ML20137N375
| ML20137N375 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1996 |
| From: | Jamila Perry COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| JSPLTR-#97-0061, JSPLTR-#97-61, NUDOCS 9704080347 | |
| Download: ML20137N375 (180) | |
Text
- T# Comm<cweakh Ikhwn Q>mpany f) ' Dresden Generatirig5tation
"' ' 6500 North Dreden Itoad
' Morris, II. (d)450 Tel 1415-912-2920 I
l March 28,1997 JSPLTR #97-0061 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l Attn: Document Control Desk l
Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
Subject:
Dresden Station Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Docket Numbers50-010,50-237, and 50-249 The purpose of this letter is to submit the Dresden Station Annual Radiological j Environmr.tal Operating Report. The attached report contains the results of the radiological environmental and meteorological monitoring programs for the 1996 !
calendar year. The Radioactive Efiluent Release Report was submitted under separate
]
cover.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please refer them to Mr. Cliff Howland, Dresden Station Radiation Protection Manager, at (815) 942-2920 :
extension 3481.
Sincerely yours, l
dp ek _
i S.)6 Vice President f Dresden Station
/
JSP/pc h
Enclosure 1 1
cc: See Attached Distribution j 1
9704000347 961231 I' 0rI' PDR ADOCK 05000010t i
R N g % $ ,E,E,% $
A Unicum Onmpan)
I
s ., a
>o, A. Bill Beach, Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region Ill 801 Warremille Road Lisle,IL 60532 Illinois Departm mt of Nuclear Safety Office of Emiros mental Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield,IL 62704 American Nuclear Insurers 29 South Main Street Suite 300S -
West Hartford, CT 06107 2445 U.S. Emironmental Protection Agency Air and Radiation Branch, Region V Heahh Physicist (AT-18J) 77 West Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604-3590 Murray & Trettel, Inc.
Environmental Meteorologist 414 West Frontage Road Northfield, IL 60093 Telcdyne Brown Engineering Emironmental Senices Midwest Laboratory General Manager 700 Landwehr Road Northbrook, IL 60062 Mr. Lou DelGeorge Vice President 37 FNE REMP Coordinator '
Health Physics Support Department Downers Grove -ETW 1118th Floor i
NRC Resident Inspector ,
Dresden >
IDNS Resident inspector [
Dresden REMP Coordinator Health Physics Dreulen l (2 copies) l
C ,
3 9
Ocncral Electric Co. !
Manager, Plant Services !
7555 East Collins Road 1 I
Morris,IL 60450 John Strang Dresden Station Project Manager <
USNRC l i
Mail Station PI 137
. Washington, DC 20555 i
l I
i
I 1
i s
[
DRESDEN STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING i r
REPORT l, 1996 f
1 I
I i
l l
l l
MARCH 1997 l
l l
.' > t
.. i
+
l TABLE OF CONTENTS !
i Eage j i
I NTRO D UCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4. . l
SUMMARY
.............................................................................................. 5 1.0 EFFLUENTS 1.1 Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosphere .................... ........ . .. .. ... ... . . . . . . . 6 ,
1.2 Liquids Released to Illinois River .. .. ...... . . .... ............ ..... . . . ............... .. . 6 (
i 2.0 SOLID RA DIOACTIVE WASTE................. ......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 i 3.0 DOSE TO MAN i 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pa thways ..... ......... ... .. . ..... ..... .... . ............ ..... . . . . . . . . . . 6 l 3.1.1 Noble G a ses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.1.1.1 Ga mma Dose Ra tes . . . . . ... . .. .... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ..... . . . .. . . . . 6 l 3.1.1.2 Beta Air and Skin Dose Ra tes................. ........................ ....... 7 :
3.1.2 Ra d ioa ctive lod ine . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 7 l 3.1.2.1 Iodine Concentrations in Air ... ..................... .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 +
3.1.2.2 Dose to Infant's Thyroid.. ..... ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 i 3.1.3 Concentrations of Particulates in Air........... . .... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
. 3.2 Li qu i d Ef fl u en t Pa thwa ys................. ....... ........ . ... ....... .. .. .. . .. . . .. . . . . 8 3.3 Assessment of Dose to Member of Public............................. ..... . ..... . .. .. 8 4.0 SITE M ETEO RO LOGY . . . . . . .. ..... .. ... . .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 5.1 Ga mma Radia tion ......... .. .... . .... ... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5.2 Airborne 1 131 and Particula te Radioactivity............. ................... ... . . .... ... 9 5.3 Aq u a tic Ra d ioact ivi ty............... ... . .. . . . ... ...... . .. ....... . . . ...... .. . . . . . . . .. 9 5.4 Milk........................................................................ .. 10 5.5 Special Collections.......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . 10 5.6 Li s t i n g o f M issed Sa m ples . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 11 5.7 Progra m M od i fica t ions . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. .. . . . .. . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6.0 AN A LYTICA L P ROC E DU R ES . . .. . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . ... ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 7.0 MILCH ANIMALS AND NEAREST CATTLE CENSUSES... ... . . . . . . 11 I i
a 8.0 NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS .... ........... .. . . . .. ... ... . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 !
9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS..... .. . ... . . . . . . 12 ,
J I
l l
I i
i I
l 2 j i
l l
i
. sH ~
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
Page !
1-1 APPENDIX 1 - DATA TABLES AND FIGURES.. . ........ ... .. .. . . .. .. ....... .... ..... ... .
Station Releases 7 Table 1.1-1 Gaseous Effluents ... .... . . . ... . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2 Table 1.2-1 Liquid Effluents .. .. .......... .. . .... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-4 4
Table 2.0-1 Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments.. ... .. . .. 1-6 Table 2.1-1 Abnormal Releases... .. ..... .. .... ... .. . .. . .... . . . . . . . . . . . I-8 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1-4 Isodose and Concentration Contours.. ..... ... .. . . . . . . 1 12 Table 3.1-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Airborne Releases.. .. . . .. 1-16 l Table 3.2-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Liquid Effluents... . . . 1-22 Table 3.3-1 10CFR20 Compliance Assessment. . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-24 Environmental Monitoring Figure 5.0-1 Inner Ring TLD Locations..... . .. . . . . . . . . ... . 1-30 Figure 5.0-2 Outer Ring TLD Locations... .. .. . .. . . .. ... . . .. . . . . . 1-31 Figure 5.0-3 Fixed Air Sampling and TLD Sites.. .. . . . . . . . . 1-32 Figure 5.0-4 Near Station Water Sample Locations.. .... .... .. . . . 1-33 Figure 5.0-5 Milk Sample Locations and More Distant Water Sam 31e Locations... ... .. . .... . .... .. ...... . . .. . . . . . . . 1 - 34 Table 5.0-1 Radiologica Environmental Monitoring Locations ... .. .... 1-35 T ble 5.0-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Sam ating Locations and Sample Collection and Ana yses... .... .. ... ... ......... ....... . . . . . . . . . . . 1-36 Table 5.0 Table 5.0-6 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Quarterly Summary...... ...... ..... .. . .. ... . . . . . 1-40 i Table 5.1-1 Gamma Radiation as measured by Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs)... . ... ....... . 1-52 APPENDIX 11 - METEOROLOGICAL DATA., .... ...... . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-1 APPENDIX 111 - LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES.. ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ill-1 APPENDIX IV - MILCH ANIMALS, NEAREST LIVESTOCK, AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUSES.. . .IV-1 APPENDIX V -INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS. V-1 A PPENDIX VI - ERR ATA DATA............ ........... ... ... . . .... .. ..... . . . . . . . VI-1 3
u r
INTRODUCTION The Dresden Station is located approximately twelve miles southwest of Joliet, Illinois at the confluence of the Des Plaines and Kankakee Rivers where they form the Illinois River. This station uses two boiling water reactors (G.E. design) to generate electricity. Unit 1, which began operating in 1960 and had a rated power output of 200 megawatts electrical (MWe), was shut down on August 31,1984 and is currently being decommissioned. Liquid radwaste from Unit 1 is transferred to Units 2 and 3 for collective processing and discharge. Units 2 and 3 began operating in 1970 and 1971, respectively, each with a net rated power output of 809 MWe. The General Electric Morris Operation Plant (CEMO) is located adjacent to Dresden.
Liquid effluents from Dresden are released to the Illinois River in controlled batches after radioassay of each batch. Gaseous effluents are released to the atmosphere after delay to permit decay of short-lived (noble) gases. Releases to the atmosphere are calculated on the basis of analyses of weekly grab samples of noble gases as well as continuously collected composite samples of iodine and particulate activity sampled during the course of the year. The results of effluent analyses are summarized on a monthly basis and reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as required per Technical Specifications. Airborne concentrations of noble gases, I-131, and particulate radioactivity in offsite e as are calculated using isotopic composition of l control effluent and meteorological data.
Environmental monitoring is conducted by sampling at indicator and control (background) locations in the vicinity of the Dresden Station to measure changes in radiation or radioactivity ,
levels that may be attributable to station operation. If significant changes attributable to l Dresden are measured, these changes are correlated with effluent releases. External gamma j radiation exposure from noble gases and internal dose from I-131 in milk are the critical i 1
pathways at this site; however, a comprehensive environmental monitoring program is
- conducted which includes many other pathways which are less significant in terms of radiation protection.
l 1
1 1
l l
4 j i
I
1 1
l.
SUMMARY
Gaseous and liquid effluents for the period remained below the Dresden Station Technical l Specification limits. Calculations of environmental concentrations based on effluent, Illinois :
I
. River flow, and meteorological data for the period indicate that consumption by the public of '
radioactive materials attributable to the Dresden Station does not exceed regulatory limits. -
Radiation exposure from radionuclides released to the atmosphere represented the critical j pathway for the period with a maximum adult dose estimated to be 1.45E-03 mrem for the year, where a shielding and occupancy factor of 0.7 is assumed. The assessment of radiation doses is l performed in accordance with the Comed Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). The I results of these analyses confirm that the station is operating in compliance with 10CFR50 )
Appendix I,10CFR20 and 40CFR190.
i f
I 1
I e
i 4
i i
i !
I h
{
i !
j l
i i
1 5 <
0 0 1.0 EFFLUENTS 1.1 Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosphere ,
Measured concentrations and isotopic composition of noble gases, radiciodine, and particulate radioactivity released to the atmosphcre during the year are listed in Table 1.1-1. No measurable amount of noble gases was released from Dresden Unit 1 and a total of 6.58E+01 curies of noble gases with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 5.90 pCi/sec was released from Dresden Units 2 and 3.
A total of 1.30E-03 curies of I-131 was released during the year with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 7.17E-5 pCi/sec.
A total of 2.15E-03 curies of beta-gamma emitters was released as airborne particulate matter with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 1.24E-04 pCi/sec. Alpha emitting radionuclides were below detectable levels. Also,2.63E+0 curies of tritium were released with a maximum quarterly average release rate of 1.41E-01 pCi/sec.
1.2 Liquids Released to Illinois River A total of 1.243+07 liters of radioactive liquid wastes containing 2.75E-02 curies of fission and activation products (excluding tritium, noble gases and gross alpha) was discharged from the station. These wastes were released at a maximum quarterly average diluted concentration of 1.64E-08 pCi/ml from Units 2 and 3. During the same period,1.22E+01 curies of tritium were released with a maximum quarterly average release of 7.65E-06. Alpha emitting radionuclides were below detectable levels Quarterly release values are given in Table 1.2-1.
2.0 SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE Solid radioactive wastes were shipped to CNSI, Barnwell, South Carolina; AERC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; SEG, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Hake, Memphis Tennessee; Enviro- ,
Care, Clive, Utah; and Manufacturing Sciences Corporation, Tennessee. The record of '
waste shipments is summarized in Table 2.0-1.
3.0 DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways Table 3.1-1 summarizes the doses resulting from releases of airborne radioactivity via the different exposure pathways.
3.1.1 Noble Gases 3.1.1.1 Gamma Dose Rates Offsite gamma air and total body doses are shown in Table 3.1-1 av.J were calculated based on measured release rates, isotopic composition of the noble gases, and average meteorological data for the period.
Isodose contours based on concurrent meteorological data for gamma dose are shown in Figure 3.1-1. Based on measured effluents and meteorological data, the maximum dose to an adult would be 1.45E-03 6
. e mrem for the year, with an occupancy or shielding factor of 0.7 included,- and based on measured effluents and concurrent meterological data would be 2.07E-03 mrem. The maximum gamma air dose was 9.11E-04 mrad and 1.50E-03 mrad based on concurrent meterological data.
3.1.1.2 Beta Air and Skin Dose Rates The range of beta particles in air is relatively small (on the order of a )
few meters or less); consequently, plumes of gaseous effluents may be j considered " infinite" for the purpose of calculating the dose from beta j radiation incident on the skin. However, the actual dose to sensitive I skin tissues is difficult to calculate due to the effect of the beta particle i energies, thickness of inert skin, and clothing covering sensitive tissues.
For pu oses of this report the skin is taken to have a thickness of 7.0 mg/cm and an occupancy factor of 1.0 is used. The skin dose from beta and gamma radiation for the year was 7.95E-04 mrem (Table 3.1-1).
The air concentrations of radioactive noble gases at the offsite receptor locations are given in Figure 31-2. The maximum offsite beta air dose for the year was 1.05E-04 mrad.
3.1.2 Radioactive Indine The human thyroid exhibits a significant capacity to concentrate ingested or inhaled iodine. The radiciodine,I-131, released during routine operation of the station, may be made available to man resulting in a dose to the thyroid. The princi aal pathway of interest for this radionuclide is ingestion of radiciodine in milk by an infant. Calculations made in previous years indicate that contributions to doses from inhalation of I-131 and I-133 and from ingestion of I
, I-131 in milk are negligible. l I
3.1.2.1 ladine Concentrations in Air l
The calculated concentration contours for iodine in air are shown in I
' Figure 3.1-3. These calculations include an iodine cloud depletion j factor which accounts for the phenomenon of elemental iodine L deposition on the ground. The maximum iodine offsite average concentration is estimated to be 1.06E-04 pCi/m3 for the year.
3.1.2.2 Dose to Infant's Thyroid The hypothetical thyroid dose to an infant livir g near the station via j ingestion of milk was calculated. The radionucide considered was l- 1 131 and the source of milk was taken to be the neaast dairy farm with l the cows pastur4 from May through October. The maximum infant's ;
1 thyroid dose was less than 5.57E-03 mrem during the par (Table 3.1-1).
3.1.3 Concentrations of Particulates in Air Concentration contours of radioactive airborne particulates ar- shown in Figure 3.1-4 The maximum offsite average level is estimated to tw
' 4.32E-05 pCi/m3, 7
3.2 Liquid Effluent Pathways The three principal pathways through the aquatic environment for potential doses to man from liquid waste are ingestion of potable water, eating aquatic foods, and exposure while walking on the shoreline. Not all of these pathways are applicable at a given time or station but a reasonable approximation of the dose can be made by adjusting the dose formula for season of the year or type and degree of use of th'e aquatic environment. NRC-developed ec uations* were used to calculate the doses to the whole body, lower Cl tracts, thyroid, aone, skin; specific parameters for use in the ec uations are given in the Comed Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. The maximum w aole body dose for the year was 9.76E-04 mrem and the organ dose was 1.47E-03 mrem (Table 3.2-1).
3.3 Assessment of Dose to Member of Public l l
During the period January to December,1996, Dresden Station did not exceed these l limits as shown in Table 3.1-1 and Table 3.2-1 ( based on yearly average meterological l data) and as shown in Figure 3.1 1 ( based on concurrent meterological data):
- The RETS limits on dose or dose commitment to a member of the public due to radioactive materials in liquid effluents from each reactor unit (3 mrem to the whole body or 10 mrem to any organ during any calendar quarter; 6 mrem to the whole body or 20 mrem to any organ during any calendar year). j
- The RETS limits on air dose in noble gases released in gaseous effluents I to a member of the public from each reactor unit (5 mrad for gamma (
radiation or 10 mrad for beta radiation during any calendar quarter; 10 mrad for gamma radiation or 20 mrad for beta radiation during any calendar year).
- The RETS limits on dose to a member of the public due to lodine-131, l lodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released from each reactor unit (7.5 mrem to any organ during any calendar quarter; 15 mrem to any organ during any calendar year).
- The 10CFR20 limit on Total Effective Dose Equivalent to individual members of the public (100 mrem)(Table 3.3-1).
4.0 SITE METEOROLOGY A summary of the site meteorological measurements taken during each calendar quarter of the year is given in Appendix II. The data are presented as cumulative joint frequency distributions of the wind direction for the 300' level and wind speed class by atmospheric stability class determined from the temperature difference between the 300' and 35' levels.
Data recovery for all measurements on the tower was 99.6% during 1996.
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Rev.1).
8
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Table 5.0-1 and Table 5.0 2 provide an outline of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) as required in current Technical Specifications. Tables 5.0-3 to 5.0-6 summarize data for the year.
Except for tables of special interest, tabulated results of these analyses are no longer included in the annual report. All data tables are available for inspection at the St tion or in the Corporate Office.
Specific findings for various environmental media are discussed below.
5.1 Gamma Radiation External radiation dose from onsite sources and noble gases released to the atmosphere was measured using CaSO4:Tm thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).
TLD results are listed in Table 5.1-1 and locations are shown in Figures 5.0-1 and 5.0-2.
Quarterly external radiation dose at seventeen air sampling locations averaged 13.0 mR and was similar to that measured in 1985 (13.5 mR),1986 (14.4 mR),1987 (15.8 mR),1988 (14.9 mR),1989 (15.7 mR),1990 (14.9 mR),1991 (14.0 mR),1992 (15.6 mR),
1993 (15.5 mR),1994 (14.7 mR) and 1995 (14.1). The differences are not statistically significant.
5.2 Airborne I-131 and Particulate Radioactivity Locations of the samplers are shown in Figure 5.0-3. Airborne I-131 remained below the LLD of 0.10 pCi/m 3throughout the year in all analyzed samples.
Gross beta concentrations ranged from 0.4E-02 to 6.1E-02 pCi/m3 and averaged 2.2 E-02 pCi/m 3, and were similar to those in 1983 (2.0E-02 pCi/m 3),1984 (2.0E-02 3
pCi/.n ),1985 3 (2.0E-02 pCi/m ),1986 (2.5 E-02 pCi/m 3), except for the period from May 17 through June 7 when it was influenced by the nuclear reactor accident at Chernobyl), 1987 (2.4E-02 pCi/m3 ),1988 (2.7 E-02 pCi/m3 ),1989 (2.4 E-02 pCi/m3),
3 1990 (2.0 E-02 pCi/m3 ),1991 (2.0E-02 pCi/m 3),1992 (2.2E-02 Ci/m ),1993 (2.1 E-02 pCi/m 3),1994 (2.0 E-02 pCi/m 3) and 1995 (2.2E-02 pCi/m ). Quarterly gamma isotopic results were below the LLD level of 0.01 pCi/m3.
No radioactivity attributable to station operation was detected in any sample.
5.3 Aouatic Radioactivity Near station water locations and more distant water locations are shown in Figures 5.0-4 and 5.0-5, respectively.
Cooling water samples were collected daily and composited weekly for gross beta analysis from the Units 1 and 2/3 Inlet Canals and Units 1 and 2/3 Discharge Canals.
The yearly gross beta concentration averages for the inlet Canal and the Discharge !
Canals for 1996 were 3.7 pCi/L and 3.8 pCi/L, respectively. During the 14 year 9
i
a ,
t sampling period (1983-1996) the concentration averages ranged from 3.1 pCi/L in the Unit 1 Inlet Canal (1992), to an average 6.2 pCi/L in the Units 2/3 Discharge Canals (1985). The overall concentration averages for the 14 years were 4.2 pCi/L for both.
Surface water samples collected weekly from the Illinois River at the EJ&E RR Bridge and Illinois River Upstream of Morris Water Works were composited monthly and analyzed for gamma emitters. Cs-134 and Cs-137 levels were below the detection limit of 10 pCi/L and all other gamma emitters were below the detection limit of 20 pCi/L in all samples collected during the year. ,
Similar results were obtained in 1983 through 1995.
Well water samples were collected quarterly beginning October 1980 and analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium. The levels of activity detected were generally in the range to be expected in this medium in the environment and were not attributable to station operation.
Levels of gamma radioactivity in fish samples were measured and found in all cases to be below the lower limits of detection of 0.1 pCi/g wet weight for Cs-134 and Cs-137 and less than C 2 pCi/g wet weight for other gammas. The results were similar to those obtained in 1983 through 1995.
Two sediment samples were analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. The level of Cs-134 and Cs-137 was below the LLD level of 0.2 pCi/g dry weight. Other gamma emitters were below the LLD level of 0.2 pCi/g dry weight.
5.4 Milk Milk sample locations are shown in Figure 5.0-5. Milk samples were collected weekly during the grazing season (May through October) and monthly during the balance of the year from two required farms: Vince Biros Farm (control location), located about 11.5 miles south southwest; and Halpin's Dairy (control location), located about 16.0 miles south.1-131 was determined for each sample by chemical separation of I-131 and beta counting.
I 1131 remained below the detection limits of 5.0 pCi/L during the non-grazing period (November through April) and 0.5 pCi/L during the grazing period (May through ;
October). The results were similar to those obtained during the 1983 - 1995 period l except for samples collected during the second and third quarters of 1986. 1-131 J detected in milk samples during this period is attributable to the nuclear accident at !
5.5 SpecialCollections Service water contaminated by leaks in the LPCI heat exchanger was released into the cooling lake early in 1978. To monitor effects on the concentration of radioactivity in the cooling canal, a program of collecting weekly grab samples of water at the Dresden Road and County Line Road crossings of the canal began in October 1978.
Concentrations of both gross beta and gamma activities have not indicated the presence of detectable concentrations of radioactivity due to the station. Data tables are available for inspection at the Station or in the Corporate Office.
In June,1994, elevated tritium levels were discovered in the onsite storm sewers. A special program was initiated to identify, locate, and correct the source or sources of l l
1 10
~ .. .
. . -- -- . -. ~. -. - . - _ _ . _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _. . _ . _
]
, , I
'I radioactivity. Numerous wells have been drilled, and sampling and analysis from those wells and the storm sewers continues. Results of the 1996 sampling program l are available for inspection at the Station. Separate reports on the Dresden special sampling program are prepared by Comed and distributed to the NRC and Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety.
5.6 Listing of Missed Samoles !
All samples were collected as scheduled except for those listed in Listing of Missed !
Samples, Appendix III. 'l 5.7 Program Modifications In March of 1996, D-42 (Goodwin Dairy) went out of business. This dairy :
represented an extrr. sampling location; replacement was not necessary to meet l program requirements. ;
In June of 1996 during a review of REMP sampling requirements, a discrepancy was l identified. For Plant Cooling Water exposure pathway sampling, the " Minimum !
Number of Samples and Sample Locatioas" requirements listed " Intake, Discharge "
At that time, the U1 and U2/3 discharge canals and the U1 intake canal were sample locations. Up until that point it was believed that the Unit 1 intake sample met the ,
requirement 6r the " Intake" exposure pathway sample. Due to retirement of systenis which used to draw from the intake canal (e.g., service water, circulating water, etc.)
the canal is now essentially a dead leg (though there are a few systems which still ;
draw occasionally from the intake canal) and is not necessarily representative of the river water coming into the plant.
To prevent recurrence, REMP sampling requirements for all of the other sample l groups were reviewed and no other deficiencies were found. A sample location for i the U2/3 intake canal was established and sample collection was initiated. Chapter i 11 of the ODCM was revised to include this new sample location.
In reviewing the 1995 Annual Re nort it was discovered that page 98, Appendix V, ,
was incorrect. A report sage usec prior to 1992 was inadvertently placed in the 1995 :
report. The 1995 annua. reports for all other stations were then checked; this page l was used only in the report for Dresden Station.
6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Procedures used during the peroid covered in this report remained essentially unchanged.
A summary of the procedures used for analyzing radioactivity in environmental samples is given in Appendix VI of the report for the period January - December 1993 7.0 MILCH ANIMALS AND NEAREST CATTLE CENSUS Census of milch animals and nearest cattle were conducted within a five mile radius of the station. The survey was conducted by " door-to-door" canvas by A. Lewis on August 20 and 22,1996. Results of the milch animal and nearest cattle census are presented in Appendix IV.
There are no dairy farms within a five mile radius of the Dresden Nuclear Power Station.
11 I
. i l
l 8.0 NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUS The nearest resident census was conducted on August 20,1996. Results of the nearest l resident census are presented in Appendix IV.
9.0 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS Teledyne's Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results are presented in Appendix V.
i i
i I
l l
12
i,
.l1 i
s !
i j i i
i
.1- :
i 3
I i
s
- r. . i r
)
i i
APPENDIX I f 1
I i a
DATA TABLES AND FIGURES
)
i a
I 1
b a
t I
s i I i
)
1 U
9 i
4 4
]
1 f
I- 1
TABl> 1.1-1 DRESDEN NUCLEAR LOWER STATION UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT Januarv Through June 1996 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS Docket Numbers: 50-10/50-237/50-249 SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES EST. TOTAL TYPE OF RELEASE UNITS 131 2nd EPROR, %
OUARTER QL2?CIE A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES
- 1. Total Release ci j 1.30E+01 4.64E+01 7.31+00
- 2. Average Release Rate for Period pCi/sec 1.65E+00 5.90E+00 Percent of Technical Specification * *
- 3. %
Limit B. IODINES
- 1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 5.64E-04 4.18E-04 2.16E401
- 2. Average Release Rate of I-131 for pCi/sec 7.17E-05 5.31E-05 Period
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification %
Limit
- 4. Total Iodine-131, Iodine-133, and C1 3.81E-03 3.88E-03 Iodine-135 C. PARTICULATES
- 1. Particulates with half-lives > Ci 7.77E-04 9,75E-04 3.41E+01 ,
8 days !
i
- 2. Average Felease Rate for Period pC1/sec 9.88E-05 1.24E-04
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification %
Limit I
- 4. Gross Alpha Radioactivity Ci <LLD <LLD i
l D. TRITIUM i
- 1. Total Release Ci 1.11E+00 6.02E-01 7.89E+00
- 2. Average Release Rate for Period pCi/sec 1.41E-01 7.65E-02 l
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification %
- Limit
- The information is contained in the Radiological Impact on Man section of the report.
Total airborne release data is provided which includes fission and activaticn gases, lodines, particulates, and tritium.
l l
4 I
l- 2
. TABLE 1.1-1 (continued)
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT Julv Through December 1996 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS Docket Numbers: 50-10/50-237/50-249 SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES EST. TOTAL TYPE OF RELEASE UNITS hj ith ERRCR, %
OUARTER OUARTER A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES 1, Total Release Ci 5.50E-01 5.89E+00 7.31E+00
- 2. Average Release Rate for Period pCi/sec 7.00E-02 7.41E-01
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification %
Limit B. IODINES
- 1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 2.94E-05 2.87E-04 2.16E+01
- 2. Average Release Rate of I-131 for pCi/sec 3.74E-06 3.61E-05 Period
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification %
Limit
~
- 4. Total Iodine-131, Iodine-133, and Ci 3.88E-03 2.98E-03 Iodine-135 C. PARTICULATES
- 1. Particulates with half-lives > B C1 2.74E-04 1.21E-04 3.41E+01 days 2, Average Release Rate for Period pCi/sec 3.48E-05 1.52E-05
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification %
Limit
- 4. Gross Alpha Radioactivity Ci <LLD <LLD D. TRITItN
- 1. Total Release C1 1.88E-01 7.32E-01 7.89E+0D
- 2. Average Release Rate for Period pCi/see 2.38E-Of 9.21E-02
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification %
Limit
- The information is contained in the Radiological Impact on Man section of the report.
Total airborne release data is provided which includes fission and activation gases, iodines, particulates, and tritium.
I- 3
l TABLE 1.2-1 DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT January Through June 1925 LIQUID EFFLUENTS SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Docket Numbers: 50-10/50-237/50-249 ,
EST. TOTAL UNITS 131 2nd ERROR, %
OUARTER OUARTER A. FISSION AfD ACTIVATION PRODUC"TS
- 1. Total Release (not includir.g tritium. Ci 6.84E-03 7.90E-03 1.06E+01 gases. alpha)
- 2. Average Diluted Conc. During pCi/ml 1.07E-08 1.08E-08 Period 3, Percent of Applicable Limit %
B. TRITIUM
- 1. Total Release C1 2.70E+00 4.05E+00 1.14E+01
- 2. Average Diluted Conc. During pCi/ml 4.23E-06 5.54E-06 !
