|
---|
Category:GRANTS OF EXEMPTION FROM & EXTENSION TO NRC REQUIREME
MONTHYEARML20210B8491999-07-21021 July 1999 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w),for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2 to Reduce Amount of Insurance for Unit to $50 Million for Onsite Property Damage Coverage ML20206D4141999-04-20020 April 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2 Re Enclosure of Cable & Equipment & Associated non-safety Related Circuits of One Redundant Train in Fire Barrier Having 1-hour Rating ML20058A5491993-11-17017 November 1993 Exemption from Requirements in 10CFR50.120 to Establish, Implement & Maintain Training Programs,Using Sys Approach to Training,For Catorgories of Personnel Listed in 10CFR50.120 ML20210D7291992-06-15015 June 1992 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements for SNM Storage Areas at Facility Containing U Enriched to Less than 3% in U-235 Isotope ML20155F6621988-10-0606 October 1988 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR55.45(b)(1), 10CFR55.45(b)(2),10CFR55.45(b)(4),10CFR55.45(b)(5), 10CFR55.45(a)(2),10CFR55.53(e) & 10CFR55.53(f) Re Operators Licenses About Requirements for Plant Simulation Facility ML20153E6771988-08-31031 August 1988 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR55.59(c)(2), Subsections (IV) & (V), & 10CFR55.59(c)(3)(i) Items a Through AA, Eliminating Requirements for Certain Lecture Subjs & Manipulation Exercises ML20155B6631988-05-27027 May 1988 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements.Exemption Contingent Upon NRC Review of Mode 1 Criticality Analysis ML20210T1521987-02-0909 February 1987 Exemption from 10CFR50,App A,Gdc 17 & 19 Requirements Re Electrical Power Sys & Control Room Habitability ML20141G1251985-12-30030 December 1985 Exemption from 10CFR50.61 Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events ML20138K1631985-10-24024 October 1985 Exemption from 10CFR61.55 Re Waste Classification of Epicor II Resin Liners ML20138D3921985-10-17017 October 1985 Exemption from 10CFR30.51,40.61,70.51(d) & 70.53 Requirements,Per 850418 Request.Exemption from 10CFR70.53 Shall Expire Following Completion of Defueling Effort, Including Assessment of Fuel Fines & Debris within Plant ML20134L9361985-08-28028 August 1985 Exemption from GDC 34 Re Removal of Residual Heat & GDC 37 Re Testing of Eccs,Per Util 850326 Request.Environ Assessment & Notice of Finding of No Significant Environ Impact Encl ML20133P8021985-08-0808 August 1985 Exemption from 10CFR50 App A,Gdc 34 Re RHR Sys & GDC 37 Re Testing of ECCS Sys ML20128H7961985-05-16016 May 1985 Partial Exemption from 10CFR50.54(a) Requirements Re Incorporating QA Program Revs Into FSAR 1999-07-21
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20210B8491999-07-21021 July 1999 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w),for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2 to Reduce Amount of Insurance for Unit to $50 Million for Onsite Property Damage Coverage ML20206D4141999-04-20020 April 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2 Re Enclosure of Cable & Equipment & Associated non-safety Related Circuits of One Redundant Train in Fire Barrier Having 1-hour Rating ML20206T7211999-02-11011 February 1999 Memorandum & Order (CLI-99-02).* Denies C George Request for Intervention & Dismisses Subpart M License Transfer Proceeding.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990211 ML20198A5111998-12-11011 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rulemaking Details Collaborative Efforts in That Rule Interjects Change ML20154G2941998-09-17017 September 1998 Transcript of 980917 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re License Transfer of TMI-1 from Gpu Nuclear,Inc to Amergen. Pp 1-41 ML20199J0121997-11-20020 November 1997 Comment on Pr 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommisioning Nuclear Power Reactors.Three Mile Island Alert Invokes Comments of P Bradford,Former NRC Member ML20148R7581997-06-30030 June 1997 Comment on NRC Proposed Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems. Licensee References Proposed Generic Communication, Control Rod Insertion, & Ltrs & 961022 from B&W Owners Group ML20078H0431995-02-0101 February 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Lowpower Operations for Nuclear Reactors ML20077E8231994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule ML20149E2021994-04-20020 April 1994 R Gary Statement Re 10 Mile Rule Under Director'S Decision DD-94-03,dtd 940331 for Tmi.Urges Commissioners to Engage in Reconsideration of Author Petition ML20065Q0671994-04-0707 April 1994 Principal Deficiencies in Director'S Decision 94-03 Re Pica Request Under 10CFR2.206 