ML20126A052
| ML20126A052 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/07/1985 |
| From: | Vandewalle D CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8506130211 | |
| Download: ML20126A052 (70) | |
Text
F1
@ Consumem pow 8f David J VendeWelle Director of Company
,., m_,.,
General offices: 1946 West Parnell Road, Jackson, MI 49201 (517) 788-1636 June 7, 1985
- Director,
' Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-155 - LICENSE DPR BIG RCCK POINT PLAliT - PROPOSED OPERATING LICENSE CHANGE REQUEST - INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT Attached are three (3) originals and thirty-seven conformed copies of a request for change to the Big Rock Point Operating License. The attached proposed change incorporates the requirement to adhere to the " Plan for the Big Rock Point Integrated Assessment" into Facility Operating License DPR-20.
The " Plan" is provided in Attachment 2, and a listing of Integrated Assessment Issue Groups A and B issues and issue resolutions is given in Attachment 3.
Pursuant to 10CFR170.21, a check in the amount of $150 is attached.
M avid andeWalle Director, Nuclear Licensing CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Big Rock Point Attachments 8506130211B"g,.7a' p#g a=caa
- =
t og egeet p/
W OC0585-0017A-NLO2
T J
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Docket 50-155 Request for Change to the Facility Operating License License DPR-6
. For the reasons hereinaf ter set forth, it is requested' that-the Facility Operating License DPR-6, Docket 50-155, issued to Consumers Power Company on
- May 1, 1964, for the Big Rock Point Plant be changed as described in Section I below:
I.
~ Add 7.
The " Plan for the Big Rock Point Integrated Assessment" (the Plan) submitted on June 7, 1985 is approved, a)
The Plan'shall be followed by the licensee from and after the effective date of this amendment.
b)
Changes to dates for completion of issues identified in Issue Group B of the Plan do not require a license amendment.
Dates specified in Issue Group A shall be changed only in accordance with applicable NRC procedures.
II.
Discussion In a March 18, 1983 letter to the NRC, Consumers Power Company com-mitted to conduct a comprehensive integrated assessment of all open issues (both regulatory and non-regulatory) for the Big Rock Point Plant, and to develop a "living schedule" for resolution of the issues included in this integrated assessment. The basic objective of this program is to enable Consumers Power Company to obtain better control and management of available resources and to perform required activi-ties in a canner which would enhance plant safety by (1) using results from probabilistic risk assessment analyses, (2) improved control of safety-related modifications, and (3) more promptly implementing these modifications. By letter dated June 1, 1983, Consumers Power Company submitted a description of the integrated assessment and scheduling approach, and the resulting schedule for issue resolution. Three updates have subsequently been submitted on-February 2, 1984, and August-14, 1984 and February 12, 1985.
This proposed license change request and associated Plan establishes the method by which the NRC and Consumers Power will implement the Big Rock Point Plant Integrated Assessment. The Plan describes the respon-sibilities and requirements associated with integrating issues initiated by the NRC or Consumers Power Company into the Integrated Assessment. 'The format and content of this Plan closely follows that of previously approved plans (eg, Duane Arnold Energy Center Amendment No. 91 and Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Amendment No. 75). The Big Rock Point Plant: Integrated Assessment is different from these other plans in that the resolution of NRC or Consumers Power Company
. TSB0585-0017C-NLO2
.i
o 8:
r 2
initiated issues, as well as the schedule,'is. included in the assess-ment process'via evaluation by.the Big Rock Point Technical Review Group.- Therefore,-both the issue resolution and the completion schedule can be topics:of discussion and negotiation between Consumers Power Company and the NRC.
In addition, only those issue resolutions which meet or exceed established threshold criteria are considered within-the framework of this Plan. The Plan proposed here reflects this-expanded scope.
The Big Rock Point Plant Integrated Assessment program is based on an-assessment and computer-generated completion schedule of over 100 issues._- These issues were then divided into two issue groups.
Issue Group A is composed of issue resolutions and schedules established by
' existing rule, order, or license condition. Issue Group B is comprised of:
'1)
Regulatory issues (of either a generic or plant specific nature)
' identified by the NRC which have resolutions and/or completion dates requested by the and/or committed to by Consumers Power Company, and which would result in either a) plant modifications,
.b) procedure revisions, or c) changes in facility staffing requirements, and; 2)-
All other issues identified by Consumers Power Company or other agencies.
Consumers Power Company requests approval of this proposed license change'to incorporate a license condition requiring that Consumers Power Company follow the Integrated Assessment Plan and permitting us to make changes to the Plan and its issue resolutions and schedules'for certain categories of issues in accordance with the provisions of the Plan summarized below:
1)
Changes to issue resolutions and/or schedules for completion of issues imposed by rule, order,'or license condition (Issue Group A issues):will continue to be sought through the exemption or Order-date extension process.
2)
Issue resolutions and/or schedules for completion of other issues (Issue Group B issues)'are identified and provisions are made in the Plan to require Consumers Power Company to provide the NRC with prior notification of changes to Issue Group B to enable further explanation or discussion of such changes.
3)
Provisions are made in the Plan for incorporating new regulatory
' issues into Issue Groups A and B as these issues are identified by the NRC and/or formalized by rule, order or license condition.
Each !-f the original Integrated Assessment issues has been reviewed and discusse&-by,the NRC in NUREG-0828, " Final Integrated Plant Safety
- Assesvien.t Report for the Big Rock Point Plant," dated May 1984.
This proposed license change to incorporate a condition into the Big
. Rock Point Plant operating license which requires Consumers Power Company to follow the Plan provides an appropriate mechanism to ensure
'TSB0585-0017C-NLO2
3 that the NRC is informed as to whether required safety-related issues are being completed in a timely manner. At the same time, the Plan provides a suitable mechanism for changes to issue resolutions and/or completion dates-(due to unforeseen circumstances) for issues not imposed by rule, order, or license condition and for keeping the NRC l informed of such changes for its consideration. Thus, the degree of flexibility needed to ensure effective program implementation is provided while at the same time ensuring that the NRC's responsibil-ities are not' compromised.
III.
Analysis of No Sianificant Hazards Consideration This proposed change is similar.to example (ii) published in the Federal Register on April 16, 1984 (48FR14870) of the types of license amendments that are considered not likely to involve significant hazards considerations. Example ~ (ii) illustrates a change that consti-tutes an additional limitation, restriction or control not presently included in the license. Consequently, this proposed change does not involve a significant hazards consideration as defined in 10CFR50.92.
IV.
~ Conclusion-The Big Rock Point Plant Review Committee has reviewed this proposed license change request and has determined that this change does not involve an unreviewed safety question and therefore involves no significant hazards consideration. This change has also been reviewed under the cognizance of.the Nuclear Safety Board. A copy of this license change request has been sent to the State of Michigan official designated to receive such applications for amendments to the Operating License.
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY.
/
JnIIV
~
i R B DeWitt, Vice President Nuclear Operations Sworn and subscribed to before me this 7th day o 1985.
9 Au s Ls em.
Sherry L Du ey, Netary P b
Jackson County, Michigan My commission expires November 5, 1986.
SHERRY LYNN DURFEY ary Mc, Jacks &cty, m TSB0585-0017C-NLO2 My Ccmmiden Evires Nov. 5, ISCS o
i ATTACHMENT 1 Consumers Power Company r
Big Rock Point Plant Docket 50-155 Proposed Change to Facility Operating License DPR-6 June 7, 1985 1 Page
-4 Revision 5 dated October 1,1981 (transmitted November 6,1981),
Revision 6 dated October 1,1982 (transmitted November 5,1982);
Revision 7 dated April 15, 1983 (transmitted April 14, 1983);
" Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant Safeguards Contingency Plan", dated July 11, 1980 (transmitted July 24, 1980); and " Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant Suitability Training and Qualification Plan", dated June 26, 1980 (transmitted July 17, 1980), Revision 1 dated October 1,1982 (transmitted November 5,1982) and supplemental Revision I page changes dated October 1, 1982 (transmitted i
June 20, 1983).
(6) a.
The implementation date for the installation of the Big Rock Point recirculation pump trip is deferred until the NRC staff has reviewed those portions of the Big Rock Point Probabilistic Risk Assessment that relate to Anticipated Transients Without Scram.
b.
The licensee shall submit to the NRC by March 1, 1981, all portions of the Probabilistic Risk Assessment that relate to the efficacy of a recirculation pump trip at Big Rock Point.
c.
Before returning the reactor to operation from the 1980 refueling outage, the licensee shall submit the Big Rock Point emergency procedures and training program that relate to the recognition and mitigation of an ATWS event.
(7)
The " Plan for the Big Rock Point Integrated Assessment" (the Plan) submitted on June 7, 1985 is approved.
a.
The Plan shall be followed by the licensee from and after the effective date of the amendment.
b.
Changes to dates for completion of issues identified in Issue Group B of the Plan do not require a license amendment. Dates specified in Issue Group A shall be changed only in accordance with applicable NRC procedures.
D.
This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance and shall expire at midnight, May 31, 2000.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION John A. Zwolinski (Signed)
John A. Zwolinski, Chief Operating Reactor Branch #5 Division of Licensing
Attachment:
Appendix A Technical Specifications l
Date of Issuance: December 10, 1984 l
As Modified by Order Dated October 24, 1980 (Attached Hereto)
Proposed TSB0585-0017E-NLO2
t ATTACIDENT 2 l
Consumers Power Company Big Rock Point Plant Docket 50-155 F
Plan For the Big Rock Point Integrated Assessment June 7, 1985 L
F i
b r
6 6 Pages
)
OC0585-0017A-NLO2 L
PLAN FOR Tile BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT I.
INTRODUCTION Consumers Power Company (CPC) has developed a comprehensive program which will enable the Company to effectively manage implementation of significant changes to our Big Rock Point Plant which have been required, or proposed by, the NRC, as well as other measures to enhance plant safety and reliability which have been identified by the Company or other agencies (eg, the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations). A description of the program, identified as the " Integrated Assessment of Open Issues and Schedule for Issue Resolution (Including Environmental Equipment Qualification and Generic Letter 82-33 Issues)" was submitted to the NRC by our letter dated June 1, 1983.
This program was developed to assess, coordinate and schedule all necessary work at the Big Rock Point Plant, including those mandated or proposed by the NRC, or identified by CPC and others. The program objectives are to (1) satisfy regulatory requirements; (2) provide sufficient lead times for modifications; (3) minimize changes to operators: (4) effectively manage financial and human resources; and (5) specify the framework for changes to developed issue resolutions and associated schedules. This will be accomplished within the overall objective of plant safety and availability.
This program reflects the recognition by CPC and the NRC that fiscal and manpower resources are finite and that a limit on the onsite manpower is necessary. The program integrates a significant portion of presently planned work at the Big Rock Point Plant over a nominal three-year period to ensure that individual issues are properly assessed and that the tasks associated with issue resolution are effectively scheduled and coordinated.
It provides a means for new requirements to be accomma-dated taking into account schedule and resource constraints, as well as the importance of implementing a new requirement. The purpose of this document is to describe the plan used to implement the program.
It describes how the program functions, mechanisms for changing the program and updating it, the interactions and responsibilitics of the NRC and licensee staffs under the program, and its resultant assessments and schedules.
II.