Period )
- 3. Percent of Applicable Limit t C. DISSOLVED Atc DJTRAINED GASES
- 1. Total Release Ci 8.05E-05 7.26E-05 5.58E+00
- 2. Average Diluted Conc. During pCi/ml 1.26E-10 9.94E-11 l Period i
- 3. Percent of Applicable Limit %
D. GROSS ALPHA RADICACTIVITY
- 1. Total Release l Ci l <LLD l <LLD l 1.51E+01 E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED (prior to Liters 2.96E+06 3.77E+06 5.00E+00 dilution)
F. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING Liters 6.36E+08 7.27E+0B 5.00E+00 PERIOD
- The information is contained in the Radiological Irnpact on Man section of this report.
Total liquid release data is provided which includes fission and activation produ:;ts, tritium, and dissolved and er. trained gases.
I I- 4 l
I TABLE : 2-1 (Continued)
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT Julv Through _ D_ecember 1915 LIQUID EFFLUENTS S
SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Docket Numbers: 50-10/50-237/50-249 EST. TOTAL UNITS 2Id M.b ERROR. %
OUARTER OUARTER A. FISSION MJD ACTIVATION PRODUCTS
- 1. Total Release (not including Ci 7.28E-03 5.50E-03 1.06E+01 I tritium, gases, alpha)
- 2. Average Diluted Conc. During pCi/ml 1.59E-09 1.64E-08 Period
- 3. Percent of Applicable Limit %
B. TRITIUM j
- 1. Total Release Ci 2.84E+00 2.57E+00 1.14E+01
- 2. Average Diluted Conc. During pCi/ml 6.20E-07 7.65E-06 Period
- 3. Percent of Applicable Limit %
C. DISSOLVED AND INTRAINED GASES
- 1. Total Release Ci <LLD <LLD 5.58E+00
- 2. Average Diluted Cone. During pCi/ml <LLD <LLD Period
- 3. Percent of Applicable Limit %
D. GROSS ALPHA RADICACTIVITY
- 1. Total Release l Ci l <LLD l <LLD l 1.51E+ 01 E. VOLUME OF KASTE Rb..'.7_Lv waior to Liters 3.94E+06 2.23E+06 5.00E+00 dilution)
F. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING Liters 4.5BE+09 3.36E+0B 5.00E+00 PERIOD
- The information is contained in the Radiological Impact on Man oc~ ion of this report.
Total liquid release data is provided which includes fission and activation products.
tritium, and dissolved and entrained gases.
I- 5
TABLE 2.0-1
-DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT January Through June 1996 !
Docket Numbers: 50-10/50-237/50-249 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS A. SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (NOT IRRADIATED FUEL) Est. Tctal Error, %
- 1. Type of Waste Unit 6-month period
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator ,3 6.64E+01 1.24E+01 bottoms, etc.
Ci 2.19E+02
- b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated ,3 9.91E+02 1.66E+01 equipment, etc.
Ci 1.80E-01
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. 3 3 1.64E+00 2.00E+01 l Ci 2.14E+02 l 1
- d. Other (describe) ,3 None l
Ci None l
- 2. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition (by type of waste) 3, Solid Waste Disposition 10MBER OF CHIPMEfRS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTIMATION 22 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) CNSI, Barnwell, SC M tor Freignt (exclusive use only) AERC, Oak Ridge, TN I 10 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) I Hake, Memphis, TN j Motor Freight (exclusive use only) 2 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) Manufacturing Sciences Corp,TN l 1 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) SEG, Oak Ridge, TN B. IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMEffrS (Disposition)
IUMBER OF CHIPMEPTPS MODE OF TPANSPORTATION DESTI!:ATICN None I- 6 )
i I
l J
4 4
TABLE 2.0-1 (continued)
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT Julv Through D.c mber 1996 Docket Numbers: 50-10/50-237/50-249 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS A. SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (NOT II' RADIATED FUEL) Est. Total Error, 4
- 1. Type of waste Unit e-month period
- a. Spent resins, falter sludges, evaporator 4 4.SIE*01 1.24E+01 g
bottoms, etc.
C1 4 3JE+U2
- b. Dry c ornp r e s s i ble waste, contaminated J 9.91E+02 1. ts t h+ 01 equipment, etc.
C1 1.BOE-01
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. ,J None C1 None
- d. Others Soll g 6.54E+03 2.00E+01 C1 8.04E-01
- 2. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition (by type C1 waste)
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc.
Percent t curies Co-60 5.80E+01 1.30E+02 Fe-55 P.66E+00 1.94E+01 Mn 54 1.17E+01 2.63E+01 Cs-137 1.92E+01 4.31E+01
- b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.
Co-60 2.42E+01 7.54E-01 Fe-55 5.47E+01 1.70E+00 Mn-54 1.27E*01 3.95E-01 Ni-63 1.40E+00 6.73E-01
- c. Other Soil Fe-55 8.37E+01 6.73E-01 H-3 5.8BE+00 4.73E-02 Pu-241 4.19E+00 3.37E-01 C-14 2.09E+00 2.6CE-01 Ni-63 1.71E+00 2.13E-01 Co-60 1.46E+00 1.18E-02
- 3. Solad Weste Dasposition m*MPtp CF fM f PMDFR WWF FF ?P.AHnPSRTATION f f ? **a?1CN 27 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) CNSI, Barnwell, SC 8 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) AERC, Oak Pidge, TN 8 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) Hake, Memphis, TN 1 Motor Freight (exclusive use only) SEG, Oak Ridge. TN 256 Rail Shipment Envirocare, Clive, UT D, IRfAriATED FVEL $NIPMENTS (Dispositioni m Matt CF tHtPMENT3 M9f't OF ?tANtP9P?ATIN rr??!ta*YTM
$$one I- 7
- - . - . - . ~ . - - . -, -.- .. . . - - -- .~... - - . .
. 'i i
l
! l i
> i TABLE 2.1-1 a
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION ,
UNITS 1, 2 AND-3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT.~ !
January Through ' June 1996 i ABNORMAL RELEASES
- r A. . LIQUID
- 1. Number of Releases 3- l
- 2. Total Activity Releases: 3.56E+01 ca i TME 3 l S. CASEOUS ,
. 1. Number of Releases: 4 ,
6 2.
Total Activity Releases: 5.78E-04 ca TOTAL 4- -
,' A.1 In June, 1994, elevated tritium levels were discovered in the on-site storm sewers.'The highest storm drain concentration, 9.04+02 pC1/1, from the 4th quarter was used for the first. half of 1996. The total activity released is based on an estimated typical discharge flow of 10 gallons per minute. No other isotopes were found in the samples.
Various storm sewer locations on-site are now periodically analyzed for tritium. .The total release for the 1st and 2nd quarter of the year is 1.49E-04 pCi. !
l
. A.2 The May 1996 U3 Service Water grab sample had a concentration of 3.51E-07 pCi/1 for Fe-55. 'i
+ In order to calculate the total activity released for the month, it is assumed that the concentra, tion existed for the entire month and the Service Water had a flow of 60,000gpm, Dased on the two aforementioned assumptions, the total activity released would be 3.56 Ci ,
of Fe-55. j i
A,3 During D2R14, samples of debris from the U2 main condenser tube-cleaning evolution were found to be isotopically contaminated. The highest results from the isotopics were:
Mn-54 7.40E-02 pci/g wet Co-60 1.77E+00 pC1/g wet Cs-137 3.01E-01 pei/g wet t
]
It was estimated th - approximately 7,000 to 10,000 pounds of debris were in the U2 rnain condenser. When circulating was first utilized following the cleaning, it is assurned that all of the debris was removed from the condenser in the circulating water. An estimate of the activity released through the circulating water is:
Mn-54 3.36E-01 pCi Co-60 8.05E+00 pCi Cs-137 1.37E* 00 pC1 TOTAL 9.76E+00 pCi
- These releases are not included in the Liquid Effluents Summation of all Releases Tables I- 8
TABLE 2.1-1 (Continued)
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT Januarv Through June 1996 ABNORMAL RELEASES
- B.1 on 15 May 1996 the U3 isolation condenser was utilized. Due to residual amounts of anthropogenic radioactivity present in the system, an estimated 447 pCi of Co-60 was released into the environment.
B.2 During the demolition of tanks in the U1 Radwaste yard in the second quarter of 1996 an estimated 3.61E+00 pCi of Cs-137 and 6.78E-01 pCi of Co-60 was released into the atmosphere.
B.3 The East Turbine Building Ventilation System was found to have a contaminated fan blade.
This system is designed to pull air in from outdoors and ventilate non-Badiologically Posted Areas and then exhaust the air back into the environment. It is unknown when the fan blade became contaminated. Smears of the ductwork indicate the presence of co-60 and Cs-137. An estimated 2.5E+00 pCi of Co-60 and Cs-137 may have been exhausted into the environment.
B.4 The heating steam system has low level contamination present. During operation of the system, some steam is vented directly into the environment. Based on a steam concentration of 2.20E-08 pCi/gm, there would have been an estimated release of 1.25E-04 Ci of anthropogenic radionuclides (mainly Co-60 and Cs-137) into the environment for the first half of 1996.
' These releases are not included in the Effluents Summation of all Peleases Tables.
I- 9
.+ .
TABLE 2.1-1 (continued)
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT Julv Through December 1996 ABNORMAL RELEASES
- A. L10UID
- 1. Number of Releases: 6
- 2. Total Activity Releases: 1.2tE+02 C1 TOTAL 6 B. GASEC'JS
- 1. Number of Releases: 2
- 2. Total Activity Releases 3.21E-05 Ci TOTA 1. 2 A.1 In June, 1994, elevated tritium levels were discovered in the on-site storm sewers. The highest storm drain concentration, 9.04E+02 pCi/1, was used for both the third and fourth quarters of 1996 (no data from the 3rd quarter). The total activity released is based on an estimated typleal discharge flow of 10 gallons per minute and the highest tritium level for the fourth quarter. No other isotopes were found in the samples. Various storm sewer locations on-site are now periodically analyzed for tritium. The total release for the ,
3rd and 4th quarter of the year is 1.51E-04 C1. ,
i A.2 The July 1996 U2 Service Water grab sample had a oncentration of 1.56E-07 pel/ml for i Fe-55. In order to calculate the total activity released for the month, it is assumed I that the concentration existed for the entire month and the Service Water had a flow of i 60,000 gpm. Based on the two aforementioned assumptions, the total activity released would be 1.60E+00 Ci of Fe-55. !
i A3 The October 1996 U2 Service Water grab sample had a concentration of 9.01E-07 pCi/ml for Fe-55 and 6.63E-07 pCi/ml for H-3. In order to calculate the total activity released for l the month, it is assumed that the concentration existed for the enttre month and the )
Service Water had a flow of 60,000 gpm. Based on the two aforementioned assumptions. the j total activity released would be 9.13E+00 Ci of Fe-55 and 6,72EiOO Ci of H-3. ;
i A.4 The October 1996 U3 Service Water grab sample had a concentration of 2.19E-06 pC1/mi for .
Fe-55 and 8.65E-07 pCi/ml for H-3. In order to calculate the total activity released for [
the month, it is assumed that the concentration existed for the entire month and the !
Service Water had a flow of 60,000 gpm. Based on the two af orement ioned assun.ptions, the !
total activity released would te 2.22E+00 Ci of Fe-55 and 8.97E+00 Ci of H-3. l A4 The November 1996 U2 Service Water grab sample had a concentration of 1.42E-06 pCi/ml for H-3. In order to calculate the total activity released for the month, it is assumed that ;
the concentration existed for the entire month and the Service water had a flow of 60,000 )
gpm. Based on the two aforementioned assumptions, the total activity released would be
- 1.39E+01 Ci of H-3.
A.6 The November 1996 U3 Service Water grab sample had a concentration of 6.90E-C6 pCi/ml for Fe-55 and 1. 48E-06 pci/ml f or H-3. In order to calculate the total activity released for the month, it is assumed that the concentration existed for the entire month and the Service Water had a flow of 60,000 gpm. Based on the two aforementioned assumptions, the total activity released would be 6.77E+01 C1 of Fe-55 and 1.45E+01 Ci of H-3, p.1 The East Turbine Building Ventilation System was found to have a contaminated fan blade.
This system is designed to pull air in from outdoors and ventilate non Radiologically Posted Areas and then exhaust the air back into the environment. It is unknown when the l fan blade became contaminated. Smears of the ductwork indicate the presence of Co-60 and I Cs-137. An estimated 2.5E+00 pCi of Co-60 and Cs-137 may have been exhausted into the l environment, i l
+ These release are not $ncluded in the Ef fluents Summation of all Peleases Tabica.
I- 10
. j 4
t
(-
I f
i 3
f 5 '
TABLE 2.1-1 (continued)
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT Julv Through December 1996 ABNORMAL RELEASES
- i t
B.2 The beating system has low level contamination present, hring operation of the system, some steam is vented directly into the environment, Based on a steam concentration of 2,20E-08 pCi/gm there would have been an estimated release of 2.96E-05 Ci of anthropogenic >
radionuclides (mainly co-60 and Cs-137) into the environment for the second half of 1996. ,
i 1
I 1
l l
l
)
I 1
i J
i l
i
- These releases are not included in the Effluents Summation of all Feleases Tables.
1 I
l- 11 l
1
C /
-S l
~y / 1 FIGURE 3.1-1 , ,
! ' '00 "O8i [fi Estimated Cumulative Gamma Dose (in mrem) '
from the Dresden Station for the period January-December 1996 6
)
- Isoofeth labels ,50 / ,
, p ,
Small figure - multiply by 10 s e a'
Large figure - multiply by 10 8 25 g- %<
'1 q
SCALE
- u- '
c .,as M.
@ Y revdle e % -
uw 25 vrsint,eio
- . N
- 1,0Ckpor t g+
K
...e, N D A L L f< g'gce w, us .
4/
/
v . ,2 (neryseed
- , - a kk ,. ,0 .
'N l New g O g,seen I s'
O 6 co =. .
/ ,, ,
W 0* l L
{ .. Che j ,
g i,,,4 . Monhof f on l .0 15 0 ' , SITE ' 250 h
- M. / =i- _au_
~
s l, Q ~
%I 50 ,,,,,
Ser 0 C.ty u ,,,, ,r e~
e 25 %
G R _v N v y e ,
9, ##
sea.
.e
/ .o e .
Gore
( sees s-#* . T,X'ob. K A N er
'i t a SCALE O 9 10 i$ f_0 Mit t s 30 s u
- 0. S. 60 it to 29 1 12
a O
a 250 :
- i FIGURE 3.1-2 9- '"It '
l
. Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3) of Noble Gas'er from the Dresden Station
'Q
'500 for the period January-December 1996 hooleth Labels g1 Small figure multiply by 10 4 j Large figure multiply by 10 4
/
250 -
p
< / J SCALE b-f I l , *, mit t s
- e % NW y dyille Vl0*Rf etl0 1 (
l u a
f 1
& 5 n l h o Lockport
._ .,e -
L j'.
- E N O A '
us a
. e'o st > ' > '
_. ~
)
r l 50 y
, x [***' NE
'y 6 _
e k <r e t I
,f o,,]
g ) l
- e '
/ . .
f at.noen
, g 3
- s l e *
.. /.,.'*** ,
cm e
f
- W ~j W I L L
- / t,
~~.-.
l I
s) .s k 2,0
~
l
' ,e as.. -
un,,, 250 vs st i
+
10 0
}
' t am ~ m ;
I
'Op g ,
. ...s... ,
f..,_ x p .. _ . . 2, s
. G0rdntf
/ 3 sees South g -#,. wiimingtoni K A N /
+
4 IL L I?
SCALC is to mitts o s 9 to 29 3,0 a u L..9 IS to se.
~=- I-13 l
l
._ l
FIGURE 3.1-3
~
y pgg i Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3) IN of lodines frdm the Dresden Station for the period January-December 1996
%/ f. 4 6
1000 11ooleth Labels 500 * '. ,
Small figure multiply by 10 .
Large figure - multiply by 10-' .
4 SCALE
, h,
-! mitt s
~ ""
(f
~
oe %
< a ville $0 k kl$
Q'A s . .
K E N D A L L :-
A , \
us..
s' ,,,oe y sg ' ' 's '
l 10 0 Lenos A'*
I * +
" L esson ,,,, p. o , ,,
o i ,
O W l L L
..e
/
$*f Seneco su ses city / ! /
u*)g , q_
. w.imi ton ~
5 ""
~~
)
ci -@A 88"' d Mo; [ - ,,
G R N D - i g< ,
Y. .' ...~ : y f ,,,,
Gordner'
%* - south e ,- 6 A N Y
/s' --
. tot I?
SCALE o s to is eo mitts is ts so e s 0....s so r.o
/
- j I-14 1
o FIGURE 3.1-4 g g '
? ' \j g!
Estimated Total Concentrations (in pCi/m3)
D , Ij@ .
- 'i s 5 of Particulatds from the Dresden Station a 250 for the period January-December 1996 ( l6 y
tso %
- isooleth labels
- Small figure - multiply by 10-' .
Large figure - multiply by 10
w e SCALE l
- m-.= -. ' uitt s EM W Y rhyalle he % -
Ploi4 field , $
e 'e
- e y.h
,f . . ,
, ' .7%
Lockport
. 1 L'* .
- K E N D A L us e 4W wA i
t-- /
. v s st a % . e,o*'.
- g s \f_
s y, i.m
. g Lenos 'Y
~
og ,,, Q ,J)' o 't (
- t 7m.;*
3 q
/
a j i
'g ~
W l L L c,.
e i
,. s
' i Monhotton h
/ '
g i.... * ,
i..o ) /, ITE - I uorris 10( ,
qm l
3 % )=,;,,,,N c :g i- pM ;
, . W,im.
eu .i s cier ton Sineco f.f t-
,i*,, '
B'* ** *
- u. q, ,
rc '# ;
N D /,,,,, j Gardne/
, o t em
.P South e ,o wiimingtoni K A N (
iu i, SCALE 0, _ . .s no en t.o mists a t so es to tS So s u wu
/ .
l-15
~. . . -. _ - . .. -. .
t TABLE 3.1-1 DRESDEN STATION UNIT ONE .
ACTUAL 1996 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 02/20/97 INFANT RECEPTOR 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH ,
TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 (MRAD) ( ) (' ) ( ) ( ) ( )
BETA AIR 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 (MRAD) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
TOT. BODY 0.00E+00 0 00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 (MREM) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
SKIN 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 (MREM) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
ORGAN 7.03E-05 1.99E-05 2.78E-05 4.94E-05 1.67E-04 (MREM) (SSE ) (ESE ) (SSE ) (SSE ) (SSE )
LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I INFANT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I. ------------
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4Th QTR YRLY % OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.00 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 J.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 1-16
. . l
. 1 TABLE 3.1-1 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION UNIT ONE ACTUAL 1996 '
MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 02/20/97 ADULT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 (MRAD) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
BETA AIR 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 (MRAD) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
TOT. BODY 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 (MREM) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
SKIN 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 (MREM) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
ORGAN 6.77E-05 2.66E-05 4.02E-05 5.42E-05 1.88E-04 i
(MREM) (S } (SSE ) (SSE ) (SSE ) (SSE )
LIVER LIVER GI_LLI LIVER LIVER THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I
. ADULT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I. ------------
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I i
GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 .0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.00
- SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 E
LIVER LIVER GI_LLI LIVER LIVER RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 l ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 1
1 17
l TABLE 3.1-1 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION UNIT TWO j ACTUAL 1996 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES '
PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 02/20/97 INFANT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 0.00E+00 1.25E-07 2.19E-10 3.33E-06 3.45E-06 (MRAD) ( ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N )
BETA AIR 0.00E+00 2.35E-08 4.10E-11 1.84E-07 2.08E-07 (MRAD) ( ) (E ) (E ) (E ) (E )
TOT. BODY 0.00E+00 9.42E-08 1.65E-10 2.50E-06 2.60E-06 (MREM) ( ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N )
SKIN 0.00E+00 1.15E-07 2.00E-10 2.72E-06 2.83E-06 (MREM) ( ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N )
ORGAN 6.08E-04 3.33E-04 5.20E-04 4.43E-04 1.83E-03 I
(MREM) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N )
LUNG THYROID LUNG LIVER THYROID THYROID I KIDNEY l LUNG l GI_LLI j THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996
. 1 I
COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I INFANT RECEPTOR
t OF APP I. ------------
QTRLY IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF JUL-SEP OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.00 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 15.0 0.01 4
LUNG THYROID LUNC LIVER THYROID THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI._LLI RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 1-18 l
TABLE 3.1-1 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION UNIT TWO ACTUAL 1996 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 02/20/97 ADULT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC GAMMA AIR 0.00E+00 1.25E-07 2.19E-10 3.33E-06 3.45E-06 (MRAD) ( ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N )
BETA AIR 0.00E+00 2.35E-08 4.10E-11 1.84E-07 2.08E-07 (MRAD) ( ) (E ) (E ) (E ) (E )
TOT. BODY 0.00E+00 9.42E-08 1.65E-10 2.50E-06 2.60E-06 (MREM) ( ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N )
SKIN 0.00E+00 1.15E-07 2.00E-10 2.72E-06 2.83E-06 (MREM) ( ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N )
ORGAN 6.12E-04 3.56E-04 7.63E-04 1.80E-03 3.35E-03 (MREM) (N ) (N ) (N ) (NW ) (N )
LUNG GI_LLI GI_LLI LIVER GI_LLI THYROID KIDNEY e LUNG GI_LLI THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I ADULT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I. ------------
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.00 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.00 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 15.0 0.02 LUNG GI_LLI GI_LLI LIVER GI_,LLI THYRO *D KIDNEY LUNG GI_LLI RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I-19
- {
A TABLE 3.1-1 (continued) i DRESDEN STATION UNIT THREE ACTUAL 1996 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 02/20/97 INFANT RECEPTOR 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL :
JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC l GAMMA AIR 7.95E-05 7.94E-04 3.45E-06 3.46E-05 9.11E-04 (MRAD) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N ) 1 BETA AIR 1.49E-05 8.31E-05 6.44E-07 6.59E-06 1.5CE-04 (MRAD) (E ) (E ) (E ) (E ) (E ) l TOT. BODY 5.97E-05 1.41E-03 2.59E-06 2.60E-05 1 45E-03 l (MREM) (N ) (WNW ) (N ) (N ) (WN'il } }
SKIN 7.27E-05 6.85E-04 3.15E-06 3.16E-05 7.92E-04 !
(MREM) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N )
ORGAN 9.18E-04 1.37E-03 4.45E-04 1.01E-03 3.74E-03 i (MREM) (N ) (SSW ) (N ) (N ) (N )
I LUNG THYROID LUNG THYROID THYROID s
THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 a
COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I
- INFANT RECEPTOR ,
- ------------ % OF APP I. ------------
t i
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF ;
OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I ;
GANFR AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.01 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20. 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 5.C 0.03 l SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 15.C 0.01 ,
ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 15.C 0.02 !
LUNG THYROID LUNG THYROID THYROID i l
RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ;
ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 i ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I-20
a o i
1D4BLE 3.1-1 (continued) !
DRESDEN STATION UNIT THREE ACTUAL 1996 MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM AIRBORNE RELEASES PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 02/20/97 ADULT RECEPTOR ;
IST 2ND 3RD 4TH TYPE QUARTER OUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC ,
J O! '04 AIR 7.95E-05 7.94E-04 3.45E-06 3.46E-05 9.11E-04 l
(12AD) (N ) (N ) (N ) {N ) (N )
BETA AIR 1.49E-05 8.31E-05 6.44E-07 6.59E-06 1.05E-05 I J
(MRAD) 'E ) (E ) (E ) (E ) (E )
TOT. BODY 5.97E-05 1.40E-03 2.59E-06 2.60E-05 1.45E-03 (MREM) (N ) (WNW ) (N ) (N ) (WNW )
SKIN 7.27E-05 6.85E-04 3.15E-06 3.16E-05 7.92E-04 (MREM) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N )
ORGAN 9.29E-04 1.85E-03 E.27F-04 1.92E-03 4.54E-03 (MREM) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N ) (N )
LUNG GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 4
COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10CFR 50 APP. I ADULT RECEPTOR
% OF APP I. ------------
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I GAMMA AIR (MRAD) 5.0 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 10.0 0.01 BETA AIR (MRAD) 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 0.00 TOT. BODY (MREM) 2.5 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 5.0 0.03 SKIN (MREM) 7.5 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 15.0 0.01 ORGAN (MREM) 7.5 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 15.0 0.03 LUNG. GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI GI_LLI RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 !
ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 1
I-21 j i
I t
T/LBLE 3.2-1 k
DRESDEN STATION UNIT TWO ACTUAL 1996 ;
MAXIMUM DOSES (MREM) RESULTING FROM AQUATIC EFFLUENTS !
PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 02/20/97 i ADULT RECEPTOR IST 2ND 3RD 4TH DOSE TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL ;
JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP- OCT-DEC i TOTAL 7.39E-05 1.08E-04 1.88E-04 1.17E-04 4.87E-04 BODY INTERNAL 1.10E-04 .1.60E-04 2.85E-04 1.77E-04 7.32E-04 ORGAN LIVER LIVER i
THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 ,
COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 APP. I
% OF APP I. ------------
QTRLY 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF OBJ JAN-MIR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I TOTAL BODY (MREM) 1.5 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 3.0 0.02 CRIT. ORGAN (MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 10.0 0.01 LIVER LIVER RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 e
) '
i L
4 1-22
i TABLE 3.2-1 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION UNIT THREE
$ ACTUAL 1996 ;
MAXIMUM DOSES (MREM) RESULTING FROM AQUATIC EFFLUENTS PERIOD OF RELEASE - 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 02/20/97 ADULT RECEPTOR 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH DOSE TYPE QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ANNUAL
=
JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC TOTAL 7.39E-05 1.07E-04 1.91E-04 1.17E-04 4.89E-04 BODY INTERNAL 1.10E-04 1.59E-04 2.89E-04 1.77E-04 7.39E-04
- - ORGAN LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER :
l THIS IS A REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 i
i l
COMPLIANCE STATUS - 10 CFR 50 APP. I
% OF APP I. ------------
QTRLY 1ST OTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR YRLY % OF OBJ JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC OBJ APP. I TOTAL BODY (MREM) 1.5 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 3.0 0.02 1
CRIT. ORGAN (MREM) 5.0 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 10.0 0.01 LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER LIVER RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCV, SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995
)
i l
I-23
TABLS 3.3-1 DRESDEN STATION UNI"/ ONE 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 03/05/97
- 1. 10 CFR 20.1301 (a)(1) Compliance Total Effective Dose Equivalent, mrem /yr 1.82E-04 10 CFR 20.1301 (a)(1) limit mrem /yr 100.0
% of limit 0.00 Compliance Summary - 10CFR2C 1st 2nd 3rd 4th % of Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr Limit TEDE 6.93E-05 2.39E-05 3.60E-05 5.27E-05 0.00 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 Januer 1995 I 24
. . I
)
i i
TABLE 3.3-1 (continued)
I l
DRESDEN STATION UNIT ONE 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 03/05/97 i
- 2. 10 CFR 20.1301 (d)/40 CFR 190 Compliance :
1 Dose Limit % of i (mrem) (mr't) Limit l l
Whole Body Plume 0.00E+00 l (DDE) Skyshine 0.00E+00 ]
Ground 1.49E-04 Total 1.49E-04 25.0 0.00 Organ Dosa Thyroid 3.07E-05 75.0 0.00 (CDE) Gonads 3.25E-05 25.0 0.00 Breast 3.10E-05 25.0 0.00 Lung 3.16E-05 25.0 0.00 Marrow 3.13E-05 25.0 0.00 Bone 3.08E-05 25.0 0.00 Remainder 3.49E-05 25.0 0.00 CEDE 3.27E-05 TEDE 1.82E-04 100.0 0.00 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 I-25 ;
o .
?
