuelocure to this letter conearns a subject natter which is execpt '

from public dicciosure according to Section 2.790 (d) of the NRC's

'*F.ules of Practice," Part 2, Ti:1c 10, Codo of Federal Ecgulations.

Ccn cquently, the enclocure to thio lotter and your recoonse to the encloauro will not be pinecd in the Public Docu= cut' Room.

' 4, ,

e #

S' A ,~

8609090269 e60815 y-C TR 6-281 PDR s _

[

.. .e .

.~

,..,e ,

f Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corp. JUN 2 41975 Your protest of our strict interpretation of the phrase " effective in m diatc1)" in detorcining your noncocipliance with some of the recently revised parts of Licensa condition 3.9 is ce!:nouledged.

The letter of February 21, 1975 from the Division of Lafeguards

- which trancnitted the revised license conditions tc you contained this phrase, and in the absence of. any provision in the 1cteer for a delay in impicnentation, it was necessary for us to take non-compliance findings in accordance with our observations during the inspection of March 6-12. IIouaver, your prog t efforts to'achicyc cogliance which bcCan i==ediaccly upon receipt of the new require-mento were also noted.

Sincarely yours, J. A. Hind, Chief Materials And Plant Protection Branch e

i - -

4 I

i -

i 1

I t

i 3

/

i 6

l l .

i . .

l .

1 I l

.-e-.- .. ,. . . _ .. -

-..-.-..-..===**.e==*-===.

- -,s .-- ,,,- , ,--- -,---,n.-, . - ,- -,-n - , - - - - -,-.--e.e,,a - - - ,_, m - -

, y

-s .

}-.. L * .--. . . . .

- -* -s--.

  • ** s *..--o-.t.....:.- . . :~: :.***.

wo--s-.-~

c. . 1 ENCLOSURE Korr-McGee Nuclear Corporation Licence No. ShM-1174 The actions you describe for correctin( the noncocpliance items identified in our lett Agl24,1975)asInfractionsA.C,andE and Deficiencies A and ' appear to be adequate co achieve compliance.

Us trill examine these matters during a subsequent inspection.

A Your actions to correct, the noncompliance items identified as Infrac-

{ tions B and D appear to be insufficient to achieve compliance with the

[

/ requirements of the related license conditions. You state that the inspection of vo=en's handbags (and presumbably other packages and containers) at entry and exit from the plant will adequately assure

,' that these personal containers are not being used to conceal Shh on crit or contraband on entry into the plant. The intent of License Condition 3.9.14 of Amendment VJP-1 to your license is to prevent paelages and containets (such as handbags) from entry into the HAA whero they could be used to transport SSM from the plant during drills when the normal persennel enit veuld not necessarily be used.

Similarly, we believe that ycur inspection procedures subsequent to monitoring do not constitute compliance with License Condition 3.9.16.

This requirer.cnt states that no pechages, containers, or coats shall be carried through the scarch devices by exiting personnel. There is no provision for a subsequent search of these articles as a substitute for this requirement. Although this scarch does afford some protection against diversion, it does not appear to cent the intent of License condition 3.9.16 which is to achieve a separation of any items that night contain or be used for shielding SLM from the individual carry-ing them.

e I

IE Control No. 30 Copy No. 2_ of 4

/

e-n i