ML20134H065
| ML20134H065 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 08/23/1985 |
| From: | Axelson W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20134H067 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8508280262 | |
| Download: ML20134H065 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000373/1985022
Text
-
e .
, , . m , t m n n n , e m. . ,
w
C .. w .n n . u a n a u . . . . ., s s . v
v FIB
.
'
AUG 2 3125
Docket No. 50-373
Docket No. 50-374
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN:
Mr. Cordell Reed
Vice President
Post Office Box 767
Chicago, IL 60690
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine physical security inspection conducted by
Mr. G. L. Pirtle of this office on July 11 through August 9,1985 of
activities at the LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, authorized by NRC
Operating Licenses No. NPF-11 and No. NPF-18 and to the discussion of our
findings with Mr. G. J. Diederich and others of your staff at the conclusion
of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in non-
compliance with NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Appendix.
A written response is required.
Additionally, corrective actions to resolve
several concerns are addressed in Paragraphs 5.b, 6.b, 7, and 8 of the Report
Details.
Please advise us within 30 days if our understanding of these
actions is incorrect.
Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject matter which is exempt
from disclosure according to Section 73.21(c)(2) of the NRC's " Rules of
Practice," Part 73, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
This information
must be handled and protected in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21.
Consequently, the enclosure to this letter, our report of this inspection, and
your response to the noncompliance identified in the enclosure to this letter
will not be placed in the Public Document Room.
Therefore, your statement of
corrective action regarding the noncompliance identified in the enclosure
should be submitted as a separate enclosure to your transmittal letter in the
manner prescribed.
The responses directed by this letter (and the accompanying Notice) are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
N
O
SBAS*BEESSSS!!?
9i
0
Enclosure contafas
SAFEGUARDS INF0fRATI0ft
O . r . ,u e ' r m nir-
.e.,,..
" {
Upon separatiot, this
'"-'wi..~
,,,, v , u , d t t . t. . .
page is Decontrolled
b
,.
,
.
.
. m n , , mg' .
n.-.-,s.,,.-
m-
Q .. ...
4 a vt) it,f,.."...Tiir.- il
Commonwealth Edison Company
2
M23E
f
,
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
/
/
e
~
sr
.
-
W. L. Axelson, Chief
Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix, Notice
of Violation
2.
Inspection Reports
No. 50-373/85022(DRSS);
No. 50-374/85024(DRSS)
(UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION)
cc w/ enclosures:
D. L. Farrar, Director
of Nuclear Licensing
G. J. Diederich, Plant
Manager
IE File
IE/DI/0RPB
,
IE/ES
NMSS/SGPL
NRR/DL/SSPB
cc w/ enclosures, w/o UNCLASSIFIED
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION:
DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII
Phyllis Dunton, Attorney
General's Office, Environmental
Control Division
/)
RI
RIII
RIII
RIII
RIII
g
09@ndsman
.se
Axelson Enclosure contains
Pi
e/ld
freed
l6(MD
J
SAFEGUARDS LUFCRMATICR
S[2
C
08/25/85
[Uponseparationthis
as
,
t . . - r m , '- -W.
page is Decontrolled
O ,,
m . ,, - , ,
ciu wu, .. .~
- . . . . . . ~ ' '
...
,