ML20058A5491993-11-17017 November 1993 Exemption from Requirements in 10CFR50.120 to Establish, Implement & Maintain Training Programs,Using Sys Approach to Training,For Catorgories of Personnel Listed in 10CFR50.120 ML20059J5171993-09-30030 September 1993 Transcript of 930923 Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-130.Related Documentation Encl ML20065J3461992-12-30030 December 1992 Responds to Petition of R Gary Alleging Discrepancies in RERP for Dauphin County,Pa ML20065J3731992-12-18018 December 1992 Affidavit of Gj Giangi Responding to of R Gary Requesting Action by NRC Per 10CFR2.206 ML20198E5581992-12-0101 December 1992 Transcript of Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel on 921201 in Rockville,Md ML20210D7291992-06-15015 June 1992 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements for SNM Storage Areas at Facility Containing U Enriched to Less than 3% in U-235 Isotope ML20079E2181991-09-30030 September 1991 Submits Comments on NRC Proposed Resolution of Generic Issue 23, Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Failure. Informs That Util Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20066J3031991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Supporting SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept ML20059P0531990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal ML20059N5941990-10-0404 October 1990 Transcript of 900928 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Studies of Cancer in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities, Including TMI ML20055F4411990-06-28028 June 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR ML20248J1891989-10-0606 October 1989 Order.* Grants Intervenors 891004 Motion for Permission for Opportunity to Respond to Staff Correspondence.Response Requested No Later That 891020.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 891006 ML20248J1881989-10-0303 October 1989 Motion for Permission for Opportunity to Respond to Staff Correspondence in Response to Board Order of 890913.* Svc List Encl ML20248J0301989-09-29029 September 1989 NRC Staff Response to Appeal Board Order.* Matters Evaluated in Environ Assessment Involved Subjs Known by Parties During Proceeding & Appear in Hearing Record & Reflect Board Final Initial Decision LBP-89-7.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247E9181989-09-13013 September 1989 Order.* Requests NRC to Explain Purpose of 890911 Fr Notice on Proposed Amend to Applicant License,Revising Tech Specs Re Disposal of Accident Generated Water & Effects on ASLB Findings,By 890929.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890913 ML20247G0361989-07-26026 July 1989 Transcript of Oral Argument on 890726 in Bethesda,Md Re Disposal of accident-generated Water.Pp 1-65.Supporting Info Encl ML20247B7781989-07-18018 July 1989 Certificate of Svc.* Certifies Svc of Encl Gpu 890607 & 0628 Ltrs to NRC & Commonwealth of Pa,Respectively.W/Svc List ML20245D3651989-06-20020 June 1989 Notice of Oral Argument.* Oral Argument on Appeal of Susquehanna Valley Alliance & TMI Alert from ASLB 890202 Initial Decision Authorizing OL Amend,Will Be Heard on 890726 in Bethesda,Md.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890620 ML20245A5621989-06-14014 June 1989 Order.* Advises That Oral Argument on Appeal of Susquehanna Valley Alliance & TMI Alert from Board 890202 Initial Decision LBP-89-07 Authorizing OL Amend Will Be Heard on 890726 in Bethesda,Md.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890614 ML20247F3151989-05-22022 May 1989 NRC Staff Response to Appeal by Joint Intervenors Susquehanna Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert.* Appeal Should Be Denied Based on Failure to Identify Errors in Fact & Law Subj to Appeal.W/Certificate of Svc ML20246Q2971989-05-15015 May 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20246J6081989-05-12012 May 1989 Licensee Brief in Reply to Joint Intervenors Appeal from Final Initial Decision.* ASLB 890203 Final Initial Decision LBP-89-07 Re Deleting Prohibition on Disposal of accident- Generated Water Should Be Affirmed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247D2761989-04-20020 April 1989 Transcript of 890420 Briefing in Rockville,Md on Status of TMI-2 Cleanup Activities.Pp 1-51.Related Info Encl ML20244C0361989-04-13013 April 1989 Order.* Commission Finds That ASLB Decision Resolving All Relevant Matters in Favor of Licensee & Granting Application for OL Amend,Should Become Effective Immediately.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890413 ML20245A8381989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 890413 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-79.Supporting Info Encl ML20245A2961989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of 890413 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote ML20248H1811989-04-0606 April 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Leave to File Appeal Brief out-of-time.