ML20136D622

Forwards Cost Analysis Group Review of Cost Analysis Contained in Dec 1984 Draft of Regulatory Analysis of Recommendations Concerning Operator Shift Scheduling..., Per 850220 Request.Review Supportive

ML20136D622
Person / Time
Issue date:	03/13/1985
From:	Triner E NRC OFFICE OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (ORM)
To:	Russell W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20136C160	List: IA-85-361, Forwards Cost Analysis Group Rept Re Cost Analysis in Support of Proposed Revs to 10CFR50,App J,Per Dec 1984 Request.Proposes That Rept Be Issued as Nureg.App J Revs Will Result in Cost Savings.W/O Rept ML20136C156 ML20136C289 ML20136C414 ML20136C458 ML20136C476 ML20136C501 ML20136C519 ML20136C549 ML20136C951 ML20136C957 ML20136C967 ML20136C986 ML20136D017 ML20136D045 ML20136D070 ML20136D108 ML20136D124 ML20136D226 ML20136D242 ML20136D266 ML20136D294 ML20136D311 ML20136D328 ML20136D345 ML20136D376 ML20136D400 ML20136D428 ML20136D598 ML20136D614 ML20136D622 ML20136D647 ML20136D670 ML20136D695 ML20136D709 ML20136D731 ML20136D743 ML20136E335 ML20136E359 ML20136E376 NUREG/CR-4025, Preliminary Review of Cost Analysis Contained in NUREG/CR-4025 Concerning Proposed Design Mods to Gessar
References
FOIA-85-361 NUDOCS 8511210335
Download: ML20136D622 (1)

Text

.

' ' +.

:n c:.m

~n;...v., ncu L.:.r: =' acw.asmon

\\

i "a nt:#G7':=s.0.O. ZIM r

--- y idd.L3 5 MEMORANDUM FOR: William T. Russell, Acting Director Division of Human Factors Safety Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:

Edwin G. Triner, Director Division of Budget and Analysis Office of Resource Management

SUBJECT:

COST ANALYSIS GROUP (CAG) REVIEW 0F REGULATORY ANALYSIS FOR 4

THE SHIFT SCHEDULING PROJECT In response to your request of February 20, 1985, the CAG has reviewed Pacific Northwest Laboratory's December 1984 draft of " Regulatory Analysis Concerning Operator Shift Scheduling and Overtime in Nuclear Power Plants."

On balance, our review of the cost analysis portion of the contractor's analysis is supportive in that it addresses the full range of potential impacts with clarity and at a sufficient level of detail. Our review does, however, identify a number of weaknesses, and recomends revisions, which in our view, would improve the overall cost assessment.

These are discussed in detail in the attached CAG report.

The CAG contact for this review is Sidney Feld, X28331.

9

,/ /. ^'.

f

'l

.,;6$ V Edwin G. Triner, Director Division of Budget and Analysis Office of Resource Management

Attachment:

As stated cc w/ attachment:

D. Morisseau, NRR W. Minners, NRR S. Stern, NRR L. Barry, RM

1. Feld, RM B. Richter, RM N N.

8511210335 851022 PDR FOIA

, L;" W g

BELLB5-361 PDR M