ML20136G979

Summarizes 841023 Telcon W/Congressman Bevill Re Seismic Upgrade.Both Technical & Legal Issues Involved.Related Info Encl

ML20136G979
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	10/30/1984
From:	Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To:	Asselstine, Bernthal, Roberts NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20136F570	List: ML20136F564 ML20136G574 ML20136G595 ML20136G606 ML20136G634 ML20136G652 ML20136G658 ML20136G664 ML20136G672 ML20136G683 ML20136G691 ML20136G699 ML20136G706 ML20136G712 ML20136G716 ML20136G721 ML20136G979 ML20136G999 ML20136H016 ML20136H034 ML20136H048
References
FOIA-84-885 NUDOCS 8508200116
Download: ML20136G979 (3)

Text

_ _ - _

_ _ . _ _ _ . 1._ _.. _ _-._ _ _ _ _ _

1. ' UNITED STATES

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION b

g -l WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

\[@'4 .....

p$

1 CHAIRMAN Octcber 30, 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR: Commissioner Roberts ,

Commissioner Asselstine l Commissioner Bernthal Commissioner Zech .)

FROM: Nunzio J. Palladino s

SUBJECT:

SAN ONOFRE UNIT 1 On October 23, 1984, I returned a call from Congressman Bevill.

He stated that friends and colleagues had expressed concern about San Onofre Unit 1. He indicated a substantial amount of money had already been spent on the seismic upgrade of Unit 1 and that the utility had been following Harold Denton's guidance. He stated that the NRC lawyers were now preventing the staff from fulfilling its commitments. He said his call was to make certain that the Unit I restart matter was under attention.

I told Congressman Bevill that both technical and legal issues were involved and that the utility's submittals had been received on both issues and were under review. I said that .

Unit I restart was under close scrutiny, and that -the Commission 1 was attempting to reach a decision. l l

1 i

cc: SECY l

I

! 1 i

l 8508200116 850709 PDR FDIA BELL 85-885 PDR

,,.,,,',.  % erntWo.!!er SAN ONOFRE UNIT 1 -

STATUS 10/29/84

! INFORMATION M REFERENCE

1. COMPLETION OF RETURN TO SERVICE PLAN LTR. CRUTCHFIELD A. CERTIFICATION PLAN COMPLETE TO BASKIN 10/19/84 B. DETERMINATION FAILURES IN NON-UPGRADED 1 SYSTEMS WILL NOT PREVENT HOT I- -

STANDBY C. CONFIRMATION OF MASONRY WALL AS-BUILT f , CONFIGURATION (RECEIVED 10/29/84)

,. D. CONFIRMATION OF ANALYSIS QA/QC'FOR 0.67G UPGRADES

' E. DETERMINISTIC BASIS FOR RESTART ]

} (IN 10/17/84 SCE L7R.)

I .

2. RD ORT DESCRIPTION OF 0.5G EVALUATION TELECONS GRIMES To BASKIN 10/24

AND 10/25/84

3. TDI - EVALUATION OF CRANKSHAFT CRACKING LTR. CRUTCHFIELD (REPORT RECEIVED 10/29/84 - COMPLETENESS TO BASKIN 9/18/84

_g NOT YET VERIFIED) AND MTG 10/22/84

4. REACTOR TRIP BREAKER TEST RESULTS GENERIC LTR 83-28 EVALUATION To REGION V o

5. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION AUDIT REVIEW 10/02 i'

JC0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THRU 10/04/84 AND MTG, 10/26/84 l .

.}; e . ,-

-y .

INFORMATION DUE REFERENCE -

6* MASONRY WALLS - SUPPORTING INFORMATION MTG. 09/05/84 l

7.* RESUBMIT "0VERPRESSURE MIT!GATION SYSTEM"

' TELECON MCKENNA 1 I

PROPOSED TECH SPECS TO RAINSBERRY 07/17/84

~

8.* REVISION To LIMITING OVERTIME TECH SPEC LTR. PAULSON TO l

, BASKIN 09/05/84 l 9.* SEP INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT - MTG, 07/10/84 -

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND UPDATE i 10.* APPENDIX J TECH SPEC REVIEW TELECON MCKENNA TO SUPPOR'!NG T INFORMATION RAINSBERRY 06/29/84 11.' ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW - LTR. CRUTCHFIELD TO SUPPORTING INFORMATION BASKIN 05/09/84 [

12,* ORGANIZATION TECH SPEC - \

LTR. PAULSON TO SUPPORTING INFORMATION BASKIN 09/07/84 l

• NOT REQUIRED FOR RESTART EVALUATION  ;

A FEW REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE CURRENTLY BEIriG [

PREPARED IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER ONGOING REVIEWS WHICH SHOULD NOT AFFECT RESTART. '

.. . .. . _ . . . '. - -~

1----_--- _ _ . -