ML20034C117
| ML20034C117 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000128 |
| Issue date: | 04/17/1990 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20034C115 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-128-90-02, 50-128-90-2, NUDOCS 9005020075 | |
| Download: ML20034C117 (1) | |
Text
,-
=,
APPENDIX A i
Texas Engineering Experiment Station Docket:
50-128/90-02 f
Texas A&M University Operating License:
R-83 During an NRC inspection conducted on February 21-23, 1990, a violation of NRC.
L requirements was identified. The violation involved the failure to verify that a recipient of byproduct material was properly licensed to receive such material.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989) (Enforcement-l Policy), the violation is listed below:
l Verification of Valid Byproduct Material License 10 CFR 30.41(c) requires that before transferring byproduct material to a licensee, the licensee transferring.the material shall verify that the I
transferee's license authorizes the receipt of the material.
10 CFR 30.41(d) lists the methods of verification which may.be used by the transferor.
Contrary to the above, on February 23, 1990, the inspector identified that the licensee transferred 80 mil 11 curies of radioactive sodium (Na-24) to a company in October 1989 without verifying that the company was authorized-to possess the transferred material.
This is a Severity Level V violation.
(Supplement V) (128/9002-01)
~
I Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Texas Engineering Experiment Station is hereby required to submit to this office, within 30' days of.the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further.
violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given.to extending the.. response time.
Dated at Arlington, Texas, this lq g day of Q
1990
- g?1885MSYb?
a