TABL6 3.3-1 (continued) f DRESDEN STATION UNIT TWO 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 03/05/97
- 1. 10 CFR 20.1301 (a)(1) Compliance i
Total Effective Dose Equivalent, mrem /yr 1.18E+00 i 10 CFR 20.1301 (a) (1) limit mrem /yr 100.0
% of limit 1.18 Compliance Summary - 10CFR20 l ist 2nd 3rd 4th % of Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr Limit TEDE 6.72E-04 2.89E-02 2.49E-01 8.99E-01 1.18 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 f
I- 26 -
s' O 1
l i
TABLE 3.3-1 (continued) l DRESDEN STATION UNIT TWO 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT ,
1 PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 03/05/97 1
- 2. 10 CFR 20.1301 (d)/40 CFR 190 Compliance l Dose Limit % of (mrem) (mrem) Limit
'l 1
Whole Body Plume 2.60E-06 1 (DDE) Skyshine 1.17E+00 l Ground 1.67E-03 Total 1.18E+00 25.0 4.71 Organ Dose Thyroid 9.30E-04 75.0 0.00 (CDE) Gonads 9.32E-04 25.0 0.00 Breast 8.48E-04 25.0 0.00 Lung 9.01E-04 25.0 0.00 l Marrow 8.79E-04 25.0 0.00 Bone 8.54E-04 25.0 0.00 Remainder 1.52E-03 25.0 0.01 CEDE 1.08E-03 TEDE 1.18E+00 100.0 1.18 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 l l
i i
i 1-27 l I
l TABLE 3.3-1 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION UNIT THREE 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 CALCULATED 03/05/97
- 1. 10 CFR 20.1301 (a)(1) Compliance Total Effective Dose Equivalent, mrem /yr 3.5,E-01 l
10 CFR 20.1301 (a)(1) limit mrem /yr 100.0
% of limit 0.36 ,
I I
l l
Compliance Summary - 10CFR20 ist 2nd 3rd 4th % of Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr Limit
! TEDE 1.97E-01 1.02E-01 1.21E-02 4.68E-02 0.36 i RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ,
l ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 Jariuary 1995 l
I- 28
. . . ~ . _ . ..
a b
I i
TABLE 3.3-1 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION UNIT THREE 10 CFR 20 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT .
PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT 01/01/96 TO 12/31/96 !
9 CALCULATED 03/05/97 t
- 2. 10 CFR 20.1301 (d)/40 CFR 190 Compliance-Dose Limit % of i (mrem) (mrem) Limit Whole Body Plume 1.45E-03
, (DDE) Skyshine 3.52E-01 ,
Ground 2.48E-01 !
l Total 3.56E-01 25.0 1.42 l
Organ Dose Thyroid 2.58E-03 75.0 0.00 l I
(CDE) Gonads 1.42E-03 25.0 0.01 Breast 1.32E-03 25.0 0.01 Lung 1.38E-03 25.0 0.01 Marrow 1.35E-03 25.0 0.01 Bone 1.32E-03 25.0 0.01 Remainder 1.98E-03 25.0 0.01 CEDE 1.56E-03 TEDE 3.58E-01 100.0 0.36 RESULTS BASED UPON: ODCM ANNEX REVISION 1.1 JULY 1994 ] '
ODCM SOFTWARE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 ODCM DATABASE VERSION 1.1 January 1995 1
I-29 l
FIGURE 5.0-1 !
I I
}.
!: 1 i j l
I' CECoRow l
g5 I
% son.,102 2 116 1 116-2 101 1 m j 101- E , S l
C.,,,.i.,,
Road Towpath Road y l I03 N l e 1041 i b e 104 2
'. Dresden Island Lock and Osen f, gw' .
8 105 1 M. ,
DMa*
, j a 114111513
= 114 2 115-2 3 Dresden Nuclear 8 105 2 l
l 81131
- Power Station 51132 l' Y al5
@4 r
t111 1
g hN
- Em 111 2- 106 1 106 2 '
l a- son.i i
{@ "m** 0 g*ord _
top.
Yacht !
" Prel,te Cub
%, l d 3 m
i
'O State 110 3 e a 110 4 a
a
<g y ,
j e
iuw 108 1
. o tra
' ' 1082 =
8 3mm -
} ,
I I
< E TLD DRESDEN STATION i UNITS 1,2 & 3 ,
INNER RING TLD LOCATIONS i
- I- 30 i
s,
e v 4
FIGURE 5.0-2
, f 3 h
+
v c
[ Joliet 2161 216 2 as E 215-1 e -2 215-2031 N
- E 203-2
~ '
,e 21s-2 em
,i f',,a[i>> ! s, N l
- / ,,,== -
i oo.,
206 1 a
S212 38 **
SN 4 ._ L
- Morris Ifi.2
2ii.1 =K1 e
210-1 208. ' d
- 242 g lit.113 209 td 'g Coal City .
- n, o s 1,o w e io no oe.i.,
- Air sampung Location DRESDEN STATION UNITS 1,2 & 3 s TLD Location
- OUTER RING TLD LOCATIONS ,
I i
1- 31
.s
FIGURE 5.0-3 4
d 3
1 **+ ,
g
( ,
e se
-
- 15 12 i
18
//
/ :
>[
2 11 , 3. N
., l l 4..; .
8 d 11 me ._10 *7 g
- Morris g a tts .
9M
- Coal City +q
.s g% .
l
? __ ? '? "d"
- *** DRESDEN STATION
! , ? ,
UNITS 1,2 & 3 ,
a l
- Air Sampling locato" FIXED AIR SAMPLING AND TLD SITES D41 Onsite Stanon 1 D 11 Morns DJJ2 Onsite Stanon 2 D 12 Lisbon D43 Onsite Stahon 3 D-13 Minooka D-04 Collins Road D 14 Channahon D46 Will County Road D-15 Johet D47 Clay Products D 16 Elwood D-08 Praine Parks D-17 Wilmington D49 Coal City D-45 McKinley Woods Road D 10 Goose Lake Village e
~
I- 32 ,
i 1
r, , - ,- -
. /
e T
FIGURE 5.0-4 ,
i ia CECoRow b
Cemeterr
/ )
j Ro.d Towpath Ro.d -
N
.d.nigandt a h
, , p .ad o.m l 4 35 D 20*
d
- D.21 D.19
)
- ' DMa* Dresden Nuclear k '
l Power Station D-50 e D.18 e N
1:r j i .
N6MB 1 er i
l.>n D s-.,
9
- o 3 w~., d e .
) s - v-an y
' M General E3.ctr,c Ca. -
{'
3 O
o gj
- 1 8
'? 3*
8 "*"" -
? !
1
. DRESDEN STATION UNITS 1,2 & 3 NEAR STATION WATER SANIPLE LOCATIONS
. Water 4
D-18 Inlet Canal D 19 Dixharge Unit 1 D 20 Dixharge Unit 2/3 D 21111inois River at EJ&E RR Bridge D-23 Thorsen Well D-28 Dresden Pool at Ilhnois River D 35 Dresden Lock & Dam i
e I- 33 ,
/.
i
, FIGURE 5.0-5
- i Y
A u.s. s .
). .
(" ..h/
/~ $ /
v i.
,..s J f _D 34A y
d
' l ,
ed D.22 _ D-34 i
- Morris is.11s
= ,
325 Coal City *, :
l 9 l DS P-42 * % ~
l l
V e D-26 16 miles 5
~
e s io nm l
e to no % DRESDEN STATION
- UNITS 1,2 & 3 MILK SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND MORE E Mik DISTANT WATER SAMPLE LOCATIONS
]
9 Water D 22 Illinois River at Morris Water Works D-25 Vine Biros Farrn D-26 Halpin's Dairy i D-34A Coolin Lake - Dresden Road Crossing D-34 B Coolin Lake . County Line Crossing DSP 42 Good in Dairy o
e I- 34
9 TABLE 5.0-1 5m
?
Dresden Station e,c $ j j Radiological Environmental Monitoring j g } g 3 Locations g qc g j g g
-g u e
@ O 9 .c 3 :f @w E-
. - . a 6 .c ;;: T e
< H U w J- e 1, m O D-01 Onsite Station 1 0 0 .
D-02 Onsite Station 2 0 0 D-03 Onsite Station 3 0 0 D-04 Collins Road 0 0 . .
D-06 Will County Road 0 0 D-07 Clay Products 0 0 D-08 Prairie Parks 0 0 .
D 09 Coal City 0 0 D-10 Goose Lake Village 0 0 D-11 Morris 0 0 . .
D 12 ljsbon 0 0 .
D-13 Minooka 0 0 . .
D-14 Channahon 0 0 D-15 Joliet 0 0 D-16 Elwood 0 0 .
D-17 Wilmington 0 0 . ,
D-18 Inlet Canal . . 0 .
D-19 Discharge - Unit 1 . . O 0
D-20 Dischary,e - Unit 2/3 .
D-50 Inlet Unit 2/3 0 .
D-21 Illinois River at EJ&E RR Bridge . . O D-22 filinois River Upstream of Morris Water Works . . 0 .
D-23 Thorsen Well . . O D-25 Vince Biros Farm . O
. 0 .
D-26 Halpin's Lock D-27 Dresden Dairy & Dam . . O D-28 Dresden Pool at Illinois River 0 0 D-34 A Coolin Lake , Dresden Road Crossing 0 . ;
D-34B Coolin Lake , County Line Crossing 0 .
i D-35 Dresde xk & Dam . . . O I D-46 DesPlaines River, Upstream . . . O D-45 McKinley Woods Road 0 0 )
CENSUS Dairy Residence Cattie l
i i
1- 35 <
1
TABLE 5.0-2 DRESDEN STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS
- 1. AIR SAMPIIRS Distance Direction Site Code a Location (miles) (")
D-01 Onsite Station 1 0.6 309 D-02 Onsite Station 2 0.3 43 D-03 Onsite Station 3 0.4 175 D-04 Collins Road 0.9 260 D-06 Will County Road 1.4 132 D-07 Clay Products 2.0 180 D-08 Prairie Parks 4.0 230 CoalCity 7.5 190 D-09 (C)
D-10 Goose Lake Village 3.8 210 D-11 (C) Morris 8.0 250 D-12 (C) Lisbon 10.0 310 D-13 Minooka 4.5 5 D-14 Channahon 3.5 40 D-15 (C) Joliet 12.5 60 D-16 (C) Elwood 8.0 80 D-17 (C) Wilmington 8.0 130 D-45 McKinley Woods Road 1.5 70
- 2. TLDs
- a. Same as No.1.
- b. SpecialTLD Locations Distance Direction Site Code (miles) (0)
Inner Ring D-101 1,2 1.0 4 D-102-1,2 1.3 25 D-103-1,2 1.2 44 D-104-1,2 1.5 67 D-105-1,2 1.4 90 D-106-1,2 0.9 105 D-107-1,2 1.3 128 D-108-1,2 1.9 157 D-109-1,2 0.8 175 D-110-3,4 0.8 203 D-111-1,2 0.6 225 a Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other krations are indicators.
I- 36
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
DRESDEN STAT 10N RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS 2.TLDs
- b. Special TLD Locations (continued)
Distance Direction Site Code (miles) (0)
Inner Ring (continued)
D-112a-1,2 - 0.8 240 D-113-1,2 0.9 277 D-114-1,2 1.0 292 j D-115-1,2 0.8 309 !
D-116-1,2 1.0 341 Outer Ring D-201 1,2 4.5 0 D-202-1,2 c.0 20 D-203-1,2 4.5 42 D-204-1,2 5.0 65 D-205-1,2 4.2 90 D-206-1,2 3.5 118 D-207-1,2 4.5 135 D-208-1,2 5.0 156 D-209-1,2 5.0 180 D-210-1,2 4.8 200 D-211 1,2 5.0 225 D-212-3,4 6.0 239 D-213-1,2 4.5 260 D-214-1,2 4.5 290 D-215-1,2 5.1 310 D-216-1,2 4.8 340
- 3. M IL K Distance Direction Site Codea Location (miles) (")
D-25 (C) Vince Biros Farm 11.5 206 D-26 (C) Halpin's Dairy 16.0 175 DSP-42 (C)b Goodwin Dairy 12.8 135 a Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other locations are indicators.
b Goodwin Dairy went out of business in March of 1996.
I-37
I e
l TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION ,
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS ;
- 4. GROUND /WELL WATER l Distance Direction Site Code Location (miles) (0)
D-23 Thorsen Well 0.7 180 D-35 Dresden Lock & Dam 0.5 304 !
- 5. SURFACE WATER ,
Distance Direction Site Code Location (miles) (0)
D-21 tilinois River at Ej & E 1.0 285 Railroad Bridge D-22 tilinois River Upstream of Morris 8.0 254 Water Works
- 6. LAKE 3VATG Distance Direction Site Code Location (milef) (")
D-28 Dresden Pool at Illinois 0.5 310 River D-34A Cooling Lake, Dresden 2.6 180 Road Crossing D-34B Cooling Lake, County 3.0 160 Line Crossing
- 7. COOLING WATER Distance Direction Site Code Location (miles) (0)
D-18 Inlet, Unit 1 At Station 0 D-19 Discharge, Unit 1 At Station 0 D-20 Discharge, Unit 2/3 At Station 0 D-50a inlet, Unit 2/3 At Station 0 a Location added to REMP in July of 1996.
I-38 .
i TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION j RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM, SAMPLING LOCATIONS !
l
- 8. ELil Distance Direction l Site Code Location (miles) (0)
D-28 Dresden PoolofIllinois 0.5 310 t River DSP-46(C) DesPlaines River, Upstream
- 9. SHORELINE SEDIMENTS Distance Direction Site Code Location (miles) (0)
D-27 Dresden Lock & Dam 0.5 304 1-39
. l TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION RADIOlW.lCAl. ENVIRONMI:NTAl. MONITORING l'ROGRAht, SAMPl.E Coll.1:CTION AND AN Al.YSl3 Litatum Collection Type of Frequency 3 ample Media Code d Site Irajuency Analysis of Analysis Renurks
- 1. Airborne Onsite and Near Field Continuous Gross Beta Weekly On all emsite and near held samples.
Particulates operation Filter Weekly D-1 Onsite i for a week eschange D-2 Onsite 2 Gamma isot Quarterly D-3 Onsite 3 Gamma Isot. Weekly ~ Gamma imtopic if gross beta in a sample exceeds 5X the average concentration of D-4 Collins Road D-6 Will County Road the preceding calendar quarter for the D-45 McKinley Waxis Road sample kratnm.
Far Field D-7 Gay Pnxiucts D-8 Prairie Parks D-9 (C) Ceul City 8 D-10 Gmwe lake Village D-11 (C) Morris D-12 (C) Lisbon D-13 Minooka D-14 Channahim D-15 (C) Joliet D-16 (C) Elwood D-17 (C) Wilmington
- 2. Airborne Same as 1. Continuous 1-131 Biweekly On all onsite and near field samples.
hxfine operation for two weeks
- 3. Air Sampling Same as 1. -
Test and Weekly On all samplers.
Train Maintenance
- 4. TLD a. Same as 1. Quarterly Garnma Quarterly Two sets of TLD's at all air sampler locations. All sets read Quarterly.
- b. D-101-1,2 Inner Ring Quarterly Gamnu Quarterly All sets read Quarterly.
102-1,2 103-1,2 104-1,2 105-1,2 106-1,2 3 Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other kications are indicators.
. . . - . . . _ . _ - -- . . . ~ _ _ -
TA13LE 5.0-2 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION RADIGIR',1 cal _ ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PR(ERAM, SAMPLE cot.LECTION AND ANALYSFS I watam Col!ctti. n Ty pe of I nyuency Sample Medsa G sted Site frtquency Analysis of Analysis Rem.u ks
- 4. TLD *2 D-107-1,2 (omtinued) 108-1,2 109-1,2 110-3,4 111-1,2 112a-1,2 113-1,2 114-1,2 115-1,2 116-1,2 Y
u 201-1,2 Outer Ring Quarterly Gamma Quarterly All sets read Quasterly.
202-1,2 203-1,2 204-1,2 205-1,2 206-1,2 207-1,2 208-1,2 209-1,2 210-1,2 211-1,2 212-3,4 '
213-1,2 214-1,2 215-1,2 216-1,2 5 Milk D-25 (C) Vince Biros Farm Weekly: 1-131 Weekly On all samples: L'.D: 05 pCi/L D-26 (C) llalpin's Farm May through (Grazing Season).
DSP-42 (C)b Goodwin Dairy '
Ocktwr Monthly: 1-131 Monthly On all samples: LLD 5 pCi/L November Through April a Control (reference) locations are denoted by a "C" after site code. All other krations are indicators.
b Goodwin Dairy went out of business in March of IW6. No replacement dairy found. .
e
_ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ m _-- ,_ _ .-. - ___________m__ - - _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ - - , -___
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION RADIOL OGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM. SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSES laatim Collection Typeof Frequency Ce
- Site l'rnjuency Analysis of Analysis Remarks Sample Media
- 6. Ground /Well D-35 Dresden twk & Dam Quarterly Gross Alpha Quarterly On ali samples Water D-23 Thorsen Well Gross Beta Quarterly On all sampla Tntium Quartert'y On all samples.
- 7. Surface Water D-21 Illinois River at EJ&E Weekly Gamma Isot. Monthly On monthly compaite of wirkly Railroad Bridge samples.
D-22 Illinois River Upstream Weekly Gamma Ixt Monthly On monthly composite of wwkly of Morris Water Works samples.
y Wtykly On all samples.
$ 8. Lake Water D-28 Drt+ h vi at Ilhn Lver Weekly Gross Beta Gamma Lst Weekly~
On all samples.
D-34 A Ctd - .aie, Dresden Em Crossing D-34B Coolmg Lake, County Lme Crossing
- 9. Cooling Water D- 8 Inlet. Unit 1 Weekly Gross Beta Weekly On ali samples.
D-19 Discharge, Unit 1 D-20 Discharge, Unit 2/3 D-503 Inlet, Unit 2/3
- 10. Fish D-28 Dresden Pool of Semiannually Gamma Isot. Semiannually On edible portions only.
Illinois River D-46(C) DesPlaines River, Upstream
- 11. Shoreline D-27 Dresden Ink & Dam Annually Gamma Isot. Annually Saliments a Location added to REMP in July of 19%
i i
- . - - - , - -_ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ - _ . - - - - _ _ .- ..- - . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ .- - - - - . - , . _ - -- - _ , -, - - _ _ _ _ _ . - - _ _ _ ~
TABLE 5.0-2 (continued)
DRESDEN STATION R Al>Iol OGICAI. I'NYlRON\11'.NTAI. MONIT ORING PROGR AM, SAMPI E COI.1 l'CTION ANI) AN AlNSIS twatum Colintion Type of Trequency Sample Matia Cnie Site l'riquenct Analysis of Analysis Remarks
- 12. Lmd Uw Census Milch Animals a. Site boundary to 2 miles -
- a. Enumeration by Annually Dunng grazing seawm.
a door to door or ex;uivalent counting technique.
- b. 2 miles to 5 miles -
- b. Enumerationby Annually During gearing seaxm.
using riderenced information fnwn county agricultural agents or other reliable sources.
I W
- c. At dairies listed in item 5. -
- c. Inquire as to Annually During grazing season.
feeding practes.
- 1. Pastureonly.
- 2. Fsed and c'wp only.
- 3. Pasture and feed:if both, ask farmer to :
estimate fraction of !
food from pasture-
<25%. 25-50%, 50-75%
or >75'A.. '
Nearest in all 16 sectors up to 5 miles Annually Residence ,
Census e
m- ,-w -
,e ,,.v---ee w W e- e t.-- y- - erv -er.-w <- ,m v.c..--+eemw e-tv g-
TABLE 5.0-3 RADIOLOGICAL ENYlRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY SUMM ARY Name of Fachty DrtMen Ntnlear Power Statum . Ikket No. M10. Nur. R)-249 Liwatum et Taolityhtuwtv. Illinois Reportmg Period 1st Guarter 1%
(Cimnty, State)
Sample Type and Indicator Locatum with liighest Control Numtwr of Type Number el locatums Ouarterly Mean Lawata e Non-niutme (Umts) Analye LLD a Results Mean' Mean Range Mean Range locatum Range Air Particulates Gnm Beta 78 0 01 0 024 ( 7 /78) D44. Colltms Road 0 026(I3/13) None 0 (pCi/m )3 (0010-0(40) 0.9 mi @ 26(f (0 01MMO)
Gamma Spec. 6 Cs-134 0.01 <LLD - None O Cs-137 0 01 <tLD - None 0
?
.a. Airtmene latine I-131 36 0 10 <LLD - -
None 0
- 3 (pCi/m )
Gamma ttukgmund Gamma Dm- 98 9.7 14.2 (86/86) D-111 1 18.5(1/1) 12.3 (12/12) c (TLDs) (mR/Qtr.) (11.0-18.5) 0.6 mi H 225' (11 A13.3)
Milk I-131 9 5 None - - cLLD 0 (pCi/L)
Cicling Water Gnns Deta 34 5 6.5 (7/26) D-19, Discharge, 4.4(13/13) 5.2 (1/13) 0 (pCs/L) (56-93) Unit 1, (2.34.3) at Station Surfam Water Gamma Spec. 6 (pCi/L)
Cs-134 to <LLD - -
None O Cs-137 Ill <tLD - - Nor.e o Other Gammas 20 <tLD - -
None 0 a Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Tradum mdecated in parentheses.
TABLE 5.0-3 (continued)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT AL MONITORING PROGRAM QUAR 1TRLY SUMM ARY Nameof Faohty Dreden Nuclear PowerC taten Didet No, M10 M237.50-20 Incatum of IA - . Crundy IIhm Repwtmg Perud 1st Otiarter 1***5 (County, State)
Sample Tywand Indicator locatum with Wglet Control Numtvr of Type Numtvr of treatum Ouartertv Mean I ocatums Non-routine 11 D d Mean a Rmaks (Umt+) / utv .* Mean Mean Rang = IMcatum Range Range take Water Gamma Sgvc. 34 (pCi/L)
C&l34 10 <l.LD - - None O C&l37 10 <LLD - - None 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD - - None O Gross Beta 39 5 65 (12/39) D28 Dresien Pool 7.4 (13/13) None 0 (518.2) of 111mois Rnw
- 05 mi @ 270*
k
%,It Well Water Get s Deta 2 5 14 4 (2/2) D-35 Dresden teck 23.1 (t /l) None 0 (pCi/L) (5 423.1) and Dam, 05 mi@308*
Gnm Alpha 2 4 6.1 (1/1) D-35 Dresden Lock 6.1(1/1) None 0 and Dam, 05 mi @ 308*
Trritum 2 21 6 < LLD - - None 0 Mean and range bawd on detedable measurements only. Fractons indicated in parentheses.
O e
4
- - - , , y
TABLE 5.0-4 RADRUCICAL ENVIRON \1LNTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARIT Rt Y
SUMMARY
Name of Faohty Drmien Nmk-ar I% er Stalps IAxket h. Skl0. 9k237_91-244 twatum of Fanhty Grundt. flhnen. Reportmg Pemt JyLQuarter 1%
(C mnty. State)
Indu ator locatum with Ibgtw Cintnst Numive of Sample Type and Numtvr of 1.watums Ouarterly Mean lawatams Non-routme Tyv a Re ults (t mS) Anahw LLD Mean' Mean Range Mean Range tavatum R.mne N 0 01 0 016 ( 3 /78) b pzig, p, mig 0 016 t13/13) None 0 Aer I'artenstates C.nws ih4 a
@tillbOO23) Statam, tO UIO-0 0t')
(pCi/m )
0.6 mi @ 3&f Gamma Spec. 6 0 01 <LLD - None 0 Anttwwne lodine I-131 42 0.10 <LLD - -
None 0 (pCi/m )
Y
.s. 0 m Gamma fL 6 ground Gamma Dtwe **M 9.7 13.6M86/86) D 111-1, 18.0(1/1) 11.5 (12/12)
(TLDs)(mR/Qtr ) (10.6 180) 0 6 mi O 225' (103 -12.3)
Mdk 20 None <tLD 0 I-131 5/0.5C (pCi/L)
CruAmg Water Gross Beta 34 5 55 (4/26) D-19, Discharge, 3.6 (13/13) <LLD 0 tpCi/L) (51 - 6.1) Unit 1 (2.1-6.1) at Station Surface Water Gamma Spec. 6 (pCi/L)
Cs-1M 10 <tLD - - None O Cs-137 10 <tLD - -
None 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -
None 0
- Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fractums indicated m parentheses.
b 12watums D472. D416 arst IMS had hientecal means of d016 pCi/m3 . Only D-01 is detaded in this summary.
C November - April LLD-5 0 pCi/L , May - Odotvr LLD=U.S Wi/L
TABLE 5.0-4 (continued)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONTR RING PROGRAh! Q ARTERLY SUMM ARY Name of Fanhey_Diddhrewer %ti. n_ Dtyket Na NK 10. Nk237. Nb2L9 twatum of Taolity Crundy. Ilhmus Reportmg Pened 2nd Duarter 1*+
(Cimnty, State)
Sample 'Iygv anst Indicator Ltwatum with liighest Camtrol Ntimtvr of Type Number of locatmins Ouarterly Mean trcatums Non-nmtme (Umts) Analm tLD Mean a ( y,,na mwlts Range Mean R mge tscatmin Range I.ake Water Gamma Spec. 39 (pCi/ L)
Cs-1M 10 <LLD - -
None O Cs-137 10 <LLD - -
None 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -
None O Gnns Beta 39 5 5 8 (4/39) D-28 D esden Ptol 4.4(13/13) Ntme 0 (5.0 - 6.9) of Illin ms River, (2.3 - 6.9) 05 rri e 27tr 7
.s.
N Well Water Gross Beta 2 5 15.5 (1/2) D-3* Dresden lock 15.5(l/1) None 0 (pCi/L) and Dam.
05 mi @ 308' Gross Alpha 2 4 <LLD - -
None O D-23 Thoreen Well, 0.7 mi @ 1M0*
Tntsum 2 2tU 229 (l/2) 229 (1/1) None 0 F'c h Gamma Spec. 10 (PCn/g wet)
Cs-134 0.1 <LLD - -
<LLD 0 Cs-137 0.1 <tLD .
<LLD 0 Other Gammas 0.2 <LLD .
<tLD 0 Bottom %hments Gamma Sper. 1 (pCi/g dry)
C+111 0.2 <LLD - -
None O C&1 t~ 0.2 <tLD - -
None 0 Other Gammas 0.2 <LLD -
None 0 .
Mean and range bawd on detestable measurements only. I raitums nulwattst in panmthews. ',
. . _ _ - - - _ _ _ - - _ - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - - _ _ . _ - . _ - - _ - - . - _ - _ . - - - _ . - - - - - - . _ _ _ . - . _ - - _ - _ _ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - - - .__- . - . _ _ _ - - - _ _ :m
TAULE 5.0-5 RADIOllEtCAL FNVIRONMt NTAL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY SUMM ARY Nameof Faohty DnWen Nthkat.fLmMm31_ Diuket No. 50-10. % 237 % 24.?
bsatam of FaohtyDady. Ilbrus Reportmg Perms! 3rdOuarts r l'*8h (County, State)
%mpic Type and Indwater Lawatam with thghet Contn4 Numtvr of Type Number <4 Lwatuww Ouarterly Mean Lawatums Nim-niutme (Umt4 Anal3 e LLD ye,n a Mean* R**I
Range Mean Range Laatum Range Air Partrulates Gnms Ikta 3 0 01 0 024 C8/78) D416. Will County OK6(13/13) None 0 3 (0 0124)06I) R.ud,1.4 mi @ 132* (0.017-0 061)
(pCi/m )
Gamma Spw. 6 0 01 <LLD . - None 0 Airborne hx! ne I-131 36 0 10 <LLD - - None 0 3
(pCi/m )
- Garnma tkukground Gamma Dwe 98 9.7 14 6(86/86) D-111-1 19.6 (1/1) 12.3 (12/12) 0 (T1.th) (mR /Qtr ) (11.11-19.6) 0.6 mi @ 225* (11.7-13.7)
Milk I-131 26 0.5 None - - <tLD 0 (pCi/L)
Coolmg Water Grtws Beta 52 5 5 6 (4/26) D-19 De<harge. 4 3(13/13) 7.7(5/26) 0 (pCi/ L) (5.3-6.2) Umt 1 (2.7-6.2) (5 0-16.2) at blatum Surfam Water Gamma Spec. 6 (pCi/L)
Cs-134 to <LLD - -
None O Cs-137 10 < tL D - -
None o Other Gammas 20 <LLD - - None 0
- Mean and range based im detectable measurements only. Fractions indwated in parentheses.
