NRC Operator Licensing Exam Rept 50-128/OL-98-02 (Including Completed & Graded Tests) for Retake Exam Administered on 980914 to One Reactor Operator Candidate.Candidate Passed ExamML20154F560 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
05000128 |
---|
Issue date: |
09/18/1998 |
---|
From: |
Doyle P NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20154F545 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
50-128-OL-98-02, 50-128-OL-98-2, NUDOCS 9810090262 |
Download: ML20154F560 (9) |
|
|
---|
Category:EXAMINATION REPORT
MONTHYEARML20195J4851999-06-0303 June 1999 NRC Operator Licensing Exam Rept 50-128/OL-99-01 (Including Completed & Graded Tests) for Tests Administered on 990405- 06.Exam Results:Both Candidates Failed Written Portion of Exams ML20154F5601998-09-18018 September 1998 NRC Operator Licensing Exam Rept 50-128/OL-98-02 (Including Completed & Graded Tests) for Retake Exam Administered on 980914 to One Reactor Operator Candidate.Candidate Passed Exam ML20217B2151997-09-0303 September 1997 NRC Operator Licensing Exam Rept 50-128/OL-97-02 Including Completed & Graded Tests for Tests Administered on 970825- 26.Exam Results:One RO & One SRO Passed Exam.Two ROs Failed Exam ML20137L3411997-04-0101 April 1997 NRC Operator Licensing Retake Exam Rept 50-128/OL-97-01 on 970324.Applicant Passed Category B.Categories a & C Were Waived ML20135E9551996-12-0303 December 1996 NRC Operator Licensing Exam Rept 50-128/OL-96-02 Administered on 961119-21.Exam Results:Four Applicants Passed Exam & One Applicant Failed Exam ML20059G3171993-12-0909 December 1993 Exam Rept 50-128/OL-93-03 on Stated Date.Exam Results: Candidate Successfully Passed SRO Upgrade Exam ML20056C4571993-06-0707 June 1993 Exam Rept 50-128/OL-93-02 on 930518.Exam Results:Applicant Passed Both Written Exam & Operating Evaluation 1999-06-03
[Table view] Category:TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
MONTHYEARIR 05000128/19992011999-07-0909 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-128/99-201 on 990608-10.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Selected Conditions & Records Since Last Insp,Verification of C/A Previously Committed to by Licensee ML20195J4851999-06-0303 June 1999 NRC Operator Licensing Exam Rept 50-128/OL-99-01 (Including Completed & Graded Tests) for Tests Administered on 990405- 06.Exam Results:Both Candidates Failed Written Portion of Exams IR 05000128/19972011998-12-0808 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-128/97-201 on 971103-05 & 981102-05.No Significant Safety Issues Were Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Selected Conditions & Records Since Last Insp, Verification of C/As & Actions Re Reportable Occurences ML20154F5601998-09-18018 September 1998 NRC Operator Licensing Exam Rept 50-128/OL-98-02 (Including Completed & Graded Tests) for Retake Exam Administered on 980914 to One Reactor Operator Candidate.Candidate Passed Exam ML20217B2151997-09-0303 September 1997 NRC Operator Licensing Exam Rept 50-128/OL-97-02 Including Completed & Graded Tests for Tests Administered on 970825- 26.Exam Results:One RO & One SRO Passed Exam.Two ROs Failed Exam ML20198F9791997-08-11011 August 1997 Revised NOV from Insp on 970317-21.Violation Noted:Adequate Radiation Surveys Were Not Performed in Waste Storage Bldg to Ensure Licensee Complied W/Requirements of 10CFR20.1201, 10CFR20.1601 & 10CFR20.1902(b).NRC Comments Attached ML20148F1391997-05-29029 May 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970317-21.Violation Noted: No Lectures Were Scheduled Between 951018 & 960714 & One or More Reactor Operators Did Not Attend Four Lectures That Were Part of Requalification Program in 1996 IR 05000128/19970011997-05-29029 May 1997 Insp Rept 50-128/97-01 on 970317-21.