ML20154E133

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Review of Against Questions Sent to Breaux/Simpson on 880301 & Also Against Last Version of Questions Sent to EDO & Ofc of Congressional Affairs
ML20154E133
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/10/1988
From: Rehm T
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
Shared Package
ML20154D958 List:
References
FOIA-88-237 NUDOCS 8809160222
Download: ML20154E133 (5)
v • d • e


Text

07/8G/EG 10t27 tfic HO. W3TE FLINT ELEC. C02

  • :.'; \ *, T. C '. '.

. March 10, 1988 ND60RMOUM TOR: James M. Taylor Ocputy Executive Director ,

for Operations l

FROM: T. A. Rahm*

Assistant foe Cperations Office of the Executive Otractor.for Operations SU5 JECT:' LETTER FORTUNA/ WARD TO PAYES, DATED t%RCH 7, 2988 l

I have reviewed the referenced letter against copies of the . 'estions sent to l neeeux/51rnpson March 1, 1933 and also against the last versivo of the l questions sent by CECO to OCA (approxite.ately 2/18/08).

l 1. All the cuestions noted in the refsrenced 01 Yetter were edited at H I

Street and all differed in some respect frten the last draf t seen by 01 and transmitted by OEDO to OCA.

7. According to my notes, all the questions referenced in the 01 letter ware revtewed by R. Fortuna on or about 2/18/S8. Fortuna did not request i changes to any cf these questions, althcugh he did request shanges to l several others in the package he riviewed.
3. The word "generally" in Question 22 was in the package Fortuna reviewed.

At the tim I was particularly con:orned that the later part of the respunse reflect I: ayes vitn word by wor 1J and ! felt there was a ptissibility some change night have been inserted. I particularly asked 01 tu leak carafully at that response to assure Hayes words had not teen changed as ! no longer had the original to check agstnst.

4 I co not have the oricinal 01 s*:tcittsis to check against, or OED0's stfits se:Onst thst co;y. I recs 11 ths3e was consider:ble verbiage in the originst O! subittsis that unnt tayond antuering the direct question. l

5. With the exception of Quettien 22 the tcmtssion response to Cengress appears to ne responsive and correct and not in any way titslasding.

Questien 22 sneul_r1 have : aid exactly ' shat l' ayes wrote; apparen:1y neither Fcrtuna or 1 picked up the error. l T. A. R M , J0/0! 0 8809160222 000030 l ETO80237 0 PDR />.

/~*C/A .a! -Jk C.

07/1E4 3 10t rl hRC HQ. WHl1E FLINT ELDG. CO3 2

March 10, 1988 NEMORAMMDi FOR: ' Jarres (1. Taylor .

D puty Executive Director ,

for Operations FRON: T. A. Rahr Assistant for Operations Office of the Executive Directer for 0porations

$UBJECT: LETTER FORTUMA/ WARD TO liAYES, DATIO K'RCH 7,1989 I have reviewed the referenced letter against copies of the questions sent *.0 Breaux/tirpson 'darch 1.1923 and also against the last version of the

uestions sent by O!DO to OCA (approximstely 2/10/08).
1. All the questions nvted in the referenced O! letter were edited at H Streat and all differed in sene respect frem the last draf t seen by 01 and transmitted by OEDO to CCA.

2 According to ry notes, all the questions referenced in the 0! letter were reviewed by R. Fortuna on or abcut 2/18/88. Fortuna cid not request changes to any of these questions, although he di_d request changts to several others in the p3ckage he reviesed..

3. The wrd generally" in Question ?? was in the sackage Fortuna reviewed.

At the tire I was particularly concerned that t,e later part of the respense reflect Hayes views word by wcrd, and I felt there was a l

ressibility stce chance xiignt hsve been interted. I particular'y asked O! to look car 1 fully at that respense to assure itay2s words had not been i changed t.s ! na longer had the original to check cg31rst.

4 I do not havn the original O! sutetttais to check against, or DEC'0's edits against that ccpy. I recall these was censiderable verbiage in the origins) 01 sutt itt.11s that trent dayond answering the direct question.

5. Uith the exception cf Questico 02, the Ccminion responte to Cengress yper.rs to N restesive and corre:t and not in any u:y t11sleading.