SUMMARY
OF PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT The program is based on a list of issues, their associated resolutions and completion dates, each of which is assigned a priority resulting from an established assessment method. Assessments are performed by the Big Rock Point Plant Technical Review Group (TRG), and the assessment method involves ranking each issue or issue resolution based on its importance relative to safe shutdown, radiological releano potential, personnel safety, and plant availability. The scheduling of issue resolutions takes into account projections for budgets and site manpower and engineering support requirements for three years, on an item-by-item TSB0585-0017D-NLO2
r 2 of.6 l
I basis covering all significant plant modification activities. The list r
l represents that significant portion of the Big Rock Point Plant work
.i list and commitment list which is regularly modified and updated to meet l
changing conditions, including new NRC regulatory requirements..~The ll final product of this program is the assessment of issues or issue resolutions and the development of associated schedules as discussed l
below.
l III. ASSgSSMENT AND SCHEDULING A first step in the development of this program involved a listing of significant open issues and their associated resolutions. In cases where a resolution to a particular open issue was not yet identified, the issue itself was retained in the list. Upon completion of the work i
listing, CPC determined that an assessment of issues or issue resolu-l
(
tions was required to determine their appropriate ranking. Upon TRG-completion of the issue assessment and ranking (using, in some cases, the results of probabilistic risk assessment studies), the tasks associated with each issue resolution were scheduled based on their assigned ranking and using critical path methodology for selected work t
l items. The issues or issue resolutions were organisated into Issue Groups A and B based upon the origin of the issue and its ranking.
Completion schedules identify critical paths in the work effort for each associated task, which in turn enables prompt adaptation of scheduled completion dates to meet contingencies such as strikes, delays in procurement or installation or modification of fuel cycle schedules.
Both Issue Groups are briefly described below:
Issue Group A - All issues which have resolutions and/or' issue resolution implementation dates mandated by NRC rules, orders or license conditions, j
Issue Group B - Issues (of either a generic or plant specific nature) identified by the NRC or CPC which have resolutions and/or completion dates requested by the NRC and/or committed to by CPC, and which would result in either a) plant modifications, b) procedure revisions, or c) changes in facility staffing requirements.
Issue resolutions and/or implementation dates in Issue Group A may be l
modified or deleted only with prior approval of the NRC, in accordance l
with existing NRC procedures.
Changes to the issue resolution and/or l
completion dates in Issue Group B require notification to the NRC as described in Section V.
Issue Groups A and B, taken together, provide a basis for assessing the overall effects of changes to issue resolutions and/or schedules, and a departure point for discussion between the NRC l
l and the licensee regarding such changes, as discussed below.
I i
h TSg0585-0017D-NLO2 t
3 of 6 It should be noted that activities categorized in Issue Group A should not be considered to have any more or less safety. significance than Issue Group B activities. Issue Group A activities simply have a resolution and/or schedule that is " fixed" without prior NRC approval of changes.
IV.
ISSUE RESOLUTION AND SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS An important aspect of CPC's planning effort is the recognition that the issues, issue resolutions, and scheduled completion dates will need to be modified or deleted at times to reflect changes in regulatory requirements, to accommodate those activities that CPC finds necessary to improve plant efficiency and reliability, to incorporate the results of investigations into issues, and to take into account delays resulting from events beyond CPC's control. The procedure used by CPC for chang-ing or deleting issues, issue resolutions, or scheduled completion dates will be developed and included in a separate volume of the Big Rock Point Plant Manuals. g V.
CPC AND NRC RESPONSIBILITIES The proper functioning of the Integrated Plan requires that CPC apply consistent criteria to the assessment of issues, monitor the progress of all work undertaken, manage its activities to maintain the-schedule, and act promptly to take necessary actions when an issue resolution or schedule change is needed.
It also requires that the NRC treat all Integrated Plan issues consistently and recognize that, when necessary, ranking, issue resolutions, and/or scheduled completion date changes are based on a comparison of the issue being changed to all the Integrated Plan issues, and also account for resource constraints.
A.
PERIODIC UPDATING CPC will update Issue Groups A and B semi-annually and submit the revised Integrated Plan to the NRC, beginning six months following NRC approval of this plan. The revised Integrated Plan will include the following:
- Summarize progress in completing or implementing issue resolutions.
- Identify changes since last update report.
- Summarize the reasons for issue resolution and/or schedule changes associated with regulatory requirements.
1 The listing of issues in Issue Groups A and B will contain sufficient detail to identify those issues with tasks and/or completion dates keyed to refueling outages.
In such cases, a change in outage period (ie, initiation or duration) shall not be considered a schedule change.
TSB0585-0017D-NLO2
r 4 of 6 B.
CHANGES TO ISSUE RESOLUTIONS AND/OR SCHEDULES Changes to the Integrated Plan may arise from a variety of reasons.
such as new issues identified; modifications to the scope of scheduled work; unplanned, outages; results of investigations into an issue (eg, PRA findings); problems in delivery, procurement, etc; changes in NRC rules and regulations; or other NRC or CPC a'ctions.
Where it is necessary to add a new issue or to change the schedule for an issue, the following general guidance will be utilized to the j
extent appropriate:
- Assess the priority of the issue relative to all existing Integrated Plan issue resolutions.
- Schedule the new or changed issue resolution to avoid rescheduling-other issues, if it can be reasonably achieved.
- Alter Issue Group B items before Issue Group A items.
- Select a schedule for the new or changed issue resolution which will help in maintaining an optimum integrated program of work.
y Addition of activities to Issue Group A requires CPC to propose appropriate issue resolutions and/or completion dates and requires NRC approval of such proposals.
Changes to previously established Issue Group A resolutions and/or resolution implementation dates 1
will be proposed only after CPC has determined that changing Issue Group B issues will not significantly assist in maintaining Issue Group A without change; or that safety, resource or schedule penalties from rescheduling Issue Group B activities significantly 1
outweigh the consequences of a change in an Issue Group A completion date. As with proposals to add Issue Group A activities, proposals to change previously existing Issue Group A activities also requires NRC approval.
i CPC will inform the NRC Project Manager when serious consideration is given to requesting a change in Issue Group A.
When CPC deter-mines that a change in Issue Group A is necessary, it will submit a
- written request for NRC approval in accordance with applicable procedures.
c Issue resolutions in Issue Group B may be modified, deleted or kl rescheduled, or new issues may be added to Issue B by CPC without E-NRC approval; however, CPC will inform the NRC Project Manager once it has been determined that a change, deletion, or addition is necessary. CPC will provide the NRC with timely written notifica-tion of changes or deletions of Issue Group B issue resolutfons or completion dates associated with NRC initiated issues.
Such nctifi-cation will also include the reasons for the change and describe any
~~
' compensatory actions which CPC determines to be appropriate.
3.-
q N
TSB0585-0017D-NLO2
5 of 6 The change, addition or deletion in Issue Group B will go into effect upon evaluation by the TRG, unless the NRC, in writing, requests further explanation or discussion.
Such a request shall be made in a timely manner.
In this event, discussions will be initi-ated to promptly develop an issue resolution and/or schedule which is mutually acceptable to CPC and the NRC Project Manager while considering overall program impact. The written notification by the NRC will serve to extend the schedule date for the period of time required for such discussion.
If a' revised issue resolution and/or schedule is established in these discussions, such issue resolution and/or schedule will supersede the issue resolution and/or schedule set forth in Issue Group B.
The revised issue resolution and/or schedule will be incorporated in a revised Issue Group B in the next update submitted to the NRC.
If a revised issue resolution and/or schedule cannot be established in these discussions, CPC changes to issue resolutions and/or schedule dates will be effective unless subsequently modified by NRC Order.
In the event of unplanned delays or circumstances beyond CPC's
~
control, CPC shall provide timely notification to the NRC Project Manager of the revised issue resolution and/or schedule date and incorporate it in a revised Issue Group B in the next update submitted to the NRC.
VI.
NRC REVIEW As pointed out in Section V.B above, changes to the issues and/or schedules are inevitable. Action required by the NRC is discussed below:
A.
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY ORIGINATED CHANGES 1.
Upon receipt from CPC of a request for modification of Issue Group A, the NRC will act promptly (consistent with resource availability and priority of other work) to consider and decide on the request in accordance with applicable procedures.
2.
If the request for a modification of Issue Group A is denied, NRC shall promptly inform CPC and provide the reasons for denial.
3.
NRC consideration of CPC changes to non-Issue Group A issues
-and/or schedules is covered by Section V.B.
B.
NRC ORIGINATED CHANGES (ISSUE GROUP A) hat formal NRC regulatory actions (ie, NRC rules, It is recognized t orders, or licent. conditions) may:
(1) impose a new regulatory requirement with a fixed date, or (2) establish a firm date for a
- previously identified regulatory requirement.
In taking any such action, the NRC, to the extent consistent with its overall regulatory responsibilities and, unless public health, safety, or TSB0585-0017D-NLO2
p 6 of 6
-interest require otherwise, will take into account the impact of such action on CPC's ability to complete effectively the issues in Issue Groups A and B, and, in consultation with CPC,.will try to minimize such impact. Although any formal regulatory action (ie, regulatory rule, order, or license condition) taken by the NRC will be~ effective-in accordance with its terms without inclusion in Issue Group A, the NRC and CPC recognize'the desirability of incorporating
-such action into Issue Group A, particularly in order to incorporate at the same time any other appropriate changes in the total inte-grated assessment program. Accordingly, once such formal regulatory action is taken (or earlier, if practicable), the NRC will provide CPC a reasonable opportunity to propose overall changes in the total integrated assessment program which would most effectively accom-modate such requirements. Any resulting changes in issues in Issue Group A will be (1) reviewed by the NRC, taking in account the overall objective of the Integrated Assessment-Program to-use available resources effectively, and (2) approved by the NRC in accordance with established procedures, and will.thereupon be reflected in a revised Issue Group A submitted by'CPC. CPC will inform the NRC of any resulting changes in Issue Group B in accord-ance with Section V above.
C.
NEW NRC ISSUES (ISSUE GROUP B)
The NRC may, from time to time, identify new regulatory issues which may result in (a) plant modifications, (b) procedure revision or development, or (c) changes in facility staffing requirements. With respect to issues which the NRC requests (1) scheduling information or (2) responses by a certain date, these issues may be included in Issue Group B in accordance with the issue resolution priority resulting from the TRG assessment.
Issue resolutions and/or date commitments resulting from TRG evaluation will form the basis for discussions between the NRC and CPC. As for the case of NRC-originated changes to Issue Group A issues, the NRC will provide CPC a reasonable opportunity to propose overall changes in the total integrated plan program which would most effectively accommodate such-issues.- Any resulting changes in the integrated plan program will thereupon be reflected in a revised Issue Group B submitted by CPC.
VII. MODIFICATION TO THE PLAN The' licensee and the NRC recognize that the Plan itself may require
-future modifications. Accordingly, for revisions which are determined to be substantial, CPC will submit these changes for approval. The changes will be made effective upon amendment issuance by the NRC.
TSB0585-0017D-NLO2-
. =.
E' ATTACHMENT 3 Consumers Power Company Big Rock Point Plant Docket 50-155
-Listing of Issue Groups A and B June 7, 1985 4
1 A
f 56 Pages OC0585-0017A-NLO2
,W Wo l
,r f
f i
2i o
l:.
l.
t L
h.
ISSUE GROUP A E
o h
I~
T
?
1 l-i OC0585-0017A-NLO2 u-
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN I
I I
TITLE: RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT TECH SPECS ISSUE MUMBER: 839 i
SCORE: I l
COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW. BY SIJAN86.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
THE LICENSEE'S CURRENT PROPOSALS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE STAFF AND FRAMRLIN RESEARCN CENTER.
THE CONTRACTOR HAS IDENTIFIED ALL VARIANCES FRDMSTAFF GUIDANCE. A MEETING HAS BEEN SET BETWEEN THE HRC STAFF. THE PLANT AND GENERAL OFFICE TO TRY TO RESOLVE THE VARIANCE.(8/24/84 MTG.)