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Reactor Requalification,Reactor Safety Board Activities,Reactor Mods,Facility Mods & Plant Support ML20137L3411997-04-0101 April 1997 NRC Operator Licensing Retake Exam Rept 50-128/OL-97-01 on 970324.Applicant Passed Category B.Categories a & C Were Waived ML20135E9551996-12-0303 December 1996 NRC Operator Licensing Exam Rept 50-128/OL-96-02 Administered on 961119-21.Exam Results:Four Applicants Passed Exam & One Applicant Failed Exam ML20059G3171993-12-0909 December 1993 Exam Rept 50-128/OL-93-03 on Stated Date.Exam Results: Candidate Successfully Passed SRO Upgrade Exam ML20056C4571993-06-0707 June 1993 Exam Rept 50-128/OL-93-02 on 930518.Exam Results:Applicant Passed Both Written Exam & Operating Evaluation ML20035E9481993-04-0101 April 1993 Insp Rept 50-128/93-01 on 930315-16.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Planning & Preparedness, Security Plans & Procedures & Reviews ML20034C1171990-04-17017 April 1990 Notice of Violation from Insp on 900221-23.Violation Noted: Licensee Transferred 80 Mci Na-24 to Company in Oct 1989 W/O Verifying Authorization for Possession of Matl ML20034C1211990-04-13013 April 1990 Insp Rept 50-128/90-02 on 900221-23.Violation & Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program IR 05000128/19900011990-02-21021 February 1990 Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-128/90-01 on 900110-12 (Ref 10CFR2.790(d)).Violation Noted Re Failure to Test Personnel on Security Training.Major Areas Inspected:Organization & Mgt Controls,Experiments & Physical Security & Safeguards ML20151F0381988-07-13013 July 1988 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $5,000.Violations Noted:Failure to Provide Experimenter Working in High Radiation Area Containing Mixed Gamma Neutron Radiation Field W/Monitoring Equipment ML20151G2471988-07-0808 July 1988 EN-88-058:on 880708,notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $5,000 Issued to Licensee Based on Failure to Provide Appropriate Personnel Dosimetry,Proper Placement of Personnel Dosimetry & Establish Proper Control IR 05000128/19880031988-05-25025 May 1988 Insp Rept 50-128/88-03 on 880411-12.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Radiation Protection Program, Radiological Surveys Including Independent Radiation Spectrum Measurements of Reactor Beam Port 1 IR 05000128/19880021988-04-28028 April 1988 Insp Rept 50-128/88-02 on 880405-07.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review & Audit, Experiments,Procedures,Organization,Logs & Records,Plant Status,Requalification Program,Surveillance & Site Tour ML20148M5851988-03-30030 March 1988 Insp Rept 50-128/88-01 on 880307-09.Five Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Radiation Protection, Emergency Planning,Nuclear Matl Safeguards & Physical Security Programs ML20212P5491987-03-11011 March 1987 Notice of Violation from Insp on 870112-14 ML20212K9471987-01-12012 January 1987 Enforcement Notification EN-86-057A:order Imposing Civil Penalty in Reduced Amount of $833 Issued Based on Util Justification for Withdrawal of One Violation Re 860501 Power Excursion & Trip PNO-IV-86-036, on 861218,three Student Workers Became Contaminated During Removal of Offgas from Recently Irradiated Br-82 Samples.Airborne Monitors Alarmed & Reactor Bldg Evacuated.Students Decontaminated1986-12-19019 December 1986 PNO-IV-86-036:on 861218,three Student Workers Became Contaminated During Removal of Offgas from Recently Irradiated Br-82 Samples.Airborne Monitors Alarmed & Reactor Bldg Evacuated.Students Decontaminated IR 05000128/19860021986-09-0303 September 1986 Insp Rept 50-128/86-02 on 860729-30.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Logs,Organization, Review & Audit Functions,Requalification Training, Procedures,Surveillance Activities & Experiments ML20211Q9921986-07-22022 July 1986 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $1,250.Violations Noted:Nonsecured Experiment Removed from Reactor Core Position B-5 While Reactor Operating ML20207H7781986-07-17017 July 1986 EN-86-057:on 860722,notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $1,250 Will Be Issued to Licensee.Action Based on 860501 Power Excursion & Resultant Overpower Trip Event IR 05000128/19860011986-05-0909 May 1986 Reactive Insp Rept 50-128/86-01 on 860505.Violation Noted: Failure to Measure Reactivity Worth of Experiment Before Reactor Operation & to Rept Reactivity Greater than One Dollar Associated w/860310 Event PNO-IV-86-016, on 860501,test Sample Removed from Reactor, Causing Unanticipated Reactivity Addition in Excess of Tech Specs & Resulting in Reactor Scram on High Power on Both Safety Channels1986-05-0202 May 1986 PNO-IV-86-016:on 860501,test Sample Removed from Reactor, Causing Unanticipated Reactivity Addition in Excess of Tech Specs & Resulting in Reactor Scram on High Power on Both Safety Channels IR 05000128/19820021982-10-18018 October 1982 IE Insp Rept 50-128/82-02 on 820621-25.