TAULE 5 0-5 (continued)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT AL MONITORING PROGRAM QUARTERLY SUMM ARY Name of Faolity Dnsism Nutivar Ptmer Statum Dtdet No. M10. 5a237. %249 bsatam of Faohty Gruntiv. II1nns Reportmg l'ernst 3rdOuarter 1%
(Coimtv. 5 tair)
Sample Type .md Indicator b= atmm w ith Highest Control Numivr of lype Numtvr of 1:watnes Oturterly Abn bwatums Non-nmhne (Umts) Arul3 e LI D Alcan' Mean a Re%ults Ranp- Mean Range bratum Range lake Water Gamma Spec. 39 ,-
(pCi/L)
Cs-134 10 <tLD - -
None O Cs-l'!? 10 <LLD - - Ntme 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD - -
None O Gnws Deta 39 5 6.1 (12/39) D28 Dresdm Pool 5 S 13/13) None 0 y (51-6.8) at Illtruws Rntr, (3.f4.5) 0.5 mi e 27(r e
Well Water Gnws fleta 2 5 165(1/2) D-35 Dresden lock 16.5 (1/1) None 0 (pCi/L) and Dam.
05 mi @ 3tN*
Gnns Alpha 2 4 <LLD - -
None o Tntium 2 200 236(1/2) D-23 Thorsen Well, 236 (1/1) None 0 0.7 mi @ lNP
- Mean and range based on decedable measurements only. Fra<1rons indicated in parentheses.
6 e
8
- - - -- c - _ -
TABLE 5.04 RADIOL OGICAL ENYlRONMI NT AL MONITORING PROGRAM QU ARTTRLY SUMM ARY Name et I Athtylhicqfitstrar Power Natum Dmket No. M 10.S C V. % l12 in atwin 4 racihtv_GruClinvis Reportmg Peruxi _111LGtaritt lui (County, State) indu ator taxatum with liighes t Control Naimtvr of
%mpic Type anti laatuww Nim-roittme Type Numtvr of Iwatuww OuaArr!v Mean LLD Meana Rnulu I U mt<.) Anah e Mean' Range Mean Range Lex atum Range Grm IMa 7M 0 01 0 024( 3 /78) p3b m yg, 00:5(13/13) Nene O Air Partimtates (0 015-0 029)
(pCi/m3) (0 01441035) g,,,,, 3 04mittl#
<LLD Non. O GammaCgve. 0 01 -
6 .
0 10 <LLD - None 0 Airtvrne lmime 1-131 42 -
(pCi/m )
T 97 D-111-1, 18.1(1/1) 11.6(12/12) 0 m Gamma ILxkground Gamma Dow 94 14 4 (86/86)
C (T1.Ds) (mR/Qtr.) (11.3-19.6) 0 6 mi @ 225* (10.7-12.8)
Mdk 12 None - - <LLD 0 1-131 5.0/05c (pCi/L)
Coohng Water Gmss Deta 52 5 6.2 (4/26) D-19, Dncharge, 4 2 (13/13) 6 0(7/26) 0 (pC6 /L) (5.5-6.9) Umt 1, at statum (2.449) (5.2-8.3)
Surface Water Gamma Spec. 6 (PCi/L) None O Cs-134 10 <LLD - -
Cr.-137 10 <LLD - - None 0 Other Gammas 20 <LLD - - None 0 I
8 Mean and rartge based on detettable nwasurementumiy. Fractums indrated in parenthe-es b teratums D-03, D44, and D4w, had identical means of 0 025 pCi/m 3
. Only R03 is detailed in this summary.
C Niwemtvr - Apni i 1.D 5 0 pCi/l.; May - Octoter Lt .D-05 pCs/L
TABLE 5.0-6 (continued)
RADIOLOGICAL FNVIRONMENT AL MONITORING PROGR AM QUARIFRLY $UMM ARY Name of Tanhty DnMen Nmlear Powerstatron DMet No 9b10.9t237. EH Lavatumof Tec.hty Grundt. Ilhnots Reportmg Perust 4th Oturter IM (County, State)
Mmple h pe and Inda ator bration with Ihgl*st Contnd Numtvr of Type Numhv of I ncath ns OttatWt Mt. n I tratioets A w*atin**
(Unit 4 Atuhus lID Mean' Mean d E"N' Range Mean Range levatum Ranc=
bke Water Gamma 5 pet. 39 (pCi/ L)
Cs-1M 10 <LLD - - None o Cul37 to <tLD - - None 0 Ottwr Gammas 20 <LLD + -
Nene O Grtws Deta 39 5 5 8 (11/39) D'28 DWen Pool 5 4 (13/13) None 0 (5.1-6.9) at Ilhnois River, (3.4-6.9) 05 mi @ 27U*
?
t.n Wett Water Grtws ueta 2 5 160(1/2) D-35 Dresden t.nck 160(1/1) None 0
~ (pCi/L) and Dam, 05 mi @ 308*
Grtw Alpha 2 4 5.9(1/2) D-35 Drmien tock 59(1/l) None o and Dam.
05 mi @ 305*
Tntium 2 200 262 (1/2) D-23 Thorsen Well, 262 (1/1) None 0 0.7 mi @ l80*
iA Gamma Spec. 10 (pCi/g wet)
Cs-1M 0.1 <LLD -
<LLD 0 Cs-137 0.1 <tLD - -
<LLD 0 Other Gammas 0.2 <LLD .
- <tLD 0 Dottom Sediments Gamma Spit. 1 (pCi/gdry)
Cs-1 N 0.2 <LLD - -
None o Cs-137 0.2 <LLD - -
None 0 Other Gammas 0.2 <LLD - -
None 0 -
- Mean and range lumi on detn tale nwasurements only. f rattum% irstwahl in panmthms. .
4 m _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ __ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-. _ . -__ ._._ _ _ _ , . . - . . _ - . _ . _ ._ _-z e e e
TABLE 5.1-1 GAMMA RADIATION AS ME'ASURED BY THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS (TLDs)
Commonweelth Edison Company Dates 3 MAR-9 7 - Environmental Site Report for Drepden . Pages 1 Gamma Radiation Measured in mR by TLDs Site Description Quarter l' Ouarter 2 Quarter 3. Quarter 4 1996 1996 1990 1996
- 1. INDICATOR LOCAT10NS -. .
. . . . , . - y
- a. Air Samplers (2 TLDs per l oc a t ion)
D 01 ONSITE STATION 1 14.6 14.1 14.7 14.1 D-02 ONSITE STAT 10N 2 12.9 12.5 e 13.4 12.8
- D - ONSITE STATION 3 11.9 - 11. 4 . 12.2 ---- 41.8 D-04 COLLINS ROAD 14.1 13.6 15.0 13.9 D-06 WILL COUNTY ROAD 13.4 13.2 14.3 13.0 D-07 CLAY PRODUCTS 13.2 12.8 13.5 13.1 D-08' FRA1 rte PARKS 14.2 13.8 15.1 13.9 D-10 GOOSE LAKE VILLAGE 14.0 1J.9 14.6 13.9
-D-13.- MINOOKA 12.7 12.4 13.2 . 12.3 . .
D-14' CHANNAHON 13.3 12.5 14.1 13.1 D-45 MCKINLEY WOODS ROAD 15.7 15.3 16 1 15.8 Air Sampler Mean a S.D. 13.6 t 1.0 13.2 1 1.0 14.2 2 1.1 13.4 e 1.1
- - . . -.-- .- - Annual Air Sampler Mesh e S.D. - - . - - 13.6 a 1.1
- b. Inner R6ng (100 Ser6es) -
D-101-1 14.7 14.6 16.3 14.0
-- . -D-101-2 - 13.8 14.0 14.8 - - --13.9 D-102=1 15.1 15.1 15.7 15.2 D-102-2 15.S 15.1 16.4 15.2 D-103-1 12.9 12.5 13.7 -- - 12.8
- D-103-2 13.1 12.5 13.6 12.7 D-104-1 ,
15.2 14.5 15.9 14.8
+ D-104-2 --
15.5- 15.1 - - 16.7 - - -- - 15.0 -
D-105-1 13.9 14.7 15.4 14.9 D.105-2 13.7 13.6 15.3 13.8 D-104-1 13.1 12.2 14.0 - -. -12.9 D-106-2 11.3 10.7 11.8 11.4 D-107-1 12.0 11.8 11.8 11.7
- D-107-2 12.1 11.2 13.7- 11.7- -
D-108-1 14.9 14.9 15.5 15.3 D*108-2 13.6 13.4 13.8 13.2 D-109-1 14.9 14.3 15.5 - 14.7 D-109 2 13.2 13.8 15.5 14.3 D-110-3 16.9 16.3 18.0 16.8 D-110-4 16.5 15.8 18.0 - 16.9 D-111-1 18.5 18.0 19.6 18.1 0-111-2 16.3 16.6 17.2 15.5
- -' W-1 w g e een 4 e e aO P WW h'eg- w mme m q 9O- @ G
- W O' 8 h $*
6 9
h 1-52
-. . . . . . . . . _ . . . ~ . - - -~ .-
t a !
TABLE 5.1 1 (continued) ;
GAMMA RADIATION AS MEASUR8D BY THERMOLUMINESCENT D6SIMETERS (TLDs) l
~ '
Cates 3-MAR 97' Er.v i r er.me n t a l site Report for Dresden Pages Site Descr6ption Quarter,1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 1996 1996 1996 l996
- b. Inner Ring (100 Ser ies)
D-182A-1 12.5 12.2 13.8 13.5 D-112A-2 13.8 12.9 14.7 13.6 i D 113-l' 12.7 11 6 12.8 12.3 D-113*2- 13.4 12.9 14.4 13.3 l D-114-1 12.4 11.8 12.8 12.2 i D-114-2 13.5 12.1 13.5 12.6 !
D-185-1 13.6 13.3 14.2 13.1
.D-185-2 14.7 14.4 15.7 14.3 D-186-1 15.5 14.7 14.8 14.4 D-116-2 16.3 14.9 16.2 16.1 7 Inner Ring Mean s E.D. 14.2 e 1.6 13.8 e 1.7 15.0 e 1.8' 14.1 s 1.e Annual anner Ring Mean
- S.D. 14.3 e 1.7
~. ..
\
- c. Outer Ring (200 Series)
D-201-1 16.9 16.4 17.2 17.1 1 D-201 2 17.7 16.5 17.9 17.2 I D 202-1 15.6 15.4 e 14.2 13.9 j D-202-2 14.6 13.5 14.7 14.9 D-203-1 12.5 12.1 12.8 11.5 D-203 2 14.5 14.2 14.4 14.1 D 204-1 14.9 13.1 15.4 14.7 D-204-2 13.7 12.6 13.3 12.9 D-205 1 14.5 13.8 14.2 13.6
- D-205-2 15.1 13.8 15.8 34.7 D-206-4 14.2 13.2 14.0 12.9 0-206-2 13.9 13.7 14.5 J 3.3 D 207-1 12.8 12.1 13.0 12.1 D 207-2 12.0 12.6 13.7 11.8 D-206-1 11.6 11.0 12.4 11.3 D-208-2 12.0 11.0 11.6 . 10.7 D-209-1 11.8 10.6 11.9 10.4 D-209 2- 11.0 11.4 11.5 10.3 D-210-1 14.0 12.4 13.8 13.3 D-210-2 15.0 13.9 14.9 13.7 D-211-1 14.5 13.8 15.9 14.0 0-211-2 14.2 15.0 15.5 14.1 D-212 3 12.3 11.4 12.9 12.0 D 212-4 # 12.5 11.4 11.8 11.6 D 213 1 11.4 10.9 12.0 11.2 0 213 2 ,
12.2 11.4 12.6 11.1 D-214-1 16.4 15.4 17.4 16.7 D*214-2 16.6 16.0 16.6 15.8 !
D-215-1 17.1 16.1 16.2 15.7 E-285-2 16.1 14.9 15.0 14.9 D-216-1 17.5 15.5 17.1 16.2 D-216-2 16.4 16.3 17.3 9 16.7 Outer Ring Mean a S.D. 14.3 a 1.9 13.5 s 1.9 14.4 a 1.9 13.6 a 2.1 i i
Ansev a l Outer R6ng Nean
- E.D. 13.9 a 2.0 j i
I M
i l 53 -
l l
/
, . . . .. . - - . . . _.. ..-. - . . ~ . . . . . . . - . . .-
.e.
- TABLE 5.1-1 (contimued)
GAMMA RADIATION AS MEASURED BY THERMOLUMINSCENT DOSIMETERS (TLDs) ,
Pages 3-Env6ronmental Site Report for.Dresden j Datos . 3-MAR 97
-Ouarter 1 -Quarter 2 Cuarter 3 Ouarter 4 Site Description
- 1996 1996 1996 1996 ,
P 4 !
- c. Outer Ring (200 Se r i e s) i 14.2 e 1.7 13.4 s 1.7. 14.7
- 1.8 13.0 a 1.8 INDICATOR LOCATION MEAN 1 S.D.
14.0 s 1.9 {
Annual INDIC ATOR LOCATION MEAN e S.D. ,
1 II. CONTROL LOCATIONS (2 TLDs per'locationn t 11.9 10.8 11.7 10.7 'l
,~
D-C9 COAL CITY 11.8 18.1 11.7 . . 11.0 r
. D-11 . . MORRIS 12.1 11.9 12.4 12.0 i 32.9 I D-82 LISBON 13.3 12.3 13.7 D-15 JOLIET 12.1 11.5 12.1 - 12.0.
D-16 ELWOOD 12.5 11.4 12.2 11.1 i f
i D-17 WILMINGTON !
12.3 & 0.5 - 11.5 t 0.5 12.3 4 0.7.--11.6 a 0.8 l
,. ,y - -, CONTROL LOCATION Mean a S.D.
s 11.9
- 0.7 ;
Annual CQNTROL LOCATION Mein i S.D.
1
- ' III. SPECIAL INTEREST LOCATIONS (1 TLD per location) .
.. .. .. I
. .. _. . - - . ' 15.6 .16.1 16.0 17.1 e l D-306-1 15.0 15.2 15.9 16.1 e f D-306-2 15.9 15.0 16.3 -. 16.7 e i' D-306-3 17.3 15.3 15.3 16.2 e e D-310 1 14.5 15.3 e 14.3 14.9 e i
i D-313-1 13.9 -13.2 14.5 - _ . .14.0.e
- t D-313 2 18.0 e 8.4 15.7
- D-316-1 DAW STORAGE
' 15.7 a 1.5 14.2 4 2.7 15.4 e 0.8 - 15.8 a 1.2 CPECIAL INTEREST LOCATION Nean a S.D. i 15.3 e 1.7 -
Annual SPECIAL INTEREST LOCATION Mean e S.D. . . r IOMMENTS: "a" Indicates lost dos 6 meter. A portion of the Dose was estimated. f
- " Indic ates edited dos 6 meter. The original Dose was replaced with an estimated value.
i :' . ..
l i
J t
L I
i s
b i
t
.an-
~. j 4
I-54 !
s- ,
';g' 6 m- ., ,1m - . _ . .
. .- . , ., - . . - . _ . , . - ~ - _- . . - . _ < - . .
h 9 9
. b
[
b APPENDIX II METEOROLOGICAL DATA 1
^
l l
1
)
11 -
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 i i
STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) l WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph) ,
i WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL ;
n 3 3 N O O O O l NNE O O O O O O O f NE O O 2 0 0 0 2 l ENE O 1 0 0 0 0 1 ,
E O O 1 2 0 0 3 ESE O O 1 0 0 0 1 SE O O O O O O' 'O !
SSE O O O O O O O ,
S O O O O O O O e
SSW 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 3 4 1 8 NW 0 0 0 2 4 0 6 NNW O O O 4 0 0 4 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 1 4 11 8 4 28 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 11- 2
. . t DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION i PERIOD OF RFCORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNST/BLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) i WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET- l i
WIND SPEED (in mph) j WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL l; N O O 1 1 0 3 5 !
NNE O O O O O O O l l
, NE- 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 !
t'
- ENE O 1 1 0 0 0 2 E O O 3 1 0 0 4 i h
I ESE O O 2 2 0 0 4 4
SE O O 4 2 0 0 6 ,
4 SSE O O O O O O O i S O O 1 7 0 0 8 '
SSW O O 1 0 0 2 3 j SW 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 WSW 0 1 1 4 0 0 6 !
l 4
W 0 0 0 4 3 5 12 WNW 0 1 4 8 3 0 16 NW 0 0 3 6 1 0 10 NNW 0 2 1 4 3 0 10 4
VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 5 24 39 10 11 89 i !
Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 2 Hours of missing stability measurement s in all stability classes: 0 II- 3.
- i DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION !
PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) !
. WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET
. [
WIND SPEED (in mph) !
WIND !
DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 ' t 3. -18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL
{
N O O 2 1 2 1 6 NNE O O 1 1 0 0 2 ;
l NE O 2 2 0 0 0 4 ;
r ENE O O 2 0 0 0 2
~
E O O 3 0 0 0 3 ;
i ESE O O 3 0 0 0 3 ,
SE O 1 2 2 1 2 8 SSE O O O 2 0 0 2 i
S 0 0 8 7 0 1 16 SSW 0 0 2 3 3 2 10 $
SW 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 ,
WSW 0 0 1 3 0 1 5 ,
l W 0 1 7 1 5 6 20 t WNW 0 1 4 1 8 6 20
, 1 NW 0 0 1 4 1 0 6 NNW 0 1 3 7 4 0 15 l l l VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 6 43 32 24 19 124 l
Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stabilit- in s: 2 Hours of missing st ability measurement s in all st a!. 'cl ass e s : O 11- 4
f
[
~ '
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION i
PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph) I WIND '
DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL t
N' O 5 12 22 24 16 79 i NNE O 5 8 20 13 10 56 [
NE 1 16 14 16 25 10. 82 i
ENE O 14 24 0 0 0 38 E O O 14 8 0 0 22 ;
ESE 1 2 8 11 0 0 22 t SE 2 8 11 12 22 2 57 ,
SSE 1 2 14 ~22 9 8 56 j l
S 1 1 21 22 12 12 69 ;
SSW 1 4 9 22 17 6 59 .
SW 0 0 3 19 14 12 48 i
WSW 1 4 8 10 6 9 38 l W 2 6 22 25 26 40 121 WNW 1 3 26 32 26 40 128 NW 1 6 27 42 13 6 95 NNW 1 6 21 44 19 10 101 VARIABLE O O O O O O O I
TOTAL 13 82 242 327 226 181 1071 Hours of calm in this st ability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 35 Hours of missing :tability measurement s in all stability classes: 0 II- 5
e - _.~.m . #.u. 2, DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION f
i PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 I STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) -
i l
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL <
l N O O 4 22 19 3 48 NNE O O 15 15 11 2 43 NE 1 9 14 5 1- 0 30 (
9 13 1 0 0 24 :
ENE 1 E O 2 12 12 1 0 27 ;
ESE O 2 0 18 11 0 31 [
SE O 4 2 8 10 2 26 i
2 3 5 24 3 17 54 SSE 0 2 9 49 21 16 97 S ,
6 17 33 14 3 74 SSW 1 SW 0 2 5 18 12 0 37 WSW 0 0 4 15 2 1 22 W 0 1 4 9 6 6 26 i WNW 0 2 4 17 7 0 30 NW 0 5 15 15 2 0 37 NNW 0 0 7 21 12 4 44 O O O O O VARIdBLE O O TOTAL 5 47 130 282 132 54 650 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class: 20 Hours of missin9 stability measurements in all stability classes: 0
~
II- 6
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER-STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >'24- TOTAL N O 2 5 10 4 0 21-NNE O O 2 5 0 0 7 NE- 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 ENE O 1 2 0 0 0 3 E O 4 0 0 0 0 4 ESE O 1 1 2 2 0 6 SE O O O 2 0 0 2 SSE -
0 0 0 6 0 0 6 S O O O 6 2 0 8 SSW 0 0 0 4 3 0 7 SW 0 1 3 12 6 0 22 WSW 0 0 6 9 0 0 15 W 0 0 4 1 1 0 6 WNW O O 3 4 0 0 7 NW 1 0 2 5 0 0 8 NNW 0 2 6 5 1 0 14 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 1 12 35 71 19 0 138 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O Hours of missing stability measurement s in all stability classes: 0
~
Il- 7
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION t PERIOD OF RECORD: JANUARY-MARCH 1996 STABILITY l CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE' (DIFF-TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET i i
WIND. SPEED (in mph) i WIND l DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TO1AL ,
N O O O O O O O NNE O 1 0 0 0 0 1 i NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O i r
-E O 1 0 0 0 0 1 :
ESE O O O O O O O SE~ 0 0 0 0 0 0- 'O ,
SSE O O 1 0 0 0 1 S O O O 1 0 0 1 SSW 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 -
I SW 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 l
WSW 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 l
W 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 I WNW 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 NW 0 0 1 4 0 0 5 4
NNW 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 i VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 3 7 13 2 0 25 q J
1 t
Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 l Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O l Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 !
l 1
i l
11- 8 1
4
)
+
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION- ,
i PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE. (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET l 1
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL :
DIRECTION _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ )
N O O 2 7 0 0 9 O O 11 1 0 0 12 NNE ,
O O 3 3 0 0 6 '
NE I 1
O 5 0 0 0 0 5 ENE 6 5 2 0 14 E O 1 l
I O O 1 2 0 0 3 ESE 0 2 0 0 0' 0: ~2 SE:
O O O 1 0 0 1 SSE O O O 1 3 4 j S O 3
0 0 1 1 1 2 5 SSW SW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 WNW NW 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 1 0 3 NNW O O O O O O VARIABLE O 0 13 21 26 6 7 73 TOTAL Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 11- 9 MM, e , +4 2
l l
l'd DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION-PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996 STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 1 6 8 0 0 15 NNE O O 4 1 0 0 5 NE O O 6 3 0 0 9 ENE O 4 4 0 0 0 8 E O 4 0 3 1 0 8 ESE O 3 2 1 1 0 7 SE O O O 1 0 0 1 SSE O O 3 2 2 0 7 S 0 0 1 2 0 3 6 SSW 0 1 3 1 4 2 11 SW 0 2 2 0 4 1 9 WSW O O O 1 1 0 2 W 0 0 1 2 1 0 4 WNW 0 0 3 5 0 5 13 NW 0 0 3 4 1 0 8 NNW 0 0 4 2 1 0 7 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 15 42 36 16 11 120 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 2 .
Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 11- I 0
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996
' STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 5 2 4 0 0 11 NNE O 3 4 1 0 0 8 NE O 5 2 2 0 0 9 ENE O 4 6 0 0 0 10 E O 3 4 0 0 0 7 ESE O 2 0 0 1 0 3 SE O 5 1 1 0- 0 7 SSE O 3 4 2 1 0 10 S 0 0 3 3 2 2 10 SSW 0 1 3 3 0 2 9 i SW 0 3 2 2 4 3 14 WSW 0 2 3 4 2 0 11 W 0 2 3 9 1 0 15 l WNW 0 3 6 5 1 4 19 NW 0 3 10 3 4 0 20 NNW 0 1 1 2 2 0 6 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 45 54 41 18 11 169 Hours of calm in this st ability class: 0 ,
Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 4 i Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 l l
l l
11- II l l
i
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND TOTAL DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 7 11 13 10 0 41 N O 11 10 21 16 0 59 NNE 1 17 33 0 0 61 NE 1 10 20 45 18 1 0 85 ENE 1 20 27 15 0 77 E O 15 8 3 6 3 0 21 ESE 1 f
8 8 8 10 0 34 SE O 3 7 7 9 2 28 SSE O 3 8 8 10 4 34 S 1 2 12 12 7 15 48 SSW 0 5 10 14 9 10 48 SW 0 6 26 9 7 4 52 WSW 0 5 22 14 8 5 56 W 2 16 29 12 4 71 WNW 3 7 4 13 9 10 2 39 NW 1 i 4 4 13 6 1 29 NNW 1 O O O O O O VARIABLE O 118 232 241 133 47 783 )
TOTAL 12 I
Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 25 1
i Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: J 1
)
1 11- 1 2 l
i
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O 1 8 9 5 0 23 NNE 1 7 16 23 3 1 51 NE O 9 21 17 2 0 49 ;
ENE 5 24 33 21 1 0 84 E 1 9 25 30 8 0 73 i ESE 1 5 14 12 0 0 32 SE O O 19 24 1 0 44 SSE O 2 15 13 11 4 45 S O 2 11 13 18 14 58 SSW 2 2 1 28 16 15 64 SW 3 4 12 13 22 13 67 WSW 0 4 18 21 17 6 66 W 1 1 10 7 6 0 25 WNW 0 7 14 20 3 1 45 NW 0 3 5 6 1 0 15 NNW 0 0 3 2 4 0 9 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 14 80 225 259 118 54 750 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 27 -
Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: O e
!!-13 p ,,-y.. 9rw- --,
i DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996 ,
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
I WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N 1 1 2 1 4 0 9 NNE O O 1 0 0 0 1 NE O 1 1 1 0 0 3 ENE O 2 1 0 0 0 3 O O 2 3 0 0 5 E
ESE 2 2 3 9 1 0 17 1
SE O 1 3 5 0 0 3 l SSE 1 1 2 9 0 0 13 S O 2 0 5 0 0 7 SSW 0 2 1 3 8 0 14 i SW 2 5 8 9 5 0 29 WSW 2 0 10 3 3 0 18 W 2 6 11 6 0 0 25 WNW 0 2 9 6 0 0 17 NW 1 2 2 1 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 4 NNW 1 O O O O O O VARIABLE O TOTAL 11 27 57 64 21 0 180 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class: 7 i Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 l 1
11- 1 4
a a DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION ,
PERIOD OF~ RECORD: APRIL-JUNE 1996 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET l WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 -> 24 TOTAL P
N O O O O O O O NNE 1 0 0 0 .0 0 1 NE 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 ENE O O O O O O O E O O 1 0 0 0 1 ESE O O O O 2 0 2
.SE O -1 0 1 Oc 0 2 SSE O O O 3 0 0 3 l
S 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 SSW 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
$W 0 1 2 1 3 0 7 WSW 0 1 7 1 0 0 9 l I
W 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 j 6 :
WNW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 )
NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,
1 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 2 5 11 19 7 0 44 Hours of calm in this stability class: .0 Hours of missing-wind measurements in this stability class: 0
- Hours of missing stability measurement s in all stability classes: 0 11- I 5
I DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) l WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET l WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL i N O 5 6 0 0 0 11 NNE O 5 5 7 4 0 21 NE O 4 6 3 2 0 15 l ENE O 1 4 0 0 0 5 O 5 8 2 0 0 15 ;
E O 6 2 0 0 0 8 ESE i SE O 7 9 0 0- 0 16 i
SSE O O 3 0 0 0 3 !
l S O 1 3 0 0 0 4 !
SSW 0 1 1 2 1 0 5 SW 0 0 2 1 0 0 3
\
WSW 0 1 4 0 0 0 5 1 1
W 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 WNW 0 1 1 5 2 1 10 NW 0 0 1 7 1 0 9 NNW 0 0 1 11 0 0 12 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 37 56 41 10 1 145 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurement s in all st ability classes: 0 11- 1 6
- .-. ~ _ - -
ORESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION i l
PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 f STABILITY CLASS.- MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) i WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET l WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL j i
N O 5 1 3 0 0 9 l 1
NNE O 6 1 2 1 0 10 NE O 4 3 1 1 0 9 -
ENE O 5 1 1 0 0 7 l J
E O 3 1 0 0 0 4 ESE O 4 3 0 0 0 7 SE O 7 6 0 0 0 13 SSE 1 3 0 0 1 0 5 S 0 1 4 1 0 0 6 ,
i SSW 0 1 2 6 0 0 9 I SW 0 3 3 3 2 0 11 WSW 0 7 2 2 1 0 12 l W 0 1 2 4 0 0 7 j i
0 15 ;
WNW 1 0 2 9 3
, I NW 1 2 8 7 0 0 18 l
NNW 0 1 3 1 0 0 5 I
VARIABLE O O O O O O O ;
l TOTAL 3 53 42 40 9 0 147 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 ;
Hours of missing wind measurement s in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all st ability classes: 0 11- 1 7
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND TOTAL 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 DIRECTION ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
6 5 0 0 13 N O 2 4 1 1 0 0 7 NNE 1 O 6 1 1 0 0 8 NE O 3 3 0 0 0 6 ENE 3 0 2 0 0 6 E 1 0 0 0 0 3 ESE O 3 3 2 0 0. 0 5 SE. 0 0 1 0 4 SSE O 2 1 2 4 7 1 0 16 S 2 4 5 2 2 0 14 SSW 1 3 3 6 1 0 14 SW 1 5 0 17 WSW 0 10 1 1 0 4 4 3 0 0 11 W
4 19 4 1 0 29 WNW 1 0 1 5 7 1 0 1 NW 3 4 3 0 12 NNW O 2 O O O O O O VARIABLE O 56 62 43 11 0 179 TOTAL 7 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: O Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 11-18
. l DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 l STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) >
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET r
WIND SPEED (in mph) .
l WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL j N 3 6 5 6 0 0 20 NNE 1 5 2 7 2 0 17 NE 1 11 8 8 1 0 29 l ENE 4 19 17 4 0 0 44 E 2 3 14 4 2 0 25 i ESE 2 8 6 1 6 0 23 SE 1 12 8 0 1 0 22 SSE 1 17 12 10 0 0 40 S 2 7 7 4 5 0 25 l
SSW 3 6 11 7 2 0 29 l SW 3 10 9 11 3 0 36 C
WSW 2 10 10 9 0 0 31 .