* W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890411.Granted for Aslab on 890410 ML20248G0151989-04-0606 April 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Leave to File Appeal Brief out-of-time.* Requests to File Appeal Brief 1 Day Late Due to Person Typing Document Having Schedule Problems ML20248G0261989-04-0606 April 1989 Susguehanna Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Brief in Support of Notification to File Appeal & Request for Oral Argument Re Appeal.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20248D7211989-04-0404 April 1989 Memorandum & Order.* Intervenors Application for Stay Denied Due to Failure to Lack of Demonstrated Irreparable Injury & Any Showing of Certainty That Intervenors Will Prevail on Merits of Appeal.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890404 ML20247A4671989-03-23023 March 1989 Correction Notice.* Advises That Date of 891203 Appearing in Text of Commission 890322 Order Incorrect.Date Should Be 871203.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890323 ML20246M2611989-03-22022 March 1989 Order.* Advises That Commission Currently Considering Question of Effectiveness,Pending Appellate Review of Final Initial Decision in Case Issued by ASLB in LBP-89-07. Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890322 ML20236D3821989-03-16016 March 1989 Valley Alliance & TMI Alert Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Request for Appeal in Matter of 2.3 Million Gallons Of....* Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890316.Granted for Aslab on 890316 ML20236D3121989-03-15015 March 1989 Licensee Answer to Joint Intervenors Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief on Appeal.* Motion Opposed Based on Failure to Demonstrate Good Cause.W/Certificate of Svc ML20236D2901989-03-11011 March 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Request for Appeal in Matter of Disposal of 2.3 Million Gallons of Radioactive Water at Tmi,Unit 2.* Svc List Encl ML20236A3761989-03-0808 March 1989 Licensee Answer Opposing Joint Intervenors Motion for Stay.* Stay of Licensing Board Decision Pending Appeal Unwarranted Under NRC Stds.Stay Could Delay Safe,Expeditious Cleanup of Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20236C2441989-03-0808 March 1989 NRC Staff Response in Opposition to Application for Stay Filed by Joint Intervenors.* Application for Stay of Effectiveness of Final Initial Decision LBP-89-07,dtd 890202 Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20235V2641989-03-0202 March 1989 Notice of Aslab Reconstitution.* TS Moore,Chairman,Cn Kohl & Ha Wilber,Members.Served on 890303.W/Certificate of Svc ML20235V2161989-02-25025 February 1989 Changes & Corrections to Susquehanna Valley Alliance/Three Mile Island Alert Documents Submitted on 890221.* Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-07-21
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _
. i 7590-01 tlNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0 m !SSION In the Matter of GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION Docket No. 50-320 (ThreeMileIslandNuclearStation Unit 2) ;
i EXEMPTION t
l 1.
GPU Nuclear Corporation, Metropolitan Edison Company, Jersey Central Power
- and Light Company and Pennsylvania Electric Company (co11ective1, 3 the licensee) are the holders of Facility Operating License No. DPR-73, which had authorized a operation of the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station. Unit 2 (TNI-2) at power levels up to 2772 regawatts thermal. The facility, which is located in Londonderry !
Township, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, is a pressurized water reactor previously used for the concercial generation of electricity. 3 r
By Order for Modification of License, dated July 20, 1979, the licensee's authority to operate the facility was suspended and the licensee's authority was limited to maintenance of the facility in the present shutdown cooling mode [
(44FR45271). By further Order of the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor >
L Regulation, dated February 11, 1980, a new set of formal license requirements was imposed to reflect the post-accident condition of the facility and to assure the continued maintenance of the current safe, stable, long term cooling l
i i condition of the facility (45 FR 11292). The license provides, among other things, that it is subject to all rules, regulations and Orders of the [
Coenission now or hereafter in effect.
O
$0' $00$ OSO
4
.p.
II.