A ssti:n 22 g g h n- :sid exactly tthat H3yes wrotet arpatently neither l F:rttna or I p.cted up ti.e error.

T. A. 3:6 . A0/CE.N

~

Ors  : ho[G"J .  :  :  :  :

N.1?! :T.1;h-  :  :  :  :  :

=

MTE +3 G LqS  :  : t  : t 07ftC UL 4,CCo.U CCri

(r7/1848 10:29 PRC H3, LHITE FLINT Et.IG. 004  :

i i

]

3.. t l

0uestien 16tF) l Misleadig connent by O!. It 45 true (I assume) there was an SM; but that .

I does not enser the question. .The $RM caune to be because of the circumstances I i stated (Rmeritten here and downtwn). Response as edited OK. ,

1 RJestion18(C)

The adjestment was enade downtoe n. 1 can't access right or wrong.

@astion Q Heavily edited downtown. It is entirely correct es edited. l j

Doestic_n__Q Taylor did ettensive rewrite. Rewritten also downtpwn. The offensive word D enerally" is in both versie_ns so the was here nevertheless, fortuna did i review and leave in. I'm note sure its that by a deal.

,Qestion24 l

l Slightly edited dcwntown. The St carment is nonsens_e. t i

I I

I i

i, i

r

(

,i

4.a*
  • j%,

f a y r, 5 I  : UNITED STATss

, NUCl. EAR TON, REGULATORY f COMMISSION gf(( 4 k ...... .

'"' ': r L; U WA $HING D. C. 2Mll

' &J March 10,1988 w -

MEMORANDUM FOR: James M. Taylor $g.

opns:

Deputy Executive Ofrector for Operations _ oi:ti FROM: _ 0t - --

T. A. Rehm - f,([,'- ,1; Assistant for Operations Office of the Executive ~ [. . ~~ ~ ~ ~

,,_. FC %

Director for Operations -

SUBJECT:

I

\

LETTER FORTUNA/ WARD c

, 1988 TO MAYES, D Breaux/Simpson March 1,1983 and also a1 have questions sent by OEDO to OCA 1.

gainst (approximatel the last ve ston of thenst copie y 2/18/88).

$treet and all differed inetter and transmitted by OEDO to OCA.

some respect fall the were edited at H~

2. rom the last draft seen by OI According to ny notes, all the question were reviewed changes by R.questions to any of these Ft;rtuna on

/88 or about 2/18s referenced in 3 several others in the package althoughhe r,eviewed f

he dif request changes toFort At the tire I was particularly concerThe word ' gen respense reflect Hayes views word by word pcssibility some change mighten ned have that be the later part of theas in inserted., and I felt ther+ was a O! to look carefully at that response Itoparticularly asked 4 changed as I no longer had the assure original to had not been Hayes words I do not have the ortgin check against.

edits against that copy.al O! submittals to check against 5 original 01 sutetttals that went I recall thesebeyond answ was constderable,verbiag or OED0's e in W1th the exception of Question 22 ering the direct question.the Ovestion 22 should have said exactly Fortuna or ZWd up the error ct and not ayes in any way misleading. ss re what Happ

}

otes apparently neither 4

T. A.

M/0E00

?-

l p uA-tt' m,(!!'

Ouestion 16(F) l Misleading cceent by 01. It is true (I assume) there was an SRM; but that  ;

does not answer the question. The 5RM came to be because of the circumstances >

s stated (Rewritten here and downtown). Response ss edited OK.

! r Ouestion 18(C) 4 The adjustment was made downtown. !_can't access richt or wrono.

i l Question ?! l t

i Heavily edited dentown. It is entirely correct as edited.  !

l Question 22  !

I Taylor did extensive rewrite. Rewritten also downtown. The offensive word  ;

"centrally" is in both versions, so the was here nevertheless. Fortuna did review and leave in. I'm note sure its that by a deal.  ;

r

{ Ouestion 24 l Slightly edited downtown. The 0! eerrent is nonsense.

1 I

) ,

l t

5 i

I l

2

_ - - _ --- -___- _ . . - .- . --_ . .- __

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20154E133&oldid=3352194"