~
W 3 14 13 20 3 0 53 l 1
WNW 4 9 19 11 1 0 44 NW 3 11 16 14 4 0 48 ,
i NNW 4 8 16 15 4 0 47 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 39 156 173 131 34 0 533 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 l Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 ;
Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 !
11- 1 9 i
t DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION i
PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF. TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET l WIND SPEED (in mph) [
WIND l DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL !
N 1 8 12 10 8 0 39 i NNE 2 6 13 12 0 0 33 s NE 2 9 13 6 0 0 30 -
ENE 4 16 24 3 0 0 47 ;
E 1 10 25. 17 1 0 54 ESE 1 6 13 24 3 3 50 !
53 SE 1 11 18 17 3 3 SSE 1 7 17 26 3 1 55 l S -
3 3 18 18 10 1 53 4
SSW 1 5 26 12 8 0 52
- SW 0 6 12 18 5 0 4 41 WSW 3 2 10 11 6 0 32 i
W 2 5 17 18 3 0 45 '
WNW 1 7 14 17 2 0 41 NW 1 9 19 19 1 0 49 NNW 1 6 18 18 3 0 46 I
VARIABLE O O O O O O O 1
)
TOTAL 25 116 269 246 56 8 720 1
Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in tnis stability class: 0 Hours of. missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 11- 2 0 1
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION l i
PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 j i
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) .
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph) !
WIND t DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL l N O 4 20 5 2 0 31 l NNE 1 6 13 10 1 0 31 :
NE 1 7 10 3 0 0 21 ENE O 5 4 0 0 0 9 ,
E O 8 5 2 0 0 15 -
ESE 1 4 19 7 0 0 31 !
SE O 5 10 19 0 0 34 i SSE 1 2 10 11 0 1 25 S 1 6 9 7 5 0 28 SSW 3 5 5 11 2 0 26 SW 5 2 8 12 0 0 27 WSW 2 5 13 10 0 0 30 W 2 4 9 3 0 0 18 WNW 2 5 4 8 0 0 19 1 NW 2 10 10 14 0 0 36 NNW 2 4 8 5 2 0 21 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 23 82 157 127 12 1 402 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurement s in all stability classes: 0 11- 2 1
o ,
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION l PERIOD OF RECORD: JULY-SEPTEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) l WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET j WIND SPEED (in mph)
- WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL -
N O 1 8 4 1 0 14 NNE O 1 2 8 0 0 11 ;
NE O 7 1 1 0 0 9 ENE 3 3 0 0 0 0 6 E O O O O O O O :
ESE O O O O O O O SE O 1 1 3 2- O. 7 SSE O O 1 0 0 0 1 S 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 SSW 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 SW 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 WSW 0 0 5 8 0 0 13 W 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 WNW 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 NW 1 2 0 3 0 0 6 NNW 0 0 2 5 0 0 7 VARIABLE O O O O O O O ,
TOTAL 5 16 24 34 3 0 82 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 0 II-22
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF REC 0HD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND OIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O O O O O O NNE O O O O O O O NE O O' O O O O O ENE O 2 2 0 0 0 4 E O O O O O C 0 ESE O O O O O O O
.SE. 0 0 2 1 0 04 ~3 SSE O O O O O O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
.i WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WNW 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 NW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 0 2 4 2 1 0 9 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 44 T
11- 2 3
o ORESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 l
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT) !
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET- i WIND SPEED (in mph) i i
WINO DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL i O O O O 3 0 3 N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !
NNE- t O 1 0 0 0 0 1 NE 3 0 0 0 4 ENE O 1 O O 2 0 0 0 2 E .
O O 1 0 0 0 1 ESE .
O O O 1 0 0 1 SE ,
O O 2 0 1 0 3 SSE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i S t 0 0 1 6 0 0 7 SSW 0 4 0 0 4 -
SW 0 0 :
0 0 0 4 2 0 6 WSW i
0 0 0 2 4 6 i W 0 0 0 3 1 5 1 10 !
WNW 0 2 4 0 0 7 NW 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 NNW O O O O O O l VARIABLE O 0 5 15 20 13 5 58 ,
TOTAL Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stabilit y measurements in all stability classes: 44 ;
i i
+
1 11 24 i
f
DRESDEN. NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph) -
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL !
N 0 O O 1 0 0 1 NNE O O O 1 0 0 1 !
NE O 2 0 0 0 0 2 ;
ENE 0 2 2 0. 0 0 4 ,
E O 1 0 0 0 0 1 ESE 1 1 2 0 0 0 4 j SE 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 SSE O 2 2 0 2 0 6 S 0 1 2 1 3 0 7 i SSW 0 0 0 8 3 0 11 SW 0 0 2 6 0 0 8 WSW 0 0 1 7 0 0 8 W 0 0 0 4 1 3 8 WNW 0 0 3 3 1 3 10 NW 0 0 2 10 0 0 12 NNW 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 1 10 19 43 11 6- 90 Hours of calm in this stability class: .
O Hours of missing wind measurements in this st ability class: 0 I Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 44 11- 2 5 -
t
,y,w, ---- - - - . ,. .
l 'o
- j l
.DRESD$N NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - NEUTRAL (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET ,
WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL DIRECTION 1-3 N O 17 19 29 17 0 82 NNE O 11 13 17 6 0 47 NE O 9 3 1 O O 13 ,
4 9 16 1 0 0 30 ,
ENE t E 2 6 15 6 0 0 29 4
i ESE O 5 11 9 4 0 29 SE O 3 9 16 18 10 56 ;
a SSE 1 6 18 43 29 7 104 i
S 1 6 16 27 26 2 78 l SSW 2 7 7 7 11 6 40 SW 2 12 8 14 4 0 40 WSW 1 10 13 27 7 1 59 W 3 10 26 61 40 21 161 WNW 5 7 24 62 34 8 140 NW 0 13 17 53 9 0 92 NNW 2 11 17 9 6 0 45 VARIABLE O O O O O O O 1
TOTAL 23 142 232 382 211 55 1045 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours of missin9 wind measurements in this stability class: 9 Hours of missing st ability measurements in all stability classes: 44 11- 2 6
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 STABILITY CLASS - SLIGHTLY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL DIRECTION 1-3 N .0 4 4 17 3 0 28 ,
flNE O 3 10 3 7 0- 23
'NE 1 8 12 7 3 0 31 i O 9 20 4 0 0 33 l ENE E O 2 4 11 0 0 ,17 0 9 19 9 1 39 ESE 1 SE O 4 19 37 5 3 68 O 3 19 25 14 10 71 i SSE S 0 1 16 36 46 11 110 SSW' O 2 4 42 23 9 80 l 0 2 6 18 1 4 31 SW WSW 0 0 11 15 2 1 29 W 1 2 13 38 10 4 68 WNW 0 9 14 20 5 1 49 NW 0 5 9 33 1 0 48 NNW -0 3 8 35 0 0 46 VARIABLE O O O O O O O !
l TOTAL 3 57 178 360 129 44 771 Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 Hours'of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 9 i Hours of missin9 stability-measurements in all stability classes: 44
! l l
11 2 7 l
l
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERIOD OF RECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996 '
STABILITY CLASS - MODERATELY STABLE (DIFF-TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET WIND SPEED (in mph)
WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL N O O 7 4 2 0 13 NNE O O O 5 0 0 5 NE O O O O O O O ENE O 1 0 0 0 0 1 i E O O O O O O O ESE 1 0 3 3 1 0 8 SE O 'O 3 10 0 0 13 SSE O 4 13 7 2 0 26 S 0 3 3 6 0 0 12 SSW 0 1 2 6 9 1 19 SW 1 0 4 4 0 0 9 WSW 0 2 0 4 0 0 6 W 1 2 13 6 0 0 22 WNW 0 0 4 4 3 0 11 NW 0 0 2 2 0 0 4 l NNW 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 VARIABLE O O O O O O O
. TOTAL 3 14 54 62 17 1 151
. Hours of calm in this stability class: 0 ;
4 Hours of missing wind measurements in this stability class: 0 Hours of missing stability measurements in all stability classes: 44 l l
i 11-28 l
. . t i
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION 1 j PERIOD OF R'ECORD: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1996
' j STABILITY CLASS - EXTREMELY STABLE (DIFF TEMP 300-35 FT)
WINDS MEASURED AT 300 FEET l WIND SPEED (in mph) l l WIND DIRECTION 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 > 24 TOTAL ;
e i N O O O 1 0 0 1 4 t NNE O O O 3 0 0 3 t
< NE O O O O O O O ENE O O O O O O O /
E O O O O O O O j ESE O O O O O O O )
i SE O O O O O O O l;
I SSE 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 !
a S 2 1 1 0 0 0 4 i SSW 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 SW 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 L WSW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l
W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .
WNW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )
NW 0 0 1 4 0 0 5 j i
NNW 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 ,
I VARIABLE O O O O O O O TOTAL 3 2 3 13 1 0 22 l
Hours of calm -in this stabi1ity ciass: 0 Hours of missing wind measurements in this st abilit y class: 0 Hours of missing st ability measurements in all stability classes: 44 4
11- 2 9
, , _ _ y _ . . _ _ . . . , _ _
t i
APPENDIX III i
l LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES n
o p
III- 1
i DRESDEN 3.0 LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES Expected Collection Sample Type d Location Date Reason TLD D-202-01 29 June 1996 TLD missing from location due to removal of utility pole. Dose estimated in Table 3.1-1.
Air Samnline Variancesb AP/l D-02 27 January 1996 Flow rate outside 10%; sample volume not significantly affected.
d AP/l = Air Particulate / Air lodine b
Air Sampling Variances are samples which have not been missed but indicate unusual sample results or factors which may contribute to sample anomalies.
111-2 1
1
4 l
APPENDIX IV .
MILCH ANIMALS,NEARESTLIVESTOCK, AND NEAREST RESIDENCES CENSUSES 6
F l
IV-1
i DRESDEN .
MILCil ANIMALS CENSUS,1996 A. There are no dairy farms within a 6.5 mile radius of Dresden Station.
B. Samnling Locations D-25 V. Biros Dairy Farm i1.4 miles @ 220 Number of cows being milked - 94 Diet consists of: 25% pasture '
25% ground grain 50% green chop D-26 11alpins Dairy Farm 16.0 miles @ 175 Number of cows being milked - 55 Diet consists of: 10% or less pasture 25% ground grain 65% green chop, hay or silage Sherman Tweet Farma 8.5 miles @ 338*
Number of cows being milked - 40 Diet consists of: 25% pasture 25% ground grain 50% hay or silage a Farm does not wish to participate in program at this time.
Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 20,1996.
IV- 2
. , 1 DRESDEN ,
1 i
NEAREST LIVESTOCK CENSUS,1996 l 1
Nearest livestock of the Dresden Station within a 6.5 mile radius. !
l l
Sector Directio.11 Distance )
i l
A N 1.4 miles i
B NNE 6.0 miles C NE 2.5 miles l l
D ENE 4.7 miles E E None i
F ESE None l G SE None 11 SSE None J S 1.2 miles K SSW l.2 miles L SW None M WSW None N W 0.5 miles P WNW 0.5 miles Q NW 0.5 miles R NNW l .0 miles Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 20,1996.
i IV- 3
DRESDEN NEAREST RESIDENCE CENSUS,1996 Nearest resident of the Dresden Station within a 6.5 mile radius.
Sector Direction Distance A N 1.2 miles B NNE 0.8 miles C NE 2.3 miles D ENE 0.8 miles E E 1.1 miles F ESE 1.0 miles G SE 0.6 miles 11 SSE 0.5 miles J S 0.5 miles K SSW 3.3 miles L SW 3.7 miles M WSW 5.8 miles N W 3.5 miles P WNW 3.7 miles Q NW 2.6 miles R NNW 0.8 miles Census conducted by A. Lewis on August 20,1996.
IV- 4
.: c ,
A t
b f
APPENDIX V INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS 6
9 4
t 1
I h
4 V- 1
_ - ~ - - .- - .- - .. -__ _- -- . -_
Apoendir V Interlaborainry enmparkan Procram Resnh Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest Laboratory (formerly Teledyne Isotopes and Hazelton Environmental Services) has participated in interlaboratory comparison (crosscheck) f programs since the formulation of its quality control program in December 1971. 'these programs are -
operated by agencies which supply environmental type samples (e.g., milk or water) containing concentrations of radionuclides know to the issuing agency but not to participant laboratories. The purpose j of such a program is to provide an independent check on the laboratory's analytical procedures and to alert ,
it to any possible problems.
Participant laboratories measure the concentration of specified radionuclides and report them to the i issuing agency. Several months later, the agency reports the known values to the participant laboratories '
and specifies control limits. Results consistently higher or lower than the known values or outside the control limits indicate a need to check the instruments or procedures used.
'Ihe results in Table A-1 were obtained through participation in the environmental sample crosscheck '
program for milk, water, air filters, and food samples during the current year. *Ihis program is conducted by '
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Developement National Exposure l
Research Laboratory Characterization Research Division-las Vegas, Nevada.
Table A-2 lists results of the analyses on in-house " spiked" samples.
Table A-3 lists results of the in-house " blank" samples.
Table A-4 lists results of the in-house " duplicate" program.
Table A-5 list results of the mixed analyte performance evaluation program.
i Table A-6 list results of the Environmental Measurement Laboratory Quality Assessment Program.
Out-of-limit results are explained directly below the result.
i l
1 l
l l
l i
V- 2 i
Tcble A 1. U.S. Environmental Protectie Agency's crosscheck program, comparison of EPA and Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental krvices, Midwest Laboratory results for various sample media'.
Concentrationin pCi/L' I
Date EPA Result' Control TBEESML Results lab Sample i 2 Sigma'
ode Type Collected Analysis 1s, N=1 Limits r Jan,1996 Gr. Alpha 12.115.0 3.4 - 20.8 19.5 i 1.5;2.8 STW-752 Water Gr. Beta 7.0i 5.0 0.0 - 15.7 7.9i 0.7;1.4 STW 752 Water Jan,1996 Feb,1996 I-131 67.017.0 54.9 - 79.1 70.7 i 1.5;7.2 STW-753 Water Mar,1996 H3 22002.0 i 2200.0 18185.1 - 25818.9 22776.7 1 185.0;3103.1 STW 761 Water Results were indavertently not reported due to administrative error in laboratory.
74.8 18.7 42.4 - 107.2 63.812.4;8.1 STW-762 Water Apr,1996 Gr. Alpha STW 762 Water Apr,1996 Ra-226 3.0i0.5 2.1-3.9 2.9io.1;03 Ra-228 5.0113 2.7-73 4.6 t 0.2;0.5 STW 762 Water Apr,1996 58.4 i 5.8 483 - 68.5 57.910.5;5.8 STW-762 Water Apr,1996 Uranium :
Co40 31.015.0 22 3 - 39.7 32.7 i 0.6;4.7 STW-763 Water Apr,19D l Cs-134 46.0 i 5.0 373 - 54.7 43.0il.0;63 STW-763 Water Apr,1996 Cs-137 50.0 i 5.0 413 - 58.7 523 i 2.1;7.8 STW-763 Water Apr,1996 Water Apr,1996 Gr. Beta 166.9 1 25.0 123.5 - 2103 154.9 i 6.8:24.8 STW-763 Sr-89 43.015.0 34 3 - 51.7 42.0 i 3.6;5.5 STW 763 Water Apr,1996 Sr-90 16.015.0 7 3 - 24.7 153i2.9;33 STW-763 Water Apr,1996 Ba 133 745.0 75.0 614.9 - 875.1 745.0 i 19.5;109.0 STW 764 Water Jun,1996 Water Jun,1996 Co-60 99.015.0 903 - 107.7 97.013.6;14.4 STW-764 Water Jun,1996 Cs-134 79.015.0 703 - 87.7 723 i 1.2;10.5 STW-764 197.0 i 10.0 179.7 - 214 3 2013 i 2.3;29.1 STW-764 Water Jun,1996 Cs-137 300.0 30.0 248.0 - 352.0 298.0 1 6.2;43.4 l STW-764 Water Jun,1996 Zn-65 4.9 0.7 3.7-6.1 4.810.1;0.5 !
STW 765 Water Jun,1996 Ra-226 STW-765 Water Jun,1996 Ra-228 9.0 23 5.0 - 13.0 8.710.5;1.0 STW-765 Water Jun,1996 Uranium 20.2 i 3.0 15.0 - 25.4 20.410.8:2.2 STW-767 Water Jul,1996 Sr-89 25.015.0 163 - 33.7 24.0 2.0;3.1 Water Jul,1996 Sr-90 12.015.0 3 3 - 20.7 113il.2;1.6 STW-767 l Water Jul,1996 Gr. Alpha 24.416.1 13.8 - 35.0 20.112.0;3.1 STW-768 Water Jul,1996 Gr. Beta 44.8 i 5.0 36.1 - 53.5 40.4 i 3.2;7.0 STW 768 V-3
Tcble A-1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's crosscheck program, comparison of EPA rnd Tcledyne Brown I
Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest laboratory results for various sample media *.
Concentrationin pCi/L" TBEESML Results I lab Sample Date EPA Result' Control d 1s, N=1 Limits i 2 Sigma Cnde Type Collected Analysis Ra 226 14.012.1 10.4 - 17.6 13.6 i 0.4;1.4 STW-774 Water Sep,1996 Ra 228 4.7t1.2 2.6-6.8 5.4 i 0.4;0.6 i STW-774 Water Sep,1996 Uranium 10.113.0 4.9 - 15.3 10.0i o.2;1.0 STW 774 Water Sep,1996 Oct,1996 I131 27.016.0 16.6 - 37.4 26.7 i 2.3;3.5 STW-775 Water Oct,1996 Gr. AIpha 10.315.0 1.6 - 19.0 10.2 i 2.1;2.4 STW-778 Water Oct,1996 Gr. Beta 34.615.0 25.9 - 43.3 32.0i l.6;5.2 l STW-778 Water
- Results obtained by Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Midwest Laboratory as a participant in l
the envimnmental sample crosscheck program operated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Developement National Exposure Research Laboratory Characterization Research Division-Las '
Vegas, Nevada.
- All results are in pCi/L, except for elemental potassium (K) data in milk, which are in mg/L; air filter samples, which are in pCi/ filter; and food products, which are in uCi/kg.
j
' USEPA results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma,1 determination) j and controllimits as defined by the EPA.
- Unless otherwise indicated, the TBEESML results are given as the mean i 2 standard deviations for three ,
determinations. The numbers after the semi-colon are the Total Propagated Uncertainty of the result.
i 1
h b
r r
V-4 l
l
- . l Tcble A 2. In-house" spike" samples.
t Concentrationin pCi/L' TBEESML Results i
. I.ab Sample Date Accepted Known Type Control Limits
- 2s, n=1' 4 CW Collected Analysis Reiected Activity ;
SPCH-607 Charcoal Feb,1996 I 131(g) A 03 0.2-03 03i0.0;0.0 j Canister l SPAP409 Air Filter Feb,1996 Cs-137 A 1.9 1.5-23 2.2 t o.0;0.2 i SPAP411 Air Filter Feb,1996 Gr. Beta A 8.0 6.5 - 9.5 6.810.0;0.7 i SPW-621 Water Feb,1996 I-131 A 95.9 77.7 - 114.1 86.210.7;8.6 SPW421 Water Feb,1996 I131(g) A 95.9 75.6- 116.2 %.2 i 4.7;10.7 l
SPW422 Water Feb,1996 Gr. Alpha A 82.8 62.8- 102.8 % .4 i 6.6;11.7 ;
SPW422 Water Feb,1996 Gr. Beta A 85.7 68.1- 1033 83.7 i 3 3;9.0 i SPW423 Water Feb,1996 H 3 A 17833.0 14185 3 - 21480.7 18228.7 i 3913:1864.4 i SPW424 Water Feb,1996 Co40 A 2393 188.1- 290.5 231.0 i 14.5;273 .(
SPW424 Water Feb,1996 Cs-137 A 4283 336 3 - 520 3 4283 1 24.1:49.1 SPMI425 Milk Feb,1996 Cs-137 A 53.5 41.1 65.9 63.1 3.2;7.1 l
SPMI425 Milk Feb,1996 I-131 A 48.0 383 - 57.6 47.810.7;4.8 l SPM1425 Milk Feb,1996 I-131(g) A 48.0 37.6- 58.4 48.012.9:5.6 l SPVE-1068 Vegetation Feb,1996 I-131(g) A 0.8 0.6 - 0.9 0.810.0;0.1 i SPMI-2217 Milk Apr,1996 Cs 134 A 37.1 29.1- 45.1 35.4 i 2.5;4.3 SPMI-2217 Milk Apr,1996 Cs-137 A 106.6 83.1 - 130.1 117.2 i 5.4;12.9 SPW-2219 Water Apr,1996 Co40 A 23.4 16.8- 30.0 26.013.4:4.2 SPW-2219 Water Apr,1996 Cs-134 A 37.1 28.7- 45.5 36.li 2.9:4.6 SPW 2219 Water Apr,1996 Cs-137 A 106.6 82.6- 130.6 117.1 1 6.4;13.4 SPW-2221 Water Apr,1996 Gr. Alpha A 82.8 64.7- 100.9 76.916.1;9.8 SPW-2221 Water Apr,1996 Gr. Beta A 136.8 109.0- 164.6 132315.0;14.2 SPW 2223 Water Apr,1996 H 3 A 17937.0 14354.0 - 21520.0 17538.9 i 354.1;1789 3 SPW-2283 Water Apr,1996 I 129 A 14.9 11 3 - 18.6 15.7 i 1.4;2.1 SPW-2285 Water Apr,1996 Fe-55 A 1.1 0.5 - 1.7 1.210.5;0.5 SPW-2287 Water Apr,1996 Tc-99 A 66.0 48.8 - 83.2 70.517.9;10.6 SPW 2289 Water Apr,1996 Am-241 A 82.8 66.8 - 95.8 77.4 i 0.4;7.8 SPW 2289 Water Apr,1996 Cm-244 A 36.4 28.6 - 44.2 37.911.7;4.2 SPW-2291 Water Apr,1996 Th 230 A 45.0 35.9 - 54.1 41.6 t l.9;4.6 SPW 2292 Water Apr,1996 U 238 A 45.4 35.8 - 55.0 46.2 i 2.0;5.0 SPF 3420 Fish May,1996 Cs-137 A 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.110.0;0.0 SPW-3439 Water May,1996 1 131 A 25 3 20.2- 30.4 23.9 i 0.8;2.5 SPMI 3441 Milk May,1996 1131 A 25 3 20.4 - 30.2 23.5 i 0.5;2.4 SPMI - Milk Jun,1996 Cs-134 A 31 3 243-383 28.112.6;3.8 SPMI - Mllk Jun,1996 Cs 137 A 42.5 323 - 52.7 47.013.7;6.0 SPMI- M11k Jun,1996 1131(g) A 40.4 31.0 - 49.8 39.413.6;5.3 i SPMI-4054 Milk Jun,1996 Cs-134 A 31 3 243-383 28.1 i 2.6:3.8 V-5 l
_ _ ___ _____ _ _j
4 6 Table A-2. In-house " spike" samples.
Concentrationin pCi/L' Date Accepted Krown TBEESML Results bb Sample 2s, n=1' Code Type Collected Analysis Reiected Activity Control IJmits* l SPMI-4054 Milk Jun,1996 Cs-137 A 42.5 323 - 52.7 47.0 i 3.7:6.0 l M11k Jun,1996 I131 A 40 3 32.7- 47.9 35.7 i 0.6;3.6 SPMI-4054 Milk Jun,1996 1-131(g) A 40.4 31.0- 49.8 39.4 i 3.6;5.3 SPMI-4054 Water Jun,1996 Gr. AIpha A 82 7 66.6 - 98.8 70.0 i 3.6;7.9 SPW-4246 Jun,1996 Cr. Beta A 136.1 108.1 - 164.1 140.5 1 3.2;14.4 SPW-4246 Water Jul,1996 Cs-137 A 1.9 1.5-23 2.2 i 0.0;0.2 SPAP-4750 Air Filter Jul,1996 Co-60 A 112.6 82.7 - 142.5 105.7 i 15.4;18.7 SPW-4936 Water ]
Jul,1996 Cs 134 A 135.2 104.9- 165.5 127.1 1 10.9;16.7 SPW-4936 Water Water Jul,1996 Cs-137 A 211.9 160.8- 263.0 220.2 i 20.2;29.9 l SPW-4936 Milk Jul,1996 Cs-134 A 135.2 104.4- 166.0 130.4 i 11.4;173 l SPMI-4938 Jul,1996 Cs-137 A 211.9 159.2 - 264.6 229.2 i 21.6;31.5 SPMI-4938 M11k Water Jul,1996 Fe-55 A 1.8 1.0 - 2.5 2.010.5;0.6 SPW-4942 Fish Jul,1996 Cs-137 A 0.1 0.1-0.1 0.l i 0.0;0.0 SPF-49%
Jul,1996 Gr. Beta A 7.8 63-93 7.0i 0.0;0.7 SPAP 5669 Air Filter A 51058.0 40958.4 - 61157.6 49589.0 1 589 5;4993.8 SPW-5700 Water Aug,1996 H-3 SPMI 7384 Milk Oct,1996 1-131 A 39.9 323 - 47.5 35.0 i 0.9:3.6 Milk Oct,1996 Cs-134 A 21.4 16.2 - 26.6 19.512.4;3.1 SPMI-7385 M11k Oct,1996 Cs-137 A 24.1 17.0 - 31.2 26.0 i 3.9;4.7 SPMl 7385 Mlik Oct,1996 I-131(g) A 114.1 89 3 - 138.9 1173 i 6.4;13.4 SPMI-7385 Oct,1996 I-131 A 79.9 56.1 - 103.7 64.5 i 14.4;15.8 SPMI 7444 M11k Water Oct,1996 I-131(g) A 79.9 53.7- 106.1 82.2 16.2;18.2 SPW-7444 Milk Oct,1996 I 131 A 199.7 156.0- 243.4 235.5 i 2.8;23.7 SPMI 7445 Water Oct,1996 I-131(g) A 199.7 156.0- 243.4 190.9 i 14.1;23.7 SPW-7445 M11k Oct,1996 I 131 A 114.1 92.2- 136.0 103.6 i 1.5;105 SPMl 7685 SPAP 2 Air Filter Oct,1996 Cr. Beta A 6.0 4.8 - 7.2 6.010.0;0.6 Soil Oct,1996 Cs 134 A 0.2 0.1 - 0.2 0.2 i o.0;0.0 SPSO-2478 Soll Oct,1996 Cs-137 A 0.4 03-0.5 0.510.0;0.1 SPSO-2478 l Charcoal Oct,1996 I 131(g) A 0.4 03-0.4 0.4 f D.0;0.0 SPCH 747 Canister Charcoal Oct,1996 I 131(g) A 0.5 0.4 - 0.6 0.5 i 0.0;0.1 SPCH-747 Canister SPAP-7476 Air Filter Oct,1996 Cs-137 A 1.9 1.5-23 2.110.0;0.2 42.417.2;8.4 I SPW-8734 Water Nov,1996 Co-60 A 43.0 30 3 - 55.7 SPW-8734 Water Nov,1996 Cs-134 A 30.1 19.9- 40 3 29.016.6;7.2 l Water Nov,1996 Cs-137 .A 31.5 18 3 - 44.7 35.1 i 9.5;10.1 SPW-8734 Water Nov,1996 H 3 A 25075.0 19992.4 - 30157.6 25383.5 i 433.5;2575.1 SPW-8740 V6
Tcble A 2. In-house" spike" samples. ,
Concentrationin pCi/L' Date Accepted Known TBEESML Results Lab Sample 2s, n=1' Cnde Type Collected Analysis Rejected Activity Control Limits"
- All results are in pCi/L, except for elemental potassium (K) data in milk, which are in mg/L.; air filter samples, which are in pCi/ filter; and food products, which are in uCi/kg.