STATUS:
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE REQUEST SUBMITTED ON JANUARY 7, 1985 NRC APPROVAL REQUIRED.
RESOLUTION:
IMPLEMENT RETS.
REFERENCES:
AEMERIC LETTER IPSAR ?ECTION SEP TOPIC 82. MAY 84 5.3.27 8472 LPCO LETTERS TO HRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 92FEB84 07 JAN 85 l
135EP84 13NOV78 31JUL81 INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES DJV 82-111 AIR A-ML-84-62 LLC 84-48
l' i
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: FHSR UPDATE STUDY ISSUE MUMBER: e35B SCORE: 5 COMMITMENT:
IMPLEMENT INDEXING SYSTEM AS SUBSTITUTE FOR FHSR UPDATE BY AUGUST 27, 1986.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
18CFR50.7I(E) REQUIRES THAT POWER REACTORS MAINTAIN AN UPDATED FHSR; THE PURPOSE OF WHICH I5 TO PROVIDE A CURRENT DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANT DESIGH FOR USE BY THE MRC STAFF AMD THE PUBLIC.
STATUS:
DETAI'LS OF CROSS REFERENCING SYSTEM WERE SUBMITTED ON OCTOBER 31, 198h; NRC PRESENTLY REVIEWING PROGRAM.
RESOLUTION:
TRO HAS ELECTED TO DESIGN. IMPLEMENT AND EVALUATE A COMPUTERIZED METHOD OF INDEXING EXISTING DOCUMENTS TO PROVIDE A WORKABLE SUBSTITUTE FOR ASINGLE COMPREHENSIVE REPORT.
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER HUR_ffe IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 10CFR50.7IE 0828, MAY 84 5.3.25.I GEC9_ LETTERS TO MRC DATED HRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02 fen 8' 31 OCT 84 02MAY84 01JUH83 INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER. RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 VJf4 31-83 DPH 84-05 DED 34-02 VJM 03-84
I 1
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT (EEG)
ISSUE NUMBER 836 SCORE: I4 I
l COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW BY 31 MAR 85.
I DESCRIPTION:
ISSUES ASSURE THAT ALL SAFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SUBJECTED TO A HARSH ENVIRONMENT IS ADEQUATELY MAINTAINED.
RESOLUTION:
- 1. FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) WASPERFORMED TO ADDRESS SUALIFICATION FOR CERTAIN i
EQUIPMENT WHOSE SAFETY FUNCTION IS PERFORMED BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT BECOMES HARSH. AGING QUALIFICATI0H IS NOT REQUIRED FOR EQUIPMENT WHICH SUCCESSFULLY PASSES THE FMEA LINCE SAFETY FUNCTIONS ARE PERFORMED BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT BECOMES HARSH AND THE EFFECTS OF FAILURE AFTER l
THE ENVIRONMENT BECOMES HARSH ARE SHOWN TO BE ACCEPTABLE.
- 2. COMPLETE AND AUDITABLE FLUES WILL BE ESTABLISHED FOR FULLY QUALIFIED EQUIPMENT.
- 3. A LIST OF UNGUALIFIED E9UIPMENT WILL BE ESTABLISHED WHICH WILL REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OR ADDI-I TIONAL QUALIFICATION EFFORT.
1
- 4. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN WILL BE ESTABLISHED FOR EQUIPMENT NOT QUALIFIED.
i ANALYSIS OR WHOLESALE REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT.
REGARDING SAFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT THAT WAS MODIFIED DURING THE RECENT 1983 REFUELING OUTAGE, CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY SUBMITTED NEW SYSTEM COMPONEMT EVALUATION WORKSHEETS (SCEW),
APPLICABLE TO THIS EQUIPMENT, ON DECEMBER 15, 1983.
THIS PROGRAM DESCRIBED ABOVE MEETS THE INTENT OFIOCFR53.49 AND SUPERCEDES ALL PREVIOUS EEt i
COMMITMENTS.
{
- 5. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION (JCO) FOR EtUIPMENT WHICH IS NOT FULLY SUALI-FIED AS AN INTERIM MEASURE UNTIL THE EQUIPMENT IS FULLY QUALIFIED.
- 6. AN EXEMPTION REQUEST WILL BE MADE TO EXTEND EEt COMPLETION DATE FROM 3/31/85 TO 11/85 FOR SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT.
- 7. MAINTENANCE AND FACILITY CHANGE ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE EEt PROGRAM WILL BE ESTABLISHED.
- 8. A LIST OF PM ACTIVITIES WILL BE ESTABLISHED.
l l
i
ISSUE NUMBER 036 BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN i
STATUS:
FOLLOWING RESOLUTION; EXPECT EXTENSION REQUEST TO BE SUBMITTED IN FEBRUARY 1985.
i
}
I l
REFERENCE 58 GENERIC LETTER MEEQ IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 84-24 8828. MAY 84 5.3.4 SPC0_ LETTERS TO NRC DATED BRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 01JUN83 18 JUL 84 08AUG84 27 DEC 84 e2FEB84 27 AUG 84 82SEP83 300CT83 10 MAR 83 i
15DEC83 31 OCT 8h 26 MAR 84 l
29eJUN84 07 JAN 85 185EPB4 IBIERNAL ME 5 OTHER RELEVANT REVEREHCII ICS 45-21 A-ML-83-29, A-ML-85-094 KWB 14-83 FEDERAL REGISTER VOL 49, MO 146 i
KAT 11-83 l
JPC 88-84 l
JLK 84-05 JLK 84-95 DJV 84-99 JDW 12-84 JDW 08-84 1
i
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN 1
TITLE ALTERNATE SHUTDOWN SYSTEM j
ISSUE NUMBER: 075A SCORE: 23 COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER MAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
10CFR59, APPENDIX R RE9UIRES SAFE SHUTDOWN CAPABILITY IN THE EVENT OF FIRE.
STATUS:
COMPLETION BY COMMITMENT DATE.
l t
i 4
RESOLUTION THE TRG MAS DECIDED TO INSTALL AN ALTERNATE SHUTDOWN PANEL IN A SEISMIC / FLOOD PROOF BUILDING.
PROCEDURES WILL BE WRITTEM AND TRAINING ON THE PROCEDURES ANO ON THE SHUTDOWN SYSTEM WILL BE PERFORMED.
I i
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER HURig IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC i
l 0828, MAY 84 5.3.2.I CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FEB84 08 MAR 83 02MAY84 j
24 JAN 85 i
I i
i i
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: RADIANT ENERGY SHIELDS ISSUE NUMBER: 075B SCORE: 9 COMhITRENT: CONSUMERS POWER MAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE l
i DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
DRAFT IPSAR (NUREG 0828) SECTION 5.3.I4.2 REGUIRES I. A RADIANT ENERGY SHIELD (SHEET METAL) BETWEENTHE EMERGENCY CONDENSER OUTLET VALVE CONDUITS S RDS CONDUITS AND VALVES.
- 2. A RADIANT ENERGY SHIELD BETWEEN ONE EMERGENCYCONDENSER INLET VALVE AND RDS VALVES ON THE EMER GENCY CONDENSER DECK.
STATUS:
COMPLETION BY COMMITMENT DATE.
RESOLUTION:
THE TRG MAS ELECTED TO:
- 1. INSTALL RADIANT ENERGY SHIELD ON THE EMERGENCY CONDENSER DECK.
l
- 2. REQUEST EXEMPTION FOR RADIANT ENERGY SHIELD ON THE DRUM WALL.
I REFERENCES GENERIC LETTER HMRfD IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC j
0828, MAY 84 5.3.14.2 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FE884 02MAY84 25 JAN 85 i
]
i:
1
1 BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN i
TITLE: ASSOCIATED CIRCUITS ISSUE NUMBER: 975C l
SCORE: 8 l
COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY l
THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE i
l DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
IOCFRSS, APPENDIX R, REGUIRES THAT SAFE SNUTDOWNE9UIPMENT BE ISOLATED FROM ASSOCIATED CIRCUITS SUCH THAT HOT SHORTS, SHORTS TO GROUND, OR OPEN CIRCUITS WILL NOT PREVENT OPERATION OF THE SAFE SHUTDOWN EQUIPMENT.
STATUS:
COMPLETE BY COMMITMENT DATE.
i I
RESOLUTION:
I. THE TRS HAS ELECTED TO: DEVELOP PROCEDURES FOR NUMEROUS VALVES AND ONE PUMP TO DETERMIME IF j
MALOPERATION HAS OCCURRED DUE TO THE FIRE. THEY WOULD THEN ADDRESS THE REPAIR OF THE EQUIPMENT; IE, MAINLY DISCONNECTING CIRCUITRY AND OPERATINGVALVES MANUALLY.
l
- 2. REROUTE ONE WIRE (THE CLOSE COIL WIRE) FRDM EACH OF THE TWO CIRCUITS WITH THE REST OF THE 1
ALTERNATE SHUTDOWN CIRCUITS FROM THE CONTROL ROOM TO THE EMERGENCY CONDENSER DECK. THIS PREVENTS 1
THE POSSIBLITY OF 5HORTS CLOSING THE VALVES FOR FIRES IN THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ROOM, PEMETRA-TION AREAS, ETC.
REFERENCES:
SEMERIC LETTER NUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 5.3.14.1 1-i CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 1
02FE884 02MAY84 i;-
h l
1
(
I h
E ai i
s 3-I-
1 i
)
i i
ISSUE GROUP B i
3 s
h i-f E-
)
l
- y. =
1-w l
t P
1 i
i hi i
e a
k OC0585-0017A-NLO2 s
e
1 BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW ISSUE NUMBER 005 SCORE: 11 l
COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 30JULS5.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
PORTIONS OF SUPPLEMENT I TO MUREG-0737 CONCERN THE REVIEW OF THE ADEOUACY OF THE CONTROL ROOM DESIGN AND OF THE EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES. THE REVIEW WILL ATTEMPT TO DEMONSTRATE WHETHER AN EFFECTIVE MAN-MACHINE INTERFACE WILL EXIST IN THE BIG ROCK POINT CONTROL ROOM DURING ACCIDENT CONOITIONS.
STATUS:
DUE TO MANPOWER REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION AND DELAYS IN
)
COMPLETION OF SYMPTOM ACTION SETS AND ADDING ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES TO RE-LABEL DEMARCATE AND i
REMIMIC AS NECESSARY THE PROJECT COMPLETION HAS SLIPPED AND PRESENTLY COMPLETION IS TARGETED l
FOR OCTOBER 31, 1985 RE50LUTIOM8 CONSUMERS POWER IS COMMITTED TO PERFORMING A DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW AT THE BIG ROCK POINT PLANT.
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER HURES IP5AR SECTION SEP TOPIC i
0828, MAY 84 5.3.2.3 0700
]
0737 I.D.I l
CPCO LETTERS TO HRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED I2FEB84 19APR83 11 NOV 8h I4AUG84 025EP83 OIJUll83 22 JAN 85 INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 A-ML-83-096 I-1 i
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN 4
TITLE: SAFETY PARAMETER DISPLAY SYSTEM ISSUE NUMBER: nO6 SCORE:
COMMITMENT: MOHE AT THIS TIME.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
INSTALL A SPDS TO COMPLDIENT.NEW E0P'S OR JUSTIFY CURRENT CONTROL ROOM DISPLAY.
STATUS:
THE NEED FOR SPDS WILL BE DETERMINED DURING THE CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW.
RESOLUTION:
JUSTIFY CURRENT CONTROL ROOM DISPLAY.