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Operation,Organization, Reactor Safety Board Audits,Logs,Experiments,Maint Calibr of Test Equipment,Emergency Planning & Site Tour IR 05000128/19820011982-07-0606 July 1982 IE Insp Rept 50-128/82-01 on 820604.No Noncompliance Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Facts & Circumstances Re Reported Beta/Gamma Radiation Exposure of 180 Rem to Right Hand TLD for Reactor Operator.Max Exposure Approx 2.5 Rem PNO-IV-82-017, on 820518,dosimetry Vendor Informed That Finger Badge from Reactor Operator Read 180 Rem (Gamma).Work Performed by Operator in Late Apr 1982 Involved Handling of Activation Products in Reactor Bldg1982-05-19019 May 1982 PNO-IV-82-017:on 820518,dosimetry Vendor Informed That Finger Badge from Reactor Operator Read 180 Rem (Gamma).Work Performed by Operator in Late Apr 1982 Involved Handling of Activation Products in Reactor Bldg PNO-IV-81-020, on 810721 Release of Gaseous Fission Products Occurred During Irradiation of Chlorine Sample in Long Tube. Max Concentration Less than Tech Specs.No Overexposure or Contamination Occurred.Media Has Been Notified1981-07-22022 July 1981 PNO-IV-81-020:on 810721 Release of Gaseous Fission Products Occurred During Irradiation of Chlorine Sample in Long Tube. Max Concentration Less than Tech Specs.No Overexposure or Contamination Occurred.Media Has Been Notified PNO-IV-80-026, on 800821,irradiated Sample Container Exploded & Three Experimenters Suffered Small Cuts Which Were Successfully Decontaminated.Property Damage Was Minimal & Decontamination Is in Progress1980-08-21021 August 1980 PNO-IV-80-026:on 800821,irradiated Sample Container Exploded & Three Experimenters Suffered Small Cuts Which Were Successfully Decontaminated.Property Damage Was Minimal & Decontamination Is in Progress IR 05000128/19800021980-05-0808 May 1980 IE Insp Rept 50-128/80-02 on 800423-25.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Security Plan,Protection of SNM, Security Organization & Access Control.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) IR 05000128/19800011980-04-0101 April 1980 IE Insp Rept 50-128/80-01 on 800304-06.Noncompliance Noted: Failure to Maintain Std Operating Procedures 1999-07-09
[Table view] |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:7
\\
~
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- QPERATOR LICENSING !NITIAL EXAMINATION REPORT
. REPORT NO.:
50-128/OL-98-02 FACILITY DOCKET NO.:
50-128
' FACILITY LICENSE NO.:
R--83 FACILITY:
Texas A&M University EXAMINATION DATES:
September 14,1998 EXAMINER:
Paul Doyle, C 'ef Ex iner
'!~s 7-/I4 6 SUBMITTED BY:
Paul Doyle7 Chief E ner Date F
SUMMARY
On September 14,1998, one reactor operator candidate completed an NRC prepared retake examination. The candidate passed the examination. In a phone conversation Alfred Sanchez (Texas A&M) told Paul Doyle (NRC) that the facility had no comments on the NRC prepared examination.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Examiner: Paul Doyle, Chief Examiner
' 2.-
Results:
RO PASS / FAIL SRO PASS / Fall TOTAL PASS / Fall Written 1/0 N/A 1/0 Operating Tests N/A N/A N/A Overall 1/0 N/A N/A 3.
Exit Meeting: There was no exit meeting.
9810090262 990922 3
PDR ADOCK 05000128 I
V PM
i f
n 1
i United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operator Licensing Examination
.y.-,,,
..,. ~, _,.
,y,,,,.,
l 1:
x s.
[=
~ ',..
".l l
,,.-{ '
t
.K q-I t. ;', 3 ' ]-;
,e
^
- VW
< - 1 a
r g
iq i; >, 4 i
i 4
'f i
.i a
(
)
i i
e, 3
i 3
j
,, 3 4
1 1
5 s
si w
.mp
- ! -.3 l
i q
i y
i g
s i
2 e
4 1
s.