- Control limits are based on the known value i 10%+1TU (where all parametric uncertainties, other than counting statistics, are less than 5%).
- All samples are the results of single determinations. The result is reported in the following format:
Activity
- Counting Error ; Total Propagated Uncertainty.
NOTE: For fish, Jello is used for the spike matrix. For vegetation, sawdust is used for the spike rnatrix.
s l
V-7
i 1 ,
! Table A-3. In-house" blank" samples.
i Concentration pCi/L'.
Teledyne Results Acceptance Sample Sample (4.66 Sigma) Criteria bb Activity * (4.66 Sigma)
Cnde Type Date Analysis LLD J
<0.02 0.02 1 0.13;0.13 < 1.0
. SPW-7 Water Jan1996 Ra-226
<0.02 0.01 i O.02;0.02 < 1.0 i SPW-2 Water Feb1996 Ra-226 Febl996 I 131(g) <2.7 -0.10 11.63;1.63 <9.6 SPCH-608 Charcoal Canister SPAP410 Air Filter Febl996 Co40 <4.1 3.46i339:3.41 < 10.0 l I
Air Filter Febl996 Cs 134 <3.6 -0.25 i 2.94;2.94 < 10.0 SPAP410 Febl996 Cs-137 <2.4 -0.31 i 2.53:2.53 < 10.0
- SPAP410 Air Filter Air Filter Feb 1996 Gr. Beta <0.4 03210.29;0.29 < 3.2 SPAP412 Water Febl996 Co40 <3.0 1.70 il.60;1.62 < 10.0 SPW-627 Water Febl996 Cs-134 <2.5 -0.36 i l.66;1.66 < 10.0 SPW-627 Water Febl996 Cs-137 <3.2 033 tl.60;1.60 < 10.0 SPW-627 Water Febl996 Gr. Alpha <1.0 0.20 1 0.93;0.93 <1.0 SPW-627 Water Febl996 Gr. Beta <3.2 2.26t !.76;1.80 <3.2
> SPW-627 Water Feb l996 I 131 <0.4 -0.21 f 032;032 < 0.5 SPW-627 Water Febl996 Co40 <2.6 -1.38 i 2.18;2.19 <10.0 SPW-628 Febl996 Cs-134 <3.1 0.95 i 2.11:2.11 < 10.0 SPW-628 Water ,
Water Febl996 Cs-137 <3.8 0.55i231;231 < 10.0 SPW-628
-0.181035;0.35 <0.5 l SPW-628 Water Feb l996 1131 <0.5 Water Febl996 H-3 <197 -12.47197.17;97.18 < 200.0 SPW-629 Milk Febl996 Co40 <3.5 1.26 11.79;1.80 < 10.0 SPMI430 Milk Febl996 Cs-134 <2.5 -0.12f t.53;1.53 < 10.0
. SPM1430 Milk Feb l996 Cs 137 <2.6 0.22 1 1.44;1.44 < 10.0 ]
SPM1430 Milk Feb l996 I-131 <0.3 -0.07 i 0.24;0.24 < 0.5 l SPMI430 Milk Febl996 Sr-89 <0.9 -0.20 i1.27;1.27 < 5.0 SPMI430 Milk Feb1996 Sr-90 N/A 1.48 i 0.40;0.42 <1.0
. SPM1430 Low level of Sr-90 concentration in milk (1-5 pCi/L) is not unusual.
Vegetation Feb l996 I131(g) <0.012 0.00 1 0.01:0.01 < 20.0 l SPVE 1069 Water Mar 1996 Ra-226 <0.08 -0.00 i 0.04:0.04 < 1.0 SPW-3 SPW 3 Water Mar 1996 Ra 228 <0.9 0.47f0.75;0.75 < 1.0 Water Apr1996 Ra-226 <0.06 0.09 i O.04;0.04 < 1.0 SPW-4 Milk Apr1996 Cs 134 <4.8 2.52 12.62;2.64 < 10.0 ;
SPMI 2218 i Milk Apr1996 Cs-137 <5.4 4.42 1 3.00;3.06 < 10.0 SPMI 2218 SPW-2220 Water Apr1996 Co40 <2.9 0.95 i l.58;1.59 < 10.0 Water Apr1996 Cs 134 <2.7 1.4711.64;1.65 < 10.0 SPW 2220 SPW 2220 Water Apr1996 Cs-137 <1.9 -1.28 t l.72;1.73 <10.0 l
Water Apr1996 Gr. Alpha <0.2 -0.21 1 0.97;0.97 < 1.0 SPW 2222 1
V- 8 i
. i
[
. Table A-3. In-house " blank" samples.
1 i
Concentration pCi/L*.
Teledyne Results Acceptance i Sample (4.66 Sigma) Criteria !
Lab Sample (4.66 Sigma)
Type Date Analysis LLD Activity * [
Code
<2.8 2.26 11.57;1.61 < 3.2 ,
SPW 2222 Water Apr 1996 Gr. Beta '
<151 -10130 1 70.18;71.52 < 200.0 SPW 2224 Water Apr1996 H-3
<1.4 0.22 1 0.84;0.84 < 1.5 SPW 2284 Water Apr 1996 I 129
<0.7 -0.07 i 0.43;0.43 < 1000.0
. SPW-2286 Water Apr1996 Fe-55
<4.2 0.55 i 2.29:2.29 < 10.0 SPW-2288 Water Apr1996 Tc-99
<0.010 0.00 i 0.01:0.01 < 10.0 S M -3421 Fish May1996 Co40
<0.014 -0.00 1 0.01:0.01 < 10.0
@F-3421 Fish May1996 Cs-134
<0.015 0.01 1 0.01:0.01 < 10.0 SPF-3421 Fish May1996 Cs 137
<0.1 0.04 1 0.20;0.20 < 0.5
, SPW-3440 Water May 19961131
<0.1 -0.07 i 0.20 0.20 <0.5 SPMI 3442 Milk May19961131
<1.0 0.73 i 1.05:1.06 < 1.0 SPW-6 Water Jun1996 Ra 228
<8.7 2.51 14.51;4.52 < 10.0 SPMI-4055 Milk Jun1996 Co40
<6.1 1.871337:338 < 10 0 SPMI-4055 Milk Jun1996 Cs-134
<5.3 1.82 i 11.80;11.80 < 10.0 SPMI-4055 Milk Jun1996 Cs-137
<0.3 0.21 1 0.24:0.24 <0.5 SPMI-4055 Milk Jun1996 I131
<0.8 0.57tl.83:1.83 < 5.0 SPMI-4055 Milk Jun1996 Sr-89 N/A 1.49 10.44;0.46 < 1.0 SPMI-4055 Milk Jun1996 Sr-90 law level of Sr-90 concentration in milk (15 pCi/L) is not unusual.
Ra 228 <0.8 -0.05 10.70;0.70 < 1.0 SPW-7 Water Jul1996
<2.7 1.26 t l.44;1.45 < 10.0 SPAP-4751 Air Filter Jul1996 Co40
<4.8 1.50 11.80;1.80 < 10.0 SPAP-4751 Air Filter Jul1996 Cs-134
<2.4 0.63 11.49;1.49 < 10.0 l SPAP-4751 Air Filter Jul1996 Cs-137
<4.5 -0.25 i3.27:3.27 < 10.0 I
SPW-4937 Water Jul1996 Co40
<5.5 0.341339:339 <10.0 SPW 4937 Water Ju!1996 Cs-134 Water <5.7 -03513.43;3.43 < 10.0 SPW-4937 Jul1996 Cs-137
<8.0 1.13 14.73;4.73 < 10.0 SPMI-4939 Milk Jul1996 Co-60
<7.2 1.80 15.18;5.19 < 10.0
, SPMI-4939 Milk Jul1996 Cs-134 Cs-137 <5.8 1.04 i 3.77:3.77 < 10.0 SPMI-4939 M11k Jul1996 Water Fe-55 <0.6 0.181035;035 < 1000.0 SPW-4943 Jul1996
<0.006 0.00 1 0.00:0.00 <10.0 SPF-4997 Fish Jul1996 Co40
<0.006 -0.00 10.01:0.01 < 10.0 SPF-4997 Fish Jul1996 Cs-134
<0.009 0.01 1 0.01:0.01 < 10.0 SPF-4997 Fish Jul1996 Cs-137 Air Filter <0.4 0.801032:033 <3.2 SPAP 5670 Jul1996 Cr. Beta Water Aug1996 Ra 226 <0.04 0.16 1 0.03:0.03 <1.0 SPW 8 Water Aug1996 Ra 228 <1.0 0.44 1 0.79;0.79 < 1.0 SPW 8 Watcr Sep1996 Ra 226 <0.05 0.01 1 0.03:0.03 <1.0 SPW-9 V- 9
4 Table A-3. In-house " blank" samples.
Concentration pCi/L*.
Teledyne Results Acceptance (4.66 Sigma) Criteria lab Sample Sample C4 Type Date Analysis LLD Activity * (4.66 Sigma)
SPW-7013 Water Sep 1996 Sr-89 <1.8 -0.73 11.10;1.10 <5.0 SPW-7013 Water Sep1996 Sr-90 <0.5 -0.05 i 0.21:0.21 < 1.0 SPW 10 Water Oct1996 Ra 228 <1.0 0.80 1 0.57:0.58 < 1.0 SPMI-7382 Milk Oct1996 Cs 134 <3.1 0.25 1 2.62;2.62 < 10.0 SPMI-7382 Milk Oct 1996 Cs-137 <4.8 0.15 1 2.68;2.68 < 10.0 SPMI 7382 Milk Oct 1996 I-131(g) <3.7 -1.61 i 3.28;3.29 < 20.0 SPMI-7383 Milk Oct1996 Cs-134 <5.7 0.28 1 3.68;3.68 < 10.0 SPMI 7383 Milk Oct 1996 Cs-137 <4.1 -1.83 1 3.63;3.64 < 10.0 SPMI-7383 Milk Oct 1996 I131 <0.4 0.18 1 0.23:0.24 <0.5 Milk Oct 1996 1-131(g) <6.8 1.19 14.08:4.08 < 20.0 SPMI 7383 SPMI 7443 Milk Oct 1996 l131 <0.4 -0.08 1 0.17;0.17 <0.5 SPCH-7475 Charcoal - Oct 1996 l 131(g) <2.8 -1.58 1 12.74;12.74 <9.6 Canister Air Filter Oct 1996 Cs 137 <2.2 0.00 1 0.00;0.00 < 10.0 SPAP-7477 Soll Oct 1996 Cs-134 <0.011 0.00 1 0.00;0.00 < 10.0 SPSO-7479 Soil Oct 1996 Cs-137 <0.007 0.00 i 0.00;0.00 < 10.0 SPSO-7479 SPAP 7527 Air Filter Oct 1996 Gr. Beta <0.7 0.10 1 0.45;0.45 <3.2 Fish Oct1996 Co40 <0.016 -0.00 1 0.01;0.01 < 10.0 SPF-7505 Fish Oct 1996 Cs-134 <0.017 -0.01 1 0.08:0.04 < 10.0 SPF 7505 Fish Oct1996 Cs-137 <0.016 -0.00 1 0.01:0.01 < 10.0 SPF 7505 SPW-8735 Water Novl996 Co40 <6.0 -0.14 i o.10;0.10 < 10.0 SPW 8735 Water Nov1996 Cs-134 <4.7 -0.53 i 7.69;7.69 < 10.0 Water Nov1996 Cs-137 <8.2 2.09 1 4.63;4.64 < 10.0 SPW 8735 SPW-8735 Water Nov1996 Gr. Alpha <0.3 0.15 1 0.21;0.21 < 1.0 SPW-8735 Water Nov 1996 Cr. Beta <0.8 -0.41 i 0.52;0.53 <3.2 SPW 8739 Water Nov l996 H-3 <158 104.99 i 82.93;84.15 < 200.0
- Liquid sample results are reported in pCi/ Liter, air filter sample results are in pCi/ filter, charcoal sample results are in pCi/ charcoal, and solid sample results are in pCi/ kilogram.
- 'Ihe activity reported is the net activity result.
V- 10
Ta5 le A-4. In-house "d uplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' ;
Date lab Accepted' F1-
- Second Cellected Analysis Codes
- Reje. ted Result Result :
CF - 20,21 A 7.110.2;0.8 6.9iO.1;0.7 Jan,1996 Cr. Beta CF- 20,21 A 3.710.4;0.5 3.710.1;0.4 ;
Jan,1996 K-40 '
CF - 20,21 A -0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0i0.0;0.0 Jan,1996 Sr-89 CF - 20,21 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 l Jan,1996 Sr-90 MI- 47,48 A -1.714.1;4.1 2.8i3.4;3.4 Jan,1996 Cs-137 Jan,1996 I-131 MI- 47,48 A 0.1i0.2;0.2 0.110.2:0.2 LW - 103,104 A 0311.7;1.7 1.1i2.2;2.2 Jan,1996 Co40 Jan,1996 Cs 134 LW - 103,104 A 0.411.5;1.5 1.012.4:2.4 Jan,1996 Cs-137 LW - 103,104 A 0.711.6;1.6 0312.2:2.2 !
LW - 103,104 A 2.210.5;0.6 2.210.6;0.7 ,
Jan,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 103,104 A 0.1 i0.2;0.2 0.110.3;0.3 l Jan,1996 1-131 LW - 103,104 A -3.9i63;63 1.4112.0;12.0 Jan,1996 1131(g)
LW - 103,104 A 78.6i 353;36.2 99.4 148.5;49.5 Jan,1996 K-40 CW - 132,133 A 1.7113:13 -0.311.1;1.1 ;
Jan,1996 G r. Beta CW - 132,133 A 5.5il.7;1.8 3.911.6;1.6 Jan,1996 Gr. Beta MI 70,71 A 1.2i43:4.3 1.714.1;4.1 Jan,1996 Co40 MI-70,71 A 0313.3;33 2.413.4;3.4 l Jan,1996 Cs-137 MI - 154,155 A 1.6i2.6:2.6 -0.513.3;3.3 j Jan,1996 Co-60 MI - 154,155 A 0.l i2.2;2.2 -2.312.6;2.6 i Jan,1996 Cs-134 MI- 154,155 A -0.7i 2.0:2.0 0.712.9;2.9 l Jan,1996 Cs-137 Mi- 154,155 A 0.0103;0.3 0.010.2;0.2 Jan,1996 1131 MI- 154,155 A 1.213.4;3.4 0.1i3.9;3.9 Jan,1996 I-131(g)
K-40 MI- 154,155 A 1,521.1 1 893;225 3 1,628.4 1122.0;252.8 Jan,1996 Jan,1996 Sr 89 MI- 154,155 A -0.5 i 0.8;0.8 -0.710.8;0.8 Jan,1996 Sr90 Mi- 154,155 A 0.8103;0.3 1.0iO3:03 Jan,1996 1-131 WW - 180,181 A 0.010.2:0.2 -0.110.2:0.2 I131 MI- 298,299 A 0.110.2;0.2 0.210.3;0.3 Jin,1996 J*n,1996 K-40 Mi - 298,299 A 1,579.0 1 177.0;2783 1,551.7 1168.0;269.7 Jan,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 355,356 A 0.111.0;1.0 -0310.9;0.9 Jan,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 355,356 A 2.4113;1.3 2.lil.3;1.3 Jan,19% Co40 SW 436,437 A 0.1 f t.1;1.1 0.711.9;1.9 Jan,1996 Cs-137 SW - 436,437 A 0.111.2:1.2 1.611.9;1.9 Jan,1996 H-3 WW - 500,501 A 21,035.6 1 418.5;2,144.8 20,597.1 1414.4;2,101.0 Jan,1996 Gr. Beta SWT - 554,555 A 2.910.5;0.7 3.110.5;0.7 SW - 841,842 A- 65.0 i283;29.0 118.9 157.7;58.9 Jan,1996 K-40 Feb,1996 Cr. Beta SW - 479,480 A 6.711.0;1.4 7.8 f l.3;1.8 Feb,1996 Co40 MI- 521,522 A -1.112.9;2.9 0.1 i5.0;5.0 Feb,1996 Cs-137 MI- 521,522 A -0.8 i 2.8;2.8 -0.413.4;3.4 V - 11 l
. )
Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Date lab Accepted' First Second Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result Feb,1996 I-131 MI - 521,522 A 0.1103;0.3 0.210.3;0.3 Feb,1996 Co-60 MI- 580,581 A -0.812.7;2.7 1.711.5;1.5 Feb,1996 Cs-137 MI- 580,581 A 0.6*23;23 0.4
- 1.3;1.3 Feb,1996 Cr. Alpha LW - 709,710 A 0.110.4;0.4 0.510.4;0.4 Feb,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 709,710 A 1.710.4;0.5 2.010.4;0.5 Feb,1996 H-3 LW - 709,710 A 37.41743;74.5 84.4176.4;773 Feb,1996 I131 MI-603,604 A -0.910.4 0.4 0.210.3:0.3 Feb,1996 K-40 Mi- 603,604 A 1,382.9 1 115.0;220.4 1,3353 1175.0;252.2 Feb,1996 I131 WW - 648,649 A -0.1103;0.3 -0.110.3;03 Feb,1996 I131 MI 674,675 A -0.810.4;0.4 -0.110.4;0.4 Feb,1996 K-40 MI - 674,675 A 1,390.4 1 174.0;257.0 1,493.61166.0;2623 Feb,1996 1131 WW - 865,866 A 0.110.2;0.2 0.110.2;0.2 Feb,1996 Co-60 PW - 932,933 A 0.5 i1.5;1.5 0.412.4:2.4 Feb,1996 Cs-137 PW - 932,933 A 0.111.7;1.7 0.713.0;3.0 Feb,1996 Co-60 SW - 911,912 A -1.8133;3.3 1.011.5;1.5 Feb,1996 Cs 137 SW - 911,912 A -0.313.6;3.6 -0.9 i t .8;1.8 Feb,1996 Gr. Deta SWT - 953,954 A 2.510.5;0.7 2.210.5;0.6 Feb,1996 Cr.Deta LW - 1037,1038 A 2.810.5;0.7 3.110.5;0.7 Feb,1996 H3 LW - 1037,1038 A 36.5 194.7;94.9 116.8198.0;993 Mar,1996 Cr. Beta CW - 977,978 A 0.711.2;1.2 -0.111.0;1.0 Mar,1996 Cr. Deta CW - 977,978 A 3.9i1.6;1.6 3.111.5;1.5 Mar,1996 H-3 SW - 1467,1468 A 1303 1 81.1;83.1 1303 1 81.1;83.1 Mar,1996 Sr 89 SW - 1467,1468 A -0.112.0;2.0 -1.l i l .9; 1.9 Mar,1996 Sr90 SW - 1467,1468 A 0.6103;0.3 0.910.3;0.4 Mar,1996 I-131 MI- 1058,1059 A -0310.4;0.4 -0.0 i0.4;0.4 Mar,1996 K-40 Mi- 1058,1059 A 1,500.0 1 157.0;257.4 1,549.0 1156.0;262.1 Mar,1996 Sr-89 Mi- 1058,1059 A 0.610.9:0.9 -1.5113;1.3 Mar,1996 Sr-90 MI- 1058,1059 A 1.510.4;0.4 2.410.5;0.6 Mar,1996 1131 M1 - 1152,1153 A 0.410.6;0.6 0.210.6;0.6 Mar,1996 K-40 MI- 1152,1153 A 1,524 3 1157.0;260.0 1,358.8 1172.0;252.5 Mar,1996 H3 P - 1175,1176 A 160.8 i 82.5;85 3 151.8 182.1;84.6 Mar,1996 Cr. Beta LW - 1213,1214 A 2310.6;0.7 2.710.6;0.7 Mar,1996 H3 LW - 1213,1214 A 92.4 1 97.1;98.0 29.5 194.6;94.7 Mar,1996 H3 SW - 1282,1283 A 82.4 1 96.2;96.9 36.9194.4;94.5 Mar,1996 Co-60 LW - 1309,1310 A 3.014.7;4.7 4.l i 2.5;2.6 Mar,1996 Cs-134 LW - 1309,1310 A -0.213.6;3.6 2.214.4;4.4 Mar,1996 Cs-137 LW 1309,1310 A -4.813.9:4.0 -1.114.2;4.2 Mar,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 1309,1310 A 2.610.5;0.7 2.910.5;0.7 V - 12 l
[
L i
taw A-4. In-house " duplicate" mumam. ,
t Concentrationin pCi/L' ;
I.ab Accepted' First Second {
Date Result j Cellected Analysis - f' art ==* Rejected Result A 0.410.5;0.5 0.110.5;0.5 [
Mar,1996 1-131 LW -1309,1310 LW - 1309,1310 A 1.015.5:5.5 -0.7153;53 l Mar,1996 I-131(g) 104J151J;52.8 85.6 i S6.5;57.1 !
LW - 1309,1310 A Mar,1996 . K-40 162.9199.9;1323 108.0197.7;98.8 -
Mar,1996 H3 LW - 1362,1363 A l LW - 1362,1363 A -1.010.9;0.9 03 tl.4;1.4 !
Mar,1996 Sr 89 A 0.7i03:0.3 0.010.5;0.5 l Mar,1996 Sr-90 LW -1362,1363 0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 !
Mar,1996 ' Co40 F - 1446,1447 A 0.010.0;0.0 !
Mar,1996 Cs 134 F - 1446,1447 A 0.010.0;0.0 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Mar,1996 Cs-137 F- 1446,1447 A 2.010.1:0.2 1.810.1;0.2 l Mar,1996 Gr. Beta F - 1446,1447 A -0.1 i0.4;0.4 -0.710.5;0.6 Mar,1996 1-131(g) F -1446,1447 F -1446,1447 A 2.0103;0.4 2.0f 0.4:0.4 :
Mar,1996 K-40 141.6 1 %.7;97.8 175.2 1 98.1;99.6 [
Mar,1996 H-3 SW - 1537,1538 A 0.7i t.6;1.6 i LW - 1612,1613 A 3.513.1;3.1 Mar,1996 Co40 LW -1612,1613 A 1.412.7;2.7 1.612.0;2.0 ,
Mar,1996 Cs134 Mar,1906 Cs 137 LW 1612,1613 A 4J13.0;3.1 13i2.4:2.4 {
LW -1612,1613 A 2.610.5;0.7 3.010.5;0.7 l Mar,1996 Gr. Beta .
LW - 1612,1613 A 0310.2;0.2 0.110.1;0.1 l Mar,1996 I131 LW - 1612,1613 A 03i33;3.7 0.7i2.9;2.9 l Mar,1996 I 131(g)
LW - 1612,1613 A 61.2 i33.1;33.7 983 i 31.4;32.9 ;
Mar,1996 K-40 CW - 1709,1710 A 4.511.7:1.8 3.611.7;1.7 Mar,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 1709,1710 A 0.411.5;1.5 0311.5;1.5 i Mar,1996 Gr. Beta AP - 2140,2141 A 0.010.0;0.0 -0.0i0.0;0.0 i Mar,1996 Sr-89 AP - 2140,2141 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0i0.0;0.0 Mar,1996 Sr 90 WW - 1659,1660 A 0.2i3.2:3.2 2.2i2.5;2.5 Mar,1996 Co40 WW - 1659,1660 A -1.913.3;3.3 23i2.4;2.5 Mar,1996 Cs-137 A 995.8 1117.5;154.0 1,1153 i121.1;164.6 Mar,1996 H3 WW - 1659,1660 '
PW - 1757,1758 A 88.61119.7;120 3 68.9 1119.1;119.4 Mar,1996 H-3 AP -2547,2548 A 0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 i Mar.1996 Co40 AP - 2547,2548 A -0.010.0;0.0 0.0f 0.0;0.0 Mar,1996 Cs-137 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.0i0.0;0.0 Mar,1996 Co40 AP - 2568,2569 AP - 2568,2569 A -0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 Mer,1996 . Cs-137 Apr,1996 1-131 MI- 1778,1779 A 0.210.2:0.2 0.10.2:0.2 MI- 1778,1779 A 1,390.4 198.1;213.0 1,426.0 i144.0;241.6 Apr,1996 K-40 M1 - 1778,1779 A -3.112.1;2.2 -1.412.0;2.0 Apr,1996 Sr-89 MI- 1778,1779 A 2.210.5;0.6 2.010.4;0.5 Apr,1996 Sr 90 MI- 1799,1800 A 0.212.7:2.7 1.914.6;4.6 Apr,1996. - Co40 MI- 1799,1800 A 2.112.4:2.4 1.8i3.2;3.2 Apr,1996 Cs-137 V - 13
Table A.4. In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentrationin pCi/L' Date Lab Accepted' First Semnd Collected Analysis Cnd=* Rejected Result Result MI- 1799,1800 A 0.110.2:0.2 0.110.2;0.2 Apr,1996 I131 I131 MI- 1843,1844 A 0.010.2;0.2 0.1i0.2;0.2 Apr,1996 MI-1843,1844 A 1,429.1 i 93.2;215.5 1,6303 i143.0:263.8 Apr,1996 K-40 LW - 1913,1914 A 2.210.8;0.9 1.213.2;3.2 Apr,1996 Co-60 _
LW - 1913,1914 A 0.410.8 0.8 -0.8 i3.1;3.1 Apr,1996 Cs-134 LW 1913,1914 A 0.510.9;0.9 0.5i3.1;3.1 Apr,1996 Cs-137 Apr,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 1913,1914 A 3.010.5;0.7 2.710.5:0.7 Apr,1996 I131 LW - 1913,1914 A 0.110.2;0.2 0.1103:0.3 Apr,1996 I131(g) LW - 1913,1914 A -0.211.7;1.7 -1.715.4:5.4 K-40 LW - 1913,1914 A 39.4 117.4;17.8 86.9143.4;443 Apr,1996 S O - 1946,1947 A 0.2i0.0;0.0 0.210.0;0.0 Apr,1996 Cs-137 S O -1946,1947 A 10.510.5;1.2 10.5i0.4;1.1 Apr,1996 K-40 Apr,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 1991,1992 A 3.911.7;1.8 4.6i t.7:1.9 Apr,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 1991,1992 A -0.311.4;1.4 03tl.5;1.5 WW - 1890,1891 A 1.6it.8;1.8 0.2 i2.2;2.2 Apr,1996 Co40 WW - 1890,1891 A -0.6i 1.7;1.7 0.112.5;2.5 Apr,1996 Cs 137 WW 1890,1891 A 538.2 i 97.1;121.6 601.3 f 99.4;128.7 Apr,1996 H3 WW - 2063,2064 A 6310.8:1.2 6310.8;13 Apr,1996 Gr. Beta WW - 2063,2064 A 69.5 i 78.1;78.7 26.8176.2;763 Apr,1996 H-3 MI- 2089,2090 A 0.210.3:03 0.210.2;0.2 Apr,1996 1-131 MI- 2089,2090 A 1,3383 i 180.0;256.0 1,456.5 1160.0;254.6 Apr,1996 K LW - 2303,2304 A 1.9i3.0:3.0 1.513.0;3.0 Apr,1996 -Co40 LW - 2303,2304 A 0.812.7;2.7 1.013.0;3.0 Apr,1996 Cs 137 LW - 2303,2304 A 3.7113;1.4 4.111.3;1.4 Apr,1996 Gr. Beta Apr,1996 1131 MI- 2418,2419 A 0.2 1 0.4 0.4 0.2 iO3:0.3 Mi- 2418,2419 A 1,418.9 1120.0;227.2 1,4773 1182.0;271.1 Apr,1996 K-40 SS - 2442,2443 A 3.6i3.9;3.9 0312.7;2.7 Apr,1996 Gr, Alpha SS - 2442,2443 A 5.513.1;3.1 8.613.3;3.4 Apr,1996 Gr. Beta Apr,1996 K 40 SS - 2442,2443 A 7.510.2:0.8 7.8103:0.8 SS - 2442,2443 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Apr,1996 Sr-90 SL- 2589,2590 A 0.110.0;0.0 0.110.0;0.0 Apr,1996 Cs 137 K-40 SL - 2589,2590 A 4.110.5;0.6 3310.5;0.6 Apr,1996 WW 2700,2701 13.9 173.4;73.4 -31.2 1 72.6;72.7 Apr,1996 H3 A Co40 SW - 2675,2676 A -1.911.9;1.9 -1.212.9;2.9 Apr,1996 Apr,1996 Cs 137 SW - 2675,2676 A -1.0i2.2;2.2 3.012.6:2.6 Apr,1996 K-40 SW - 2503,2504 A 95.9147.8 48.8 71.0 1 36.8:37.5 Co40 LW - 2777,2778 A 3.113.7;3.7 1.912.8;2.8 Apr,1996 LW 2777,2778 A -1.1
- 2.5;2.5 -1.5f 2.5;2.5 Apr,1996 Cs-134 i
V - 14 l
I
, ~_, _ _ . - . ~ . . ,- . - , - - . . - _ _ -
T*': A-4 ' In-house " duplicate" program.