By letter dated December 28. 1987, which discussed Revistor 3 of the TMI-2 Licensed Operator Requalification Progran, the licensee requested exer.ptiens frce requirernents of 10 CFR 55.59. 'Requalification." Specifically, the licensee requested exempticn from the requirerents of 10 UR 55.59(c)(2).
Lectures, subjects (iv)ard(v). Subsection (2) to 10 0.59(c) requires that the operator requalification progran centain preph:..ied lectures on a regular and continuirs tasis ttrcushout the license period ir, areas wherc emphasis in sccpe and depth of cov(rege is reeded. Nine topics are listed in the regulaticrs. The licensee has requested e>enption free. topics (iv) Plart prctecticnsystersand(v)Engineeredsafetysystems.
The Itcer.see has also requested esenption fron, 55.59(c)(3). On-the-Job Training, subsecticn (i), iten:s (A) through (AA). The regulations require under 55.50(c)(3) that the requalificatien program fr-lude on-the-fet training so that each licensed operator naripulates the plant centrols and each licensed stnict crerator either ranipulates the centrcls or directs the activities of individuals durirg plant control ranipulations. The ranipulation rest censist of a set of specified ranipulations corresponding to various plant evoluttens applicable to the plant design. Section10CFR55.59(c)(3)(1)(A)through(AA) specifies the various plant evolutions for which all operators will tt required to ranipulate the facility contmls arrually or in scoe cases biannually during the terr. of the licensed operator's or senior operator's k x l
i
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i
license. They can be performed at the plant or on a simulator. The manipulations required include plant startup, plant shutdown, manual control of feedwater, loss of coolant events, turbine trip, reactor trip, and loss of electric power.
III.
TMI-2 is currently in a post-accident, cold shutdown, long-tern cleanup mcde, with sufficient decay heat removal assured by direct heat loss from the reactor coolant system to the reactor building atmosphere. The licensae is presently engaged in defueling the damaged reactor, decontaminating the facility and readying the plant for long-term storage. The requirements to maintain safety related systems have been deleted from the TMI-2 operating license. The present unconventional configuration of the TMI-2 plant does not allow the conventional evolutions normcl to an operating facility.
The licensee has requested exemption from the requirement to include preplanned lectures in the requalification program throughout the individual's license period on Plant Protection Systems and Engineering $afety Systems.
The Reactor Protection and the Engineering Safety Features Actuation System constitute the Plant Protection Systems at TMI-2. Both of these systems have been disabled. The Reactor Protection System is currently used only for plant monitoring, The monitoring capability of the portions of the system that are still functioning are addressed in the "Plant Instrumentation and Control Systems" lecture.
s There currently is no requirement in the TMI-2 license to maintain the the Engineered Safety Features Actuation System and no training on this system is included in the requalification program.
The licensee has also requested that they be exempted from control manipulations required by 10 CFR 55.59(c)(3)(1), subsections (A) through (AA). In lieu of the requirements to perfom the specific manipulations required by the regulations, the licensee has included in the TMI-2 Licensed Oper6 tor Requalificatien Training Program abncmal and emergency evolutions that are applicable to TMI-2 in its current condition. These evolutions provide a more neaningful requalification training program for the TMI-2 licensed operators. The licensce believes that the current requalification program, which specifies completion of specific evolutions through the plant drill progran;, satisfies the intent of the regulation.
Verification by an NRC subject matter expert has confirmed that exemptions to the requirements of 10 CFR 55.59(c)(2) and 10 CFR 55.59(c)(3)(1) are appropriate and relevant to the present condition of TMI-2.
!Y.
Accordingly, the Coninission has determined that pursuant to 10 CFR 55.11, these exemptions are authorized by law, will not endanger life or property
~
property and are otherwise in the public interest.
Accordingly, the Corsnission hereby grants exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 55.69(c)(2), sabsections (iv) and (v), and 10 CFR Part 55.59(c)(3)(1) items (A)through(AA),
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Comission has determined that granting of this exemption will have no significant impact on the environment (53 FR 33562).
This exemption is effective as of the date of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR EGULATORY COMMISSION
. en . a' t Division of Reactor Pr j cts I/II Office of Nuclear Reac Regulation Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 31st day of August,1988.
4 f
__ ___ .__.__-_._. _ _______ _ _ _ . _ _