I
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER HMgg(I.D.2)
IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0731 0828, MAY 84 5.4.12 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED HRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 14AUG84 22 JAN 85
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: INSTALL ATION OF TELLTALE 5 ON SHUTDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER ISSUE MUMBER: 009A SCORE: 4 COMMITMENT
- CONSUMERS POWER NAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY j
THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
REACTOR ow0 LING WATER RELIEF VALVE FAILURE RESULTS IN UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE.
TIME SPENT BY THE OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT PURSUINGTHE SOURCE OF LEAKAGE MAY BE BETTER SPENT IN FIXING THE LEAK.
STATUS:
ON SCHEDULE RESOLUTION:
A5 A RESULT OF THE REACTOR COOLING WATER PRESSURE STUDY, THE TRG MAS DECIDED TO INSTALL TELLTALE ON DISCHARGE LINE OF REACTOR COOLING WATER RELIEF VALVES TO ENABLE DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC l
RELIEF VALVE LEAKAGE.
I REFERENCES GENERIC LETTER NUREG IP54R SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 5.2.2.2 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 07NOV83 02FEB84 I4AUG84 4
inif9NAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 RJA A3-15 PRC MEETING MINUTES 15-81 THROUGH 8-83 WJT 32-04 4
WJT 33-01
~
GLF 33-46 1
J BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN i
i TITLE: RUCKER SYSTEM l
ISSUE NUMBER
- 811 SCORE 21 i
COMMITMENTS CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 31JAN85.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE THE TRUBINE BYPASS VALVE ELECTR0 HYDRAULIC CONTROL (EHC) SYSTEM IS UNRELIABLE. OCCASIONALLY THE VALVE FAILS TO OPERATE PROPERLY DURING START-UP (THE VALVE CYCLES OPEN AND CLOSED), AND DURING POWER OPERATION (THE VALVE FAISL TO OPEN OR INADVERTENTLY OPENS). FAILURE OF THE VALVE TO OPEN l
DURING OPERATION RESULTS IN A LOSS OF THE FULL-POWER MAIN HEAT SINK FOR THE PRIMARY COOLANT l
SYSTEM & MAY RESULT IN A HEEDLESS PLANT TRIP.
I STATUS:
SCHEDULE DELAY DUE TO MANPOWER NEEDS OF THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION-PROJECT i
REVISED SCHEDULE DUE OCTOBER 1, 1985 l
1 RESOLUTION:
THE TRG HAS ELECTED TO CONDUCT A STUDY TO IDENTIFY THE FREGUENCY AND TYPE OF MALFUNCTION. THE STUDY IS INTENDED TO AID IN THE DETERMINATION OF*WHICH SPECIFIC PORTION OF THE EHC SYSTEM IS l
MALFUNCTIONING.
i 4
REFERENCES:
I REHERIC LETTER HU M IELAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828 MAY 84 5.3.3.1 CPCO LETTERS TO HRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 1
02FEB84 31 JAN 85 j
I4AUG84 25 FEB 85 I-1 JHIERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVAMI_ REVERENCES i
LER 84-10 PROJECT 428 LER 84-12 i
l i
I I
i 1
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN i
TITLE: SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 4
1 ISSUE MUMBER: SI4 l
SCORE: 18 i
I COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 3IMAY85.
i DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
THE NRC HAS RE4UIRED SEISMIC REREVIEW OF BIG ROCK POINT DESIGN AND UPGRADES OR BACKFITS WHERE APPROPRIATE.
.)
l STATUS:
COMPLETION IS EXPECTED BY COMMITMENT DATE
)
i RESOLUTION:
USING A COMBINATION OF DETERMINISTIC ANALYSIS AND FRA LOGIC MODELS, IDENTIFY SEISMIC " WEAK-LINKS I
IN BIG ROCK POINT DESIGN. AS A FIRST STEP. THE FOLLOWING SHOUDL BE PERFORMED AS IDENTIFIED IN j
CONSUMERS POWER'S LETTER TO NRC DATED JUNE 1, 1983.
I. TO ENSURE AN ATWS IS UNLIKELY, EVALUATION IDENTIFYING THE WEAK LINKS ON THE REACTOR INTERNALS IS REGUIRED 8 AN EVALUATION ENSURING THAT THE CRDM DISCHARGE PIPING DOES NOT CRIMP IS NECESSARY
- 2. COMPLETE THE CABLE TRAY EVALUATIONS BEING PERFORMED BY THE SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OWNERS GROUP AND ASCERTAIN WHETHER SEISMIC DEPENDENCIES EXISTBETWEEN POWER SUPPLIES AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS IN THE ROUTING OF CABLE TRAYS AND CONDUIT.
l
- 3. INSPECT VALVES M07059, MO7953, 8 M07063 TO ENSURE THAT THE VALVE OPERATORS WILL NOT IMPACT SURROUNDING STRUCTURES IF MOTION OCCURS DURING AN EARTH 9UAKE.
- 4. EVALUATE OR RESTRAIN THE MOTION OF MO7078 M07051, 8 M07061 TO ENSURE THE MOTORS DO NOT IMPACT SURROUNDING STRUCTURES IF MOTION OCCURS DURING AN EARCH9UAKE.
- 5. PLACE A MECHANICAL BLOCK ON THE CLEAN-UP DEMINERALIZER HOIST TO ENSURE IT CANNOT TRAVEL OVER THE ENCLOSURE SPRAY VALVES.
- 6. CREATE A REPORT DOCUMENTING THE ABOVE WORK AND MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING FURTHER l
SEISMIC UPGRADING.
j REFERENCES GENERIC LETTER NUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 4.I2 III-6 CPCO LETTERS TO MRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02 FEB 84 01 JUN 83
I BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: SECONDARY SYSTEM INSTABILITIES ISSUE NUMBER: 016 SCORE 19 COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER MAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE DESCRIPTION:
3 ISSUE:
PRIMARY COOLANT SYSTEM (PCS)' MAKEUP MUST BE ASSURED FOLLOWING LOAD REJECTION.
FOLLOWING A 1
LOAD REJECTION, THE PCS WILL BLOW DOWN THROUGH THE TURBINE BYPASS VALVE TO THE CONDENSER HOT WELL. AS A RESULT, THE HOT WELL LEVELS SWELLCAUSING A SIGNAL TO OPEN THE REJECT VALVE OPENS, A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE CONDENSATE PUMP DISCHARGE IS DIVERTED FROM THE SUCTION OF THE REACTOR FEED PUMPS TO THE CONDENSATE STORAGETAMK. THE LOSS OF FEED PUMP SUCTION RESULTS IN A FEED PUMP TRIP AND THUS THE LOSS OF PCS MAKEUP DURING THE BLOWDOWN CONDITION. A LOSS OF PCS INVENTORY COULD RESULT IN LOW PRIMARY SYSTEMWATER LEVEL THAT SUBSE9UENTLY RESULT 5 IN AUTOMATIC DEMANDS ON ENGINEERED SAFETY SYSTEMS.
a RESOLUTION:
MODIFY THE EXISTING REJECT VALVE CONTROL CIRCUITRY SO THAT VALVE OPENING DOES NOT RESULT IN A LOSS OF PRIMARY SYSTEM MAKEUP.
STATUS:
PROJECT DELAY DUE TO MANPOWER REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE PROTECTION MODIFICATIONS. NEW CCMPLETION j
DATE IS EXPECTED TO BE END OF 1986 REFUELING OUTAGE.
REFERENCES GENERIC LETTER NUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 5.3.3.2 6
CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED J
B2FEB84 j
I4AUG84 OIJUN83
~
9 r
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN 4
TITLE: PCS ISOLATION - PC SYSTEM l
ISSUE NUMBER: 817 SCORE: 13 i
i COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE l
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT (PRA) HAS SHOWN THAT A LOSS OF REACTOR COOLANT THROUGN THE PRI-l MARY COOLANT SYSTEM (PCS) DRAIN AND VENT LINES HAS A PROBABILITY OF 2 X 10-3 PER YEAR. CORE i
DAMAGE PROBABILITY OF SUCH AN EVENT IS 7 X 10-5 PER YEAR.
STATUS:
MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AND MODIFICATION PACKAGES PREPARED; COMPLETION BY COMMITMENT DATE IS EXPECTED.
i
+
RESOLUTION:
THE TRG ELECTED TO REVIEW PCS PSIDS TO DETERMINETHE LOCATION OF LINES WITH SINGLE ISOLATION AND TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL ISOLATIDH DEVICE.
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER MUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC l
0828, MAY 84 5.3.18 I
CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TP CPCO DATED i
02FEB84 i
j 14AUG84 INTERNAL MEMOS RIMER RELEVANT REVERENCES 1
FC-575 I
~
1 e
4 4
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAM 4
TITLE: HIGH PRESSURE RECYCLE ISSUE NUMBER: 018 SCORE: I6 COMMITMENT: MONE AT THIS TIME l
DESCRIPTION ISSUE:
UNDER CERTAIM CONDITIONS (FAILURE OF MAIN AND EMERGENCY CONDENSERS), PCS PRESSURE WILL INCREASE THE PCS SAFETY VALVES SET POINT.
AS THE PCS SAFETY VALVES CYCLE OPEN AND CLOSED, MATER 8 STEAM WILL ENTER CONTAINMENT. MATER LEVEL INSIDE CONTAINMENT WILL RISE TO DESIGN LIMITS UNLESS CHECKED l
CURRENTLY, THERE IS NO PROCEDURE WHICH ADDRESSESHOW TO STOP THIS RISE OF H2O INSIDE CONTAINMENT WITHOUT USE OF THE RDS.
t STATUS:
ANALYSIS DISCUSSED IN RESOLUTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. E0PS WILL BE UPDATED CONSISTENT WITH E0P UPGRADE, ISSUE 32.
RESOLUTION:
THE TRS HAS ELECTED TO ENSURE THAT THE EMERGENCYOPERATINS PROCEDURES INCLUDE A PROCEDURE WHICH j
INSTRUCTS THE OPERATOR TO UTILIZE THE POST-INCIDENT COOLING SYSTEM TO RECIRCULATE THE MATER DE-POSITED IN CONTAINMENT INTO THE CONDENSER HOT WELL THROUGH THE HIGH-PRESSURE FEEDWATER PUMPS AND i
FROM THERE TO THE PRIMARY C00 LAND SYSTEM.
THE TEMPERATURES, PRESSURES, FLOWS 8 HENCE STRESSES IN THE AFFECTED SYSTEMS WOULD BE E9UIVALENT i
OR LESS THAM THOSE ASSOCIATED WITH THESE SYSTEMSAS THEY ARE DESIGNED TO DEPRATE. BECAUSE OF POTENTIAL RADIONUCLIDES IN THE CONTAINMENT SUMP.A RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS IDENTIFYING THE NUCLIDE l
CONCENTRATION ABOVE WHICH HIGH-PRESSURE RECYCLE SHOULD NOT BE PLACED IN SERVICE HAS BEEN IDENTI-j FIED. THIS ANALYSIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED 8 ITSRECOMMENDATIONS ARE 10 BE INCORPED INTO EOPS.
REFERENCES:
l GENERIC LETTER MMRES IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 5.3.I.2 1
CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED f
92FER84 INIERNAL MEMOS RIH _ER_ RELEVANT REVERENCES DPB 83-06 PRA APPENDIX XI l
l
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: ORGANIC MATERIALS (WALL COATINGS)
ISSUE HUMBER: 022A SCORE: 13 i
C0fmITMENT: NONE AT THIS TIME DESCRIP_IIOM:
ISSUE:
IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10CFR59(GDC1) AND APPENDIX 3. LICENSEES SHOULD ENSURE THAT PROTECTIVE COATINGS
-l INSIDE THE CONTAIMMENT DO NOT CONSIST OF MATERIAL THAT COULD CREATE A HAZARDOUS ENVIRONMENT OR i
CAUSE MATERIAL FAILURE BY BLOCKAGE OF SCREENS & SPRAY N0ZZLES.
