IR 05000302/1996016
| ML20135B183 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 10/30/1996 |
| From: | Fredrickson P, Thompson D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20135B135 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-96-16, NUDOCS 9612040197 | |
| Download: ML20135B183 (2) | |
Text
d
'
.
/ *
.
!
'
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION 11 Docket No:
50-302 License No:
DPR-72 Report No:
50-302/96-16 Licensee:
Florida Power Corporation Facility:
Crystal River Nuclear Plant Unit 3 j
f Location:
15760 West Power Line Street l
Crystal River, FL 34428-6708 Dates:
October 29 - October 30,1996 Inspector:
D. Thompson, Safeguards Inspector Approved by:
Paul E. Fredrickson, Chief Specialinspection Branch Division of Reactor Projects Documenttrenommedheedh containseeneinveunciosamed informauort WhencaparatedM 9612040197 961127 N#""
~
'
PDR ADOCK 05000302 G
PDR mcwsuar
--
-
- - - -
_
-
,*},,.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
,
Crystal River Nuclear Plant Unit 3 NRC Inspection Report 50-302/96-16 This routine announced inspection was conducted in the area of plant support by a regional safeguards specialist. The specific area evaluated was the Malevolent Use of Vehicles at Nuclear Power Plants.
,
The inspector concluded that the vehicle barrier system, using a combination of steel
-
'
cables, gates, jersey barriers, barrier post, bollards, buildings and terrain, was an acceptable barrier capable of stopping a design basis vehicle traveling at the established speed prior to the vehicle penetrating the protected area perimeter and
.
causing damage to vital equipment. Based on review of the vehicle barrier system
'
(VBS), the inspector concluded that after the new access portal is operational a review of that portion of the VBS shall be conducted. (S2.5.1)
The inspector determined that the licensee had installed the vehicle barrier at a
-
,
i distance that would preclude an explosion from a bomb-laden vehicle from causing damage to vital targets required for the safe shutdown of the reactor. (62.5.2)
Based on the inspector's review of the VBS procedures and in discussion with the
-
licensee, the inspector concluded that the plans and procedures were acceptable for
,
implementing the VBS. The licensee agreed to include in the next security plan i
change that the minimum vehicle weight of a pick-up would be used in place of a degraded barrier. The licensee also agreed to include in the security plan change that the minimum acceptable weapon that an individual who was performing long term i
compensatory measures would be armed with would be a shotgun with slugs.
(S2.5.3)
!
i
- '
!
i
%%
'
wn. N
- a**nWs) e* QnQ SAFEGUARD 0 INFORMATION