Conuatration in pCi/L'
' Lab Accepted' First Second Date -
Result Result CelixW Analysis Codes
- Rejected LW -2777,2778 A 0.4133;3.3 2.5i3.1;3.2
- Apr,1996 ; Cs 137 LW - 2777,2778 A 2.710.6;0.8 2.210.6;0.7 Apr,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 2777,2778 A 0.2i0.3;0.3 -0.110.4;0.4 Apr,1996 I-131 LW - 2777,2778 A 2.11103;103 -1.8111.5;11.5 Apr,1996 1-131(g)
LW - 2777,2778 A 91.1 143.2;44.1 59.7i37.0;37.5 Apr,1996 - K-40 F -2612,2613 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1996 Co40 F - 2612,2613 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1996 Cs-137 BS - 2654,2655 A 4.7tl.8;1.8 6.0il.9;2.0 May,1996 Gr. Beta BS - 2654,2655 A 6.410.4;0.8 6.7i0.4;0.8 May,1996 K-40 BS - 2654,2655 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0io.0;0.0 W y,1996 Sr 89 BS - 2654,2655 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1996 Sr 90 F -2633,2634 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1996 Co40 F- 2633,2634 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.0i0.0;0.0 May,1996 Cs 137 MI- 2742,2743 A -1.613.2;3.2 0.212.7;2.7 May,1996 Co40
. MI- 2742,2743 A 0.7i2.6;2.6 -0.5123;2.3 May,1996 Cs-137 MI- 2742,2743 A -0.0io.2;0.2 0.2i0.3;0.3 May,1996 I-131 MI- 2841,2842 A 2.1i33;3.4 0.5i3.6;3.6 May,1996 Co40 MI 2841,2842 A 0.412.8;2.8 3313.4;3.4 May,1996 Cs-137 Mi- 2841,2842 A 0.4103:03 -0.010.2;0.2 May,1996 I131 WW - 2866,2867 A 6.9 t l.3;1.7 6.911.3;1.7 May,1996 Gr. Beta A 1783 1 87.5;90.8 133.8 i 85.6;87.5 May,1996 H3 WW - 2866,2867 LW - 2981,2982 A 1.9i2.5;2.5 0.8 i2.0;2.0 May,1996 Co40 LW - 2981,2982 A 0.812.4;2.4 0.212.0;2.0 May,1996 Cs-134 LW -2981,2982 A 2.212.7;2.7 -0.8i2.2;2.2 May,1996 Cs-137 LW -2981,2982 A 3.7i0.6;0.8 2.6i0.6;0.7 May,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 2981,2982 A -0.010.2;0.2 0.110.2;0.2 May,1996 I-131 LW - 2981,2982 A 1.9i 8.9;8.9 -3.0i7.3;7.3 May,1996 I 131(g)
LW - 2981,2982 A 121.01 38.6;40.5 150.7 i 233;27.7 May,1996 K-40 May,1996 Co40 F - 2887,2888 A 0.0t0.0;0.0 -0.00.0;0.0 F - 2887,2888 A -0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 May,1996 Cs-137 WW - 3032,3033 A 3.610.9;1.0 2.510.5;0.7 May,1996 Gr. Beta A 32.01 83.9;84.0 133.6 i 88.2;90.1 May,1996 H3 WW - 3032,3(B3 SS - 2931, 2932 A 0.210.1;0.1 0.110.0;0.0 May,1996 Cs 137 SS - 2931, 2932 A 21.4 i t.8;2.8 18.911.0;2.1 May,1996 K-40 CW 2955,2956 A 2.611.6;1.6 3.611.6;1.7 May,1996 Gr. Beta May,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 295".,, 2956 A -0.3il.1:1.1 -0.411.1:1.1 MI- 3053,3054 A 0.611.5;1.5 -0.612.0;2.0 May,1996 Sr May,1996 Sr-90 MI-3053,3054 A 1.410.4:0.4 1.910.5:0.6 V - 15
I Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' l l
Date Lab Accepted
- First Second j Collected Analysis Codes
- Rejected Result Result i M1- 3099,3100 ^ 0312.7;2.7 0314.3;4.3 May,1996 Co40 ..
MI- 3099,3100 A -0.6 i 2.5;2.5 -0.8 i3.6;3.6 May,1996 Cs 137 I-131 M1 - 3099,3100 A 0.0i0.3;03 0.210.2:0.2 May,1996 May,1996 K-40 F - 3251,3252 A 2.610.4;0.5 2.7103:0.4 BS - 3230,3231 A 0.610.0;0.1 0.610.0;0.1 May,1996 Cs 137 BS - 3230,3231 A 22.410.8;2.4 21.810.8;2.3 May,1996 K-40 M1 - 3344,3345 A 0.210.2 0.2 0.2103;0.3 May,1996 I-131 MI- 3344,3345 A 1,611.2 1 190.0;290.0 1,409.5 1157.0;247.8 May,1996 K-40 VE - 3381,3382 A 0.410.2;0.2 0.4 i0.2:0.2 May,1996Gr. Alpha VE 3381,3382 A 43i0.2;0.5 4.010.2:0.5 May,1996 Gr. Beta K-40 VE 3381,3382 A 4.6i03;0.5 4.1103:0.5 May,1996 SWU - 3404,3405 A 2.5 i 0.5;0.7 . 3.110.6;0.7 May,1996 Gr. Deta SWU - 3404,3405 A 197.6 i 88.5;92.5 188.4 i 88.1;91.7 May,1996 11 3 SW - 3677,3678 A 0.512.4;2.4 0.211.8;1.8 May,1996 Co40 SW - 3677,3678 A 1.213.4;3.4 -0.7 i 2.2;2.2 May,1996 Cs-137 SW - 3677,3678 A 5.4i13;1.5 6.011.3;1.6 l May,1996 Gr. Beta DW - 3551,3552 A 2.810.5;0.7 1.910.5;0.6 May,1996 Gr. Beta DW - 3551,3552 A 0310.4;0.4 0.010.4;0.4 May,1996 I-131 DW - 3551,3552 A 113.1 147.8;49.1 131.5 i 74.9;76.0 l May,1996 K-40 WW - 3506,3507 A 3.1 i 81.2;81.2 -32.2 179.6;79.7 i May,1996 11-3 PW - 3700,3701 A 0.9 i2.2;2.2 -0.413.1;3.1 May,1996 Co40 PW - 3700,3701 A -1.712.5;2.5 03 3.2;3.2 May,1996 Cs-137 M1 - 3447,3448 A 0.614.9;4.9 -1.314.8;4.8 Jun,1996 Co-60 M1 - 3447,3448 A 0.8i3.6;3.6 2.613.9;3.9 Jun,1996 Cs 137 Jun,1996 1131 M1 - 3447,3448 A -0.010.1;0.1 -0.110.3:0.3 G 3530,3531 A 4.810.1:0.5 4.910.1;0.5 !
Jun,1996 Gr. Deta C 3530,3531 A 4.910.5;0.7 4.510.4;0.6 l Jun,1996 K-40 G -3530,3531 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1996 Sr-89 Sr90 G 3530,3531 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.00.0;0.0 Jun,1996 W W 597,3598 A 2.710.7;0.8 1.710.7;0.7 Jun,1996 Gr. Deta Jun,1996 11-3 WW - 3597,3598 A 114.9 1 80.8;823 107.9 1 80.5:81.8 Jun,1996 K-40 G - 3621,3622 A 5.510.2;0.6 5.70.2;0.6 MI 3642,3643 A -0.210.3;03 0.210.3;03 Jun,1996 1131 F - 4452,4453 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1996 Cs-137 F - 4452,4453 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jun,1996 Co-137 F 4452,4453 A 2.110.1;0.2 2.110.1;0.2 Jun,1996 Gr. Deta Jun,1996 Gr. Beta F - 4452,4453 A 2.110.1:0.2 2.1i0.1:0.2 F -4452,4453 A 1.910.1:0.2 2.010.1;0.2 Jun,1996 K-40 V - 16
Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program.
- Concentrationin pCi/L' tab Accepted' First Second Date Codes" Rejected Result Result
- Collected Analysis _
Jun,1996 K-40 F - 4452,4453 A 1.9i0.1;0.2 2.0i0.1:0.2 MI 3830,3831 A 0.010.5;0.5 0.2i0.5;0.5 I Jun,1996 1-131 MI- 3830,3831 A 1,544.7 1 111.0;237.6 1,447.1 i159.0;253.0 Jun,1996 K-40 MI 3773,3774 A 1313.0;3.0 2.513.2;3.2 Jurt1996 Co40 MI- 3773,3774 A 3.812.6;2.7 -0.3 i2.6;2.6 j Jurt1996 Cs 137 '
MI- 3773,3774 A 0.210.3;03 -0.110.5;0.5 4
Jurt1996 1-131 Jun,1996 Sr-89 M1- 3874,3875 A -2.111.9;1.9 -13il.9;1.9 ,
MI- 3874,3875 A 23i0.6;0.6 2.410.6;0.6 Jun,1996 Sr-90 G -3918,3919 A 6.710.2;0.7 7.110.3;0.8 i
Jurt1996 K-40 Jun,1996 K-40 C - 4045,4046 A 4.710.5;0.7 , 5.1103:0.6 ,
SWU - 4092,4093 A 2.4 i0.7;0.8 1.9i0.6;0.7 l Jurt1996 Gr. Beta SWU - 4092,4093 A 208.01 84.8;89.4 224.0 185.4;90.7 Jun,1996 H-3 MI- 4071,4072 A -0.1166;0.6 -0.1 i0.5;0.5 :
4 Jurt1996 I-131 '
MI - 4071,4072 A 1,2293 1142.0;219.4 1,512.1 1143.0;250.5 Jun,1996 K-40 MI- 4071,4072 A 0311.0;1.0 -0.411.2;1.2-Jun,1996 Sr-89 MI- 4071,4072 A 1.010.3;0.3 1310.4;0.4 Jun,1996 Sr-90 W W 4113,4114 A 0.110.5;0.5 03i0.5;0.5 Jurt1996 1131 SW - 4162,4163 A 13.4 175.4;75.4 6.2 i75.0;75.1 i Jun,1996 H3 ;
A 58.4 i 80.8;81.2 1043 179.1;80.4
- Jurt1996 H3 PW - 4215,4216 LW - 4259,4260 A 195.8 186.1;90.2 215 3 i 86.9;91.7 Jun,1996 H-3 '
PW - 4549,4550 A 0.511.4;1.4 -0.4 i t.5;1.5 Jun,1996 Co-60 Jun,1996 Cs-137 PW - 4549,4550 A -1.111.7;1.7 -0.7 i2.0:2.0 SW - 4406,4407 A -0.912.0;2.0 -0.3 i 2.6;2.6 Jurt1996 Co40 SW - 4406,4407 A -0.412.4;2.4 2.612.9;3.0 Jurt If" . Cs 137 E - 4284,4285 A 1.010.1;0.1 1.110.1;0.1
> Jul,1996 C r. Beta Jul,1996 K-40 E - 4284,4285 A 1.1 i0.2:0.2 1.210.1:0.2 Jul,1996 E - 4284,4285 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.0io.0;0.0 Sr-89 E - 4284,4285 A -0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Jul,1996 Sr-90 Jul,1996 Gr. Beta WW - 4305,4306 A 1.210.3;0.4 1.2103:0.4 MI- 4326,4327 A -0.2 i3.0;3.0 -1.1 i 3.4;3.4 Jul,1996 Co-60 MI- 4326,4327 A -0.l i2.6;2.6 2.013.0;3.0 Jul,1996 Cs-137 P - 4431,4432 A 24.8 1 71.9;72.0 111.0 175.7;77.2 Jul,1996 H-3 Jul,1996 Sr89 AP - 4595,45% A 0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 i AP - 4595,45% A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0
- Jul,1996 Sr 90 Co40 WW - 4375,4376 A 1312.1;2.1 1.212.4;2.4 Jul,1996 Jul,1996 Cs-137 WW - 4375,4376 A 1.112.3:2.3 1.012.9;2.9 WW - 4375,4376 A -30.8 1 76.9;77.0 -25.4 1 77.2;77.2 Jut,1996 H-3 1131 MI- 4503,4504 A -0.0103;0.3 0.210.3;0.3
, Jul,1996 f
V - 17 i
.' i l
Table A.4. In-house " duplicate" program.
1 Concentration in pCl/L' ;
lab Accepted' First Second Date' Collected Analysis Cad ==* Rejected Result Result MI- 4503,4504 A 1,287.1 1 161.0:237.8 1,188 3 1136.0;211.2 Jul,1996 K-40 MI- 4503,4504 A -1.511.0;1.0 -1.811.2;1.2 j Jul,1996 Sr-89 MI- 4503,4504 A 1.6i0.5;0.5 2.510.5;0.6 i Jul,1996 Sr 90 MI- 4527,4528 A 2.412.5;2.6 1.2i2.6;2.6 1 Jul,1996 Co40 MI- 4527,4528 A U.811.9;1.9 1.912.6;2.6 Jul,1996 Cs 134 MI 4527,4528 A -0.712.0;2.0 0.112.3;23 Jul,1996 Cs-137 MI- 4527,4528 A 0.2 i0.5;0.5 0.1i0.5;0.5 Jul,1996 1-131
' MI 4527,4528 A -0.112.8;2.8 0.113.6;3.6 l Jul,1996 1-131(g)
MI 4527,4528 A 1,419.1 191.3;213.5 1,408.6 1107.0;219.4 Jul,1996 K-40 MI 4527,4528 A -0.4 i1.0; 1.0 -1.5 i t.1;1.2 Jul,1996 Sr-89 MI 4527,4528 A 1.110.2;0.3 1310.3;0.3 Jul,1996 Sr90 WW - 4684,4685 A -30.7 i 76.8;76.9 -13.0 177.6;77.7
- Jul,1996 H3 WW - 4808,4809 A 1.0113;1.3 0.911.2;1.3
- Jul,1996 Gr. Beta W W 4808,4809 A -15.0182.4
- 82.4 -30.4 i 72.8;72.9
! Jul,1996 H3 G-4762,4763 A 7.010.3;0.8 7310. ;u.o
, Jul,1996 K-40
' LW - 4832,4833 A -1.211.7;1.7 1.2 i t.9;1.9 Jul,1996 Co-60 LW 4832,4833 A 1.0il.6;1.6 1.7i2.2;2.3 Jul,1996 Cs-137 LW - 4832,4833 A 3.510.7;0.9 3.410.7;0.9 Jul,1996 Gr. Beta
' LW - 4832,4833 A 3.510.7;0.9 3.410.7;0.9 Jul,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 5014,5015 A 2.0i0.6;0.7 2.0i0.6;0.7 Jul,1996 Gr. Beta F - 5515,5516 A 0.110.0;0.0 0.110.0;0.0
- Jul,1996 Cs-137 F - 5515,5516 A 2.510.1;0.3 2.510.1;0.3 Jul,1996 Gr. Beta F - 5515,5516 A 2.4103:0.4 2.710.4;0.4 Jul,1996 K-40 CW - 4956,4957 A 2.211.5;1.5 4.011.6;1.7 7
Jul,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 4956,4957 A 0.611.2;1.2 0310.9;0.9
)ul,1996 Gr. Beta SW - 5248,5249 A -1.011.9:1.9 0.211.9;1.9 Jul,1996 Co40 4
Jul,1996 Cs-137 SW - 5248,5249 A 0.812.3;2.3 -0.612.4:2.4 WW - 5215,5216 A 183.4 191.0;943 317.9 196.0;1053 l
Jul,1996 H-3 MI- 5081,5082 A 1.213.1:3.1 -1.7i4.2;4.2 Jul,1996 Co.60 l 0.512.6;2.6 -2.913.3;3.4
- Jul,1996 Cs 137 MI- 5081,5082 A M1- 5081,5082 A 0.210.6;0.6 0.510.7;0.7 Jul,1996 I131
' MI- 5081,5082 A 0.210.6;0.6 0.410.7;0.7 Jul,1996 1-131 SWU - 5125,5126 A 4.112.1:2.2 5.512.3;2.5 Jul,1996 Gr. Beta SWU - 5125,5126 A 176.4 1 90.7;93.8 125.7 188.7;90.4 Jul,1996 H-3 Jul,1996 Gr. Beta VE - 5146,5147 A 3.110.1;0.3 3.110.1 0.3 Jul,1996 K-40 VE - 5146,5147 A 3.410.1:0.4 3.5 A0.1:0.4 l DW - 5269,5270 A 6.Sil.4;1.7 6.011.3;1.6 l Jul,1996 Gr. Beta l Jul,1996 I-131 DW - 5269,5270 A 0.2i0.4;0.4 0.0i0.3:0.3 1
V - 18 i
i
V .;
i Table A-4, in-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' l I
lab Accepted' First- Second Date Collected Analysis Cadd Rek<ted Result Result MI- 5168,5169 A -0.0f 0.4;0.4 -0.610.5;0.5 i Aug,1996 I131 l MI- 5168,5169 A 1,585.8 1 123 4;248 3 1,534.4 1162.0;264.2
- Aug,1996 K-40 l Aug,1996 1131 MI- 5289,5290 A -0.1 i0.5;0.5 --03 i0.6;0.6 j MI- 5190,5191 A -1.6 i2.8;2.8 -0.2 i4.0;4.0 l Aug,1996 Co40 MI- 5190,5191 A 0.2 i3.1
- 3.1 0.6i3.4;3.4 : )
Aug,1996 Cs 137 MI- 5190,5191 A 0.2i0.5;0.5 0.410.5;0.5 .
Aug,1996 1131 SL - 5424,5425 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0
,l Aug,1996 Co40 SL - 5424,5425 A 0.0 t 0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Aug,1996 C3-134 SL - 5424,5425 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0
Aug,1996 K-40 SL - 5424,5425 A 1.610.3;03 1.610.2:0.3 MI- 5386,5387 A 0.8i3.2;3.2 3.4 i4.8;4.9 ,
2 Aug,1996 Co40 Mi- 5386,5387 A 1.li 2.6;2.6 1.813.5;3.5 I
Aug,1996 Cs 137 Aug,1996 1-131 MI 5386,5387 A 0.010.2;0.2 -0.0i0.20.2 l MI- 5386,5387 A 0.010.2;0.2 -0.010.3;03 Aug,1996 I131 ,
SWU - 5905,5906 A 1.5
- 0.7;0.7 2.410.5;0.6 i
! Aug,1996 Gr. Beta A 257.21843;913 306.6 i 86 3;95.8 Aug,1996 H3 SWU - 5905,5906 MI- 5582,5583 A 0.210.6;0.6 0.0i0.6;0.6
' Aug,1996 1131 MI- 5582,5583 A 1,473.6 1180.0;269.4 1,459.0 1152.0;250.0 K-40
, Aug,1996 LW - 5606,5607 A 0.7it.8;1.8 -0.8 i t.5;1.5 I Aug,1996 Co40 LW - 5606,5607 A 0.511.9;1.9 -0.912.6;2.6 Aug,1996 Cs 137 ,
4 Aug,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 5606,5607 A 5.4i1.3;1.5 53i1.3;1.5 SL - 5667,5668 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Aug,1996 Cs 137 ,
SL- 5667,5668 A 2.410.3;0.4 2.710.3;0.4 Aug,1996 K-40 CW - 5759,5760 A 3.7 t l.5;1.6 4.6 t l.5;1.7 :
Aug,1996 Gr. Beta
- 0.711.1;1.1 Aug,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 5759,5760 A 0.711.1;1.1 2
Aug,1996 Co40 MI- 5817,5818 A -4314.6;4.6 3.714.8:4.8 ,
MI 5817,5818 A -0.7i 4.2:4.2 1.4 i3.6;3.6 l Aug,1996 Cs 137 MI- 5817,5818 A 0.010.1;0.1 0.110.1;0.1 ;
Aug,1996 1131 SWT - 5884,5885 A 2.710.8;0.9 2.910.7;0.8 Aug,1996 Gr. Beta SW - 5925,5926 A 3.6i0.6;0.8 3.810.9;1.1 i
- Aug,1996 Gr. Beta MI- 5978,5979 A -0.110.5;0.5 0.4 i0.4;0.4 i Aug,1996 1-131 K-40 MI- 5978,5979 A 1,468.4 1179.0;268.2 1,560.8 i l73.0;273.8 Aug,1996 Co40 VE - 5950,5951 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 ;
Aug,1996 VE - 5950,5951 A -0.0i 0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Aug,1996 Cs-137 ,
Sep,1996 Gr. Beta VE 6031,6G)2 A 2.910.1;0.3 2.7i0.2:0.3 !
K-40 VE 6031,6032 A 3.210.2;0.4 3.410.3;0.5 Sep,1996 Sr89 VE - 6031,6032 A 0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 1
V - 19 i
I
. . _ . _ , _ , , . _ , , ,9
~ _ _ _ _ -_ _ ._ ._ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . . . . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _
i ;
Table A-4. In-house "duplicaV program.
- Concentrationin pCi/L' Lab Accepted
- First Second ;
Date i Rejected Result Result l Collected Analysis Codes
- I VE - 6031,6032 A 0.010.0;0.0. 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Sr-90 LW 6052,6053 A 0.911.1;1.1 -0.511.5;1.5- I Sep,1996 Co40 LW -6052,6053 A 0311.3;13 0.912.3;2.3 !
.Sep,1996 Cs 134
~
LW - 6052,6053 A 0.011.3:1.3 -0.1 i t.9;1.9 i
.Sep,1996. Cs-137 LW 6052,6053 A 2.110.7;0.8 3.110.6;0.7 Sep,1996 Cr. Beta ,
LW - 6052,6053 A -0.410.4;0.4 0.0103;0.3 l Sep,1996 I131 LW - 6052,6053 A 1.216.0;6.0 1.7 i10.1;10.1 {
Sep,1996 I-131(g)
LW - 6052,6053 A 66.8 130.1;30.8 43.6f 27.1;27.4 j Sep,1996- K-40 WW - 6181,6182 A 1.6106;0.7 1.0i0.6;0.6 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta WW - 6181,6182 A 5.4 i 82.7;82.8 62.9 i 85.2;85.6 '
j Sep,1996 H-3 I-131 MI- 6006,6007 A 0.1iO3:03 0.0i0.3:03
) Sep,1996 1,472.0 1166.0;260.1 1,502.9 i 110.0;232.1 !
K 40 MI 6006,6007 A
) Sep,1996 4.611.6;1.8 4.611.6;1.8 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 6128,6129 A CW - 6128,6129 A 4.611.6;1.8 4.611.6;1.8 ,
- Sep,1996 Cr. Beta CW - 6128,6129 A 0.211.1;1.1 0311.1;1.1 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta SW - 6204,6205 A 1133 1 85.4;86.8 61.4 1 83.2;83.6
- Sep,1996 H-3 MI- 6225,6226 A 1.9i2.9;2.9 -0.6 i2.6;2.6 Sep,1996 Co-60 MI- 6225,6226 A 2.812.7;2.7 -0.312.5;2.5 Cs 137 Sep,1996 MI 6225,6226 A -0310.4;0.4 03 t0.4;0.4 2 Sep,1096 I131 VE - 6270,6271 A 2.2iO3
- 0.4 2.110.3;0.3 Sep,1996 K-40 WW - 6331,6332 A 16,801.2 i 999.6;2,494.1 17,111.9 11,006.0;2,535.4 l Sep,1996 H3 CW - 6294,6295 A 4.811.2;1.4 3.911.6;1.7 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 6294,6295 A 1.011.2;1.2 -0.311.1;1.1 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta K-40 VE - 6379,6380 A 1.710.3;03 1.8i0.2:0.3 Sep,1996 VE - 6379,6380 A -0.0 i 0.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Sr-89 l 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Sr 90 VE 6379,6380 A CW - 6432,6433 A 3.211.5:1.6 3.2 i t.5;1.6 i Sep,1996 Cr. Beta VE - 6481,6482 A 2.8i0.1:0.3 2.810.1;0.3 q i Sep,1996 Gr. Beta VE - 6481,6482 A 3.410.2;0.4 3.6i0.2;0.4 l Sep,1996 K-40 '
SW - 6524,6525 A 223.5 190.8;95.7 151.2 i 87.9;90.2 j Sep,1996 H-3 SWT - 6545,6546 A 2.710.5;0.7 2.1 i0.5;0.6
- Sep,1996 Gr. Beta AP-77 0,7221 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Co-60 F - 7220,7221 A -0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0
- Sep,1996 Cs 134 AP - 7220,7221 A -0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Cs 137 AP - 7220,7221 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 3 Sep,1996 I131(g)
AP - 7220,7221 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 i Sep,1996 K-40 DW - 6572,6573 A 1.010.6:0.7 0310.3;0.3 Sep,1996 Gr. Alpha DW - 6572,6573 A 2.910.8;0.9 2.510.3;0.5 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta y-20
- i. . _ . _. _ - _ . _ . _ _.