THE LICENSEE SHOULD DEMONSTRATE THAT COATINGS USED ARE GUALIFIED FOR DBA CONDITIONS & WILL NOT CLOG RECIRCULATION SCREENS. THE LICENSEE SHOULD ALSO HAVE A FORMAL PROGRAM FOR PERIODIC INSPECTION OF COATINGS INSIDE CONTAINMNT STATUS:
TEST RESULTS AND SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM WERE SUBMITTED JANUARY 18, 1985 REQUIRES NRC REVIEW.
RESOLUTION:
PLANT SAMPLES FORM SURFACES INSIDE CONTAINMENT ARE BEING TESTED TO DETERMIME IF THEY WILL ADHERE UNDER ACCIDENT CONDITIONS.
FURTHER ACTION WILL BE DETERMINED AFTER TESTING IS COMPLETE.
l l
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER NUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 4.19.1 VI-1
=
CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED i-e2FEf184 18 JAN 85 l
02MAY84 j
1RIERNAL MEMOS 91tLER RELEVANT REVERENCES 1
ISSUE 104 1
l BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN
?
TITLE: BALANCE OF PLANT 4A PLAN DEVELOPMENT ISSUE NUMBER: 023 SCORE: 4 i
COFMITMENT: NOME AT THIS TIME.
I i
DESCRIPTION:
j 1
ISSUE:
IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO MAVE A GUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN FOR BALANCE OF PLANT E4UIPMENT.
i
)
STATUS:
INACTIVE DUE TO LACK OF RESOURCES.
I f
v RESOLUTION:
A NEM PROGRAM MILL BE DEVELOPED, ALTHOUSN NO MONEY 15 BUDGETED FOR THIS PROGRAM IN 1984. THE i
TRG WILL RANK THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMWNEN IT IS DEVELOPED.
THE PROGRAM RE4UIRES: 13 A DEFINITION OF RELIABILITY-RELATED E9UIPMENT AND 2) A DETERMINATION OF j
THE EXTENT OF 9-CONTROLS TO BE PLACED ON THE BALANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT.
REFERENCES:
j 91NERIC LETTER HUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 5.3.21 1
RNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 6
N 83-15 PROJECT 394 1981 IMPO AUDIT i
RELIABILITY ASSURANCE PROG STUDY REPORT 8/31/82 i
I S
4
i BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE MIND ANO TORNADO LOAD AND TORNADO MISS - SEP TOPIC III-2 AND III-4.A ISSUE NUMBER: 825
{
SCORE IS COMMITMENT: NOME AT THIS TIME DESCRIPTION:
ISSUEt THE NRC HAS RE9UIRED REVIEW OF THE EFFECTS OF HIGH MINDS AND TORNADO LOADINGS AND UPGRADES OR BACKFITS WHERE APPROPRIATE.
STATUS:
NRC REVIEWING ISSUE.
RESOLUTION:
PRA MAS USED TO DETERMINE PROBABILISTIC INFORMATION RESARDING NION WINDS S TORNADOS. CONSUMERS POWER WILL CONTINUE AIDING THE NRC IN EVALUATINGAND REVIEWING THIS INFORMATION. A RESPONSE FROM THE NRC WAS EXPECTED IN MARCH 1984. RESOLUTION OF THIS ISSUE MAY BE AIDED BY INSTALLATION OF THE ALTERNATE SHUTDOWN PANEL IN A TORMADO-PROOF BUILDING l
REFERENCES l
GENERIC LETTER IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC i
82, MAY 84 4.5 III-2 4.8 III-4.A
/
CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED i
j 97 MAYS 3 17MAY84 83AUG82 99DEC82 16 MAR 83 29NOV82 17DEC89 I
INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES JENK 92-83 A-BRP-85-28 DPB 83-05 j
i i
i i
e
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: DEFINITION OF OPERABILITY ISSUE NUMSER: 03I i
SCORE: 3 COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 39JUM84.
DESCRIPTION:
i ISSUE:
IPSAR (NUREG 0828) TABLE 5.2 LIST BIG ROCK POINT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS. THE NRC SUGGEST5 THAT CONSUMERS POWER INCLUDE A DEFINITION OF OPERABILITY IN THE BIG ROCK POINT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION (LCO) FOR MULTIPLE TRAIN SYSTEMS AND INCLUDE LCO'S FOR ITEMS LISTEDON IN TABLE 5.2.
STATUS:
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE REQUEST SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 1h, 198h AND REVISION SUBMITTED JANUARY 17, 1985 NRC APPROVAL REQUIRED.
l RESOLUTION:
A TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE WAS PREPARED AND APPROVED BY THE 5ARB.
LCO'S ARE BEING DEFINED FOR ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD SYSTEMS FOR WHICH LCO'5DO NOT EXIST FOR MULTIPLE TRAIN IMOPERABILITY IN THE EXISTING SPECIFICATIONS.
THE REVISED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION IS INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL.
4 i
j
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER NUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 5.3.24 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED i-02FEB84 14 NOV 84 10APR80
$2M 17 JAN 85 UG8 31MAY33 INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 DED 34-02 I
i
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURE UPGRADE ISSUE NUMBER: 832 SCORE 17 CorW9ITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER MAS COMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE. AS DESCRIBED BELOW. BY 31MAY86.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE SECTION 5.3.2.2 0F IPSAR (NUREG 0828). THE NRC REC 0fftENDS THAT CONSUMERS POWER:
- 1. PREPARE PLANT-SPECIFIC PROCEDURES THAT IN GENERAL CONFORM TO EMERGENCY PROCEDURE GUIDELINES 8 IMPLEMENT THESE PROCEDURES A5 OUTLINED IN SUPPLEMENT I TO MUREG-8737 TRANSMITTED BY GENERIC LETTER MO 82-33 DATED DECEMBER 17. 1982.
- 2. PREPARE SUPPLEMENTS TO THE GUIDELINES THAT COVER CHANGES. NEW ESUIPMENT OR NEW KNOWLEDGE AND INCORPORATE THESE SUPPLEMENTS INTO PLANT-SPECIFIC PROCEDURES.
STATUS:
INTERIM MILESTONES HAVE SLIPPED DUE TO LACK OF MANPOWER AND SLIPPAGE IN COMPLETION OF SYMPTOM ACTION SETS. COMPLETION BY COMMITMENT DATE IS STILL EXPECTED.
RESOLUTION:
PLANT-SPECIFIC TECHNICAL SUIDELINES. A TRAINING PACRAGE. A WRITER'S GUIDE AND A VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION PROGRAM MILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE MRC.THE TECHNICAL GUIDELINES AND WRITER'S GUIDE WILL BE USED TO UPGRADE PLANT EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES. VERIFICATION & VALIDATION PROGRAM WILL BE ACHIEVED BY: 1) AUDITING THE UPGRADE PROCEDURES AGAINST THE WRITER'S GUIDE AND PLANT-SPECIFIC TECHNICAL GUIDELINES AND 2) CONDUCTING CONTROL ROOM WALK-THROUGHS AND 3) TRAINING & TESTING THE OPERATORS ON THE PROCEDURES.
REFERENCES GENERIC LETTER IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 7 7 I.C.I 5.3.3.3 9828, MAY 84 5.3.3.2 82-33 0737. SUP I O
CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED
$1JUN83 02FEB84
~
n
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING ISSUE HUMBER: 034 SCORE: I COMMITMENT: NOME AT THIS TIME DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
IPSAR (NUREG 88283 SECTION 5.3.5.3 STATES THAT CONSUMERS POWER INTENDS TO INCREASE BIG ROCK CONTROL ROOM COOLING TO IMPROVE OPERATOR COMFORTDURING SUPMER MONTHS.
i STATUS:
THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO PROVIDE A CROSS TIE FROM THE WELL WATER SYSTEM TO THE SERVICE WATER SYSTEM IS EXPECTED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR SUMMER 1985 RESOLUTION:
THE TRG MAS ELECTED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL AIR CONDITIONING COOLING CAPACITY TO THE CONTROL ROOM.
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER HVRig IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 5.3.5.3 CPCS LETTERS TO NRC DATED HRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED p
82FE884 02 noy 8h INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES RMK 03-84 PROJECT 372 FC-545 A-BRP-81-I7
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD CONSIDERATIONS ISSUE NUMBER
- 037 I.
SCORE: 8 ComITMENT*
THIS ISSUE IS C0liSIDERED RESOLVED PENDING ISSUANCE OF THE APPROVED PROCEDURE REVISIONS.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
FLOODING OF THE SCREENNOUSE OR TURBINE BUIDLING, KNOCKING SERVICE WATER PUMPS OUT OF ORDER, NECESSITATES TAKING CERTAIN ACTIONS TO EMSURE SAFE SNUTDOWN.
STATUS:
PROCEDURES REVISED TO INCORPORATE OPERATOR ACTIONS FOR FLOODING OF EITHER SCHEENHOUSE OR TURBINE BUILDING. SEE ISSUE 87 ALSO.
i l
RESOLUTION:
DEVELOP FLOOD PROCEDURES.
l l
l REFERENCES
0828, MAY 84 4.2.2 11-3.8 II-3.B.I CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 260CT82 22 MAR 82 j
I INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES 9A05 472-84 ISSUE 87 I
i
s
'$ ~ ~
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN
/
s q
p
/
W: VERIFICATION OF,BStB VALVE DATA ISSUE NUMBER:l044
,;g i;'
4 SCORE: 8 f
.$ 'rl E.Q M ITMENT: MONE AT TNIS TIME
[p15CRIPTION:
ISSUE:
DUR7MG PLANT DESIGN REVIEWS WHICM WERE CONDUCTEDAS A PART OF THE LICENSEE'S PRA. SOME BSSR s'
AIKOPERATED VALVES WERE FOUND TO HAVE OPENING AND CLOSING PRESSURE SETTINGS WHICM DIFFERED t
' FROM -MTRUMENT DATA. THIS ISSUE CONSISTS OF GATHERING ACCURATE AND RELIABLE DATA ON EXISTING PLAKi $YONEMETS FOR GETTING THE BEST PERFORMANCE DUT OF THE VALVES AND MAINTAINING THEM EFFICla'OY.
SUFFICIENT TESTING 15 DONE TO INSURE COMPONENTS ASSOCI ATED WITN CORE COOLING OR
.' 'i f CONTA%+it #T ISOLATION FUNCTION PROPERLY.
4 STATUS:
FOLLC s F DLUTION RESOLUTION:
OBTAIM DATA AS VALVES ARE, WORKED ON DUE TO ALARACONSIDERATIONS.
REFERENCES:
CENERIC LETTER NUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 5.3.17 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED t
02FEB84 o
02Mr.Y84
+
02 NOV 8h INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES PROJECT 422 a
i 4
\\
t
+
b-31 BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE ECCS TEST TERMINAL-BOX ISSUE NUMBER: 845 SCORE: 8 COMMITMENT: MONE AT THIS TIME DESCRIPTION:
l ISSUE:
ISC EFFICIENCY CONCERN. PRESENTLY. TECHNICIANS MUST OPEN PRESSURE SWITCNES TO ACTUATE CORE SPRAY IMITIATION SIGNAL TO PERFORM TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TESTING.
1 STATUS:
LOW RANKING, NO SCHEDULE DEVELOPED.
