ML20198D419
Text
i b
1.
Allegation Category: QA/QC 4, Training and Qualification 2.
Allegation Number: AQ-73 3.
Characterization:
It is alleged that. document control clerks received poor training regarding how to process travelera and other types of documentation.
4.
Assessment of Safety Significance:
The NRC Technical Review Team (TRT) found that document control clerks were responsible for: (1) receiving s
controlled documents and assuring that the correct document number, revi-sion number, number of copies, and all design changes had been incorporated
~
and entered into the design change log book; (2) assuring that all packages requiring travelers had the correct traveler number and date; (3) assuring that issued document packages were complete; and (4) entering the informa-tion into the checkout log used by the document control center (DCC) satellites to assure that complete document packages were returned to the 7
files.
The TRT reviewed Brown & Root (B&R) procedure DCP-3, "CPSES Document Con-trol Program" (all revisions), and training records for ten document con-a trol clerks.
These records were taken randomly for personnel using time sheets dating from July 1981, to the time of the TRT review.
A formal training and testing program was outlined in DCP-3, Rev.16, for the first i
time; therefore, July 1981, was chosen by the TRT to assure that the period prior to DCP-3, Rev. 16, was reviewed.
The TRT also interviewed five DCC clerks who were emloyed prior to August 1983.
The TRT found no record of any formal orientation or training of the 15 document control clerks prior v
to the issuance of DCP-3, Rev. 16 (August 5, 1983); however, the 5 DCC s
clerks interviewed stated that they had received some informal on-the-job training following the issuance of Rev. 16 to DCP-3; however, records indi-cated that all' document control clerks received formal orientation and r
training and were tested. regarding the requirements of DCP-3 and its later revisions.
5.
Conclusion and Staff Positions: Based on a review of B&R procedure DCP-3 and a sample of training records for DCC personnel, the TRT concludes that this allegation is substantiated.
The TRT found no evidence of any r
type of formal training program for document control clerks prior to DCP-3, Rev. 16 (August 1983).
=
A letter summ'arizing the TRT findings regarding these concerns has been
=-
sent to the alleger.
No exit interview will be conducted.
~
- ), p
?.
- ; pt '. _'
=
- .T.
k :..
m L
~ 8605230249 860512 0-129
{PDR FOIA s GARDE 85-89.
.PDR.
7.
Attachments: None.
Reference Documents:
1.
Brown & Root procedure DCP-3, all revisions.
2.
Training records for ten document control clerks.
3.
Interviews with five DCC clerks.
4.
A-2 Interview, pp. 88-90 8.
This statement prepared by:
)f m (A).
0!S!MI V. Watson, TRT Dat'e /
Technical Reviewer Reviewed by:
b2/ut/1E N ~7-IfI Herb ~ert Livermore Date Group Leader Approved by:
Vincent Noonan Date Project Director 1
l-I' i
0-130 l
. -.