Texas A&M University Week of 09/14/98 4
4
<i 1
)
F cility cnd Rtdi: tion Monitoring Systems Pega 2 QUESTION (C.1) [2.0,0.33 each]
Using the figure of an Instrumented Fuel Element provided, match the components identified by the letter on the drawing in column A with the correct names listed in column B.
Column A Column B a.
A
-1.
Input from Cell T, J
' b.
B 2.
Input from Pool T, c.
C 3.
Input from Mode Selector Switch d.
D 4.
Digital Indicator (DORIC) e.
E 5.
Fuel Temp Recorder f.
F 6.
Disconnects at the R bridge QUESTION (C.2) [2 points,0.33 eachl Using the figure of the Liquid Waste Disposal System provided, Identify the valve positions of the listed valves when lined up to ' stir' the tank identified as B.
(O = open, C = closed)
I a.
CW b.
CW-4 c.
W S-4 d.
WS-1 e.
LW-1 f.
LW-7 QUESTION (C.3) [1.0 point]
On a decreasing poollevel, the University communications room will receive an alarm. What other automatic action will occur?
' a.
Recirculation pump trip, b.
Skimmer pump trip, c.
Core diffuser pump trip
-d.
Purification pump trip.
Fccility cnd R*diation Monitoring Syst:ms P:Go 3 QUESTION (C.4) [1.0 point]
On a decreasing pool level the SRO directs you (after scramming reactor) to line Makeup to the pool via the demineralizer system at 100 gpm. Procedure V.A Operation of the Deminera//zer System cautions you not to exceed 70 gpm through the demineralizer. At the higher (100 gpm) rate you run the risk of..
a.
blowing resin out of the demineralizer into the pool b.
creating channels through the demineralizer.
c.
over pressuring the demineralizer.
d.
blowing the filter upstream of the demineralizer into the demineralizer.
QUESTION (C.5) [1.0 point)
Why is Erbium added to FLIP fuel?
Erbium improves the overall heat transfer coefficient of the fuel necessary due to higher a.
temperatures generated when pulsing FLIP fuel.
b.
Erbium both acts os a burnable poison (so that more fuel may be added), and as a resonance absorber (enhancing prompt negative temperature coefficient).
c, Erbium acts as a burnable poison only (so that more fuel may be added).
d.
Erbium acts as a resonance absorber only (enhancing prompt negative temperature coefficient).
QUESTION (C.6) [1.0 point]
Which one of the following is the reason that the control rods have FUELER followers?
a.
To enhance their control characteristics.
b.
To increase the effectiveness for reactor pulsing.
c.
To provide excess reactivity and extend core life, To decrease ' he Core Excess.
d.
t
^
Facility end Radiation Monitoring Systsms Page 4
' QUESTION (C.7) (1.0 point]
How is the amount of reactivity inserted during a pulse adjusted?
a.
The transient rod is at the bottom of its travel and a stopper is adjusted to determine how far out the rod may move.
1 b.
The transient rod is moved to a predetermined position out of the core and the pulse worth is due to ejecting the rod the rest of the way out of the core.
c.
The pressure of tha air is adjusted to counteract a spring holding the rod at the bottom of the' core, a calibrated amount.
d.
A timing circuit on the _ air supply is adjusted to inject air, driving the rod out for an amount of time calibrated to the distance required.
T QUESTION (C.8) [1.0 point]
The facility is divided into three zones of negative pressure for isolation of contaminated area. Rate each of the three areas given (beam ports (BP), control room (CR) and main resaarch areas (MRA) from LEAST negative pressure to MOST negative pressure, a.
BP, CR, MRA b.
BP,MRA,CR c.
CR, MRA, BP d.
CR, BP, MRA QUESTION. (C.9) [1.0 point]
'What gas is used in the pneumatic tube experiment system?
' a.
Air b.
Ar
'c '
N 2 d.
CO2 4
)
p
_m, m.
)
r J
Facility end Rtdistion Monitoring Systems Pagn 5 t
1 L
' QUESTION ' (C.10) [1.0 point]
Which of the pool water systems would do the most to minimize activation of D/SSOLVED impurities in the primary coolant?
I a.
Pool Recirculation System b.
Pool Purification System c.
Pool Diffuser System d.