RESOLUTION MODIFY ECCS TEST TERMINAL BOX TO FACILITATE TESTING OF CORE SPRAY ACTUATION CIRCUITS.
REFERENCES
- INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 PROJECT 214 k
1 BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CLEAN-UP DEMIMERALIZER SYSTEM PUMP REPLACEMENT INVESTIGATION ISSUE MUMBER: 648 SCORE: 14 i
COMMITMENT NOME. THIS ISSUE IS CONSIDERED RESOLVED.
DESCRIPTION:
1 ISSUE THE CLEAN-UP DEINIERALIZER SYSTEM IS RERUIRED FOR-CONTINUOUS FULL POWER OPERATION OF BIG ROCK.
2 THE PUMP NAS EXPERIENCED FRERUENT MOTOR CASE EROSION.
RESOLUTION:
A STUDY MAS CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE MNETHER TO REPLACE THE PUMP MITH A DESIGN MORE SUITABLE FOR OPERATING CONDITIONS OR TO PROVIDE A BYPASS AROUND THE PUMP.
l THIS ISSUE IS FURTMER ADDRESSED IN ISSUE 48A.
l l
REFERENCES:
I GENERIC LETTER M
R SECTION SEP TOPIC j
8828, MAY 84
.9.1 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 14AUG84 02FEB84 i
INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES I
ISSUE 48A l
PROJECT 415 SST-25 l
EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION 85-182-82-009 i
4
4 1
]
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CLEAMUP DEMIMERALIZER SYSTEM PUMP BYPASS ISSUE NUMBER: 048A SCORE: 16
}
COMITMENT: NOME AT THIS TIME DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
THE CLEAN-UP DEMIMERALIZER SYSTEM IS RE9UIRED F OR CONTINUOUS FULFL POWER OPERATION OF BIG ROCK.
]
THE PUMP NAS EXPERIENCED FREQUENT MOTOR CASE EROSION.
i i
STATUS:
MODIFICATION WILL NOT BE SCHEDULED UNTIL AFTER 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE.
RESOLUTION:
THE TRG MAS DETERMINED THAT A BYPASS OF THE CLEAN-UP DEMINERALIZER SYSTEM PUMP SHOULD BE INSTALLED.
i l
i i
REFERENCES:
I GENERIC LETTER NUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 1
0828, MAY 84 5.3.9.1
)
CPCO LETTERS TO MRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 14AUG84 I
~
i J
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: MSIV BACKUP VALVES - LEAK TESTING l
ISSUE NUMBER: 950AI SCORE: 14 j
i COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER MAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
A NYDR0 STATIC TEST AT THE END OF OUTAGES, MMICH MAY IMPACT PLANT AVAILABILITY. IS THE ONLY MEANS OF TESTING THE MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE AND MAIN STEAM DRAIN LINE VALVE.
STATUS:
MANPOWER RESOURCES WILL CAUSE THIS PROJECT TO BE DELAYED PAST THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE.
A NEW COMMITMENT DUE DATE WILL BE ESTABLISHED LATER.
I l
RESOLUTION:
THE TRG MAS ELECTED TO PERFORM MODIFICATIONS TO PERMIT AIR TESTING OF THE MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE.
REFERENCES:
GENERIC. LETTER M
IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 3828. MAY 84 4.20.5 VI-4 j
4.20.7.2 CPCO LETTERS TO MRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FEB84 09DEC82 02MAY84 14AUG84 I
24SEP84 INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES RMK 04-84 RMK 03-84 i
1
=
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CONTAINMENT ISOLATION - ONLINE, TESTING OF MSIV ISSUE MUMBER: 950A2 SCORE: 19 COMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER NAS COMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 28FEB85.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
THE NRC STAFF BELIEVES THAT ISOLATION SHOULD BE INSTALLED IN ADDITION TO EXISTING SINGLE MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE (MSIV). PRA NAS DETERMENEDTMAT TME MAIN STEAM LINE IS THE LARGEST COM-TRIBUTOR TO CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FAILURE.
STATUS:
MANPOWER RESOURCES REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION MODIFICATIONS HAVE RESULTED IN SLIPPAGE OF'THE COMMITMENT DATE. MODIFICATIONS TO PERFORM PARTIAL STROKE TESTING ARE EXPECTED TO BE COMPLETED DURING THE 1986 REFUELING OUTAGE. TRG HAS ALSO DECIDED TO REEVALUATE THE COST BENEFIT OF INSTALLING A SECOND MSIV.
RESOLUTION:
THE TRG MAS ELECTED TO PERFORM THE NECESSARY MODIFICATION SS TMAT A MEDIUM TERM (TMREE YEAR $)
STUDY CAN BE PERFORMED IM ORDER TO BETTER ASSESSAND TO IMPROVE MSIV ISOLATION RELIABILITY.
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER
$UREG IPSAR SECTION
}EP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 4.20.5 VI-4 4.20.7.2 CPCO LETTERS TO MRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 22JUN83 09DEC82 02FEB84 02MAY84 245EP82 INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 FC-574 DED 34-13 DED 84-83 PRC MEETINGS 17-83, I-84, 6-84 THROUGM 45-84 RMK 03-84 LER 83-807
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CONTAINMENT ISOLATION - LEAK TEST OFCHECK VALVES ISSUE MUMBER: 8505 SCORE: 9 C0fftITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS COITIITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE i
DESCRIPTIOM:
ISSUE:
PROVIDE LEAK TEST PROGRAM FOR INSTRUMENT AND SERVICE AIR LINE CONTAINMENT ISOLATION CHECK-VALVES.
STATUS:
COMPLETION IS EXPECTED BY COMMITMENT DATE.
RESOLUTIOft:
LE/F RATE TEST CONTAIMMENT ISOLATION VALVES ON SERVICE AMD INSTRUMENT AIR SYSTEM.
1 1
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER MUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 4.20.4 VI-4 e
CPCO LETTERS TO MRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 09DEC82 lh AUG 8h o
l 1
t i
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN I
TITLE DESIGN CODES, CRITERIA AND LOAD COMBINATIONS l
ISSUE MUMBER: 851 l
SCORE: I l
il COMITMENT*
COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED IN THE RESOLUTION BY JUNE 30, 1985 DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
IPSAR(NURES OS28)SECTION 4.I3 SEP TOPIC III-7.B(DESIGN CODES, DESIGN CRITERIA LOAD COMBINATIONS AND REACTOR CAVITY DESIGN CRITERIA), REGUIRES EXPLICIT EVALUATIONS CONSIDERING AFFECTED STRUCTUR ELEMENTS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS ON A SAMPLING BASIS IN THE APPLICATION OF A " WEAK-LINK" APPROACM SEISMIC, WIND AND TORNADOES, MISSILES. HELB AND ORIGINAL PLANT STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS. PROB 1
BILISTIC ANALYSES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED COLLECTIVELY WHEN DECIDING ON SELECTIVE PLANT UPGRADING SO THAT A RELATIVELY EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION IS ACHIEVED FOR ALL MAZARDS CONSIDERED.
STATUS:
ISSUE RESOLUTION IS DELAYED PENDING RESOLUTIONS OF ISSUES 90 AND lb.
i
{
RESOLUTION:
AI. APPOINT A PERSON TO REVIEW WORK PERFORMED BYCONTRAOTORS ON SEISMIC, WIND AND TORNADOES, MISSILES NIGM-EMERGY LINE BREAK AND ORGINAL PLANT STRUCTURAL DESIGN / ANALYSIS ISSUES.
- 2. PURSUE PROBABILISTIC WORK ON INDIVIDUAL TOPICS WHICH MAVE BEEN ADDRESSED DETERMINISTICALLY.
- 3. INTEGRATE RESULTS OF VARIOUS ANALYSES ON A SAMPLING BASIS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL STRUCTURES, i
SYSTEMS OR COMPONENTS FOR MODIFICATION.
l
- 4. REFER MODIFICATION CANDIDATES BACK TO THE GROUP PERFORMING PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS FOR COST /
r BENEFIT ASSESSMENT, OR BI. INACTION MAY BE JUSTIFIED BY RESULTS OF ISSUE 90 AND 14.
REFERENCES
- GENERIC LETTER NUtgG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 4.13 III-7.5 1
CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED
]
02FEB84 30SEP82 i
02SEP81 INTEVNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES JENK 95-83 JLK 84-92
~-
ISSUE 90 4
i l
1 1
~
f i
~
i BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN l
1 TITLE: CONTROL ROOM MABITABILITY - SEAL DOORS ISSUE NUMBER: 857A i
SCORE: 6 2
C0fWIITMENT:
INSTALL SEAL BETWEEN SERVICE AND TURBINE BUILDING DESCRIPTION:
l ISSUE THE TRG DECIDED TNAT ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PERFORMED FOR TNIS ISSUE TO DETERMINE IF 4
THE DOSES RESULTING FROM ACCIDENTS IN MMICM SERIOUS CORE DAMAGE OCCURS COULD BE LOWERED l
FURTMER.
4
-l STATUS:
NO SCHEDULE DETERMINED.
I
}
l RESOLUTION:
THE TNG DECIDED SEALING DOORS BETWEEN THE SERVICE AND TURBINE BUILDING MAY PROVIDE A SLIGHT DECREASE IN DOSE. REGARDLESS OF IT5 COST EFFECTIVENESS.
4 i
i i
- I j
REFERENCES:
l GENERIC LETTER IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC III.D.3.4 VI-8 l
8828 5.3.5.2 l
INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES i
RNB 83-14 ISSUE 57 i
RMK 83-84 A-ML-82-241 i
i
~
l l
i i
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CONTAIMMENT PURGE AND VENT ISSUE MUMBER: c63 I
SCORER I
COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER MAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 28FEB85.
DESCRIPTION:
i ISSUE:
THE DRAFT IPSAR 5.3.6.2 STATES THAT CONSUMERS POWER IS NOT LIMITING THE MUMBER OF MOURS OF VENTI i
LATION AMO THAT TEST FRE9UENCY IS INSUFFICIENT. THE IPSAR ASSUMES THAT CONSUMERS POWER IS TESTIM ONCE EVERY 18 MONTHS.
STATUS:
MATERIAL NOT RECEIVED AT PLANT. PENDING RECEIPT, THE SCREENS WILL BE INSTALLED BY MAY 31, 1985 l
RESOLUTION:
THE TRG CONFIRMS TME PREVIOUS CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY POSTION REGARDING SURVEILLANCE TESTING OF CONTAIMMENT PURGE ISOLATION VALVES, AS PRESENTEDIN CONSUEMRS POWER TO MRC LETTERS DATED 18/24/80 04/28/79, 5/26/81, 11/19/82, AND 6/1/83. ACCORDINGLY, 6 MONTH TEST INTERVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TECMMICAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTIDM 3.17(A) ISADEQUATE.
INSTALL DEBRIS SCREENS.
REFERENCES:
9EMERIC LETTER HURig IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC a
1 8-24 0828, MAY 84 5.3.6.2 CPCO LETTERS TO MRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 240CT80 28JUM83 l
23APR79 145EP82
{
26MAY81 275EP79 19MOV82 250CT79 E1JUH83 24MOV79 i
02FEB84 24MOV81 ll 17DEC79 980CT80 1
20APf81 4
04AUG89 O2 NOV 8h j
I l
ert W
e E =
a W me N A
>=
0 E W 4
> De 4 Wd 36 @
g Wemm w W Iee W EMi i Wee E E IOW m Wa EEUU 1WW E S44646 M
O A
hs 8a O
w I
l.
f i
r N
m I
. W O
l e
i m
a l
Q WN Em b E EM M3 M
m CQ M
l i
e ae
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: RADWASTE MONITOR FLUSH TIMER ISSUE MUMBER: 666 SCORE: 2 C0rW9ITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS CorWitTTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 3IDEC87.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
MEMBERS OF THE PLANT STAFF RECOGNIZE THE NEED TOREDUCE FLOW INTO THE RADWASTE SYSTEM CAUSED BY UNATTEHOED FLUSHING OF THE RADWASTE RADIATION MONITOR.
