ML20136E282
| ML20136E282 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1982 |
| From: | Johnston W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Novak T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136D968 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-425 NUDOCS 8209230114 | |
| Download: ML20136E282 (2) | |
Text
-
jWeng
(
4 A,
UNITED STATES y
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- g(
y WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 0
AUG 31 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Thomas Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing Division of Licensing FROM:
William V. Johnston, Assistant Director Materials & Qualifications Engineering Division of Engineering f.
SUBJECT:
SUPPLEMENTAL SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT FOR SAN ONOFRE UNITS 2 AND 3 FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM DE7IATIONS FROM BTP CMEB 9.5-1 1
In the SER we stated that based on the applicant's commitments to modify the facility, we believed that the San Onofre 2 and 3 fire protection program will meet the requirements of Appendix R to 10 CFR 50 when the committed modifications had been completed.
- However, since Appendix R did not apply to San Onofre 2 and 3 at the time our fire protection review was conducted, we did not require the applicant to specifically evaluate all aspects of the fire protection program for compliance with Appendix R.
Since that time, our fire protection i
criteria have been delineated in NUREG-0800 (the Standard Review Plan),
Section 9.5-1, which also includes Appendix R.
We therefore conditioned the San Onofre 2 operating license to require the applicant to submit an evaluation of the plant against the criteria of Section. 9.5.1_of NUREG-0800 prior to exceeding 5 percent power.
In the interim, plant operation was considered acceptable because the staff's audit review described in the SER indicated compliance with Appendix R or an l
equivalent level of protection.
By letter dated July 22, 1982, the applicant committed to meet the technical requirements of Section III.G, " Fire Protection of Safe
~~
Shutdown Capability," III.J " Emergency Lighting," and III.0 " Oil Collection System for Reactor Coolant Pump" of Appendix R to 10 CFR 50.
The applicant also provided a comparison of the plant fire protection program against our criteria of Section 9.5-1 of NUREG '
0800 (July 1981) delineating the deviations from our guidelines.
In addition, the applicant identified inconsistencies in our Safety Evaluation Report relating to fire protection.
)
.[
f g u m m y' n w
z s
l
^
~
~ ~ " -
'.1__.
\\
~
'.5' j,, p.*
Thomas Novak
,2
/
,i By letter dated July 27, 1982 the applicant proposed modification to comply with our guidelines.
Our evaluation of the identified i
deviations from BTP 9.5-1 and apparent inconsistencies in the SER is attached.
Based on our evaluation, we find that the requested deviations with the commitments made in the July 27, 1982 letter are acceptable.
%fAL& Y William V. Johnston, Assistant Director Materials & Qualifications Engineering Division of Engineerint- -
j
~
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
R. Vollmer D. Eisenhut V. Benaroya l
F. Miraglia R. Ferguson H. Rood T. Sullivan
- 5. Pawlicki
- 0. Parr J. Taylor R. Eberly AE00 S. Ebneter, Region I T. Conlon, Region II C. Norelius, Region III G. Madsen, Region IV P. Sternberg, Region V
)
l l
I i
i 1
1
/
n,.n.-
,