I
-- . _- .. . = - _ . -
- l l
Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentrationin pCi/L' bb Accepted' First Second Date Result Collected Analysis Codes" Rejected Result ,
SW - 6593,6594 A 58.2 180.0;80.4 90.0181.4;823 Sep,1996 H-3 I CW - 6616,6617 A 3.111.6;1.7 5.011.7;1.9 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 6616,6617 A 0311.1;1.1 -0.311.0;1.0 l Sep,1996 Gr. Beta 21.7 i 80.1;80.2 88.5 i 83.1;83.9 Sep,1996 H3 PW - 6675,6676 A f AP - 7537,7538 A 0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 j Sep,1996 Co40 AP - 7537,7538 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 '
Sep,1996 Cs 137 VE - 6654,6655 A -0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 I Sep,1996 Co-60 VE - 6654,6655 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 l Sep,1996 Cs 137 CW - 6719,6720 A 3.0i t.4;1.5 2.111.5;1.5 Sep,1996 Cr. Beta CW - 6719,6720 A -0.3 i t.1; 1.1 1.111.2;1.2 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta AP - 7558,7559 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Co-60 AP - 7558,7559 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Co-60 AP - 7558,7559 A -0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Cs-137 AP - 7558,7559 A -0.0i0.0;0.0 0.0i0.0;0.0 Sep,1996 Cs-137 WW - 66%,6697 A 313.7 i 99.0;107.8 302.7 198.6;106.8 Sep,1996 H3 LW - 7118,7119 A 0.010.4;0.4 -0.210.4;0.4 Sep,1996 Cr. Alpha LW - 7118,7119 A 2.1i0.4;0.5 1.610.6;0.6 Sep,1996 Gr. Beta A 893 i81.1;82.0 92.8 i81.3;823 Sep,1996 H3 LW - 7118,7119 E - 6783,6784 A 0910.0;0.1 1.010.0;0.1 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta Oct,1996 K 40 E - 6783,6784 A 0.910.1:0.2 1.1i0.2:0.2 E - 6783,6784 A -0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Sr-89 E - 6783,6784 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Sr-90 SW - 6877,6878 A 1,223.5 i119.6;2N.9 1,320.2 il22.4;2173 Oct,1996 H-3 AP - 7199,7200 A -0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Sr-89 AP -7199,7200 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Sr-90 Oct,1996 Mi- 6746,6747 A -0.110.3;0.3 0.1103;0.3 1131 M1 6746,6747 A 1,427.9 1180.0:264.8 1,4253 1208.0;2843 Oct,1996 K-40 Oct,1996 F - 6824,6825 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Co-60 Oct,1996 Cs-137 F - 6824,6825 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 WW - 6926,6927 A 0.9i t.4;1.4 -0.4 i 2.8;2.8 Oct,1996 Co-60 Oct,1996 Cs-137 WW - 6926,6927 A 1311.5;1.5 1.8i3.2:3.2 WW - 6926,6927 A 7.11783;783 -3.5177.8;77.8 Oct,1996 H-3 Oct,1996 Co-60 G - 7001,7002 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Cs 134 G -7001,7002 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Cs-137 G - 7001,7002 A -0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Gr.Deta C -7001,7002 A 5.210.3:0.6 5.2iO3:0.6 G 7001,7002 A -0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 1-131(g)
Oct,1996 K-40 G -7001,7002 A 6.210.7;0.9 5.510.4;0.7 V - 21
e' ,
Table A-4. In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' First Second Date Lab Accepted' Rejected Result Result Collected Analysis Codes
- 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Cs 137 SS - 7024, 7025 A 7.7i2.0;2.2 6.5i t.8;2.0 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta SS - 7024, 7025 A 7.210.6;0.9 6.910.4;0.8 Oct,1996 K 40 SS - 7024,7025 A 1.613.1;3.1 -0.812.9;2.9 Oct,1996 Co-60 LW - 7045,7046 A
-0.0 i3.0.;3.0 -1.913.1;3.1 Oct,1996 Cs-134 LW 7045,7046 A
-1.0 i 2.9;2.9 1.9 i3.0;3.0 Oct,1996 Cs 137 LW - 7045,7046 A 2.810.7;0.9 2.910.5;0.7 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 7045,7046 A 0.210.4;0.4 -0.210.5;0.5 Oct,1996 I131 LW - 7045,7046 A 5.2129.9;29.9 5.8127.7;27.7 Oct,1996 l131(gi LW 7045,7046 A 513137.9;38.2 34.5 133.8;34.0 Oct,1996 K-40 LW 7045,7046 A 2.8 i0.2:0.3 2.7f 0.1;0.3 Oct,1996 K-40 F - 6952,6953 A
-0.814.8;4.8 1.8 i2.8;2.8 Oct,1996 Co-60 M1 - 6853,6854 A 1.613.6;3.6 -0.9 f 2.4;2.4 Oct,1996 Cs-137 MI- 6853,6854 A
-0.1103;0.3 0.210.3;0.3 Oct,1996 1131 M1 - 6853,6854 A 1.8 i2.8;2.8 0.514.9;4.9 Oct,1996 Co40 MI- 6854,6855 A 1.812.8;2.8 0.514.9;4.9 Oct,1996 Co-60 Mi- 6854,6855 A
-0.912.4;2.4 1.613.3;3.3 Oct,1996 Cs-137 MI - 6854,6855 A
-0.9 i2.4;2.4 1.613.3;33 Oct,1996 Cs-137 Mi- 6854,6855 A 0.010.2;0.2 0.210.3;0.3 Oct,1996 I131 Mi- 6854,6855 A A 0.2103:03 -0.210.3;03 Oct,1996 1-131 MI- 6854,6855 MI- 6854,6855 A 0.2103:0.3 -0.210.3 0.3 Oct,1996 I131 9.612.5;2.6 7.9 i 2.3;2.5 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta BS - 7138,7139 A A 7.210.4;0.8 7.210.5;0.9 Oct,1996 K 40 BS - 7138,7139 A 0.210.0;0.0 0.210.0;0.0 Oct,1996 Cs.137 S O - 7306,7307 A 9.5 i 0.5;1.1 9.5f 0.7;1.2 Oct,1996 K 40 S O 7306,7307 DO - 7747,7748 A 1.7i03;0.4 1.510.3;03 Oct,1996 Gr.Deta DO - 7747,7748 A 0.7i0.2;0.2 0.610.1;0.2 Oct,1996 K-40 F - 7328,7329 A 2.1 0.5;0.5 1.710.4;0.4 Oct,1996 K 40 MI- 7285,7286 A -0.110.2;0.2 -0.1 f 0.2 0.2 Oct,1996 1131 CW - 7176,7177 A 3.111.0;1.2 2.211.0;1.1 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta M1 - 7351,7352 A -0.511.3;1.3 -2.711.2;1.2 Oct,1996 Sr-89 MI- 7351,7352 A 1.610.4;0.4 1.610.4:0.4 Oct,1996 St-90 VE - 7425,7426 A 1.910.2:03 1.710.3;0.3 Oct,1996 K-40 M1 - 7514,7515 A 2.215.1:5.1 5.9 f 5.4;5.4 Oct,1996 Co-60 M1 - 7514,7515 A 2.215.1;5.1 5.915.4;5.4 Oct,1996 Co-60 M1 - 7514,7515 A 0313.4:3.4 1314.3;43 Oct,1996 Cs-137 MI- 7514,7515 A 0313.4;3.4 13 4.3;43 Oct,1996 Cs 137 ,
Oct,1996 1131 MI- 7514,7515 A -0.0103:03 0.0103:0.3 V - 22
\
Table A-4. in-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' Second i Date Lab Accepted' First Rejected Result Result l Collected Analysis Codes
- F - 7584,7585 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 l Oct,1996 Co40 P - 7584,7585 A 0.0i0.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 l Oct,1996 Cs-137 WW - 7653,7654 A 0311.7;1.7 3.1i2.8;2.8 ;
Oct,1996 Co-60 Oct,1996 Co40 WW - 7653,7654 A 0.Sil.7;1.7 -3.li2.8:2.8 ,
WW - 7653,7654 A -03 t 2.0;2.0 -1.4 i3.6;3.6 Oct,1996 Cs-137 WW - 7653,7654 A 0312.0:2.0 -1.4 i3.6;3.6 Oct,1996 Cs-137 WW - 7653,7654 A 20.6 1 75.9;75.9 27.1 1 78.1;78.2 Oct,1996 H-3 SS - 8040, 8041 A 22.210.8;2.4 23.5 i 0.9;2.5 Oct,1996 K-40 SWT - 7972,7973 A 2.710.5;0.7 2.110.5;0.6 Oct,1996 Gr. Deta CW - 7794,7795 A 1.2 i t.7;1.7 2.4it.8;1.8 Oct,1996 Gr. Beta DW - 7994,7995 A 1.610.5:0.5 1.810.5;0.5 Oct,1996 Gr. Deta DW - 7994,7995 A 64.1 i 81.7;82.1 29.6 180.1;80.2 Oct,1996 H-3 '
WW - 8121,8122 A 5.210.8;1.1 4.910.7;1.1 Nov,1996 Gr. Beta WW - 8121,8122 A 49.21783;78.6 25.8177.2;773 Nov,1996 H-3 CW - 8089,8090 A 2.111.8;1.8 -0.1 i l.6; 1.6 Nov,1996 Gr. Deta CW - 8089,8090 A -0.311.5;1.5 0.0i1.6;1.6 Nov,1996 Gr. Deta SWU - 8213,8214 A 2.610.6;0.7 2.010.6;0.7 Nov,1996 Gr. Beta SWU - 8213,8214 A 257.9 1 86.7;93.5 234.9 185.7;91.5 Nov,1996 H-3 SWU - 8213,8214 A 1093 141.2;42.6 97.liS2.0;52.9 Nov,1996 K-40 CW - 8302,8303 A 0.911.4;1.4 2.li t.4;1.5 Nov,1996 Gr. Beta Nov,1996 I131 M1- 8337,8338 A -0.010.2:0.2 0.1 i0.2:0.2 MI- 8337,8338 A 1,454.6 i 91.6;218.0 1,365.5 1193.0;267.8 Nov,1996 K-40 WW - 8561,8562 A 4,719.0 1197.0;6713 4,718.9 i 197.2;671.4 Nov,1996 H-3 SW - 8581,8582 A 3.210.7;0.8 2.Si0.6;0.7 Nov,1996 Gr. Beta WW - 8681,8682 A 0.111.8:1.8 -1.7 i t .5;1.6 Nov,1996 Gr. Alpha WW - 8681,8682 A 2.811.7;1.7 1311.7;1.7 Nov,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 8612,8613 A 2.611.5;1.6 1.9 1.4;1.5 Nov,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 8612,8613 A 0.1i1.1;1.1 -0.8 1.1;1.1 Nov,1996 Cr. Beta CW - 9219,9220 A 0.5il.9;1.9 -0.311.7;1.7 Nov,1996 Co-60 Nov,1996 Cs 137 CW - 9219,9220 A 1.412.0:2.0 0.2 1.6;1.6 A 2,091.71 147.1:320.2 2,2063 1149.9;335.4 Nov,1996 H3 CW - 9219,9220 Nov,1996 Gr. Alpha CW 8830,8831 A 0.2103:0.3 0.4iO3:0.3 CW - 8830,8831 A 11.110.6;1.8 10.210.6;1.7 Nov,1996 Gr. Deta CW 8830,8831 A 2,053.5 1144.0:314.2 2,112.2 1145.5;322.0 Nov,1996 H-3 Nov,1996 Sr-89 CW 8830,8831 A -0310.5;0.5 -0310.6;0.6 Nov,1996 Sr-90 CW - 8830,8831 A 03103 0.3 0310.4;0.4 Dec,1996 Gr.Deta SW - 8635,8636 A 2.510.8;0.9 3.110.8;0.9 Dec,1996 K-40 SW 8635,8636 A 90.1 i S2.8;53.6 90.4 51.9:52.7 V - 23
s' i 1
Table A-4. In house "duptkate" program.
Concentration in pCi/L' j Lab Accepted' First Second ;
Date Result Collected Analysis Cadam* Rejected Result DW - 8660,8661 - A 2.1i0.6;0.7 1.910.6;0.7 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta DW - 8660,8661 - A 110.1 1 83.7;85.0 1173 184.0;85.5 Dec,1996 H-3 Dec,1996 I131 MI- 8704,8705 A -03iO3:0.3 -0.3i03:03 l MI- 8704,8705 A 1,301.2 1141.0;2263 1,342.9 1150.0;2363 l Dec,1996 K-40 MI- 8725,8726 A 05f 2.8;2.8 0.414.4;4.4 l Dec,1996 Co-60
-0.613.8;3.8 I Dec,1996 Cs-134 MI- 8725,8726 A 1.2123;2.3 Dec,1996 Cs-137 MI- 8725,8726 A 1.8i2.5;2.6 1.l i3.4:3.4 MI- 8725,8726 A -0.210.2;0.2 -0.210.2;0.2 Dec,1996 I131 l Dec,1996 l131(g) Mi- 8725,8726 A -1.013.4;3.4 4.514.9:4.9 ;
i MI- 8725,8726 A 1,402.2 1 111.0;220.7 1,297.5 1150.0;231.6 Dec,1996 K-40 MI- 8725,8726 A -1.111.0;1.0 ' 1.0 1.0;1.0 l
Dec,1996 Sr-89 Mi- 8725,8726 A 1310.4:0.4 1.110.4;0.4 j Dec,1996 Sr 90 S O - 8802,8803 A 0.5i0.0;0.1 0.510.0;0.1 Dec,1996 Cs-137 5 0 - 8802,8803 A 14.014.3;4.5 13.914.0;4.3 ,
Dec,1996 Gr. Alpha S O - 8802,8803 A 21.4 i 3.1;3.8 21.512.9;3.6 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta S O - 8802,8803 A 11.110.7;1.3 10.810.6;1.2 :
Dec,1996 K-40 '
SWU - 9540,9541 A 7.510.9;1.5 6.010.8;1.2 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta SWU - 9540,9541 A 90.2 1 86.7;87.6 86.5186.6;873 i Dec,1996 H3 F - 9040,9041 A 0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 {
Dec,1996 Co-60 F - 9040,9041 A -0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 l Dec,1996 Cs 134 F - 9040,9041 A 0.010.0;0.0 0.010.0;0.0 Dec,1996 Cs-137 F -9040,9041 A 3.6i0.1:0.4 3.Si0.1;0.4 <
Dec,1996 Gr. Beta F - 9040,9041 A 0.010.0;0.0 -0.010.0;0.0 ;
Dec,1996 I-131(g)
F - 9040,9041 A 3310.5;0.6 3.010.4;0.5 Dec,1996 K 40 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 9109,9110 A 4.111.2;1.4 2.0i t.5;1.6 Dec,1996 Gr. Beta CW 9109,9110 A -0.911.3:1.3 -1.1 il.3;1.3 l MI- 9197,9198 A 0.110.4;0.4 -0.110.4;0.4 Dec,1996 I-131 I
Mi- 9197,9198 A 1,462.6 1 143.0;245.0 1,381.2 1149.0;239.8 Dec,1996 K-40 Dec,1996 WW - 9269,9270 A -1.1123:2.3 0312.6;2.6 Co-60 Dec,1996 Cs-137 WW - 9269,9270 A -1.212.2:2.2 0.212.6;2.6 i WW - 9269,9270 A 1,051.1 i 116.8;184.6 1,126.1 i119.0;194.0 j Dec,1996 H-3 '
Dec,1996 Co-60 LW - 9291,9292 A -0.212.0;2.0 1.212.3:2.3 4.012.2;2.3 0.212.8;2.8 i Dec,1996 Cs 137 LW - 9291,9292 A Dec,1996 Gr. Beta LW - 9291,9292 A 4.911.3;1.5 7311.4;1.8 i Dec,1996 H3 SW 9743,9744 A 1.2 i 89.8:89.8 51.6191.8;92.1 i 4.010.7;0.9 4.610.8:1.0 :
Dec,1996 Gr. Beta SW - 9414,9415 A Dec,1996 Gr. Beta DW - 9520,9521 A 6.211.3;1.6 5.711.2;1.5 l Dec,1996 I131 DW - 9520,9521 A 03i0.4;0.4 0.210.4:0.4 i V - 24 ,
I
.0 i
Table A-4, In-house " duplicate" program.
Concentration in pCl/L' f I
lab Accepted' First Semnd Date _ Result t
_Ccliected Analysis CW* Rejected Result 4.811.7;1.9 4.611.6;1.7 ;
Doc,1996 Gr. Beta CW - 9383,9384 A 0.6t!.5;1.5 0.4 i t.5;1.5 Dec,1996 Cr, Beta CW - 9383,9384 A 309.3 1 91.1;100.3 247.1 i 88.6;94.8 Dec,1996 H-3 SW - 9433,9434 A 241.0 191.9;97.6 126.6 t87.3;88.9 Dec,1996 He3 SW - 9497,9496 A l 2.0i0.6;0.7 2.210.6;0.7 Dec,1996 Cr. Beta DW - 9564,9565 A I 120.8 1 83.4;85.0 94.2 i 82.2;83.2 Dec,1996 H-3 DW 9564,9565 A
- All concentrations are reported in pCi/L,except solid samples, which are reported in pCi/g wet. Results are l
reported as ActivityfCounting Error; Total Propagated Uncertainty (TPU).
- Lab codes are comprised of the sample media and the sample numbers. Client codes have been eliminated to protat client anonymity. :
- Acceptance is based on the difference of the two results divided by the pooled standard deviation being less two,where the pooled standard deviation is the square root of the sum of the squares of the TPUs.
T I
l l
l i
't i
)
1 1
V - 25 I
Table A-5. Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP),
comparison of MAPEP and Teledyne's Midwest laboratory results for various sample media'.
Concentration in Bq/kg*
Date MAPEP Result' Control Teledyne Results Lab Sample Code Type Collected Analysis 1s, N=1 Limits iStandard Deviation' 28.712.8 20.9 - 37.3 27.0 2.7 STSO-776 SOIL Sep,1996 Am-241 Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
568.4 - 1,055.6 879.087.9 STSO-776 SOlt Sep,1996 Co-60 812.0 1 83.5 Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
1,531.0 i 193.4 1,071.7 - 1,990.3 1,716.0171.6 STSO-776 S01L Sep,1996 Cs-137 Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
Sep,1996 Pu-238 15.911.8 11.1 - 20.7 13.0 1.3 STSO-776 SOIL Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program i
Summary Report.
I Sep,1996 Pu-239/240 19.7 i 2.0 13.8 - 25.6 18.0 1.8 STSO-776 SOIL Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
Sep,1996 Sr-90 536.0 1 57.1 375.2 - 696.8 441.044.1 STSO-776 SOIL Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
Sep,1996 U-234/233 63.917.3 44.7 - 83.1 59.0 5.9 STSO 776 SOIL Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
SOIL Sep,1996 U-238 61.016.4 44.8 - 83.2 60.0 6.0 STSO-776 Standard deviation for three determinations not reported in Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program Summary Report.
- Results obtained by Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program, Idaho Operations office, Idaho Palls, Idaho.
- All results are in becquerels per kilogram as requested by the Department of Energy.
- Unless otherwise indicated, the T13EESML results are given as the mean 11 standard deviations for three determinations.
' MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma,1 determination) and control limits as defined by the M APEP.
V-26
5 Table A-6. Environmental Measurements laboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML),
comparison of EML and Teledyne's Midwest laboratory results for various a vmple media'.
Concentration in Bq/L" Lab Sample Date Control d
Code Type Collected Analysis Teledyne Result' EML Result Limits' STW 755 Water Mar,1996 Am-241 0.810.1;0.1 0.810.0 0.7-1.6 STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Co-60 33.6 i 1.0;4.9 32.810.6 0.9-1.2 STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Cs-137 42.8113;6.3 383 0.9 0.9-13 STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Fe-55 109.0 i 21.7;24 3 83.013.4 03-1.6 STW-755 Water Mar,1996 H-3 434.01 34.1;68.2 251.0 1 11.4 0.7-1.9 STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Mn-54 41.9 i 1.4;4.4 38.4 i 1.2 0.9-1.2 STW-755 Water Mar,1996 Pu-238 0.9101:0.1 1.010.1 0.7-13 STW 755 Water Mar,1996 Pu-239 0.710.1;0.1 0.8 1 0.1 0.6 - 1.4 STW 755 Water Mar,1996 Sr-90 2.210.7;0.7 1.5 1 0.0 0.7-1.7 STW-756 Water Mar,1996 Gr. Alpha 2,180.0 1 53.5;2713 1,850.0 i 185.0 0.6-13 STW-7S6 Water Mar,1996 Gr. Deta 872.0 1 27.0;137.0 744.0 1 74.0 0.8-1.7 STSO-757 Soil Mar,1996 Am-241 6.212.9;2.9 3.710.5 0.5-2.4 STSO-757 Soil Mar,1996 Cs-137 404.0 1 0.2;40.4 359.0 i 10.0 0.7-1.4 STSO-757 Soil Mar,1996 K-40 525.0 i 233;57.4 465.01 30.0 0.7-1.6 STSO-757 Soil Mar,1996 Pu-238 42311.6;4.5 43.012.4 0.2-2.0 STSO-757 Soil Mar,1996 Pu-239 9.010.7;1.1 9.2i03 0.6 - 2.0 STSO-757 Soil Mar,1996 Sr-90 1,200.0 1 323;1243 1,340.01 113.0 0.6-3.0 STSO-757 Soil Mar,1996 Uranium 68.212.4;7.2 71.714.2 03 -1.5 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1990 Am-241 6.1113;1.4 5.6 1 0.2 0.6-2.9 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1996 Cm-244 6.011.2;1.3 4.4 i 0.2 0.4 - 1.9 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1996 Co-60 65.614.0;9.8 59.711.0 0.6-1.5 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1996 Cs-137 1,100.0 1 12.6;150.1 944.0 1 16.2 0.8-1.5 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1996 K-40 1,190.0 i 61.6;134.0 1,030.0 1 33.0 0.5-1.5 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1996 Pu-239 9.2113;1.6 9.811.2 0.6-2.0 STVE-758 Vegetation Mar,1996 Sr-90 1,210.0 1 32.2;125.2 1,300.0 1 52.4 0.5-1.4 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Am-241 0.310.0;0.0 0.210.0 0.6 - 1.9 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Ce-144 23.2 i 1.0;2.5 333133 0.6-13 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Co-57 6.110.1;0.6 8.910.9 0.6-13 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Co-60 26.510.4;2.7 29.5 i 2.9 0.7-13 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Cs-134 12.9103;13 14.711.5 0.7-1.2 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Cs-137 6.210.9;1.1 6.6 0.7 0.7-13 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Mn-54 3310.4;0.5 3.410.4 0.8-13 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Pu-238 0.110.0;0.0 0.110.0 0.6 - 1.6 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Pu-239 0.110.0;0.0 0.110.0 0.7-1.6 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Ru-106 10.2 i t.9; 2.1 11.611.4 0.5 - 1.6 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Sb-125 10.110.8;1.3 9.8i1.0 0.4-1.4 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Sr-90 1.110.2;03 1.110.0 0.6-23 STAF-759 Air Filter Mar,1996 Uranium 0.110.0;0.0 0.1 1 0.0 0.8-2.9 Y-27 l
1
Table A-6. Environmental Measurements Laboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML),
comparison of EML and Teledyne's Midwest laboratory results for various sample media *.
Concentration in Bq/L" Sample Date Control Lab d Code Type Collected Analysis Teledyne Result' EML Result Limits' STAF 760 Air Filter Mar,1996 Gr. Alpha 2.210.1;0.2 1.6i 0.2 0.8-1.6 STAF-760 Air Filter Mar,1996 Gr. Beta 2.0i 0.0;0.2 1.8i 0.2 0.8-1.9 ,
Water Sep,1996 Am-241 1.310.2;0.2 1.1 i 0.0 0.6 - 1.7 STW-770 STW 770 Water Sep,1996 Co-60 65.0 i 2.2;9.6 61.110.7 0.9-1.2 STW-770 Water Sep,1996 Cs-137 96.113.0;14.2 89.5 i 1.4 0.9-13 STW-770 Water Sep,1996 Gr. Alpha 993.0 i 12.2;121.8 1,210.0 1 121.0 0.5-13 STW-770 Water Sep,1996 Gr. Beta 579.0 1 8.1;89.5 540.0 1 54.0 0.6-1.6 STW 770 Water Sep,1996 H-3 488.0 1 34.6;74.8 587.0 1 58.0 0.7-1.9 STW-770 Water Sep,1996 Mn-54 65.0 i 3.0;7.1 60.510.6 0.9-1.2 STW 770 Water Sep,1996 Pu-238 1310.3;0.4 1.9i0.1 0.7-13 An investigation was conducted. No errors in calculations or transcription were noted. The analysis was repeated in duplicate under the observation of the Technical Lead. No descrepancies were noted in the performance of the procedum. The result of the reanalysis was 2.1410.11 Bq/L No further action is planned.
STW 770 Water Sep,1996 Pu-239 0.7i0.2;03 0.810.0 0.8-1.4 STW-770 Water Sep,1996 Sr-90 3.6i 0.7; 0.8 2.710.2 0.7-1.7 STW-770 Water Sep,1996 U-234 0.510.2;0.2 0.5i0.0 0.8-1.5 STW-770 Water Sep,1996 U-238 0.410.1;0.1 0.510.4 0.8-1.4 STSO.771 Soll Sep,1996 Am-241 15.613.8;4.1 13.510.5 0.5-2.7 )
STSO-771 Soil Sep,1996 Co-60 4.012.5;2.5 2.9 i 0.2 0.5-1.5 ]
STSO-771 Soil Sep,1996 Cs-137 1,750.0 1 24.4;176.7 1,550.0 1 22.2 0.8-13 STSO-771 Soil Sep,1996 K-40 369.0 1 59.5;70.0 300.0 1 25.0 0.7-1.7 STSO-771 Soil Sep,1996 Pu-238 0.810.4;0.4 1.1 1 0.2 0.4-1.9 STSO-771 Soll Sep,1996 Pu.239 24.011.9;3.1 21.8 i 1.1 0.7-1.9 STSO-771 Soil Sep,1996 Sr-90 63.6 i 4.0;7.5 69.915.1 0.5-2.8 STSO-771 Soil Sep,1996 U-234 37.213.8;5.3 39.2 i 2.4 0.4-13 STSO-771 Soll Sep,1996 U-238 40.814.0;5.7 41.6 i 0.6 0.4-1.6 STVE-772 Vegetation Sep,1996 Am-241 1.510.9;0.9 1.2 i 0.4 0.7-2.8 i STVE-772 Vegetation Sep,1996 Cm-244 0.610.5;0.5 0.8 1 0.1 0.5-1.7 STVE-772 Vegetatior. Sep,1996 Co.60 14.014.4;4.8 10.910.7 0.6-1.4 l STVE-772 Vegetation Sep,1996 Cs-137 219.01 10.1;31.4 190.0 i 6.7 0.8-1.5 STVE 772 Vegetation Sep,1996 K-40 1,160.0 1 99.4;152.8 992.0 1 29.0 0.8-1.5 STVE-772 Vegetation Sep,1996 Sr-90 1,420.0 1 35.1;1463 1,390.0 1 12.0 0.5-13 !
STAP 773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Co-57 11.8103;1.2 14.810.8 0.6-1.2 STAP 773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Co-60 9.210.4;1.0 8.6i 0.4 0.7-1.2 STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Cs-134 9.6i 0.4; 1.0 10.810.4 0.7-1.2 ;
STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Cs-137 8.7i 0.4;1.0 8.5 0.4 0.7-13 )
STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Gr. Alpha 0.710.0;0.1 1.210.1 0.8-1.6 An investigation was conducted and a transcription error while calculating the result was discovered. The j recalculated value is 1.1510.01Bq/ filter. No further action is planned.
V - 28 4
-. .-- - _ . . . . ~. -
l 4
Table A-6. Environmental Measurements bboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML),
comparison of EML and Teledyne's Midwest Laboratory resultdor various sample media'. -
Concentrationin Bq/L" ,
Date Control Lab Sample Cnda Type Collected Analysis Teledyne Result' EML Result' Limits' .
STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Gr. Beta 0.5 i 0.0; 0.1 0.5i0.1 0.7-1.8 STAP 773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Mn-54 7.110.5;0.8 6.4 0.3 0.8 - 1.3 .
STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Ru-106 11.5 i 3.2;3.4 10.8 i 1.1 0.6-1.3 l STAP-773 Air Filter Sep,1996 Sb 125 12.4 i 1.0;1.6 10.8i 0.5 0.6-1.4 l
' The Environmental Measurements bboratory provides the following nuclear species : Air Filters, Soil, Tissue, Vegetation and Water. Teledyne does not participate in the Tissue program.
- Results are reported in Bq/L with the following exceptions: Air filter results are reported in Bq/ filter, Soil l results are reported in Bq/kg, Vegetation results are reported in Bq/kg. The results of elemental uranium are reported in uCi/ filter, g, or ml.
' Teledyne results are reported as the mean of three determinationsistandard deviation; total promulgated '
uncertainty.
d The EML result listed is the mean of replicate determinations for each nuclidetthe standard error of the mean.
' The control limits are reported by EML and are established from percentiles of historic data distributions (1982-1992). The evaluation of this historic data and the development of the control limits are presented in !
DOE report EML-564.
r V - 29 1
j o
t i
h r
APPENDIX VI ERRATA DATA 1
I 1
l i
l l
1 VI- 1 1 l
):
, '% +
- O s
On March 6,1997, during a resiew of Commonwealth Edison's current ODCM, it was discovered that since 1991, when Comed began processing its environmental TLDs in-house, Comed has not been performing an interlaboratory comparison program to assess measurements of environmental radiation for those TLDs. This is required by section 5.3.1 of the ODCM.
Corrective action will be effective with the second quarter of 1997, during which Comed will populate Dresden Station's direct radiation environmental locations with its own environmental TLDs as well as with TLDs supplied by a vendor. Dresden's environmental TLDs are scheduled to be placed in the field on March 29,1997. Due to the short notice given to the vendor to supply us with their TLDs, the vendor's TLDs are expected to be placod in the field no later than April 5,1997, (The vendor's environmental TLD program does comply with section 5.3.1 of Comed's ODCM.)
Comed will develop an interlaboratory comparison program for its own environmental TLDs and will commence interlaboratory comparison as soon as its program is satisfactorily developed. The TLD records for environmental monitoring will be Dresden's TLDs, provide:I we have successfully implemented the interlaboratory comparison program. Otherwise, the vendor's TLDs will be Comed's environmental dose of record, and the dose to the vendor's TLDs for the period from the date the Dresden TLDs are placed in the field until the date the vendor's TLDs are placed in the field will be estimated.
l 1
1 1
VI-2 1
I
)