IR 05000373/1985022
| ML20134H079 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 08/23/1985 |
| From: | Creed J, Pirtle G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20134H067 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-373-85-22, 50-374-85-24, NUDOCS 8508280265 | |
| Download: ML20134H079 (2) | |
Text
-
_
o
.
L U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Reports No. 50-373/85022(0RSS); 50-374/85024(DRSS)
Docket Nos. 50-373; 50-374 Licenses No. NPF-11; NPF-18 Safeguards Group IV Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 Facility Name:
LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At:
LaSalle County, Illinois Type of Inspection:
Unannounced Physical Security Inspection Dates of Inspection:
July 11 and August 9, 1985 in Region III Office July 23-26 and 29-31, 1985 onsite Dates of Previous Physical Security Inspection:
February 19 through March 11, 1985 Inspector:
Ah i h[.~tD 0 S/.t3/6 S G. L. Pittle Date Physical Security Inspector MOA%i b L
9/2n/ B 5 ApprovedBy:h.R.CrTed, Chief.
Date Safeguards Section Inspection Summary Inspection on July 11 through August 9, 1985 (Reports No. 50-373/85022(DRSS);
50-374/85024(DRSS))
Areas Inspected:
Included a review of Locks, Keys, and Combinations; Management Effectiveness; Lighting; Compensatory Measures; Access Control -
Personnel, Packages, and Vehicles; Security Force Training and Qualification Plan; Safeguards Contingency Plan; Testing and Maintenance; and Licensee's Actions on Previous Inspection Findings.
The inspection involved 58 inspector-hours by one NRC inspector.
The inspection began during the day shift.
Results:
The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the areas examined except as indicated below:
a.
Testing and Maintenance:
The alarm system for some dual purpose doors was not tested at the required interval (Paragraph 5.a of Report Details).
D$hk$
h373
-
Enclosure contains
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATTON*
PDR Upon separation this page is Decontrolled
r>
..
b.
Compensatory Measures: On occasion, required compensatory measures for an alarm system w!re not implemented (Paragraph 6.a of Report Details).
dditionally, some administrative changes to the security plan were required; reliability of a segment of an alarm system needs improvement; and training certification on a specific task needs to be completed.
'(Details - UNCLASSIFIED )
i a-I fnetoture contains Upon separation this
page is Decontrolled
.
J