STATUS:
COMPLETION EXPECTED BY C0FMITMENT DATE.
RESOLUTION:
THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION IS TO ADO AN AUTOMATIC TIMER AND VALVE CONTROLS TO REDUCE THE CHAMGE OF EXCESSIVE WATER GOING TO RADWASTE FOR PROCESSING
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER MHg IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828 MAY 84 5.3.23 CPCO LETTERS TO MRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FE884 INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES FC-540 PROJECT 339
i BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: FACILITY MODIFICATIONS - WAREHOUSE ISSUE NUMBER: 972 SCORE:.12 CermITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS COPWIITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 305EP85.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
EXPAND THE "4" WAREHOUSE FACILITIES (9A AUDIT FINDING) ORIGINAL ISSUE INCLUDED ANNEX MODIFICA-TIONS BUT THAT PORTION WAS CAMCELLED.
STATUS:
AN OFFICE ANNEX IS TO BE IN PLACE LATER IN 1985 WHICH WILL ALLEVIATE THE PERSONNEL HAZARD CONSIDERATION OF THE PRESENT OFFICE WAREHOUSE BUILDING. WHEM COMPLETE TRG WILL RERANK THE WAREHOUSE ISSUE RESOLUTION.
RESOLUTION:
THE LICENSEE MAS PROPOSED A PROJECT TO IMPROVE STOCK STORAGE FOR SUALIFIED E9UIPMENT, NOTE: WAREHOUSE MODIFICATION IS PRESENTLY ON HOLD DUE TO BUDGET RESTRAINTS.
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER HHRig IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 5.3.12 CPCO LETTERS TO MRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 01JUH83 12FER84 14AUG84 INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 IEIR 83-04 PROJECT 443 D-4G-83-55
~
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CONTROL OF NEAVY LOADS ISSUE NUMBER: 873 SCORE: 4 COPMITMENT: NOME AT THIS TIME, ESTABLISH RESOLUTION UPON ISSUANCE ON NRC PHASE II GUIDANCE.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
THE NRC STAFF MAY RE9UIRE CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO ENSURE SAFE MANDLING OF NEAVY LOADS. ONE POTENTIAL MODIFICATION WAS THE INSTALLATION OF INTERLOCKS TO PREVENT THE CONTAINMENT CRANE FROM PASSING OVER CERTAIN AREAS.
RESOLUTION:
THE TRG MAS DECIDED TO COMPLETE WORK ON DETERMINING THE COST EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONTAINMENT CRANE. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS (IE, PROCEDURE REVISIONS) NAVE BEEN COMPLETED (SEE CONSUMERS POWER LETTER DATEDl/18/84).
REFERENCES:
gEMERIC LETTER Hgggg IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 81-07 0828, MAY 84 5.3.20 0612 CPCS LETTERS TO NRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 190Ci79 03FEB81 87JAN80 04FEB74 88MAY81 3SJUN75 18JUN81 06FEB76 81JUL81 28JUL76 02SEP81 17MAY78 15JU183 17AUG79 18JUL83 21JUL82 18JAN84 19DEC83
ISSUE NUFGER 073 BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN 13APR84 39MAy84 INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES RMK 03-84 1
e
~
I BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAM l
t TITLE: REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM-HIGH POINT VENTS 4
4 ISSUE NUM9ERt 874 l
SCORE: IO l
COFMITMENT:
REMOVE HIGH POINT VENTS UPON APPROVAL OF NRC.
DESCRIPTION
- 1 i
ISSUE:
IPSAR (NUREG 9828) SECTION 5.3.26. THE NRC CONC LUDED THAT MODIFICATIONS TO PLACE THE HIGH-POINT I
VENTS IM OPERATION ARE NOT WARRANTED. THE EXISTING HIGH-POINT VENTS POSSIBLY ADD TO THE OVERALL f
SEISMIC RISK OF THE PLANT AND SHOULD BE REMOVED.
i STATUS:
PENDING NRC APPROVAL HIGH POINT VENTS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE REMOVED DURING 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE.
l i
i l
RESOLUTIOMt THE TRS HAS DETERMINED THAT THE HIGH POINT VENTSSNOULD SE REMOVED. THE SYSTEM IS UNNECESSARY j
SINCE: I. THE RDS CAN BE USED TO VENT THE PRES $URE VESSEL. 2. THE LIKELIHOOD OF CORE UNCOVERY IS j
SMALL, AND 3. THE COST OF SEISMICALLY 9UALIFYINGTHE VENTS IS HIGH.
i
REFERENCES:
f GENERIC LETTER
@0737 IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC II.B.I 5.3.26 i
0828 MAY 84 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCU DATED I
82FEB84 135EP79 92 MAYS 4 300CT79 OIJUL82 20MAY89 19APR83 15SEPSI 27DEC79 12AUG83 190EC88 09JUL81 85FEB82 I
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: INVESTICATE INCORE AVAILABILITY PROBLEM ISSUE NUMBER: 877 SCORE: 12 COMMITMENT: NOME. THIS ISSUE IS CONSIDERED RESOLVED.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
SEE ISSUE 77.
REMOVE INCORE DETECTORS.
RESOLUTION:
REVISE PROCEDURES S THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONSTO DELETE REFERENCES TO THE IN-CORE DETECTORS
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 02, MAY 84 5.3.13 CPCS LETTERS TO NRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED SIJUN83 02FEB84 02 MAYS 4 14AUG84 INIERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES JRI 83-02 A-BRP-83-21 JRK 43-47 A-BRP-83-06 JAU,65-83 PROJECT 429 l
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: INVESTIGATE INCORE AVAILABILITY PROBLEM ISSUE NURSER: 877A SCORE: 12 CerMITMENT:
SUBMIT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
IN-CORE DETECTORS ARE UNRELIABLE DUE TO DETECTOR FAILURES. FLUXWIRES HAVE BECOME THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF ANALYTICAL VERIFICATION OF IOCAL FLUX PREDICTIONS DURING POWER OPERATION.
STATUS:
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST TO BE SUBMIITED BY FEB 20 1985 RESOLUTION:
REVISE TECH SPECS AND PROCEDURES 10 REMOVE INCORES REFERENCE.
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER NFtES IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828. MAY 84 5.3.I3 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FER84 92MAY84 14AUG84
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: RDS DEPRESSURIZATION PILOT VALVE LEAKAGE ISSUE MUMBER: 882 SCORE: 29 C0rmITMENT:
EVALUATE PILOT VALVE LEAKAGE BY JUNE 31, 198h.
DESCRIPTIOM:
ISSUE:
RDS PILOT VALVE LEAKAGE CAM LEAD TO PREMATURE OPENING AND DELAYED RESEATING OF THE PILOT-OPER-ATED VALVES. AS A RESULT OF SPURIOUS OPENING OF THE RDS, IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLETELY DEPRESSURIZE THE REACTOR.
STATUS:
AN EVALUATION BASED ON THE MANUFACTURERS PROPOSAL FOR MODIFICATION OF THE PILOT VALVES DETERMINED THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEM. RECENT INSPECTION OF A PILOT ASSEMBLY HAS BEVEALED AN ACCUMULATION OF GRIT AT THE STEAM PATH BETWEEN THE VALVE TOP AND THE PILOT VALVE. BECAUSE INSPECTION OF THE MAIN VALVE BODIES HAVE FOUND NO GRIT IN THE TOP ASSEMBLY IS SUSPZCTED TO BE THE SOURCE OF THE GRIT PROBLEM.
INVESTIGATIONS WILL CONTINUE.
RESOLUTIDH EVALUATE LEAKAGE REDUCTION.
REFEREMCES:
GEMERIC LETTER HMEER IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 S.3.1.1 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED e2FEB84 11 FEB 85
- 18 DEC 84 02MAY84 26 NOV 8h INTERNAL MEMOS DIHER RELEVANT REVERENCES DPH 84-71 D-BRP-84-19 CRA 34-87 D-BRP-84-21 DPB 83-06 D-BRP-83-89 RMK 03-84 A-BRP-81-07 PRC MEETINGS 33-84, 22-84, 7-84 1
0
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN i
TITLE: FULL STROKE TESTING OF REACTDR DEPRE55URIZATION VALVES ISSUE NUMBER: 883 SCORE: 5 COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER NAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 31MARB5.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
THE PLANT STAFF FEELS THAT PARTIAL STROKE TESTING OF THE REACTOR DEPRE55URIZATION SYSTEM DE-PRES 5URIZATION VALVES MAY NOT ADE90ATELY VERIFY OPERABILITY OF THE SYSTEM. THE PRESENT TEST ONLY VERIFIES A FRACTION OF TOTAL STROKE.
i STATUS:
INVESTIGATION OF FETHODS TO FULL STROKE TEST THE VALVES AND SUITABILITY OF PRESENT TESTING l
ARE CONTINUING.
I RESOLUTION:
THE TRG ELECTED TO PERFORM AN EVALUATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF THE PRESENT TEST OR NEED FO i
IMPROVEMENT.
f l
REFERENCES:
GENEPIC LETTER ggRgg IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 8828, MAY 84 5.3.1.3 l
CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FEB84 18 DEC 8h 26 NOV 8h I
e l
i BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: SCRAM DUMP TANK VALVES - LACK OF REDUNDANCY (STUDY)
ISSUE NUMBER: 884 l
SCORE: 14 COMMITMENT: NOME. THIS ISSUE IS CONSIDERED RESOLVED.
l j
DESCRIPTION:
I ISSUE THE PLANT STAFF RECOGNIZE 5 THE NEED TO EVALUATE THE POTENTIAL FOR A LOCA DUE TO SINGLE FAILURE I IN THE SCRAM DUMP TANK VENT & DRAIN INSOLATION SYSTEM. ALTHOUGH NO SCRAM DUMP TAME VALVE FAILURE i
HAVE OCCURRED AT BIG ROCK POINT, THE SYSTEM IS CHALLENGED DURING EACH SCRAM. A LOCA WOULD BE LIMITED TO LEAKAGE FLOW THROUGH THE CONTROL ROD DRIVES BUT WOULD NOT BE EASILY ISOLATED.
1 l
I i
RESOLUTION:
AN EVALUATION WAS PERFORMED AND PRESENTED TO THETRG WHICH:
- 1. DETERMINED THE RISK OF A LOCA DUE TO THIS EVENT.
I
- 2. DETERMINED POS3IBLE SOLUTIONS.
I THIS ISSUE IS FURTHER ADDRESSED IN ISSUE 84A.
REFERENCEst GENERIC LETTER NUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 81-18 0828, MAY 84 5.3.8.2 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPC0 D&lER l-02MOVSI 22MAY81 3
3IJUL89 270CT89 26JAN81 INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 HGB 34-02 IEB 80-14 IES 80-17 A-BRP-83-18 i
1 1
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN 1
TITLE SCRAM DUMP TANK REDUNDANT VALVES ISSUE NURSER: 884A SCORE: 14 CerW91TMENT* MONE AT THIS TIME DESCRIPTION:
i ISSUEt REDUCE THE RISK OF A LOCA DUE TO A SINGLE FAILURE IN THE SCRAM DUMP TANK VENT AND DRAIN ISO-j LATION SYSTEM.