Pool Skimmer system QUESTION (C.11) [2.0 points,0.5 each]
j
' Identify each of the beam ports listed in column A with the correct type in column B. Note, items in column B may be used more than once or not ai all.
Column A Column B a.
1 1.
Radial b.
3 2.
Through Tube c.
4 3.
Weighted extensions tubes l
d.
6 4.
Bismuth Trough may be suspended from tip.
1
)
l QUESTION. (C.12) l.
Which ONE of the following is the purpose of the graphite slugs located at the top and bottom of each fuel rod?
a.
' To absorb neutrons, thereby reducing neutron embrittlement of the upper and lower guide plates.
l-
- b.-
To ' absorb neutrons, thereby reducing neutron leakage from the core.
c.
To reflect neutrons, thereby reducing neutron leakage from the core, d.
To couple neutrons from the core to the nuclear instrumentation, thereby decreasing neutron j
shadowing effects.
i l-e i
l l
to g
Fccility end R:distion Monitoring'Systsms Page 6 OUESTION (C.13)
Which ONE of the following is the result of taking the mode selector switch to PULSE?
l a.
Defeat the 2 counts per second control rod interlock.
I b.
Defeat the 3 second period scram.
i
.c.
Defeat the 1000 Kwatt interlock.
Defeat the Fuel Temperature Scram.
d.
q QUESTION (C.14)
The fission product monitor is designed with a low sensitivity to gases to eliminate high detector
)
backgrounds due to...
i a.
Argon" es b.
Krypton c.
. Xenon"8 d.
Radonras 1
QUESTION (C.15)
Which ONE of the following is the correct method used to determine rod position from 0 to 100%?
e.
A logic circuit receives input from the two sensors which count 100 pulses per revolution aad detect direction, converting this to a rod position, b.
A synchronous motor which is connected by a chain drive to the drive motor generates a signal, which in turn moves a servo motor, generating a signal proportional to rod position.
c.
As the magnet moves up and down, it closes a series of 10,000 limit switches which
- generates a signal which is converted to rod position.
d.
As the motor turns the lead screw moves up and down into a coil generating a signal proportional to rod position.
5-
Frcility and Rrdiction Monitoring Systems Page 7 QUESTION (C.16)
Which ONE of the following is the method you should use (as the console operator) to sound the ventilation alarm if the solenoid valve was inadvertently left shut in the reception room?
a.
The normal switch on the control panel should still work.
b.
- Open a " bypass" valve located in the control room.
c.
Open a " bypass" valve located just inside the door leading out of containment, d.
Override the solenoid signal via a switch located in the back of the reactor console.
QUESTION (C.17)
The pulsing circuit utilizes a...
. a.
Fission chamber b.
Compensated lon Chamber c.
Uncompensated lon Chamber -
d,-
Geiger-Moller Chamber i
t l
I I-t w.
C Facility cnd R:distion Monitoring Systsms Pago 8 (C.1) a, 6; b,1 or 2; c 1 or 2; d, 3; e, 4; f, 5 REFERENCE SAR, Figure 7-4, p. 97.
L (C.2) a, 0; b, C; c, 0; d, 0; e, C; f, C REFERENCE SOP V11, C.9, Radioactive Waste Disposal (C.3)~ a REFERENCE SAR, BVill, G.1, p.112
-(C.4) b REFERENCE SOP V.A, i 1.g, p. 5 (C.5) b-REFERENCE SAR p. 50.
(C.6) c REFERENCE SAR pp.10, 22.
(C.7) a REFERENCE SAR p. 38.
(C.8) c REFERENCE SAR p. 79 (C.9) d REFERENCE SOP IV C. p.1.
(C.10) b REFERENCE TS 3.8, p. 29 (C.11) a, 4; b,1; c, 4; d, 3; REFERENCE SAR 6 VI. A.2. p. 83.
. (C.12) c REFERENCE SAR l ill.B.412, p.14.
(C.13) b REFERENCE SAR 5 5 Vll.B.(1) and (2), pp. 91 - 96.
(C.14) a REFERENCE SAR l IX F, 5* 1, p.119.
(C.15) a REFERENCE Modification M-46 l
[
(C.16) b REFERENCE Standard Operating Procedure lil-R, p.1, step 2.
(C.17) c REFERENCE Standard Operating Procedure ill-F, p.1. Also, SAR 6 Vll.B.2, p. 96.
..}}