STATUS:
NO SCHEDULE DEVELOPED TO INSTALL REDUNDANT VALVES.
i 1
RESOLUTION:
ADD DOUBLE ISOLATION TO SCRAM DUMP TANK VENT LINE AND DRAIN LINE.
i REFERENCES *
)
GENERIC LETTER NUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC l
8828. MAY 84 5.3.8.2 j
INTERNAL MEMOS RHER RELEVANT REVERENCES J
HGB 84-92 ISSUE 84 4
)
i 4
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: PIPE BREAK DUTSIDE OF CONTAIMMENT ISSUE MUMBER: 087 SCORE: II COMMITMENT:
NONE. THIS ISSUE IS CONSIDERED RESOLVED, PENDING ISSUANCE OF THE APPROVED PROCEDURE l
REVISION.
l DESCRIPTION:
I ISSUE:
THE ISSUE IS A RESULT OF SEP. TOPIC III.55 AND IPSAR HUREG (8828) SECTION 4.11. A PIPE BREAK t
IN THE SCREENNOUSE MAY RESULT IN A FLOOD, DISABLING DEMINERALIZER FILL PUMPS, FIRE PUMP 5 AND WELL MATER PUMPS. THIS WOULD LEAVE NO MEANS OF SUPPLYING MAKEUP WATER TO THE EMERGENCY COM-DENSER 8 EVENTUALLY (4 HOURS LATER) WATER IN TMEEMERGENCY CONDENSER WOULD BOIL OFF TO A 1
LEVEL BELOW THE TUBES.
s STATUS:
ISSUE COMPLETED AS PER RESOLUTION IN JANUARY 1985 l
l RESOLUTION:
THE TRG MAS DETERMINED THAT AN EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURE SHOULD BE WRITTEN INSTRUCTING THE j
OPERATORS TO PHONE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IN ORDER TO FILL THE DEMINERALIZER TAMK IF SUCH AN EVENT WOULD OCCUR. A COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS WILL BE PERFORMED TO EXAMIME POSSIBLE MODIFICATIONS WHICH WOULD PROVIDE A SOURCE OF EMERGENCY CONDENSER MAKE-UP IN THE EVENT OF SCREENHOUSE FLOODING.
l
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER NUREG IP$AR SECTION SEP TOPIC l
0828 MAY 84 4.11 111-5.8 l
l-l
't
J BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CLASSIFICATION OF STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS ISSUE NUMBER: 898 SCORE: Il COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER MAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS IS5UE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 31MAY85.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
IPSAR (NUREG 38283 SECTION 4.4. SEP TOPIC III-1 REOUIRED:
- 1. PERFORMANCE OF SAMPLE ANALYSES TO CONFIRM ADE4UATE MARGINAL SAFETY FOR PIPING FATIGUE.
- 2. PERFORMANCE OF 5AMPEL ANALYSES TO CONFIRM ADE9UATE MARGIN OF SAFETY FOR VESSEL FATIGUE.
STATUS:
COMPLETION BY COMMITMENT DATE EXPECTED.
RESOLUTION:
THE TRG MAS ELECTED TO:
I. SEPARATE SEISMIC LOADS FROM FATIGUE LOADS.
- 2. SELECT A SYSTEM MITH EITHER THERMAL OR MECHANICAL FATIGUE INPUT (PREFERABLY A SAFETY SYSTEM).
- 3. ANALYZE THE SELECTED SYSTEM ACCORDING TO FRANKLIN RESEARCN CENTER METHODS.
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTER NUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828. MAY 84 4.4 111-1
$PCS LETTERS TO NRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED s2FEB84 16APR82 IMIERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES JLK A4-02 A-BRP-83-28 JEME 10-83 A-BRP-84-31
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: INSTALLATION OF ISOL VLVE UPSTREAM OF CV-4927 ISSUE NUMBER: 896 SCORE
- II CSITIITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER NAT C0fetITTEB TO COMPLETE THE MORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOM, BY THE END OF INE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
THE LOCAL LEAK RATE TEST METHOD MAS CHANGEB TO MEET APPENDIX J REGUIREMENTS. THE VOLUME AND NUMBER OF VALVES FOR TESTING TME CLEAN-UP DEMIN/ FUEL POOL DRAIN LINE CONTAINENT ISOLATION VALVES CREATES A PROBLEM MITH THE RELIABILITY OFTNE NEW TEST METN3D.
STATUS:
TESTING OF THE CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES DURING THE LAST TWO REFUELING OUTAGES HAS BEEN SATISFACTORY AND THEREFORE THE MODIFICATION WAS NOT NECESSARY AND DELAYED. IF UPCOMING TESTING IS ALSO SATISFACTORY THE PROJECT WILL AGAIN BE DELAYED.
RESOLUTION:
THE TRG MAS DECIDED TS INSTALL A NEW VALVE WNICHNILL MAKE THE LOCAL LEAK RATE TEST MORE ACCURATE AND WHICH MILL MAKE IT EASIER TO IDENTIFY VALVES TO BE FIXED IF TME TEST FAILS.
REFERENCES:
CPCO LETTERS TO NRC BATED IMtC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FE884 14 AUrAg INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 FC-548, PROJECT 403 l
1 i
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGkATED PLAN TITLE: REVISIOffS TO I2S-VOLT DC DRAWINGS I$ SUE NUMBER
- 998 SCORE: I3 COfTIITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER MAS COrmITTED TO COMPLETE THE MORE ON TMIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 30APRS5.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
125-vDC PANEL LOADS ARE NOT EASILY IDENTIFIABLE.A SOURCE (DRAWING) LISTING LOADS WOULD BE NELP-FUL IN DESIGN AND TAGGING SITUATIONS.
STATUS:
THIS ISSUE IS COMPLETE.
RESOLUTIOM:
THE TRS NAS ELECTED TO IDENTIFY LOADS ON SREARERS IN TME I25-VDC PANEL AND REVISE DRAWINGS APPROPRIATELY.
REFERENCES:
CPCO }ETTERS TO MRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 82FEBa4 I4AU".84 INTE8tNAL MEMOS OTMER RELEVANT. REVERENCES JRI 83-24 W
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: VENDOtt INTERFACE AND MANUALS ISSUE NUMSER: Igg SCORE: 8 CONIITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER NAS CtNWIITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON TNIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED SELOM, SY 31DEC85.
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
THE NRC IS CONCERNED TNAT UTILITIES MAY NOT BE COLLECTING AND CONTROLLING VENDOR MANUALS IN AN ADE9UATE MANNER.
S*ATUS:
COMPLETION EXPECTED BY COMMITMENT DATE.
RESOLUTION:
TNE TRS DETERMINED TNAT A SYSTEM SHOULD BE DEVELOPED ISIICM CROSS REFERENCES EtUIPMENT AND MAN-UALS AND MAINTAINS TME MANUALS IN A CURRENT FASNION.
REFERENCES:
GENERIC LETTEtt MUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 43-28 (2.2(23)
CPCS LETTERS TO MRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPC0 DATED 37NOV83 INTERNAL MEMOS OTNER RELEVANT REVERENCES GCW 84-13 RrfK 33-84
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CORE SPRAY PUMP SUCTISM STRAINER BLOCKAGE ISSUE NUMBER: 104 SCORE: 8 COFMITMENT: NOME AT TNIS TIME DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE IN AN ACCIDENT ENVIRONMENT. TMERE IS TME POTENTIAL FOR CORE SPRAY STRAINERS TO BECOME BLOCKED BY MISCELLANEDUS DEBRIS.
~
STATUS:
PROJECT SCHEDULE HAS NOT BEEN DEVEIDPED DUE TO LOW PRIORITY.
RESOLUTI0ft:
TME TRG MAS DECIDED TO INVESTIGATE TME POSSIBILITY OF BACRFLUSMING TME SUCTION STRAINER SCREENS OR ADOING INSTRUMENTATION TO DETERMINE PUMP BLOCKAGE.
REFERENCES:
JgIIRMAL MEMOS OTNER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 RML 03-84 PROJECT 521
BIG ROCR POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: REACTOR DEPRE55URIZATION SYSTEM MANGER REPLACEMENT ISSUE MUMBER: 105 s
SCORE: 7 l
COFMITMENT: NOME AT THIS TIME f
t DESCRIPTION:
/.
ISSUE:
RDS PIPE MANGER 15 DISCONNECTED EACH REFUELING OUTAGE FOR SYSTEM HYDROSTATIC TESTING. EXISTING HANGER DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO SUPPORT THE HYDROSTATIC LOAD.
i STATUS:
PROJECT SCHEDULE HAS NOT BEEN DEVELOPED.
<y s
RESOLUTION:
REPLACE RDS PIPE MANGER.
r-(
REFERENCES
- li
)
2 I
'I 7.
/
i
[h f
. +
(
i
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: REMOVE TURBINE GRATING IS5UE NUMBER: 196 SCORE: II COMMITMENT: MONE AT THIS TIME DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
TURBINE GRATING BLOCRS AN ESCAPE ROUTE FOR MAINTENANCE PERSOMMEL PERFORMING PIPE LEAK INSPEC-TIONS UNDER THE TURBINE.
STATUS:
COMPl2 TION EXPECTED BY END OF 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE.
RESOLUTION REMOVE GRATING AT TURBINE GENERATOR STANDARD, INSTALL ALARM / LOCKING DEVICE (VITAL AREA).
l
REFERENCES:
INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 REQUEST FOR MOD FROM GCWITHRDW-3/20/84
_ +^
C
BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: SACKUP HIGH RANGE STACK MONITOR ISSUE MUMBER: 109 SCORE: 3 C0FMITMENIt NOME AT THIS TIME 4
DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE REFERENCE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT RESUEST DATED 12/I6/83. MRC WOULD LIKE THE TSR TO i
BE CONSISTENT WITH STS WORDING. IMPLEMENTING AN ALTERNATE PREPLANNED METHOD FOR HIGH RANGE STACK MONITORING IF THE NEW STACK MONITOR IS INOPERABLE.
STATUS:
A TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST WAS RE-SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 8, 19814 TO INCORPORATE NRCs REQUEST. PENDING NRC REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
RESOLUTION:
ROUTE THE EXHAUST OF THE HIGH RANGE STACK MONITOR THROUGH THE 'OLD' HIGN RANGE STACK MONITOR SHIELDING 50 THE 'OLD' HIGH RANGE STACK MONITOR CAN BECOME OUR BACKUP MONITOR.
REFERENCES:
GPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS.TO CPCO DATED 16DEC83 16FE583 INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 JLS 84-55 A-ML-84-57 9A05 1217-84
i BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN i
TITLE: LIGNTNING PROTECTION ISSUE NUMBER IIS SCORE: 10 COMMITMENT: NOME AT TNIS TIME DESCRIPTION:
ISSUE:
LIGNTNING STRIF.ES MAY CAUSE ERUIPMENT MALFUNCTION / DAMAGE.
STATUS:
NO SCHEDULE DEVELOPED.
RESOLUTION:
- 1. REDESIGN THE WELL PURP MOUSE ANNUNCIATOR ALARM CIRCUIT, REMOVE THE DC CIRCUIT TO REPLACE THE GROUNO LOOP OR ANTENNA EFFECT.
- 3. REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER PUMP CONTROL CIRCUIT FUSE.
4.
IMPLEMENT A PM PROGRAM TO TEST PLANT GROUNO SYSTEM RESISTANCE.
REFERENCES:
M RNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES LARK 3-84 PRC MEETING 84-35, 22-84 i
-